From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 00:32:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C9516A40F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:32:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6A543D67 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:32:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 25582 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2006 00:32:07 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 19 Nov 2006 00:32:07 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3D30728453; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:32:06 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <455F17F5.2000403@computer.org> <44k61s3bbo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <455F59FA.3020201@computer.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:32:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <455F59FA.3020201@computer.org> (Eric Schuele's message of "Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:07:38 -0600") Message-ID: <44psbkmg3e.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: cvsup problems.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:32:09 -0000 Eric Schuele writes: > On 11/18/06 11:37, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Eric Schuele writes: >> >>> I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new >>> bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server what usually >>> takes five minutes, takes 30-minutes to an hour (or they just >>> hang). Which is terribly annoying. >>> >>> I've tried picking other servers by hand, and I've tried the >>> fastest_cvsup script. Doesn't seem to matter which I pick. They all >>> seem to be slow except cvsup5... and cvsup5 does not give me anything >>> anymore. No source, no ports, no docs. >> >> cvsup5.us.freebsd.org does seem to have stopped updating. I've >> cc'd the "hubs" mailing list in case this was not known. >> >>> I have not changed anything on my end. Is there something going on >>> that I am not aware of that is affecting the servers, or my ability to >>> interact with them? Is it related to the release, the move, anything? >> >> I tried cvsup3.us.freebsd.org (the example you showed in your >> supfile), and it seemed fine; not just fast, but fully in synch >> with my usual cvsup host (although it was busy enough that I had >> to try for a while before I got in). So whatever is going on does >> seem to be local to you. >> > > I don't know what it could be. Try increasing the verbosity of cvsup; it may be able to tell you what its problem is. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 00:37:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A288416A40F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:37:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4241443D4C for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:37:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE1F1A3C20; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:37:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 05933513FB; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:36:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:36:55 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: David Pratt Message-ID: <20061119003655.GA64411@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <455F94F4.7010309@eastlink.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <455F94F4.7010309@eastlink.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Modifying gcc34 makefile to compile with java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:37:09 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 07:19:16PM -0400, David Pratt wrote: > Hi. I have recently tried to compile gcc34 port with java by modifying=20 > Makefile by adding the argument >=20 > --enable-languages=3Dc,c++,java >=20 > This failed giving me a list of languages that excluded java. This=20 > version of gcc is capable of compiling with java. Can someone provide=20 > some advice on getting this port to compile with java properly. Anyone=20 > done this? Many thanks. AFAIK you really don't want to use gcc 3.4's java support, it was not usable before the 4.x branch. Accordingly, the gcc 4.x ports allow java to be specified. Kris --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFX6cnWry0BWjoQKURAlzuAKC/LxERdXG5CCOiGG3OuycFA+t4zACgmOVH BM2xoGPjEHOSoc7rfI8NiG0= =NDhE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 00:58:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D96316A403 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fairwinds@eastlink.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD1E43D45 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:57:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fairwinds@eastlink.ca) Received: from ip03.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.15]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J8Y00J5JDCAL2M0@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:57:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from blk-224-181-0.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.1.250]) ([24.224.181.0]) by ip03.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:58:04 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:58:01 -0400 From: David Pratt In-reply-to: <20061119003655.GA64411@xor.obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway Message-id: <455FAC19.8010009@eastlink.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAPg5X0UY4LUAdGdsb2JhbAANjDsB X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,437,1157338800"; d="scan'208"; a="357012992:sNHT29069922" References: <455F94F4.7010309@eastlink.ca> <20061119003655.GA64411@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Modifying gcc34 makefile to compile with java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:58:05 -0000 Hi Kris. I realize the java support prior to 4 requires a ton of RAM to compile but I also know the compiler is reasonably good afterwards (from other platforms) but have not been successful with FreeBSD at this point. I attempted a few tries at 4.1 an 4.2 today and getting this sort of an error using gcj: /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.0/libgcj.so.8: Undefined symbol "_Unwind_GetIPInfo" so am looking to try something earlier that is known to work on Linux. Regards, David Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 07:19:16PM -0400, David Pratt wrote: >> Hi. I have recently tried to compile gcc34 port with java by modifying >> Makefile by adding the argument >> >> --enable-languages=c,c++,java >> >> This failed giving me a list of languages that excluded java. This >> version of gcc is capable of compiling with java. Can someone provide >> some advice on getting this port to compile with java properly. Anyone >> done this? Many thanks. > > AFAIK you really don't want to use gcc 3.4's java support, it was not > usable before the 4.x branch. Accordingly, the gcc 4.x ports allow > java to be specified. > > Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 01:07:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940A516A403 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9C043D45 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:07:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C59C1A3C20; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:07:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADE8A513FB; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:07:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:07:00 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: David Pratt Message-ID: <20061119010700.GA65368@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <455F94F4.7010309@eastlink.ca> <20061119003655.GA64411@xor.obsecurity.org> <455FAC19.8010009@eastlink.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <455FAC19.8010009@eastlink.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Modifying gcc34 makefile to compile with java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:07:14 -0000 --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:58:01PM -0400, David Pratt wrote: > Hi Kris. I realize the java support prior to 4 requires a ton of RAM to= =20 > compile but I also know the compiler is reasonably good afterwards (from= =20 > other platforms) but have not been successful with FreeBSD at this=20 > point. > > I attempted a few tries at 4.1 an 4.2 today and getting this=20 > sort of an error using gcj: >=20 > /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.0/libgcj.so.8: Undefined symbol "_Unwind_GetIPInfo" >=20 > so am looking to try something earlier that is known to work on Linux. If I were you I'd focus on solving that error instead. Without more context I can't help though. Kris --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFX640Wry0BWjoQKURAj/0AJwM+ak05Db8GA8cLq3YATFzVlNc0gCgokcc qA2EG8mpNc0Tk3g3xyZlZug= =q+Dd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wac7ysb48OaltWcw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 01:33:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C7D16A40F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.192.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D409743D5A for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:33:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (cpe-76-184-133-124.tx.res.rr.com[76.184.133.124]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20061119013319m1200ks4pee>; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:33:24 +0000 Message-ID: <455FB45E.8020403@computer.org> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:33:18 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <455F17F5.2000403@computer.org> <44k61s3bbo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <455F59FA.3020201@computer.org> <44psbkmg3e.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44psbkmg3e.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup problems.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:33:28 -0000 On 11/18/06 18:32, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Eric Schuele writes: > >> On 11/18/06 11:37, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>> Eric Schuele writes: >>> >>>> I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new >>>> bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server what usually >>>> takes five minutes, takes 30-minutes to an hour (or they just >>>> hang). Which is terribly annoying. >>>> >>>> I've tried picking other servers by hand, and I've tried the >>>> fastest_cvsup script. Doesn't seem to matter which I pick. They all >>>> seem to be slow except cvsup5... and cvsup5 does not give me anything >>>> anymore. No source, no ports, no docs. >>> cvsup5.us.freebsd.org does seem to have stopped updating. I've >>> cc'd the "hubs" mailing list in case this was not known. >>> >>>> I have not changed anything on my end. Is there something going on >>>> that I am not aware of that is affecting the servers, or my ability to >>>> interact with them? Is it related to the release, the move, anything? >>> I tried cvsup3.us.freebsd.org (the example you showed in your >>> supfile), and it seemed fine; not just fast, but fully in synch >>> with my usual cvsup host (although it was busy enough that I had >>> to try for a while before I got in). So whatever is going on does >>> seem to be local to you. >>> >> I don't know what it could be. > > > Try increasing the verbosity of cvsup; it may be able to tell you > what its problem is. > Man page says cvsup -g -L 2 ${SUPFILE_DIR}/supfile Is as verbose as it gets. Which is what I used in my last post. Is there something more I can tweak? Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 02:02:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BF216A416 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C83443D49 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:02:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.8) id kAJ22mWl040905; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:02:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:02:48 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061119020247.GB15898@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200611182020.UAA03897@sopwith.solgatos.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611182020.UAA03897@sopwith.solgatos.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:02:49 -0000 In the last episode (Nov 18), Dieter said: > In the tcpdump output below, the src machine is sending data to the > bsd machine. At one point during this test, the bsd machine is > slowly falling behind, as shown in the smaller and smaller window > size. > > It looks like at one point, the bsd machine takes 5.5 seconds to ack > a packet. :-( Am I interpreting the -ttt delta time correctly? A shrinking window and no packet loss is an indication that the program the socket is connected to isn't reading data fast enough. If you're locally gzipping the output of a remote backup, for example, you'll see this. The receive window on the BSD box shrunk to 1051 free bytes, the sender decided not to send a partial packet, 5.5 seconds later the process on the BSD box finally read some data, and the kernel sent a couple of window update acks to the sending box letting it know to send more data. > Getsockopt() says bsd machine's send buffer = 33580, rec buffer = 197100 > Is there a way for the bsd machine to find out what the src machine's > send buffer size is? I doubt that it is large enough for 5.5 seconds' > worth of data, but it would be nice to know what the goal is. > > Towards the end of the log, it looks to me like both sides are a > bit quick to resend data and acks? Those acks are being resent because from the BSD machine's point of view, the sender has skipped some data starting at 1281784, so it'll keep asking for that byte until the sender sends it (which it eventually does). The receiver usually sends an ack for every other full-size incoming data packet, but I'm pretty sure when there's loss every one gets an ack (whether the incoming packet increments the receivers sequence number or not). The completely duplicated data packets from the sender, even before any perceived packet loss, are troubling. Either the sender decided to resend that data on its own, or the packet was duplicated by a router or switch in transit. Dumps of the same stream from both sender and receiver would help, as would enabling rfc 1323 extensions on both systems (which will put a timestamp value on each packet and enable SACK. It's enabled by default on FreeBSD). > 000016 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1201508 win 65535 > 000641 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1201508:1202824(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000780 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1202824:1204140(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1204140 win 65535 > 000953 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1204140:1205456(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000938 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1205456:1206772(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1206772 win 65535 > 000640 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1206772:1208088(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000781 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1208088:1209404(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1209404 win 62903 > 001110 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1209404:1210720(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000780 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1210720:1212036(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1212036 win 60271 > 000641 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1212036:1213352(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000782 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1213352:1214668(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1214668 win 57639 > 000953 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1214668:1215984(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000941 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1215984:1217300(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1217300 win 55007 > 000952 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1217300:1218616(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000781 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1218616:1219932(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1219932 win 52375 > 000798 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1219932:1221248(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000794 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1221248:1222564(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1222564 win 49743 > 000646 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1222564:1223880(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000933 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1223880:1225196(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1225196 win 47111 > 000954 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1225196:1226512(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000625 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1226512:1227828(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1227828 win 44479 > 000798 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1227828:1229144(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000936 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1229144:1230460(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1230460 win 41847 > 000953 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1230460:1231776(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000624 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1231776:1233092(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1233092 win 39215 > 000797 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1233092:1234408(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000780 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1234408:1235724(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1235724 win 36583 > 000953 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1235724:1237040(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000937 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1237040:1238356(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1238356 win 33951 > 000641 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1238356:1239672(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 001092 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1239672:1240988(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1240988 win 31319 > 000796 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1240988:1242304(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000626 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1242304:1243620(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1243620 win 28687 > 000952 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1243620:1244936(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000783 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1244936:1246252(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000015 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1246252 win 26055 > 000797 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1246252:1247568(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000937 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1247568:1248884(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1248884 win 23423 > 000797 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1248884:1250200(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000938 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1250200:1251516(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1251516 win 20791 > 000642 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1251516:1252832(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000782 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1252832:1254148(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1254148 win 18159 > 000797 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1254148:1255464(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 001251 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1255464:1256780(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000014 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1256780 win 15527 > 000640 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1256780:1258096(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000937 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1258096:1259412(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1259412 win 12895 > 000797 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1259412:1260728(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000945 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1260728:1262044(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1262044 win 10263 > 000640 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1262044:1263360(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000952 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1263360:1264676(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000014 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1264676 win 7631 > 000796 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1264676:1265992(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000938 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1265992:1267308(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1267308 win 4999 > 000801 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1267308:1268624(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000936 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1268624:1269940(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1269940 win 2367 > 000798 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1269940:1271256(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 099460 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1271256 win 1051 <-- window smaller than 1316 > 5. 537213 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1271256 win 4096 <-- does this mean 5.5 seconds? :-( > 000027 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1271256 win 31744 > 000026 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1271256 win 57088 > 000024 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1271256 win 65535 > 000333 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1271256:1272572(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000006 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1272572:1273888(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000034 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1273888 win 65535 > 000113 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1273888:1275204(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000157 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1275204:1276520(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000003 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1271256:1272572(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1276520 win 65535 > 000008 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1276520 win 65535 > 000134 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1272572:1273888(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1276520 win 65535 > 000144 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1273888:1275204(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1276520 win 65535 > 000145 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1275204:1276520(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000003 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1276520:1277836(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1276520 win 65535 > 000142 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1277836:1279152(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1279152 win 65535 > 000152 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1279152:1280468(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000149 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1280468:1281784(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000003 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1276520:1277836(1316) ack 1 win 4096 <--- dup data? > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1281784 win 65535 > 000007 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1281784 win 65535 <--- a dup ack after only 7 usec? > 000135 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1277836:1279152(1316) ack 1 win 4096 <--- dup data even though it was acked? > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1281784 win 65535 <--- another dup ack? > 000144 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1279152:1280468(1316) ack 1 win 4096 <--- another dup data? > 000003 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1280468:1281784(1316) ack 1 win 4096 <--- another dup data? > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1281784 win 65535 <--- and another dup ack? > 000005 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1281784 win 65535 <--- yet another dup ack? > 000137 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1281784:1283100(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000158 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1283100:1284416(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1284416 win 65535 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 03:03:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C9D16A415 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=04716242b2@iecc.com) Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B34943D5A for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:03:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=04716242b2@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 4065 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2006 03:03:17 -0000 Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail2.iecc.com with QMQP; 19 Nov 2006 03:03:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Nov 2006 03:03:17 -0000 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:03:17 -0500 (EST) From: John L To: Rachel Florentine In-Reply-To: <20061118222254.13976.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20061118220037.R62578@simone.iecc.com> References: <20061118222254.13976.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cleverness: None detected MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Qmail & Vpopmail From Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:03:20 -0000 > John, there's a rationalle for using ports, you know. A very, very > strong argument in favor of them. In general I agree. The qmail port, unlike most of the other ports, is junk. > Would you mind telling me how to get vpopmail working? If you really want to know, please read chapter 13 of my qmail book. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 03:18:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A263016A47C for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D500943D78 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:18:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:18:47 -0500 id 00056467.455FCD17.00005576 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:18:46 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com Message-Id: <20061118221846.3ae8c1ee.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200611182020.UAA03897@sopwith.solgatos.com> References: <200611182020.UAA03897@sopwith.solgatos.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:18:53 -0000 My comments are based both on the packet dump here and the source code you posted earlier ... On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:20:33 +0000 Dieter wrote: > In the tcpdump output below, the src machine is sending data to the > bsd machine. At one point during this test, the bsd machine is slowly > falling behind, as shown in the smaller and smaller window size. > > It looks like at one point, the bsd machine takes 5.5 seconds to > ack a packet. :-( Am I interpreting the -ttt delta time correctly? I think so. My guess would be that your process blocked on stdout. You don't mention what you're doing with stdout from the program, are you just letting it scroll on the terminal, or redirecting it to a file? In any case, if stdout blocks (because the disk is slow, for example) your recv buffer will fill up until your program can get the data written. As an experiment, try running the process and redirecting stdout to /dev/null -- if it doesn't exhibit the problem, then you need to look at where you're actually storing the data and speed that part up. Is the data coming in at a fairly constant rate? If not, and you're only having trouble when it bursts, you can work around this by keeping a ring buffer and doing non-blocking writes. It'll make your code more complex, but it will allow your program to absorb some of the bursting data and keep the window from closing -- especially if you've got plenty of RAM. If this is a constant rate of data, however, you're going to need a faster way to store or process or whatever you do with it as it comes in. > Getsockopt() says bsd machine's send buffer = 33580, rec buffer = 197100 > Is there a way for the bsd machine to find out what the src machine's > send buffer size is? I don't know of any way but to ask them. Again, it will only help if it's a bursting problem. If your receiving process is unable to keep up with the required throughput, eventually you'll block and the other end will run out of buffer space. > I doubt that it is large enough for 5.5 seconds' > worth of data, but it would be nice to know what the goal is. > > Towards the end of the log, it looks to me like both sides are a > bit quick to resend data and acks? > > 000016 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1201508 win 65535 > 000641 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1201508:1202824(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000780 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1202824:1204140(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1204140 win 65535 > 000953 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1204140:1205456(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000938 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1205456:1206772(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1206772 win 65535 > 000640 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1206772:1208088(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000781 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1208088:1209404(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1209404 win 62903 > 001110 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1209404:1210720(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000780 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1210720:1212036(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1212036 win 60271 > 000641 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1212036:1213352(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000782 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1213352:1214668(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1214668 win 57639 > 000953 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1214668:1215984(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000941 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1215984:1217300(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1217300 win 55007 > 000952 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1217300:1218616(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000781 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1218616:1219932(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1219932 win 52375 > 000798 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1219932:1221248(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000794 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1221248:1222564(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1222564 win 49743 > 000646 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1222564:1223880(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000933 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1223880:1225196(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1225196 win 47111 > 000954 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1225196:1226512(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000625 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1226512:1227828(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1227828 win 44479 > 000798 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1227828:1229144(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000936 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1229144:1230460(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1230460 win 41847 > 000953 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1230460:1231776(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000624 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1231776:1233092(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1233092 win 39215 > 000797 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1233092:1234408(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000780 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1234408:1235724(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1235724 win 36583 > 000953 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1235724:1237040(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000937 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1237040:1238356(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1238356 win 33951 > 000641 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1238356:1239672(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 001092 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1239672:1240988(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1240988 win 31319 > 000796 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1240988:1242304(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000626 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1242304:1243620(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1243620 win 28687 > 000952 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1243620:1244936(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000783 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1244936:1246252(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000015 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1246252 win 26055 > 000797 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1246252:1247568(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000937 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1247568:1248884(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1248884 win 23423 > 000797 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1248884:1250200(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000938 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1250200:1251516(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1251516 win 20791 > 000642 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1251516:1252832(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000782 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1252832:1254148(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1254148 win 18159 > 000797 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1254148:1255464(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 001251 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1255464:1256780(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000014 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1256780 win 15527 > 000640 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1256780:1258096(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000937 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1258096:1259412(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1259412 win 12895 > 000797 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1259412:1260728(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000945 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1260728:1262044(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1262044 win 10263 > 000640 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1262044:1263360(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000952 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1263360:1264676(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000014 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1264676 win 7631 > 000796 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1264676:1265992(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000938 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1265992:1267308(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000011 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1267308 win 4999 > 000801 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1267308:1268624(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000936 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1268624:1269940(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1269940 win 2367 > 000798 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1269940:1271256(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 099460 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1271256 win 1051 <-- window smaller than 1316 > 5. 537213 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1271256 win 4096 <-- does this mean 5.5 seconds? :-( > 000027 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1271256 win 31744 > 000026 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1271256 win 57088 > 000024 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1271256 win 65535 > 000333 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1271256:1272572(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000006 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1272572:1273888(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000034 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1273888 win 65535 > 000113 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1273888:1275204(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000157 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1275204:1276520(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000003 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1271256:1272572(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1276520 win 65535 > 000008 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1276520 win 65535 > 000134 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1272572:1273888(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1276520 win 65535 > 000144 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1273888:1275204(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1276520 win 65535 > 000145 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1275204:1276520(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000003 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1276520:1277836(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1276520 win 65535 > 000142 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1277836:1279152(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1279152 win 65535 > 000152 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1279152:1280468(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000149 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1280468:1281784(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000003 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1276520:1277836(1316) ack 1 win 4096 <--- dup data? > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1281784 win 65535 > 000007 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1281784 win 65535 <--- a dup ack after only 7 usec? > 000135 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1277836:1279152(1316) ack 1 win 4096 <--- dup data even though it was acked? > 000013 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1281784 win 65535 <--- another dup ack? > 000144 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1279152:1280468(1316) ack 1 win 4096 <--- another dup data? > 000003 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1280468:1281784(1316) ack 1 win 4096 <--- another dup data? > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1281784 win 65535 <--- and another dup ack? > 000005 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1281784 win 65535 <--- yet another dup ack? > 000137 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1281784:1283100(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000158 IP src.rfe > bsd.12340: P 1283100:1284416(1316) ack 1 win 4096 > 000012 IP bsd.12340 > src.rfe: . ack 1284416 win 65535 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 02:23:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F7716A40F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathan_p_maier@comcast.net) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.200.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BD643D53 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:23:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nathan_p_maier@comcast.net) Received: from smailcenter43.comcast.net ([204.127.205.143]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <2006111902233301300atmsue>; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:23:33 +0000 Received: from [24.15.72.99] by smailcenter43.comcast.net; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:23:33 +0000 From: nathan_p_maier@comcast.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:23:33 +0000 Message-Id: <111920060223.3020.455FC0250002F77800000BCC22007637049D0A070E03A19FA1020E089B0E02@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 4 2006) X-Authenticated-Sender: bmF0aGFuX3BfbWFpZXJAY29tY2FzdC5uZXQ= X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:57:17 +0000 Subject: using NetGear wireless usb adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:23:35 -0000 Hi, I have a NetGear WG111 usb wireless network adapter. Is there any way to use this? I get the ugen0: with the name of the adapter. How much further can I get? What's the next step? Thankyou, Nathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 02:54:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D57E16A40F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 462B443D5D for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:54:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 23544 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Nov 2006 02:54:52 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lSIFRt9VStlIdXxLYLOobL5Nh+SmLkfXQcMKLUXEOG4uIp54WmoBXp7j0W64Ax1E8gshGKJyG7UWAkwk2RqZGut8rvZ7M+AH0aRWLgcNWN9/yoguXQLJ62pAMZuhnub76FMNLpUO9Eq1eC3PoYEBMVK20yelX2hcFK+u60z6oF4= ; Message-ID: <20061119025452.23542.qmail@web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.19.14.31] by web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:54:52 PST Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:54:52 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: Tom Ierna MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:57:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Qmail & Vpopmail From Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:54:53 -0000 7883----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Tom Ierna =0A= > I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the instruct= ions=0A> from qmailrocks and most recently using the instructions found her= e:=0A>=0A=0A> http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/install.shtml108=0A= >=0A=0A> The "toaster" method seems to me to be the most comprehensive, and= you can =0A> use (or not use) ports as you see fit.=0A=0A=0Amake test resu= lted in this:=0A=0AFailed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List = of Failed=0A---------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------=0At/Toaster.t 1 256 41 1 2.44% 22=0A= t/toaster-watcher.t 1 256 23 1 4.35% 21=0A7 tests and 5 subte= sts skipped.=0AFailed 2/24 test scripts, 91.67% okay. 2/364 subtests failed= , 99.45% okay.=0A*** Error code 255=0A=0AStop in /usr/local/Mail-Toaster-5.= 03.=0A=0AI'm "toast".=0ARachel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A_______________________= _____________________________________________________________=0ASponsored L= ink=0A=0A$200,000 mortgage for $660/ mo - =0A30/15 yr fixed, reduce debt - = =0Ahttp://yahoo.ratemarketplace.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 04:22:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E280316A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:22:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57806.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57806.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F0B243D49 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:21:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 27718 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Nov 2006 04:22:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lj0+7FbgbNRa3uYuakFPloeI3hrEgdrIOfRsFwCh5LKbyP9NI1HT2fzHuYtjFsVwNbO+E1IIFJ0Pyk+MJOEHoOi+UFrfOwZkp5MlkKfz3NV/ZlqgKKOqtmeyXLtxO+3LcSJzPxgQo9wLS7do0fpekZju4fHt+yhkmkgC8lPoeR8= ; Message-ID: <20061119042201.27716.qmail@web57806.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.19.14.31] by web57806.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:22:01 PST Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:22:01 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: John L MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Qmail & Vpopmail From Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:22:03 -0000 ----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: John L =0A=0A> In gener= al I agree. The qmail port, unlike most of the other ports, is =0A> junk.= =0A=0A=0A=0AI didn't realize you're the author of O'Reilly's book on Qmail = :)=0AI'll take your opinion a little more seriously.=0AI noticed that altho= ugh I have all my processes up:=0A=0Aroot@server167:/var/log/qmail (105) ps= |grep qmail=0A 368 con- S 0:00.15 supervise qmail-send=0A 370 con- S= 0:00.16 supervise qmail-smtpd=0A 804 con- S 0:00.00 qmail-lspaw= n ./Mailbox=0A 2068 p0 D+ 0:00.00 grep qmail=0A=0Anothing new seems t= o have been added into any of the "current" logs! Is there a way to build q= mail with ports, configuring it around the problems? If not, the reason I'm= doing this is to get ezmlm-idx up. How do you recommend I build?=0ATIA,=0A= Rachel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A__________________________________________________= __________________________________=0ASponsored Link=0A=0AMortgage rates nea= r 39yr lows. =0A$420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment! =0Awww.LowerMyB= ills.com/lre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 04:23:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5126116A416 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andras@kende.com) Received: from kende.com (ns1.kende.com [206.123.69.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8ED3B43D55 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:23:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andras@kende.com) Received: (qmail 43686 invoked by uid 0); 19 Nov 2006 04:24:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ak) (postmaster@kende.com@72.129.64.138) by ns1.kende.com with ESMTPA; 19 Nov 2006 04:24:00 -0000 From: "Andras Kende" To: "'Rachel Florentine'" , Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:23:45 -0800 Message-ID: <000601c70b92$80da7640$0505a8c0@ak> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: AccLV4VP5z9Zm8M4SLesruNV+x4hVgAOrasg In-Reply-To: <20061118211920.47748.qmail@web57804.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: RE: Qmail & Vpopmail From Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:23:56 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Rachel Florentine Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 1:19 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Qmail & Vpopmail From Ports Hi; I've installed both qmail and vpopmail from ports. Qmail is up and running because of the great instructions provided. But I haven't figured out how to get vpopmail up (and, of course, working with qmail). Please help. Rachel Hi Rachel, Here is a simpler toaster howto, which worked perfectly for me : http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/mailserver/qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin .php Andras Kende http://www.kende.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 04:54:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE5216A415 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@shockergroup.com) Received: from genset.shockergroup.com (mail.shockergroup.com [66.129.102.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2530243D55 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:54:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@shockergroup.com) Received: (qmail 78749 invoked by uid 89); 19 Nov 2006 04:51:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.6?) (tom@schedatech.com@65.35.29.196) by mail.shockergroup.com with ESMTPA; 19 Nov 2006 04:51:52 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20061119025452.23542.qmail@web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20061119025452.23542.qmail@web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6608C756-216F-4C96-BF50-314DEBD10501@shockergroup.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tom Ierna Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:54:36 -0500 To: Rachel Florentine X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Qmail & Vpopmail From Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:54:29 -0000 On Nov 18, 2006, at 9:54 PM, Rachel Florentine wrote: > make test resulted in this: > > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > t/Toaster.t 1 256 41 1 2.44% 22 > t/toaster-watcher.t 1 256 23 1 4.35% 21 > 7 tests and 5 subtests skipped. > Failed 2/24 test scripts, 91.67% okay. 2/364 subtests failed, > 99.45% okay. > *** Error code 255 > > Stop in /usr/local/Mail-Toaster-5.03. > > I'm "toast". > Rachel IIRC, when installing for the first time, there were "make test" errors, but they all worked themselves out once all installation and configuration was complete. -- Tom Ierna President Shockergroup, Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 05:10:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8C716A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F6443D5F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:09:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5F2CD5098F; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:10:01 -0500 (EST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061119051003.5F2CD5098F@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:10:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2006-10-29 - 2006-11-18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:10:06 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 05:21:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291F516A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5094E43D45 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:21:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so734046pyh for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:21:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=WdzYQ43oj7xirp7XDVOUcRSOEhQToYvXlzO9E2D6fLEduMrLKn3lfwYxU3R1BKPjSi8LJR/g/jV5LVsw0cexQp7ALirdqt/NjqAs5p58zxZAww/dq9jEWjUamYgGC8ixtNFlKA9y0co6HAjfCVtkbzb/WRXEREdsWgtBL0KOjDQ= Received: by 10.35.115.18 with SMTP id s18mr1077740pym.1163913714591; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:21:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.20? ( [75.7.74.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 23sm4858098nzn.2006.11.18.21.21.53; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:21:54 -0800 (PST) From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:20:57 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061119025452.23542.qmail@web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061119025452.23542.qmail@web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611182320.57143.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: Rachel Florentine Subject: Re: Qmail & Vpopmail From Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:21:57 -0000 On Saturday 18 November 2006 20:54, Rachel Florentine wrote: > 7883----- Original Message ---- > From: Tom Ierna > > > I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the > > instructions from qmailrocks and most recently using the instructions > > found here: > > > > > > http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/install.shtml108 > > > > > > The "toaster" method seems to me to be the most comprehensive, and you > > can use (or not use) ports as you see fit. > > make test resulted in this: > > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >---- t/Toaster.t 1 256 41 1 2.44% 22 > t/toaster-watcher.t 1 256 23 1 4.35% 21 > 7 tests and 5 subtests skipped. > Failed 2/24 test scripts, 91.67% okay. 2/364 subtests failed, 99.45% okay. > *** Error code 255 > > Stop in /usr/local/Mail-Toaster-5.03. > > I'm "toast". > Rachel > > To run that script and install the toaster, you are going to find that you need to install one heck of a lot of perl programs. You did see the part at the very beginning about installing perl, correct? It's not just install perl, that's the easy part, it's all the other perl helper programs that need to be installed. A very much easier method to install is located here: http://freebsdrocks.net/ Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 05:33:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC8D16A415 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C34343D5F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:32:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E119E5FF6; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:32:59 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMCCZAhZ56u6; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:32:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-95-165.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.95.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA1A5CB9; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:32:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <455FEC87.6030007@mac.com> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:32:55 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darrel References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system updates, as affected by securelevel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:33:01 -0000 Darrel wrote: > With OpenBSD securelevel=2 I can install a kernel, make build, and > install programs which are compiled using Systrace. > > What is the highest securelevel that I can configure on RELENG_6_2 > which will not affect compiling and installing; e.g., perhaps not > much local difference but having to reboot for a firewall change? > This installation is new and the AUDIT option will be in the kernel. securelevel = 0. Because the kernel is installed using the schg flag: if you have securelevel set to 1 or higher, you will not be able to over-write the kernel without rebooting into single-user mode. See "man init" for details. [ Of course, reinstalling the kernel and/or world is something which you are encouraged to do under single-user mode... ] -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 07:43:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6EB16A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:43:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-237-135.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.237.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1F343D49 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:43:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAJ7htnk018623 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:43:55 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.7/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kAJ7htlk018620 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:43:55 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id HAA04640; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:42:31 GMT Message-Id: <200611190742.HAA04640@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:02:48 CST." <20061119020247.GB15898@dan.emsphone.com> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:42:31 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:43:44 -0000 Dan writes: Dan> A shrinking window and no packet loss is an indication that the program Dan> the socket is connected to isn't reading data fast enough. If you're Dan> locally gzipping the output of a remote backup, for example, you'll see Dan> this. Just a tight loop reading the socket and writing to stdout, which is directed into a file on disk. Dan> The completely duplicated data packets from the sender, even before any Dan> perceived packet loss, are troubling. Either the sender decided to Dan> resend that data on its own, or the packet was duplicated by a router Dan> or switch in transit. Dumps of the same stream from both sender and Dan> receiver would help, as would enabling rfc 1323 extensions on both Dan> systems (which will put a timestamp value on each packet and enable Dan> SACK. It's enabled by default on FreeBSD). No router or switch, just a piece of wire. net.inet.tcp.rfc1323: 1 Bill writes: Bill> My guess would be that your process blocked on stdout. Bill> You don't mention what you're doing with stdout from the program, are Bill> you just letting it scroll on the terminal, or redirecting it to a file? Just redirected to a file. FFS, soft updates, 7200 rpm SATA drive with the disk's write cache turned off. Input data rate is less than 20 M bits/sec. I can write to the disk at approx 6 M Bytes/sec sustained. (or 10x that with disk write cache turned on, but I don't like trashed filesystems after the machine goes down hard) The machine and the disk are plenty fast enough, AMD64, 2 GB main memory. CPU is 90-something percent idle. Sometimes it works fine for extended periods, 30-40 minutes. Other times the src box reports thousands of network errors. So far I haven't figured out what the difference is between the working tests and the failing tests. The crontab directory is empty, so it shouldn't be cron jobs. > As an experiment, try running the process and redirecting > stdout to /dev/null -- if it doesn't exhibit the problem, then you > need to look at where you're actually storing the data and speed that > part up. I've thought of trying /dev/null but haven't yet. It might provide a clue. I would expect that the filesystem should be buffering the write from short term disk latency. Surely FreeBSD 6.0 provides the classic Unix write-behind? The disk activity LED flashes constantly, so it doesn't appear to be saving up disk writes and then doing a bunch at once, > Is the data coming in at a fairly constant rate? Yes. > you've got plenty of RAM The machine has 2 GB. I wonder if the process is getting its fair share? I have been observing other problems where disk activity to one disk will make an unrelated process reading data from a different disk *very* unresponsive. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 08:10:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C766816A538 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from havoc.unixathome.org (havoc.unixathome.org [66.154.98.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3683643D5E for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:09:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FEB56457 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:10:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from havoc.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (havoc.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nT41Dd-QXdRB for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AF54E56433; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:10:01 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061119081001.AF54E56433@havoc.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:10:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2006-10-29 - 2006-11-18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:10:00 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 09:34:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C56216A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:34:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from belomestnov@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01F643D53 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:34:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from belomestnov@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout13/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kAJ9Y8lH025482 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:34:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.60.117.70] (ppp-29-251.utech.ru [80.86.251.29] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kAJ9XgWd028866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:34:07 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <10B85DC5-2B64-4878-8D97-91C0E3F0A027@mac.com> From: Evgeniy Belomestnov Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:34:07 +0300 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Sendmail and network aliases X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:34:12 -0000 Hello! I have FreeBSD-6.1 machine with two network interfaces: one for private network, one for internet. Network interface for internet has some aliases. I need to configure mail relay for some domains at this computer. Can I configure my MTA (Sendmail) to send e-mail for different domains via particular network interface but with different IP-addresses (aliases)? For example, to send e-mail for DOMAIN1 via INTEREFACE1.ALIAS1, for DOMAIN2 via INTERFACE1.ALIAS2, for DOMAIN3 via INTERFACE1.ALIAS3 and so on. Best regards, Evgeniy Belomestnov belomestnov@mac.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 10:22:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFADE16A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:22:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: from sun.schedom-europe.net (sun.schedom-europe.net [193.109.184.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A6A343D5A for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:22:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: (qmail 18355 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2006 10:36:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO laptop) (83.101.7.30) by sun.schedom-europe.net with SMTP; 19 Nov 2006 10:36:25 -0000 From: Beni To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:22:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 X-Face: %*c?V7%A[c.}s2rI*TaRWm-[I-, ZLpBKmmC-@)J}KGbr)=a, TsXSA=:ArC(<=?utf-8?q?v=5C/=5F=25BaB=24K=0A=09=24=60E=7D6=7EyjIqu/SN=3A=24Pb=7DGngR+8=3D?= =?utf-8?q?dE=60?=)V~48zl6) =?utf-8?q?BhEtfQ2=3D=7ChScx=3Frn30d!QMd=3F=2E=60/hR!l+=0A=09x?=(]+zXesMf?'W[>46aPKMAAwd7eT{X_O9besb[u]'Y(DAe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611191122.19230.beni@brinckman.info> Subject: sysutils/coreutils upgrade error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:22:24 -0000 Hi, When doing an "portmaster -a -i -v", the sysutils/coreutils port needs to be updated. But I'm getting the following error. How do I get past this ? Thanks, Beni. www# pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 499 packages found (-12 +11) (...)........... done] www# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils/ www# make deinstall ===> Deinstalling for sysutils/coreutils ===> coreutils not installed, skipping www# make && make install clean ===> Installing for coreutils-6.4 ===> coreutils-6.4 depends on shared library: intl - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if sysutils/coreutils already installed Making install in src gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils/work/coreutils-6.4/src' gmake install-am gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils/work/coreutils-6.4/src' gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils/work/coreutils-6.4/src' test -z "/usr/local/bin" || /usr/local/bin/gmkdir -p "/usr/local/bin" /usr/local/bin/gmkdir: not found gmake[3]: *** [install-binPROGRAMS] Error 127 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils/work/coreutils-6.4/src' gmake[2]: *** [install-am] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils/work/coreutils-6.4/src' gmake[1]: *** [install] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils/work/coreutils-6.4/src' gmake: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils. www# whereis gmkdir gmkdir: www# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 12:29:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AD416A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: from kim-out.schedom-europe.net (kim.schedom-europe.net [193.109.184.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9597043D58 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:28:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: (qmail 21281 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2006 12:29:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kim.schedom-europe.net) (193.109.184.78) by kim.schedom-europe.net with SMTP; 19 Nov 2006 12:29:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 21235 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2006 12:28:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO laptop) (83.101.7.30) by kim.schedom-europe.net with SMTP; 19 Nov 2006 12:28:59 -0000 From: Beni To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:28:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 X-Face: %*c?V7%A[c.}s2rI*TaRWm-[I-, ZLpBKmmC-@)J}KGbr)=a, TsXSA=:ArC(<=?utf-8?q?v=5C/=5F=25BaB=24K=0A=09=24=60E=7D6=7EyjIqu/SN=3A=24Pb=7DGngR+8=3D?= =?utf-8?q?dE=60?=)V~48zl6) =?utf-8?q?BhEtfQ2=3D=7ChScx=3Frn30d!QMd=3F=2E=60/hR!l+=0A=09x?=(]+zXesMf?'W[>46aPKMAAwd7eT{X_O9besb[u]'Y(DAe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611191328.58426.beni@brinckman.info> X-Antivirus: This mail has been scanned for viruses by schedom vof (http://www.dommel.com) Subject: error in portupgrading audio/amarok X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:29:03 -0000 Hi, When trying to portupgrade amarok, I'm getting the following error. I did already a "make config" and unchecked the iPod option cause I don't need the iPod support. But the upgrade still fails. Any hints on how to get audio/amarok upgraded please? Thankx, Beni. [...] Making all in ipod gmake[5]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/audio/amarok/work/amarok-1.4.4/amarok/src/mediadevice/ipod' /usr/X11R6/bin/moc ./ipodmediadevice.h -o ipodmediadevice.moc if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=CXX c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../.. -I../../../../amarok/src -I../../../../amarok/src -I../../../../amarok/src/amarokcore -I../../../../amarok/src/amarokcore -I../../../../amarok/src/engine -I../../../../amarok/src/engine -I../../../../amarok/src/mediadevice -I/usr/local/include/gpod-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/taglib -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -D_GETOPT_H -D_THREAD_SAFE -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -MT ipodmediadevice.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/ipodmediadevice.Tpo" -c -o ipodmediadevice.lo ipodmediadevice.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/ipodmediadevice.Tpo" ".deps/ipodmediadevice.Plo"; else rm -f ".deps/ipodmediadevice.Tpo"; exit 1; fi /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX c++ -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -o libamarok_ipod-mediadevice.la -rpath /usr/local/lib/kde3 -avoid-version -module -no-undefined -R /usr/local/lib -R /usr/local/lib -R /usr/X11R6/lib -R /usr/X11R6/lib -R /usr/local/lib -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -L/usr/local/lib -lgpod -lglib-2.0 -liconv -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -L/usr/local/lib ipodmediadevice.lo ../../../../amarok/src/libamarok.la -Wl,-export-dynamic -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -ljpeg -L/usr/X11R6/lib grep: /usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la: No such file or directory sed: /usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la' is not a valid libtool archive gmake[5]: *** [libamarok_ipod-mediadevice.la] Error 1 gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/audio/amarok/work/amarok-1.4.4/amarok/src/mediadevice/ipod' gmake[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/audio/amarok/work/amarok-1.4.4/amarok/src/mediadevice' gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/audio/amarok/work/amarok-1.4.4/amarok/src' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/audio/amarok/work/amarok-1.4.4/amarok' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/audio/amarok/work/amarok-1.4.4' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/audio/amarok. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.25870.68 env PORT_UPGRADE=yes make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! audio/amarok (amarok-1.4.3_3) (missing header) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 106 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed www# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 12:47:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A2A16A412 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AF143D4C for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:46:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so791249pyh for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:47:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=VWMBPg1HZub5pAHzBDsktVYnPa6/etI3uwFz6p398jRGOw1RRyayscEenvhCwJTYFcMceHr0OaGHttin5ACkTU+ViiCwhy0gB4WkcbnCjXhPfbsSP/AymB+l5ihevLNKLWbwkfzG5xEByzeMaTXo/NAlkrmSfzHRJL8Nfo3EpYA= Received: by 10.35.79.3 with SMTP id g3mr6283882pyl.1163940422898; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:47:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:47:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611190447i12f3a917le8dded55557101ed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:47:02 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Installworld Problem... Please help!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:47:04 -0000 Hello, Please help!!! I have CVSup'ed my 6.1 Fresh Install. No problems with buildworld or kernel build, but I am getting failures during installworld. When I give this command in single user mode: # make installworld A Partial output of the Screen Dump cd /usr/src/etc; make distrib-dirs mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p / mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist -p /usr mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist -p /var/named mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist -p / cd /; rm -f /sys; ln -s usr/src/sys sys rm: /sys: Read-only file system *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/etc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. # Information about my FSTAB: # cat /etc/fstab # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/mfid0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/mfid0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/mfid0s1g /home ufs rw 2 2 /dev/mfid0s1e /tmp ufs rw 2 2 /dev/mfid0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/mfid0s1d /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro, noauto 0 0 -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 13:52:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A5A16A416 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E01243D72 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:52:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so734822nzh for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:52:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=eTZl1qlXFxBzpkM2Jq/lvq0e9qROVxfJgCQFw5JqteyJaAuWO4gu4WJmB2RhLXAH2/5MbUQGAsdPU9b9CdyIZA3mvHJ/nIhdcSMeG4l0UpTrdYq7ndkexnRvCfdXp5j+IM1l1dAEYvfKujb4ho7GhC7brBWORs3Y8DZS+5Ni8xE= Received: by 10.64.241.3 with SMTP id o3mr6093687qbh.1163944350949; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:52:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.20? ( [75.7.74.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q14sm7735894qbq.2006.11.19.05.52.30; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:52:30 -0800 (PST) From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:51:33 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <2cd0a0da0611190447i12f3a917le8dded55557101ed@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611190447i12f3a917le8dded55557101ed@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611190751.33237.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: VeeJay Subject: Re: Installworld Problem... Please help!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:52:36 -0000 On Sunday 19 November 2006 06:47, VeeJay wrote: > Hello, > > Please help!!! > I have CVSup'ed my 6.1 Fresh Install. No problems with buildworld or kernel > build, but I am getting failures > during installworld. When I give this command in single user mode: > > # make installworld > > A Partial output of the Screen Dump > > cd /usr/src/etc; make distrib-dirs > mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p / > mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var > mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist -p /usr > mtree -eU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist -p /var/named > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist -p / > cd /; rm -f /sys; ln -s usr/src/sys sys > rm: /sys: Read-only file system > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/etc. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > # > > > Information about my FSTAB: > > # cat /etc/fstab > # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# > /dev/mfid0s1b none swap sw 0 0 > /dev/mfid0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 > /dev/mfid0s1g /home ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/mfid0s1e /tmp ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/mfid0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/mfid0s1d /var ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro, noauto 0 0 What are you doing to go into single user mode? It looks like your not mounting in r/w. The handbook Section 21.4.5, gives a very good method (two actually) of what to do. I used to use the first, I have used the second for several years. Try that. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 15:05:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9F416A40F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AAC43D45 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:05:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:05:35 -0500 id 0005647A.456072BF.00008F5C Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:05:34 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Dieter Message-Id: <20061119100534.a37a6e5c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200611190742.HAA04640@sopwith.solgatos.com> References: <20061119020247.GB15898@dan.emsphone.com> <200611190742.HAA04640@sopwith.solgatos.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:05:37 -0000 On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:42:31 +0000 Dieter wrote: [snip] > Bill writes: > > Bill> My guess would be that your process blocked on stdout. > Bill> You don't mention what you're doing with stdout from the program, are > Bill> you just letting it scroll on the terminal, or redirecting it to a file? > > Just redirected to a file. FFS, soft updates, 7200 rpm SATA drive > with the disk's write cache turned off. Input data rate is less > than 20 M bits/sec. I can write to the disk at approx 6 M Bytes/sec > sustained. (or 10x that with disk write cache turned on, but > I don't like trashed filesystems after the machine goes down hard) > The machine and the disk are plenty fast enough, AMD64, 2 GB main memory. > CPU is 90-something percent idle. > > Sometimes it works fine for extended periods, 30-40 minutes. Other times > the src box reports thousands of network errors. So far I haven't figured > out what the difference is between the working tests and the failing tests. > The crontab directory is empty, so it shouldn't be cron jobs. > > > As an experiment, try running the process and redirecting > > stdout to /dev/null -- if it doesn't exhibit the problem, then you > > need to look at where you're actually storing the data and speed that > > part up. > > I've thought of trying /dev/null but haven't yet. It might provide > a clue. > > I would expect that the filesystem should be buffering the write > from short term disk latency. Surely FreeBSD 6.0 provides the > classic Unix write-behind? > > The disk activity LED flashes constantly, so it doesn't appear to be > saving up disk writes and then doing a bunch at once, > > > Is the data coming in at a fairly constant rate? > > Yes. > > > you've got plenty of RAM > > The machine has 2 GB. I wonder if the process is getting its fair share? > I have been observing other problems where disk activity to one disk > will make an unrelated process reading data from a different disk *very* > unresponsive. Sounds like a hardware problem to me. If you've got a crappy SATA controller that's going to block every now and again, you're going to have trouble with this. It's not something impossible to work around. I get the impression that this machine is doing little or nothing other than receiving this data. If that's that case, you can use the entire 2G for buffering, and store incomming data until the disk starts responding again. I don't know off the top of my head, but I seriously doubt if the OS is going to use 2G to buffer disk writes. You, however, can. As your program stands, it will buffer a maximum of 15000 bytes, but you're using blocking IO, so that doesn't even help you if the write blocks. If you want to take advantage of all that RAM, you'll have to add some complexity to your program. The following is roughed out, not tested (may contain fenceposts) but liable to work once you fill in the blanks (although it's lacking any error checking) Start by making BUFFER_SIZE _much_ larger -- several megs at least, or even bigger if this machine is dedicated to this task: [...] /* Set stdout to non-blocking */ fnctl(1, O_NONBLOCK); startread = startwrite = buffer; while (1) { /* Wrap around if we're at the end of the buffer */ if (startread == buffer + BUFFER_SIZE) { startread = buffer; } /* Find out how much unused space is currently in the buffer */ if (startwrite >= startread) { avail_buffer = BUFFER_SIZE - startwrite; } else { avail_buffer = startread - startwrite; } /* Read in as much as possible */ num_read = read(fd2, startwrite, avail_buffer); /* move the write pointer */ startwrite += num_read; /* Wrap around if we're at the end of the buffer */ if (startwrite == buffer + BUFFER_SIZE) { startwrite = buffer; } /* Calculate how many bytes we have to write */ if (startwrite <= startread) { readytowrite = startwrite - startread; } else { readytowrite = BUFFER_SIZE - startwrite; } /* Here is the key ... this only works if descriptor 1 is * non-blocking ... otherwise your code will wait here until * all the bytes are written ... you don't want that */ num_written = write(1, startwrite, readytowrite); startwrite += num_written; } From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 16:05:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B15116A4FD for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aharrison@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B951643D81 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:05:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aharrison@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1646199nfc for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:05:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QnU0YLEAMYzhvE2unbj84lDa/PkP8E96+wFXiwovfvwoMtplvuvf28DBJuBormEb1CrtbxwhYWkZ2jHss6OnCAncEGVh0nbcxijSpGIDGg7+1ztTXadpoa8c+z0ws/ZwEpgQ5CFF42IcSwq/98s+tUyIQq+b0w6ujtGK0V7Str0= Received: by 10.78.164.13 with SMTP id m13mr4170706hue.1163952311034; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:05:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.176.14 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:05:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:05:11 -0500 From: "Andy Harrison" To: Beni In-Reply-To: <200611191328.58426.beni@brinckman.