Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:59:24 +0100
From:      Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org>
To:        marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org,  svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r391493 - head/cad/tkgate
Message-ID:  <559BB10C.5080801@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <559BAFE4.3040608@marino.st>
References:  <201507070635.t676Zaqw085725@repo.freebsd.org> <559B9C36.2060300@FreeBSD.org> <559BA1B2.4050002@marino.st> <559BA55C.2080701@FreeBSD.org> <559BA846.4030506@marino.st> <559BADF2.2080906@FreeBSD.org> <559BAFE4.3040608@marino.st>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 07/07/2015 11:54, John Marino wrote:
> On 7/7/2015 12:46 PM, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
>>> Everything I did was permissible.  I did not have to send the 
>>> followup message, I did that out of courtesy.  I am not
>>> required to "be polite" as you define it.  I feel that I was
>>> courteous and I'm sorry you don't think so.
>> 
>> Ok, from what I'm being observing in your communications with
>> other developers, I can conclude that it's meaningless to talk
>> with you about conventions that exist within the community.
> 
> I followed the explicit rules. The whole point of "Just fix it" is
> that one is not required to communicate with the maintainer first.
> The blanket was introduced both to streamline the process to result
> in faster fixes and to remove unnecessary obstacles that some
> maintainers were famous for erecting.
> 
> As part of "Just fix it", it is suggested to let the maintainer
> know for awareness purposes, which I did, but that is not
> required.
> 
> Please, nobody insulted you.  The intention was to serve the
> community and do you a favor.  I am saddened that you do not
> appreciate this gesture, but you can at least be a bit happy that
> your port is now available on all platforms, which is really the
> important thing, no?

Let's finish this discussion. I'm grateful to you for your fix, as it
is really useful, but I would appreciate if you could notice me about
such a changes in advance in future.

- -- 
Vsevolod Stakhov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=FDve
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?559BB10C.5080801>