Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 22:42:07 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ttys patch - any objections? Message-ID: <20020926194206.GD37404@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <200209261350.g8QDoLRP003375@grimreaper.grondar.org> References: <20020926094019.A58629-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org> <200209261350.g8QDoLRP003375@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-09-26 14:50, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> wrote: > > This seems a lot like personal preferance to me, I for one don't like a > > lot of tty's, because running getty on a bunch of ttys that I'm not going > > to use is a waste of ram.... I usually keep F1-F3 as ttys, and make F4 run > > kdm. I know I don't really have a say, but I'm sure everyone has his or > > her own preference. > > Sure! That is why I'm doing a straw poll. If more people seem to like this, > I'll commit it. If I get shouted down, I'll keep it as a local hack. I customarily turn some of them off. All I need is 2-3 vtys, to run a couple of screen(1) sessions. My own local set of changes includes a patch that is almost the opposite of the proposed change (all vtys are turned off, except for ttyv[0123]---the first four). Giorgos. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020926194206.GD37404>