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200611191328.58426.beni@brinckman.info> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error in portupgrading audio/amarok X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:05:16 -0000 On 11/19/06, Beni wrote: > Hi, > > When trying to portupgrade amarok, I'm getting the following error. I did > already a "make config" and unchecked the iPod option cause I don't need the > iPod support. But the upgrade still fails. > Any hints on how to get audio/amarok upgraded please? > grep: /usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la: No such file or directory > sed: /usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la: No such file or directory > libtool: link: `/usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la' is not a valid libtool > archive This has to do with the Gnome upgrade. Go here and read the part about using the find command and grepping for old libtool archives on your system. http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html#q2 -- Andy Harrison From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 16:08:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9713816A47B for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:08:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jvk-list@thekrafts.org) Received: from smtpout11-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout11-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [68.178.232.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20F6343D8F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:08:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jvk-list@thekrafts.org) Received: (qmail 23135 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2006 16:08:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gem-wbe14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.189.101) by smtpout11-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with SMTP; 19 Nov 2006 16:08:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 13325 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2006 16:08:25 -0000 Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:08:25 -0700 From: jvk-list@thekrafts.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061119090825.10b6271f30786ad7adcc9756bb6c2f30.822bdce0de.wbe@email.secureserver.net> User-Agent: Web-Based Email 4.8.16 X-Originating-IP: 153.26.176.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Xircom XE2000 card problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:08:34 -0000 Asked this question a couple of days ago in freebsd-mobile, but haven't heard anything. I'm reposting here to, hopefully, a wider audience... I have an Inspiron 7000 laptop I've set up as a FreeBSD server running Version 6.1. I have a Xircom XE2000 ethernet card I'd like to use. It appears to be recognized by FreeBSD, but doesn't startup correctly. In searching I've seen references to it working with FreeBSD, but indicate it should use the xe driver. Here's what the dmesg says: ed1: at port 0x100-0x10f iomem 0x88000000-0x88000fff irq 1 1 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 device_attach: ed1 attach returned 6 Looking at the hardware list it should be supported by the dc or xe drivers, but not the ed driver. Am I missing something easy, or is this card not reallyl supported at all? Thanks, Joe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 16:21:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7069116A412 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EFF43D5C for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:20:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so880272uge for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:20:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=nTygIN98HxUZYeMQnx3oXWyKdqpi/0I7ljCO1w+ldFl32in9Vun/aPHD7OkWtENkxmZeoAgedT87brWJRjD3ohoBZpBpz47tf3sRTTBGnOstcSgBCagIST5Pk8B96EBq/ZPmV5TERpZ7z2NFwWEdv5NVZd5fNRudbMxi1tBr0TY= Received: by 10.67.22.14 with SMTP id z14mr5709448ugi.1163953258421; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:20:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.33? ( [194.125.72.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j3sm6411313ugd.2006.11.19.08.20.57; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:20:58 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <2BBB2437-456D-448E-B9BA-AC90350EA626@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd ORG From: eoghan Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:20:55 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: dvd extractor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:21:00 -0000 Hi Im looking to extract some of my dvd's, not convert to mpeg4 or anything... simply extract the video_ts and audio_ts... Is there any application in the ports tree that can do this for me? I tried dvdrip but it stopped with an error installing mplayer... Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 16:45:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A68C16A4A7 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4803343D76 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:45:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAJGjjvP066543 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:45:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:45:44 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <2BBB2437-456D-448E-B9BA-AC90350EA626@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2BBB2437-456D-448E-B9BA-AC90350EA626@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611191045.44738.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on zeus.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: dvd extractor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:45:54 -0000 On Sunday 19 November 2006 10:20, eoghan wrote: > I tried dvdrip but it stopped with an error installing mplayer... what exactly was the error with mplayer? i had to deselect a few codecs to get mine to install, in the end, i still had a working media player. might be worth your time to play with the make config-recursive in the dvdrip port to see if you can eliminate whichever problem was with mplayer (or, start directly with mplayer, and get that all working, then turn your attention to dvdrip). cheers, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 17:04:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9D216A4AB for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fairwinds@eastlink.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8487943D5C for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:04:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fairwinds@eastlink.ca) Received: from ip04.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.20]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J8Z00JVXM2UKUF1@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:04:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from blk-224-181-0.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.1.250]) ([24.224.181.0]) by ip04.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:04:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:04:23 -0400 From: David Pratt In-reply-to: <20061119010700.GA65368@xor.obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway Message-id: <45608E97.9060608@eastlink.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAFEdYEUY4LUAdGdsb2JhbAANjDsB X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,439,1157338800"; d="scan'208"; a="13299465:sNHT48005181" References: <455F94F4.7010309@eastlink.ca> <20061119003655.GA64411@xor.obsecurity.org> <455FAC19.8010009@eastlink.ca> <20061119010700.GA65368@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Modifying gcc34 makefile to compile with java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:04:31 -0000 Hi Kris. This is a libgcj in gcc issue and have posted to java@gcc.gnu.org list. I see that there is a similar reference to something similar on Darwin platform which has FreeBSD roots. It seems that unwind symbol may be getting introduced into libgcj (so that when compiled produces the error). I believe this symbol provides support for libunwind for specific platforms other than FreeBSD. l'll have to track down the person responsible for the FreeBSD port since they should also be interested in determining a solution. Regards, David Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:58:01PM -0400, David Pratt wrote: >> Hi Kris. I realize the java support prior to 4 requires a ton of RAM to >> compile but I also know the compiler is reasonably good afterwards (from >> other platforms) but have not been successful with FreeBSD at this >> point. >> >> I attempted a few tries at 4.1 an 4.2 today and getting this >> sort of an error using gcj: >> >> /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.0/libgcj.so.8: Undefined symbol "_Unwind_GetIPInfo" >> >> so am looking to try something earlier that is known to work on Linux. > > If I were you I'd focus on solving that error instead. Without more > context I can't help though. > > Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 17:05:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C6816A417 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACC343D86 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:05:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so824201pyh for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:05:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=TMl37zKNhzFyEMPLHrKGQ7Id+WfOSaOlmlwAPPuGY1+H2BAUnjIKwsDYPnLbj1DDfpUf5Sx7lVIkP5790iCr8gbf2TcXHO5U6B3diWmle4kvc2h3DqKKHSWsxz3NEDfT6PK7Zlv9LGIUraQ+6pEjvm6G3GocAqg9VoE69IH8SDc= Received: by 10.35.33.15 with SMTP id l15mr168149pyj.1163955899317; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:04:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:04:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611190904l4f71d2adx618c18321f651f9f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:04:59 +0100 From: VeeJay To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, maanjee@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: How to install security patches from http://www.freebsd.org/security? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:05:35 -0000 Hi How to install security patches from http://www.freebsd.org/security? Thanks for your time... -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 17:15:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7BC16A416 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25A343D68 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:15:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so825463pyh for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:15:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Wt6m/ArVfVR9q8gloi9LThN43oUWIDdwq4rihg/UDTYe2xcLWy5pP2dZvj6ZYMkZ+Z/OcTC+Orz7HepqF0jJZIxv4MZnKwLLthEMG3Tx4FfRjObZfUZvPv6pKevSbqnAAdMsQQ74M2G7lHiHVGzr9Ro7VbdRBWDoC4ftT5xML3U= Received: by 10.35.129.19 with SMTP id g19mr1919956pyn.1163956505015; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:15:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:15:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611190915j64a536dalf174c82c36e6ee4c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:15:04 +0100 From: VeeJay To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, maanjee@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: maxusers ??? (Building Kernel) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:15:31 -0000 Hi I am just building Kernel for my Web Server which do have a pretty heavy traffic. Just wondering that what should I set MAXUSERS in Kernel config file? -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 17:27:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0A716A4C9 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2CE43E07 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:27:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1668430nfc for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:27:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hNXHYFVUoYTXqUZOac95D9+RrKrnX+DqK8aBxHepZJKYfjzAHhdbBXW/g7+Ppc1W3rWG+oZ3Zuobm8VpEIz1vPbkvscRvspya5QbCUCJOFyj6SgJ12L8N6NsrPTrAjfETUD6GB54A6EL7GQ8HAcKvqbsL94ET5Dw31n9Yj43G64= Received: by 10.49.93.13 with SMTP id v13mr4936400nfl.1163957246381; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:27:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from direwolf.5550h.net ( [82.141.61.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g1sm2517428nfe.2006.11.19.09.27.24; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:27:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:27:21 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?5paH6bOl?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061119182721.31b6e88b@direwolf.5550h.net> In-Reply-To: <2BBB2437-456D-448E-B9BA-AC90350EA626@gmail.com> References: <2BBB2437-456D-448E-B9BA-AC90350EA626@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: dvd extractor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:27:58 -0000 > Im looking to extract some of my dvd's, not convert to mpeg4 or > anything... > simply extract the video_ts and audio_ts... Hallo Eoghan, how about vobcopy (/usr/ports/sysutils/vobcopy)? It works fine for me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 17:33:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6200416A47C for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svr_fremont@yahoo.com) Received: from web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B1A943D45 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:33:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svr_fremont@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 53831 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Nov 2006 17:33:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4zqVDaz8g/bQ4J7RCs7Zh2Ysrt08S/f/NvOUQ9B2kcWIyG3K891e4YLvwFKGN+Ix9dpUva8ri6X4xA8UE51PECM7En2nFGhWMmuoC+3gtfGpelry00YKrk1IuIXv5qWEGmVk2aD6R4dmVUL2IjnHVY7G5LJwSytR9PAtK3qe79g= ; Message-ID: <20061119173324.53829.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [71.131.19.108] by web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:33:24 PST Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:33:24 -0800 (PST) From: Ramesh Subrahmaniam To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:33:25 -0000 =0AHi =0A=0AWhere should I be asking questions regarding install ? If th= is is the correct forum I have a Sis648-FX motherboard. =0AI have two hard = drives; one Hitachi and one Western Digital. I also have a BTC DVD-ROM. =0A= =0AIn addtition to this I have two Sil 3112 SATA Controllers on which I hav= e four disks. Overall I have 6 disks. I would like to run Free BSD on it ma= ke it a NAS box. =0A=0AThe 6.1 Production release bootonly.iso and the 6.2 = RC1 bootonly.iso have problems getting to install. When I try to install I = cannot stop the screen from scrolling very very fast. It just seems like so= me unhandled interrupt in a continuous loop. This happens as soon as I see = the Boot from CD image. I cannot see anything meaningful. =0A=0AOther than = removing the Silicon image controllers what should I do. Appreciate any ide= as. =0A=0AThanks=0ARamesh=0A =0A=0A=0A=0A =0A______________________________= ______________________________________________________=0ASponsored Link=0A= =0ACompare mortgage rates for today. =0AGet up to 5 free quotes. =0AWww2.ne= xtag.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 17:52:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3A516A40F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech@gv.net) Received: from sonic.gv.net (64-142-114-114.colo.sonic.net [64.142.114.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDAC43D70 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:51:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tech@gv.net) Received: from HOMELAPTOP (wl25.gv.net [65.160.10.25]) by sonic.gv.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id kAJHpbf4028216 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:51:38 -0800 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20061119095159.01729998@gv.net> X-Sender: david@gv.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:51:59 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: David McCord Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: chpass -p dilema X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:52:07 -0000 Dear list, I made a error that changed the root password to something unknown. Experimenting, I intended to change the password of pjones, but instead changed the root password since I gave no user argument. As root, I said: chpass -p pjones I logged out then logged back in as my username, then su'd to root. Would not accept the old pw, and wouldn't accept pjones. I'm stuck with an unknown root password. man chpass tells me the argument provided with -p is the encrypted password in crypt format, but doesn't provide enough detail to know where to go from here. I know I can go to the computer and startup in single user and change the root password. This computer is 2 hour round trip for me, which I'd like to avoid. Can anyone help? Thanks, David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 17:52:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FD116A47B for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:52:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from employee_relations-bounces@lists.cacities.org) Received: from flpi101.sbcis.sbc.com (flpi101.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.20.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF32943D80 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:52:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from employee_relations-bounces@lists.cacities.org) X-ORBL: [206.171.59.245] Received: from lists.cacities.org (206-171-59-245.cacities.org [206.171.59.245] (may be forged)) by flpi101.sbcis.sbc.com (8.13.7 out spool5000 dk/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kAJHpQrv006872 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:51:27 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[172.16.15.246]) by lists.cacities.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Glqmn-0006r7-Ie for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:48:57 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: employee_relations-bounces@lists.cacities.org To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: The Mailman Replybot X-Ack: No Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:48:56 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: employee_relations@lists.cacities.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 X-List-Administrivia: yes Sender: employee_relations-bounces@lists.cacities.org Errors-To: employee_relations-bounces@lists.cacities.org Cc: Subject: Auto-response for your message to the "Employee_relations" mailing list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:52:39 -0000 Your message to the Employee Relations ListServe has been received. All messages to this list require approval from the moderator prior for it to being sent out. Thank you for your patience, Mary Creasey Legislative Analyst League of California Cities From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 17:52:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9ACD16A416 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:52:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from employee_relations-bounces@lists.cacities.org) Received: from flpi101.sbcis.sbc.com (flpi101.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.20.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF64043D81 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:52:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from employee_relations-bounces@lists.cacities.org) X-ORBL: [206.171.59.245] Received: from lists.cacities.org (206-171-59-245.cacities.org [206.171.59.245] (may be forged)) by flpi101.sbcis.sbc.com (8.13.7 out spool5000 dk/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kAJHpQPq006875 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:51:27 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[172.16.15.246]) by lists.cacities.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Glqmn-0006r9-OP for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:48:57 -0800 From: employee_relations-owner@lists.cacities.org To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1955996409==" Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:48:56 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: employee_relations@lists.cacities.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 X-List-Administrivia: yes Sender: employee_relations-bounces@lists.cacities.org Errors-To: employee_relations-bounces@lists.cacities.org X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:52:43 -0000 --===============1955996409== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has been automatically rejected. If you think that your messages are being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at employee_relations-owner@lists.cacities.org. --===============1955996409== Content-Type: message/rfc822 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from league-lsnav.cacities.org ([172.16.15.247]) by lists.cacities.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Glqml-0006r2-Kn for employee_relations@lists.cacities.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:48:55 -0800 Received: from freebsd.org ([87.230.176.74]) by league-lsnav.cacities.org (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2006111909510531805 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:51:06 -0800 From: questions@freebsd.org To: employee_relations@lists.cacities.org Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:20:42 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_EDCF5FE1.FA0BF48E" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_EDCF5FE1.FA0BF48E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The original message was received at Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:20:42 -0800 from freebsd.org [23.63.251.99] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- employee_relations@lists.cacities.org ------=_NextPart_000_0000_EDCF5FE1.FA0BF48E-- --===============1955996409==-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 18:32:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FF416A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrieng@nm.cbc.ca) Received: from mail02.nm.cbc.ca (mail02.nm.cbc.ca [159.33.1.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EC743D6B for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:32:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrieng@nm.cbc.ca) Received: from hub.cbc.ca (hub.nm.cbc.ca [192.168.1.119]) by mail02.nm.cbc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23479272CF8; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:32:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost.cbc.ca [127.0.0.1]) by hub.cbc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37906A458; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:32:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from hub.cbc.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hub.cbc.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27230-02-2; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:32:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.30.69.101] (hub.cbc.ca [159.33.1.155]) by hub.cbc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AAA6A44A; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:32:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4560A328.3030308@nm.cbc.ca> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:32:08 -0500 From: Gabriel O'Brien User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David McCord References: <3.0.5.32.20061119095159.01729998@gv.net> In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20061119095159.01729998@gv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.cbc.ca Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: chpass -p dilema X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:32:59 -0000 David, I doubt there's much you're going to be able to do other than reset the password. 'pjones' doesn't look like a valid password hash of any kind so I can't think of a way to crack it even if you wanted to do something like that. Of course I will bow to anybody who has superior knowledge of crypt, etc. as this is not an area with which I have a lot of expertise. From my PoV, essentially what you are trying to do is crack the system at this point and unless you set it up poorly or are incredibly lucky I don't think it's worth the effort to bother, the only advantage you have over a random attacker is knowledge of the (invalid) password hash (and a regular user account to work from). A couple of thoughts: do you use sudo on this system? (If you don't you should consider it when you've resolved this problem, amongst other excellent features which might aid in remote administration, out of the box it only requires you to know your own password to become root.) Is it possible to get somebody local at your datacentre to drop the system into single user mode and change the password? Do you have any other back doors or accounts that run with elevated privs? Even if the datacentre folks are not knowledgeable WRT FreeBSD/Unix you could guide them through the steps required pretty trivially ('boot -s; ; passwd'). Of course there are risks in terms of security, but it all depends on your requirements and the criticality of this system, I know I personally wouldn't want to drive for 2 hours to reset a root password unless I really had to. I only mention this because at my workplace we have operators at our corporate datacentre who are non-technical (at least on our platforms) who we can and do occasionally walk through procedures that require local access when we are dealing with emergencies remotely. Another thought for the future, whenever I do something that might have the potential to lock me out of the root account I make certain I have a second shell open somewhere that I can use to un-fudge whatever I just did and I only sit 7 floors away from most of the servers I'm responsible for and about a 10 minute subway ride from the rest! Don't be too bummed out though, you will probably never do this again... I can't tell you how many commands and utilities I have learned inside out *after* I used them wrong and this one is pretty painless... no data loss! Sorry I'm not of more help... good luck! cheers, Gabriel -- Gabriel O'Brien IT Analyst, MPS-EN-CBC.ca w: 416-205-8740 m: 416-576-0088 David McCord wrote: > Dear list, > > I made a error that changed the root password to something unknown. > Experimenting, I intended to change the password of pjones, but instead > changed the root password since I gave no user argument. As root, I said: > chpass -p pjones > > I logged out then logged back in as my username, then su'd to root. Would > not accept the old pw, and wouldn't accept pjones. I'm stuck with an > unknown root password. > > man chpass tells me the argument provided with -p is the encrypted password > in crypt format, but doesn't provide enough detail to know where to go from > here. I know I can go to the computer and startup in single user and change > the root password. This computer is 2 hour round trip for me, which I'd > like to avoid. Can anyone help? > > Thanks, > David > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 18:58:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C7916A4AB for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9759543DC6 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:57:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1691872nfc for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:57:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L+d/OBxc04H9LMorkQR2YcNVRFbFX73Wv5alTcc7r6oO0szfWRPVVPd+v9N+O8WaVUtsHwbhKcq49czDvDtWVAyzSbvhzPPFngE3Z+7qbNg7Jrusey6gRTRz00SBggNsJCl6cgVrt+7odNlnD7NUauksO4Qn6w+gzfzuRK0p+R4= Received: by 10.82.98.13 with SMTP id v13mr464323bub.1163962634114; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:57:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.175.1 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:57:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:57:13 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611190915j64a536dalf174c82c36e6ee4c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd0a0da0611190915j64a536dalf174c82c36e6ee4c@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maxusers ??? (Building Kernel) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:58:22 -0000 On 11/19/06, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > I am just building Kernel for my Web Server which do have a pretty heavy > traffic. Just wondering that what should I set MAXUSERS in Kernel config > file? Short answer: it depends. Long answer: 0 -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 19:30:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399AA16A412 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jung.christian@inps.de) Received: from backup-mx4.de (backup-mx4.de [80.86.187.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE5B43D49 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:30:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jung.christian@inps.de) Received: from mailgate.inps.de (C9adb.c.strato-dslnet.de [62.104.154.219]) by backup-mx4.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/AIS 08-2006) with ESMTP id kAJJUfEZ002607 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:30:42 GMT Received: from [192.168.210.23] (C9adb.c.strato-dslnet.de [62.104.154.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jung.christian@inps.de) by mailgate.inps.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEEA7E808; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4560B0BA.8060704@inps.de> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:30:02 +0100 From: Christian Jung User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Jung References: <2cd0a0da0611190915j64a536dalf174c82c36e6ee4c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611190915j64a536dalf174c82c36e6ee4c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maxusers ??? (Building Kernel) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:30:45 -0000 On 11/19/06, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > I am just building Kernel for my Web Server which do have a pretty heavy > traffic. Just wondering that what should I set MAXUSERS in Kernel config > file? Short answer: it depends. Long answer: 0 -- -- _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 19:37:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F06B16A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jung.christian@inps.de) Received: from backup-mx3.de (backup-mx3.de [62.112.159.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED8D43E18 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:36:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jung.christian@inps.de) Received: from mailgate.inps.de (C9adb.c.strato-dslnet.de [62.104.154.219]) by backup-mx3.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/AIS 08-2006) with ESMTP id kAJJad9Y016481 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:36:41 GMT Received: from [192.168.210.23] (C9adb.c.strato-dslnet.de [62.104.154.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jung.christian@inps.de) by mailgate.inps.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB587E808 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4560B221.2010904@inps.de> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:36:01 +0100 From: Christian Jung User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0611190915j64a536dalf174c82c36e6ee4c@mail.gmail.com> <4560B0BA.8060704@inps.de> In-Reply-To: <4560B0BA.8060704@inps.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Mistake: Re: maxusers ??? (Building Kernel) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:37:46 -0000 Christian Jung schrieb: > On 11/19/06, VeeJay wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am just building Kernel for my Web Server which do have a pretty heavy >> traffic. Just wondering that what should I set MAXUSERS in Kernel config >> file? > > Short answer: it depends. > Long answer: 0 > Hello, please forgive me my silly mistake. I send the message above erroneously with my address to this list. Please send answers to the original message to maanjee@gmail.com, because i'm not the sender. Thank you. Yours sincerely Christian Jung From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 19:46:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB36516A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:46:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoenix.lists@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4483743E95 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:42:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phoenix.lists@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1703982nfc for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:43:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:face:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mpWf4JXyIH39hXu7DoTluACKab3pwK6z4jP9gtG8Yoieh9xf7Roc82WUtvbIeJc6hIK37fPtnsm1kumAC8v2tfLtZj7ag7qvpbsMwJyNbuqbghroeejRkOC3SHgRmpGlYSKeVzVF6GPH2KNdyx319kQqLkojXulgWJMGuoQj93Q= Received: by 10.49.21.8 with SMTP id y8mr5594512nfi.1163965381003; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:43:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.67.7? ( [85.202.143.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l21sm19352794nfc.2006.11.19.11.42.59; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:43:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4560B3C3.7070203@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:42:59 +0200 From: Simon Phoenix Organization: Phoenix Lab. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061118) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Babiy References: <200611030005.20311.ABabiy@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <200611030005.20311.ABabiy@shaw.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=2569D30B; url=http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/export?id=-8883115982484548853&created=1138842246000 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oUlEQVQY043QsQ2DMBCF4RdRpPQIbBIPlQFcZgxGsaUUlDcCdCkJosES8cXPFkJKFCk0n2z/dwXQ 8uGDWYUsBz7zEO0wLk2AwYgTyXVJdCAv7UlynahDsj7AZqyghV6ukiw0zSQAjidVXxkKEwcieiYr Gi6L3OkKiYgwUQl5Z4QwWWFqKXuyHQkH6tsfpU4/eJq73hA3M+KcL9u1DPivX/cGp2DdNlc2XdMA AAAASUVORK5CYII= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox2 - core dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:46:07 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Andriy Babiy said the following on 03.11.2006 10:05: > Hello everybody, > > After last upgrade of Firefox, it dumps core when I run it. I am not sure, but > the problem might be caused by the additional optimization that I enabled > during configuration. Yes, I have this problem too with additional optimization. > Now, my attempt to "portupgrade -f firefox" results in "Found saved > configuration" - I cannot change this option. > Maybe, someone could advise me on how to do it properly? Where is this "saved > configuration"? Should it be deleted? Or I can give some options to > portupgrade to ignore it? For remove configuration: cd /usr/ports/www/firefox && make rmconfig or simply remove /var/db/ports/firefox2 directory More details: man 7 ports - -- Best regards, Simon Phoenix (Phoenix Lab.) - --------------------------------------------------------------- KeyID: 0x2569D30B Fingerprint: 78FC 5C40 07CC D331 148E CC79 84B8 D514 2569 D30B - --------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFYLO9hLjVFCVp0wsRCra/AKDSCxO7AbXMyq7EbWbGvHdMlJ1ObgCfTk2S UazaLpz6cfQdYt6tFtAMYwk= =Cdjq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 19:51:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA9C16A4A0 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CEEC43E53 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:46:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2006 19:46:49 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (EHLO [192.168.2.5]) [62.59.173.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp042) with SMTP; 19 Nov 2006 20:46:49 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25365336 Message-ID: <4560B4A9.9090804@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:46:49 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Something wrong with the files in /usr/local/include/subversion-1/ ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:51:31 -0000 Hey, Today I tried manually building anjuta2, after getting rid of some errors by fixing FreeBSD specific includes in the anjuta-source files At some point I got this kind of errors: /usr/local/include/subversion-1/svn_io.h:28:17: apr.h: No such file or directory /usr/local/include/subversion-1/svn_io.h:30:25: apr_file_io.h: No such file or directory /usr/local/include/subversion-1/svn_io.h:31:29: apr_thread_proc.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/local/include/subversion-1/svn_delta.h:36, from /usr/local/include/subversion-1/svn_wc.h:44, from /usr/local/include/subversion-1/svn_client.h:39, from svn-backend.h:25, from svn-backend.c:19: So I checked the files in /usr/local/include/subversion-1/ , allmost all of them need some apr files which are included. Allthough none of them can by found when compiling the sources. When I ran a locate I found out the apr files are all in /usr/local/include/apr-1/ . I fixed the compiling errors by just symlinking the files in /usr/local/include/apr-1/ to /usr/local/include but this is just a dirty trick to fool the svn header files. Is there just an include to the apr-1 dir missing in the svn*.h files or am I missing something on my system ? Thanks in advance, -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 20:11:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A09316A47C for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:11:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203CB43D72 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:11:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B861A3C20; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:11:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C047D51515; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:11:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:11:27 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: David Pratt Message-ID: <20061119201127.GA1304@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <455F94F4.7010309@eastlink.ca> <20061119003655.GA64411@xor.obsecurity.org> <455FAC19.8010009@eastlink.ca> <20061119010700.GA65368@xor.obsecurity.org> <45608E97.9060608@eastlink.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45608E97.9060608@eastlink.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Modifying gcc34 makefile to compile with java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:11:42 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 01:04:23PM -0400, David Pratt wrote: > Hi Kris. This is a libgcj in gcc issue and have posted to=20 > java@gcc.gnu.org list. I see that there is a similar reference to=20 > something similar on Darwin platform which has FreeBSD roots. It seems=20 > that unwind symbol may be getting introduced into libgcj (so that when=20 > compiled produces the error). I believe this symbol provides support for= =20 > libunwind for specific platforms other than FreeBSD. l'll have to track= =20 > down the person responsible for the FreeBSD port since they should also= =20 > be interested in determining a solution. They're easy to find, and listed right there in the port makefile :-) Kris --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFYLpvWry0BWjoQKURApgUAJ4nb2dfB3XqJbuRtB2FRWeb2S08nQCg+Nku P8AEvqsQmnmbLE/0XE6mq+E= =tBPg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 20:12:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D282E16A504 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0F543D6D for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:11:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52281A4D86; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:12:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7ECAE51587; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:11:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:11:48 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: VeeJay Message-ID: <20061119201148.GB1304@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <2cd0a0da0611190904l4f71d2adx618c18321f651f9f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5I6of5zJg18YgZEa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611190904l4f71d2adx618c18321f651f9f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to install security patches from http://www.freebsd.org/security? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:12:02 -0000 --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 06:04:59PM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > Hi >=20 > How to install security patches from http://www.freebsd.org/security? The instructions are right there in the advisories. Kris --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFYLqEWry0BWjoQKURApmgAJ0RQl0Jtm/3mlpZVF75AB4+oan7cgCgjkou AI8ltBKKYMiIenYvvpdrToQ= =bOoN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 20:35:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C6E16A407 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keith@gnutux2.fsnet.co.uk) Received: from smtp1.freeserve.com (smtp1.wanadoo.co.uk [193.252.22.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035D143D75 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:35:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keith@gnutux2.fsnet.co.uk) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3009.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id DC7761C0008F; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:35:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from COMPAQ (modem-3526.cougar.dialup.pol.co.uk [217.134.237.198]) by mwinf3009.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id ED16A1C00087; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:35:43 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20061119203543971.ED16A1C00087@mwinf3009.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <005f01c70c1a$4382d840$c6ed86d9@COMPAQ> From: "Keith McKenzie" To: References: <20061119045438.9275F16A580@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:23:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Cc: dkelly@HiWAAY.net Subject: Re: flink_elf_lookup_symbol:missing symbol hash table X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:35:55 -0000 (Digest, Vol 156, Issue 20, msg 18) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:42:29 -0600 From: David Kelly Subject: link_elf_lookup_symbol: missing symbol hash table The most unusual thing about my system configuration would be /boot/ loader.conf: geom_vinum_load=YES # either load these here or statically compile into the kernel: # 3/17/2006 dmk #wlan_wep_load="YES" # used by WEP #wlan_tkip_load="YES" # used by WPA wlan_ccmp_load="YES" # used by WPA2 wlan_xauth_load="YES" #wlan_acl_load="YES" snd_ich_load=YES hw.ata.atapi_dma=1 kern.maxdsiz="2G" kern.dfldsiz="2G" #hw.physmem="2G" # saying this broke things wonderfully, altho true kern.maxssiz="128M" nvidia_load="YES" linux_load="YES" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hello David, I notice you don't have:- sound_load="YES" in your loader.conf file ! Could that be causing the missing hash table message ? (Accidentally deleted ?) Regards Keith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 21:34:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775E016A40F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@stellablue.org) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BE743D53 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:34:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@stellablue.org) Received: from db2.internal (db2.internal [10.202.2.12]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B34BDC916F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:34:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from web4.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.213]) by db2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:34:43 -0500 Received: by web4.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id DF2C6160C13; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:34:43 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1163972083.22652.276496521@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: PBLF45D6c5vdtjpLnvKH/pO4aYJuNFgf2FzUaZNmpot9 1163972083 From: "Steve Brown" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface References: <1163865175.3379.276381343@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1163865175.3379.276381343@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:34:43 -0800 Subject: Re: devfs creates unwanted devices in jail after ruleset applied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@stellablue.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:34:43 -0000 If no one has any ideas, suggestions on perhaps a better place to pose this question? Steve On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:52:55 -0500, "Steve Brown" said: > > I am running a DNS server in a jail and have setup a devfs mount in the > jail to have null and random devices. > > The setup works fine, but once I log out then log back in the pty and > tty devices of my login get created in the jail. Which, of course, I > don't want to happen. To clarify, I'm not talking about "logging into > the jail", this occurs when logging on to the system. The jail is > stripped down, not anywhere close to a virtual server. > > I do the following to create the jail'd devfs at startup: > > mount_devfs devfs JAILDIR/dev > > devfs -m JAILDER/dev rule -s 35 add hide > devfs -m JAILDIR/dev rule -s 35 add path null unhide > devfs -m JAILDIR/dev rule -s 35 add path random unhide > > devfs -m JAILDIR/dev rule -s 35 applyset > > This works great - I get a dev directory setup with just null and > random. But the second anyone logs into the system, whammo all the > sudden pty and tty devices appear inside the jail's /dev directory. > > If anyone would care to unclueless me I would appreciate it. > > Steve > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 21:58:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A2816A403 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@superhero.nl) Received: from superman.superhero.nl (superhero.nl [213.84.142.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B2643D55 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:57:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@superhero.nl) Received: (qmail 89278 invoked by uid 80); 19 Nov 2006 21:58:06 -0000 Received: from 10.202.77.88 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gelsemap) by webmail.superhero.nl with HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:58:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50369.10.202.77.88.1163973486.squirrel@webmail.superhero.nl> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:58:06 +0100 (CET) From: "Gelsema, P \(Patrick\) - FreeBSD" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: make.conf FreeBSD 6.2 RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:58:11 -0000 Hi, I've recently installed 6.2-Beta3 and got KDE working with Xorg. As RC1 is now released I want to upgrade to this version as I have been witnessing some kernel errors and also want to 'play' with the system. I've installed Xorg and KDE from the ports. I am currently creating a make.conf file which should build the world but nothing more than required. I have come up with the following but I am unsure if certain lines shouldn't be commented out. Such as NO_X. As I have build Xorg from the port, should I not build it with the world? Any suggestions are welcome. Thank and regards, Patrick Start of /etc/make.conf NO_I4B= true # do not build isdn4bsd package NO_SHAREDOCS= true # do not build the 4.4BSD legacy docs NO_X= true # do not compile in XWindows support (e.g. doscmd) NOGAMES= true # do not build games (games/ subdir) NOINFO= true # do not make or install info files NO_BLUETOOTH= true # do not build Bluetooth related stuff NO_IPFILTER= true # do not build IP Filter package NO_FORTRAN= true # do not build g77 and related libraries COMPAT4X= yes NOPROFILE=true NO_SENDMAIL=true NO_LPR=true NO_BIND=true # added by use.perl 2006-11-15 21:59:37 PERL_VER=5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 end of /etc/make.conf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 22:01:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BBB16A4B3 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4220543D68 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:00:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from [192.107.41.3] (helo=iglou1.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtp (8.12.5/8.12.5) (envelope-from ) id 1Gluib-0003qD-6p for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:00:53 -0500 Received: from [192.107.41.17] (helo=shell1) by iglou1.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (8.12.5/8.12.5) (envelope-from ) id 1Gluia-0005Qf-Js; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:00:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:00:52 -0500 (EST) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <455FEC87.6030007@mac.com> Message-ID: References: <455FEC87.6030007@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system updates, as affected by securelevel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:01:01 -0000 On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Darrel wrote: >> With OpenBSD securelevel=2 I can install a kernel, make build, and >> install programs which are compiled using Systrace. >> >> What is the highest securelevel that I can configure on RELENG_6_2 >> which will not affect compiling and installing; e.g., perhaps not >> much local difference but having to reboot for a firewall change? >> This installation is new and the AUDIT option will be in the kernel. > > securelevel = 0. > > Because the kernel is installed using the schg flag: if you have securelevel > set to 1 or higher, you will not be able to over-write the kernel without > rebooting into single-user mode. See "man init" for details. > > [ Of course, reinstalling the kernel and/or world is something which you are > encouraged to do under single-user mode... ] > Thanks, Chuck. Excepting my amd64 the computers are servers at work, so I will use 'securelevel = 0' to facilitate system upgrades while "up"- only shutting down now for install world. 6.2 rc1 'install world' failed on my amd64. I can csup next month and try out 'securelevel = 3' on that. Probably build the world, etc., installkernel, mergemaster and installworld could all be run from single user then. Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 22:06:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BCF16A40F for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF3843D45 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:06:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C071A3C20; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:06:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7FD69514EA; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:06:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:06:06 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD" Message-ID: <20061119220606.GA3960@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <50369.10.202.77.88.1163973486.squirrel@webmail.superhero.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50369.10.202.77.88.1163973486.squirrel@webmail.superhero.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make.conf FreeBSD 6.2 RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:06:20 -0000 --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:58:06PM +0100, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wr= ote: > Hi, >=20 > I've recently installed 6.2-Beta3 and got KDE working with Xorg. As RC1 is > now released I want to upgrade to this version as I have been witnessing > some kernel errors and also want to 'play' with the system. >=20 > I've installed Xorg and KDE from the ports. >=20 > I am currently creating a make.conf file which should build the world but > nothing more than required. I have come up with the following but I am > unsure if certain lines shouldn't be commented out. > Such as NO_X. As I have build Xorg from the port, should I not build it > with the world? The only thing in the world that was affected by NO_X was doscmd (per the command), but this was removed from the tree some time ago. In fact, so was the NO_X entry from the example make.conf, so I guess you're basing off an old version. Kris --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFYNVNWry0BWjoQKURAl1eAJ9pE6WhBFEf6biiW8JLH2tNKIMcMwCfXgJa eeB/tEtjDHVI+zm+9fEWsqk= =LTMW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 22:16:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E90416A403 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gelsemap@superhero.nl) Received: from superman.superhero.nl (superhero.nl [213.84.142.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F8643D67 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:16:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gelsemap@superhero.nl) Received: (qmail 90260 invoked by uid 89); 19 Nov 2006 22:16:15 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 90253, pid: 90255, t: 4.7991s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.87.1/m:34/d:1180 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on superman.superhero.nl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.202.77.88?) (gelsemap@10.202.77.88) by superman.superhero.nl with SMTP; 19 Nov 2006 22:16:10 -0000 From: "Gelsema, P (Patrick)" To: Kris Kennaway Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:16:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <50369.10.202.77.88.1163973486.squirrel@webmail.superhero.nl> <20061119220606.GA3960@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20061119220606.GA3960@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611192316.07079.gelsemap@superhero.nl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make.conf FreeBSD 6.2 RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:16:26 -0000 On Sunday 19 November 2006 23:06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:58:06PM +0100, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've recently installed 6.2-Beta3 and got KDE working with Xorg. As RC1 > > is now released I want to upgrade to this version as I have been > > witnessing some kernel errors and also want to 'play' with the system. > > > > I've installed Xorg and KDE from the ports. > > > > I am currently creating a make.conf file which should build the world but > > nothing more than required. I have come up with the following but I am > > unsure if certain lines shouldn't be commented out. > > Such as NO_X. As I have build Xorg from the port, should I not build it > > with the world? > > The only thing in the world that was affected by NO_X was doscmd (per > the command), but this was removed from the tree some time ago. > > In fact, so was the NO_X entry from the example make.conf, so I guess > you're basing off an old version. True. I got FreeBSD 5.4 running on another box and used the make.conf as a starter. I have amended the make.conf file. My err. What I basically want is a make.conf with just enough to start FreeBSD, with SSH. Everything else to be installed from ports. Is this feasible? And if yes, which options are required? Crypto, CCX and OPENSSH? Any pointer in any direction much appreciated. Cheers Patrick > > Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 22:51:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B0F16A412 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:51:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F117E43D6B for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:51:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 8259 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Nov 2006 22:51:15 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mPo1yNRprFU8U1PRoZW4+fKADQEpeNIw4GAY6vYQPkLGjyjm/y3P36P6V9vBdFJlQV1MORPu+LT7G/pYIZwahPuaPLk5ln/PDhmOQcjVIa3VcEZgwuSfXaq5n0lF2eWie4upR56UR3cAVPsSKjzZ15kZQaUMLKQdPATc74DW6S8= ; Message-ID: <20061119225115.8257.qmail@web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.19.14.17] by web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:51:15 PST Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:51:15 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Qmail & Vpopmail From Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:51:17 -0000 7676Thanks everyone for your help. It's been a long weekend with lots of mi= stakes, but I'm up now.=0ARachel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A________________________= ____________________________________________________________=0ASponsored Li= nk=0A=0AMortgage rates near 39yr lows. =0A$420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate ne= w payment! =0Awww.LowerMyBills.com/lre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 19 22:57:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB2116A415 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:57:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57810.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57810.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3696643D7E for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:57:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 89990 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Nov 2006 22:57:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=6GhbgsgBbgAFDEekTEJ40TjkQ4qkatL1/xRYtivQMxS2M4K0r9zWXX+y3l0zZthFL/kzjrsR490S8fMsKp2sKrmydGbDlDSEfXeKOUgLKA0geaouFlWPVgjG3sTH7TKbl/UPrkDHgmE4KPqJ278C36tJvH6qZEbrr0dn7Gtr7Mo= ; Message-ID: <20061119225746.89988.qmail@web57810.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.19.14.17] by web57810.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:57:46 PST Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:57:46 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Best Hardware Choices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:57:56 -0000 8080Hi;=0AI need to buy new h/w that I'm going to use specifically to build= an experimental server...one that I can screw up with without crashing cli= ents' sites ;) What motherboard, chip, hard drive and firewall pci card do = you guys recommend for FBSD? I'm rebuilding a standalone box connected to a= satellite dish.=0ATIA,=0ARachel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A________________________= ____________________________________________________________=0ASponsored Li= nk=0A=0ADon't quit your job - take classes online=0Awww.Classesusa.com=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 00:06:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DD616A4B3 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-237-135.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.237.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB86843D82 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:05:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAK05hL3029457 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:05:43 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.7/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kAK05h4E029454 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:05:43 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id AAA12714; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:04:16 GMT Message-Id: <200611200004.AAA12714@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:05:34 EST." <20061119100534.a37a6e5c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:04:16 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:06:45 -0000 > > The machine has 2 GB. I wonder if the process is getting its fair share? > > I have been observing other problems where disk activity to one disk > > will make an unrelated process reading data from a different disk *very* > > unresponsive. > > Sounds like a hardware problem to me. If you've got a crappy SATA > controller that's going to block every now and again, you're going to > have trouble with this. Is the Nvidia "Nforce4 Ultra" chipset considered a crappy SATA controller? There are 4 Seagate SATA drives, 1 Seagate PATA drive (all 7200.8 .9 or .10), and 1 LG CD/DVD PATA drive. The PATA drives are idle during these tests. Doing dd between the disks and /dev/null it can do 40 MB/sec sustained at the slow end and 65-70 MB/s at the fast end of the drives, limited by the drives, and do this with all four SATA drives at once. It can do this reading or writing if the disks' cache is turned on. With the disks' cache turned off, the sustained write speed drops to about 1/10. But... if I do something like copy a large file from one disk to another, and then do something that needs to read from a third disk, the new process may hang for a very very long time. If I suspend (^Z) the copy process for a moment, the new process gets its data. I suspect that the kernel is letting the copy process kick everything else out of memory. To some extent that makes sence. It is caching the most recently accessed data. What I haven't figured out is why the new process is allowed to hang for so long. I had thought of putting in a circular buffer, but figured that it should be unnecessary since the normal Unix write-behind should buffer the writes from the disk I/O for me. I'll give it a try, maybe it will help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 00:58:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF3216A494 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B030F43D58 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:58:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:58:07 +0800 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:58:06 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:58:06 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: chpass -p dilema Importance: normal Priority: normal thread-index: AccMCcqwDmsGXCWQTES1S5i/3j/jgAANORfQ From: "Wood, Russell" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2006 00:58:07.0131 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0D476B0:01C70C3E] Subject: RE: chpass -p dilema X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:58:36 -0000 > Are you able to login to Single User Mode? On a vanilla installation it doesn't ask for the root password, so you should be able to mount the system and run chpass again. Regards, Russell Wood DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 01:05:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB3516A4AB for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5BA43D76 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:04:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:04:54 +0800 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:04:53 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:04:53 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Install Importance: normal Priority: normal thread-index: AccMAOtKR7mODnFmQi6i4TnWC0WrxgAPmSaQ From: "Wood, Russell" To: "Ramesh Subrahmaniam" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2006 01:04:53.0501 (UTC) FILETIME=[E30B9AD0:01C70C3F] Cc: Subject: RE: Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:05:02 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ramesh Subrahmaniam > Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 1:33 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Install >=20 >=20 > Hi >=20 > Where should I be asking questions regarding install ? If this is the > correct forum I have a Sis648-FX motherboard. > I have two hard drives; one Hitachi and one Western Digital. I also have a > BTC DVD-ROM. >=20 > In addtition to this I have two Sil 3112 SATA Controllers on which I have > four disks. Overall I have 6 disks. I would like to run Free BSD on it > make it a NAS box. >=20 > The 6.1 Production release bootonly.iso and the 6.2 RC1 bootonly.iso have > problems getting to install. When I try to install I cannot stop the > screen from scrolling very very fast. It just seems like some unhandled > interrupt in a continuous loop. This happens as soon as I see the Boot > from CD image. I cannot see anything meaningful. >=20 > Other than removing the Silicon image controllers what should I do. > Appreciate any ideas. >=20 > Thanks > Ramesh I would recommend disabling as much as possible in the BIOS just so you can get the installation done. Then one by one re-enabling everything to look for the issue. Regards, Russell Wood DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 01:18:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244B516A407 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4711843DA1 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:13:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:13:05 +0800 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:13:04 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:13:04 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Xircom XE2000 card problem Importance: normal Priority: normal thread-index: AccL9QV387OJHHtLS2uG/2mJgX0qkgAS6J9A From: "Wood, Russell" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2006 01:13:04.0729 (UTC) FILETIME=[07D70C90:01C70C41] Cc: Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:18:31 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of jvk-list@thekrafts.org > Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 12:08 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Xircom XE2000 card problem >=20 >=20 > Asked this question a couple of days ago in freebsd-mobile, but > haven't heard anything. I'm reposting here to, hopefully, a wider > audience... >=20 > I have an Inspiron 7000 laptop I've set up as a FreeBSD server running > Version 6.1. I have a Xircom XE2000 ethernet card I'd like to use. > It appears to be recognized by FreeBSD, but doesn't startup > correctly. In searching I've seen references to it working with > FreeBSD, but indicate it should use the xe driver. >=20 > Here's what the dmesg says: > ed1: at port 0x100-0x10f iomem > 0x88000000-0x88000fff irq 1 > 1 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 > device_attach: ed1 attach returned 6 >=20 > Looking at the hardware list it should be supported by the dc or xe > drivers, but not the ed driver. Am I missing something easy, or is > this card not reallyl supported at all? >=20 > Thanks, > Joe. If you have a closer look, it is using the ed (4): ed1: at port 0x100-0x10f iomem Make sure you have the following devices compiled in your kernel: device miibus device ed ... also, you might need: device pccard device cardbus Regards, Russell Wood DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 02:10:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971B816A40F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:10:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2CC43D62 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:10:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:10:50 +0800 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:10:50 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:10:49 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: port redirection with natd and ipfw Importance: normal Priority: normal thread-index: AccLbw+0nZgp/CP0RhK1Y1IhzPCdWgA2dVgw From: "Wood, Russell" To: "Nilton Volpato" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2006 02:10:50.0280 (UTC) FILETIME=[19782A80:01C70C49] Cc: Subject: RE: port redirection with natd and ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:10:58 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Nilton Volpato > Sent: Sunday, 19 November 2006 7:13 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: port redirection with natd and ipfw >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I'm using a computer with FreeBSD as a gateway and NAT for a private > LAN. Let's say the gateway has external.com as external address, and > 192.168.0.1 as internal address, so that the LAN is 192.168.0.0/24. >=20 > I'm doing a number of port redirects in the gateway, for svn, http, > https, ssh, etc using natd. However, these port redirects do not work > from inside the LAN. >=20 > For instance, if I point my browser to http://external.com and I'm in > the LAN, then it will not work. I can't use the internal address of > the web server because none of the links will work on the web page. >=20 > In summary, I want that my port redirections work also when I try to > connect to the gateway's external address from inside the LAN. >=20 > I'm using a minimal ipfw configuration to try to solve this. This is > the default configuration. >=20 > 00050 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via vr0 > 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 65000 allow ip from any to any > 65535 deny ip from any to any >=20 > I tried to add: >=20 > 00060 divert 8668 ip4 from 192.168.0.0/24 to external.com >=20 > expecting that it would send the packets from LAN to natd, which would > apply the port redirections. But it did not work. >=20 > How can I solve this? >=20 > Thanks, > -- Nilton I had a similar setup once and used Split DNS with BIND. So, if you requested example.com on 192.168.0.0/24 then you'd get the internal IP, otherwise you got the external IP. Regards, Russell Wood DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 06:11:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBA016A40F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [63.105.30.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD8F43D55 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:11:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAK6BeTX082115 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:11:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kAK6BeG1082114 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:11:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:11:40 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061120061139.GA81330@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Subscription problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:11:42 -0000 It appears that the IP that mx2.freebsd.org now uses was in SpamCop's DNSBL between approx 21:00 PST 11/18 to approx. 17:10 PST 11/19. My system rejected mail from mx2.freebsd.org based on the DNSBL entry during that time. Despite those bounces, emails from freebsd's mailman service and postmaster@ show that I am still subscribed. I have now whitelisted mx2.freebsd.org in my /etc/mail/access database. While I am still receiving traffic on freebsd-mobile, I have not seen any digests from freebsd-questions or freebsd-stable for about 36 hours now. Is this problem local to me or remote? Thanks! Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 06:29:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0B316A403 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy08.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFB843D45 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:29:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy08 [148.235.52.28]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.05 (built Mar 3 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J9000F13NDCI5@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:29:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from morena.maps.mx(dsl-189-165-11-230.prod-infinitum.com.mx [189.165.11.230]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.05 (built Mar 3 2005))with ESMTP id <0J9000C49NDCZS@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:29:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:29:36 -0700 From: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez In-reply-to: To: Zbigniew Szalbot , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200611192329.36312.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 X-imss-version: 2.044 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:71.35071 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:5 C:4 M:4 S:4 R:4 (1.5000 1.5000) References: <"200611140009. 5 4183.mapsware"@prodigy.net.mx> Cc: Subject: Re: changing swap size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:29:49 -0000 El Mar 14 Nov 2006 00:17, escribi=F3: > Dear Martin, > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote: > > El Lun 13 Nov 2006 06:34, Zbigniew Szalbot escribi=F3: > >> If I increase RAM to, say, 1GB, would I need to change the swap size to > >> 2GB? > > > > I think not. =BFAre your computer still swaping? > > Yes, it is. I am planning to add more RAM. I mean, after you add memory, Are your computer still swaping? If you can add enough memory, so you computer don't swap, you are gone to g= et=20 best performance. If I were you, I add RAM to 1GB and leave the swap as it is. If the use of swap is above 75%, then I would add swap. maps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 06:35:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23A416A412 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd3mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67E643D7B for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:35:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd2mr7so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr7so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.10]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J9000DASNMYYL30@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:35:22 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml2so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.146]) by pd2mr7so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J900026INMY0HP0@pd2mr7so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:35:22 -0700 (MST) Received: from s01060013d45e14da.vs.shawcable.net ([70.71.24.198]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J9000CVCNMXRHJ0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:35:22 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:35:20 -0800 From: Andriy Babiy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200611192235.20418.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Organization: home MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 Subject: AudioCD file tags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:35:28 -0000 Hi all, My question is simple: what program should I use to set the tags? Actually, I need to change tags of audio tracks before burning them with k3b. I am not sure if those tags are the same that can be changed in mp3 files. I tried to change tags through: 1) KDE Konqueror (right click on a filename -> Properties -> Meta Info); 2) tagmp3; 3) k3b (right click on an audio track -> Properties... -> Title/Performer, no Year/Genre tags there); I can see all the tags in KHex editor, I can see differencies in tags when I change any of them using any of the aforementioned methods. But when I play them with KsCD, I see that some of disks were burnt with correct information (Performer / Album / Title), but many of them didn't have this information at all, so they are shown as Unknown Performer and Track 1 (2, 3, etc.). It looks that my changes had no effect at all. Is it a problem of setting tags? Or is it a problem of KsCD recognizing tags? Or is it a conflict of tag writing software versions? Or is it a problem with character encoding? Or is it simply a problem of my configuration? Many thanks in advance for your advise. Andriy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 08:07:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E836916A40F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [216.148.227.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F4A43D5C for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:07:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from [67.188.231.169] (c-67-188-231-169.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.231.169]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20061120080737m13004n3oae>; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:07:37 +0000 Message-ID: <45616258.5040604@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:07:52 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Mounting XP drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:07:38 -0000 I've been having trouble mounting a Windows XP drive. Acutally, the drive mounts, but the system always starts up in single user mode. Here is the fstab: # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ad0s1d /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/ad1s1 /c ntfs rw 1 1 /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 When I try to boot the system I get this error message: fsck: exec fsck_ntfs for /dev/ad1s1 in /sbin:/usr/sbin: no such file or directory The system then goes directly into single user mode. When I ctrl-D my way into multi-user mode and do a df I find that the Windows drive is mounted. I just can't seem to avoid the initial boot into single-user mode. Any help would be appreciated. