From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 8 7: 0: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE1437B408; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=exim) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1) id 15qaws-00022v-00; Mon, 08 Oct 2001 16:00:02 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ident=danny) by pampa.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 15qawr-0000An-00; Mon, 08 Oct 2001 16:00:01 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: anderson@centtech.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, danny@cs.huji.ac.il Subject: Re: strange network performace In-Reply-To: Message from Eric Anderson of "Mon, 08 Oct 2001 08:41:23 EST." <3BC1AD03.127B3B21@centtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 16:00:01 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > And what happens when you go from A or B to C? Have you been running a top or systat -vmstat while this is happening? > I'm thinking it might be a purely IO thing, on the proc box. I have seen similar slowness with the default FreeBSD > install on single proc boxes, but a few sysctl's seem to do the trick. a reminder: A -> NetAPP B -> NetAPP C -> NetAPP is fine, im running the same test, and the results are consitant, ~10MGBs so that should eliminate network/switch/port/cable problems, right? btw, no network errors are reported, neither from the hosts nor the switches. danny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message