From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep  2 10:44:38 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D110016A4BF
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Sep 2003 10:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9A243F75
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Sep 2003 10:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h82HiRi8049359;
	Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:44:29 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Sep 2003 10:37:36 PDT."
             <752234866.1062499054@melange.errno.com> 
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 19:44:27 +0200
Message-ID: <49358.1062524667@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: TESTERS: if_sis patch 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 17:44:38 -0000

In message <752234866.1062499054@melange.errno.com>, Sam Leffler writes:

>> In my tests, using a soekris 4801 computer I have found:
>> 
>It is especially important that folks with Soekris 45xx boards try this.
>My tests appeared to indicate there might be issues, but my operating
>environment is so different from -current that is was hard to tell if the
>problems I saw (lost packets) were due to this change or others.

This patch is different from the one you got earlier Sam, in particular
it only sets the interrupt holdoff (and much more conservatively)
and does not touch the DMA parameters at all.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.