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 08:14:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9BA16A40F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B5443D64 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:14:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kAK8ElEY026024; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:14:47 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:13:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <455D6BCA.9070505@skoberne.net> In-Reply-To: <455D6BCA.9070505@skoberne.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611201013.29012.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Gregor Likar , Nejc Skoberne Subject: Re: Restarting DSL connection without reboot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:14:51 -0000 On Friday 17 November 2006 09:59, Nejc Skoberne wrote: > I really don't like to reboot servers as soon as they lose DSL connectivity. > Is there any "proper" way to reset the connection (network card?) so that the > connection restores without a reboot? Yes, the proper way is enabling echo and/or lqr. This way ppp will know when the other peer is down and will try to reconnect. This way you will not have to restart anything, Check /usr/share/examples/ppp for examples and "man ppp". Set your timeouts at will. Ĺxcerpt from ppp manual: echo Default: Disabled. When this option is enabled, ppp will send LCP ECHO requests to the peer at the frequency defined by ``echoperiod''. Note, LQR requests will supersede LCP ECHO requests if enabled and negotiated. See ``set lqrperiod'' below for details. Prior to ppp version 3.4.2, ``echo'' was considered enabled if lqr was enabled and negotiated, otherwise it was considered dis- abled. For the same behaviour, it is now necessary to ``enable lqr echo'' rather than just ``enable lqr''. lqr Default: Disabled and Accepted. This option decides if Link Quality Requests will be sent or accepted. LQR is a protocol that allows ppp to determine that the link is down without rely- ing on the modems carrier detect. When LQR is enabled, ppp sends the QUALPROTO option (see ``set lqrperiod'' below) as part of the LCP request. If the peer agrees, both sides will exchange LQR packets at the agreed frequency, allowing detailed link quality monitoring by enabling LQM logging. If the peer does not agree, and if the ``echo'' option is enabled, ppp will send LCP ECHO requests instead. These packets pass no information of interest, but they MUST be replied to by the peer. Whether using LQR or LCP ECHO, ppp will abruptly drop the connec- tion if 5 unacknowledged packets have been sent rather than send- ing a 6th. A message is logged at the PHASE level, and any appropriate ``reconnect'' values are honoured as if the peer were responsible for dropping the connection. Refer to the ``enable echo'' command description for differences in behaviour prior to ppp version 3.4.2. HTH Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 08:32:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674EF16A403 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3327B43D5D for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:32:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B99C365925; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:32:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405793658B1; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:32:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C41B398CF; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:25:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45616810.2010602@esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:32:16 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060828) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: unable to compile firefox 2.0 from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:32:23 -0000 Hello I tried to compile firefox 2.0 from ports and I got this error message help welcome ( my ports directory is "refreshed" every night) thanks you ++ -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-rtti - fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virt ual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -O2 -fno -strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -fshort-wchar -pipe -DNDEBU G -DTRIMMED -O2 -fPIC -shared -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-h,libgtkxtbin.so -o libgtkxtbin.s o gtk2xtbin.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib/firefox -L/usr/X1 1R6/lib -lgtk-x11-2.0 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXt -lX11 -Wl,-Bsymbolic -lc -lm -p thread -L/usr/local/lib -liconv gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x13): In function `xt_event_prepare': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_lock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x2f): In function `xt_event_prepare': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x5c): In function `xt_event_prepare': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x8b): In function `xt_event_check': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_lock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0xa0): In function `xt_event_check': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0xca): In function `xt_event_check': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x110): In function `xt_event_dispatch': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_lock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x14f): In function `xt_event_dispatch': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x254): In function `gtk_xtbin_class_init': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x274): In function `gtk_xtbin_class_init': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x2e2): In function `gtk_xtbin_set_position': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x30a): In function `gtk_xtbin_set_position': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x315): In function `gtk_xtbin_set_position': : undefined reference to `gdk_window_move' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x348): In function `gtk_xtbin_resize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x409): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_drawable_get_visual' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x411): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_x11_visual_get_xvisual' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x41d): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_drawable_get_colormap' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x425): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_x11_colormap_get_xcolormap' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x431): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_drawable_get_visual' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x4d1): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x4e8): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_window_get_user_data' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x507): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x521): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_new' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x537): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_set_priority' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x541): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_set_can_recurse' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x54b): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_attach' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x588): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_main_context_add_poll' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x5ec): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_get_display' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x629): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x63f): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x66d): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_free' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x69a): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x6ae): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x6c0): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x6d5): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x6f6): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x75e): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x7ae): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_is_a' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x7cc): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x814): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x838): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_is_a' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x859): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_return_if_fail_warning' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x87e): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_main_context_remove_poll' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x88a): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_source_remove' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x995): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_is_a' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x9b3): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x9d7): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `gdk_window_get_geometry' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0xa1a): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0xa42): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0xc47): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `gdk_flush' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0xc64): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0xc8c): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_is_a' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0xcad): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_return_if_fail_warning' gtk2xtbin.o(.data.rel+0xc): undefined reference to `g_free' gmake[2]: *** [libgtkxtbin.so] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/widget/src/gtkx tbin' gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. lisa# -- Cordialement Frank Bonnet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 09:27:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A5516A40F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:27:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0080743D7D for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:27:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id kAK9RTx53784; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:27:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <002701c70c85$db821eb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: References: <454E9F7B.5010105@outstep.com> <454EB6D6.3030807@infowest.com> <454EBEEC.1060002@u.washington.edu> <454F210C.9000602@outstep.com> <004001c70706$0d571ec0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <62104DC1-8AD2-41E1-B469-51CAC91A8D8B@mac.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:25:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: Garrett Cooper , Lonnie Cumberland , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:27:56 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Cc: "Lonnie Cumberland" ; "Garrett Cooper" ; Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:02 AM Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD? > Ted, you got a couple of things wrong. Read below for the corrections. > > > > The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that > > runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very > > difficult to compile on MacOSX. > > This is completely wrong. Take a look at macports [1] (formerly > darwinports) for a large repository of UNIX software that compiles > very cleanly on OSX. It's nearly 7 years since OSX shipped to the > public. In that time, most opensource software was updated to compile > cleanly on OSX. The primary changes to allow this were to the > "configure" scripts so they recognize darwin as a base OS. If other > patches were necessary, most software maintainers accepted these > patches back into their trunk. > I spent a lot of time trying to build KDE on Panther and end up at a dead end. There's many problems there. A lot I understand were fixed in Tiger and there's somewhat of alpha binaries out there - but they must use magic to build them. In any case, Tiger won't run on anything that doesen't have firewire so you can just toss out your older iMacs right there. Command line programs do compile, but you have to make many changes in some of them. Macports is fine if the program you want is in there. If not and your rolling it yourself, then you better know what your doing. > OSX has excellent support for most UNIX software. > Uh, huh. Yeah, right. There's not a lot of UNIX software out there that supports all the major flavors of UNIX very well, which is why the FreeBSD ports system is so important for FreeBSD. And unfortunately more and more UNIX software is being written and built on Linux and not tested on FreeBSD. Take mysql for example, it's heavily dependent on threads and while the FreeBSD threads implementation is superior to the Linux implementation, mysql didn't work at all with it until recently, and it doesen't work as well as under Linux. Patching the holy hell out of a package to get it to build does NOT mean there's "excellent support" for the package under that UNIX. The package may run fine, in fact, may run better than under Linux or whatever it was developed on, but that does not equal support. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 09:30:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D0916A40F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E9143D49 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:30:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id kAK9UZx53802; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:30:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <003801c70c86$49fbd3e0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Garrett Cooper" , References: <454E9F7B.5010105@outstep.com> <454EB6D6.3030807@infowest.com> <454EBEEC.1060002@u.washington.edu> <454F210C.9000602@outstep.com> <004001c70706$0d571ec0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <62104DC1-8AD2-41E1-B469-51CAC91A8D8B@mac.com> <455915BA.9090300@infowest.com><45592A1C.3020705@u.washington.edu> <4559307D.1070301@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:28:50 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: Subject: Re: [OT] A+ for Mac (was Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:30:53 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Garrett Cooper" > > You do realize that there is an OSX binary at the 2/3 of the way down > the download page, do you not? This entirely defeats the purpose of Open Source. If all you can do is run binaries of open source applications that other people have compiled for you, you are no better off than the people that run Windows and binary Windows programs only. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 10:43:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2983E16A403 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petre@kgb.ro) Received: from kgb.rdsbv.ro (kgb.rdsbv.ro [82.78.148.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CE943D72 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:43:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petre@kgb.ro) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kgb.rdsbv.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4601411ED0 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:46:55 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kgb.rdsbv.ro Received: from kgb.rdsbv.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kgb.rdsbv.ro [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dC+giZz8fZ1G for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:46:52 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kgb.rdsbv.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E1611716 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:46:52 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:46:51 +0200 From: Petre Bandac To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061120124651.50c26eb5@localhost> Organization: my own organization X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_p14jYJ7qs+Xle3Nw3PJsY/p"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: raid advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:43:39 -0000 --Sig_p14jYJ7qs+Xle3Nw3PJsY/p Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hallo I have had a previous experience with gmirror raid 1 following dru lavigne's howto (http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html) however, it did not behave as I expected (and as other raid arrays I have on linux - if a disk is removed, the system keeps working and on reboot the array is ran in degraded mode) I have manually pulled out a disk from the array and upon booting I was put to a console to specify the root filesystem and so on I have the following question: what is your choice of software raid on freebsd if behaviour on disk failures (this implies the time for hot-adding disks to array, reconstructing, recovering data, debugging, etc is at the minimum) is the most important criterion ? thanks, petre --=20 Petre Bandac Network Scientist - petre@kgb.ro --Sig_p14jYJ7qs+Xle3Nw3PJsY/p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFYYebygb/8u7LqpgRAhhMAKCr7MxznSETQ+1qW4ze6OjkQbS+7QCfWp+g ROGbADVaX6SGxvFU7BKX6+U= =YVi2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_p14jYJ7qs+Xle3Nw3PJsY/p-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 10:45:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F9B16A403 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:45:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA3043D7F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:44:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1931870nfc for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:44:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=bzj9uGzm+yQsh8RRMvlSTs3EaOROiE6AzMIwtyPK7zam62GdvETzFlWeful9FNkeqh+R84SGUWvjLRlX9LmD7PLFlIwBovwNCg0Ad+Gmy5PR/uQ1dm6JLonkjSqrosawi+dBwdekwMBryfEgH/Mv3Uaq+XeH2M6SYUKR70Zmapw= Received: by 10.78.201.10 with SMTP id y10mr5058501huf.1164019489156; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.115.5 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:44:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27dbfc8c0611200244l636e3469h6371cfef0188d6d4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:44:49 +0100 From: "Valerio Daelli" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Problem with modem DSL Dlink X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:45:11 -0000 Hi list I am trying to configure FreeBSD 6.0 with an ADSL modem (ethernet) PPPoE. The modem is DSL-302T Dlink ADSL 2+ compliant. The ethrenet interface is a realtek (I can use it without problem). We are able to connect from Linux and Windows with this modem. With FreeBSD we configured everything as it's told in the Handbook, I also followed http://renaud.waldura.com/doc/freebsd/pppoe/ but when I try to talk with the modem I just get 'no carrier'. Could yuo please helpe me? Thanks a lot Valerio Daelli From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 11:20:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9338D16A49E for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jvk-list@thekrafts.org) Received: from smtpout13-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout13-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [68.178.232.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46A5C43F8A for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jvk-list@thekrafts.org) Received: (qmail 29971 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2006 11:14:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gem-wbe16.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.189.224) by smtpout13-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with SMTP; 20 Nov 2006 11:14:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 12791 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2006 11:14:24 -0000 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:14:24 -0700 From: jvk-list@thekrafts.org To: "Wood,Russell" Message-ID: <20061120041423.10b6271f30786ad7adcc9756bb6c2f30.c396b212f5.wbe@email.secureserver.net> User-Agent: Web-Based Email 4.8.16 X-Originating-IP: 153.26.176.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:20:09 -0000 > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem >From: "Wood, Russell" >Date: Sun, November 19, 2006 6:13 pm >To: , > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- >> questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of jvk-list@thekrafts.org >> Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 12:08 AM >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Xircom XE2000 card problem >> >> >> Asked this question a couple of days ago in freebsd-mobile, but >> haven't heard anything. I'm reposting here to, hopefully, a wider >> audience... >> >> I have an Inspiron 7000 laptop I've set up as a FreeBSD server running >> Version 6.1. I have a Xircom XE2000 ethernet card I'd like to use. >> It appears to be recognized by FreeBSD, but doesn't startup . >> correctly. In searching I've seen references to it working with >> FreeBSD, but indicate it should use the xe driver. >> >> Here's what the dmesg says: >> ed1: at port 0x100-0x10f iomem >> 0x88000000-0x88000fff irq 1 >> 1 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 >> device_attach: ed1 attach returned 6 >> >> Looking at the hardware list it should be supported by the dc or xe >> drivers, but not the ed driver. Am I missing something easy, or is >> this card not reallyl supported at all? >> >> Thanks, >> Joe. > >If you have a closer look, it is using the ed (4): > >ed1: at port 0x100-0x10f iomem > >Make sure you have the following devices compiled in your kernel: > >device miibus >device ed > >... also, you might need: > >device pccard >device cardbus > >Regards, >Russell Wood I did see that it was using the ed(4) driver. I'm using the GENERIC kernel which contains pccard, cardbus, miibus, and ed drivers. I was wondering if that was the correct driver or if it was being detected incorrectly. I don't see anything in the ed(4) man page about supporting any Xircom products. Most of the Xircom cards seem to be supported by the xe driver, and this bug report http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2005-August/014 396.html seems to support that theory. Also, searching through the ed(4) code doesn't generate eny references to any Xircom products. It just seems to me that it should be using the xe(4) driver not the ed(4) driver. Is there a way to try and force it to the xe driver to see if it will work? Thanks for your time, Joe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 11:34:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C8B16A47B for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:34:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wittig.robert@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD52743D68 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:34:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wittig.robert@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 94986 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2006 11:34:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=MVQLAooHq1Gj2Fe3fpuHdpdn3lFH+83Am2x9EPqmli7aFlx7MaOY+SaMjnbm+MpfavQCtD/7Lds+qt59OWaepRxxaraVQ3B+cIlSapZtUYZxXao3eeTrNOiRhNYncvZE0IheE7jynyKkdUARiV4zrmuSYaYTdH13EyQHaApSxyw= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (wittig.robert@sbcglobal.net@70.142.248.62 with plain) by smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2006 11:34:26 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: n34j1C4VM1kQog_YoQ0jGX_puzQbeESgIOUaF5kjBP6KOVXPpD2HMNdDBtJJ.qm1odohufZxgadw83eBE9xM3R3NkdRtSVK06rpw_r5EDDDVADtrqODPdA-- Message-ID: <456192C1.2040601@sbcglobal.net> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 05:34:25 -0600 From: Robert C Wittig User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Long References: <20061120061139.GA81330@ns.umpquanet.com> In-Reply-To: <20061120061139.GA81330@ns.umpquanet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subscription problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:34:57 -0000 James Long wrote: > It appears that the IP that mx2.freebsd.org now uses was in SpamCop's > DNSBL between approx 21:00 PST 11/18 to approx. 17:10 PST 11/19. > My system rejected mail from mx2.freebsd.org based on the DNSBL > entry during that time. > > Despite those bounces, emails from freebsd's mailman service and > postmaster@ show that I am still subscribed. I have now whitelisted > mx2.freebsd.org in my /etc/mail/access database. > > While I am still receiving traffic on freebsd-mobile, I have > not seen any digests from freebsd-questions or freebsd-stable > for about 36 hours now. > > Is this problem local to me or remote? > Well I am now guessing that my ATT DSL service must be using SpamCop for their bulk mail folder... I noticed that I received zero emails from this list in this morning's email, and when I went to the ATT bulk mail folder, there was the email from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. -- -wittig http://www.robertwittig.com/ . http://robertwittig.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 11:47:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D4616A416 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: from web52103.mail.yahoo.com (web52103.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FD9443D49 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:46:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 81679 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2006 11:47:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Zz+OFKTluNV8qmYPPOiovhmrnNkbBlkki2MBYoi/NsmGbtnMO473QNHXdmYFakitykBPLTyRCSm48t5EoupSMhbCksNTbYNxEDPCG1V6BfbcTz7N/9B1XounhxaUY4ij0hw411uvhZ3UkLP0M1xODQ4MJEF7gLsRusbI7ltfCWY=; X-YMail-OSG: WXBdG34VM1kw9NzHpWZisWPPaY9ixZnspNZOnvy9G2IsKGiWOTCLCPWM8.9oeub3eEM8IJwZDogbn1r5vTBZdCS27RNtQghQdStDkn3fW4ASqEYEBxYuz50tPBASv8l.imbMWcYP5yJnew-- Received: from [62.56.216.83] by web52103.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:47:06 PST Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:47:06 -0800 (PST) From: gahn To: freebsd general questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <902576.81196.qm@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: installation of freeradius X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:47:12 -0000 hi all: i am having trouble to get freeradius installed: ===> Installing for openldap-client-2.3.29 ===> openldap-client-2.3.29 conflicts with installed package(s): openldap-client-2.2.30 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/openldap23-client. *** Error code 1 i can't remove the "openldap-client-2.2.30" since other packages depend on it, but without the "openldap-client-2.3.29", i can't get freeradius going. any idea to solve this delimma? regards _ming ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Degrees online in as fast as 1 Yr MBA, Bachelor's, Master's, Assoc http://yahoo.degrees.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 11:53:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A491C16A416 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:53:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110D343D58 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:53:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id kAKBqlmk015473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:52:59 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAKBqWEJ001140; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:52:35 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kAINTipA004336; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:29:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:29:44 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Rachel Florentine Message-ID: <20061118232943.GB4190@kobe.laptop> References: <20061117135918.62452.qmail@web57809.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061117135918.62452.qmail@web57809.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.983, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.34, BAYES_00 -2.60, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48 0.88, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The Mystery Of the Disappearing Processes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:53:50 -0000 On 2006-11-17 05:59, Rachel Florentine wrote: > Hi; > My server crashed yesterday. We finally got it back up. The > problem was a startup script that I'd created. However, now > that it's back up, when I ps some of the processes which are > running (notably Zope) don't show up. Qmail doesn't show up > either *unless* I shut it down and restart it (but that doesn't > make the Zope processes show up). What's going on here? You haven't, by any chance, installed a new kernel (one with mismatched version from the userland you are using), and accidentally rebooted (because of the crash) into this one, right? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 11:58:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199D716A407 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:58:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc5-cmbg1-0-0-cust497.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [86.6.1.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1737F43D5E for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:57:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.63 #0) id 1Gm7mc-000DpP-Fs by authid for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:57:54 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:57:54 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20061120115754.GB13154@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD References: <45616258.5040604@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45616258.5040604@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Mounting XP drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:58:01 -0000 --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 12:07:52AM -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote: > I've been having trouble mounting a Windows XP drive. Acutally, the=20 > drive mounts, but the system always starts up in single user mode. Here= =20 > is the fstab: >=20 > # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump = =20 > Pass# > /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 > /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 > /dev/ad0s1d /usr ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/ad1s1 /c ntfs rw 1 1 > /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 >=20 > When I try to boot the system I get this error message: >=20 > fsck: exec fsck_ntfs for /dev/ad1s1 in /sbin:/usr/sbin: no such file or= =20 > directory >=20 > The system then goes directly into single user mode. When I ctrl-D my=20 > way into multi-user mode and do a df I find that the Windows drive is=20 > mounted. I just can't seem to avoid the initial boot into single-user=20 > mode. >=20 > Any help would be appreciated. Change the final column for /dev/ad1s1 to 0. When set to 1, it causes init to run fsck against a mount point before mounting it. As you have found, there is no fsck_ntfs, because at the moment ntfs support in FreeBSD is read-only. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFYZhBixf5fBYiFmoRAgfPAKDQq2Fq+XZh3LBBXdGibr61klj0FQCglXYQ eHOrcFh4gcArbW+x66ZewrQ= =l7VR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 12:03:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BFB16A49E for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc5-cmbg1-0-0-cust497.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [86.6.1.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F69C43D9A for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:02:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.63 #0) id 1Gm7rY-000Dus-9s by authid for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:03:00 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:03:00 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd general questions Message-ID: <20061120120259.GC13154@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd general questions References: <902576.81196.qm@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <902576.81196.qm@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: installation of freeradius X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:03:26 -0000 --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 03:47:06AM -0800, gahn wrote: > hi all: >=20 >=20 > i am having trouble to get freeradius installed: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> Installing for openldap-client-2.3.29 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> openldap-client-2.3.29 conflicts with installed > package(s):=20 > openldap-client-2.2.30 >=20 > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/net/openldap23-client. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > i can't remove the "openldap-client-2.2.30" since > other packages depend on it, but without the > "openldap-client-2.3.29", i can't get freeradius > going. >=20 > any idea to solve this delimma? Try setting WANT_OPENLDAP_VER=3D22 in /etc/make.conf. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFYZlzixf5fBYiFmoRAgAkAJ9ibjPk3qt3JNduOb0qSUnMsXJJQACgyfTS t1IXMhyAUJnvQ6CRupr/mC8= =YPPD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 12:14:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C33216A416 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE36E43D6B for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:14:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d32so1015579pye for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:14:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=uuYut5SrqYzhQwMUkrI5On5QpWJFlCS4k/cHEjQPr9mw/zncznFr4/6rpQ9OWXjy/p4V6iZApTTPzZfFlDt7V09Fk5UpwXOe75y2GZg+nkoeBYizdBRN78Wk1utuPPPpHvgZuZ5Bkjt/y3vy9eIgzXEHikmhQJI+1mrUtqgJPe8= Received: by 10.35.98.6 with SMTP id a6mr517576pym.1164024866314; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:14:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.20? ( [75.7.74.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22sm6355680nzn.2006.11.20.04.14.25; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:14:25 -0800 (PST) From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:13:27 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <902576.81196.qm@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <902576.81196.qm@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611200613.27873.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: gahn Subject: Re: installation of freeradius X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:14:41 -0000 On Monday 20 November 2006 05:47, gahn wrote: > hi all: > > > i am having trouble to get freeradius installed: > > ===> Installing for openldap-client-2.3.29 > > ===> openldap-client-2.3.29 conflicts with installed > package(s): > openldap-client-2.2.30 > > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/openldap23-client. > *** Error code 1 > > i can't remove the "openldap-client-2.2.30" since > other packages depend on it, but without the > "openldap-client-2.3.29", i can't get freeradius > going. > > any idea to solve this delimma? > > regards > > _ming > > You can follow the instructions that you have up above. # pkg_delete -f openldap-client-2.2.30 # cd /usr/ports/net/openldap23-client # make install - or - # pkg_add -vr openldap23-client # pkgdb -Ff change the dependancies to the new openldap23-client. Then try installing freeradius. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 12:29:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602F616A47B for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BA843F04 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:24:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so981423pyh for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:24:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=uuYut5SrqYzhQwMUkrI5On5QpWJFlCS4k/cHEjQPr9mw/zncznFr4/6rpQ9OWXjy/p4V6iZApTTPzZfFlDt7V09Fk5UpwXOe75y2GZg+nkoeBYizdBRN78Wk1utuPPPpHvgZuZ5Bkjt/y3vy9eIgzXEHikmhQJI+1mrUtqgJPe8= Received: by 10.35.98.6 with SMTP id a6mr517576pym.1164024866314; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:14:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.20? ( [75.7.74.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22sm6355680nzn.2006.11.20.04.14.25; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:14:25 -0800 (PST) From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:13:27 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <902576.81196.qm@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <902576.81196.qm@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611200613.27873.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: gahn Subject: Re: installation of freeradius X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:18 -0000 On Monday 20 November 2006 05:47, gahn wrote: > hi all: > > > i am having trouble to get freeradius installed: > > ===> Installing for openldap-client-2.3.29 > > ===> openldap-client-2.3.29 conflicts with installed > package(s): > openldap-client-2.2.30 > > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/openldap23-client. > *** Error code 1 > > i can't remove the "openldap-client-2.2.30" since > other packages depend on it, but without the > "openldap-client-2.3.29", i can't get freeradius > going. > > any idea to solve this delimma? > > regards > > _ming > > You can follow the instructions that you have up above. # pkg_delete -f openldap-client-2.2.30 # cd /usr/ports/net/openldap23-client # make install - or - # pkg_add -vr openldap23-client # pkgdb -Ff change the dependancies to the new openldap23-client. Then try installing freeradius. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 08:52:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE73A16A407 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.Provenziani@sirti.it) Received: from dmzmps01.sirti.it (host8-146-static.243-194-b.business.telecomitalia.it [194.243.146.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9134643D6B for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:52:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from M.Provenziani@sirti.it) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: M.Provenziani@sirti.it To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-MIMETrack: MIME-CD by Notes Server on Cassina/Sirti(Release 6.5.5FP1|April 11, 2006) at 20/11/2006 09.52.13, MIME-CD complete at 20/11/2006 09.52.13, Serialize by Router on Smtp1/Sirti(Release 6.5.5FP1|April 11, 2006) at 20/11/2006 09.48.46 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:52:13 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Lotus Domino Web Server Release 6.5.5FP1 April 11, 2006 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:41:26 +0000 Subject: named is not running??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:52:18 -0000 Hi Fafa Hafiz Krantz I got an identical error message. Could you please let me know if you understand what'is the problem related to that massage and how you fix it. Thanks MIchele Provenziani From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 11:50:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2158B16A415 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56D6843D68 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:50:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 91897 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2006 11:50:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ImQ/Oy/K2tldjMxY1d6pqY1OUDHoin45UobYPQv91f2z9xoX3DvP6fn2fr8cbLkAU2INdh8vbQp41K01lPjzYE0zMusCNTcJjg0UkWVdowivGH1j9trrMlVDZATGoNjxTlj9wCMIJlOeBGAweKCYXKKwjx7VWaZmYBfkIUuIsYE= ; Message-ID: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.82.9.48] by web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:50:35 PST Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:50:35 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:41:41 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:50:49 -0000 Hi;=0AI'm reading a how-to and it tells me to issue this command:=0A=0Achow= n -R alias.qmail ~alias/rejoice=0A=0ABut that errors. What's the BSD transl= ation?=0ATIA,=0ARachel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A__________________________________= __________________________________________________=0ASponsored Link=0A=0ADo= n't quit your job - take classes online=0Awww.Classesusa.com=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 12:47:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F84F16A403 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD3643D7F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so984219pyh for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:44:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=uuYut5SrqYzhQwMUkrI5On5QpWJFlCS4k/cHEjQPr9mw/zncznFr4/6rpQ9OWXjy/p4V6iZApTTPzZfFlDt7V09Fk5UpwXOe75y2GZg+nkoeBYizdBRN78Wk1utuPPPpHvgZuZ5Bkjt/y3vy9eIgzXEHikmhQJI+1mrUtqgJPe8= Received: by 10.35.98.6 with SMTP id a6mr517576pym.1164024866314; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:14:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.20? ( [75.7.74.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22sm6355680nzn.2006.11.20.04.14.25; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:14:25 -0800 (PST) From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:13:27 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <902576.81196.qm@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <902576.81196.qm@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611200613.27873.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: gahn Subject: Re: installation of freeradius X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:47:01 -0000 On Monday 20 November 2006 05:47, gahn wrote: > hi all: > > > i am having trouble to get freeradius installed: > > ===> Installing for openldap-client-2.3.29 > > ===> openldap-client-2.3.29 conflicts with installed > package(s): > openldap-client-2.2.30 > > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/openldap23-client. > *** Error code 1 > > i can't remove the "openldap-client-2.2.30" since > other packages depend on it, but without the > "openldap-client-2.3.29", i can't get freeradius > going. > > any idea to solve this delimma? > > regards > > _ming > > You can follow the instructions that you have up above. # pkg_delete -f openldap-client-2.2.30 # cd /usr/ports/net/openldap23-client # make install - or - # pkg_add -vr openldap23-client # pkgdb -Ff change the dependancies to the new openldap23-client. Then try installing freeradius. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 12:48:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A7716A403 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08ADC43E15 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:45:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=server3) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1Gm8X8-000489-Cm for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:45:58 +0000 Message-ID: <003101c70ca1$dfbe3100$1c07a8c0@server3> From: "Graham Bentley" To: References: <20061120120045.E3F3F16A538@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:46:17 -0000 Organization: Custom PC North West MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Subject: Editors / PDF Viewers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Graham Bentley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:48:09 -0000 Hi All, Just wondering ..... what would you say is the equivalent to Wordperfect for DOS within FOSS / FreeBSD Ports? Also, what are people using to view PDF's under X ? I have tried Xpdf but it looks a bit clunky whilst Adobe 7.0 has ballooned out of proportion !!! And, lastly .... If I make install a port and decided I want to remove it (make deinstall?) is it also possible to remove all the other ports it sucked in ? In relation to this question how do I 'reset' the options sometimes shown for certain make's? Many Thanks !!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 12:50:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FD816A508 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457EB43EF7 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:48:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1544640wxc for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:48:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=spl1SxqDivdfMT2fgILEXPkhRClAbXZaNrcWWlI6JOtxdosEk5TOZBpfLDD/qdi5ACBSaOdGL8q+rapIihtdcR+mHIaSd5WNn8nsXlRpqGjqiB3vTJ4ayrt1L80vpGBb4rq8LAloOWIE/WpK4ArFfjf121jtGR2bh80JDx1obFw= Received: by 10.70.129.5 with SMTP id b5mr9667815wxd.1164026880694; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:48:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.130.20 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:48:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:48:00 +0800 From: Jahilliya To: "Rachel Florentine" In-Reply-To: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:50:23 -0000 On 11/20/06, Rachel Florentine wrote: > > Hi; > I'm reading a how-to and it tells me to issue this command: > > chown -R alias.qmail ~alias/rejoice > > But that errors. What's the BSD translation? > TIA, > Rachel > I'm guessing it's error is something about invalid user/group... Try using a colon instead of a ., so alias.qmail becomes alias:qmail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 12:50:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DBD16A531 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:50:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicklas@dinpris.no) Received: from dp-mail-01.dinpris.com (dp-mail-01.dinpris.com [62.73.247.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B677543DD2 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nicklas@dinpris.no) Received: (qmail 28818 invoked by uid 1004); 20 Nov 2006 12:52:48 -0000 Received: from 62.73.247.155 (nicklas@dinpris.no@62.73.247.155) by dp-mail-01.dinpris.com (envelope-from , uid 98) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/1674. spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:RC:1(62.73.247.155):. Processed in 0.027951 secs); 20 Nov 2006 12:52:48 -0000 Received: from v4078.skn-sw2.dinpris.com (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (nicklas@dinpris.no@62.73.247.155) by dp-mail-01.dinpris.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2006 12:52:48 -0000 Message-ID: <4561A461.8020304@dinpris.no> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:49:37 +0100 From: "Nicklas B. Westerlund" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rachel Florentine References: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:50:33 -0000 Rachel Florentine skrev: > Hi; > I'm reading a how-to and it tells me to issue this command: > > chown -R alias.qmail ~alias/rejoice > > But that errors. What's the BSD translation? > man 8 chown it's on the 1st line in the synopsis. Nick. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 12:50:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F181516A40F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEDD43D5D for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:50:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kAKCoOEY009101; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:50:24 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:49:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611201449.05834.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Rachel Florentine Subject: Re: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:50:39 -0000 On Monday 20 November 2006 13:50, Rachel Florentine wrote: > Hi; > I'm reading a how-to and it tells me to issue this command: > > chown -R alias.qmail ~alias/rejoice > > But that errors. What's the BSD translation? I suspect you mean this(from chown manual) COMPATIBILITY Previous versions of the chown utility used the dot (``.'') character to distinguish the group name. This has been changed to be a colon (``:'') character so that user and group names may contain the dot character. Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 12:55:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6A916A500 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E279143D62 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:55:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so987249uge for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:55:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kWLM5pukKqzxLlZE4SlvHgT6dFIgyxrDDVlGl2KMYiAd74vCmZIkgsRzlwh3avVvb84wOV7pnNX4aSZoXzVEhXWGA1tFCCCq/ur+QyyI2hcIvBDSY9tGIkx+um/VFDScnJ3PLmzv1p8xEPf05h2iu57mvEvZ9B7z0cKGGVAxxVI= Received: by 10.67.22.14 with SMTP id z14mr7254550ugi.1164027328766; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:55:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.237.14 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:55:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <755cb9fc0611200455h72eeeff4k37eb565169778466@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:55:28 +0000 From: "Alexandre Vieira" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <755cb9fc0611170832r51baffbes808450079243db3d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <755cb9fc0611170832r51baffbes808450079243db3d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Netra T1 105 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:55:52 -0000 On 11/17/06, Alexandre Vieira wrote: > > Hi lists, > > I got my hands in some Netras T1 105 and I'll be installing freebsd over > the network since I don't have CD-ROM drives. > > I was googling around to find a recent kernel/loader to use in the net > installation but I couldn't find anything. Anyone knows where can I find > these? > > PS: In a last resort I think I can compile a sparc64 kernel in another > non-sparc64 machine. But what about the loader? > > TIA. > Regards, > -- > Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com > Hi, Is it possible to retrieve these from an sparc64 ISO? TIA Regards, -- Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 13:00:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA38D16A47B for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (aup166.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.23.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2929443D90 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAKCwkO0081315 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:58:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <4561A67E.4050009@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:58:38 +0100 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rachel Florentine References: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig91AC1C6A4DC94C9FA0BE026E" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2205/Mon Nov 20 10:07:02 2006 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:00:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig91AC1C6A4DC94C9FA0BE026E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 20/11/2006 12:50, Rachel Florentine wrote: > Hi; > I'm reading a how-to and it tells me to issue this command: >=20 > chown -R alias.qmail ~alias/rejoice >=20 > But that errors. What's the BSD translation? I'm not sure, what it's supposed to do? You can check chown's syntax and options with 'man 8 chown': % chown [-fhv] [-R [-H | -L | -P]] owner[:group] file ... % chown [-fhv] [-R [-H | -L | -P]] :group file ... % -R Change the user ID and/or the group ID of the specified directory % trees (recursively, including their contents) and files. [...] HTH, Karol --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enig91AC1C6A4DC94C9FA0BE026E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFYaaGezeoPAwGIYsRCOsuAJ4o32fIUeZxYnhI1zjM+z3c5ea5YQCfXSCs 8/DjBJDV3h9KVDPY7N9JLFQ= =FZgW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig91AC1C6A4DC94C9FA0BE026E-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 13:15:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D9B16A416 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from annara@opera.com) Received: from sam.opera.com (sam.opera.com [193.69.113.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A87543D79 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from annara@opera.com) Received: from id-c0410.oslo.opera.com (pat.opera.com [193.69.113.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by sam.opera.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id kAKDEwvH030335 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:14:58 GMT Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:14:50 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Anna Rajsman" Organization: Opera Software ASA Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (Win32) Subject: Re: Opera and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:15:11 -0000 Hi again, I would like to apologize for the confusion I caused on Friday. Please read my explanation in my blog: http://my.opera.com/annaraj/blog/2006/11/20/the-freebsd-accident Once again I am very sorry! Best regards, Anna On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:16:13 +0100, Anna Rajsman wrote: > Hi FreeBSD Team, > > My name is Anna Rajsman and I am working in Opera Software. Recently I > took over Linux distribution at Opera and I have been going through the > distribution agreements we have with Linux providers and I haven't found > any with FreeBSD Linux. > > We would like to ask you if you would like to distribute the > Opera browser with your OS? Or maybe you are doing it already? > Would you like to sign a distribution agreement with Opera? > > Best regards, > Anna > > -- > Anna Rajsman > Tel: +47 2416 4354, mailto:annara@opera.com > Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 13:26:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F3316A407 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from annara@opera.com) Received: from sam.opera.com (sam.opera.com [193.69.113.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1B543DCC for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:23:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from annara@opera.com) Received: from id-c0410.oslo.opera.com (pat.opera.com [193.69.113.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by sam.opera.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id kAKDNUvn030492 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:23:30 GMT To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Anna Rajsman" Organization: Opera Software ASA Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061117214332.0F7285B21@mail.bitblocks.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:23:21 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20061117214332.0F7285B21@mail.bitblocks.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (Win32) Subject: Re: Opera and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:26:12 -0000 Hi again, I would like to apologize for the confusion I caused on Friday. Please read my explanation in my blog: http://my.opera.com/annaraj/blog/2006/11/20/the-freebsd-accident Once again I am very sorry! Best regards, Anna On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:43:31 +0100, Bakul Shah wrote: > "Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu" writes: >> "Anna Rajsman" wrote: >> > We would like to ask you if you would like to distribute the >> > Opera browser with your OS? Or maybe you are doing it already? >> > Would you like to sign a distribution agreement with Opera? >> >> Opera is in our ports framework, both the native version and the linux >> version (both maintainers CC'ed). I don't know offhand if we distribute >> the binaries on our CD images; from reading the licence I don't see the >> any requirement to have a signed agreement for this, but if this is not >> the case please let me know. >> >> I am using Opera as my primary browser since v3 or something, but I am >> a little disappointed the the problems we're seeing on FreeBSD are >> rarely addressed. And indeed the binaries you're producing are for >> FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x while we will release 6.2 in a month. > > Speaking as a very happy Opera user, anything we can do to > improve our (FreeBSD's) relationship with Opera is a huge win > for us both. If it takes a signed agreement to make that > relationship "official", I am all for it. Also, I hope that > will result in improved support for the FreeBSD version of > Opera and in turn we can provide testing, feedback, etc. to > Opera. > > For me firefox-2.0 is still nowhere near as good as Opera and > I'd like to see Opera get even better! Also, on FreeBSD the > FreeBSD version uses less resources than the linux version. > > More generally I think we ought to get into such agreements > with more companies. Particularly companies like Adobe as > Flash is getting more and more pervasive (I understand that > moving big comapnies can be very hard which is why we should > first embrace as many smaller companies as we can and loudly > proclaim such agreements on www.freebsd.org). -- Anna Rajsman, Marketing and Sales Assistant Tel: +47 2416 4354, mailto:Anna.Rajsman@opera.com Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 13:47:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B88016A416 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B6943D81 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:46:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:46:50 -0500 id 0005648A.4561B1CA.0000F730 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Nov 2006 08:46:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:46:49 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Graham Bentley Message-Id: <20061120084649.2d27f1b5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <003101c70ca1$dfbe3100$1c07a8c0@server3> References: <20061120120045.E3F3F16A538@hub.freebsd.org> <003101c70ca1$dfbe3100$1c07a8c0@server3> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Editors / PDF Viewers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:47:47 -0000 In response to "Graham Bentley" : > > Just wondering ..... what would you say is the equivalent > to Wordperfect for DOS within FOSS / FreeBSD Ports? Probably some tex tool ... > Also, what are people using to view PDF's under X ? > > I have tried Xpdf but it looks a bit clunky whilst Adobe > 7.0 has ballooned out of proportion !!! I agree with those two assessments. Adobe also doesn't seem to understand CUPS printing. I've been using gpdf happily for a while. > If I make install a port and decided I want to remove it > (make deinstall?) is it also possible to remove all the > other ports it sucked in ? In relation to this question > how do I 'reset' the options sometimes shown for > certain make's? Have a look at the pkg_cutleaves port ... pretty nice IMHO. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 13:55:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207E616A415 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:55:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toreld@netscape.net) Received: from mail47.e.nsc.no (mail47.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C7243E3D for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:53:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from toreld@netscape.net) Received: from [84.202.199.72] (084202199072.customer.alfanett.no [84.202.199.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail47.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id kAKDr0g5025306 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:53:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4561B29D.7050702@netscape.net> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:50:21 +0100 From: Tore Lund User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060925) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061117214332.0F7285B21@mail.bitblocks.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Opera and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:55:59 -0000 Anna Rajsman wrote: > Hi again, > > I would like to apologize for the confusion I caused on Friday. > > Please read my explanation in my blog: > http://my.opera.com/annaraj/blog/2006/11/20/the-freebsd-accident It certainly looks like beastie is doing his best to put the point across to you. :-) Appreciated. -- Tore From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 14:07:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1789616A4D2 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B6B43F26 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:03:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i20so286783wra for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:03:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=RyxIqKWpP2XyPCp0hIh+BP1H6oVsxNaz7kYrz6pS38IvH/qwLzsXqDBKghxMiSahtwEl1sXuMkrRjHYspiLKgWGuRRctu8zUM3jiEJcCwTp7lXoYI3N+8LCYoELfd3Qq+wOYx8lCYW/r69T/Ubx0sBYuPGwpiv0WwDPwGa04hAE= Received: by 10.90.25.7 with SMTP id 7mr3236471agy.1164031418016; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:03:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.20? ( [75.7.74.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e1sm6472598nzd.2006.11.20.06.03.37; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:03:37 -0800 (PST) From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:02:39 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061120115035.91895.qmail@web57815.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611200802.39953.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: Rachel Florentine Subject: Re: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:07:37 -0000 On Monday 20 November 2006 05:50, Rachel Florentine wrote: > Hi; > I'm reading a how-to and it tells me to issue this command: > > chown -R alias.qmail ~alias/rejoice > > But that errors. What's the BSD translation? > TIA, > Rachel > > > It means, depending on what the error is, that you don't have alias.qmail in /etc/passwd, or you don't have ~alias/rejoice. That command won't work until you correct what's missing. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 14:29:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F2416A4C8 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ne.bahn@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A01743D46 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ne.bahn@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1571823wxc for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:29:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=OKq5KMknoggIAm0D6cQbGA7L3M0YfeLVrI0DD+m8LFDjsIRMl4Of1VSQL4EcZKudF5v1ZFIDI/lzz/Y2kTdtlWHwre18LqD1bkHNNJjQAZ2r5YtPpmcumtOcYsNCxqBGfE1yq4ZgP+K3naRuK2PYCYGhnHXUK2+YGlMHVPRwfSM= Received: by 10.70.52.5 with SMTP id z5mr9813377wxz.1164032962010; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:29:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from bloodlust ( [69.60.116.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i20sm11960403wxd.2006.11.20.06.29.16; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:29:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000a01c70cb0$396694f0$1033a8c0@bloodlust> From: "Ne'Bahn" To: "UNIX - Questions" Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:25:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Display settings question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:29:54 -0000 Hi list, I've searched for my display (Hewlett Packard 7500) settings, specifically for Horizontal / Vertical refresh that are the values used in the X.Org configuration; no exact matching founded because all docs refers to Synchronization (Vertical and Horizontal) expressed in Herz too, so I must assume these values are Horizontal / Vertical refresh or are the refresh rates that comes together with every one resolution supported, e.g.: Display Resolutions Refresh Rates 640 x 480 60 Hz 640 x 480 75 Hz 640 x 480 85 Hz 720 x 400 70 Hz 800 x 600 75 Hz 800 x 600 85 Hz 1024 x 768 75 Hz 1024 x 768 85 Hz (preferred user resolution) 1280 x 1024 60 Hz (maximum resolution) Synchronization (Horizontal) 30 to 70 KHz Synchronization (Vertical) 50 to 140 Hz If it possible to specify wich range of values to use in this case with this info. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 14:49:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B0016A417 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:49:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D63E43D45 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:48:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 60204 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2006 14:48:59 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=g5+gH3e9bdSszSCRahCJyqbEs0Rio30VaOFpG723UsVVE1xgUqRSQNVzCeDUVwPwkqS+VMqMWtwmAYSLGHQY9N7xqY4UQzQkeVTgZpdPySvusybrKW1aAypIPGTohzXotQ8sSrWJbhqF+GF8bq/MkBRCcT89jRNjwFhyV5ZLEuI= ; Message-ID: <20061120144859.60202.qmail@web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.82.9.53] by web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:48:59 PST Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:48:59 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: "Nicklas B. Westerlund" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:49:02 -0000 ----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Nicklas B. Westerlund =0A=0A> man 8 chown=0A=0AIt's all about syntax, isn't it?=0Achown -R ali= as:qmail ~alias/rejoice=0AThanks,=0ARachel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A________= ___________________________________________________________________________= _=0ASponsored Link=0A=0AMortgage rates near 39yr lows. =0A$510k for $1,698/= mo. Calculate new payment! =0Awww.LowerMyBills.com/lre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 14:51:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE82716A47C for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57813.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57813.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15E0043D66 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:50:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 1724 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2006 14:51:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MduE/7O9MgylqU4jeKrRBWXBP9mSqTSUnp4dxGvGaR5RtkVhuxshAzCcRt4QzP+eXu3gFOsauwK8nBjptxj4pjhAGrbFkuUb2a+fRLEwu98ehVvwthAESBJT3Cbko4vqTy2OFnRu7DPOsYp0vPO+CKTi+qGCFXAPSyJ3BrGPz6w= ; Message-ID: <20061120145110.1722.qmail@web57813.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.82.9.53] by web57813.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:51:10 PST Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:51:10 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: Giorgos Keramidas MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The Mystery Of the Disappearing Processes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:51:11 -0000 ----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Giorgos Keramidas =0A=0A> You haven't, by any chance, installed a new kernel (one with= =0A> mismatched version from the userland you are using), and=0A> accidenta= lly rebooted (because of the crash) into this one,=0A> right?=0A=0ANo...lot= 's sillier than that. I thought "ps" would bring up all the same processes = as "ps wax". Surprise!=0AThanks,=0ARachel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A_________= ___________________________________________________________________________= =0ASponsored Link=0A=0AMortgage rates near 39yr lows. =0A$310k for $999/mo.= Calculate new payment! =0Awww.LowerMyBills.com/lre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 14:43:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0796A16A403 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:43:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57811.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57811.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BC0B43D5D for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:43:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 26872 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2006 14:43:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fxjI0Qgl/KDmP6VoqDHpxdCQw+841XxXTQslllhU0xqfaGwCARXhTzqLiVBSyfX+8UzCCMGhrSkCGrz/6STmqbJim7ToxwMl2WycCF2bDpu29HCrbzPU32VUEywaB0/h1sTHNrtnWnGdJKWLVXK3gwZanqLRSNecAoIFLcW+ncA= ; Message-ID: <20061120144328.26870.qmail@web57811.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.82.9.53] by web57811.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:43:28 PST Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:43:28 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: "Donald J. O'Neill" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:10:48 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:43:30 -0000 ----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Donald J. O'Neill =0A=0A> It means, depending on what the error is, that you don't have ali= as.qmail =0A> in /etc/passwd, or you don't have ~alias/rejoice. That comman= d won't work =0A> until you correct what's missing.=0A=0A=0A=0Aalias:*:81:8= 1::0:0:User &:/var/qmail/alias:/nonexistent=0Aqmailr:*:86:82::0:0:User &:/v= ar/qmail:/nonexistent=0Aqmailp:*:84:81::0:0:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent= =0Aqmails:*:87:82::0:0:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent=0Aqmailq:*:85:82::0:0= :User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent=0Aqmaill:*:83:81::0:0:User &:/var/qmail:/no= nexistent=0Aqmaild:*:82:81::0:0:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent=0Arejoice:*:= 1010:1010::0:0:rejoice-list:/home/rejoice:/usr/sbin/nologin=0A=0Achown: ali= as.qmail: Invalid argument=0A=0AWhat shall I try next?=0ATIA,=0ARachel=0A= =0A=0A=0A=0A =0A___________________________________________________________= _________________________=0ADo you Yahoo!?=0AEveryone is raving about the a= ll-new Yahoo! Mail beta.=0Ahttp://new.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 15:12:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F2B16A403 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (aup166.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.23.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4620D43D9D for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:12:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAKFCHhl088282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:12:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <4561C5C9.8050508@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:12:09 +0100 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anna Rajsman References: <20061117214332.0F7285B21@mail.bitblocks.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDAD10F2D13097F5AE78F58EA" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2205/Mon Nov 20 10:07:02 2006 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opera and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:12:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDAD10F2D13097F5AE78F58EA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Anna, reply below. On 20/11/2006 14:23, Anna Rajsman wrote: > Hi again, >=20 > I would like to apologize for the confusion I caused on Friday. >=20 > Please read my explanation in my blog: > http://my.opera.com/annaraj/blog/2006/11/20/the-freebsd-accident >=20 > Once again I am very sorry! Many people confuse FreeBSD (or other BSDs) with Linux, even those working in IT, don't worry. Your reply shows good intentions and that's what counts. I hope you've got an email address to contact to? Pozdrawiam :) Karol --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enigDAD10F2D13097F5AE78F58EA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFYcXQezeoPAwGIYsRCMIsAJ0am01CWPGhG826ZQKebWuWdDgtFACguBAE CgRNnhVX0MWwPftdVVCohIs= =MmLr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDAD10F2D13097F5AE78F58EA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 15:27:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2747A16A50A for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:27:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57803.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57803.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DC9943D67 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:26:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 69752 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2006 15:27:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RRzUUCAY86ki6drMZyXm4P7wMn1DUTAkVzEblgQ8Hha4niidXnJ8eNls14crPJPrhnuuGbWgQ4Q2FjMCfqFvmlQXUCme9gbr2b3O3F9EDJw3jriQhLXs5F3aqEbXhdLVEqDPLBf/5uJ1Aiy+vPVI8pJF8fQTs28J1KLNApFwpS0= ; Message-ID: <20061120152707.69750.qmail@web57803.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.82.9.53] by web57803.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:27:07 PST Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:27:07 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: "Donald J. O'Neill" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:27:09 -0000 ----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Donald J. O'Neill =0A=0A> I see by the list, you found your answer, use ":" due to syntax. = I am curious =0A> as to what the howto is that you're trying to follow.=0A= =0Ahttp://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=3Dezmlm+%22create+a+list&fr=3Dyfp-= t-501&toggle=3D1&ei=3DUTF-8&u=3Dbinarios.com/lnb/ezmlm.html&w=3Dezmlm+%22cr= eate+a+list%22&d=3DOSt3npIFNr73&icp=3D1&.intl=3Dus=0ARachel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A= =0A=0A =0A_________________________________________________________________= ___________________=0ASponsored Link=0A=0A$420k for $1,399/mo. =0AThink You= Pay Too Much For Your Mortgage? =0AFind Out! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 15:36:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C589116A49E for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6559B43D8B for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:35:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 28082 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2006 15:35:57 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Nov 2006 15:35:57 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2FD0828430; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:35:56 -0500 (EST) To: Nathan Vidican References: <455E1159.9000605@wmptl.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:35:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <455E1159.9000605@wmptl.com> (Nathan Vidican's message of "Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:45:29 -0500") Message-ID: <444psut9k4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP pavillion dv8000 hotkey mappings X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:36:06 -0000 Nathan Vidican writes: > Does anyone know how to make use of the hotkeys for multimedia > functions? (ie: play/pause, stop, prev, next, vol-up, vol-down, mute, > etc) ... Have found several articles on these machines, but most > pertaining to the way one particular linux distro vs another makes use > of these keys. > > Most specifically, I'd like to get them to work from within kde, mixer > function more than anything (need quick mute/vol-up/down - could live > without the rest). I'm just not sure where/how to map the keys using > freebsd/xorg? > > Hoping it'll be something simple, but what? - or is this something > more complex regarding acpi ? > > Any ideas, suggestions, comments, or redirects greatly appreciated. If they produce x events (check with xev), then they can be mapped like any other event. I recently had such a keyboard, however, and those keys didn't produce any events. I didn't have a chance to play with it much, though; I had to get rid of it for unrelated reasons. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 15:45:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7356516A4FC for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E60743E39 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 30355 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2006 15:41:28 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Nov 2006 15:41:28 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2691828430; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:41:27 -0500 (EST) To: Eric Schuele References: <455F17F5.2000403@computer.org> <44k61s3bbo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <455F59FA.3020201@computer.org> <44psbkmg3e.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <455FB45E.8020403@computer.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:41:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <455FB45E.8020403@computer.org> (Eric Schuele's message of "Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:33:18 -0600") Message-ID: <44u00uruqh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup problems.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:45:03 -0000 Eric Schuele writes: > On 11/18/06 18:32, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Eric Schuele writes: >> >>> On 11/18/06 11:37, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>>> Eric Schuele writes: >>>> >>>>> I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new >>>>> bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server what usually >>>>> takes five minutes, takes 30-minutes to an hour (or they just >>>>> hang). Which is terribly annoying. >>>>> >>>>> I've tried picking other servers by hand, and I've tried the >>>>> fastest_cvsup script. Doesn't seem to matter which I pick. They all >>>>> seem to be slow except cvsup5... and cvsup5 does not give me anything >>>>> anymore. No source, no ports, no docs. >>>> cvsup5.us.freebsd.org does seem to have stopped updating. I've >>>> cc'd the "hubs" mailing list in case this was not known. >>>> >>>>> I have not changed anything on my end. Is there something going on >>>>> that I am not aware of that is affecting the servers, or my ability to >>>>> interact with them? Is it related to the release, the move, anything? >>>> I tried cvsup3.us.freebsd.org (the example you showed in your >>>> supfile), and it seemed fine; not just fast, but fully in synch >>>> with my usual cvsup host (although it was busy enough that I had >>>> to try for a while before I got in). So whatever is going on does >>>> seem to be local to you. >>>> >>> I don't know what it could be. >> >> >> Try increasing the verbosity of cvsup; it may be able to tell you >> what its problem is. >> > > Man page says > > cvsup -g -L 2 ${SUPFILE_DIR}/supfile > > Is as verbose as it gets. Which is what I used in my last post. Is > there something more I can tweak? My oversight; my apologies. At this point, I would start looking at the packet traffic directly, but that's my specialty... