Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:55 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To:        Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs>
Subject:   Re: nomenclature for conf files
Message-ID:  <CADLo83-JOuY0TgjV2LFmwk%2BHGuJjx%2BX0nUP6k1n33ggM2wmTgQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADy1Ce4mnMriN1UsEOQbKddsv1dEx_2=wSEOh91t1P_D%2Bud88w@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20121112051229.GA1235@mycenae.sbb.rs> <CADy1Ce6W4nfQHvHNx7YO9jEc6Aou9hjtHzdVV9xhxZ-rGzWhmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo839uwhSGLtit16oOOmSibN3G%2B7GL2CEb7kBD9J_AvUSfyg@mail.gmail.com> <CADy1Ce4mnMriN1UsEOQbKddsv1dEx_2=wSEOh91t1P_D%2Bud88w@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 Nov 2012 15:35, "Kurt Buff" <kurt.buff@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" <kurt.buff@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> wrote:
> >> > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's
> >> > any difference. Are those 3 line the same?
> >> >
> >> > WITH_KMS=YES
> >> > WITH_KMS="YES"
> >> > WITH_KMS=yes
> >>
> >> With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not.
> >>
> >> In general, from my experience, only the second one will work.
> >>
> >> This might, or might not, be true for other uses, but rc.conf is
> >> pretty picky about this.
> >
> > All three are fine in make.conf and rc.conf
> >
> > The issue with rc.conf is when people put spaces around the = sign.
> >
> > Chris
>
> This has not been my experience - but I will experiment soon and see
> if I can verify.

Anything that complains about any of those syntaxes is a bug.  Please file
a PR if you find any examples.

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-JOuY0TgjV2LFmwk%2BHGuJjx%2BX0nUP6k1n33ggM2wmTgQ>