Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:04:56 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>, David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/syslogd syslogd.c Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020109210311.12228A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20020109203704.B31387@espresso.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> writes: > > Sure, not a whole lot, but I do use the ports tree. I've never > > had -Wall abort a port build. I consider our ports tree a separate > > thing anyways. We should have higher standards for the code in > > our own source tree. I think everyone making changes in src should > > be compiling with -Wall. > > I prefer BDECFLAGS, but setting that does break some software. I assume that's more stringent, but that's OK too. BTW, where are these defined (other than in bde's head)? -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1020109210311.12228A-100000>