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 15:47:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F0B16A519 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:47:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FDE43DD9 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:43:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 15327 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2006 15:44:08 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Nov 2006 15:44:08 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8084F28431; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:44:07 -0500 (EST) To: nathan_p_maier@comcast.net References: <111920060223.3020.455FC0250002F77800000BCC22007637049D0A070E03A19FA1020E089B0E02@comcast.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:44:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <111920060223.3020.455FC0250002F77800000BCC22007637049D0A070E03A19FA1020E089B0E02@comcast.net> (nathan p. maier's message of "Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:23:33 +0000") Message-ID: <44psbirum0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using NetGear wireless usb adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:47:39 -0000 nathan_p_maier@comcast.net writes: > I have a NetGear WG111 usb wireless network adapter. Is there any way to use this? I get the ugen0: with the name of the adapter. How much further can I get? What's the next step? Try checking the "wireless networking" chapter in the FreeBSD Handbook. It will probably work best with recent FreeBSD releases. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 15:52:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E27416A412 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ovidiue@unixware.ro) Received: from elgreco.hmdnsgroup.com (elgreco.hmdnsgroup.com [63.247.135.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9797743DB6 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:47:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ovidiue@unixware.ro) Received: from unixware.iasi.rdsnet.ro ([86.124.41.195]:63962 helo=unixware.ro) by elgreco.hmdnsgroup.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1GmBNQ-0005xR-9F; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:48:08 -0500 Message-ID: <4561CDD0.1000400@unixware.ro> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:46:24 +0200 From: ovidiu ene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions References: <455ED90E.10400@unixware.ro> <8289B626D72650D4AD7B35B3@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: <8289B626D72650D4AD7B35B3@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-From: ovidiue@unixware.ro X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - elgreco.hmdnsgroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - unixware.ro X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: Subject: PowerEdge 1950 SAS and SATA support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:52:47 -0000 Hello again Thank you for your detalied answer. Do you know if FreeBSD 6.1 support SATA controller or SAS controller on PowerEdge 1950 best regards, ovidiu ene Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On November 18, 2006 11:57:34 AM +0200 ovidiu ene > wrote: > >> Hello guys, >> >> I want to know if Dell PowerEdge 1950 works fine on FreeBSD 6.1 i386. >> (I am interested if network cards are detected and work properly, also >> if SATA/SAS drive is detected properly. >> > There are two problems that you must overcome and they require that > you rebuild world and kernel. The network card driver has a problem, > and the usb driver has a problem. The former causes the network card > to become unusable and only a reboot will fix it. The latter prevents > you from using the DRAC card (if you ordered one with the 1950.) > > Both problems can be overcome with newer source code files, but you > then have to rebuild world and kernel. And you must save those source > code files, because you'll need them every time you have to update > world or kernel due to security patches. > > The two files in question are if_bce.c and ehci.c. > > if_bce.c > > > > ehci.c v 1.42: > > > > > Put this version in place in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb, comment out line 766 > and rebuild your kernel and the DRAC5 keyboard will start to work. > > The commit note says MFC after 2 weeks, but this seems to have been > missed. > I'm going to ping the maintainers and see if I can get it MFCed before > 6.2 > comes out. > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Senior Information Security Analyst > The University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 15:57:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A133516A509 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:57:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57814.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57814.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90C0244017 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:52:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 84962 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2006 15:52:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=M/LR9LLsJBlA/Mnfy5jL8r5HYLduS1OHXmzSAwerQnnDU79KF9rIgZ3EfssjWBAqk3qJeqwfVw7cKejP8W2Lfm6hwlo6q+zemjip8ndC/oJnIc6nmOedgW16i/ETMn6ahK1bDsbB9P6UR5ghFRJfqAT1DP1lmVYgYRy7Pgd/vKE= ; Message-ID: <20061120155248.84960.qmail@web57814.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.19.14.33] by web57814.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:52:48 PST Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:52:48 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: DAve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:57:46 -0000 ----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: DAve =0A=0A>= If you cannot build source, use the netqmail package, it is maintained =0A= > by some of the best qmail folks and they will help you to get it working.= =0A=0AWhat's so hard about building from source? But I used the netqmail pa= ckage and the ezmlm port (since I was told by the author of O'Reilly's *Qma= il* that the port for qmail was "junk").=0AThanks,=0ARachel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A= =0A=0A =0A_________________________________________________________________= ___________________=0ASponsored Link=0A=0A$420k for $1,399/mo. =0AThink You= Pay Too Much For Your Mortgage? =0AFind Out! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 15:58:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF4416A417 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.192.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F0943ED4 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:57:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from [67.188.231.169] (c-67-188-231-169.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.231.169]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20061120155707m13004pm39e>; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:57:07 +0000 Message-ID: <4561D052.9000207@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:57:06 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: <45616258.5040604@comcast.net> <20061120115754.GB13154@catflap.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <20061120115754.GB13154@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Mounting XP drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:58:26 -0000 Daniel Bye wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 12:07:52AM -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote: > >> I've been having trouble mounting a Windows XP drive. Acutally, the >> drive mounts, but the system always starts up in single user mode. Here >> is the fstab: >> >> # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump >> Pass# >> /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 >> /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 >> /dev/ad0s1d /usr ufs rw 2 2 >> /dev/ad1s1 /c ntfs rw 1 1 >> /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 >> >> When I try to boot the system I get this error message: >> >> fsck: exec fsck_ntfs for /dev/ad1s1 in /sbin:/usr/sbin: no such file or >> directory >> >> The system then goes directly into single user mode. When I ctrl-D my >> way into multi-user mode and do a df I find that the Windows drive is >> mounted. I just can't seem to avoid the initial boot into single-user >> mode. >> >> Any help would be appreciated. >> > > Change the final column for /dev/ad1s1 to 0. When set to 1, it causes > init to run fsck against a mount point before mounting it. As you have > found, there is no fsck_ntfs, because at the moment ntfs support in > FreeBSD is read-only. > > Dan > > Bingo! Thanks Dan. I remember reading somewhere about the sketchy support for ntfs, and I needed to read the man page on fstab. That sixth column is there for a reason! Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:07:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E9C16A47C for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F7A43D72 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:07:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kAKG7eOM008328 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:07:40 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kAKG7dBP022553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:07:39 -0800 Message-ID: <4561D2BA.4020908@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:07:22 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <454E9F7B.5010105@outstep.com> <454EB6D6.3030807@infowest.com> <454EBEEC.1060002@u.washington.edu> <454F210C.9000602@outstep.com> <004001c70706$0d571ec0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <62104DC1-8AD2-41E1-B469-51CAC91A8D8B@mac.com> <455915BA.9090300@infowest.com><45592A1C.3020705@u.washington.edu> <4559307D.1070301@u.washington.edu> <003801c70c86$49fbd3e0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> In-Reply-To: <003801c70c86$49fbd3e0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.11.20.75432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: [OT] A+ for Mac (was Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:07:58 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Garrett Cooper" >> You do realize that there is an OSX binary at the 2/3 of the way down >> the download page, do you not? > > This entirely defeats the purpose of Open Source. If all you can do is run > binaries of open source applications that other people have compiled for > you, > you are no better off than the people that run Windows and binary Windows > programs only. > > Ted A+ compiles perfectly fine for me, but it's probably because I have fink installed on my system. Could you reply to me personally (the original poster) with a point in the configuration or make process where it fails for you? -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:13:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5569B16A47B for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E921E43DAB for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:12:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kAKGCgLs006627; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:12:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <4561D3F9.5080908@wmptl.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:12:41 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <455E1159.9000605@wmptl.com> <444psut9k4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <444psut9k4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP pavillion dv8000 hotkey mappings X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:13:55 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Nathan Vidican writes: > > >> Does anyone know how to make use of the hotkeys for multimedia >> functions? (ie: play/pause, stop, prev, next, vol-up, vol-down, mute, >> etc) ... Have found several articles on these machines, but most >> pertaining to the way one particular linux distro vs another makes use >> of these keys. >> >> Most specifically, I'd like to get them to work from within kde, mixer >> function more than anything (need quick mute/vol-up/down - could live >> without the rest). I'm just not sure where/how to map the keys using >> freebsd/xorg? >> >> Hoping it'll be something simple, but what? - or is this something >> more complex regarding acpi ? >> >> Any ideas, suggestions, comments, or redirects greatly appreciated. >> > > If they produce x events (check with xev), then they can be mapped > like any other event. I recently had such a keyboard, however, and > those keys didn't produce any events. I didn't have a chance to play > with it much, though; I had to get rid of it for unrelated reasons. > > > running xev, reports keypress events when the buttons are pressed (also when the buttons are pressed using the wireless media remote), ie (the following is output on the console when pressing the 'Volume Up' button on the actual laptop: KeyPress event, serial 31, synthetic NO, window 0x2600001, root 0x44, subw 0x2600002, time 5348585, (46,24), root:(1056,685), state 0x0, keycode 176 (keysym 0x0, NoSymbol), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 0 bytes: XmbLookupString gives 0 bytes: XFilterEvent returns: False and again, when using the wireless IR remote, I get: KeyRelease event, serial 31, synthetic NO, window 0x2600001, root 0x44, subw 0x2600002, time 5346693, (46,24), root:(1056,685), state 0x0, keycode 176 (keysym 0x0, NoSymbol), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 0 bytes: So, now the question turns to how do I map these keys to functions like the mixer? Specifically, how to do so within KDE ? - kmix, (kde's interface to mixer), has the option to set global hotkeys, but only accepts known keyboard presses into a text box. Posing the question of questions; is it that I need to find out how to map unknown keys within a program, or that I need to figure out how to map unknown keys into known keys? Is it possible to define these keys, when the laptop was original (booting Windows XP home), I was able to find the keypress events using WinAMP's global hotkey config (similar to kde's kmix's dialog) with keynames like 'VolUP','NextTrack', etc). I am assuming this was a function of the keyboard driver or some other mapping created by HP when they installed windows - the key now then, is how do I accomplish the same under xorg/kde ? -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:15:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF9216A412 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@proficuous.com) Received: from mail.proficuous.com (www.proficuous.com [209.240.79.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D852A43DCD for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:15:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@proficuous.com) Received: from [192.168.3.68] (unknown [192.168.3.68]) by mail.proficuous.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8A4A8AC63 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:15:30 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4561D4A6.10702@proficuous.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:15:34 -0600 From: Aaron Martinez User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ping send to problem, what am i missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:15:57 -0000 I'm trying to get some routing working from my freebsd 6.1 machine that i thought should be extremely easy, but not having any luck. When trying to ping the destination address (192.168.5.6) i get : "ping: sendto: Invalid argument" the net goes like so: freebsd6.1----linux router-----another linux router---openbsd machine (running openvpn) the corresponding routing tables are as such: freebsd6.1: Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.3.94 UGS 1 121441 fxp0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 192.168.3.64/27 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 192.168.3.94 00:40:f4:76:3d:d3 UHLW 2 106622 fxp0 1154 192.168.4.1/32 192.168.4.5 UGS 0 2042 tun0 192.168.4.5 192.168.4.6 UH 1 0 tun0 192.168.5 192.168.0.66 UGS 0 154 fxp0 I manually added the 192.168.5 route using the following command (please correct me if i did it incorrectly route -n add 192.168.5/24 192.168.0.66 first linux router: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.3.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 eth0 192.168.3.96 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 eth2 192.168.3.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 eth1 192.168.3.160 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 eth4 192.168.3.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 eth3 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.62 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 eth0 second linux router: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.3.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 eth3 192.168.3.96 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 eth3 192.168.3.64 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 eth3 192.168.3.160 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 eth3 192.168.3.128 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 eth3 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 eth2 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 eth1 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 40 0 0 dsl1 openbsd machine: Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu Interface default 192.168.0.254 UGS 5 516934 - rl0 127/8 127.0.0.1 UGRS 0 0 33224 lo0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 125 33224 lo0 192.168.0/24 link#1 UC 2 0 - rl0 192.168.0.2 00:d0:b7:8f:51:41 UHLc 0 5 - rl0 192.168.0.254 00:e0:18:90:17:f1 UHLc 1 0 - rl0 192.168.4/24 192.168.4.2 UGS 0 2042 - tun0 192.168.4.2 192.168.4.1 UH 1 0 - tun0 192.168.5/24 192.168.5.2 UGS 0 3411 - tun1 192.168.5.2 192.168.5.1 UH 1 5 - tun1 224/4 127.0.0.1 URS 0 0 33224 lo0 i can successfully ping the 192.168.0.66 host with no problems, so i'm guessing that most of my routes are fine, i am a little suspect however about the route i manually put in. I can also ping the 192.168.5.6 address FROM the openbsd machine. All firewalls between these machines ARE disabled. i DO have ip forwarding enabled on the OPENBSD machine: # sysctl -a | grep forward net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 I can't figure what's going on here any help would be terribly appreciated. Any more info that is needed just ask. thanks in advance, Aaron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:19:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF03016A492 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BEB43D67 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:19:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9A45E06; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:19:46 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4pHnXhlp16Xf; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:19:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-95-165.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.95.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9FC5D32; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:19:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4561D59C.4060005@mac.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:19:40 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ramesh Subrahmaniam References: <20061119173324.53829.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061119173324.53829.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:19:49 -0000 Ramesh Subrahmaniam wrote: > Where should I be asking questions regarding install ? This list is a good place. > If this is the correct forum I have a Sis648-FX motherboard. > I have two hard drives; one Hitachi and one Western Digital. I also have a BTC DVD-ROM. > > In addtition to this I have two Sil 3112 SATA Controllers on which I have four disks. > Overall I have 6 disks. I would like to run Free BSD on it make it a NAS box. The Silicon Image 3112 chipset is broken, and while some workarounds in software are available, performance and reliability of the SilI 3112 suffer. I'd return the MB and get another one with a known-working SATA controller. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:20:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E6616A4FE for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848C943D92 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:19:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:19:53 -0500 id 0005648A.4561D5A9.00010BFB Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Nov 2006 11:19:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:19:52 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Dieter Message-Id: <20061120111952.4213dacb.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200611200004.AAA12714@sopwith.solgatos.com> References: <20061119100534.a37a6e5c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <200611200004.AAA12714@sopwith.solgatos.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:20:09 -0000 In response to Dieter : > > > The machine has 2 GB. I wonder if the process is getting its fair share? > > > I have been observing other problems where disk activity to one disk > > > will make an unrelated process reading data from a different disk *very* > > > unresponsive. > > > > Sounds like a hardware problem to me. If you've got a crappy SATA > > controller that's going to block every now and again, you're going to > > have trouble with this. > > Is the Nvidia "Nforce4 Ultra" chipset considered a crappy SATA controller? > There are 4 Seagate SATA drives, 1 Seagate PATA drive (all 7200.8 .9 or .10), > and 1 LG CD/DVD PATA drive. The PATA drives are idle during these tests. *shrug* I don't know their product lines to comment. I'm only speculating. "Crappy" could mean that the FreeBSD driver for those devices is problematic ... or it could mean you've got a marginal cable causing communication errors -- in brief, anything that could cause the drive to block as you describe, even if it's not specifically the hardware. > Doing dd between the disks and /dev/null it can do 40 MB/sec sustained at > the slow end and 65-70 MB/s at the fast end of the drives, limited by the > drives, and do this with all four SATA drives at once. It can do this > reading or writing if the disks' cache is turned on. With the disks' cache > turned off, the sustained write speed drops to about 1/10. > > But... if I do something like copy a large file from one disk to another, > and then do something that needs to read from a third disk, the new process > may hang for a very very long time. If I suspend (^Z) the copy process for > a moment, the new process gets its data. I suspect that the kernel is > letting the copy process kick everything else out of memory. To some extent > that makes sense. It is caching the most recently accessed data. What I > haven't figured out is why the new process is allowed to hang for so long. I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if the disks are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no one process "blocks", but they're all a little slower. It doesn't sound like that's what's happening. > I had thought of putting in a circular buffer, but figured that it should > be unnecessary since the normal Unix write-behind should buffer the > writes from the disk I/O for me. I'll give it a try, maybe it will help. First, use the /dev/null test to verify whether or not the disks really are the problem. You don't want to waste a lot of time on something that may be unrelated. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:23:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22AA16A732 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3161843D81 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:22:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAKGLMDP038528; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:21:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kAKGLMos038527; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:21:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:21:22 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Anna Rajsman Message-ID: <20061120162122.GA38498@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20061117214332.0F7285B21@mail.bitblocks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opera and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:23:13 -0000 On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 02:23:21PM +0100, Anna Rajsman wrote: > Hi again, > > I would like to apologize for the confusion I caused on Friday. > > Please read my explanation in my blog: > http://my.opera.com/annaraj/blog/2006/11/20/the-freebsd-accident > > Once again I am very sorry! No Problem. Learn something every day. Now, you are aware of FreeBSD - the premier UNIX OS for servers (as apposed to playtops). While you are at it, you might want to become familar with the FreeBSD 'ports' system, from which FreeBSD users can build and install Opera. ////jerry > > Best regards, > Anna > > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:43:31 +0100, Bakul Shah wrote: > > >"Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu" writes: > >>"Anna Rajsman" wrote: > >>> We would like to ask you if you would like to distribute the > >>> Opera browser with your OS? Or maybe you are doing it already? > >>> Would you like to sign a distribution agreement with Opera? > >> > >>Opera is in our ports framework, both the native version and the linux > >>version (both maintainers CC'ed). I don't know offhand if we distribute > >>the binaries on our CD images; from reading the licence I don't see the > >>any requirement to have a signed agreement for this, but if this is not > >>the case please let me know. > >> > >>I am using Opera as my primary browser since v3 or something, but I am > >>a little disappointed the the problems we're seeing on FreeBSD are > >>rarely addressed. And indeed the binaries you're producing are for > >>FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x while we will release 6.2 in a month. > > > >Speaking as a very happy Opera user, anything we can do to > >improve our (FreeBSD's) relationship with Opera is a huge win > >for us both. If it takes a signed agreement to make that > >relationship "official", I am all for it. Also, I hope that > >will result in improved support for the FreeBSD version of > >Opera and in turn we can provide testing, feedback, etc. to > >Opera. > > > >For me firefox-2.0 is still nowhere near as good as Opera and > >I'd like to see Opera get even better! Also, on FreeBSD the > >FreeBSD version uses less resources than the linux version. > > > >More generally I think we ought to get into such agreements > >with more companies. Particularly companies like Adobe as > >Flash is getting more and more pervasive (I understand that > >moving big comapnies can be very hard which is why we should > >first embrace as many smaller companies as we can and loudly > >proclaim such agreements on www.freebsd.org). > > > > -- > Anna Rajsman, Marketing and Sales Assistant > Tel: +47 2416 4354, mailto:Anna.Rajsman@opera.com > Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:24:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B19E16A58C for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CB243D53 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:24:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so889440nzh for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:24:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=R/AUb3le/8NO/INNOSXdRsSLZvXWQO7nJ0YS8v0guN0gl+TJNxs0RmPHXKgjrSqgmcS32T9YdsAXVAep2HjKrGfi84SN68BBWaCVJu47hUBb0ShRMu8f4T6Eg6oqnCoW9XuJGMoebBZ6G2aYS11oYg2hvoAq9+A1kd+uMynpQ9Q= Received: by 10.65.154.10 with SMTP id g10mr8233224qbo.1164039864584; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.20? ( [75.7.74.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d5sm10090991qbd.2006.11.20.08.24.23; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:24:24 -0800 (PST) From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: Rachel Florentine Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:23:25 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061120152707.69750.qmail@web57803.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061120152707.69750.qmail@web57803.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611201023.26074.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Translate This Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:24:39 -0000 On Monday 20 November 2006 09:27, Rachel Florentine wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Donald J. O'Neill > > > I see by the list, you found your answer, use ":" due to syntax. I am > > curious as to what the howto is that you're trying to follow. > > http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=ezmlm+%22create+a+list&fr=yfp-t-501&t >oggle=1&ei=UTF-8&u=binarios.com/lnb/ezmlm.html&w=ezmlm+%22create+a+list%22&d >=OSt3npIFNr73&icp=1&.intl=us Rachel > > > Thank you. I see that's a Linux procedure that comes from here: http://binarios.com/lnb/ezmlm.html Are you sure you want to follow Linux procedure? It's not going to use the ports system at all. You might be better served following a BSD procedure such as found here: http://freebsdrocks.net/ There are others that you can use that have been written for FreeBSD. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:27:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB65916A415 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3423743DA2 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:26:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAKGPDjj038563; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:25:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kAKGPDBA038562; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:25:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:25:13 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Aaron Martinez Message-ID: <20061120162512.GB38498@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4561D4A6.10702@proficuous.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4561D4A6.10702@proficuous.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ping send to problem, what am i missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:27:09 -0000 On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:15:34AM -0600, Aaron Martinez wrote: > I'm trying to get some routing working from my freebsd 6.1 machine that > i thought should be extremely easy, but not having any luck. When > trying to ping the destination address (192.168.5.6) i get : "ping: > sendto: Invalid argument" Well, since it seems that 'ping' is the one that is complaining, you might include exactly the ping command that you have been typing in your post. (Or have you actually been trying to use the 'sendto' directly in a program - if so send that information). ////jerry > > the net goes like so: freebsd6.1----linux router-----another linux > router---openbsd machine (running openvpn) > > the corresponding routing tables are as such: > > freebsd6.1: > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default 192.168.3.94 UGS 1 121441 fxp0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 > 192.168.3.64/27 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 > 192.168.3.94 00:40:f4:76:3d:d3 UHLW 2 106622 fxp0 1154 > 192.168.4.1/32 192.168.4.5 UGS 0 2042 tun0 > 192.168.4.5 192.168.4.6 UH 1 0 tun0 > 192.168.5 192.168.0.66 UGS 0 154 fxp0 > > > I manually added the 192.168.5 route using the following command (please > correct me if i did it incorrectly > > route -n add 192.168.5/24 192.168.0.66 > > > first linux router: > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt > Iface > 192.168.3.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth0 > 192.168.3.96 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth2 > 192.168.3.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth1 > 192.168.3.160 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth4 > 192.168.3.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth3 > 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.62 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 > eth0 > > > second linux router: > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt > Iface > 192.168.3.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth3 > 192.168.3.96 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 > eth3 > 192.168.3.64 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 > eth3 > 192.168.3.160 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 > eth3 > 192.168.3.128 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 > eth3 > 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 > eth2 > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 > eth1 > 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 > eth0 > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 40 0 0 > dsl1 > > > openbsd machine: > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu > Interface > default 192.168.0.254 UGS 5 516934 - rl0 > 127/8 127.0.0.1 UGRS 0 0 33224 lo0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 125 33224 lo0 > 192.168.0/24 link#1 UC 2 0 - rl0 > 192.168.0.2 00:d0:b7:8f:51:41 UHLc 0 5 - rl0 > 192.168.0.254 00:e0:18:90:17:f1 UHLc 1 0 - rl0 > 192.168.4/24 192.168.4.2 UGS 0 2042 - tun0 > 192.168.4.2 192.168.4.1 UH 1 0 - tun0 > 192.168.5/24 192.168.5.2 UGS 0 3411 - tun1 > 192.168.5.2 192.168.5.1 UH 1 5 - tun1 > 224/4 127.0.0.1 URS 0 0 33224 lo0 > > > i can successfully ping the 192.168.0.66 host with no problems, so i'm > guessing that most of my routes are fine, i am a little suspect however > about the route i manually put in. I can also ping the 192.168.5.6 > address FROM the openbsd machine. All firewalls between these machines > ARE disabled. i DO have ip forwarding enabled on the OPENBSD machine: > # sysctl -a | grep > forward > > net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 > > > I can't figure what's going on here any help would be terribly > appreciated. Any more info that is needed just ask. > > thanks in advance, > > Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:34:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36F416A492 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ipmail02.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail02.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B642243EAF for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:30:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ppp147-42.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO alpha.home) ([121.44.147.42]) by ipmail02.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2006 03:00:46 +1030 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAHNlYUV5LJMq/2dsb2JhbACBRg X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,440,1157293800"; d="scan'208"; a="48784970:sNHT25716922" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: FreeBSD Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:00:44 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611210300.44989.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: FTP proxy server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:34:22 -0000 My company uses Squid as an HTTP proxy server under FreeBSD, serving Windows, FreeBSD, and Linux clients -- Squid is quite high profile and therefore seemed to be a reasonable choice. For FTP proxy server there are a number available in the ports but I don't see anything that stands out. I tend to favour ftpproxy for the straightforward name or frox for the weird name and claimed similarity (and perhaps cooperation) with Squid. The FTP clients that matter will be on FreeBSD or Linux boxes. Does any one have some recommendations wrt either of these -- or some other FTP proxy server software. Any thoughts please, Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:42:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C8216A412 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@proficuous.com) Received: from mail.proficuous.com (www.proficuous.com [209.240.79.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AAC43F64 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:33:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@proficuous.com) Received: from [192.168.3.68] (unknown [192.168.3.68]) by mail.proficuous.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEEAA8ACEF; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:33:29 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4561D8DD.90208@proficuous.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:33:33 -0600 From: Aaron Martinez User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry McAllister References: <4561D4A6.10702@proficuous.com> <20061120162512.GB38498@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20061120162512.GB38498@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ping send to problem, what am i missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:42:44 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:15:34AM -0600, Aaron Martinez wrote: > > >> I'm trying to get some routing working from my freebsd 6.1 machine that >> i thought should be extremely easy, but not having any luck. When >> trying to ping the destination address (192.168.5.6) i get : "ping: >> sendto: Invalid argument" >> > > Well, since it seems that 'ping' is the one that is complaining, > you might include exactly the ping command that you have been > typing in your post. (Or have you actually been trying to use > the 'sendto' directly in a program - if so send that information). > > ////jerry > ping 192.168.5.6 as well as /sbin/ping 192.168.5.6 traceroute gives me a similar responese: /usr/sbin/traceroute 192.168.5.6 traceroute to 192.168.5.6 (192.168.5.6), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets traceroute: sendto: Invalid argument 1 traceroute: wrote 192.168.5.6 40 chars, ret=-1 *traceroute: sendto: Invalid argument traceroute: wrote 192.168.5.6 40 chars, ret=-1 *traceroute: sendto: Invalid argument traceroute: wrote 192.168.5.6 40 chars, ret=-1 Aaron > >> the net goes like so: freebsd6.1----linux router-----another linux >> router---openbsd machine (running openvpn) >> >> the corresponding routing tables are as such: >> >> freebsd6.1: >> Internet: >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire >> default 192.168.3.94 UGS 1 121441 fxp0 >> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 >> 192.168.3.64/27 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 >> 192.168.3.94 00:40:f4:76:3d:d3 UHLW 2 106622 fxp0 1154 >> 192.168.4.1/32 192.168.4.5 UGS 0 2042 tun0 >> 192.168.4.5 192.168.4.6 UH 1 0 tun0 >> 192.168.5 192.168.0.66 UGS 0 154 fxp0 >> >> >> I manually added the 192.168.5 route using the following command (please >> correct me if i did it incorrectly >> >> route -n add 192.168.5/24 192.168.0.66 >> >> >> first linux router: >> Kernel IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt >> Iface >> 192.168.3.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth0 >> 192.168.3.96 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth2 >> 192.168.3.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth1 >> 192.168.3.160 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth4 >> 192.168.3.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.62 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 >> eth0 >> >> >> second linux router: >> Kernel IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt >> Iface >> 192.168.3.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 192.168.3.96 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 192.168.3.64 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 192.168.3.160 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 192.168.3.128 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 >> eth2 >> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 >> eth1 >> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 >> eth0 >> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 40 0 0 >> dsl1 >> >> >> openbsd machine: >> Routing tables >> >> Internet: >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu >> Interface >> default 192.168.0.254 UGS 5 516934 - rl0 >> 127/8 127.0.0.1 UGRS 0 0 33224 lo0 >> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 125 33224 lo0 >> 192.168.0/24 link#1 UC 2 0 - rl0 >> 192.168.0.2 00:d0:b7:8f:51:41 UHLc 0 5 - rl0 >> 192.168.0.254 00:e0:18:90:17:f1 UHLc 1 0 - rl0 >> 192.168.4/24 192.168.4.2 UGS 0 2042 - tun0 >> 192.168.4.2 192.168.4.1 UH 1 0 - tun0 >> 192.168.5/24 192.168.5.2 UGS 0 3411 - tun1 >> 192.168.5.2 192.168.5.1 UH 1 5 - tun1 >> 224/4 127.0.0.1 URS 0 0 33224 lo0 >> >> >> i can successfully ping the 192.168.0.66 host with no problems, so i'm >> guessing that most of my routes are fine, i am a little suspect however >> about the route i manually put in. I can also ping the 192.168.5.6 >> address FROM the openbsd machine. All firewalls between these machines >> ARE disabled. i DO have ip forwarding enabled on the OPENBSD machine: >> # sysctl -a | grep >> forward >> >> net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 >> >> >> I can't figure what's going on here any help would be terribly >> appreciated. Any more info that is needed just ask. >> >> thanks in advance, >> >> Aaron >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 16:47:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F365816A500 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@auriga.webchance-net.de) Received: from auriga.webchance-net.de (auriga.webchance-net.de [194.6.194.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C25643FD1 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:34:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from www@auriga.webchance-net.de) Received: from www by auriga.webchance-net.de with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GmC5u-0000N5-Po for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:34:06 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: eBay Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:34:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Message From eBay Member X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: deborah_desire@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:47:29 -0000 eBay [ltCurve.gif] Question about Item -- Respond Now [rtCurve.gif] [s.gif] eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member through My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member directly and will include your email address. [s.gif] [s.gif] [s.gif] [s.gif] Question from 715nick [s.gif] [1]715nick( [2]33 [iconYellowStar_25x25.gif] ) [s.gif] Positive feedback: 100% [s.gif] Member since: Nov-10-04 [s.gif] Location: ND, United States [s.gif] Registered on: www.ebay.com [s.gif] This message was sent while the listing was active. 715nick is a potential buyer. [s.gif] Hi, Is the item still available for sale? , Let me know because or I'm online and I can pay you right now. Respond to this question [s.gif] [3]Respond Now [s.gif] Responses in My Messages will not include your email address. Thank you, eBay [s.gif] Details for item number: 290046672352 Item URL: [4]http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=290046672352&ssp agename=ADME:B:AAQ:US:1 End date: Nov-10 -06 05:47:31 PDT [s.gif] Marketplace Safety Tip [5]Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transactions on eBay - it's the safer way to trade. Is this message an offer to buy your item directly through email without winning the item on eBay? If so, please help make the eBay marketplace safer by reporting it to us. These "outside of eBay" transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. [6]Learn more about trading safely. [s.gif] [s.gif] Is this email inappropriate? Does it violate [7]eBay policy? Help protect the Community by [8]reporting it. [s.gif] [s.gif] [s.gif] [s.gif] Learn how you can protect yourself from spoof (fake) emails at: [9]http://pages.ebay.com/education/spooftutorial This eBay notice was sent to you on behalf of another eBay member through the eBay platform and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. If you would like to receive this email in text format, change your [10]notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies. Privacy Policy: [11]http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/privacy-policy.html User Agreement: [12]http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/user-agreement.html Copyright © 2006 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc. eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125. [home;tile=1;sz=1x1;ord=538968386?] References 1. http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=715nick&sspagename=ADME:B:AAQ:US:2 2. http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=715nick 3. ftp://guest:guest@211.22.92.202/signin.ebay.com.ws.eBayISAPI.dllSignIn&co_partnerId=2&pUserId=&siteid=0&pageType=&pa1=&i1=&bshowgif=&UsingSSL.html 4. ftp://guest:guest@211.22.92.202/signin.ebay.com.ws.eBayISAPI.dllSignIn&co_partnerId=2&pUserId=&siteid=0&pageType=&pa1=&i1=&bshowgif=&UsingSSL.html 5. http://pages.ebay.com/securitycenter 6. http://pages.ebay.com/securitycenter/selling_safely.html 7. http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/rfe-unwelcome-email-misuse.html 8. http://cgi1.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ReportEmailAbuseshow&reporteruserid=randybru&reporteduserid=715nick&emaildate=2006/07/25:15:15:37&emailtype=0&emailtext=Hey+Randy+I+was+also+wondering+how+to+buy+it+now+and+if+you+would+accept+paypal+or+possilbly+meet+and+I+would+take+the+bike+off+your+hands+for+%243500+cash+in+hand+Thanks+Again+Nick&trackId=2655020174 9. http://pages.ebay.com/education/spooftutorial 10. http://cgi4.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?OptinLoginShow 11. http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/privacy-policy.html 12. http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/user-agreement.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 17:00:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2B616A579 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.zw) Received: from smtp.africaonline.co.zw (smtp.africaonline.co.zw [216.104.192.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B0F43DA0 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:39:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.zw) Received: from smtp.africaonline.co.zw (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 9036E238DE; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:39:48 +0200 (SAST) Received: from crm.africaonline.co.zw (unknown [216.104.192.14]) by smtp.africaonline.co.zw (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759C41E303; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:39:46 +0200 (SAST) From: Peter Nyamukusa Organization: Africa Online To: "Donald J. O'Neill" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:46:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <902576.81196.qm@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> <200611200613.27873.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200611200613.27873.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611201846.01623.petern@africaonline.co.zw> X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.11.20.82833 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED 0, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC 0, __CD 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: gahn Subject: Re: installation of freeradius X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: petern@africaonline.co.zw List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:00:49 -0000 On Monday 20 November 2006 14:13, Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > On Monday 20 November 2006 05:47, gahn wrote: > > hi all: > > > > > > i am having trouble to get freeradius installed: > > > > ===> Installing for openldap-client-2.3.29 > > > > ===> openldap-client-2.3.29 conflicts with installed > > package(s): > > openldap-client-2.2.30 > > > > They install files into the same place. > > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/openldap23-client. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > i can't remove the "openldap-client-2.2.30" since > > other packages depend on it, but without the > > "openldap-client-2.3.29", i can't get freeradius > > going. > > > > any idea to solve this delimma? > > > > regards > > > > _ming > > You can follow the instructions that you have up above. > > # pkg_delete -f openldap-client-2.2.30 > > # cd /usr/ports/net/openldap23-client > # make install > - or - > # pkg_add -vr openldap23-client > > # pkgdb -Ff > change the dependancies to the new openldap23-client. > Then try installing freeradius. > > Don Hi you can also install freeradius with mysql support, I have a box running with vexim, freeradius, msql & mailman for my vpop users and radius authentication Regards Peter Nyamukusa (CCNA, MCSE, A+) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 17:07:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12F916A508 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77CB444CE for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:46:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GmCI5-0003zM-8n for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:46:41 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAKGnaeN046040 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:49:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kAKGnaQl046039 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:49:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:49:36 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <4561D4A6.10702@proficuous.com> In-Reply-To: <4561D4A6.10702@proficuous.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611201049.36275.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79200374bd7a82ade20f67e8a44f56f196350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: ping send to problem, what am i missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:07:30 -0000 On Monday 20 November 2006 10:15, Aaron Martinez wrote: > I'm trying to get some routing working from my freebsd 6.1 machine that > i thought should be extremely easy, but not having any luck. When > trying to ping the destination address (192.168.5.6) i get : "ping: > sendto: Invalid argument" > > the net goes like so: freebsd6.1----linux router-----another linux > router---openbsd machine (running openvpn) > > the corresponding routing tables are as such: > > freebsd6.1: > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default 192.168.3.94 UGS 1 121441 fxp0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 > 192.168.3.64/27 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 > 192.168.3.94 00:40:f4:76:3d:d3 UHLW 2 106622 fxp0 1154 > 192.168.4.1/32 192.168.4.5 UGS 0 2042 tun0 > 192.168.4.5 192.168.4.6 UH 1 0 tun0 > 192.168.5 192.168.0.66 UGS 0 154 fxp0 > > > I manually added the 192.168.5 route using the following command (please > correct me if i did it incorrectly > > route -n add 192.168.5/24 192.168.0.66 > > > first linux router: > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt > Iface > 192.168.3.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth0 > 192.168.3.96 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth2 > 192.168.3.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth1 > 192.168.3.160 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth4 > 192.168.3.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth3 > 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.62 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 > eth0 > > > second linux router: > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt > Iface > 192.168.3.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 > eth3 > 192.168.3.96 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 > eth3 > 192.168.3.64 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 > eth3 > 192.168.3.160 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 > eth3 > 192.168.3.128 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 > eth3 > 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 > eth2 > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 > eth1 > 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 > eth0 > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 40 0 0 > dsl1 > > > openbsd machine: > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu > Interface > default 192.168.0.254 UGS 5 516934 - rl0 > 127/8 127.0.0.1 UGRS 0 0 33224 lo0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 125 33224 lo0 > 192.168.0/24 link#1 UC 2 0 - rl0 > 192.168.0.2 00:d0:b7:8f:51:41 UHLc 0 5 - rl0 > 192.168.0.254 00:e0:18:90:17:f1 UHLc 1 0 - rl0 > 192.168.4/24 192.168.4.2 UGS 0 2042 - tun0 > 192.168.4.2 192.168.4.1 UH 1 0 - tun0 > 192.168.5/24 192.168.5.2 UGS 0 3411 - tun1 > 192.168.5.2 192.168.5.1 UH 1 5 - tun1 > 224/4 127.0.0.1 URS 0 0 33224 lo0 > > > i can successfully ping the 192.168.0.66 host with no problems, so i'm > guessing that most of my routes are fine, i am a little suspect however > about the route i manually put in. I can also ping the 192.168.5.6 > address FROM the openbsd machine. All firewalls between these machines > ARE disabled. i DO have ip forwarding enabled on the OPENBSD machine: > # sysctl -a | grep > forward > > net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 > > > I can't figure what's going on here any help would be terribly > appreciated. Any more info that is needed just ask. > > thanks in advance, > > Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Aaron, It looks like the FreeBSD and the OpenBSD machines are vpn tunnelling through the linux routers, right? If that is the case then you really shouldn't have to mess around with manual routing tables, at all. You should be looking at the OpenVPN configuration. If I was working on this problem, I'd first shut down openvpn and verify that FreeBSD and OpenBSD can talk along their default routes (it looks like they each have only one nic, so the default routes will be used). Next, after I am able to verify clear communication from both sides, I'd start working on the OpenVPN configuration. When configured correctly the openvpn server will push an appropriate route to the client, and presto! VPN. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 17:07:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA6916A4B3 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AFD44516 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:48:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kAKGm0s4009768; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:48:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Message-ID: <4561DC3F.20401@vidican.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:47:59 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <455E1159.9000605@wmptl.com> <444psut9k4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <444psut9k4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP pavillion dv8000 hotkey mappings (solved) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:07:49 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Nathan Vidican writes: > > >> Does anyone know how to make use of the hotkeys for multimedia >> functions? (ie: play/pause, stop, prev, next, vol-up, vol-down, mute, >> etc) ... Have found several articles on these machines, but most >> pertaining to the way one particular linux distro vs another makes use >> of these keys. >> >> Most specifically, I'd like to get them to work from within kde, mixer >> function more than anything (need quick mute/vol-up/down - could live >> without the rest). I'm just not sure where/how to map the keys using >> freebsd/xorg? >> >> Hoping it'll be something simple, but what? - or is this something >> more complex regarding acpi ? >> >> Any ideas, suggestions, comments, or redirects greatly appreciated. >> > > If they produce x events (check with xev), then they can be mapped > like any other event. I recently had such a keyboard, however, and > those keys didn't produce any events. I didn't have a chance to play > with it much, though; I had to get rid of it for unrelated reasons. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Sorry for asking, lol - `man xmodmap` ;) problem solved, all is working well now. Thank you -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 17:22:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D5A16A506 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from YRaffah@savola.com) Received: from kansai.savoladns.com (kansai.savoladns.com [212.12.174.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1A7944320 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:06:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from YRaffah@savola.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kansai.savoladns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D3A102A6 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:10:05 +0300 (AST) Received: from kansai.savoladns.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kansai.savoladns.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02143-03 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:09:48 +0300 (AST) Received: from HQJED-EX01.hqsa.savola.lan (unknown [192.168.2.16]) by kansai.savoladns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB754102A4 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:09:47 +0300 (AST) Received: from 222.22.1.105 ([222.22.1.105]) by HQJED-EX01.hqsa.savola.lan ([192.168.2.15]) via Exchange Front-End Server hqjed-fe01.hqsa.savola.lan ([192.168.2.14]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:02:16 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="=-9K4LcOA5IKpcFDIoZG5j" Received: from redevil by hqjed-fe01.hqsa.savola.lan; 20 Nov 2006 20:05:57 +0300 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:05:56 +0300 Message-ID: <1164042356.1699.25.camel@redevil.savola.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD theme for the community Thread-Index: AccMxaGWx4JdbiZbTUKeJb/tb+li3w== From: "Yousef Adnan Raffah" To: "FreeBSD Questions" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at savola.com Subject: FreeBSD theme for the community X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Yousef Adnan Raffah List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:22:19 -0000 --=-9K4LcOA5IKpcFDIoZG5j Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Everyone, I'm sorry for posting this here but I would really like you to guide me where to post this? As a small gift to the FreeBSD and all the BSD foundation, I created this little theme for my mobile SE K800i and released it under the BSD license. http://digg.com/linux_unix/FreeBSD_Theme_for_SE_K800i Please let me hear your comments and suggestions.. Sincerely, Yousef Raffah --=-9K4LcOA5IKpcFDIoZG5j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFYeB0qG4sHeIU6qURAg3lAJ9Xq/gVQCWAXpjwlnGNC4lm8MskWQCfSNE3 WvIMsBrEol+2JiiQ9mQKMxs= =fHhI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9K4LcOA5IKpcFDIoZG5j-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 17:25:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0F816A4D1 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:25:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D3344479 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:10:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C5B5F5F; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:10:57 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UPGp1CiY0mRU; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:10:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-95-165.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.95.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2EA5CF0; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:10:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4561E19B.7050706@mac.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:10:51 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: <454E9F7B.5010105@outstep.com> <454EB6D6.3030807@infowest.com> <454EBEEC.1060002@u.washington.edu> <454F210C.9000602@outstep.com> <004001c70706$0d571ec0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <62104DC1-8AD2-41E1-B469-51CAC91A8D8B@mac.com> <002701c70c85$db821eb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> In-Reply-To: <002701c70c85$db821eb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lonnie Cumberland , cremes.devlist@mac.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:25:30 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: [ ... ] >>> The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that >>> runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very >>> difficult to compile on MacOSX. >> This is completely wrong. Take a look at macports [1] (formerly >> darwinports) for a large repository of UNIX software that compiles >> very cleanly on OSX. It's nearly 7 years since OSX shipped to the >> public. In that time, most opensource software was updated to compile >> cleanly on OSX. The primary changes to allow this were to the >> "configure" scripts so they recognize darwin as a base OS. If other >> patches were necessary, most software maintainers accepted these >> patches back into their trunk. > > I spent a lot of time trying to build KDE on Panther and end up at a > dead end. There's many problems there. That's not a very specific bug report. It's at least possible that reading this would help: http://developer.apple.com/opensource/tools/runningx11.html > A lot I understand were fixed in Tiger and there's somewhat of alpha > binaries out there - but they must use magic to build them. No magic. A guy called Torrey Lyons (sp?), who used to be a Darwin developer and ran (runs?) the XonX project, IIRC, did most of the work to port and integrate X11 with OS X, and got things like pasteboard integration and rootless X11 support, way back in the Rhapsody and 10.1/10.2 days. 10.3 and 10.4 should have shipped with a reasonable X11R6 distribution available as an optional installation item. > In any case, Tiger won't run on anything that doesen't have firewire > so you can just toss out your older iMacs right there. Apple recommends you run Tiger on G4 or later hardware, but I believe that Tiger will run on G3 hardware if you can get a DVD drive attached. Given that the G3 machines came out in what-- 1998?-- the situation is probably more to Apple's credit than to its detriment. Frankly, if you need to throw out 8-year-old machines in order to run the latest version of the OS, and you've gotten 8 years of decent utilization out of the hardware during that time, you're way ahead of the typical 3-year depreciation cycle for business PCs. Ted, you do know that Win98 & ME simply won't run on modern PCIe motherboards, right? You do know that XP and Vista don't run, or run with extreme compromises to video support and performance, on Pentium-pro machines without AGP or with maybe AGPx1 slots with say, a 4MB Riva128 card? > Command line programs do compile, but you have to make > many changes in some of them. Macports is fine if the program you want is > in there. If not and your rolling it yourself, then you better know > what your doing. It helps to know what you are doing, regardless of the platform or the software in use. >> OSX has excellent support for most UNIX software. > > Uh, huh. Yeah, right. OSX has excellent support for the Unix software I want to run. > There's not a lot of UNIX software out there that supports all > the major flavors of UNIX very well, which is why the FreeBSD ports > system is so important for FreeBSD. Or pkgsrc for NetBSD, or Fink for MacOS X, or RPMs for Linux. > And unfortunately more and more > UNIX software is being written and built on Linux and not tested > on FreeBSD. Take mysql for example, it's heavily dependent on > threads and while the FreeBSD threads implementation is superior > to the Linux implementation, mysql didn't work at all with it until > recently, and it doesen't work as well as under Linux. With due respect for the FreeBSD developers, it's not at all clear to me that FreeBSD has a better threads implementation than Linux. I've seen lots of results favoring one or the other, although it seems clear that mysql in particular has been tuned closely with and for Linux. Of course, Solaris has been targetting highly parallel systems (with 64, 128 or more CPUs or CPU threads of execution) since before Linux was first released, and Sun's been optimizing Solaris for highly multithreaded Java apps for quite some time. For that matter, multithreaded Java performance is a fairly high priority at Apple, too, but Apple doesn't sell hardware with dozens or hundreds of CPUs. There are plenty of other reasonable choices besides MySQL, however-- postgres or OpenBase come to mind, or even the classic BerkeleyDB for some cases. I think postgres and FreeBSD make a fine combination. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 17:37:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2895916A53E for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:37:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@proficuous.com) Received: from mail.proficuous.com (www.proficuous.com [209.240.79.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39834447D for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:29:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@proficuous.com) Received: from [192.168.3.68] (unknown [192.168.3.68]) by mail.proficuous.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C006A8ACFB; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:29:41 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4561E608.1040903@proficuous.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:29:44 -0600 From: Aaron Martinez User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lane References: <4561D4A6.10702@proficuous.com> <200611201049.36275.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: <200611201049.36275.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ping send to problem, what am i missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:37:52 -0000 Lane wrote: > On Monday 20 November 2006 10:15, Aaron Martinez wrote: > >> I'm trying to get some routing working from my freebsd 6.1 machine that >> i thought should be extremely easy, but not having any luck. When >> trying to ping the destination address (192.168.5.6) i get : "ping: >> sendto: Invalid argument" >> >> the net goes like so: freebsd6.1----linux router-----another linux >> router---openbsd machine (running openvpn) >> >> the corresponding routing tables are as such: >> >> freebsd6.1: >> Internet: >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire >> default 192.168.3.94 UGS 1 121441 fxp0 >> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 >> 192.168.3.64/27 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 >> 192.168.3.94 00:40:f4:76:3d:d3 UHLW 2 106622 fxp0 1154 >> 192.168.4.1/32 192.168.4.5 UGS 0 2042 tun0 >> 192.168.4.5 192.168.4.6 UH 1 0 tun0 >> 192.168.5 192.168.0.66 UGS 0 154 fxp0 >> >> >> I manually added the 192.168.5 route using the following command (please >> correct me if i did it incorrectly >> >> route -n add 192.168.5/24 192.168.0.66 >> >> >> first linux router: >> Kernel IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt >> Iface >> 192.168.3.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth0 >> 192.168.3.96 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth2 >> 192.168.3.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth1 >> 192.168.3.160 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth4 >> 192.168.3.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.62 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 >> eth0 >> >> >> second linux router: >> Kernel IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt >> Iface >> 192.168.3.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 192.168.3.96 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 192.168.3.64 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 192.168.3.160 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 192.168.3.128 192.168.3.34 255.255.255.224 UG 40 0 0 >> eth3 >> 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 >> eth2 >> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 >> eth1 >> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 >> eth0 >> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 40 0 0 >> dsl1 >> >> >> openbsd machine: >> Routing tables >> >> Internet: >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu >> Interface >> default 192.168.0.254 UGS 5 516934 - rl0 >> 127/8 127.0.0.1 UGRS 0 0 33224 lo0 >> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 125 33224 lo0 >> 192.168.0/24 link#1 UC 2 0 - rl0 >> 192.168.0.2 00:d0:b7:8f:51:41 UHLc 0 5 - rl0 >> 192.168.0.254 00:e0:18:90:17:f1 UHLc 1 0 - rl0 >> 192.168.4/24 192.168.4.2 UGS 0 2042 - tun0 >> 192.168.4.2 192.168.4.1 UH 1 0 - tun0 >> 192.168.5/24 192.168.5.2 UGS 0 3411 - tun1 >> 192.168.5.2 192.168.5.1 UH 1 5 - tun1 >> 224/4 127.0.0.1 URS 0 0 33224 lo0 >> >> >> i can successfully ping the 192.168.0.66 host with no problems, so i'm >> guessing that most of my routes are fine, i am a little suspect however >> about the route i manually put in. I can also ping the 192.168.5.6 >> address FROM the openbsd machine. All firewalls between these machines >> ARE disabled. i DO have ip forwarding enabled on the OPENBSD machine: >> # sysctl -a | grep >> forward >> >> net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 >> >> I can't figure what's going on here any help would be terribly >> appreciated. Any more info that is needed just ask. >> >> thanks in advance, >> >> Aaron >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Aaron, > > It looks like the FreeBSD and the OpenBSD machines are vpn tunnelling through > the linux routers, right? > Not exactly. I have one openvpn tunnel from my freebsd6.1 machine to the openbsd machine via the 192.168.4.0 interface. There is another vpn from a window's machine on a network connected to first linux router in the above mentioned netowrk. what i'm trying to do is connect (not through the vpn connection i have from my freebsed ---> openbsd machine, but from the standard fxp0 on my freebsd machine to the openbsd box, at which time the openbsd machine should route me through to the 192.168.5.x network. As i said previously i CAN ping directly to the 192.168.0.66 machine but for some reason not to the 192.168.5.x network. Since i am getting no information from the openbsd machine about the 192.168.5.x network, i need to manually add the route. Essentially it's safe to forget at the 192.168.4.x network.. that's seperate. > If that is the case then you really shouldn't have to mess around with manual > routing tables, at all. You should be looking at the OpenVPN configuration. > > If I was working on this problem, I'd first shut down openvpn and verify that > FreeBSD and OpenBSD can talk along their default routes (it looks like they > each have only one nic, so the default routes will be used). > > Next, after I am able to verify clear communication from both sides, I'd start > working on the OpenVPN configuration. When configured correctly the openvpn > server will push an appropriate route to the client, and presto! VPN. > > lane > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > One very important piece of information that i think is the key here, I set up tcpdump on all of the linux and openbsd machines looking for icmp from my host as such: tcpdump -i ethx host 192.168.3.68 and icmp I get no packets at all on any of the machines when pinging the 192.168.5.6 address but when i ping 192.168.0.66 i see them clearly: tcpdump: listening on eth1 11:19:08.166549 192.168.3.68 > 192.168.0.66: icmp: echo request 11:19:08.166968 192.168.0.66 > 192.168.3.68: icmp: echo reply 11:19:09.167387 192.168.3.68 > 192.168.0.66: icmp: echo request 11:19:09.167794 192.168.0.66 > 192.168.3.68: icmp: echo reply 11:19:10.168507 192.168.3.68 > 192.168.0.66: icmp: echo request 11:19:10.168904 192.168.0.66 > 192.168.3.68: icmp: echo reply 11:19:11.169615 192.168.3.68 > 192.168.0.66: icmp: echo request 11:19:11.170013 192.168.0.66 > 192.168.3.68: icmp: echo reply This leads me back to the manual route that i put in. It seems that something is amiss with that as there are no packets heading for the 192.168.0.66 machine when i try to ping 192.168.5.6.. ideas???/ thanks, Aaron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 17:39:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E5316A533 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niek@bigfoot.com) Received: from smtp-2.orange.nl (smtp-2.orange.nl [193.252.22.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB6D43F87 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:34:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from niek@bigfoot.com) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf6101.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2500E1C0008A for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:34:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (s5591888a.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.145.136.138]) by mwinf6101.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B05821C0008F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:34:15 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20061120173415722.B05821C0008F@mwinf6101.orange.nl Message-ID: <4561E714.1080700@bigfoot.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:34:12 +0100 From: Niek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl-NL; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061030 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: problem with mod_proxy_ajp since upgrade to 6.2_rc1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:39:20 -0000 Today I upgraded a test server from 6.2_beta2 to 6.2_rc1. I am using apache 2.2.3 with mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp to connect to Tomcat 5.5.20. This configuration used to work well, but after the upgrade, connections via the ajp proxy are extremely slow. It seems as if something is timing out, as it takes several minutes until apache returns data. Connecting directly to Tomcat Coyote ports works well. There is nothing in the httpd error logs or the tomcat logs, nor in the system message log indicating what is going wrong. I hope someone on this list can help me finding the problem. Below is an excerpt of my httpd.conf: LoadModule proxy_module libexec/apache22/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_ajp_module libexec/apache22/mod_proxy_ajp.so ProxyRequests Off Order Deny,Allow Deny from all Allow from [my ip] ProxyPass ajp://localhost:8009/ SSLrequireSSL Niek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 18:09:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F020016A407 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lolarch@tiscali.co.uk) Received: from mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C66843D64 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:09:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lolarch@tiscali.co.uk) Received: from mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.47]) by mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2006 18:00:22 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAOV8YUXUSnIvh2dsb2JhbACCaoRPDoUFAQEJDio Received: from 80-42-2-18.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([80.42.2.18]:1510 helo=home1) by mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1GmDRL-000CBg-9C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:00:19 +0000 Message-ID: <000501c70ccd$bb0849a0$0300a8c0@home1> From: "lol" To: Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:00:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:28:23 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: usb advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:09:50 -0000 can I put 2 devices onto one usb plug. I'd like to solder an internal card reader and a usb socket onto one usb = plug so that I can plug it in to the internal usb socket on the usb = card,is this possible? Many thanks for your help Lol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 18:55:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0717E16A492 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD0143D45 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:55:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id kAKIsjtI012102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:54:49 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAKIsXbA006810; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:54:33 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kAKIsWZ1006809; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:54:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:54:32 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Evgeniy Belomestnov Message-ID: <20061120185432.GA6676@kobe.laptop> References: <10B85DC5-2B64-4878-8D97-91C0E3F0A027@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10B85DC5-2B64-4878-8D97-91C0E3F0A027@mac.