Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      06 Jan 1999 16:32:22 -0500
From:      "Robert V. Baron" <rvb@cs.cmu.edu>
To:        "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Andrzej Bialecki <abial@nask.pl>
Subject:   Re: /boot/boot.rc && /boot/rc.d
Message-ID:  <yzs1zl8140p.fsf@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: "Daniel C. Sobral"'s message of Wed, 06 Jan 1999 03:18:40 %2B0900
References:  <36925780.75AB6581@newsguy.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> writes:

> I was thinking about possible on-comings "patches" in boot.rc
> (currently known as boot.conf :), when I realized that for
> third-party drivers or ports making use of loader it would better to
> source files from a boot/rc.d directory.

I was wondering whether boot.rc should be named loader.rc.  It seems
to me that /boot.config has to hang around for a while to set flags
for boot2.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yzs1zl8140p.fsf>