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.426, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.77, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail and network aliases X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:55:31 -0000 On 2006-11-12 21:16, Evgeniy Belomestnov wrote: > Hello! > > I have FreeBSD-6.1 machine with two network interfaces: one for > private network, one for internet. Network interface for > internet has some aliases. I need to configure mail relay for > some domains at this computer. Can I configure my MTA > (Sendmail) to send outgoing e-mail for different domains via > particular network interface but with different IP-addresses > (aliases). For example, to send e-mail for DOMAIN1 via > INTERFACE1.ALIAS1, for DOMAIN2 via INTERFACE1.ALIAS2, for > DOMAIN3 via INTERFACE1.ALIAS3 and so on. On 2006-11-19 12:34, Evgeniy Belomestnov wrote: > Hello! > > I have FreeBSD-6.1 machine with two network interfaces: one for > private network, one for internet. Network interface for > internet has some aliases. I need to configure mail relay for > some domains at this computer. Can I configure my MTA > (Sendmail) to send e-mail for different domains via particular > network interface but with different IP-addresses (aliases)? > For example, to send e-mail for DOMAIN1 via INTEREFACE1.ALIAS1, > for DOMAIN2 via INTERFACE1.ALIAS2, for DOMAIN3 via > INTERFACE1.ALIAS3 and so on. Hi Evgeniy, I'm not sure I understand the original question, and I have stared at the first copy of this post for quite a while (I still had it in my INBOX, when you reposted today). If I understand correctly what you want to do, you can use the `mailertable' feature of Sendmail. An example of how this feature works is described below: When my laptop is connected through our internal network at work, I want to send all outgoing email messages to my default SMTP AUTH account, but still forward all the work-related email to our internal SMTP server. This means that, depending on the recipient address of each message, I want it to go to: smtp.relay.host mail.company.com To set this up, I have in my `/etc/mail/sendmail.mc' file the lines: dnl All outgoing email is sent to `smtp.relay.host' through the dnl `relay' mailer. Exceptions, i.e. for any domains which need dnl special handling, use `esmtp' or another mailer, through dnl `mailertable'. define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp.relay.host') define(`RELAY_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 587') dnl Instead of putting all the SMTP AUTH credentials in `access', dnl I like using a separate map for this. The `authinfo' feature dnl works fine for this: FEATURE(`authinfo', `hash /etc/mail/authinfo') dnl Allow mail routing exceptions through a mailer table. FEATURE(`mailertable', `hash /etc/mail/mailertable') Then, in my `/etc/mail/mailertable' file I have an entry for the domain of our company: # Custom mail routing rules. company.com smtp:mail.company.com .company.com smtp:mail.company.com You can have an arbitrary number of entries in your `mailertable' file. For more details, look at the Sendmail README file for a description of this feature: /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README or to the online documentation of Sendmail, at: "Sendmail cf/README - Using Mailertables" http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html I hope this helps a bit, - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 19:35:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCEF16A416 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielg@opera.com) Received: from sam.opera.com (sam.opera.com [193.69.113.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7ED43E94 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:30:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielg@opera.com) Received: from daniel_goldman.hsd1.md.comcast.net (c-68-33-83-61.hsd1.md.comcast.net [68.33.83.61]) (authenticated bits=0) by sam.opera.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id kAKJV7rt002868 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:31:09 GMT Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:31:05 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Daniel Goldman" Organization: Opera Software Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (Win32) Subject: The Opera browser on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:35:21 -0000 I was just made aware of the recent discussion here about Opera and = FreeBSD. Some of you pointed out that Opera has neglected FreeBSD users = = for some time already. Well... I'm here to fix that. First off, have the issues with the browser been posted to the FreeBSD = forum (http://my.opera.com/community/forums/forum.dml?id=3D3) in the Ope= ra = Community Forums? We actively monitor and reply to these forums. This = should be the place to go for Opera support on FreeBSD. What are the primary issues with the browser on FreeBSD? We would like t= o = fix all of the problems, of course, but we need to prioritize them = accordingly. We need your help. Daniel -- = Daniel Goldman Technical Evangelist at Opera Software Mobile: +1 443 622 9026 Blog: http://operawatch.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 19:46:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB6C16A40F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:46:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746A543D45 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:46:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kAKJkNGY013970; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:46:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Message-ID: <4562060D.8060608@vidican.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:46:21 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Goldman References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The Opera browser on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:46:25 -0000 Daniel Goldman wrote: > I was just made aware of the recent discussion here about Opera and > FreeBSD. Some of you pointed out that Opera has neglected FreeBSD > users for some time already. Well... I'm here to fix that. > > First off, have the issues with the browser been posted to the FreeBSD > forum (http://my.opera.com/community/forums/forum.dml?id=3) in the > Opera Community Forums? We actively monitor and reply to these forums. > This should be the place to go for Opera support on FreeBSD. > > What are the primary issues with the browser on FreeBSD? We would like > to fix all of the problems, of course, but we need to prioritize them > accordingly. We need your help. > > Daniel > > --Daniel Goldman > Technical Evangelist at Opera Software > Mobile: +1 443 622 9026 > Blog: http://operawatch.com > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > #1 issue afaik - support for FreeBSD/amd64, (my platform of choice). - Currently using Firfox and/or Konquerer. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 20:23:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BC516A415 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DA643D78 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:23:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so2092291nfc for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:23:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FDowXVSTiSUbtYhrOhwaqHpJxCSMwVU9FyDEf+uE8Fer73XbhY/fzIaOmJZr/em2ZHPW8IbMhyCnT/Ou5rwReUh5PU2LXCYGPfgtgMpLj3dGh2HXqy6Zu9OtRIZb6GSQ/WWH9NT2YW4fMcSnCE+AQGFRyxUtTJlSY/CzwHe/Ml0= Received: by 10.82.118.2 with SMTP id q2mr726927buc.1164054223122; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:23:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.175.1 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:23:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:23:42 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: lol In-Reply-To: <000501c70ccd$bb0849a0$0300a8c0@home1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <000501c70ccd$bb0849a0$0300a8c0@home1> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:23:46 -0000 On 11/20/06, lol wrote: > can I put 2 devices onto one usb plug. > > I'd like to solder an internal card reader and a usb socket onto one usb plug so that I can plug it in to the internal usb socket on the usb card,is this possible? > > Many thanks for your help > > Lol I lost my virginity while thinking about something just like that. Be careful out there. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 20:39:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA27816A407 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E863043D67 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:38:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1112998uge for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:39:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=qLmJxyFokV2NVYLsxDUSJzOGnBKmhp9KXWhRaByP4RnSzxJAjp2hAKShiAJWAL1ps6Hl4PQyV+glBgjlOgDIouKS0R+rblk+ssNQX/JO24x6Q21qm7nJcP7fLH1QAli9Nyun3HGjyirk/1gfJyaej9+aG1+m9yW553JNKOMErEI= Received: by 10.67.22.7 with SMTP id z7mr2446121ugi.1164055142361; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:39:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.237.14 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:39:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <755cb9fc0611201239y4b4709c5xf57c4e3a378735e1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:39:02 +0000 From: "Alexandre Vieira" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Local disk Freebsd installation after net boot on Sun Netra T! 105 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:39:09 -0000 Hi lists, I've been reading the manuals for the sparc64 installations but i'm kind of stuck. I have a Netra T1 105 booting from the network just fine but it seems that something is missing from the manuals i've been reading. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/installation-sparc64.html I have two local disks and would like to install freebsd and boot from this disk. Is there any document that covers this is a readable way? # uname -a FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 #0: Fri Nov 17 02:52:51 UTC 2006 root@s-dallas.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC sparc64 # df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on 10.16.3.34:/cdrom/freebsd_install/s0 497580 497580 0 100% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/md1 31470 130 28824 0% /var /dev/md2 19566 12 17990 0% /tmp You can fetch the dmesg here: http://nullpt.googlepages.com/netrat1.txt TIA!! -- Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 20:52:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE57016A407 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from home@clef.at) Received: from stud3.tuwien.ac.at (stud3.tuwien.ac.at [193.170.75.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C1543D69 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:51:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from home@clef.at) Received: from bluedaemon.clef.test (v209-200.vps.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.209.200]) by stud3.tuwien.ac.at (8.9.3 (PHNE_29774)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA02070; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:52:14 +0100 (MET) To: "Anna Rajsman" References: From: Harald Muehlboeck Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:56:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Anna Rajsman's message of "Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:16:13 +0100") Message-ID: <86zmal4z1o.fsf@tuha.clef.at> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opera and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:52:17 -0000 "Anna Rajsman" writes: > We would like to ask you if you would like to distribute the > Opera browser with your OS? Or maybe you are doing it already? Opera is part of the FreeBSD Ports-Collection: The Maintainer of this Port, Arjan van Leeuwen, seems to work for Opera Software. Please see: Perhaps you should contact Arjan van Leeuwen first. > Would you like to sign a distribution agreement with Opera? I think the FreeBSD Foundation handles such legal stuff. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 21:25:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E50516A416 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9CC43D73 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GmGdm-0003o3-2V for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:25:22 +0000 Received: from esperance.zetnet.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with SMTP id kAKLPK9E031049 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:25:21 GMT Received: (qmail 73588 invoked by uid 1001); 20 Nov 2006 21:25:15 -0000 From: "Frank Shute" Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:25:15 +0000 To: "Ne'Bahn" Message-ID: <20061120212515.GA73464@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <000a01c70cb0$396694f0$1033a8c0@bloodlust> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000a01c70cb0$396694f0$1033a8c0@bloodlust> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 i386 X-Organisation: 'Esperance Linux' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:25:22 +0000 (GMT) Cc: UNIX - Questions Subject: Re: Display settings question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:25:24 -0000 On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 09:25:31AM -0500, Ne'Bahn wrote: > > Hi list, I've searched for my display (Hewlett Packard 7500) settings, > specifically for Horizontal / Vertical refresh that are the values used in > the X.Org configuration; no exact matching founded because all docs refers > to Synchronization (Vertical and Horizontal) expressed in Herz too, so I > must assume these values are Horizontal / Vertical refresh or are the > refresh rates that comes together with every one resolution supported, e.g.: > > Display Resolutions Refresh Rates > 640 x 480 60 Hz > 640 x 480 75 Hz > 640 x 480 85 Hz > 720 x 400 70 Hz > 800 x 600 75 Hz > 800 x 600 85 Hz > 1024 x 768 75 Hz > 1024 x 768 85 Hz (preferred user resolution) > 1280 x 1024 60 Hz (maximum resolution) > > Synchronization (Horizontal) > 30 to 70 KHz > > Synchronization (Vertical) > 50 to 140 Hz > > > If it possible to specify wich range of values to use in this case with this > info. > > > Thanks in advance. > Assuming the values you quoted are correct, something like this should work in xorg.conf: Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "HP" ModelName "7500" Option "DPMS" HorizSync 30-70 VertRefresh 50-140 EndSection and then further down: Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultColorDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1024x768" "1280x1024" ViewPort 0 0 EndSubSection EndSection It should be able to run at that ColorDepth assuming a reasonable graphics card (or onboard graphics). I think 1024x768 is more than enough for a 17" monitor. 1280x1024 is more suited to a 19". Disclaimer: The above shouldn't blow up your machine/monitor but it might do and I can't be held responsible if it does...I'm just some idiot on a mailing list ;) -- Frank echo "f r a n k @ e s p e r a n c e - l i n u x . c o . u k" | sed 's/ //g' --->PGP keyID: 0x10BD6F4B<--- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 21:41:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E76916A407; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:41:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D94B43D45; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:41:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kAKLfttt016728; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:41:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Message-ID: <45622121.10409@vidican.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:41:53 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Broadcom BCM4318 / HP Pavilion dv8000 via ndiswrapper not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:41:57 -0000 : uname -a: FreeBSD nv-laptop.wmptl.net 6.2-RC1 FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 #0: Fri Nov 17 10:46:22 EST 2006 root@nv-laptop.wmptl.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/nv1 amd64 Ok, so I have the Windows 64-bit driver files for my card, I ran ndisgen, without any errors and produced 'bcmwl564_sys.ko'. I place the file in /boot/modules, and can load it just fine using kldload. No errors, but also no output whatsoever into dmesg nor on the console. I set the module to load at bootup, (even though it as of yet doesn't work), and when I reboot kldstat produces: nv-laptop# kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 16 0xffffffff80100000 6071c8 kernel 2 1 0xffffffff80708000 886e8 bcmwl564_sys.ko 3 3 0xffffffff80791000 25fe0 ndis.ko 4 2 0xffffffff807b7000 10510 if_ndis.ko 5 1 0xffffffffa7813000 1059 daemon_saver.ko 6 1 0xffffffffa788d000 1d175 radeon.ko 7 1 0xffffffffa78ab000 d7d7 drm.ko So, it took the module, it's loaded, but the card isn't detected... the card is a Broadcom BCM4318, and it is reported from pciconf -lv as below: none3@pci6:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x1358103c chip=0x431914e4 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' class = network I suspect the issue to have something to do with the wireless on/off button located under the center of the screen. This button (afaik) enables/disabled the wireless and bluetooth interface from within windows. With the bluetooth interface enabled, I get debug messages sent through dmesg regarding ugen on/off. With the bluetooth interface disabled (from the bios), pressing the button (apparently) does nothing under FreeBSD. Again, I suspect that this button somehow ties into power management via ACPI to turn on/off the wireless card, but I lack the experience to further diagnose/prove the issue. : How do I probe, list, or otherwise display the possible ACPI 'devices' (ie buttons) ? I've been somewhere before where I could see the buttons on a filesystem-like device, but cannot remember how to get back there. More importantly, how do I see the status or availability of the button for wireless on/off? Can I run a debugger on the ndis-generated kernel module and watch or otherwise step through it's code? - Even if this requires recompiling with support for gdb, could this not shed some light as to weathermy problem is related to an incorrect driver, or to binding the driver to a device? Is there a more appropriate list where I should post these comments to, perhaps somewhere to get in touch with someone developing/working on the ndis-wrapper stuff? I am by no means a kernel hacker yet, and have a lot to learn as far as debugging code and/or working with gcc and associated tools... but I am familiar with code; a programmer by trade just new to the world of gcc and kind of green with the tools therein associated. However, I am willing and wanting to help if I can and in any way I can. I have been googling the heck out of this and have found far more questions than answers from others having problems with the same card... so rather than add to the whining, I'd love to help fix things for everyone - just point me where to go/read/do next if you will :) -- Nathan Vidican nathan@vidican.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 22:35:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA3F16A47B for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6E343D7D for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:34:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GmHj1-0006jc-BA; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:34:51 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAKMbnRb086025; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:37:49 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kAKMbnPd086024; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:37:49 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Nathan Vidican Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:37:48 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <45622121.10409@vidican.com> In-Reply-To: <45622121.10409@vidican.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611201637.49374.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec796d1713bd4b7d3107134d1ebd68b706ee350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Cc: Subject: Re: Broadcom BCM4318 / HP Pavilion dv8000 via ndiswrapper not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:35:02 -0000 On Monday 20 November 2006 15:41, Nathan Vidican wrote: > : > > uname -a: > FreeBSD nv-laptop.wmptl.net 6.2-RC1 FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 #0: Fri Nov 17 > 10:46:22 EST 2006 > root@nv-laptop.wmptl.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/nv1 amd64 > > Ok, so I have the Windows 64-bit driver files for my card, I ran > ndisgen, without any errors and produced 'bcmwl564_sys.ko'. I place the > file in /boot/modules, and can load it just fine using kldload. No > errors, but also no output whatsoever into dmesg nor on the console. > > I set the module to load at bootup, (even though it as of yet doesn't > work), and when I reboot kldstat produces: > > nv-laptop# kldstat > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 16 0xffffffff80100000 6071c8 kernel > 2 1 0xffffffff80708000 886e8 bcmwl564_sys.ko > 3 3 0xffffffff80791000 25fe0 ndis.ko > 4 2 0xffffffff807b7000 10510 if_ndis.ko > 5 1 0xffffffffa7813000 1059 daemon_saver.ko > 6 1 0xffffffffa788d000 1d175 radeon.ko > 7 1 0xffffffffa78ab000 d7d7 drm.ko > > > So, it took the module, it's loaded, but the card isn't detected... the > card is a Broadcom BCM4318, and it is reported from pciconf -lv as below: > > none3@pci6:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x1358103c chip=0x431914e4 rev=0x02 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > class = network > > I suspect the issue to have something to do with the wireless on/off > button located under the center of the screen. This button (afaik) > enables/disabled the wireless and bluetooth interface from within > windows. With the bluetooth interface enabled, I get debug messages sent > through dmesg regarding ugen on/off. With the bluetooth interface > disabled (from the bios), pressing the button (apparently) does nothing > under FreeBSD. Again, I suspect that this button somehow ties into power > management via ACPI to turn on/off the wireless card, but I lack the > experience to further diagnose/prove the issue. > > > : > > How do I probe, list, or otherwise display the possible ACPI 'devices' > (ie buttons) ? I've been somewhere before where I could see the buttons > on a filesystem-like device, but cannot remember how to get back there. > More importantly, how do I see the status or availability of the button > for wireless on/off? > > Can I run a debugger on the ndis-generated kernel module and watch or > otherwise step through it's code? - Even if this requires recompiling > with support for gdb, could this not shed some light as to weathermy > problem is related to an incorrect driver, or to binding the driver to a > device? > > Is there a more appropriate list where I should post these comments to, > perhaps somewhere to get in touch with someone developing/working on the > ndis-wrapper stuff? > > I am by no means a kernel hacker yet, and have a lot to learn as far as > debugging code and/or working with gcc and associated tools... but I am > familiar with code; a programmer by trade just new to the world of gcc > and kind of green with the tools therein associated. However, I am > willing and wanting to help if I can and in any way I can. I have been > googling the heck out of this and have found far more questions than > answers from others having problems with the same card... so rather than > add to the whining, I'd love to help fix things for everyone - just > point me where to go/read/do next if you will :) > > -- > Nathan Vidican > nathan@vidican.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Nathan, I've got a similar card on my laptop, which pciconf only knows as vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' class = network It works properly in windows with the shipped drivers, but I've yet to get it to work in FreeBSD 6.1. A couple of folks have suggested using various drivers, downloadable from the DELL site, and have even given me specific filenames to download. However, no combination of drivers and "ndisgen" seems to yield a workable kernel module for me, and I've never been able to have "ifconfig -a" report the ndis0 interface (although it does see something called fwi0). Frankly I gave up on it. If you come up with a solution, by all means please share it with the list. While wireless ain't exactly "cutting edge," knowledge about it seems to be much more diffuse than with other features of FreeBSD - or perhaps the technology is much more hardware-specific than with other pieces of equipment ... lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 22:51:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E11116A407 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CA143D80 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:50:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2006 17:50:31 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MNY93768; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:50:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2006 17:50:29 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,440,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="315731736:sNHT26025202" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17762.12397.182517.766217@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:47:09 -0500 To: "Daniel Goldman" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090207.45623076.00B3,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.121/2006-09-27 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: The Opera browser on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:51:11 -0000 Daniel Goldman writes: > What are the primary issues with the browser on FreeBSD? We would > like to fix all of the problems, of course, but we need to > prioritize them accordingly. We need your help. huff@jerusalem>> uname -sr FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT huff@jerusalem>> dir /usr/X11R6/bin/opera -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5024 Sep 25 10:29 /usr/X11R6/bin/opera huff@jerusalem>> ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/opera ldd: /usr/X11R6/bin/opera: not a dynamic executable huff@jerusalem>> opera -v Bad system call (core dumped) Where do I send the core file? :-) Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 23:13:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63BA16A412 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plathrop@squaretrade.com) Received: from mail.squaretrade.com (mail.squaretrade.com [64.56.206.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF6F43D5A for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:12:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from plathrop@squaretrade.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.squaretrade.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FAA27A4C31; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:13:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at squaretrade.com Received: from mail.squaretrade.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (knockout.prod.squaretrade.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id y+pj5CIM4OK8; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:13:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.219.1] (unknown [192.168.219.1]) by mail.squaretrade.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADBA27A4C2C; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:13:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45623692.7040308@squaretrade.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:13:22 -0800 From: Paul Lathrop Organization: SquareTrade, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FTP_PASSIVE_MODE stumper X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:13:10 -0000 I've been banging my head against this for 2 hours. My network lives behind an OpenBSD firewall which uses ftp-proxy to allow active mode FTP connections out to the world. Unfortunately, passive mode FTP just does not work in our current firewall configuration. I'm trying to install some ports on my shiny new FreeBSD 6.1 server. Unfortunately, the fetch operations time out because they are attempting to use passive mode FTP. So, I consult the man pages and discover that fetch obeys the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE environment variable. I check the environment and see that FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES! Excellent! The fetch(3) man page says I need to set this to 'no', so I do so and procedd to install... Still times out. Hrm. Okay, try 'NO'. No dice. Try removing it from login.conf, running cap_mkdb, and logging out then back in. Nope, that still doesn't do it. Try *changing* it to NO in login.conf, running cap_mkdb, logging out and back in. Nope. Set it by hand in the shell. Nope. Set it in /etc/make.conf. Still not working. The only conclusion I can come to is that fetch does not, in fact, obey this environment variable. So, how does one install software from ports in this environment? Any pointers would be much appreciated. Regards, Paul Lathrop From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 23:17:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6487116A415 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:17:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoenix.lists@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD1943D69 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:16:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phoenix.lists@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so2137301nfc for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:17:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:face:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oF7ou5WyPw7h2SNemDO5RAaSXeJPCO9hHVMVV6I/vLfMooDfZnMXHfGB3E7xFPHBVjszB6pMb/V7QwVuZJI8VQuEowMi20sUVV2/Y+tg7KyjfHdPWZKwAY6nUF27nrbUgBFukYaLB4CJ41WrDDGqOZh9oqV/oL6zav537em162k= Received: by 10.48.242.19 with SMTP id p19mr68186nfh.1164064629840; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:17:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.67.7? ( [85.202.143.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l32sm23700991nfa.2006.11.20.15.17.08; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:17:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4562376B.5080402@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:16:59 +0200 From: Simon Phoenix Organization: Phoenix Lab. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061118) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark References: <200611121831.kACIVDUU071930@asarian-host.net> In-Reply-To: <200611121831.kACIVDUU071930@asarian-host.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=2569D30B; url=http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/export?id=-8883115982484548853&created=1138842246000 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oUlEQVQY043QsQ2DMBCF4RdRpPQIbBIPlQFcZgxGsaUUlDcCdCkJosES8cXPFkJKFCk0n2z/dwXQ 8uGDWYUsBz7zEO0wLk2AwYgTyXVJdCAv7UlynahDsj7AZqyghV6ukiw0zSQAjidVXxkKEwcieiYr Gi6L3OkKiYgwUQl5Z4QwWWFqKXuyHQkH6tsfpU4/eJq73hA3M+KcL9u1DPivX/cGp2DdNlc2XdMA AAAASUVORK5CYII= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: APC SMART-UPS 750 VA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:17:24 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Mark said the following on 12.11.2006 20:31: > Hello, > > Could someone tell me whether I can use the APC SMART-UPS 750 VA for my > FreeBSD 4.11 installation? (yes, I know, I still use 4.11). I have an APC > 350 (not "smart"), but it doesn't really work well with apcupsd (seems to > ignore shutdown time). So, maybe it's time for a "smart" device. Should > preferably run over serial cable. I have ugen1: American Power Conversion Back-UPS BR 800 FW:9.o2 .I USB FW:o2, rev 1.10/1.06, addr 2 apcupsd works fine with this model. You can try also /usr/ports/sysutils/nut Good Luck! - -- Best regards, Simon Phoenix (Phoenix Lab.) - --------------------------------------------------------------- KeyID: 0x2569D30B Fingerprint: 78FC 5C40 07CC D331 148E CC79 84B8 D514 2569 D30B - --------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFYjdmhLjVFCVp0wsRCoz/AKCAOX4b2CgJ8BbkjYkUC1nY7oCOegCePA1F 3XoskOqU5YvnKsxfTdVU5LA= =sgFH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 23:23:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6278F16A47E for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4C543D81 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:22:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64FE1A3C19; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:22:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EF9A45424D; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:22:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:22:27 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Paul Lathrop Message-ID: <20061120232227.GA50543@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <45623692.7040308@squaretrade.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45623692.7040308@squaretrade.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP_PASSIVE_MODE stumper X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:23:43 -0000 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 03:13:22PM -0800, Paul Lathrop wrote: > I've been banging my head against this for 2 hours. >=20 > My network lives behind an OpenBSD firewall which uses ftp-proxy to=20 > allow active mode FTP connections out to the world. Unfortunately,=20 > passive mode FTP just does not work in our current firewall configuration. >=20 > I'm trying to install some ports on my shiny new FreeBSD 6.1 server.=20 > Unfortunately, the fetch operations time out because they are attempting= =20 > to use passive mode FTP. So, I consult the man pages and discover that=20 > fetch obeys the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE environment variable. I check the=20 > environment and see that FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=3DYES! Excellent! The fetch(3)= =20 > man page says I need to set this to 'no', so I do so and procedd to=20 > install... >=20 > Still times out. >=20 > Hrm. Okay, try 'NO'. No dice. Try removing it from login.conf, running=20 > cap_mkdb, and logging out then back in. Nope, that still doesn't do it.= =20 > Try *changing* it to NO in login.conf, running cap_mkdb, logging out and= =20 > back in. Nope. >=20 > Set it by hand in the shell. Nope. >=20 > Set it in /etc/make.conf. Still not working. >=20 > The only conclusion I can come to is that fetch does not, in fact, obey= =20 > this environment variable. No, it's being requested explicitly by bsd.port.mk in the fetch command line to deal with certain configurations that do not set the env variable. > So, how does one install software from ports in this environment? Override the FETCH_CMD variable in /etc/make.conf, see bsd.port.mk. Kris --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFYjizWry0BWjoQKURAkO0AKDzrPcFnJHrp0FLM/I2NyrVej2B3wCeO/eP STsvBdwML03e1+eItK9eVKY= =RAAq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 23:30:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F3E16A4FD for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plathrop@squaretrade.com) Received: from mail.squaretrade.com (mail.squaretrade.com [64.56.206.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66AC43D95 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:28:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from plathrop@squaretrade.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.squaretrade.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5481327A4C31; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:28:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at squaretrade.com Received: from mail.squaretrade.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (knockout.prod.squaretrade.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2WaItFC2AE9Y; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:28:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.219.1] (unknown [192.168.219.1]) by mail.squaretrade.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE83327A4C30; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:28:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45623A3B.8020509@squaretrade.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:28:59 -0800 From: Paul Lathrop Organization: SquareTrade, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <45623692.7040308@squaretrade.com> <20061120232227.GA50543@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20061120232227.GA50543@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP_PASSIVE_MODE stumper X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:30:41 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > No, it's being requested explicitly by bsd.port.mk in the fetch > command line to deal with certain configurations that do not set the > env variable. > >> So, how does one install software from ports in this environment? > > Override the FETCH_CMD variable in /etc/make.conf, see bsd.port.mk. Kris, You're a life saver. Thank you. --Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 20 23:32:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBFE16A5AC for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ggroth@gregs-garage.com) Received: from mail.gregs-garage.com (h-64-105-8-34.chcgilgm.covad.net [64.105.8.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5044843D64 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:30:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggroth@gregs-garage.com) Received: from [192.168.0.150] ([192.168.0.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.gregs-garage.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAKNNOOT078959 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:23:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ggroth@gregs-garage.com) Message-ID: <456238DE.3010902@gregs-garage.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:23:10 -0600 From: Greg Groth User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45623692.7040308@squaretrade.com> In-Reply-To: <45623692.7040308@squaretrade.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on mail.gregs-garage.com Subject: Re: FTP_PASSIVE_MODE stumper X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:32:49 -0000 Paul Lathrop wrote: > I've been banging my head against this for 2 hours. > > My network lives behind an OpenBSD firewall which uses ftp-proxy to > allow active mode FTP connections out to the world. Unfortunately, > passive mode FTP just does not work in our current firewall configuration. > > I'm trying to install some ports on my shiny new FreeBSD 6.1 server. > Unfortunately, the fetch operations time out because they are attempting > to use passive mode FTP. So, I consult the man pages and discover that > fetch obeys the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE environment variable. I check the > environment and see that FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES! Excellent! The fetch(3) > man page says I need to set this to 'no', so I do so and procedd to > install... > > Still times out. > > Hrm. Okay, try 'NO'. No dice. Try removing it from login.conf, running > cap_mkdb, and logging out then back in. Nope, that still doesn't do it. > Try *changing* it to NO in login.conf, running cap_mkdb, logging out and > back in. Nope. > > Set it by hand in the shell. Nope. > > Set it in /etc/make.conf. Still not working. > > The only conclusion I can come to is that fetch does not, in fact, obey > this environment variable. > > So, how does one install software from ports in this environment? > > Any pointers would be much appreciated. > > Regards, > Paul Lathrop Sorry, I don't have an answer. I just wanted to chime in and state that I have the same issue behind a pfsense firewall. I have an environment at home in which I have a single IP address and use port forwarding for my one server, and have no issues. However at work, I have 3 sitting behind a pfsense firewall using CARP for address translation, and fetch in passive mode will not work. I end up having to use an FTP client, and SCPing the files to the server, and then moving them to /usr/ports/distfiles. Any help would be much appreciated. Greg Groth From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 00:26:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C5916A407 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@hiwaay.net) Received: from bee.hiwaay.net (bee.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE1743D45 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:26:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@hiwaay.net) Received: from [10.0.0.2] ([216.186.148.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by bee.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAL0QHxs1060216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:26:18 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <005f01c70c1a$4382d840$c6ed86d9@COMPAQ> References: <20061119045438.9275F16A580@hub.freebsd.org> <005f01c70c1a$4382d840$c6ed86d9@COMPAQ> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4441A371-BE7C-454C-BDD3-23425A1088D8@hiwaay.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Kelly Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:26:22 -0600 To: Keith McKenzie X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: link_elf_lookup_symbol:missing symbol hash table X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:26:21 -0000 On Nov 19, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Keith McKenzie wrote: >> The most unusual thing about my system configuration would be / >> boot/ loader.conf: >> >> geom_vinum_load=YES >> >> # either load these here or statically compile into the kernel: >> # 3/17/2006 dmk >> #wlan_wep_load="YES" # used by WEP >> #wlan_tkip_load="YES" # used by WPA >> wlan_ccmp_load="YES" # used by WPA2 >> wlan_xauth_load="YES" >> #wlan_acl_load="YES" >> >> snd_ich_load=YES >> hw.ata.atapi_dma=1 >> kern.maxdsiz="2G" >> kern.dfldsiz="2G" >> #hw.physmem="2G" # saying this broke things wonderfully, altho true >> kern.maxssiz="128M" >> nvidia_load="YES" >> linux_load="YES" > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Hello David, > > I notice you don't have:- > > sound_load="YES" > > in your loader.conf file ! > > Could that be causing the missing hash table message ? A worthy guess, however if one loads a module which depends on another the dependency is brought in as well. With the above loader.conf below is the result. Notice sound.ko is loaded altho it was never specified: # kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 18 0xc0400000 44c9ec kernel 2 1 0xc084d000 11920 geom_vinum.ko 3 2 0xc085f000 1adb8 linux.ko 4 1 0xc087a000 5f60 snd_ich.ko 5 2 0xc0880000 22b88 sound.ko 6 1 0xc08a3000 6da4 wlan_ccmp.ko 7 1 0xc08aa000 1b88 wlan_xauth.ko 8 1 0xc08ac000 45923c nvidia.ko 9 1 0xc0d06000 59f20 acpi.ko 10 1 0xc6e71000 2000 green_saver.ko 11 1 0xc6ea8000 2000 rtc.ko # Rehashing the problem, "link_elf_lookup_symbol:missing symbol hash table" appears as practically one of the first console messages during boot, and often reappears in dmesg and /var/log/messages while the system is running. And come to think of it this one appears much less frequently: hints file version mismatch 790634787 Searching for others with this problem, others have suggested: # cp /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC.hints /boot/device.hints But diff says both files are identical. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 00:27:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AC416A412 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:27:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0AB43D55 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:27:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:27:30 +0800 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:27:29 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:27:29 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Xircom XE2000 card problem thread-index: AccMlQslhECD65ibT2y1y8VXh4psKwAbooOg Importance: normal Priority: normal From: "Wood, Russell" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2006 00:27:29.0697 (UTC) FILETIME=[D40C0910:01C70D03] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:27:40 -0000 > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem >From: "Wood, Russell" >Date: Sun, November 19, 2006 6:13 pm >To: , > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- >> questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of jvk-list@thekrafts.org >> Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 12:08 AM >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Xircom XE2000 card problem >>=20 >>=20 >> Asked this question a couple of days ago in freebsd-mobile, but >> haven't heard anything. I'm reposting here to, hopefully, a wider >> audience... >>=20 >> I have an Inspiron 7000 laptop I've set up as a FreeBSD server running >> Version 6.1. I have a Xircom XE2000 ethernet card I'd like to = use. >> It appears to be recognized by FreeBSD, but doesn't startup . >> correctly. In searching I've seen references to it working with >> FreeBSD, but indicate it should use the xe driver. >>=20 >> Here's what the dmesg says: >> ed1: at port 0x100-0x10f iomem >> 0x88000000-0x88000fff irq 1 >> 1 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 >> device_attach: ed1 attach returned 6 >>=20 >> Looking at the hardware list it should be supported by the dc or = xe >> drivers, but not the ed driver. Am I missing something easy, or = is >> this card not reallyl supported at all? >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Joe. > >If you have a closer look, it is using the ed (4): > >ed1: at port 0x100-0x10f iomem > >Make sure you have the following devices compiled in your kernel: > >device miibus >device ed > >... also, you might need: > >device pccard >device cardbus > >Regards, >Russell Wood >I did see that it was using the ed(4) driver. I'm using the GENERIC = kernel which contains pccard, cardbus, >miibus, and ed drivers. I was = wondering if that was the correct driver or if it was being detected = >incorrectly. =20 =20 >I don't see anything in the ed(4) man page about supporting any Xircom = products. Most of the Xircom cards >seem to be supported by the xe = driver, and this bug report = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd->bugs/2005-August/014396.html = seems to support that theory. Also, searching through the ed(4) code = doesn't >generate eny references to any Xircom products. =20 >It just seems to me that it should be using the xe(4) driver not the = ed(4) driver. =20 >Is there a way to try and force it to the xe driver to see if it will = work? =20 >Thanks for your time, >Joe. =20 Try: kldunload if_ed kldload if_xe ... and see if it detects to card. Regards, Russell Wood DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 01:43:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F6616A403 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:43:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0561043D46 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:43:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAL1hgDp077215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:43:42 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <456259CB.1060002@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:43:39 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Dynamic Hostname Assignment With dhcpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:43:50 -0000 I am running isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.4_1 on a FBSD 4.11-stable machine. I have defined a pool of addresses to be used for dhcp address assignment and configured them correctly in DNS. Forwards and reverses resolve properly. All this seems to work just fine. You can plug a host into the network and it will be properly configured for everything *except* the hostname. (At the moment, I am limiting myself to a FBSD 6.1 (PC-BSD) machine for testing, but the issue is known to exist on WinXP and other Unices as well.) After digging around for a couple of hours, I still cannot seem to find the necessary magic. So ... Just how do I get a dhcp configured client to pickup the proper hostname (so that reverses will work properly)? I removed the "hostname=..." statement from /etc/rc.conf and rebooted the client. When I look at the kernel environment (with 'kenv') I see no values beginning with "dhcp...". Do I need to do something in the server configuration? Here is the configuration at the moment: ddns-update-style ad-hoc; option domain-name "foo.com"; option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.22; option routers 192.168.0.1; subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.140 192.168.0.159; } TIA, ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 02:27:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35C716A412 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C361343D5A for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:27:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-66-140-63-124.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [66.140.63.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846B3114307 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:23:38 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:26:59 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: UNIX - Questions Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7b1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========139C45953D53D4F7084E==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Totally stumped - very long post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:27:26 -0000 --==========139C45953D53D4F7084E========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I have a problem the likes of which I've never seen before, and I'm=20 totally stumped. For some reason, I cannot load this webpage -=20 http://www.stovebolt.com/ - from my Mac at home. I'm not having trouble=20 with any other page except this one (that I know of.) Even weirder, I=20 can't ssh to this server either. The server is a Dell 1950 running an=20 Intel processor, FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE and a GENERIC kernel. - FreeBSD=20 www.stovebolt.com 6.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 #2: Mon Oct 16=20 15:38:02 CDT 2006 root@www.stovebolt.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC=20 i386 I can load this page just fine - https://webmail.stovebolt.com/ - and I=20 can ssh to that server with no problem. The IPs are *one* address away -=20 66.221.101.248 in the former case and 66.221.101.249 in the latter case.=20 What's more, if I ssh to the latter, I can ssh *from that server* to the=20 former with no problem at all. Yet, from work, I'm having no problems loading the webpage or sshing to=20 the former server. I can start an X session from my work computer back to = this Mac and load the page fine and ssh to the server fine at the *exact*=20 same time that I can't load the page here. (I'm doing it right now.) I've done tons of traceroutes from numerous servers listed at=20 geektools.com. I've sshed to other servers and then telneted to port 80=20 and loaded the page manually with no problem. I've tried loading the page = in two different browsers at home (Safari and Firefox) and I've tried=20 loading it using the IP thinking it might be some sort of weird DNS=20 problem. All attempts to load the page fail. Here's a traceroute from the server to my workstation at work: traceroute utd59514.utdallas.edu traceroute to utd59514.utdallas.edu (129.110.3.28), 64 hops max, 40 byte=20 packets 1 vl25-core1.cdc01.propgation.net (66.221.96.1) 1.019 ms 45.813 ms=20 2.510 ms 2 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.76.17) 31.179 ms 30.894 ms 31.027 = ms 3 ge-6-14.car4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.111.233) 2.800 ms 2.186 ms=20 1.743 ms 4 ae-12-53.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.78) 2.066 ms ae-22-52.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.46) 2.139 ms ae-22-56.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.174) 2.308 ms 5 te-4-4.wch010.dllstx2.Level3.net (4.68.110.10) 2.945 ms te-7-4.wch010.dllstx2.Level3.net (4.68.110.14) 2.689 ms te-4-4.wch010.dllstx2.Level3.net (4.68.110.10) 2.215 ms 6 dllstx2wcx2-univ-of-texas-5-0-0.wcg.net (64.200.204.38) 2.948 ms=20 3.040 ms 2.644 ms 7 utd-ntg-gw1.northtexasgigapop.org (206.223.141.74) 2.879 ms 2.763 ms = 2.870 ms 8 deputy2-ge-2-0-0.utdallas.edu (129.110.5.71) 3.058 ms 3.040 ms=20 2.933 ms And here's a traceroute from getnet to the server: FROM getnet.net TO 66.221.101.248. traceroute to 66.221.101.248 (66.221.101.248), 30 hops max, 40 byte = packets 1 phnx-core-7513.getnet.net (216.19.223.1) 0.589 ms 0.448 ms 0.595=20 ms 2 phnx-core-7513.getnet.net (216.19.201.247) 0.662 ms 0.483 ms=20 0.595 ms 3 phnx-core2-7513.getnet.net (216.19.201.248) 74.589 ms 73.800 ms=20 73.578 ms 4 s1-0.ca01.phx01.atlas.cogentco.com (38.112.7.25) 1.353 ms 1.316 ms=20 1.485 ms 5 s2-0.core02.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.5) 12.704 ms 12.419=20 ms 13.535 ms 6 p12-0.core01.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.241) 13.777 ms=20 13.538 ms 12.872 ms 7 t9-3.mpd01.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.1.34) 13.677 ms 13.171=20 ms 13.496 ms 8 t3-2.mpd01.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.6.190) 12.807 ms 12.628 = ms 13.909 ms 9 g0-0-0.core01.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.6.185) 15.261 ms=20 15.100 ms 15.394 ms 10 bpr4-ge-6-1-0.losangelesequinix.savvis.net (208.174.196.105) 16.789=20 ms 19.255 ms 21.610 ms 11 dcr2-so-4-2-0.losangeles.savvis.net (208.174.196.70) 22.094 ms=20 27.473 ms 20.118 ms 12 dcr1-so-2-0-0.dallas.savvis.net (204.70.192.85) 43.248 ms=20 dcr1-as0-0.LosAngeles.savvis.net (204.70.192.117) 18.751 ms 18.014 ms 13 dcr2-so-3-3-0.dallas.savvis.net (204.70.192.246) 41.089 ms 40.079=20 ms bcr1-so-0-0-0.Dallas.savvis.net (204.70.193.9) 39.066 ms 14 208.172.130.130 (208.172.130.130) 39.433 ms=20 bcr1-so-1-0-0.Dallas.savvis.net (204.70.193.17) 39.721 ms 40.575 ms 15 gi1-1-core1.cdc01.propgation.net (64.182.192.5) 65.455 ms 64.214 ms = 53.565 ms 16 www.stovebolt.com (66.221.101.248) 41.602 ms=20 5-192-182-64.cust.propagation.net (64.182.192.5) 60.961 ms 61.391 ms Now here's a traceroute from the server to my Mac at home (actually to the = IP of the dsl router: traceroute 66.140.63.124 traceroute to 66.140.63.124 (66.140.63.124), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 * * * traceroute: sendto: Host is down 2 traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=3D-1 *traceroute: sendto: Host is down traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=3D-1 (Trust me, the host isn't down. I'm doing this on it right now.) Here's a traceroute from socket.com to my Mac: traceroute to adsl-66-140-63-124.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net (66.140.63.124), 30 = hops max, 40 byte packets 1 fw1.como.socket.net (216.106.88.148) 0.647 ms 0.809 ms 0.503 ms 2 rtr1.como.socket.net (216.106.2.1) 1.113 ms 1.141 ms 1.072 ms 3 hdlc.kcmo-como.socket.net (216.106.23.70) 5.751 ms 4.144 ms 3.561 = ms 4 atm1-gw2.kcmo.socket.net (216.106.6.94) 4.433 ms 4.783 ms 4.377 ms 5 67.17.194.229 (67.17.194.229) 4.393 ms 4.715 ms 4.427 ms 6 * And here's one from mit to my Mac: 1 W92-RTR-1-W92SRV21.MIT.EDU (18.7.21.1) 0.521 ms 0.342 ms 0.470 ms 2 EXTERNAL-RTR-2-BACKBONE.MIT.EDU (18.168.0.27) 123.856 ms 1.084 ms=20 14.171 ms 3 EXTERNAL-RTR-1-BACKBONE.MIT.EDU (18.168.0.18) 2.092 ms 1.869 ms=20 1.633 ms 4 ge-6-23.car2.Boston1.Level3.net (4.79.2.1) 2.089 ms 1.069 ms 1.491=20 ms 5 * * ae-5-5.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.132.250) 8.040 ms 6 ae-3.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.132.89) 21.894 ms * * 7 ae-14-51.car4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.68.121.17) 11.715 ms=20 ae-14-53.car4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.68.121.81) 55.824 ms=20 ae-14-55.car4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.68.121.145) 11.797 ms 8 asn3356-level3.eqabva.sbcglobal.net (4.68.111.186) 33.169 ms 11.193=20 ms 11.448 ms 9 bb1-p2-1.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net (151.164.42.179) 198.474 ms 90.350 ms=20 260.199 ms 10 dist1.10g1-2.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net (151.164.243.182) 56.167 ms 58.665 = ms 58.920 ms 11 bras1-ga9-0.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net (151.164.162.87) 60.344 ms 59.367=20 ms 58.268 ms 12 * * * 13 * * * Top on this server looks fine: last pid: 80367; load averages: 0.15,=20 0.12, 0.11 up=20 35+04:14:31 19:28:31 78 processes: 1 running, 77 sleeping CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 0.4% interrupt, 98.9%=20 idle Mem: 89M Active, 1445M Inact, 216M Wired, 87M Cache, 112M Buf, 165M Free Swap: 1120K Total, 1120K Free There's plenty of child processes running: root 53132 0.0 0.4 15304=20 9264 ?? Ss Sun06PM 0:02.40 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53133 0.0 0.5 15668 9648 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.15=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53134 0.0 0.5 15536 9548 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.03=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53135 0.0 0.5 15660 9644 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.08=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53136 0.0 0.5 15636 9604 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.00=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53137 0.0 0.5 15572 9572 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.01=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53138 0.0 0.5 15540 9540 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.02=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53139 0.0 0.5 15628 9612 ?? S Sun06PM 0:03.99=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53140 0.0 0.5 15560 9568 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.11=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53141 0.0 0.5 15548 9548 ?? S Sun06PM 0:03.96=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53142 0.0 0.5 15536 9552 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.03=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53143 0.0 0.5 15536 9552 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.02=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53144 0.0 0.5 15628 9600 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.01=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53145 0.0 0.5 15552 9596 ?? S Sun06PM 0:03.97=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53146 0.0 0.5 15648 9644 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.10=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53147 0.0 0.5 15692 9664 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.03=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53157 0.0 0.5 15528 9536 ?? I Sun06PM 0:04.06=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53162 0.0 0.5 15588 9608 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.13=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53163 0.0 0.5 15640 9600 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.03=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53164 0.0 0.5 15624 9608 ?? S Sun06PM 0:03.96=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53166 0.0 0.5 15640 9616 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.20=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53173 0.0 0.5 15548 9560 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.12=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53175 0.0 0.5 15560 9564 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.08=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53176 0.0 0.5 15552 9556 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.25=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53181 0.0 0.5 15552 9592 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.13=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53183 0.0 0.5 15552 9596 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.18=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53184 0.0 0.5 15560 9560 ?? S Sun06PM 0:03.95=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53191 0.0 0.5 15524 9540 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.12=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53195 0.0 0.5 15604 9592 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.04=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53196 0.0 0.5 15576 9616 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.06=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53207 0.0 0.5 15568 9604 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.00=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53208 0.0 0.5 15676 9652 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.17=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53209 0.0 0.5 15636 9612 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.24=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53219 0.0 0.5 15628 9624 ?? S Sun06PM 0:03.94=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53221 0.0 0.5 15624 9620 ?? S Sun06PM 0:03.90=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53222 0.0 0.5 15672 9640 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.07=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53252 0.0 0.5 15640 9616 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.19=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53253 0.0 0.5 15656 9668 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.00=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53254 0.0 0.5 15568 9600 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.04=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53261 0.0 0.5 15648 9620 ?? S Sun06PM 0:04.28=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 53270 0.0 0.5 15576 9588 ?? S Sun06PM 0:03.91=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 76140 0.0 0.5 15524 9524 ?? S 4:47PM 0:00.68=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 79449 0.0 0.5 15548 9540 ?? S 6:50PM 0:00.18=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL www 79453 0.0 0.5 15540 9532 ?? S 6:50PM 0:00.19=20 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL I've only had one complaint from a user who can't seem to access the site, = but I've also noticed that the site stats show a slight decrease from=20 previous weeks (which could easily be upcoming-holiday related.) So I=20 don't know if this is a problem on the server or something weird on this=20 Mac or something strange on the internet. If anyone has any brilliant insights as to what could cause this, please=20 let me know. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========139C45953D53D4F7084E==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 02:38:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2436B16A416 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rickie24@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1541C43D6A for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:38:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rickie24@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1185228uge for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:38:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=cJIt8M8eDKgTvq5mMg6tFP+yW5GPOt64nl2RFsyMPueIwAEz4NvPmYWEjDKU2/pWh+4tRVPLtBJ2R2ioSO9TJEY86o5Km4unD6KDcJHIxPL9fa8D7BcmstfZXwhdykUIBzaVwJ7c1E4U0JfPcjkwX9eTc4xlQXCGp8iLw2+AU9Q= Received: by 10.78.185.15 with SMTP id i15mr1879813huf.1164076706840; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:38:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.174.10 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:38:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:38:26 -0500 From: "rickie lyman" To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: I don't see anything to answer my q X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:38:29 -0000 I am a newbee and sometimes Dizzy too. My question is I have a computer that has a rather large drive but it is all formated in NTFs and yes it has XP Pro on it how would I be able to put Free BSD on there without loosing the files I have with the other operating system?? I told you that I was confused. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 02:41:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED81116A415 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaj13@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de (fmmailgate03.web.de [217.72.192.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75D443D49 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:41:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaj13@web.de) Received: from smtp06.web.de (fmsmtp06.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.172]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605383B36F6D; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:41:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [82.234.154.189] (helo=[82.234.154.189]) by smtp06.web.de with esmtp (WEB.DE 4.107 #114) id 1GmLZg-00074U-00; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:41:28 +0100 Message-ID: <45626758.7060005@web.de> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:41:28 +0100 From: Jona Joachim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: jaj13@web.de X-Sender: jaj13@web.de Cc: UNIX - Questions Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:41:36 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > I have a problem the likes of which I've never seen before, and I'm > totally stumped. For some reason, I cannot load this webpage - > http://www.stovebolt.com/ - from my Mac at home. I'm not having trouble > with any other page except this one (that I know of.) Even weirder, I > can't ssh to this server either. The server is a Dell 1950 running an > Intel processor, FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE and a GENERIC kernel. - FreeBSD > www.stovebolt.com 6.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 #2: Mon Oct 16 > 15:38:02 CDT 2006 > root@www.stovebolt.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > I can load this page just fine - https://webmail.stovebolt.com/ - and I > can ssh to that server with no problem. The IPs are *one* address away > - 66.221.101.248 in the former case and 66.221.101.249 in the latter > case. What's more, if I ssh to the latter, I can ssh *from that server* > to the former with no problem at all. This is just wild guessing but are you sure that there is no firewall that blocks this specific IP address? Best regards, Jona From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 02:44:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B4816A412 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C117243D6E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:44:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAL2hg0E008957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:43:42 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id kAL2idc3016792; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:44:39 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:44:39 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200611210244.kAL2idc3016792@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: rickie24@gmail.com In-reply-to: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> (rickie24@gmail.com) References: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I don't see anything to answer my q X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:44:40 -0000 > I am a newbee and sometimes Dizzy too. My question is I have a computer that > has a rather large drive but it is all formated in NTFs and yes it has XP > Pro on it how would I be able to put Free BSD on there without loosing the > files I have with the other operating system?? I told you that I was > confused. Do you have several partitions on it or a single one? If you have several partitions, remove everything from one of the partitions and use it for FreeBSD. ifyou have a single partition, splitit into 2, using things like partition mahgic. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 02:49:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C2916A416 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from ns.beach.net (ns.beach.net [12.130.64.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA6D43DD7 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:48:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from [192.168.1.228] ([209.137.253.157]) by ns.beach.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kAL2nGaf062645; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:49:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Busarow Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:49:23 -0700 To: Paul Schmehl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: UNIX - Questions Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:49:45 -0000 On Nov 20, 2006, at 7:26 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > Now here's a traceroute from the server to my Mac at home (actually > to the IP of the dsl router: > traceroute 66.140.63.124 > traceroute to 66.140.63.124 (66.140.63.124), 64 hops max, 40 byte > packets > 1 * * * > traceroute: sendto: Host is down > 2 traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=-1 > *traceroute: sendto: Host is down > traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=-1 > > (Trust me, the host isn't down. I'm doing this on it right now.) Well you don't need to worry about it being a problem with your Mac. The traceroute isn't even making one hop. What's your routing table on the server look like? Any ipfw/ipf rules? Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 02:55:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3840C16A407 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FD943D6E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:54:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAL2sDrS009470 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:54:13 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id kAL2tCZB018207; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:55:12 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:55:12 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200611210255.kAL2tCZB018207@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: pauls@utdallas.edu In-reply-to: (message from Paul Schmehl on Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:26:59 -0600) References: X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:55:09 -0000 > Now here's a traceroute from the server to my Mac at home (actually to the = > > IP of the dsl router: > traceroute 66.140.63.124 > traceroute to 66.140.63.124 (66.140.63.124), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets > 1 * * * > traceroute: sendto: Host is down > 2 traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=3D-1 > *traceroute: sendto: Host is down > traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=3D-1 Would be usefull to try to traceroute from your mac to your server: comparing both traceroute helps to see where the route is blocked. A ping in both direction will help too. A traceroute to another IP in 66.140.63/24 network may help. To another IP in 66.140/16. To another IP in 66/8. Traceroute from and to the webmail machine could help too, find the difference, understand why there is difference and then you have your problem located. Then install wireshark (/usr/ports/net/wireshark-lite/) on the server from the ports and see what it says when you are trying to browse the server? Can you see the SYN packet? Does the server send the SYN/ACK packet? Install wireshark on your Mac client and do the same test, does yourclient send the SYN packet? Do you see the SYN/ACK sent bythe server? Desactivate the firewall on both machines. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 03:06:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AB816A407 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaj13@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de (fmmailgate02.web.de [217.72.192.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7268543D49 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:06:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaj13@web.de) Received: from smtp05.web.de (fmsmtp05.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.4.166]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC923A9D22A; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:06:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [82.234.154.189] (helo=[82.234.154.189]) by smtp05.web.de with esmtp (WEB.DE 4.107 #114) id 1GmLxj-0000RQ-00; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:06:19 +0100 Message-ID: <45626D2B.70805@web.de> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:06:19 +0100 From: Jona Joachim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rickie lyman References: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: jaj13@web.de X-Sender: jaj13@web.de Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I don't see anything to answer my q X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:06:21 -0000 rickie lyman wrote: > I am a newbee and sometimes Dizzy too. My question is I have a computer > that > has a rather large drive but it is all formated in NTFs and yes it has XP > Pro on it how would I be able to put Free BSD on there without loosing the > files I have with the other operating system?? I told you that I was > confused. Hi and welcome! How much of a newbie are you? Do you know what partitions, BSD slices and disk labels are and how they work? If you don't know what I'm talking about the easiest and safest is to put a new/unused hard drive into your box and install FreeBSD on it. There are proprietary tools like PartitionMagic that allow you to resize NTFS partitions but I don't know how well they work and how safe they are. *Always* create a backup of your data before using tools like this. I'm not aware of any free program that has advanced support for NTFS. Jona From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 03:09:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4509916A412 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from mtao02.charter.net (mtao02.charter.net [209.225.8.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C6043D49 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:09:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from aa05.charter.net ([10.20.200.157]) by mtao02.charter.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061121030923.YFYW1518.mtao02.charter.net@aa05.charter.net> for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:09:23 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.6] (really [24.159.55.136]) by aa05.charter.net with ESMTP id <20061121030923.QNBB8276.aa05.charter.net@[192.168.1.6]> for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:09:23 -0500 Message-ID: <45626DE3.9040507@wilderness.homeip.net> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:09:23 -0600 From: Laurence Sanford User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061118) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chzlrs: 0 Cc: Subject: firefox build error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:09:29 -0000 Firefox build from ports is exiting with this error: cc -o gtk2xtbin.o -c -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD6\" -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -DBUILD_ID=0000000000 -D_IMPL_GTKXTBIN_API -DUSE_XIM -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/include/gtkxtbin -I../../../dist/include -I/usr/local/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I../../../dist/sdk/include -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include -fPIC -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -Wall -W -Wno-unused -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wno-long-long -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O2 -DXTHREADS -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API -I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -include ../../../mozilla-config.h -DMOZILLA_CLIENT gtk2xtbin.c In file included from gtk2xtbin.h:44, from gtk2xtbin.c:46: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1181: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1325: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1392: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1399: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1423: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1475: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1498: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1572: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1593: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1604: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1615: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1630: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1645: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL" gtk2xtbin.c:188: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type gtk2xtbin.c: In function `xt_client_create': gtk2xtbin.c:566: warning: implicit declaration of function `XtVaCreateWidget' gtk2xtbin.c:568: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast gmake[2]: *** [gtk2xtbin.o] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/widget/src/gtkxtbin' gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. I figure something is out of date, but I've updated xorg and gtk20 and I'm still getting this. Any pointers? Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 03:12:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE12416A4D2 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C799143D5C for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:12:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:12:50 +0800 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:12:49 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:12:49 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: I don't see anything to answer my q Importance: normal Priority: normal thread-index: AccNFjr+imK37FQ8Qn66S3qOs2BIMQABIq4Q From: "Wood, Russell" To: "rickie lyman" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2006 03:12:49.0961 (UTC) FILETIME=[ECFC3190:01C70D1A] Cc: Subject: RE: I don't see anything to answer my q X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:12:54 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of rickie lyman > Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2006 10:38 AM > To: questions@FreeBSD.org > Subject: I don't see anything to answer my q >=20 > I am a newbee and sometimes Dizzy too. My question is I have a computer > that > has a rather large drive but it is all formated in NTFs and yes it has XP > Pro on it how would I be able to put Free BSD on there without loosing the > files I have with the other operating system?? I told you that I was > confused. Being that you are new to FreeBSD I would recommend buying a small drive (40GB-80GB) and playing on that. Regards, Russell Wood DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 04:24:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8B816A403 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd5mo1so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A4B43D53 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:24:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd5mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr6so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.182]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J92007VXC6VIS90@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:23:19 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml3so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.147]) by pd5mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0J9200MUSC6VQLU0@pd5mr6so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:23:19 -0700 (MST) Received: from s01060013d45e14da.vs.shawcable.net ([70.71.24.198]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J92006FEC6V4ED0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:23:19 -0700 (MST) Resent-date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:23:17 -0800 Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:35:20 -0800 Resent-from: Andriy Babiy From: Andriy Babiy Resent-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Resent-message-id: <200611202023.17932.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Message-id: <200611192235.20418.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Organization: home MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 Subject: AudioCD file tags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:24:37 -0000 Hi all, My question is simple: what program should I use to set the tags? Actually, I need to change tags of audio tracks before burning them with k3b. I am not sure if those tags are the same that can be changed in mp3 files. I tried to change tags through: 1) KDE Konqueror (right click on a filename -> Properties -> Meta Info); 2) tagmp3; 3) k3b (right click on an audio track -> Properties... -> Title/Performer, no Year/Genre tags there); I can see all the tags in KHex editor, I can see differencies in tags when I change any of them using any of the aforementioned methods. But when I play them with KsCD, I see that some of disks were burnt with correct information (Performer / Album / Title), but many of them didn't have this information at all, so they are shown as Unknown Performer and Track 1 (2, 3, etc.). It looks that my changes had no effect at all. Is it a problem of setting tags? Or is it a problem of KsCD recognizing tags? Or is it a conflict of tag writing software versions? Or is it a problem with character encoding? Or is it simply a problem of my configuration? Many thanks in advance for your advise. Andriy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 04:39:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6E816A4B3 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jvk-list@thekrafts.org) Received: from smtpout15-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout15-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [68.178.232.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5CCF43D49 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:39:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jvk-list@thekrafts.org) Received: (qmail 16944 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2006 04:39:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gem-wbe29.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.189.163) by smtpout15-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with SMTP; 21 Nov 2006 04:39:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 29659 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2006 04:39:32 -0000 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:39:32 -0700 From: jvk-list@thekrafts.org To: "Wood,Russell" Message-ID: <20061120213932.10b6271f30786ad7adcc9756bb6c2f30.fa4ae1397b.wbe@email.secureserver.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII User-Agent: Web-Based Email 4.8.16 X-Originating-IP: 153.26.176.34 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:39:34 -0000 > Try: > kldunload if_ed > kldload if_xe > ... and see if it detects to card. > Regards, > Russell Wood kldunload complained: kldunload: can't find file if_ed: No such file or directory and kldload: module_register: module pccard/xe already exists! Module pccard/xe failed to register: 17 Do I need to rebuild a kernel without ed or xe first and then try to load them dynamically? Joe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 04:44:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01C916A412 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:44:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7F843D5C for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:44:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1198390uge for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:44:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=saPwan59FWQ6FQJ3ZnDi7gS+aJKe25Q4IWuslUBbKBsNZrZdzDZINH32naHi4wWf9cg752FAls2gLfCGqEGe+zbNixqwKRODIabIdwttRFavIWljqQVnJTnha+rfmG8Gbm5PrUSdQ9rU+Tnuw1SzVq0mLp9yMDOtDgnxzZuINA0= Received: by 10.78.160.2 with SMTP id i2mr5910513hue.1164084279259; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:44:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:44:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:44:39 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Daniel Goldman" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1484670fd8baed3a Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The Opera browser on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:44:41 -0000 On 11/20/06, Daniel Goldman wrote: > What are the primary issues with the browser on FreeBSD? We would like to > fix all of the problems, of course, but we need to prioritize them > accordingly. We need your help. We teach our users to seek support at questions@, ports@ and other @freebsd.org mailing lists. Ports is the centralized place to get software, lists are the centralized place to get support. Users can't possibly take part in every community for each of the hundreds ports they installed. We could say that it's a maintainers job to relay local support requests to a port's support facility. I guess with something as popular as Opera you can't just go ahead and relay everything. To make a long story short, welcome to the lists and we hope to see you stay here. You'll most probably get more info on opera/freebsd here than in any forum. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 04:53:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE8916A416 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:53:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB0F43D53 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:53:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:53:36 +0800 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:53:36 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:53:36 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Xircom XE2000 card problem thread-index: AccNJwzVKY1xc1NETzubk/sPHP05pgAAcfuA Importance: normal Priority: normal From: "Wood, Russell" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2006 04:53:36.0727 (UTC) FILETIME=[01237670:01C70D29] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:53:40 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: jvk-list@thekrafts.org [mailto:jvk-list@thekrafts.org] > Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2006 12:40 PM > To: Wood, Russell > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem >=20 >=20 > > Try: >=20 > > kldunload if_ed > > kldload if_xe >=20 > > ... and see if it detects to card. >=20 > kldunload complained: > kldunload: can't find file if_ed: No such file or directory >=20 > and kldload: > module_register: module pccard/xe already exists! > Module pccard/xe failed to register: 17 >=20 > Do I need to rebuild a kernel without ed or xe first and then try to > load them dynamically? >=20 > Joe. >=20 If_ed is probably compiled into your kernel so you can't unload. So yeah, try to recompile with that out. Regards, Russell Wood DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 05:52:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2922016A47C for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886E743D58 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:52:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-66-140-63-124.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [66.140.63.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617A4114307 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:49:01 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:52:21 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: UNIX - Questions Message-ID: <2A97A175E0A3D7A039D1AA98@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7b1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========9C7F9800B63009A259F0==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:52:54 -0000 --==========9C7F9800B63009A259F0========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On November 20, 2006 7:49:23 PM -0700 Dan Busarow = wrote: > > Well you don't need to worry about it being a problem with your Mac. > The traceroute isn't even making one hop. What's your routing table on > the server look like? Any ipfw/ipf rules? > I checked on the Windows box, and the pages behave the same way there, so=20 it's definitely not the Mac. No firewall running on the server, so it's not that. Here's the routing table: netstat -rW Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags=20 Refs Use Mtu Netif Expire default vl25-core1.cdc01.propgation.net UGS=20 0 98905056 1500 bce0 66 link#1 UC=20 0 0 1500 bce0 cpe-66-25-12-203.houston.res.rr.com link#1 UHLW=20 1 2 1500 bce0 66.221.96/19 link#1 UC=20 0 0 1500 bce0 vl25-core1.cdc01.propgation.net 00:09:44:d4:c8:0a UHLW=20 2 0 1500 bce0 1200 www 00:13:72:fb:2a:ad UHLW=20 1 56 1500 lo0 mail 00:c0:9f:0a:ef:a7 UHLW=20 1 686 1500 bce0 771 66.221.101.250/32 link#1 UC=20 0 0 1500 bce0 www.fieldoftrees.com 00:13:72:fb:2a:ad UHLW=20 1 4 1500 lo0 crawl-66-249-66-35.googlebot.com link#1 UHLW=20 1 22 1500 bce0 localhost localhost UH=20 0 0 16384 lo0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Refs=20 Use Mtu Netif Expire localhost.stovebolt.com localhost.stovebolt.com UH 0=20 0 16384 lo0 fe80::%bce0 link#1 UC 0=20 0 1500 bce0 fe80::213:72ff:fefb:2aad%bce0 00:13:72:fb:2a:ad UHL 0=20 0 1500 lo0 fe80::%lo0 fe80::1%lo0 U 0=20 0 16384 lo0 fe80::1%lo0 fe80::1%lo0 UHL 0=20 0 16384 lo0 ff01:1:: link#1 UC 0=20 0 1500 bce0 ff01:3:: localhost.stovebolt.com UC 0=20 0 16384 lo0 ff02::%bce0 link#1 UC 0=20 0 1500 bce0 ff02::%lo0 localhost.stovebolt.com UC 0=20 0 16384 lo0 Here's two traceroutes from the server: traceroute www.yahoo.com traceroute to www.yahoo-ht2.akadns.net (209.191.93.52), 64 hops max, 40=20 byte packets 1 vl25-core1.cdc01.propgation.net (66.221.96.1) 0.772 ms 17.661 ms=20 1.337 ms 2 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.76.17) 24.609 ms 24.603 ms 24.432 = ms 3 ge-6-14.car4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.111.233) 1.495 ms * 1.400 ms 4 ae-11-55.car1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.141) 1.896 ms ae-21-56.car1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.173) 1.996 ms ae-21-52.car1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.45) 1.950 ms 5 4.79.180.2 (4.79.180.2) 1.822 ms 2.321 ms 1.864 ms 6 ge-0-1-0-p130.msr2.mud.yahoo.com (216.115.104.85) 3.220 ms ge-1-1-0-p120.msr1.mud.yahoo.com (216.115.104.89) 3.258 ms ge-0-1-0-p130.msr2.mud.yahoo.com (216.115.104.85) 5.279 ms 7 te-8-1.bas-c1.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.193.5) 3.674 ms te-9-1.bas-c1.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.193.9) 3.312 ms te-8-1.bas-c1.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.193.5) 3.314 ms 8 * *^C [root@www ~]# traceroute 66.140.63.124 traceroute to 66.140.63.124 (66.140.63.124), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets traceroute: sendto: Host is down 1 traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=3D-1 *traceroute: sendto: Host is down traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=3D-1 Here's something odd. If I change the first octet to anything other than=20 66, the traceroutes run normally. But if I leave the first octet at 66=20 and change any of the other octets, they all return host is down. I=20 double checked, and the defaultrouter is 66.221.96.1 in /etc/rc.conf. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========9C7F9800B63009A259F0==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 06:08:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2838D16A412 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:08:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (claire.ber.rewt.org.uk [217.160.200.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5030F43D69 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:08:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B132C5C63; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:08:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at claire.ber.rewt.org.uk Received: from claire.ber.rewt.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (claire.ber.rewt.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FOmRLXWwzsvI; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.84.172.67] (dsl172-67.as6911.net [62.84.172.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2419A5C62; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <456297CE.9030103@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:08:14 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <2A97A175E0A3D7A039D1AA98@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: <2A97A175E0A3D7A039D1AA98@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: UNIX - Questions Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joe@joeholden.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:08:25 -0000 Paul Scotchmen wrote: > [root@www ~]# traceroute 66.140.63.124 > traceroute to 66.140.63.124 (66.140.63.124), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets > traceroute: sendto: Host is down > 1 traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=-1 > *traceroute: sendto: Host is down > traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=-1 > > Here's something odd. If I change the first octet to anything other > than 66, the traceroutes run normally. But if I leave the first octet > at 66 and change any of the other octets, they all return host is down. > I double checked, and the defaultrouter is 66.221.96.1 in /etc/rc.conf. Well of course, double check your routing table ;) (hint: second route entry) Ta, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 06:16:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F6B16A47B for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2166143D5C for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:15:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id kAL6G7MH017144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:16:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id kAL6G70w017141; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:16:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA21690; Mon, 20 Nov 06 21:39:53 PST Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:39:49 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: lolarch@tiscali.co.uk Message-Id: <45629125.3Ccz1PPAdMPxI2sg%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <000501c70ccd$bb0849a0$0300a8c0@home1> In-Reply-To: <000501c70ccd$bb0849a0$0300a8c0@home1> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:16:09 -0000 > can I put 2 devices onto one usb plug. > > I'd like to solder an internal card reader and a usb socket onto > one usb plug so that I can plug it in to the internal usb socket > on the usb card, is this possible? You can do it, but not quite that way. What you need is to plug a hub into the card's internal socket, and then plug each of the devices into one of the hub's ports. Depending on how much power your devices use, it might need to be a powered hub. In a way, this is easier: no soldering needed. BTW this is really not a FreeBSD question :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 06:39:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6064816A40F for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558B843D53 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by lists.lc-words.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GmPI9-000Kqa-OM; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:39:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:39:37 +0100 (CET) From: Zbigniew Szalbot X-X-Sender: zbyszek@192.168.11.51 To: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez In-Reply-To: <200611192329.36312.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> Message-ID: References: <"200611140009. 5 4183.mapsware"@prodigy.net.mx> <200611192329.36312.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changing swap size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:39:43 -0000 Hello, On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote: >>> I think not. żAre your computer still swaping? >> >> Yes, it is. I am planning to add more RAM. > > I mean, after you add memory, Are your computer still swaping? I tried adding memory to it but it wouldn't accept it. I tried 512 SDRAM 133Mhz, then 256 SDRAM 133Mhz but in both cases it failed to work with it. It is an older Compaq machine. I had to shut it down yesterday to install the memory and after rebooting I saw that no swap was used. Today I see that a few KB of swap have already been used. Currently thy system has 320 MB RAM. > If you can add enough memory, so you computer don't swap, you are gone to get > best performance. Yep, the problem only is why it wouldn't accept it. I am taking the specification it to the computer shop and will see if they are any wiser. Thanks anyway! -- Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 06:54:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982F416A40F for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16B143D69 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:54:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAL6sMSu032116; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:54:24 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk kAL6sMSu032116 Message-ID: <4562A297.2090900@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:54:15 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Lathrop References: <45623692.7040308@squaretrade.com> In-Reply-To: <45623692.7040308@squaretrade.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEFA4E45489EAEC5F774C4233" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:54:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2209/Mon Nov 20 22:40:59 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP_PASSIVE_MODE stumper X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:54:53 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEFA4E45489EAEC5F774C4233 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul Lathrop wrote: > My network lives behind an OpenBSD firewall which uses ftp-proxy to > allow active mode FTP connections out to the world. Unfortunately, > passive mode FTP just does not work in our current firewall configurati= on. Which version of openbsd? There have been two quite different pieces of software called 'ftp-proxy' in various versions of openbsd. If your firewall is running openbsd 3.8 or later you should have a version that, if correctly configured, will support proxying for both active and passive mode FTP. =20 The latest ftp proxy version is in FreeBSD ports as ftp/pftpx Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigEFA4E45489EAEC5F774C4233 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFYqKe8Mjk52CukIwRCN+0AJ9buUAHbo9VA1dIiksPTkVE/TbejACfTQ74 JoDuuk/cq9YpBhWM7kr6264= =f0s8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEFA4E45489EAEC5F774C4233-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 08:19:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A0E16A412 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0808343D46 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:19:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAL8JJcM086842 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:19:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <4562B685.5020807@tundraware.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:19:17 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <456259CB.1060002@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <456259CB.1060002@tundraware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Dynamic Hostname Assignment With dhcpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:19:28 -0000 Tim Daneliuk wrote: > I am running isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.4_1 on a FBSD 4.11-stable machine. OK, I mostly have figured this out at this point. I am able to dynamically allocate addresses from a pool and associate a name with that address that makes sense from the point of view of DNS. However ... the client seems to accept this name only if it does not already have a hostname assigned. That is, if the hostname is "". How do I configure dhcp to *force* the client to accept the name dhcp has cooked up and override the name that is already in place on the client machine? This behavior is noted both when I allocate a dynamic address/name with dhcp OR if I use dhcp to hand out static IP/name combinations (based on the requesting machine's MAC address). Help much appreciated... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 10:04:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2136516A417 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E875443D64 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:04:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D876D3659BC for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:04:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E643659A7 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:04:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBC1398CF for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:58:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4562CF3D.1070203@esiee.fr> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:04:45 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060828) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: NIC driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:04:49 -0000 Hello I will receive in few days my new mail server the machine will be an IBM X3650 bi xeon. I wonder what would be the "best" network interface to plug in (if necessary) as I don't know for now what is the builtin interfaces in this machine. To be clear I'm asking gurus on what is the "best FreeBSD supported" NIC driver to avoid eventual perfomances problems. Thanks a lot. -- Cordialement Frank Bonnet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 10:22:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6D316A580 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:22:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC4443D67 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:22:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id kALAMZx62942; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:22:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <002901c70d56$b56b5fd0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Frank Bonnet" , References: <4562CF3D.1070203@esiee.fr> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:20:45 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: Subject: Re: NIC driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:22:39 -0000 Reply Hazy, Try Again Later. Ted ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Bonnet" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:04 AM Subject: NIC driver question > Hello > > I will receive in few days my new mail server the machine will > be an IBM X3650 bi xeon. > > I wonder what would be the "best" network interface to > plug in (if necessary) as I don't know for now what is > the builtin interfaces in this machine. > > To be clear I'm asking gurus on what is the "best FreeBSD supported" > NIC driver to avoid eventual perfomances problems. > > Thanks a lot. > -- > Cordialement > Frank Bonnet > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 10:56:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A69716A49E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D0543D49 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:56:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by lists.lc-words.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GmTJ4-00015M-5H for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:56:50 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:56:50 +0100 (CET) From: Zbigniew Szalbot X-X-Sender: zbyszek@192.168.11.51 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: Re: changing swap size (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:56:53 -0000 As an update for RAM problems, it turned out I had to install BX SDRAM memory to get it to work. Interestingly enough, the original memory was not labeled as BX... but then... all that matters is that I have now 512MB RAM which is not too much but all I could afford to get at this point (BX RAM is much more expensive). I am interested whether this added RAM will minimize/exclude swap use. Thanks! Zbyszek ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:39:37 +0100 (CET) From: Zbigniew Szalbot To: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changing swap size Hello, On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote: >>> I think not. żAre your computer still swaping? >> >> Yes, it is. I am planning to add more RAM. > > I mean, after you add memory, Are your computer still swaping? I tried adding memory to it but it wouldn't accept it. I tried 512 SDRAM 133Mhz, then 256 SDRAM 133Mhz but in both cases it failed to work with it. It is an older Compaq machine. I had to shut it down yesterday to install the memory and after rebooting I saw that no swap was used. Today I see that a few KB of swap have already been used. Currently thy system has 320 MB RAM. > If you can add enough memory, so you computer don't swap, you are gone to get > best performance. Yep, the problem only is why it wouldn't accept it. I am taking the specification it to the computer shop and will see if they are any wiser. Thanks anyway! -- Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 11:06:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408E316A407 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022B643D62 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:05:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id kALB68x63198; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:06:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <002e01c70d5c$f134cc30$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Chuck Swiger" References: <454E9F7B.5010105@outstep.com> <454EB6D6.3030807@infowest.com><454EBEEC.1060002@u.washington.edu> <454F210C.9000602@outstep.com><004001c70706$0d571ec0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645><62104DC1-8AD2-41E1-B469-51CAC91A8D8B@mac.com><002701c70c85$db821eb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <4561E19B.7050706@mac.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:05:22 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: cremes.devlist@mac.com, Lonnie Cumberland , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:06:21 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Swiger" To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Cc: "Lonnie Cumberland" ; ; Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:10 AM Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD? > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > [ ... ] > >>> The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that > >>> runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very > >>> difficult to compile on MacOSX. > >> This is completely wrong. Take a look at macports [1] (formerly > >> darwinports) for a large repository of UNIX software that compiles > >> very cleanly on OSX. It's nearly 7 years since OSX shipped to the > >> public. In that time, most opensource software was updated to compile > >> cleanly on OSX. The primary changes to allow this were to the > >> "configure" scripts so they recognize darwin as a base OS. If other > >> patches were necessary, most software maintainers accepted these > >> patches back into their trunk. > > > > I spent a lot of time trying to build KDE on Panther and end up at a > > dead end. There's many problems there. > > That's not a very specific bug report. It's at least possible that reading > this would help: > > http://developer.apple.com/opensource/tools/runningx11.html > I read that at the time plus a lot more. Yes the X11 system was installed. If you have never tried building KDE on Panther I suggest you try it. This isn't something that a single bug report can take care of. I assumed like your obviously doing that all the reports on the Internet that were several years old that said KDE was alpha on MacOS X were out of date and that by now the problems had been fixed. I discovered they wern't out of date. Like I said, I think that if I tried it on Tiger I would have had fewer problems and gotten a lot further. But even the people that have tried it are all saying it's alpha quality - what parts of it they can get up and going, that is. > > A lot I understand were fixed in Tiger and there's somewhat of alpha > > binaries out there - but they must use magic to build them. > > No magic. A guy called Torrey Lyons (sp?), who used to be a Darwin developer > and ran (runs?) the XonX project, IIRC, did most of the work to port and > integrate X11 with OS X, and got things like pasteboard integration and > rootless X11 support, way back in the Rhapsody and 10.1/10.2 days. > > 10.3 and 10.4 should have shipped with a reasonable X11R6 distribution > available as an optional installation item. > That's what I thought with 10.3 but I was wrong. I haven't tried 10.4 so far. > > In any case, Tiger won't run on anything that doesen't have firewire > > so you can just toss out your older iMacs right there. > > Apple recommends you run Tiger on G4 or later hardware, but I believe that > Tiger will run on G3 hardware if you can get a DVD drive attached. > Rubbish. Apple came out with option CD installation of Tiger you could send away for, I did and I have it. A DVD drive is not necessary. And many G3s came with a firewire port and can boot it. But not all of them did and the ones that didn't you cannot boot Tiger on. > Given that the G3 machines came out in what-- 1998?-- the situation is > probably more to Apple's credit than to its detriment. Frankly, if you need > to throw out 8-year-old machines in order to run the latest version of the OS, > and you've gotten 8 years of decent utilization out of the hardware during > that time, you're way ahead of the typical 3-year depreciation cycle for > business PCs. > Oh ho, so where did the much-vaunted "Mac's retain their resale value longer than PC's" go that I used to hear spewed so often? I have 8 year old PC's still in service. One is even running Windows 3.X I use it for firmware updating old HP JetDirect cards that run pre-A05.05 software and to run cvt100 to act as a dumb VT100 terminal for a stack of devices that have ASCII consoles. Another one runs the DOS version of ICVerify and processes several hundred dollars worth of transactions a day as part of an automated system. In the last 5 years it's never crashed. I have customers still running Windows 2K on desktops bought in 1999 during the great Y2K scare when everyone ashcanned their old hardware and bought new stuff. In the last 8 years Microsoft has revised upward it's "product lifecycle" schedules about 4 times, each time extending them. So much for the so-called "3 year depreciation cycle for business PC's" That's wishful thinking by Microsoft looking for increasing their revenue stream, and by "power users" in corporations that want to spend more time playing with the latest software doodad on company-supplied hardware than doing their jobs. > Ted, you do know that Win98 & ME simply won't run on modern PCIe motherboards, > right? You do know that XP and Vista don't run, or run with extreme > compromises to video support and performance, on Pentium-pro machines without > AGP or with maybe AGPx1 slots with say, a 4MB Riva128 card? > Do you know the vast majority of business hardware in service isn't this advanced? You need to read up on the following: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/default.mspx Win98SE - little under 5 years of support Windows 2K - 5 years of support Win XP - 7 years of support, and unlimited with Windows Product Activation, at least right now. Vista - TBA In case you didn't realize, thats a linear progression. Consider that automobiles have been manufactured for around a century. Today a typical lifespan of a passenger car, as judged by parts availability on the aftermarket for repair parts, is around 25 years. That is, from 25 years of date of manufacture of an automobile, there's still enough of them on the road to make money selling new repair parts for them. Why is this? It is because auto manufacturing reached a plateau years ago, there's been little advancement of any significance other than lower emissions, and even that has reached the area of diminishing returns. The IBM PC was introduced August 12 1981, this is the 25th year of the personal computer industry. We are a quarter of the way there. Eventually PC's will run out of innovations and the new models that come out will be merely styling changes, just like cars, just like a host of other products that I could name. We are already developing a good used market in personal computers. What proportion of people that run FreeBSD and Linux do so on brand new hardware they bought specifically for doing this, verses used hardware that they bought a few years ago? Granted, businesses don't buy cars and run them for 25 years. But someone is running those 25 year old cars. And the computer market is waking up to the fact that the entire market isn't going to be driven by what businesses spend on computers, forever. > > Command line programs do compile, but you have to make > > many changes in some of them. Macports is fine if the program you want is > > in there. If not and your rolling it yourself, then you better know > > what your doing. > > It helps to know what you are doing, regardless of the platform or the > software in use. > > >> OSX has excellent support for most UNIX software. > > > > Uh, huh. Yeah, right. > > OSX has excellent support for the Unix software I want to run. > OK, that's better. :-) Ted > > There's not a lot of UNIX software out there that supports all > > the major flavors of UNIX very well, which is why the FreeBSD ports > > system is so important for FreeBSD. > > Or pkgsrc for NetBSD, or Fink for MacOS X, or RPMs for Linux. > > > And unfortunately more and more > > UNIX software is being written and built on Linux and not tested > > on FreeBSD. Take mysql for example, it's heavily dependent on > > threads and while the FreeBSD threads implementation is superior > > to the Linux implementation, mysql didn't work at all with it until > > recently, and it doesen't work as well as under Linux. > > With due respect for the FreeBSD developers, it's not at all clear to me that > FreeBSD has a better threads implementation than Linux. I've seen lots of > results favoring one or the other, although it seems clear that mysql in > particular has been tuned closely with and for Linux. > > Of course, Solaris has been targetting highly parallel systems (with 64, 128 > or more CPUs or CPU threads of execution) since before Linux was first > released, and Sun's been optimizing Solaris for highly multithreaded Java apps > for quite some time. For that matter, multithreaded Java performance is a > fairly high priority at Apple, too, but Apple doesn't sell hardware with > dozens or hundreds of CPUs. > > There are plenty of other reasonable choices besides MySQL, however-- postgres > or OpenBase come to mind, or even the classic BerkeleyDB for some cases. I > think postgres and FreeBSD make a fine combination. > > -- > -Chuck > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 12:29:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0D116A417 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:29:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net (pih-relay04.plus.net [212.159.14.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFB143D75 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:29:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=localhost.cpcnw.co.uk) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1GmUkl-0007Kb-Vi for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:29:32 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:29:50 -0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Graham Bentley" Organization: Custom PC North West Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061121120050.01E5C16A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20061121120050.01E5C16A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (FreeBSD) Subject: Slow Surfing all of Sudden !? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:29:34 -0000 Hi All, I just recently loaded FreeBSD 6.2 (RC1?) compiled a new kernel configured X installed Opera .... Web browsing was really snappy ! I have added some more programs including Gaim and generally tinkered around and today I notice that browser sessions are much slower. Looking at my router lights there seems to be a delay after pressing enter (after typing the URL) then ... some seconds later the page comes streaming in. Its odd because I noticed this exact behaviour some months ago when I tried out PCBSD. Everything starts of nice and quick as far as browsing the web is concerned then after some time / event ? this delay gets introduced ? How would I go about trying to figure out what is causing this effect ? Thanks ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 12:37:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8132F16A407 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:37:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAC843D67 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1264012uge for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:37:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=nYYP8CJ1Nea6NAbycaJpj+sC9mQO2aANIUSn0DQKaoCn3FiCxVMu3uw08anXKaKBclQLzkINlsmaeMDaDhiE5kCHljU3y2iAZG+ZPfEB85cdKqIZKQUjl7IMt6/n7yRqGmZaecmugnNm9tzYBeCq+Slyu0bltbHr0LyljPoUVMc= Received: by 10.78.128.15 with SMTP id a15mr6377724hud.1164112640371; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:37:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:37:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:37:20 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Graham Bentley" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061121120050.01E5C16A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c6206a4315613e3a Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow Surfing all of Sudden !? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:37:22 -0000 On 11/21/06, Graham Bentley wrote: > How would I go about trying to figure out what > is causing this effect? Try adding more RAM? You can look at some basic memory stats with top(1) Also, try other browsers - firefox, linux-firefox, seamonkey, konqueror, ..., and, of course, lynx :-) Good luck! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 12:40:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E8416A415 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:40:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C7A43D83 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:39:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21051205E17 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:40:17 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zW1Prx+ZLz-4 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:40:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A54205852 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:40:11 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:40:05 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 X-Face: &'; cS03F?rr_w2Qce.d2f7xmwXfcJWDs>}CkpDw.c]ZJJ_)i0Nx Subject: Disabled HTT in the kernel but not the BIOS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:40:18 -0000 --nextPart4819452.zu2OcCbRGM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I have a dual Xeon/HTT server that I run with machdep.hyperthreading_allowe= d=20 set to 0. At boot, it detects 4 CPUs: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 but top confirms that only processors 0 and 2 are actually running. So, ot= her=20 than top being unwilling to report more than 50% CPU load, are there any=20 other problems with running like this, such as the cache being split for th= e=20 benefit of the HTT that I'm not enabling? I can live with the cosmetic=20 glitch, but don't want to take a pointless performance hit. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart4819452.zu2OcCbRGM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFYvOp5sRg+Y0CpvERAt+wAJ0euFNFnFVgKALMpGZoxf2MUGv5awCgjvtM F00MYEPjueVrdBAUbrNv4w8= =2cQO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4819452.zu2OcCbRGM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 13:22:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33A416A403 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2778043D5E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:22:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kALDMHGo026921; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:22:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <4562FD87.1080105@wmptl.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:22:15 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Bonnet References: <4562CF3D.1070203@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <4562CF3D.1070203@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NIC driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:22:29 -0000 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hello > > I will receive in few days my new mail server the machine will > be an IBM X3650 bi xeon. > > I wonder what would be the "best" network interface to > plug in (if necessary) as I don't know for now what is > the builtin interfaces in this machine. > > To be clear I'm asking gurus on what is the "best FreeBSD supported" > NIC driver to avoid eventual perfomances problems. > > Thanks a lot. As for 100mbit cards: Hands-down, Intel 'fxp'-driven cards... rock solid in terms of performance and stability; never had a single unit go bad, used hundreds of them, including dual and quad-port cards. On the gigabit side: I've had great luck with broadcom cards using the 'bge' driver, and a few intel cards utilizing the 'em', but nothing real extensive or saturated enough to authoratively say they work under extreme pressure or anything. I've got a couple of dual-opteron servers here with dual on-board broadcom gigabit cards that have ben running flawlessly for over 2 years now, (uptime 378 days on one, the others were rebooted several weeks ago to be relocated to a different rack). Knock-on-wood, no panics or mysterious network outages as of yet - so I'd say they're fairly stable - but again, never end up near saturated over here to give you an answer on performance. Anyhow, just my two cents - if you don't need gigabit, ya can't go wrong with Intel 'fxp'-driven cards :) -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 13:34:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463D316A403 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E7E43D82 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:34:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 77A1F3658DC; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:34:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C503658B9; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:34:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5C3398CF; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:27:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4563005E.7010807@esiee.fr> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:34:22 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060828) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Vidican References: <4562CF3D.1070203@esiee.fr> <4562FD87.1080105@wmptl.com> In-Reply-To: <4562FD87.1080105@wmptl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NIC driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:34:27 -0000 Nathan Vidican wrote: > Frank Bonnet wrote: >> Hello >> >> I will receive in few days my new mail server the machine will >> be an IBM X3650 bi xeon. >> >> I wonder what would be the "best" network interface to >> plug in (if necessary) as I don't know for now what is >> the builtin interfaces in this machine. >> >> To be clear I'm asking gurus on what is the "best FreeBSD supported" >> NIC driver to avoid eventual perfomances problems. >> >> Thanks a lot. > As for 100mbit cards: > > Hands-down, Intel 'fxp'-driven cards... rock solid in terms of > performance and stability; never had a single unit go bad, used hundreds > of them, including dual and quad-port cards. > > On the gigabit side: > > I've had great luck with broadcom cards using the 'bge' driver, and a > few intel cards utilizing the 'em', but nothing real extensive or > saturated enough to authoratively say they work under extreme pressure > or anything. I've got a couple of dual-opteron servers here with dual > on-board broadcom gigabit cards that have ben running flawlessly for > over 2 years now, (uptime 378 days on one, the others were rebooted > several weeks ago to be relocated to a different rack). Knock-on-wood, > no panics or mysterious network outages as of yet - so I'd say they're > fairly stable - but again, never end up near saturated over here to give > you an answer on performance. > > Anyhow, just my two cents - if you don't need gigabit, ya can't go wrong > with Intel 'fxp'-driven cards :) > OK thank you Nathan I'll need the gigabit X 2 as we extensively use the imap protocol ( 500 , 600 imap processes during work hours ) thanks for your feedback -- Cordialement Frank Bonnet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 13:34:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B22016A504 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matti.k@bigpond.net.au) Received: from omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com (omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.83.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0863743D7F for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:34:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matti.k@bigpond.net.au) Received: from platypus.freebsd.home ([138.130.173.220]) by omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20061121133423.XLEP19269.omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com@platypus.freebsd.home>; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:34:23 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:33:27 +1100 From: matti k To: "Graham Bentley" Message-ID: <20061122003327.662280fd@platypus.freebsd.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20061121120050.01E5C16A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow Surfing all of Sudden !? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:34:35 -0000 On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:29:50 -0000 "Graham Bentley" wrote: > Hi All, > > I just recently loaded FreeBSD 6.2 (RC1?) compiled a new kernel > configured X installed Opera .... > > Web browsing was really snappy ! > > I have added some more programs including Gaim and generally > tinkered around and today I notice that browser sessions are much > slower. > > Looking at my router lights there seems to be a delay after pressing > enter (after typing the URL) then ... some seconds later the page > comes streaming in. Its odd because I noticed this exact behaviour > some months ago when I tried out PCBSD. > > Everything starts of nice and quick as far as browsing the web > is concerned then after some time / event ? this delay gets > introduced ? > > How would I go about trying to figure out what is causing this > effect ? If it's a DNS issue, try looking at /etc/resolv.conf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 14:21:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DD916A4C9 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:21:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from ns.beach.net (ns.beach.net [12.130.64.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E37E43D80 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:21:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from dpcsys.com ([209.137.253.157]) by ns.beach.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kALELRhg062709; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:21:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:21:41 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) To: Paul Schmehl From: Dan Busarow In-Reply-To: <2A97A175E0A3D7A039D1AA98@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> Message-Id: <9B486928-796B-11DB-8FDE-0003934CC29E@dpcsys.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) Cc: UNIX - Questions Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:21:56 -0000 On Monday, November 20, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On November 20, 2006 7:49:23 PM -0700 Dan Busarow > wrote: >> >> Well you don't need to worry about it being a problem with your Mac. >> The traceroute isn't even making one hop. What's your routing table >> on >> the server look like? Any ipfw/ipf rules? >> > I checked on the Windows box, and the pages behave the same way there, > so it's definitely not the Mac. > > No firewall running on the server, so it's not that. > > Here's the routing table: > > netstat -rW > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway > Flags Refs Use Mtu Netif Expire > default vl25-core1.cdc01.propgation.net > UGS 0 98905056 1500 bce0 > 66 link#1 UC > 0 0 1500 bce0 There's the problem. You have a route for net 66 # route delete 66 should clear things up. [snip] [root@www ~]# traceroute 66.140.63.124 > traceroute to 66.140.63.124 (66.140.63.124), 64 hops max, 40 byte > packets > traceroute: sendto: Host is down > 1 traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=-1 > *traceroute: sendto: Host is down > traceroute: wrote 66.140.63.124 40 chars, ret=-1 > > Here's something odd. If I change the first octet to anything other > than 66, the traceroutes run normally. But if I leave the first octet > at 66 and change any of the other octets, they all return host is > down. I double checked, and the defaultrouter is 66.221.96.1 in > /etc/rc.conf. With the route to net 66 the only machines in net 66 you'll be able to talk to are those in your LAN Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 14:31:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3E016A61B for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from henry.lenzi@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A084743D4C for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:31:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from henry.lenzi@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1295299uge for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:31:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=f9fH2MtNFBYmcYGRJWDUhwGHRXV6+N5RTwoK0Os0uDEzjLYq/fsQA83suSeDbxZgvsMa/Mhiz16GbH3xbEsUe9FPyFov474ENRZ4WuWJ+L3ZHuNWRWrrJPZYvlLXaM4xR9MBfZIlz2OgbZdPrVTRZtqk5qLhkADTXius9a0sGAM= Received: by 10.78.185.15 with SMTP id i15mr6514421huf.1164119490627; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.141.6 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:31:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8b4c81f0611210631q3688e71bo3a8792ef79835903@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:31:30 -0200 From: "Henry Lenzi" To: "Daniel Goldman" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The Opera browser on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:31:36 -0000 Hi Daniel -- Thanks for you support. I have posted on the forum, on ocasion. The main issues, for me, are 1) Java (idiablo-jdk - it doesn't work, even though the path is right); 2) the Flash plugin. Is there a way to use the Linux emulation layer in order to get the plug-in working? 3) Cyrillic fonts look small, and you can't make them bigger. All this referes to Opera 9.01 IMHO, Opera is by far the best browser, and I have used it since the days I used Win95. Cheers. Henry Lenzi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 14:33:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8595316A412 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D39A43D46 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:33:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kALEXPb4028601 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:33:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <45630E33.8040203@wmptl.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:33:23 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: Subject: flash plugin capable from amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:33:34 -0000 Is there a flash/shockwave plugin capable of running on 6.X/amd64 ? Running 6.2-RC1right now, with firefox and/or KDE's konquerer. Do I have to install under linux compatability? - Does this mean I have to install the linux version of firefox alltogether too? -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 14:48:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F352E16A62B for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:48:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob.middaugh@comcast.net) Received: from rwcrmhc15.comcast.net (rwcrmhc15.comcast.net [216.148.227.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C936A43D78 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob.middaugh@comcast.net) Received: from freebsd (c71476cd.state.nj.us[199.20.118.205]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc15) with SMTP id <20061121144827m1500a4juie>; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:48:28 +0000 From: "Bob M." To: Robert Huff In-Reply-To: <17762.12397.182517.766217@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <17762.12397.182517.766217@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:51:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1164120683.3380.11.camel@freebsd> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The Opera browser on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob.middaugh@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:48:30 -0000 On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:47 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > Daniel Goldman writes: > > > > What are the primary issues with the browser on FreeBSD? We would > > like to fix all of the problems, of course, but we need to > > prioritize them accordingly. We need your help. > > huff@jerusalem>> uname -sr > FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT > huff@jerusalem>> dir /usr/X11R6/bin/opera > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5024 Sep 25 10:29 /usr/X11R6/bin/opera > huff@jerusalem>> ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/opera > ldd: /usr/X11R6/bin/opera: not a dynamic executable > huff@jerusalem>> opera -v > Bad system call (core dumped) > > Where do I send the core file? :-) > I get the exact same thing on 6.2-Beta3. I get this as well(no core dump though): freebsd# uname -sr FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 freebsd# ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/opera ldd: /usr/X11R6/bin/opera: not a dynamic executable freebsd# opera -v Bad system call If that helps, Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 15:46:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557CB16A500 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82B043E6F for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:42:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4965388E19 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:42:39 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:40:00 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: UNIX - Questions Message-ID: <3974ECF15478CC1AAEE19789@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <456297CE.9030103@joeholden.co.uk> References: <2A97A175E0A3D7A039D1AA98@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <456297CE.9030103@joeholden.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========E2AC1617C2A37B95E235==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:46:50 -0000 --==========E2AC1617C2A37B95E235========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Tuesday, November 21, 2006 06:08:14 +0000 Joe Holden=20 wrote: >> >> Here's something odd. If I change the first octet to anything other >> than 66, the traceroutes run normally. But if I leave the first octet >> at 66 and change any of the other octets, they all return host is down. >> I double checked, and the defaultrouter is 66.221.96.1 in /etc/rc.conf. > Well of course, double check your routing table ;) (hint: second route > entry) > Care to give me a bigger hint? I'm not a routing guru. I tried this with no luck: route delete 66 route: writing to routing socket: No such process delete host 66: not in table Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========E2AC1617C2A37B95E235==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 15:53:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DAF16A416 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (claire.ber.rewt.org.uk [217.160.200.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A85643E74 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:50:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429BA5C63; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:50:51 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at claire.ber.rewt.org.uk Received: from claire.ber.rewt.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (claire.ber.rewt.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IK06X5xjB-rd; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.84.172.67] (dsl172-67.as6911.net [62.84.172.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DAD5C62; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:50:48 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <45632057.2080706@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:50:47 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <2A97A175E0A3D7A039D1AA98@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <456297CE.9030103@joeholden.co.uk> <3974ECF15478CC1AAEE19789@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <3974ECF15478CC1AAEE19789@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: UNIX - Questions Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joe@joeholden.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:53:56 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Tuesday, November 21, 2006 06:08:14 +0000 Joe Holden > wrote: >>> >>> Here's something odd. If I change the first octet to anything other >>> than 66, the traceroutes run normally. But if I leave the first octet >>> at 66 and change any of the other octets, they all return host is down. >>> I double checked, and the defaultrouter is 66.221.96.1 in /etc/rc.conf. >> Well of course, double check your routing table ;) (hint: second route >> entry) >> > Care to give me a bigger hint? I'm not a routing guru. > > I tried this with no luck: > route delete 66 > route: writing to routing socket: No such process > delete host 66: not in table > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Senior Information Security Analyst > The University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ route delete -net 66 should do it From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 15:55:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E59E16A416 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:55:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net (pih-relay05.plus.net [212.159.14.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C6643E18 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:51:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=localhost.cpcnw.co.uk) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1GmXuS-0004kv-OC; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:51:45 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:51:42 -0000 To: "matti k" From: "Graham Bentley" Organization: Custom PC North West Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061121120050.01E5C16A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> <20061122003327.662280fd@platypus.freebsd.home> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20061122003327.662280fd@platypus.freebsd.home> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow Surfing all of Sudden !? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:55:03 -0000 On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:33:27 -0000, matti k wrote: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:29:50 -0000 > "Graham Bentley" wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I just recently loaded FreeBSD 6.2 (RC1?) compiled a new kernel >> configured X installed Opera .... >> >> Web browsing was really snappy ! >> >> I have added some more programs including Gaim and generally >> tinkered around and today I notice that browser sessions are much >> slower. >> >> Looking at my router lights there seems to be a delay after pressing >> enter (after typing the URL) then ... some seconds later the page >> comes streaming in. Its odd because I noticed this exact behaviour >> some months ago when I tried out PCBSD. >> >> Everything starts of nice and quick as far as browsing the web >> is concerned then after some time / event ? this delay gets >> introduced ? >> >> How would I go about trying to figure out what is causing this >> effect ? > > If it's a DNS issue, try looking at /etc/resolv.conf Just has my isp's upstream dns servers. Are there any other .configs that may effect performance ? Its odd that its really snappy initially and after a few days of use (adding more software etc etc) then this 'delay' is introduced. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 15:59:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D4E16A4FB; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net (pih-relay06.plus.net [212.159.14.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DA643E41; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=localhost.cpcnw.co.uk) by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1GmXzy-00046T-NK; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:57:26 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:57:45 -0000 To: "Andrew Pantyukhin" From: "Graham Bentley" Organization: Custom PC North West Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061121120050.01E5C16A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow Surfing all of Sudden !? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:59:06 -0000 On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:37:20 -0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 11/21/06, Graham Bentley wrote: >> How would I go about trying to figure out what >> is causing this effect? > > Try adding more RAM? You can look at some basic > memory stats with top(1) > > Also, try other browsers - firefox, linux-firefox, > seamonkey, konqueror, ..., and, of course, lynx :-) > > Good luck! I am tempted to say it isnt a hardware issue. That 'other' OS is still fast as well as Zenwalk GNU/Linux - both as snappy as FeeeBSD was initially. I think Opera is actually faster than Firefox but I am sad to say that it too exhibits this odd behaviour here... type in web address press enter now page comes flying in Its that delay that I cant figure out, defo wasnt there after the fresh install and I remember the same thing happened on PCBSD which is why I wiped it for 6.2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 16:25:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9E416A585 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:25:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EC343D6D for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:25:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kALGNNmU046057; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:23:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kALGNNXw046056; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:23:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:23:23 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: rickie lyman Message-ID: <20061121162323.GB45815@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I don't see anything to answer my q X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:25:33 -0000 On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 09:38:26PM -0500, rickie lyman wrote: > I am a newbee and sometimes Dizzy too. My question is I have a computer that > has a rather large drive but it is all formated in NTFs and yes it has XP > Pro on it how would I be able to put Free BSD on there without loosing the > files I have with the other operating system?? I told you that I was > confused. First, is there plenty of empty space on that disk. If you have used up all the space with something, then you can't do it on that disk. You will have to add one. But, more than likely, you haven't used up the space - there is probably lots, more than half still unfilled. So, then, no problem. You will have to use some utility to shrink the existing NTFS file system on the drive. As far as I know, there are no freeware utilities that will do this for NTFS. The ones that come with FreeBSD will handle fat and fat32 just fine, but not NTFS. So, you will have to get a commercial one. The one I have used successfully a number of times is Partition Magic. It handles NTFS with no problem. I think it cost me around $60. That was a few years ago, so it might have gone up or down by now. When you get that, if you have a bootable floppy drive on the machine. make the floppy set from Partition Magic. It is easier to work with that way. It is easy - just choose that option after you start the CD and plug in the Floppies when it asks. Mark them 1 & 2 or 0 & 1 or whatever seems clear. Then boot from the first floppy. I believe you can do this by booting from the CD also, but, on the version I have, you cannot do it from a copy installed on the hard disk. NOTE: What the BSD UNIX world calls a disk slice, MS decided to call a primary partition. Then they concocted something they call extended partitions as well. FreeBSD continues to use the slice terminology (although there are a few places in the documentation where the writer scrambles them). Then within each slice, FreeBSD can make up to 8 (but really 6) partitions. So, in FreeBSD terminology, partitions are subdivisions of slices and not equivalent to either an MS partition or an MS extended partition. I have tried to be clear while using the terms slice and primary partition. So, onward. Using Partition Magic or other disk management utility that can correctly handle NTFS, shrink the NTFS primary partition (called slice in the FreeBSD world) to free up the space you want. Don't worry about its warnings about bootable sizes and boundaries. If your system is reasonably recent (something in the last 5 or 10 years) and the BIOS is recent, then those are obsolete concerns. Tell it to commit that change. Then have it create a new "primary partition" in the newly empty space. It needs to be a primary partition as apposed to a hidden or other type partition because it has to be the same as a FreeBSD slice. You can ignore its warning that having more than one unhidden primary partition can cause problems. It is sort of true, but only if you are using the MS MBR and you will replace that with the FreeBSD MBR later. You should have it make the primary partition as an unknown type or as a fat32 type. It doesn't know how to set it as a FreeBSD type (at least my older version doesn't). FreeBSD will set its own type in it later during the install. Make it commit those changes and you are done with Partition Magic. Then boot your FreeBSD install CD. It should ask you which slice (primary partition) in which to install FreeBSD. Of course, you want to give it the one you just created. That will most likely be either slice 2 or 3. The difference will depend on if your machine has a hardware vendor installed diagnostic slice (partition). Many vendors such as Dell and HP put their own primary partition on, usually in front of the MS primary partition. They install some diagnostics and hardware management tools in there. They make it hidden from MS systems. But, FreeBSD is not so easily fooled and it will see that as a bootable slice. It is generally recognizable as a small (around 65 MB) primary partition and it is usually in the first slice of 4 possible slices although I have seen it in slice 4 on a couple of machines. If it has a diagnostic utility set in slice 1, then the other used slice - usually 2 will have your MS-XP and your new empty slice will be number 3. If there is no vendor diagnostic slice, then your new empty slice will be number 2. You can tell this both from Partition Magic and from the FreeBSD installer. Anyway, install FreeBSD in the newly created and empty slice (primary partition). When you do this, it will also ask you about installing the MBR. You want to choose the selection to install the FreeBSD MBR. Then, during the fdisk piece where you tell it to create the FreeBSD slice, make sure you also have it mark the slice as bootable. These are two different things and both required for it to work. There is one other thing I like to do when the MS slice (primary partition) is NTFS and that is put in an extra fat32 slice which I use for communication between the two systems. The last I knew, FreeBSD is able to read NTFS type file systems, but is not able to write to them. But it is able to write (and read) fat and fat32 type file systems. So, rather than just the 2 (or 3 if there is a diagnostic set) slices when I am in Partition Magic, after I shrink the NTFS down, I make two new primary partitions. I put a smaller (maybe 10 GB) fat32 primary partition in between the MS-NTFS partition and the one where I intend to install FreeBSD. Later I mount this fat32 as an MSDOS and can use it to write things and then read it when I boot to MS-XP and vice-versa. Of course, if you add this extra transfer slice, it will be either slice 2 (if no vendor diagnostic slice) or 3 (if there is a diagnostic slice) and the slice where you install FreeBSD will become either 3 or 4 respectively - no problem as long as you don't go over 4 slices. That is easily done just as you are making the FreeBSD slice, but you can always go back and do it later if you want, by using the disk management utility (Parition Magic) to squeeze out some more space and put in a new primary partition. Remember that there can only be 4 primary partitions. One more thing, I have been successful ignoring any little whines that the fdisk stage comes up with about geometry. In general, nowdays all geometry is 'virtual' at the OS level and should be at the BIOS level although some BIOSen seem less informed. Have fun, ////jerry ps. I have written this up several times and a peek through the list archives would have gotten you all of this and saved me the additional typing cramps. Actually, it is also all coverend in the handbook and man pages, but possibly the more formal language can be confusing. /jrm > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 16:30:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B8916A47E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355D543D7F for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:30:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9A7388E37 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:30:35 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:27:56 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: UNIX - Questions Message-ID: <556BBD73A562FFF4DCEC1E21@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <45632057.2080706@joeholden.co.uk> References: <2A97A175E0A3D7A039D1AA98@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <456297CE.9030103@joeholden.co.uk> <3974ECF15478CC1AAEE19789@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <45632057.2080706@joeholden.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========52477ECA6C82E750CDF9==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:30:41 -0000 --==========52477ECA6C82E750CDF9========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Tuesday, November 21, 2006 15:50:47 +0000 Joe Holden=20 wrote: >>> >> Care to give me a bigger hint? I'm not a routing guru. >> >> I tried this with no luck: >> route delete 66 >> route: writing to routing socket: No such process >> delete host 66: not in table >> Thanks, Joe. I'll keep this in mind for next time. I ended up logging in=20 through the console (using DRAC) and flushing the routing table. Then I=20 restarted networking, and everything looked normal, but I couldn't access=20 remotely, so I rebooted the box. Now everything is normal again. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========52477ECA6C82E750CDF9==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 16:47:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9FE16A403 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC1E43D9E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:44:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kALGhPrg046137; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:43:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kALGhPGO046136; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:43:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:43:25 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-ID: <20061121164325.GC45815@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <200611192329.36312.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changing swap size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:47:03 -0000 On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 07:39:37AM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote: > > >>>I think not. ?Are your computer still swaping? > >> > >>Yes, it is. I am planning to add more RAM. > > > >I mean, after you add memory, Are your computer still swaping? > > I tried adding memory to it but it wouldn't accept it. I tried 512 SDRAM > 133Mhz, then 256 SDRAM 133Mhz but in both cases it failed to work with it. > > It is an older Compaq machine. I had to shut it down yesterday to install > the memory and after rebooting I saw that no swap was used. Today I see > that a few KB of swap have already been used. Currently thy system has 320 > MB RAM. I don't know what your hardware problem is that it won't accept the extra memory - maybe the wrong type or it needs to be in certain groupings. But, as for using swap space, remember that the system also uses the swap space for paging and it always migrates out old pages at various times. So some swap space will show up as being used, even if the system is not really swapping or doing serious paging. The problem only comes up when there is such a deficit of memory that it begins having to run from paged memory (eg forcing some pages out to allow some in for execution or data) instead of just hanging on to a few things there. Good luck on the memory addition. Check with Santa Claus about getting a newer machine that will accept lots more memory. ////jerry > > >If you can add enough memory, so you computer don't swap, you are gone to > >get > >best performance. > > Yep, the problem only is why it wouldn't accept it. I am taking the > specification it to the computer shop and will see if they are any wiser. > > Thanks anyway! > > -- > Zbigniew Szalbot > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 17:05:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B1916A494 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from achilles.leela.ws (achilles.leela.ws [66.207.162.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913AE44097 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:57:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.0.193] ([158.145.111.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by achilles.leela.ws (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kALGvlLL016729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:57:59 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Message-ID: <4563300A.2050408@mac.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:57:46 -0900 From: "Peter A. Giessel" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Bonnet References: <4562CF3D.1070203@esiee.fr> <4562FD87.1080105@wmptl.com> <4563005E.7010807@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <4563005E.7010807@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freeBSD Subject: Re: NIC driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:05:40 -0000 On 2006/11/21 4:34, Frank Bonnet seems to have typed: > Nathan Vidican wrote: [snip] >> few intel cards utilizing the 'em', but nothing real extensive or [snip] > I'll need the gigabit X 2 as we extensively use the imap protocol > ( 500 , 600 imap processes during work hours ) > > thanks for your feedback > I had a few problems with the bge card before 6.1 fixed some bugs. I would go with the em cards if given a choice. Intel develops their own drivers for the em cards, I don't believe that Broadcom does the same for their bge cards. I believe that bge is a third party effort, and while they do an extraordinary job, they don't have the same "inside knowledge" that intel has when they develop their em cards. man em: *** QUOTE *** AUTHORS The em driver was written by Intel Corporation . *** END QUOTE *** man bge: *** QUOTE *** AUTHORS The bge driver was written by Bill Paul . *** END QUOTE *** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 17:34:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427A716ADCD for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wc_fbsd@xxiii.com) Received: from cartman.xxiii.com (cartman.xxiii.com [208.62.177.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7754743D55 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:34:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wc_fbsd@xxiii.com) Received: from [192.168.0.218] (lan23.xxiii.com [208.62.177.50]) by cartman.xxiii.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kALHYgTe051916 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:34:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wc_fbsd@xxiii.com) Message-ID: <456338B5.3020108@xxiii.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:34:45 -0500 From: Wayne User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freeBSD References: <4562CF3D.1070203@esiee.fr> <4562FD87.1080105@wmptl.com> <4563005E.7010807@esiee.fr> <4563300A.2050408@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <4563300A.2050408@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: NIC driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:34:44 -0000 > I wonder what would be the "best" network interface to > plug in (if necessary) as I don't know for now what is > the builtin interfaces in this machine. A while back, I asked about "best" FreeBSD hardware in general, and unfortunately, got little response. But Nathan's comments below seem identical with mine. > As for 100mbit cards: Hands-down, Intel 'fxp'-driven cards... rock solid in terms of performance and stability; never had a single unit go bad, used hundreds of them, including dual and quad-port cards. Yup - have the fxp cards in all our older "white box" servers. Very solid. And if 100Mb still works for you, they can be had on Ebay for < $5/ea. > On the gigabit side: I've had great luck with broadcom cards using the > 'bge' driver, and a few intel cards utilizing the 'em' I have a couple newer Dells with the Broadcom / BGE controllers. They seem to work fine on 6.x. 3Com used to be considered "primo" in the industry. But I've had minor troubles with the '905 "xl" cards negotiating duplex on FBSD 4 & 5. Since then, guys on this list have bashed 3Com for their refusal to support and acknowledge FreeBSD... so screw 'em. -W From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 17:38:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A811916AF86 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: from richard2.pil.net (mail.pil.net [207.7.198.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BED443D69 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:38:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: (qmail 45484 invoked by uid 1825); 21 Nov 2006 17:38:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Nov 2006 17:38:43 -0000 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:38:43 -0500 (EST) From: up@3.am X-X-Sender: up@richard2.pil.net To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: External USB drive kernel problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:38:47 -0000 (Please reply directly to me, as I am not subscribed) I just bought a VIA external USB enclosure with a Hitachi 200GB ATA drive to use for disk-based backups. I put it on my test box here, which I just upgraded to 6.2-Prerelease. All drivers required by the handbook for this application are still in the kernel: device scbus device da device pass device uhci device ohci device usb device umass device ehci However, it will not even finish booting with the USB drive plugged in. It gets hung up on "Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle". If I unplug the drive, it immediately finishes booting ok. If I then plug it back in, I get this: Nov 21 12:17:23 amanda kernel: umass0: VIA Technologies Inc. USB 2.0 IDE Bridge, rev 2.00/0.03, addr 2 Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: 40.000MB/s transfers Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: 305245MB (625142448 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 38913C) Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: umass0: Invalid CSW: tag 9 should be 10 Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x10, scsi status == 0x0 Nov 21 12:24:58 amanda kernel: Opened disk da0 -> 5 If I try to then run sysinstall to run fdisk, it will not allow the fdisk configuration to be written to it. TIA for any advice, ideas, fixes, etc. James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 17:53:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC97716A47E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D591C43DED for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1GmZnP-0007e5-9v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:52:35 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: W3C List Manager In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk Message-Id: Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:52:35 +0000 Subject: IMPORTANT: your message to xmlschema-dev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:53:15 -0000 This is a response to a message apparently sent from your address to xmlschema-dev@w3.org: Subject: delivery failed From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:51:56 +0100 Your message has NOT been distributed to the list; before we distribute it, we need your permission to include your message in our Web archive of all messages distributed to this list. Please visit: http://www.w3.org/Mail/review?id=dc5dab4a62c188c1b969 and follow the simple procedure listed to give us permission to include your message in our Web archives. It should take less than one minute of your time, and only needs to be done once. If you do not give us this permission by Tue Nov 28 17:52:35 UTC 2006, your message will be deleted from our systems without being distributed to the list. Please do not reply to this message; for more information on this system, including information on how to provide feedback, please see: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/aa/ Note: W3C's mailing lists may not be used for unsolicited bulk email of any kind! -- W3C Postmaster, http://www.w3.org/Mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 17:53:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E36716A49E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: from web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5A0B43D45 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:52:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 58094 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Nov 2006 17:52:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=mO22N/aFQtUlEGJOPieTQmJlfYNMGbszrRr2jNlFo6JWY/v1jFp0r0tabD1WzX6ob676OMVVP0MRFxVb0gQ/Ojh9EleJaRyPdBDKBD2fSZ226iXm3K0guBPYTaLZdIRggmMPYgA2OKKg9JtrxsaRh3PMJFYp/DVDzqiBHtDAcJI=; X-YMail-OSG: CQwbSS8VM1kYgKkpmkE6f5_WP877p9PPLFbeFH42oHVVjlFbVmyDZth8loKOvd7cHbcWRcPjvc5k8qGBr5xqHj9iOwzFzjm7kkiFvD.hu6gqiHrJbu5nj2qECQ7RKxr65umRBffBlOsmdrs- Received: from [24.221.134.150] by web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:52:46 PST Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:52:46 -0800 (PST) From: Neil Short To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <39854.56921.qm@web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Subject: FreeBSD date drifts significantly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:53:15 -0000 my FreeBSD date drifts out of sync with the system date. When I set it, it is absolutely correct and matches the system (CMOS) date. I then reboot and - shezam! it's jumped 12 hours forward. Reboot again - another 12 hour jump ... until the FreeBSD date is about 2 and a half days beyond today's date - and the CMOS date. When I set up the system I said that the system clock is NOT set to UTC - but just to be sure, I went back into sysinstall and re-set the time zone the same way (MST - Arizona). I suspect this has something to do with maybe the server that is synchronizing my time; but I don't recall how to synchronize my time with an up-stream server. Can't find documentation on it either. Any pointers? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 18:46:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61F516A4FB for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:46:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Received: from entwistle.sonicboom.org (entwistle.sonicboom.org [66.93.34.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAED43E02 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:45:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (entwistle.sonicboom.org [66.93.34.170]) by entwistle.sonicboom.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kALIjOdY000954; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:45:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Message-ID: <45634944.4080706@sonicboom.org> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:45:24 -0800 From: Brian User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Short References: <39854.56921.qm@web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <39854.56921.qm@web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD date drifts significantly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:46:40 -0000 Neil Short wrote: > my FreeBSD date drifts out of sync with the system > date. > > When I set it, it is absolutely correct and matches > the system (CMOS) date. I then reboot and - shezam! > it's jumped 12 hours forward. Reboot again - another > 12 hour jump ... until the FreeBSD date is about 2 and > a half days beyond today's date - and the CMOS date. > > When I set up the system I said that the system clock > is NOT set to UTC - but just to be sure, I went back > into sysinstall and re-set the time zone the same way > (MST - Arizona). > > I suspect this has something to do with maybe the > server that is synchronizing my time; but I don't > recall how to synchronize my time with an up-stream > server. Can't find documentation on it either. > > Any pointers? > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Sponsored Link > > Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $420k for $1,399/mo. > Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Find some servers on www.ntp.org that are local to you. Then ntpdate servername will adjust the date I dont think ntpd is enabled by default, to get it running; add ntpd_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf edit /etc/ntp.conf to add a couple servers then either /etc/rc.d/ntpd start or reboot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 18:46:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A3116A503 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBCF43D9C for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:45:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A3A5FF6; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:45:39 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id knLy-Eg9Hmzc; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:45:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-95-165.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.95.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30245CF0; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:45:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45634948.7040107@mac.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:45:28 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: <454E9F7B.5010105@outstep.com> <454EB6D6.3030807@infowest.com> <454EBEEC.1060002@u.washington.edu> <454F210C.9000602@outstep.com> <004001c70706$0d571ec0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <62104DC1-8AD2-41E1-B469-51CAC91A8D8B@mac.com> <002701c70c85$db821eb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <4561E19B.7050706@mac.com> <002e01c70d5c$f134cc30$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> In-Reply-To: <002e01c70d5c$f134cc30$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cremes.devlist@mac.com, Lonnie Cumberland , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:46:43 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > "Chuck Swiger" wrote: [ ... ] >>> I spent a lot of time trying to build KDE on Panther and end up at a >>> dead end. There's many problems there. >> That's not a very specific bug report. It's at least possible that >> reading this would help: >> >> http://developer.apple.com/opensource/tools/runningx11.html > > I read that at the time plus a lot more. Yes the X11 system was installed. > If you have never tried building KDE on Panther I suggest you try it. While I rarely-- very rarely-- have a use for X11 in rootless mode, I wouldn't have any desire to run KDE on a system which can run the native OSX GUI. > This isn't something that a single bug report can take care of. That's entirely believable, but submitting a Radar to Apple, or filing a bug report with the KDE project, is at least a starting point, even if the changed required exceed a single bug report. Something that comes to mind, is that at least some X11 software depends on having a case-sensitive filesystem in order to build properly. If you're running into issues involving filename case, trying the build on a UFS partition or on the new Journaled/case-sensitive HFS+ option might work better. If this is an issue which affects KDE, the solution for people building from source is probably going to require changes on the part of the KDE project. [ ... ] >>> In any case, Tiger won't run on anything that doesen't have firewire >>> so you can just toss out your older iMacs right there. >> Apple recommends you run Tiger on G4 or later hardware, but I believe that >> Tiger will run on G3 hardware if you can get a DVD drive attached. > > Rubbish. Apple came out with option CD installation of Tiger you could > send away for, I did and I have it. A DVD drive is not necessary. And > many G3s came with a firewire port and can boot it. But not all of them > did and the ones that didn't you cannot boot Tiger on. Be that as it may, it's generally recognized that a vendor should support their hardware and software for at least five years; beyond that, providing partial support on a "best-efforts" basis is reasonable. If you go far enough back to the earliest G3's, they're probably lacking the minimal video hardware capabilities to run Tiger, or some such...but at least some G3's will run Tiger. >> Given that the G3 machines came out in what-- 1998?-- the situation is >> probably more to Apple's credit than to its detriment. Frankly, if you >> need to throw out 8-year-old machines in order to run the latest version >> of the OS, and you've gotten 8 years of decent utilization out of the >> hardware during that time, you're way ahead of the typical 3-year >> depreciation cycle for business PCs. > > Oh ho, so where did the much-vaunted "Mac's retain their resale value > longer than PC's" go that I used to hear spewed so often? I don't know, and I'm not interested in digging up old arguments. (I'm not even that interested in new arguments; I'd prefer to figure out the facts and leave debating opinions to others.) [ ...comments about old hardware... ] Yes, I've got a fair number of Dell PPros or D300-450's which are still providing good value, although the IDE hard drives are becoming sketchy this far down the road. The ones with SCSI (typ. 4GB Seagates, or 9-19GB WD or IBM UltraStars) have generally held up quite well. > So much for the so-called "3 year depreciation cycle for business PC's" > That's wishful thinking by Microsoft looking for increasing their revenue > stream, and by "power users" in corporations that want to spend more > time playing with the latest software doodad on company-supplied hardware > than doing their jobs. I was thinking more of the typical 3-year lease terms after which the hardware is valued either at FMV or 10% residual, actually. Well, maybe you don't do too much with hosting facilities which lease equipment for their customers. Anyway, I don't know about Microsoft's intentions, but it wouldn't surprise me that they'd rather sell a new license than permit people to recycle older ones. Seems OT for this list, however. >> Ted, you do know that Win98 & ME simply won't run on modern PCIe >> motherboards, right? You do know that XP and Vista don't run, or run with >> extreme compromises to video support and performance, on Pentium-pro >> machines without AGP or with maybe AGPx1 slots with say, a 4MB Riva128 >> card? > > Do you know the vast majority of business hardware in service > isn't this advanced? Sure. But it's what you're likely get when you buy new hardware today. And it's not just Win98 that has issues; from what I've seen, it looks like plenty of new BIOSes don't set up IRQ routing very well unless the APIC is enabled, and that affects older versions of FreeBSD as well. > You need to read up on the following: > > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/default.mspx > > Win98SE - little under 5 years of support > Windows 2K - 5 years of support > Win XP - 7 years of support, and unlimited with Windows Product Activation, > at least right now. > Vista - TBA > > In case you didn't realize, thats a linear progression. Quite right-- I *don't* realize that 5, 5, 7, TBA is a linear progression! Try plotting (1998, 5), (2000, 5), (XP [2002?], 7), & (2007, TBA) yourself and show us what kinda line you get.... :-) [ ...I don't disagree with your car analogy, but that's also drifting OT... ] >>>> OSX has excellent support for most UNIX software. >>> Uh, huh. Yeah, right. >> OSX has excellent support for the Unix software I want to run. > > OK, that's better. :-) Peace in our time? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 18:51:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CA016A494 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B9B43E41 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:49:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.51) id 1GmagJ-000A2H-Kx for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:49:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <002e01c70d5c$f134cc30$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> References: <454E9F7B.5010105@outstep.com> <454EB6D6.3030807@infowest.com><454EBEEC.1060002@u.washington.edu> <454F210C.9000602@outstep.com><004001c70706$0d571ec0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645><62104DC1-8AD2-41E1-B469-51CAC91A8D8B@mac.com><002701c70c85$db821eb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <4561E19B.7050706@mac.com> <002e01c70d5c$f134cc30$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-68--1003318518; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <3689E544-DE7A-474C-AE69-D21B855740B3@shire.net> From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:49:18 -0700 To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:51:55 -0000 --Apple-Mail-68--1003318518 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Nov 21, 2006, at 4:05 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > Oh ho, so where did the much-vaunted "Mac's retain their resale value > longer than PC's" go that I used to hear spewed so often? I am still running the original bondi blue iMac purchased on the first day in Aug 1998 with OS X 10.3.x of some sort. > > I have 8 year old PC's still in service. How many of them are running XP? --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net --Apple-Mail-68--1003318518-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 18:52:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541DE16A49E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A34543E8E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:50:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: (qmail 52119 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2006 18:50:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.mikestammer.com) (mikestammer@sbcglobal.net@70.131.98.204 with login) by smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2006 18:50:11 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: FeMl0VIVM1ldGKW9I2PZyvlurBackLIuz5byb0y2Xna01Sl.j0H1KSQ6kJeR8XD6xnrxRbXzVTZ3jvXVQcQo2XKyE_nN.Xmr2et7v0CMGD_RSadDpQjIh8W9UeS4K3PHKVDLhu9ZWxpbCSZGtpOKGYM4HH6iGfmjhIE- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F5C1146A; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:50:09 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mikestammer.com Received: from mail.mikestammer.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gondolin.middleearth.mikestammer.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AsR6YNrgAP-g; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:50:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eric) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4B711465; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:50:06 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <45634A59.3010707@mikestammer.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:50:01 -0600 From: Eric User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Short References: <39854.56921.qm@web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <39854.56921.qm@web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD date drifts significantly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:52:07 -0000 Neil Short wrote: > my FreeBSD date drifts out of sync with the system > date. > > When I set it, it is absolutely correct and matches > the system (CMOS) date. I then reboot and - shezam! > it's jumped 12 hours forward. Reboot again - another > 12 hour jump ... until the FreeBSD date is about 2 and > a half days beyond today's date - and the CMOS date. > > When I set up the system I said that the system clock > is NOT set to UTC - but just to be sure, I went back > into sysinstall and re-set the time zone the same way > (MST - Arizona). > > I suspect this has something to do with maybe the > server that is synchronizing my time; but I don't > recall how to synchronize my time with an up-stream > server. Can't find documentation on it either. > > Any pointers? > man ntpd has your answers. my /etc/ntp.conf looks like: server us.pool.ntp.org server 0.pool.ntp.org server 1.pool.ntp.org driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift things stay synced up tight on my machine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 19:02:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AF516A415 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0A843DD6 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:00:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DCA5DDB; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:00:52 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YPIDs2vdQmdR; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:00:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-95-165.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.95.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6AD5D62; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:00:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45634CDB.80203@mac.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:00:43 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changing swap size (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:02:03 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > As an update for RAM problems, it turned out I had to install BX SDRAM > memory to get it to work. Interestingly enough, the original memory was > not labeled as BX... but then... all that matters is that I have now > 512MB RAM which is not too much but all I could afford to get at this > point (BX RAM is much more expensive). I am interested whether this > added RAM will minimize/exclude swap use. The added RAM will certainly help to minimize or reduce swapping, if it is occurring. But you might want to post the output of "vmstat -s" after the system has been under normal load for us to evaluate how much benefit you're likely to see. With regard to what I assume you have is a 440BX chipset, the RAM requirements for it seem to be [1]: > Description > intel BX chipset won't recognize SDRAM correct. > > Solution > intel 440BX chipset has certain limitations: > > 1. A maximum of 1GB RAM can be adressed. > 2. Only SDRAM modules consisting of max. 64MBit (unbuffered) or 128MBit (buffered / registered) chips are supported. > > Largest supported SDRAM modules (unbuffered): > 4 x 64MBit = 32MB > 8 x 64MBit = 64MB > 16 x 64MBit = 128MB (double sided OR double height) > 32 x 64MBit = 256MB (double sided AND double height -> KEEP AWAY !) > > Largest supported SDRAM modules (registered / buffered -> look for row of small buffering chips on module): > 4 x 128MBit = 64MB > 8 x 128MBit = 128MB > 16 x 128MBit = 256MB (double sided OR double height) > 32 x 128MBit = 512MB (double sided AND double height -> KEEP AWAY !) -- -Chuck [1]: Second or third hit for "BX SDRAM" gives: www.plasma-online.com/english/help/solutions/bx_chipset_sdram.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 19:08:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFE616A51F for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:08:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D68443EB7 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:05:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93585DDB; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:05:44 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EhKg1GkA46kk; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:05:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-95-165.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.95.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBD35D62; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:05:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45634E01.10106@mac.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:05:37 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Short References: <39854.56921.qm@web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <39854.56921.qm@web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD date drifts significantly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:08:48 -0000 Neil Short wrote: > I suspect this has something to do with maybe the > server that is synchronizing my time; but I don't > recall how to synchronize my time with an up-stream > server. Can't find documentation on it either. > > Any pointers? Given the choice, it's better to run the BIOS clock in UTC, and have FreeBSD configured to do the same. But you can re-run sysinstall and change it via the menus, if you prefer. See the fine Handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-post.html#SET-TIMEZONE-LOCALITY -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 19:25:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8061616A509 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0948443DBF for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:22:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by lists.lc-words.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GmbCd-0007ga-Ht; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:22:43 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:22:43 +0100 (CET) From: Zbigniew Szalbot X-X-Sender: zbyszek@192.168.11.51 To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <45634CDB.80203@mac.com> Message-ID: References: <45634CDB.80203@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changing swap size (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:25:39 -0000 Hello, On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote: > The added RAM will certainly help to minimize or reduce swapping, if it is > occurring. But you might want to post the output of "vmstat -s" after the > system has been under normal load for us to evaluate how much benefit you're > likely to see. Thanks a lot. The output is below. I have a curious observation though I understand that this might be just a normal thing... When I booted today after adding some RAM, the free memory stood at roughly 300MB RAM. However, at present after a few hours work it is at about 220MB. I think the same thing happened previously with less RAM and growing percentage of swap use. I am keeping a log of free RAM snapshots to see it in the longer run. As for the vmstat it was taken when the system was about to finish delivering a batch of 800 messages to various domains. The messages are passed to an MTA in batches of 10 emails every 14 seconds. The load stood at about 0.70, though I know that at certain times (especially early in the morning when there are about 12K emails to be sent) it is a bit higher (I think it may be between 1.5-3). $ vmstat -s 20067169 cpu context switches 47298341 device interrupts 463804 software interrupts 4658824 traps 20972806 system calls 38 kernel threads created 28968 fork() calls 334 vfork() calls 0 rfork() calls 0 swap pager pageins 0 swap pager pages paged in 0 swap pager pageouts 0 swap pager pages paged out 1071 vnode pager pageins 9335 vnode pager pages paged in 1160 vnode pager pageouts 3429 vnode pager pages paged out 0 page daemon wakeups 0 pages examined by the page daemon 279 pages reactivated 1301875 copy-on-write faults 4119 copy-on-write optimized faults 1304531 zero fill pages zeroed 1261002 zero fill pages prezeroed 125 intransit blocking page faults 3396054 total VM faults taken 0 pages affected by kernel thread creation 2071675 pages affected by fork() 23259 pages affected by vfork() 0 pages affected by rfork() 3068343 pages freed 0 pages freed by daemon 2008851 pages freed by exiting processes 36223 pages active 16745 pages inactive 319 pages in VM cache 16736 pages wired down 56091 pages free 4096 bytes per page 8319135 total name lookups cache hits (90% pos + 7% neg) system 0% per-directory deletions 0%, falsehits 0%, toolong 0% Thanks again for your advice! -- Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 19:43:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4397316A415 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgordon@datapipe.com) Received: from exchewr01.datapipe-corp.net (exchewr01.datapipe-corp.net [64.106.130.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98DE43DA7 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:43:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jgordon@datapipe.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:43:31 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200611210640.09814.kirk@strauser.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Disabled HTT in the kernel but not the BIOS? Thread-Index: AccNaldbSrlXnmN1QqiANlGJYyiWHQAOufFg From: "Jay Gordon" To: "Kirk Strauser" , Cc: Subject: RE: Disabled HTT in the kernel but not the BIOS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:43:43 -0000 This is fine. It still shows it even though it will only load 0 and 2. If you are really worried, turn it off in bios. Jay Gordon Unix Systems Administrator DataPipe Managed Hosting Services - What It Means To Be Sure -=20 jgordon@datapipe.com | http://www.datapipe.com Tel: 201.792.1918 x2402 | Fax: 201-792-3090 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Strauser Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 7:40 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Disabled HTT in the kernel but not the BIOS? I have a dual Xeon/HTT server that I run with machdep.hyperthreading_allowed=20 set to 0. At boot, it detects 4 CPUs: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 but top confirms that only processors 0 and 2 are actually running. So, other=20 than top being unwilling to report more than 50% CPU load, are there any other problems with running like this, such as the cache being split for the=20 benefit of the HTT that I'm not enabling? I can live with the cosmetic=20 glitch, but don't want to take a pointless performance hit. --=20 Kirk Strauser From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 19:57:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C14716A5F0 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F4743D7E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:56:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7425FF1; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:56:58 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9utXYwQJqjr; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:56:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-95-165.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.95.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5695CB8; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:56:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <456359FF.8050602@mac.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:56:47 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graham Bentley References: <20061121120050.01E5C16A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow Surfing all of Sudden !? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:57:54 -0000 Graham Bentley wrote: [ ... ] > Looking at my router lights there seems to be a delay after pressing > enter (after typing the URL) then ... some seconds later the page comes > streaming in. Its odd because I noticed this exact behaviour some > months ago when I tried out PCBSD. > > Everything starts of nice and quick as far as browsing the web > is concerned then after some time / event ? this delay gets > introduced ? > > How would I go about trying to figure out what is causing this effect ? Run "tcpdump not port 80", and pay especial attention to the packets which are sent just before you notice these pauses. In general, it's probably a DNS lookup issue; you might find that disabling IPv6 lookups (unless you use IPv6) or running a local copy of bind with the -4 flag will help. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 20:22:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CAC16A47C for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C6443E9F for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:19:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=localhost.cpcnw.co.uk) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Gmc5X-00085b-SI; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:19:29 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:19:43 -0000 To: "Chuck Swiger" From: "Graham Bentley" Organization: Custom PC North West Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061121120050.01E5C16A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> <456359FF.8050602@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <456359FF.8050602@mac.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow Surfing all of Sudden !? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:22:57 -0000 On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:56:47 -0000, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Graham Bentley wrote: > [ ... ] >> Looking at my router lights there seems to be a delay after pressing >> enter (after typing the URL) then ... some seconds later the page comes >> streaming in. Its odd because I noticed this exact behaviour some >> months ago when I tried out PCBSD. >> Everything starts of nice and quick as far as browsing the web >> is concerned then after some time / event ? this delay gets >> introduced ? >> How would I go about trying to figure out what is causing this effect ? > > Run "tcpdump not port 80", and pay especial attention to the packets > which are sent just before you notice these pauses. > > In general, it's probably a DNS lookup issue; you might find that > disabling IPv6 lookups (unless you use IPv6) or running a local copy of > bind with the -4 flag will help. > Chuck, Thanks, tcpdump is cool :) I can see use of my isp dns etc. Very oddly things have speeded up again at some point this afternoon ? Perhaps, its not 'my fault' and the isp are up to something ? Anyway, its nice and snappy again so sorry for the noise (I learnt something though - Tnx!) Any tips for fine tuning tcp over adsl ? BTW - I compiled ipv6 out of my kernel - did I do bad ? BTW2 - Is it worth configuring Bind for local use on a single box ? Even from an educational viewpoint ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 20:23:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D86B16A6B1 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: from kim-out.schedom-europe.net (kim.schedom-europe.net [193.109.184.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CB9943DC8 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:20:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: (qmail 29935 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2006 20:20:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kim.schedom-europe.net) (193.109.184.78) by kim.schedom-europe.net with SMTP; 21 Nov 2006 20:20:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29462 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2006 20:20:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO laptop) (83.101.7.31) by kim.schedom-europe.net with SMTP; 21 Nov 2006 20:20:23 -0000 From: Beni To: Kent Stewart Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:20:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200611191328.58426.beni@brinckman.info> <200611191900.43496.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200611191900.43496.kstewart@owt.com> X-Face: %*c?V7%A[c.}s2rI*TaRWm-[I-, ZLpBKmmC-@)J}KGbr)=a, TsXSA=:ArC(<=?utf-8?q?v=5C/=5F=25BaB=24K=0A=09=24=60E=7D6=7EyjIqu/SN=3A=24Pb=7DGngR+8=3D?= =?utf-8?q?dE=60?=)V~48zl6) =?utf-8?q?BhEtfQ2=3D=7ChScx=3Frn30d!QMd=3F=2E=60/hR!l+=0A=09x?=(]+zXesMf?'W[>46aPKMAAwd7eT{X_O9besb[u]'Y(DAe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611212120.17017.beni@brinckman.info> X-Antivirus: This mail has been scanned for viruses by schedom vof (http://www.dommel.com) Cc: aharrison@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error in portupgrading audio/amarok X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:23:27 -0000 On Monday 20 November 2006 04:00, you wrote: > On Sunday 19 November 2006 04:28, you wrote: > > Hi, > > > > When trying to portupgrade amarok, I'm getting the following error. I > > did already a "make config" and unchecked the iPod option cause I > > don't need the iPod support. But the upgrade still fails. > > Any hints on how to get audio/amarok upgraded please? > > This is a strange one. I had no problem building amarok, so, I wonder if > you have dependancies that are out of date. You may have to > portupgrade -Rf amarok > > It this works, then, your system is really out of whack and you have > other programs with dependancies that need to be built. I would figure > this was from not upgrading the gnome stuff properly. > See /usr/ports/UPDATING. > > Kent > Well, Andy Harisson told me to : This has to do with the Gnome upgrade. =C2=A0Go here and read the part about using the find command and grepping for old libtool archives on your system. http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html#q2 But the strange part is that i'm using kde and not at all gnome... But i=20 suppose that due to the installation of certain programs (like amarok ?),=20 certain deps from gnome do get installed also. I followed the steps from the gnome faq and relaunched a portupgrade -rR of= =20 amarok. It completed without any problem now. To keep my ports updated, i do a "portsnap fetch update" and then=20 a "portmaster -a -i -v" to get all updated what needs to be updated.=20 Thanks for the help ! Beni. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 20:36:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E0416A4D0 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:36:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C296443DE4 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:34:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4393D5F5F; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:35:14 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TEzI6-U9MhaQ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:35:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-95-165.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.95.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0271E5CF0; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:35:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <456362F7.1060109@mac.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:35:03 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graham Bentley References: <20061121120050.01E5C16A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> <456359FF.8050602@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow Surfing all of Sudden !? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:36:15 -0000 Graham Bentley wrote: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:56:47 -0000, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> Run "tcpdump not port 80", and pay especial attention to the packets >> which are sent just before you notice these pauses. >> >> In general, it's probably a DNS lookup issue; you might find that >> disabling IPv6 lookups (unless you use IPv6) or running a local copy >> of bind with the -4 flag will help. > > Chuck, > > Thanks, tcpdump is cool :) You are welcome. > I can see use of my isp dns etc. Very oddly things have speeded up > again at some point this afternoon ? Perhaps, its not 'my fault' and the > isp are up to something ? It could be many things; tcpdump will help you identify the real cause(s). > Any tips for fine tuning tcp over adsl ? Check your path MTU if you are using ADSL via PPPoE; you might need to change your MTU down from the default of 1500 to 1492 or 1470 or so. The other thing to do is to set up a caching WWW proxy like Apache or Squid. > BTW - I compiled ipv6 out of my kernel - did I do bad ? Not if you don't use IPv6. > BTW2 - Is it worth configuring Bind for local use on a single box ? > Even from an educational viewpoint ? Sure. I just made my local nameserver authoritative for madserver.net so that a certain form of intrusive in-game advertising [1] doesn't work. And I've even set up a webserver which returns a 1x1 transparent pixel for all requests, and forwarded some annoying adserver domains to it. -- -Chuck [1]: Thanks but no thanks, Massive, EA, & Ubisoft. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 20:53:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4A216A416 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBAF43D6A for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:52:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kALKrHuF032337; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:53:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <45636738.2030307@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:53:12 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060925 SeaMonkey/1.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Short References: <39854.56921.qm@web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <39854.56921.qm@web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD date drifts significantly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:53:31 -0000 Neil Short wrote: > my FreeBSD date drifts out of sync with the system > date. > > When I set it, it is absolutely correct and matches > the system (CMOS) date. I then reboot and - shezam! > it's jumped 12 hours forward. Reboot again - another > 12 hour jump ... until the FreeBSD date is about 2 and > a half days beyond today's date - and the CMOS date. > > When I set up the system I said that the system clock > is NOT set to UTC - but just to be sure, I went back > into sysinstall and re-set the time zone the same way > (MST - Arizona). > > I suspect this has something to do with maybe the > server that is synchronizing my time; but I don't > recall how to synchronize my time with an up-stream > server. Can't find documentation on it either. > > Any pointers? Hi, Neil! Could you tell us something about the system's hardware, your FreeBSD version, and in particular, the output of `sysctl -a | grep timecounter` run as root? IIRC, some (older) processors had troubles similar to what you seem to be describing, when used with certain values of "kern.timecounter.hardware". You might experiment with setting "kern.timecounter.hardware" equal to each of the other values given in "kern.timecounter.choice" and seeing if the problem rectifies itself (or, possibly, becomes worse). YMMV, of course ;-) HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 21:00:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5145F16A543 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster5.tls.net (ecluster5.tls.net [65.196.224.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24DEE43D46 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:59:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 9118 invoked by uid 89); 21 Nov 2006 20:54:50 -0000 Received: from 208-70-40-179.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.40.179) by auth-ecluster5.tls.net with SMTP; 21 Nov 2006 20:54:50 -0000 Message-ID: <456368D2.4020907@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:00:02 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Building Sendmail from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:00:43 -0000 Good afternoon all, I am looking into upgrading Sendmail on several machines. Currently we run the installed version of sendmail and I have kept it up to date via security patches. However, in the planning for "what if a Bus hits DAve" scenario I would like to switch to using the ports. It should be easier for those who come behind me later. Currently I have my sendmail.cf file split into two files and I run Sendmail with two queues. I do this for MailScanner on each server. I also have my milter code and security changes in sendmail.in.mc and not in my sendmail.out.cf. sendmail.in.mc (*.cf) for the incoming mail sendmail.out.mc (*.cf) for the scanned mail which is then delivered to my internal mail handlers. Looking at the port I can see where sendmail is installed and I see I need to change mailer.conf to point to the new sendmail binaries. I can also modify the start script as needed to run two instances of sendmail with two different cf files and two different queue directories. No problems there. But, where will the port install my *.mc and *.cf files? This I can't seem to figure out. I would like to know before I hit 'make install' in the port dir. I would think it will install them into /usr/local/share/sendmail/cf, would that be correct? I want to make certain that when I build new sendmail.in.cf and sendmail.out.cf the correct files are used by m4. Currently I run the following when making changes to my *.mc files /usr/bin/m4 -D_CF_DIR_=/usr/share/sendmail/cf/ /usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 sendmail.in.mc > sendmail.in.cf Thanks, DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 21:16:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F42316A416 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF0E43FDA for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:11:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i20so562162wra for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:12:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=FCBC73m/GuNEbZ/9848kONCkCl8WLovtdIMxiT5vyarru9S7j4x+QPDsaFt5vBSv+21q/0qxv8UblPFdpgEqshGm+GBhklsuica/OsQEvHf4A0tDB5Ug0DgsyqzGKlClkO9BCW4sgKqvluyTimzHZ7YMt9lHXka/BdlV+mNbjog= Received: by 10.78.68.18 with SMTP id q18mr6936369hua.1164143521697; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:12:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:12:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:12:01 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: DAve In-Reply-To: <456368D2.4020907@pixelhammer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <456368D2.4020907@pixelhammer.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5ea2c3dd6b067fce Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Building Sendmail from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:16:09 -0000 On 11/22/06, DAve wrote: > I am looking into upgrading Sendmail on several > machines. Currently we run the installed version > of sendmail and I have kept it up to date via > security patches. However, in the planning for > "what if a Bus hits DAve" scenario I would like > to switch to using the ports. It should be easier > for those who come behind me later. I'm sorry but I just can't help it: have you considered that those who come after you might appreciate the switch to a non-sendmail solution more than saving them from staying on security branches (which I figure they'll have to do anyway)? Sorry :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 21:38:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0E216A416 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster5.tls.net (ecluster5.tls.net [65.196.224.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A108643D55 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:35:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 9392 invoked by uid 89); 21 Nov 2006 21:30:54 -0000 Received: from 208-70-40-179.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.40.179) by auth-ecluster5.tls.net with SMTP; 21 Nov 2006 21:30:54 -0000 Message-ID: <45637146.4050704@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:36:06 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <456368D2.4020907@pixelhammer.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Building Sendmail from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:38:14 -0000 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 11/22/06, DAve wrote: >> I am looking into upgrading Sendmail on several >> machines. Currently we run the installed version >> of sendmail and I have kept it up to date via >> security patches. However, in the planning for >> "what if a Bus hits DAve" scenario I would like >> to switch to using the ports. It should be easier >> for those who come behind me later. > > I'm sorry but I just can't help it: have you > considered that those who come after you might > appreciate the switch to a non-sendmail solution > more than saving them from staying on security > branches (which I figure they'll have to do > anyway)? > > Sorry :-) Don't apologize! I am a big proponent of the best tool for the job. We run qmail/vpopmail on my toasters, Postfix on a clients machine, and Sendmail on the MailScanner servers. It all depends on the needs, and how to best fill them. With no local delivery, inbound only available, and the MS boxes behind a PIX, milters are pretty much bullet proof and very stable on Sendmail. For what we use it for, Sendmail is a good choice. Plus, the MailScanner developer uses Sendmail, it's good to be in familiar territory if something goes wacky. With Sendmail, Postfix, qmail, Exim. I got a 3 in 4 chance of aggravating the next guy no matter what I choose ;^) DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 21:43:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B765116A505 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jvk-list@thekrafts.org) Received: from smtpout15-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout15-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [68.178.232.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48CC443D9C for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:42:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jvk-list@thekrafts.org) Received: (qmail 17699 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2006 21:42:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gem-wbe30.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.189.164) by smtpout15-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with SMTP; 21 Nov 2006 21:42:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 11551 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2006 21:42:44 -0000 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:42:44 -0700 From: jvk-list@thekrafts.org To: "Wood,Russell" Message-ID: <20061121144244.10b6271f30786ad7adcc9756bb6c2f30.bc73805163.wbe@email.secureserver.net> User-Agent: Web-Based Email 4.8.16 X-Originating-IP: 153.26.176.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:43:05 -0000 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem From: "Wood, Russell" Date: Mon, November 20, 2006 9:53 pm To: Cc: > -----Original Message----- > From: jvk-list@thekrafts.org [mailto:jvk-list@thekrafts.org] > Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2006 12:40 PM > To: Wood, Russell > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem > > > > Try: > > > kldunload if_ed > > kldload if_xe > > > ... and see if it detects to card. > > kldunload complained: > kldunload: can't find file if_ed: No such file or directory > > and kldload: > module_register: module pccard/xe already exists! > Module pccard/xe failed to register: 17 > > Do I need to rebuild a kernel without ed or xe first and then try to > load them dynamically? > > Joe. > If_ed is probably compiled into your kernel so you can't unload. So yeah, try to recompile with that out. Regards, Russell Wood Thanks for your time in helping me work through this. If nothing else I'm learning something about how the driver system works in FreeBSD... I recompiled the kernel without either ed(4) or xe and loaded them one by one. Loading xe did nothing, loading ed again gave the "device_attach: ed1 attach returned 6" messege. Guess I expected that. I'm still convinced it should be supported by the xe driver though, unless anyone can tell me that for sure it isn't. I've looked through the man pages for NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux and they all appear to use the same driver for the xe2000 as for the other xircom cards listed in the FreeBSD man page for xe. Where does the magic of matching a driver to a card happen? The card with the ed(4) driver attaches to the pccard0 device, which makes sense. I'm pretty sure it's a 16bit card not one supported by cardbus. Also do you know where the "attach returned 6" message is generated? I'm curious to know what condition causes it, but I can't find it in the source. I assume it's in the device attach function but I'm not finding it. Maybe I'm blind. Thanks again for helping out, Joe Kraft From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 22:12:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD5016A416 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FACC43D7F for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:12:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=localhost.cpcnw.co.uk) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Gmdqw-0001VT-B9; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:12:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:12:49 -0000 To: "Chuck Swiger" From: "Graham Bentley" Organization: Custom PC North West Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061121120050.01E5C16A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> <456359FF.8050602@mac.com> <456362F7.1060109@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <456362F7.1060109@mac.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow Surfing all of Sudden !? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:12:58 -0000 On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:35:03 -0000, Chuck Swiger wrote= : > Check your path MTU if you are using ADSL via PPPoE; you might need to= = > change your MTU down from the default of 1500 to 1492 or 1470 or so. Its over ATM [PPPoA] - Ive not found much Googling on tweaking this however I was reading the 3BSD section on this this page ; http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/tcptune/ and tried the following ; 3bsd# sysctl -w kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=3D4000000 kern.ipc.maxsockbuf: 262144 -> 4000000 Now browsing the GTK themes section www.xfce-look.org is (almost) instantaneous whereas previously it was always a crawl !!! Woudl apprecaite advice on any of the info on that page and how to make (good) settings permanent :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 23:06:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B897D16A403 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-237-189.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.237.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EDD43D53 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kALN6QdO021168 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:06:26 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.7/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kALN6QxQ021165 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:06:26 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id WAA29357; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:47:23 GMT Message-Id: <200611212247.WAA29357@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:19:52 EST." <20061120111952.4213dacb.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:47:23 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:06:29 -0000 In message <20061120111952.4213dacb.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>, Bill Moran writes: > > But... if I do something like copy a large file from one disk to another, > > and then do something that needs to read from a third disk, the new process > > may hang for a very very long time. If I suspend (^Z) the copy process for > > a moment, the new process gets its data. I suspect that the kernel is > > letting the copy process kick everything else out of memory. To some extent > > that makes sense. It is caching the most recently accessed data. What I > > haven't figured out is why the new process is allowed to hang for so long. > > I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if the disks > are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no > one process "blocks", but they're all a little slower. That is what I would expect, but that is not what I get. > > I had thought of putting in a circular buffer, but figured that it should > > be unnecessary since the normal Unix write-behind should buffer the > > writes from the disk I/O for me. I'll give it a try, maybe it will help. > > First, use the /dev/null test to verify whether or not the disks really > are the problem. You don't want to waste a lot of time on something > that may be unrelated. It works much better with /dev/null. With a circular buffer, it seems to work unless I generate a lot of disk I/O to the same disk it is writing to. I can do a "cat big_file > /dev/null" and it works if big_file is on a different disk. But with I/O to the same disk it fails. Seeks are slow so this isn't surprising. Despite the seeking, if I do a "cat big_file > /dev/null" (with big_file on the same drive) I still get about 45-50 MiB/s according to systat -vmstat. The weird thing is *how* it fails. The write doesn't fail or return a short count. The buffer never fills up. It is the read from the socket that fails: reading 1316 bytes from port read() from socket failed: Connection reset by peer SWAG: I wonder if having stdout be non-blocking means that the kernel is doing some sort of behind-the-scenes locking of the memory specified in the write call? So the buffer is really filling up, it just isn't visible to me? Then when the read pointer catches up to the locked memory the kernel blocks the read call, and the src machine eventually gets tired of waiting and drops the connection? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 23:11:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEFF16A407 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@inemy.com) Received: from server24.internet-hosting-services.com (server24.internet-hosting-services.com [66.103.152.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB3043D49 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:11:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew@inemy.com) Received: from inemyco by server24.internet-hosting-services.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Gmelr-0002Hm-Jl; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:11:19 -0500 Received: from 70.155.90.95 ([70.155.90.95]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user andrew@inemy.com) by www.inemy.com with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:11:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <2681.70.155.90.95.1164150679.squirrel@www.inemy.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:11:19 -0500 (EST) From: andrew@inemy.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server24.internet-hosting-services.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32010 32011] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - inemy.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Dell - kernel panic problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:11:30 -0000 I have a Dell tower that I've installed FreeBSD 6.1. [andrew@aaa ~]$ uname -a FreeBSD aaa.wp.comcast.net 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:32:43 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 [andrew@aaa ~]$ I have problems with what appears to be kernel panics when accessing the disk (either reading or writing). This box does nothing at the moment but wait for me to install and configure something, since it's a test box and hasn't even made it to live testing yet. The panics usually happen when installing something via Ports. Today, as I was running a "make clean", I managed to get this one: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x20000 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc083f0dc stack pointer = 0x28:0xdeaa3ad0 frame pointer = 0x28:0xdeaa3ae8 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0 current process = 70455 (rm) trap number = 12 panic: page fault Uptime: 1h20m21s Cannot dump. No dump device defined. Then, while typing this email after the reboot from the panic above, I got the following: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps Uptime: 2m4s Cannot dump. No dump device defined. I'm guessing this happened while fsck was running in the background. What's the next step toward getting a stable box so I can complete my software configuration and testing? What other information do I need to post? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 21 23:34:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCD016A407 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: from web56512.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56512.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC22A43D5E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:34:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 72930 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Nov 2006 23:34:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=FF+pQjx9T81pktHsclkukitaZPef9jlarfgrulFDFw0R9K0YuRCHEf6Avth/Ipm1EHg+JY4AONz90vuh4cBi7x6bOaUuaGbCa//ipSlRd2GZLGFPyLbvhZXpZaIra2p4BbSSd/RHJ0hbRlXtXy5y4ImzY2esv9CmBRaLftUIeSM=; X-YMail-OSG: hW1.H28VM1ms0KsYvJJ7ZIsv2gw3xWRe0YU2qIYINvK9YeQ7pQShXILtkF.bC9R2b8JW3HUNPmwXEtuvR5WOvVc4NKTUVrnGJuLIxIqXeUsXFcyZumZywuLZ6e7oqCYynrXcXoCQdPIUizM- Received: from [24.221.134.150] by web56512.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:34:32 PST Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:34:32 -0800 (PST) From: Neil Short To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <45634A59.3010707@mikestammer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <927899.71990.qm@web56512.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD date drifts significantly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:34:35 -0000 --- Eric wrote: > Neil Short wrote: > > my FreeBSD date drifts out of sync with the system > > date. > > > > When I set it, it is absolutely correct and > matches > > the system (CMOS) date. I then reboot and - > shezam! > > it's jumped 12 hours forward. Reboot again - > another > > 12 hour jump ... until the FreeBSD date is about 2 > and > > a half days beyond today's date - and the CMOS > date. > > > > When I set up the system I said that the system > clock > > is NOT set to UTC - but just to be sure, I went > back > > into sysinstall and re-set the time zone the same > way > > (MST - Arizona). > > > > I suspect this has something to do with maybe the > > server that is synchronizing my time; but I don't > > recall how to synchronize my time with an > up-stream > > server. Can't find documentation on it either. > > > > Any pointers? > > > > man ntpd > > has your answers. my /etc/ntp.conf looks like: > > server us.pool.ntp.org > server 0.pool.ntp.org > server 1.pool.ntp.org > driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift > > things stay synced up tight on my machine > This is very helpful information. I have been wanting to synchronize my date. It didn't really stop the problem; but I ran a bunch of test and have narrowed it down to the following - although I cannot dependably reproduce it. It has something to do with rebooting from windows (a dual-boot system) straight into FreeBSD (using my boot manager of choice: GAG.) It seems that if I boot into windows, log in and enter the windows time/date tool -- make no changes and reboot into FreeBSD, the FreeBSD date will lurch forward 10 to 12 hours. The CMOS date is still right. It's a puzzle; but since Windows seems to be required to duplicate this weirdness I'm not going to worry about it -- at least until I can duplicate it without winD'OH!s. Thanks for the input, guys. -N ====== Now I, Nebuchadnezzar, praise and extol and honor the King of heaven, for all his works are truth, and his ways are justice; and he is able to bring low those who walk in pride. Daniel 4:37 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 00:49:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7CB16A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB6443D46 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:48:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=localhost.cpcnw.co.uk) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1GmgIf-0005ZN-6b for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:49:17 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:49:35 -0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Graham Bentley" Organization: Custom PC North West Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061121202339.46C1016A5F4@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20061121202339.46C1016A5F4@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (FreeBSD) Subject: Opera > Cups > Print! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:49:18 -0000 Anyone got this working? Firefox and other apps all printing fine :) Tried Opera advice and googled about to no avail .... Thanks ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 01:05:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A10716A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:05:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from server1.tntpowerhost.com (server1.tntpowerhost.com [208.100.3.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F0543D45 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:04:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from ppp-70-245-187-233.dsl.spfdmo.swbell.net ([70.245.187.233] helo=localhost) by server1.tntpowerhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GmgYC-000Ks2-3R; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:05:20 -0600 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:05:11 -0600 From: Mark Kane To: "Graham Bentley" Message-ID: <20061121190511.70775f67@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: <20061121202339.46C1016A5F4@hub.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.6.0cvs56 (GTK+ 2.10.6; x86_64-unknown-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.tntpowerhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - mkproductions.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opera > Cups > Print! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:05:17 -0000 On Wed, Nov 22, 2006, at 00:49:35 -0000, Graham Bentley wrote: > Anyone got this working? > > Firefox and other apps all printing fine :) > > Tried Opera advice and googled about > to no avail .... Thanks ! Hi. CUPS installs a binary of lpr that prints to CUPS printers, so I do it like this: In Opera, go to "File -> Print", then the "Printer Program" tab. Printer Program: /usr/local/bin/lpr Parameter: -PYour_Printer_Name_Here You can find your printer name in /etc/printcap. This way is often much slower to start printing than with other apps, but it works. -Mark -- Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) - http://www.rock1019.net IRC: MIXXnet IRC Network - irc.mixxnet.net (Nick: MIXX941) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 01:06:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643D716A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C882843D46 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:05:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id h2so351348nfe for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:05:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jjFAGk8io2kavyDbrQnYO4/iJARQeDcfI3f7UkWallIiprC1dqu6obfUqHJ16278kArrWnkRvACNh2uizL0OMeSHj3kL3DfvLiGCBQFtq8Hid5ECblt8orYzY6RmvHafvsJFBHNCUebs64dnVqujbnO13rVdgRZyUlhKXfMgNU4= Received: by 10.82.175.2 with SMTP id x2mr1146362bue.1164157553364; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:05:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.175.1 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:05:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:05:53 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061121162323.GB45815@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> <20061121162323.GB45815@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Cc: rickie lyman Subject: Re: I don't see anything to answer my q X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:06:08 -0000 On 11/21/06, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 09:38:26PM -0500, rickie lyman wrote: > > > I am a newbee and sometimes Dizzy too. My question is I have a computer that > > has a rather large drive but it is all formated in NTFs and yes it has XP > > Pro on it how would I be able to put Free BSD on there without loosing the > > files I have with the other operating system?? I told you that I was > > confused. > > First, is there plenty of empty space on that disk. If you have > used up all the space with something, then you can't do it on that > disk. You will have to add one. > > But, more than likely, you haven't used up the space - there is probably > lots, more than half still unfilled. So, then, no problem. > > You will have to use some utility to shrink the existing NTFS file > system on the drive. > > As far as I know, there are no freeware utilities that will do this > for NTFS. The ones that come with FreeBSD will handle fat and fat32 > just fine, but not NTFS. A quick Gogol* led me to this: http://www.linuxmigration.com/quickref/install/disk.html Which mentions Man-drake 9.1 (& therfor is of dubious currency: http://www.mandriva.com/ ), though one might assume that many of thee Torvaldsians's so-called "distros" might do similarly. In other words: try a linux live CD/DVD. I would try knoppix, because I have a CD, except that I do not have an NTFS anything handy to test it myself. Otherwise, McAllister's writeup is sound, sane, and probably as in-depth as you can hope for. *http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=resize+ntfs -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 01:13:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958D516A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FA743D49 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:12:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAM1DJfj031936; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:13:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id kAM1DI1I031933; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:13:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:13:18 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20061121162323.GB45815@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Message-ID: <20061121180840.V31904@wonkity.com> References: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> <20061121162323.GB45815@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:13:19 -0700 (MST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, rickie lyman Subject: Re: I don't see anything to answer my q X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:13:22 -0000 On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Jerry McAllister wrote: > As far as I know, there are no freeware utilities that will do this > for NTFS. The ones that come with FreeBSD will handle fat and fat32 > just fine, but not NTFS. QTParted says it can resize NTFS: http://qtparted.sourceforge.net/features.en.html It's included on the System Rescue CD, as is Partimage, which can be used to back up the partition before trying it: http://sysresccd.org -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 01:19:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADCF16A5E3 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5F443D49 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:19:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:19:33 +0800 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:19:32 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:19:30 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Xircom XE2000 card problem Importance: normal thread-index: AccNtfx77E4HOiFhTl+hwh8gTze34gAHh33A Priority: normal From: "Wood, Russell" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2006 01:19:32.0556 (UTC) FILETIME=[43D440C0:01C70DD4] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Xircom XE2000 card problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:19:36 -0000 >Also do you know where the "attach returned 6" message is generated? = I'm >curious to know what condition causes it, but I can't find it in = the >source. I assume it's in the device attach function but I'm not = finding >it. Maybe I'm blind. Google can answer your question, I'm sure. Regards, Russell Wood DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 01:28:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C634B16A47B for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0012943D5C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:27:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=localhost.cpcnw.co.uk) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1GmguC-0000gc-4L for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:28:04 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:28:22 -0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Graham Bentley" Organization: Custom PC North West Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061121202339.46C1016A5F4@hub.freebsd.org> <20061121190511.70775f67@localhost> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20061121190511.70775f67@localhost> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (FreeBSD) Subject: Diablo-Jre / Javavmwraper / Firefox / FreeBSD6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:28:07 -0000 Im sure I had this working on 6.1 but Diablo-Jre pkg_add now complains that javavmwrapper is a later version than required by it, but installs anyway. No jvm plugin appears in about:plugins and pkg_delete refuses to remove. Anyone any suggestions with this - Thanks ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 01:33:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADC616A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7140543D45 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:33:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so340415nfc for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:33:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IWjKRMz6SHaKD8rg8mJ1/mT94wU1YD7zRFb8QutpFreF3PETOHiCldo7TBMW+ArqXnL9oV+FeVnRxyYIPeFSBTfvdguZS9oXNO6byHH3iMfvrfD4k4YuYAaRTdIX5+/l86SQ+qI7LOTWfh0YR9Ihl3VCCY4WwA4XXimtKEB2TFw= Received: by 10.82.142.9 with SMTP id p9mr1137677bud.1164159204058; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:33:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.175.1 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:33:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:33:24 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "up@3.am" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: External USB drive kernel problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:33:26 -0000 On 11/21/06, up@3.am wrote: > > (Please reply directly to me, as I am not subscribed) > > I just bought a VIA external USB enclosure with a Hitachi 200GB ATA drive > to use for disk-based backups. I put it on my test box here, which I just > upgraded to 6.2-Prerelease. All drivers required by the handbook for this > application are still in the kernel: > > device scbus > device da > device pass > device uhci > device ohci > device usb > device umass > device ehci > > However, it will not even finish booting with the USB drive plugged in. > It gets hung up on "Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle". If I > unplug the drive, it immediately finishes booting ok. If I then plug it > back in, I get this: > > Nov 21 12:17:23 amanda kernel: umass0: VIA Technologies Inc. USB 2.0 IDE > Bridge, rev 2.00/0.03, addr 2 > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: Fixed > Direct Access SCSI-2 device > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: 305245MB (625142448 512 byte sectors: > 255H 63S/T 38913C) > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: umass0: Invalid CSW: tag 9 should be 10 > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache > failed, status == 0x10, scsi status == 0x0 > > Nov 21 12:24:58 amanda kernel: Opened disk da0 -> 5 > > If I try to then run sysinstall to run fdisk, it will not allow the fdisk > configuration to be written to it. > > TIA for any advice, ideas, fixes, etc. Maybe something as simple as building your kernel with options SCSI_DELAY=10001 or even larger. Slow busses and some older hardware do not like small values here. Second, sysinstall is for installing the system, and is fairly horrible for day&day ministering. Better by far to learn the command line utilities. man fdisk man bsdlabel man newfs and if you are going to be sharing it between machines you might look into glabel. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 01:34:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865B816A415 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:34:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob_27_preston@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EC3743D78 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:33:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob_27_preston@yahoo.co.uk) Received: (qmail 24580 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Nov 2006 01:34:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=FMOWXe0Qq3Xa2DXHjd02MKwg4Ap2QDClfcXJ4MGazjoUcDzh64dGbP4Nk0khVZdKiMqaJ358SZPu21TucmS1+CC/bcV6VgEMZ5fSrdzM2Kf0B9VDytNXs+LB4rYlt7HAy3MeI8lvRO3hYHVEqvFgcoFnPi+mRqCzL5Og/TDAXjw=; X-YMail-OSG: ZA9YNBIVM1kH8G.kedjNuUTrdB.c5D0wbk_3SJXiXVWZNw6TJffs9KSt1bG7_P1ZU8OEI9NhXjU3oIP_RxpP2cBR.8agFD00wg3.eaN7HIEJRaog4pbJogvnWeBhiF_C7GOdJUkw7qdKHyG7uVbBtry1Xkzz2MIh8csa9rfYsP3kc8LewCgSax_Xiw-- Received: from [83.67.67.49] by web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:34:23 GMT Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:34:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Davison To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <231508.24266.qm@web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Upgrade Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:34:34 -0000 If my cvs-upfile reads, and specfically im looking at the default release line.... *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. Can anyone tell me what release and branch of FreeBSD im tracking. its a 6.1 system. I'm asking as I will soon be testing the waters with Buildworld and mergemaster etc to get to 6.2. What would the default release= change to then ? if 'cvs' is tracking the 6.1 branch ????? Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 01:42:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3009516A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: from richard2.pil.net (mail.pil.net [207.7.198.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C9BC43D45 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:41:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: (qmail 37912 invoked by uid 1825); 22 Nov 2006 01:41:57 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Nov 2006 01:41:57 -0000 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:41:57 -0500 (EST) From: up@3.am X-X-Sender: up@richard2.pil.net To: "illoai@gmail.com" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: External USB drive kernel problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:42:01 -0000 On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 11/21/06, up@3.am wrote: > > > > (Please reply directly to me, as I am not subscribed) > > > > I just bought a VIA external USB enclosure with a Hitachi 200GB ATA drive > > to use for disk-based backups. I put it on my test box here, which I just > > upgraded to 6.2-Prerelease. All drivers required by the handbook for this > > application are still in the kernel: > > > > device scbus > > device da > > device pass > > device uhci > > device ohci > > device usb > > device umass > > device ehci > > > > However, it will not even finish booting with the USB drive plugged in. > > It gets hung up on "Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle". If I > > unplug the drive, it immediately finishes booting ok. If I then plug it > > back in, I get this: > > > > Nov 21 12:17:23 amanda kernel: umass0: VIA Technologies Inc. USB 2.0 IDE > > Bridge, rev 2.00/0.03, addr 2 > > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: Fixed > > Direct Access SCSI-2 device > > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: 305245MB (625142448 512 byte sectors: > > 255H 63S/T 38913C) > > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: umass0: Invalid CSW: tag 9 should be 10 > > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache > > failed, status == 0x10, scsi status == 0x0 > > > > Nov 21 12:24:58 amanda kernel: Opened disk da0 -> 5 > > > > If I try to then run sysinstall to run fdisk, it will not allow the fdisk > > configuration to be written to it. > > > > TIA for any advice, ideas, fixes, etc. > > Maybe something as simple as building your kernel with > options SCSI_DELAY=10001 > or even larger. Slow busses and some older hardware > do not like small values here. well, it's very new hardware on both ends (USB2). Doesn't that SCSI delay only affect SCSI bus probing during boot, or would it affect it if I plugged it in after it boots? > Second, sysinstall is for installing the system, and is fairly > horrible for day&day ministering. Better by far to learn the > command line utilities. > > man fdisk > man bsdlabel > man newfs I tried both ways...the sysinstall is what the handbook recommended. > and if you are going to be sharing it between machines > you might look into glabel. I would definitely want that capability...thanks! James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 01:42:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E7716A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5474F43D45 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:41:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so342386nfc for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:42:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M+4wufd6E1+eU/NrJWcbWxRoZsv5sJVBd9ca9UEXbezBHXZsc4YL93U68J6AeUzMP0UbLf5goqZI5F//6OJYTsSbPUjud8A7/kLiIHa3agoIGpnxwV+CzMNrbQs7jZeEJ1lGow2IpQvWQUpQzY5vrr4S0UcA8zthoMi335lbqtI= Received: by 10.82.129.5 with SMTP id b5mr1141655bud.1164159728997; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.174.13 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:42:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:42:08 -0700 From: "Nick Pavlica" To: "Graham Bentley" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061121202339.46C1016A5F4@hub.freebsd.org> <20061121190511.70775f67@localhost> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diablo-Jre / Javavmwraper / Firefox / FreeBSD6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:42:11 -0000 Graham, I did some testing with 6.2 RC1, and was able to install the JRE and run some Java applications, however others had various errors. I'm just assuming that they will need to recompile for 6.2 when it's ready. I don't use FBSD on my desktop so I haven't tested the browser plugin etc. --Nick Pavlica From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 02:08:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C5416A407 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:08:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9139243D45 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:08:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so348138nfc for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:08:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=C5IjFkVWAowZp0L7gTi2LcVQHuHXolQa5iuSrSoE66kgA8X8rskuR+oqvwAOo0IrbO8RG9W72xNtZ0nYDUB0t3k8g3rir1uDyHMOx7GNrs6o41bLGJFiyQcxadO8rRHV652zks+dcLklSO/jb9Se18/KhYCC6yLWWG8H+6Y47rE= Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr1148671bud.1164161322482; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:08:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.175.1 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:08:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:08:42 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Robert Davison" In-Reply-To: <231508.24266.qm@web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <231508.24266.qm@web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:08:44 -0000 On 11/21/06, Robert Davison wrote: > If my cvs-upfile reads, and specfically im looking at the default release line.... > > *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > src-all > ports-all tag=. > doc-all tag=. > > Can anyone tell me what release and branch of FreeBSD > im tracking. its a 6.1 system. I'm asking as I will soon be > testing the waters with Buildworld and mergemaster etc to > get to 6.2. What would the default release= change to then > ? if 'cvs' is tracking the 6.1 branch ????? You need to specify a tag= either for *default or for src-all RELENG_6_2 for the latest 6.2 or RELENG_6_1 for the latest 6.1 (security updates) or RELENG_6 for whatever 6-STABLE is (6.2 right now but will soon enough be moving on towards 6.3.). http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html Especially noting the part: "There is an important special case that comes into play if you specify neither a tag= field nor a date= field. In that case, you receive the actual RCS files directly from the server's CVS repository, rather than receiving a particular version. " -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 02:46:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780C216A416 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mitch@netline.com) Received: from rathje.netline.com (rathje.netline.com [209.133.56.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF3443D4C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:46:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitch@netline.com) Received: by rathje.netline.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 2134411C635; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:46:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17763.47629.996181.786634@rathje.netline.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:46:37 -0800 From: mitch@netline.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 20.4.1 Subject: Dell 1950, PERC 5/i mfi support on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:46:38 -0000 Greetings! I need to bring up FreeBSD 4.11 (or any 4.x really) on a Dell Poweredge 1950. They are using the LSI PERC 5/i which apparently requires the availability of the mfi driver. The 4-STABLE release notes indicate that this driver is supported; however, I am stuck since apparently the install CDs available do not have this driver configured. Even the FreeBSD 5.x CDs I have don't support it during install. Has anybody else faced and solved this problem? If so, any help you can provide would be appreciated. -- do svidaniya, ~mitch From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 03:41:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC67316A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9E443D49 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:41:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so12808pyh for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:41:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=XNckOVZUDB1w+WHCTEaWdk52CxdD98Uj7wF9UFWTFBV7VcyJoZYn1TuzYUDhtRJrWB6vn/zM+y4ELrx2/kQzQYVvOv2qUIFEeqnx+g5kCD090K6beiFMS8zSJN/u/BnYglVoUoQVZIPAFIiCi+AahbOq4AEgNlvSbgNdxVsjPoY= Received: by 10.35.89.10 with SMTP id r10mr122770pyl.1164166898575; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:41:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:41:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:41:37 +0100 From: VeeJay To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, maanjee@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:41:39 -0000 Hi I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated. I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single user mode and steal the data? How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in single user mode, it still demands the password and without password one cannot do anything? or make it possible that booting in Single user mode, doesn't provide any shell? Thanks in advance -- BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 03:53:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E9816A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8AB43D6E for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:52:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAM3qMiw063366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:52:22 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id kAM3rJ1u012005; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:53:19 +0700 (ICT) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:53:19 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200611220353.kAM3rJ1u012005@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: maanjee@gmail.com In-reply-to: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> (message from VeeJay on Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:41:37 +0100) References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, maanjee@gmail.com Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:53:22 -0000 > I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? > > I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single > user mode and steal the data? If the data are so sensible, do notplace the machine in a shared location. One could reboot in single mode, or just stop the machine and remove the hard disk to analyze it at his own pace. Single user password tends to give a false sense of security, if one has physical access to the machine, consider he has open access to the data stored on the machine. best regards, olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 03:56:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8DE16A407 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmeek@rem1tech.com) Received: from mail.rem1tech.com (aries.rem1tech.com [72.232.211.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFAB43D46 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:56:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmeek@rem1tech.com) Received: (qmail 95261 invoked by uid 89); 22 Nov 2006 03:56:56 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 94266, pid: 94342, t: 0.0130s scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.6/m:41/d:2187 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (rmeek@rem1tech.com@72.232.211.187) by mail.rem1tech.com with ESMTPA; 22 Nov 2006 03:56:56 -0000 Received: from rrcs-67-79-176-182.se.biz.rr.com (rrcs-67-79-176-182.se.biz.rr.com [67.79.176.182]) by secure.rem1tech.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:56:56 -0500 Message-ID: <20061121225656.21bkd9htlw0c0os4@secure.rem1tech.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:56:56 -0500 From: "Russell E. Meek" To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:56:57 -0000 Quoting VeeJay : > Hi > > I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated= . > > I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? > > I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single > user mode and steal the data? > How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in single user mode, it > still demands the password and without password one cannot do anything? > or make it possible that booting in Single user mode, doesn't provide any > shell? > > Thanks in advance > > -- > > BR / vj > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" BR, Edit /etc/ttys and look for this: # If console is marked "insecure", then init will ask for the root =20 password when going to single-user mode. console none unknown off secure Change From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 03:59:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE50216A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmeek@rem1tech.com) Received: from mail.rem1tech.com (aries.rem1tech.com [72.232.211.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4205743D6E for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:58:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmeek@rem1tech.com) Received: (qmail 8272 invoked by uid 89); 22 Nov 2006 03:59:03 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 7907, pid: 7985, t: 0.0131s scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.6/m:41/d:2187 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (rmeek@rem1tech.com@72.232.211.187) by mail.rem1tech.com with ESMTPA; 22 Nov 2006 03:59:03 -0000 Received: from rrcs-67-79-176-182.se.biz.rr.com (rrcs-67-79-176-182.se.biz.rr.com [67.79.176.182]) by secure.rem1tech.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:59:03 -0500 Message-ID: <20061121225903.fswba3d1uss8wgos@secure.rem1tech.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:59:03 -0500 From: "Russell E. Meek" To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:59:10 -0000 Quoting VeeJay : > Hi > > I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated= . > > I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? > > I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single > user mode and steal the data? > How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in single user mode, it > still demands the password and without password one cannot do anything? > or make it possible that booting in Single user mode, doesn't provide any > shell? > > Thanks in advance > > -- > > BR / vj > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" BR, Edit /etc/ttys and look for the following line: # If console is marked "insecure", then init will ask for the root password # when going to single-user mode. console none unknown off secure Change "secure" to "insecure" (no quotes) this will require the root =20 password to be entered when booting into Single User Mode. Thanks, Russ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 04:08:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3AB16A47E for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy08.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F100143D94 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:07:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy08 [148.235.52.28]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.05 (built Mar 3 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J9400AID653W3@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:07:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from morena.maps.mx(dsl-189-165-11-230.prod-infinitum.com.mx [189.165.11.230]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.05 (built Mar 3 2005))with ESMTP id <0J9400HXO652XT@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:07:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:07:50 -0700 From: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez In-reply-to: <4563300A.2050408@mac.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200611212107.50950.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 X-imss-version: 2.044 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:95.47614 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:5 C:4 M:4 S:4 R:4 (1.5000 1.5000) References: <4562CF3D.1070203@esiee.fr> <4563005E.7010807@esiee.fr> <4563300A.2050408@mac.com> Subject: Re: NIC driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:08:05 -0000 El Mar 21 Nov 2006 09:57, Peter A. Giessel escribi=F3: > man em: > *** QUOTE *** > AUTHORS > The em driver was written by Intel Corporation > . > *** END QUOTE *** > > man bge: > *** QUOTE *** > AUTHORS > The bge driver was written by Bill Paul . > *** END QUOTE *** Hi: =46orget about bge, since Bill Paul do not support this driver anymore! Here is the mail that he send me some months ago. =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------ El Mar 14 Mar 2006 22:22, escribi=F3: > Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Martin Alejandro > > Paredes Sanchez had to walk into mine and say: > > Hi: > > > > The problem is that the network card is not detected, is a network card > > Boradcom in the mother board. I see a chip with this numbers: > > > > Broadcom > > BCM5751FKFB > > HS0521 P21 > > 744910 N > > > > Whit "dmesg | grep -i ethe" I got: > > > > pci2: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > > > > With "pciconf -lv" I got: > > > > none3@pci2:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x02f71014 chip=3D0x167e14e4 re= v=3D0x11 > > hdr=3D0x00 > > vendor =3D 'Broadcom Corporation' > > device =3D 'BCM5751F NetXtreme Fast Ethernet PCI Express' > > class =3D network > > subclass =3D ethernet > > > > The manual for bge(4), says: > > > > bge -- Broadcom BCM570x/5714/5721/5750/5751/5789 PCI Gigabit Ethernet > > adapter driver > > > > is this nic supported? > > > > TIA > > Oh for crap's sake. How many people are going to keep bothering me with > this. For the umpity-umpth time, I do not support this driver anymore! > > Why don't you make a tiny bit of effort and find out for yourself if the > NIC is supported! Edit /sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h, and change this: > > #define BCOM_DEVICEID_BCM5751M 0x167D > > to this: > > #define BCOM_DEVICEID_BCM5751M 0x167E > > Then recompile your kernel and find out for yourself it it works. Then ma= il > all your findings to the freebsd-current mailing list and ask for someone > to update the driver. > > -Bill > > -- > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D >=3D=3D -Bill Paul (510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of U= nix-Fu > wpaul@windriver.com | Wind River Systems > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D >=3D=3D "Ignorance may be bliss, but delusion is ecstasy!" -Perki > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D >=3D=3D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 04:10:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B28516A47C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from billion.wu@areca.com.tw) Received: from areca.com.tw (220-130-178-142.HINET-IP.hinet.net [220.130.178.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8C043E07 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:09:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from billion.wu@areca.com.tw) Received: from arecabillion ([192.168.0.154] unverified) by areca.com.tw with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:00:09 +0800 Message-ID: <004501c70dec$0ccf65b0$9a00a8c0@arecabillion> From: "Billion Wu" To: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:09:45 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2006 04:00:09.0484 (UTC) FILETIME=[B3E2C4C0:01C70DEA] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: Contact windows for drive update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:10:30 -0000 Hi, Our engineer has submitted the new version driver. From: "erich" To: "Jun Kuriyama" ; "Ken Smith"=20 ; "Gordon Tetlow" ; "Peter = Wemm"=20 ; "David Wolfskill" But, we still can not find the new updated driver in the following link. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/arcmsr/arcmsr.c?only_wi= th_tag=3DMAIN . We have added many improvement in our new drive including Intel IOP341=20 controller, high ports (24 Ports) and SAS RAID controller. The Intel IOP341 controller (ARC-1280Ml/1280) can reach up to 800MB/S in = sustained transfer rate. Many storage appliances is happy this = performance. We continue to receive requesting from our customer that the new version = drive can add into the FreeBSD kernel tree. Do we miss something? If we contact the wrong windows, please give us the right person email. Regards Billion Wu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 04:59:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C88E16A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcullip@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A28543D46 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:59:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcullip@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so51601nzh for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:59:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ZB9cCf9e8k1OdPVzXMA0AWCu2V4otmTCwHkwbTz9WhFJLoQRfXtLnbJ/FcB2jVT22Uahdbg0etI1AagWh3h+FQoTs7oKnsYzDvwegE5IeNwcWjipgz9tlwoYrBstFS8U5FJYoWJL07ArAhm+DKXBhHimPVZektdIxnuyPlx3LLU= Received: by 10.35.9.15 with SMTP id m15mr523967pyi.1164171590908; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:59:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.67.17 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:59:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:59:50 -0500 From: "Jason Cullip" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Help with pkg_install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:59:52 -0000 Hi all, Problem: OS: FreeBSD 4.8 After running the latest ports_supfile I can no longer install new ports. Here is the error message I receive when trying to install a new package / port: ===> Building for pkg_install-20060113 ===> lib cc -O -pipe -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wnon-const-format -Wno-format-extra-args -c file.c -o file.o In file included from file.c:24: lib.h:33: stdarg.h: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_install/work/pkg_install-20060113/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_install/work/pkg_install-20060113. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_install. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. If you need further information I can run make in debug mode and provide more output. Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 05:59:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CC816A4C8 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 05:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28BC43D66 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 05:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so400253nfc for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:57:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Yb8hEeR+yOKAbUE3q2X3VxgBUCq7WLozvAz3owAsfBkw3tWLP5s/kD8pLqRlbuNY2ImbTDi0qs3jSk81U18HRIqZuLh9dm3chtfx8vPNJSddVQTlTH0mhkNcXR0CwIpDp9eWqsgcTmqiW9lWt4Ug31S8NkFl3ehCZ5bVQdhPiGM= Received: by 10.82.139.17 with SMTP id m17mr1169717bud.1164175059653; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:57:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.18 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:57:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5aaed53f0611212157j73402ebeh30d4d2493b52fbc9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:57:39 -0600 From: "Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T" Sender: dundeemt@gmail.com To: Eric In-Reply-To: <45634A59.3010707@mikestammer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <39854.56921.qm@web56511.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <45634A59.3010707@mikestammer.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3e70c2cfc3affdb1 Cc: Neil Short , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD date drifts significantly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 05:59:11 -0000 On 11/21/06, Eric wrote: > Neil Short wrote: > > my FreeBSD date drifts out of sync with the system > > date. > > > > When I set it, it is absolutely correct and matches > > the system (CMOS) date. I then reboot and - shezam! > > it's jumped 12 hours forward. Reboot again - another > > 12 hour jump ... until the FreeBSD date is about 2 and > > a half days beyond today's date - and the CMOS date. > > > > When I set up the system I said that the system clock > > is NOT set to UTC - but just to be sure, I went back > > into sysinstall and re-set the time zone the same way > > (MST - Arizona). > > > > I suspect this has something to do with maybe the > > server that is synchronizing my time; but I don't > > recall how to synchronize my time with an up-stream > > server. Can't find documentation on it either. > > > > Any pointers? > > > > man ntpd > > has your answers. my /etc/ntp.conf looks like: > > server us.pool.ntp.org > server 0.pool.ntp.org > server 1.pool.ntp.org > driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift > us.pool.ntp.org is just a meta pointer to one of the servers in the us pool - so you could be pointing/asking 0.pool.ntp.org twice. Usually just us.pool.ntp.org is good enough. Unless your obsessive like me and list, 0,1,2 and 3.us.pool.ntp.org ++1 on http://www.pool.ntp.org/ -- great redundancy and you don't end up hard coding time servers that may go away or drop their public access. If you don't have your own cesium clock it's a cheap replacement . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 06:19:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D562916A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C4343D49 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:18:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so405350nfc for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:19:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=WukS0iHLv6xaDyjCf3kAQn3fv46KfSp+5h6FQNwDc4elXM3iFFwB55Ttsjlu7V+dMuZvUCXYvN9SgjOoiQN8/OqK9DB802+dBSATGupO2tPHMzCG4tEtWQLJx5IgAq6E/zbI/X3FVLhvFfyhEiny6c6n9L/QFCN1yPeC9f8c+Zc= Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr1174300bud.1164176353776; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:19:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.18 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:19:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5aaed53f0611212219k569a754am158e99c6157c6696@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:19:13 -0600 From: "Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T" Sender: dundeemt@gmail.com To: "Warren Block" In-Reply-To: <20061121180840.V31904@wonkity.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> <20061121162323.GB45815@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20061121180840.V31904@wonkity.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 43cc33d74485cbaa Cc: Jerry McAllister , questions@freebsd.org, rickie lyman Subject: Re: I don't see anything to answer my q X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:19:16 -0000 On 11/21/06, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > As far as I know, there are no freeware utilities that will do this > > for NTFS. The ones that come with FreeBSD will handle fat and fat32 > > just fine, but not NTFS. > > QTParted says it can resize NTFS: > > http://qtparted.sourceforge.net/features.en.html > > It's included on the System Rescue CD, as is Partimage, which can be > used to back up the partition before trying it: > > http://sysresccd.org > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Just finished this task myself this weekend on my laptop. You don't need to spend a dime in my opinion. Being a belt and suspender man, here is what I did: Backup ALL of your important docs/pics/files g4u - ghost for unix (Based on netbsd) http://www.feyrer.de/g4u/ Made a complete copy of my entire drive to another drive connected via USB -- see copydisk They have a live ISO that makes life nice. Perfect Disk - 30 day free trial http://www.raxco.com/products/downloadit/perfectdisk_download.cfm I used this to consolidate everything to the front of the drive giving me 28G on the back end. qtparted live cd http://qtparted.sourceforge.net/ After verifying my backup I used the live cd to resize my NTFS partition and created a 2GB swap and a 20G partition for the OS They have a live ISO that makes life nice. Here is where yours may differ as I was doing an installation of another OS (starts with a U) but the general directions are relevant. I installed it to the two new partitions, then I told it to write grub boot to the NEW OS root partition (in my case hda4 - known to grub as hd0,3) Then I dd off the the 1st 512 bytes of that drive(the boot sector) to a file(u#####.bin) on my usb thumb stick Then I copied the u####.bin file to my C:\ drive and updated the boot.ini and added another boot option Works just fine and no damage. Your biggest concern is what to do when the new boot loader wants to write to the 1st partition of the drive -- something you don't want if you want to use the W###### boot loader. My best piece of advice is to clone your current hard drive with g4u/copydisk and test it before proceeding further. It can save your bacon -- dual boots are hairy most times because everyone's compute is slightly different than the next persons. -- Jeff Hinrichs Dundee Media & Technology, Inc I write u##### and w###### because it would be heresy to mention any other OS by name on the FreeBSD list. It was utter curiosity with the u##### OS that lead me to try it. I am running FreeBSD 6.1 w/ gnome2 on the other workstations here at my house -- the lappy has my quickbooks I use for billing so it still has a pain in the a$$ os on it because the application dictates it. ;( Some day I'll be completely free of it. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 06:26:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D70A16A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [202.89.146.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1EC43D4C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1F1A156430; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:26:30 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:26:30 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Neil Short Message-ID: <20061122062630.GA95625@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <45634A59.3010707@mikestammer.com> <927899.71990.qm@web56512.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <927899.71990.qm@web56512.mail.re3.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD date drifts significantly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:26:31 -0000 On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 03:34:32PM -0800, Neil Short wrote: [...] > It seems that if I boot into windows, log in and enter > the windows time/date tool -- make no changes and > reboot into FreeBSD, the FreeBSD date will lurch > forward 10 to 12 hours. The CMOS date is still right. When you boot into Windows, it will attempt to set the CMOS time to local time by syncing to time-servers out on the 'Net. When you boot back into FreeBSD, and you've got the system set up to use CMOS at UTC, you will see the time lurch. Your options are to set up FreeBSD to use CMOS at local time or to ntpdate-sync at startup to NTP servers on the 'Net. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 06:45:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA81716A500 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EF743D68 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:44:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so411602nfc for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:45:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=OxWlexxOjLLVPjsoBMiIzZaEKO2p5ljrbQ6Vjw5lczm9KMkM3FACllSIqiKyOT19AoRLmRYS0jP+tiQo6YghkqcLF/Re9ueC+9kS9ffjOyGVxHe6ePntJzRYEMsJRLAUbW8EHs0D7/v1WWAPyGfKNbx/MaHvLSktcyVS+YpOIhs= Received: by 10.82.135.13 with SMTP id i13mr1182411bud.1164177916177; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:45:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.18 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:45:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5aaed53f0611212245v2f194531q569ab17a9bac1d6e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:45:15 -0600 From: "Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T" Sender: dundeemt@gmail.com To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <20061121225903.fswba3d1uss8wgos@secure.rem1tech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061121225903.fswba3d1uss8wgos@secure.rem1tech.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 80a145ee932674fb Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:45:23 -0000 On 11/21/06, Russell E. Meek wrote: > Quoting VeeJay : > > > Hi > > > > I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated. > > > > I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? > > > > I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single > > user mode and steal the data? > > How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in single user mode, it > > still demands the password and without password one cannot do anything? > > or make it possible that booting in Single user mode, doesn't provide any > > shell? > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > -- > > > > BR / vj > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > BR, > > Edit /etc/ttys and look for the following line: > > # If console is marked "insecure", then init will ask for the root password > # when going to single-user mode. > console none unknown off secure > > Change "secure" to "insecure" (no quotes) this will require the root > password to be entered when booting into Single User Mode. > > > Thanks, > > Russ > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If the box isn't physically secured then this is just blowin in the wind. Short of fully encrypted disks that require a token/password at boot, there isn't any security in this kind of environment. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 07:14:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219D016A415 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57805.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57805.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F86343D49 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:13:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 64118 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Nov 2006 07:14:17 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MnpDhXOY6ZJ3TfWpMuZtgVPEMDLPNVsdXqcHkLCCYaBiRW0VbdXPkhyM3OGksZvKKkW2kcwPBaJFG4qUb1rDconD/uCHHtQzVF4SHrbWXQnb+4kTvhaQCMlqSzqsKeWT2gK1WIYm75pAH4lDX+PRXnywKEoESSBnTZhVbG/KGM8= ; Message-ID: <20061122071417.64116.qmail@web57805.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.82.9.56] by web57805.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:14:17 PST Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:14:17 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Ezmlm Port Okay Or Junk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:14:19 -0000 105Hi;=0AOkay, I learned from sad experience and you all that the qmail por= t is junk. What about ezmlm? Same thing? Or good to go?=0ATIA,=0ARachel=0A= =0A=0A=0A=0A =0A___________________________________________________________= _________________________=0ASponsored Link=0A=0A$200,000 mortgage for $660/= mo=0A30/15 yr fixed, reduce debt=0Ahttp://yahoo.ratemarketplace.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 07:31:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3113916A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F72A43D49 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:30:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so423043nfc for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:30:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ch/I00qgivt/JgvnVJYZauUozbPUmI5geXjDyjWy9ivcxGsTnKHKtAi8OeO8oUAksT4l0HzFFUzdbkdtQewltfX9HNcecC85CI6YtOSxroIm5LfZKAcXfYWTSv9PClESgy5itPgb6FYlQ+U83ZEOg/XXyQpEZHfGad7A4CKjhnw= Received: by 10.78.181.13 with SMTP id d13mr7457047huf.1164180658736; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:30:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:30:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:30:58 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Rachel Florentine" In-Reply-To: <20061122071417.64116.qmail@web57805.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061122071417.64116.qmail@web57805.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6aa5347fe0857517 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ezmlm Port Okay Or Junk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:31:01 -0000 On 11/22/06, Rachel Florentine wrote: > 105Hi; > Okay, I learned from sad experience and you all > that the qmail port is junk. What about ezmlm? > Same thing? Or good to go? Didn't you know that /usr/ports is a big pile of junk? The problem is, we can't live without it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 07:45:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC2B16A4A7 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-237-189.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.237.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCA343D6D for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:45:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAM7jh2Q025149 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:45:43 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.7/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kAM7jhCA025146 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:45:43 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id HAA18428; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:12:38 GMT Message-Id: <200611220712.HAA18428@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:19:52 EST." <20061120111952.4213dacb.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:12:38 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:45:47 -0000 > I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if the disks > are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no > one process "blocks", but they're all a little slower. I collected a bit of data: While copying a large file from disk1 to disk2, time ls on a small directory on disk3 (not cached in memory) real 0m0.032s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.003s time ls on a small directory on disk2 real 4m51.911s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.002s I expect access to a busy disk to take longer, but 5 minutes is a bit much. And that's the root directory of the filesystem, it didn't have to follow a long chain of directories to get there. Sometimes I see long delays when accessing disk3, but it is behaving at the moment. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 09:03:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA7216A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E05E43D55 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:03:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=localhost.cpcnw.co.uk) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Gmo1D-0004ve-Kf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:03:47 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:04:06 -0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Graham Bentley" Organization: Custom PC North West Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061122073109.8714316A4FB@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20061122073109.8714316A4FB@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (FreeBSD) Subject: > Subject: Re: Ezmlm Port Okay Or Junk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:03:49 -0000 Can you expand on this ? I have noticed that quite alot of ports are broken on 6.2 but then again I only loaded it a few days ago and havent updated the tree (thinking this is the 'latest' version - flawed?) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 11:49:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E4716A407 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAD243D58 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:48:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so96819nzh for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:48:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.137.15 with SMTP id p15mr7141221qbn.1164196131880; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:48:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q13sm13659337qbq.2006.11.22.03.48.51; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:48:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64154BA69 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:48:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CB7B8EE for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:48:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:48:43 -0500 (EST) From: Gerard Seibert To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20061122064403.K16016@scorpio.seibercom.net> Organization: Seibercom.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: 'pkg_version' comparison failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gerard Seibert List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:49:00 -0000 What would cause this command: /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= to produce this error message: openoffice.org-2.0.3 ! Comparison failed I have updated the ports tree several times; however, the error remains. No other ports exhibits this phenomena. -- Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Beware of low-flying butterflies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 12:11:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162CA16A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF7243D68 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:10:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so100247nzh for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.219.5 with SMTP id w5mr7407424qbq.1164197460501; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z21sm13753143qbc.2006.11.22.04.10.59; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B98BA69; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:10:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C968B9D2; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:10:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:10:55 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: References: <231508.24266.qm@web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061122070915.69C5.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.28 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Upgrade Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:11:07 -0000 On Tuesday November 21, 2006 at 09:08:42 (PM) illoai@gmail.com wrote: > RELENG_6 for whatever 6-STABLE is (6.2 right now but will soon > enough be moving on towards 6.3.). I wasn't aware that 6.2 had been released as 'STABLE' yet. -- Gerard Mail from '@gmail' is rejected and/or discarded here. Don't waste your time! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 12:37:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E00616A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387F043D45 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:37:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.136] (helo=anti-virus01-07) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GmrM3-0002mh-Gt; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:37:31 +0000 Received: from [82.41.32.108] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GmrM2-0003Qs-Uh; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:37:30 +0000 Message-ID: <45644484.8040502@dial.pipex.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:37:24 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions References: <231508.24266.qm@web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <20061122070915.69C5.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20061122070915.69C5.GERARD@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Upgrade Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:37:34 -0000 Gerard Seibert wrote: >On Tuesday November 21, 2006 at 09:08:42 (PM) illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > > > >>RELENG_6 for whatever 6-STABLE is (6.2 right now but will soon >>enough be moving on towards 6.3.). >> >> > >I wasn't aware that 6.2 had been released as 'STABLE' yet. > > > Short version: No, the OP was correct. Long version: You've confused STABLE with RELEASE. 6.2 has not reached RELEASE. 6-STABLE is the latest "these changes worked fine in CURRENT (right now, aka 7) and have been MFCed (merged from current) so that more people can try them out", which right now corresponds to the version of FreeBSD that is just about to be released which also happens to be called 6.2-RC1 (release candidate 1)). When 6.2 is ready to go, a new RELEASE branch is created (6.2-RELEASE) which only gets security fixes. 6-STABLE then starts tracking 6.3, just as the OP said, though no 6.3 branch is created as such (iiuc). 6.3 tags start being created when enough worthwhile changes have been MFCed into 6-STABLE and the next release cycle is ready to start. Depressingly, the STABLE tag makes perfect sense once you grasp the branch structure that FreeBSD uses, but causes no end of confusion otherwise. STABLE in this context means "worked stably in the most up-to-date version of the source code that exists". It does not means "stable enough to use on production servers or other critical environments", though frequently it will be - just not always, as changes which worked for the limited number of people who run CURRENT machines, may break in more diverse environments when more people running STABLE try them. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 07:32:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F4416A417 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adelthea@yahoo.com) Received: from web90307.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web90307.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.100.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8166643D6E for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:32:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adelthea@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 68007 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Nov 2006 07:32:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sex7BFXMXFE3zJ8t3sYJBZGo6V2N1Qt7Tzb143IMvClYRB5QKrUrjyEGOpS+tsqH1yhHn2u7VlM+AYRQtTwrcH4GqUSPsi156i2qM3k66DainkOxes37x+kHPG+7Fd1EwJc6VOl1mHhZYBZ4RpeBNfQEQr8wplSMxKfGnXz4III= ; Message-ID: <20061122073229.68005.qmail@web90307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [222.124.127.80] by web90307.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:32:29 PST Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:32:29 -0800 (PST) From: alan ramlan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:43:45 +0000 Subject: ADI AD1888 AC'97 audio CODEC on ASUS P4P800S X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:32:33 -0000 give me driver sound ad1888 for P4P800S plese..... ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Online degrees - find the right program to advance your career. www.nextag.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 12:49:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AED16A4B3 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:49:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907EB43E82 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:44:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from db2.internal (db2.internal [10.202.2.12]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76BB3711 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:45:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by db2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:45:15 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: rI5c8rCG+oghq31iS52G7047yF15ZmmWV01GPQ4W982w 1164199515 Received: from gumby.localdomain (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA531447E for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:45:15 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:45:07 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061122064403.K16016@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20061122064403.K16016@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611221245.11425.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: 'pkg_version' comparison failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:49:06 -0000 On Wednesday 22 November 2006 11:48, Gerard Seibert wrote: > What would cause this command: > > /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= > > to produce this error message: > > openoffice.org-2.0.3 ! Comparison failed > > I have updated the ports tree several times; however, the error remains. > No other ports exhibits this phenomena. This port recently moved. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 13:53:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C927416A416 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:53:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A2943D5D for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:52:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so99072pyh for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 05:53:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=A84nZmOmRoSANbK8WsPotFQU36qzW3XfdJgfuYOJ4XnPX71CWwuU9FrZKphSGeFjomjSlgTffLLOIBMQINzvsArRhPCAzh+EpD3DUewi1OwyXDE7NLmqef5ROx3U2kJUyvvkhEqOr/hGPwdiTfoLL8i9O1EjkVHdkRxnqkJ8dNs= Received: by 10.35.94.7 with SMTP id w7mr1022552pyl.1164203588421; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 05:53:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 05:53:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611220553y5d56689es1468b949448bf1e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:53:08 +0100 From: VeeJay To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, maanjee@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: To which port GPG belongs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:53:10 -0000 Hi If I want to run commands like # gpg httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz.asc Which port one should install, becasue there are many... 1. /usr/ports/security/gnome-gpg 2. /usr/ports/security/gpgme03 3. /usr/ports/security/kgpg 4. /usr/ports/security/nofgpg 5. /usr/ports/security/ruby-gpgme And with which options one should install to have maximum security measure i.e. LDAP, CURL, etc -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 14:05:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B34416A416 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (atu120.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.2.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D1D43D6A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:04:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAME4xSA028167 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:05:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <45645904.8090108@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:04:52 +0100 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0611220553y5d56689es1468b949448bf1e6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611220553y5d56689es1468b949448bf1e6@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBECB7B8C59D602E48172E445" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2226/Wed Nov 22 13:28:56 2006 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: To which port GPG belongs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:05:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBECB7B8C59D602E48172E445 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/11/2006 14:53, VeeJay wrote: > Hi >=20 > If I want to run commands like >=20 >=20 > # gpg httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz.asc >=20 > Which port one should install, becasue there are many... /usr/ports/security/gnupg Btw, there's excellent documentation at http://www.gnupg.org/ > And with which options one should install to have maximum security meas= ure > i.e. LDAP, CURL, etc Take the defaults. You can add some functionality later, if required. HTH. Karol --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enigBECB7B8C59D602E48172E445 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFZFkLezeoPAwGIYsRCAwcAJ96feWs7wVmSMfCehvOSxKNhf6E/ACgpLV3 trdarA9R/pEEIgqcsWyX/s0= =eV+H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBECB7B8C59D602E48172E445-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 14:12:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6333C16A417 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahan@bol-online.com) Received: from mx1.dhaka.net (mx1.bol-online.com [202.84.44.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E046943D72 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:11:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahan@bol-online.com) Received: from [192.168.168.89] (ppp124.bol-online.com [202.84.34.134]) by mx1.dhaka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE1BD2F99 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:09:25 +0600 (BDT) Message-ID: <45645B58.8020906@bol-online.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:14:48 +0600 From: Aftab Jahan Subedar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4562CF3D.1070203@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <4562CF3D.1070203@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BOL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BOL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BOL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam X-MailScanner-From: jahan@bol-online.com Subject: Re: NIC driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:12:19 -0000 U can always add additional Intel/3COM NIC, in case the builtin card is not recognized. -- Aftab Jahan Subedar CEO/Software Engineer Subedar Technologies Ltd Soubedar Baag Bibir Bagicha #1 North Jatra Bari Dhaka 1204 Bangladesh http://www.DhakaStockExchangeGame.com Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hello > > I will receive in few days my new mail server the machine will > be an IBM X3650 bi xeon. > > I wonder what would be the "best" network interface to > plug in (if necessary) as I don't know for now what is > the builtin interfaces in this machine. > > To be clear I'm asking gurus on what is the "best FreeBSD supported" > NIC driver to avoid eventual perfomances problems. > > Thanks a lot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 14:18:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EBB16A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buebo@buebo.de) Received: from dd12538.kasserver.com (dd12538.kasserver.com [85.13.134.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A2043D46 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:17:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from buebo@buebo.de) Received: from gwen (reverse-82-141-61-17.dialin.kamp-dsl.de [82.141.61.17]) by dd12538.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DF217D7D for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:18:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:18:30 +0100 From: Felix 'buebo' Kakrow To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061122141830.GA22978@localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0611220553y5d56689es1468b949448bf1e6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611220553y5d56689es1468b949448bf1e6@mail.gmail.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.buebo.de/pub_key.asc X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: B615 F83E D46F 8C56 AE8E AC25 8772 8994 FFB4 FCFB User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Subject: Re: To which port GPG belongs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:18:27 -0000 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 22.11.06 14:53 schrieb VeeJay : > Hi >=20 > If I want to run commands like >=20 >=20 > # gpg httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz.asc >=20 > Which port one should install, becasue there are many... How about security/gnupg or security/gnupg-devel? I've never messed with the options on this one, but unless you want something very exotic (like encrypting living monkeys and storing them in MySQL Databases) there should be no need to. Regards, Felix --=20 If you love someone, set them free. If they don't come back, then call them up when you're drunk. --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Enrcypt your mail with GnuPG! iD8DBQFFZFw2h3KJlP+0/PsRAuxFAJ9fz/I/TlaYwxRKHJarq6zq97L9AwCfcUNN nfODoCWLO9SjmHju/BHPitE= =9K5U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 14:39:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FEF16A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E5643D46 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:38:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so154842uge for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:39:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=FRUEtOPnBN0I3ybzMRGtpvHoChHMhnj87y19J9eYbVp0BC6a0zM7CLpFLzkqSV3WS50Ht2Vwiq5eVshite3Ioub8UpJ3KfyNy8hoyiKdEX4fPWYiXvRe6XplFljufIoNrerXNiziOFSqJzaCwEQtBjZPeo19XH0eyBVZosuBE3k= Received: by 10.67.106.3 with SMTP id i3mr3096865ugm.1164206364899; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:39:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.106.17 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:39:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <226ae0c60611220639j1dae5331qeadfc60130c75aac@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:39:24 -0500 From: "David Robillard" To: DAve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Building Sendmail from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:39:27 -0000 [ ---8<--- Text has been removed! ---8<---] > But, where will the port install my *.mc and *.cf files? This I can't > seem to figure out. I would like to know before I hit 'make install' in > the port dir. I would think it will install them into > /usr/local/share/sendmail/cf, would that be correct? Hi DAve, When you use the mail/sendmail port, it does install files in /usr/local/share/sendmail. Think of it as the base system's sendmail files in /usr/share/sendmail. Now, the .mc and .cf files are still kept in /etc/mail and not in /usr/local/etc/mail as one could think by using a port. Note that you will find two scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d when you install the sendmail port. They are `sendmail.sh.sample' and `sm-client.sh.sample'. But you don't need to use them. The base system's /etc/rc.d/sendmail script handles both the base system's sendmail and the port's sendmail. The key for a pain free mail/sendmail ports usage is to do what you said. That is to edit make.conf(5) and to use special make(1) targets from the mail/sendmail's Makefile. Briefly, here's the way I do things when I update mail/sendmail (YMMV of course) sudo vi /etc/make.conf ## # mail/sendmail port configuration. ## # Do not build and install the base distribution of sendmail. # NO_SENDMAIL= TRUE # Specify where the configuration directory is located. # SENDMAIL_CF_DIR=/usr/local/share/sendmail/cf .if ${.CURDIR:M*/mail/sendmail} SENDMAIL_WITHOUT_IPV6=yes \ SENDMAIL_WITHOUT_NIS=yes \ SENDMAIL_WITH_TLS=yes \ SENDMAIL_WITH_SMTPS=yes \ SENDMAIL_WITH_LDAP=yes \ SENDMAIL_WITH_BERKELEYDB_VER=42 \ SENDMAIL_WITH_SOCKETMAP=yes \ SENDMAIL_WITH_PICKY_HELO_CHECK=yes \ SENDMAIL_WITH_SHARED_MILTER=yes .endif sudo porteasy -uv mail/sendmail sudo porteasy -uv security/openssl sudo porteasy -uv security/gnutls cd /usr/ports/mail/sendmail sudo make # -OR if you don't want to edit make.conf(5), you can run something like this: sudo make -DSENDMAIL_WITHOUT_IPV6 -DSENDMAIL_WITHOUT_NIS -DSENDMAIL_WITH_TLS -DSENDMAIL_WITH_SMTPS \ -DSENDMAIL_WITH_BERKELEYDB_VER=42 -DSENDMAIL_WITH_SOCKETMAP -DSENDMAIL_WITH_PICKY_HELO_CHECK -DSENDMAIL_WITH_SHARED_MILTER sudo make tls-install sudo make install sudo make mailer.conf sudo make clean Now, you might not need the exact same features of Sendmail as I do, of course. But the `make mailer.conf' is quite important. That's going to edit /etc/mail/mailer.conf which instructs the OS to use /usr/local/sbin/sendmail instead of the base system's sendmail. You don't have to change your PATH either. Why? Because if take a look at /usr/sbin/sendmail, it's not a binary, it's a symbolic link to `/usr/sbin/mailwrapper'. Just read the mailwrapper(8) man page and you'll understand how things work. > I want to make certain that when I build new sendmail.in.cf and > sendmail.out.cf the correct files are used by m4. Currently I run the > following when making changes to my *.mc files > > /usr/bin/m4 -D_CF_DIR_=/usr/share/sendmail/cf/ > /usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 sendmail.in.mc > sendmail.in.cf Take a look at the /etc/mail/Makefile and you'll see that it can determine your _CF_DIR_. But it takes a wrong decision. It uses either /usr/share/sendmail/cf or /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/cf. To work around this, you can edit /etc/mail/Makefile or use the following at the top of your sendmail.mc files: dnl include. dnl Use the following m4 macro file. dnl include(`/usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl That's it. If you need any help, don't hesitate to contact me. Have fun :) David -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Security Administrator Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 14:45:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FE216A506 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6606D43DAC for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:44:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so156393uge for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:45:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=MpcRwd/R0ZHEfPaRPI/DMTVB/kocrtl2ihv+gvoxaoCMzIUTdG+ZNr0znBp9JCpGBCo2OD8JMj32qCOr+RYvmZ42J24H/XLCrsWbexluh/muHaZ68kuLDREGJHYsXPULmrTGNI4uBrK3niV6QRfkesHwgEEO4lx55aRGM4W0U4k= Received: by 10.82.120.15 with SMTP id s15mr1243561buc.1164206714413; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:45:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.18 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:45:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5aaed53f0611220645n7b16fa53x81232f44d5197013@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:45:14 -0600 From: "Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T" Sender: dundeemt@gmail.com To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611220549i1fe5d6dekc51e0aa0eda13ec2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061121225903.fswba3d1uss8wgos@secure.rem1tech.com> <5aaed53f0611212245v2f194531q569ab17a9bac1d6e@mail.gmail.com> <2cd0a0da0611220549i1fe5d6dekc51e0aa0eda13ec2@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2797af4fedd62bde Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:45:38 -0000 Although I haven't used either, gbde and geli are possible methods. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-encrypting.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 14:49:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF72416A415 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C4243D90 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:48:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so128483nzh for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:48:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=czAqqTm4nPJ/U8JlqXETacCElamg/fSIElGUlqNl3VOAC9W77B39J52kGc16wfVQEAn2iBYlj43Is8OuNZEZmgCk3KydckRVMqkF8Oxl6K6irRf0Sb+JD6bWoBGcd4Gl6jR8gi5XtAxEgCRpT2VC2nMp8cPCyh59Ogvu5J3U/+o= Received: by 10.35.100.6 with SMTP id c6mr1123173pym.1164206899023; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:48:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:48:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611220648g6b639930gf82fea1497e52b04@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:48:18 +0100 From: VeeJay To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org In-Reply-To: <45645904.8090108@orchid.homeunix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611220553y5d56689es1468b949448bf1e6@mail.gmail.com> <45645904.8090108@orchid.homeunix.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: To which port GPG belongs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:49:22 -0000 Thanks for your quick thoughts... I am still unable to verify Key I have got this key from Apache site -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUARMj7lvcTqHkQ/eB1AQKApAgAjnO4vMS0hmJc7FI/X/qT5L9ZmwZpZFLW uFFlLCOlRNluQ4e+Y+a9lIlbvkhGATWC4ukDSa4EEuVa/Bs6rgDFm0jJW8c+pjG7 NybvXIfVl2bmUI2LJPAJsAYm3vhThvPROVLuTg6FawCTAdjGrMli2gJQmNdw++Lk CzntFbrQajaZCV2Tc1wMOOzKFM7jPvgxAla9vd0tfRVAdMZQfz2BXGF0Nis7cd7i QmgdeExfKlQehJ3kf09z8td07IuXmxxg5Z3ktB3SNnKo8MclNcbUlDwiAM8ePieG pfGV1TQqHd+CvfRn/MoS5Sl74GtpXw0vgr4/A1ZjoTw3OM9x+cYHSQ== =JQal -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- but how to verify because.... When I give this command # gpg httpd-2.0.59.tar.gz.asc gpg: Signature made Thu Jul 27 19:44:54 2006 CEST using RSA key ID 10FDE075 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found # What to do... please help!!! On 11/22/06, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: > > On 22/11/2006 14:53, VeeJay wrote: > > Hi > > > > If I want to run commands like > > > > > > # gpg httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz.asc > > > > Which port one should install, becasue there are many... > > /usr/ports/security/gnupg > > Btw, there's excellent documentation at http://www.gnupg.org/ > > > > And with which options one should install to have maximum security > measure > > i.e. LDAP, CURL, etc > > Take the defaults. You can add some functionality later, if required. > > HTH. > > Karol > > -- > Karol Kwiatkowski > OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc > > > > -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 14:50:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA62F16A599 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.kobal@arctur.si) Received: from cygnus.arctur.si (cygnus.arctur.si [193.77.181.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412F043D98 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:49:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko.kobal@arctur.si) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by cygnus.arctur.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FD1CB6823 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:50:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from cygnus.arctur.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cygnus.arctur.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97931-01 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:50:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (BSN-77-124-79.dsl.siol.net [193.77.124.79]) by cygnus.arctur.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC192CB681D for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:50:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <456463B3.3050005@arctur.si> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:50:27 +0100 From: Marko Kobal User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0650-0, 22.11.2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at arctur.si Subject: additional processor in IBM xSeries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:50:52 -0000 Hi, I have an IBM xSeries 225 with two-processor motherboard, currently with only one Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. OS is 6.1p10, otherwise is this an apache22-mysql50-php5 web server. I would like to add an additional, second Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. Do I have to change anything in OS, kernel, etc, before this step or can I just plug in the additional proc and thats it? -- Kind regards, Marko Kobal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 14:52:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7AB16A415 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:52:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from th.lacoste@wanadoo.fr) Received: from ultra1.univ-paris12.fr (ultra1.univ-paris12.fr [193.51.100.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13D343D82 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th.lacoste@wanadoo.fr) Received: from st-simon.miage.univ-paris12.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra1.univ-paris12.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAMEof1g018286 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:50:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from sirius.miage.univ-paris12.fr (sirius.miage.univ-paris12.fr [194.214.13.28]) by st-simon.miage.univ-paris12.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F6847281A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:50:41 +0100 (CET) From: Thierry Lacoste To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:50:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611221550.40239.th.lacoste@wanadoo.fr> Subject: problems with check_dhcp in nagios X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:52:30 -0000 Hello, I'm using nagios-2.4 with nagios-plugins-1.4.3,1 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10. I have a problem to make check_dhcp work. dhclient works as expected: [root@rigel ~]# dhclient em0 DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPDISCOVER on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 DHCPDISCOVER on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8 DHCPOFFER from 194.214.13.3 DHCPOFFER from 194.214.13.2 DHCPOFFER already seen. DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPACK from 194.214.13.3 bound to 194.214.13.6 -- renewal in 21600 seconds. But check_dhcp doesn't work (with dhclient killed): [root@rigel ~]# /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_dhcp -i em0 -v DHCP socket: 3 Hardware address: 000d56bd84c5 DHCPDISCOVER to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPDISCOVER XID: 1804289383 (0x6B8B4567) DHCDISCOVER ciaddr: 0.0.0.0 DHCDISCOVER yiaddr: 0.0.0.0 DHCDISCOVER siaddr: 0.0.0.0 DHCDISCOVER giaddr: 0.0.0.0 send_dhcp_packet result: 548 No (more) data received Result=ERROR Total responses seen on the wire: 0 Valid responses for this machine: 0 DHCP problem: No DHCPOFFERs were received. The -s switch to specify the IP of a DHCP server doesn't help. Using ethereal I can see one "DHCP Discover" packet sent and nothing else. I don't know if it is relevant but I noticed that the source adress of this packet is the IP of the machine while the source address of "DHCP Discover" packets issued by dhclient is 0.0.0.0. Any tip would be appreciated. Regards, Thierry. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 15:04:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E8A16A50D for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7980743D73 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:04:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so131801nzh for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:04:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=eMrevOi5Rrc4VOWIg41XBDmb5CYsOttW2XedCDjZRAvv33je8fy+Mufoy6nBkCkUqjD89Ig+DxqlJSvjzaHuWr2hUT0bQx30O3BXiw67Ki1Ncq9wXy7s8PoMmZrqGcS71DE1wA2zYhKwLDq8XhPLY4tF2Fr8aV+MqdbJqVjguyI= Received: by 10.35.96.7 with SMTP id y7mr1152155pyl.1164207891689; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:04:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:04:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611220704vca1718w3427551d57f3a702@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:04:51 +0100 From: VeeJay To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org In-Reply-To: <45645904.8090108@orchid.homeunix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611220553y5d56689es1468b949448bf1e6@mail.gmail.com> <45645904.8090108@orchid.homeunix.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: To which port GPG belongs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:04:54 -0000 I have this Help Instructions from a Step-by-Step for Apache installation lynx http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi gpg --import KEYS gpg httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz.asc gpg: Good signature from "Sander Striker " tar zxvf httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz this doesn't work either.... gpg --import KEYS On 11/22/06, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: > > On 22/11/2006 14:53, VeeJay wrote: > > Hi > > > > If I want to run commands like > > > > > > # gpg httpd-2.0.49.tar.gz.asc > > > > Which port one should install, becasue there are many... > > /usr/ports/security/gnupg > > Btw, there's excellent documentation at http://www.gnupg.org/ > > > > And with which options one should install to have maximum security > measure > > i.e. LDAP, CURL, etc > > Take the defaults. You can add some functionality later, if required. > > HTH. > > Karol > > -- > Karol Kwiatkowski > OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc > > > > -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 15:07:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A290516A494 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aharrison@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216DB43D69 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:07:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aharrison@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so162444uge for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:07:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=kCyTfVgGmLwsurzyngy+4Io3gzK9rSoLbXzZXpEIe6W411jeoT4u2l1nNZ+GQItG03uzBNokWVwoDULzmlT5hbSSThfAeBBnXyZkhuGCZLh66Bdzk0l2bMf2nRAQPPWSLFl4AH47/nX6HS6aUuQ/GAfoyDr9uTQPy/xpuT2rovE= Received: by 10.78.157.8 with SMTP id f8mr7898980hue.1164208064259; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:07:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.176.14 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:07:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:07:44 -0500 From: "Andy Harrison" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: linux-sun-jdk15, Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:07:50 -0000 I'm trying to install jdk15 because I need it to access the ilom on some Sun x4100 boxes. Has anyone else seen or know how to handle this error message? I tried both bash and tcsh with a clean env just to see if that might be mucking something up. No luck... # make -D DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES extract ====================================================================== Warning: This JDK may be unstable. You are advised to use the native FreeBSD 1.5 JDK, in ports/java/jdk15. This Java VM will attempt to obtain some system information by accessing files in linux's procfs. You must install the Linux emulation procfs filesystem for this to work correctly. The JVM will exhibit various problems otherwise. This can be accomplished by adding the following line to your /etc/fstab file: linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 and then, as root, executing the commands: kldload linprocfs mount /compat/linux/proc ====================================================================== ===> Extracting for linux-sun-jdk-1.5.0.09 => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin. => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin. ===> linux-sun-jdk-1.5.0.09 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release - found /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15/work/install.sfx: 1: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 and I already have linux-firefox-2.0 working well with linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.12. And as of yesterday, all my ports are current. Any suggestions? -- Andy Harrison From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 15:15:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F086016A417 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B4343D6E for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:14:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so110594pyh for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:15:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=K0z8AgBkFDbkyryLcLbz909mvYlGiO2Ar5jpw5MENuyCfprSfIC3FlJX1KULXbqvzS0ijEdR6MqzgFyGlFtJQAOSpRdr0LiDJfa6nqyWTdMeF2NsV4TQPMj5XWCR4mRwDwEuY7wVC13i/GsWqt4Ednu7tn6pTixBkd1pb7pPXeU= Received: by 10.35.125.16 with SMTP id c16mr1468737pyn.1164208516142; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:15:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:15:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611220715n7e88564ahe19f20d033ed39a9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:15:16 +0100 From: VeeJay To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, maanjee@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Does disk encryption causes a performance penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:15:29 -0000 Hi Does *disk encryption* causes a *performance* penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc? -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 15:27:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5DA16A416 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E9F43D6E for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:26:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gmu04-000Mr6-HB; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:27:00 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gmu0X-0002N7-Ks; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:27:29 +0300 To: "Andy Harrison" References: From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:27:29 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Andy Harrison's message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:07:44 -0500") Message-ID: <47316894@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: linux-sun-jdk15, Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:27:03 -0000 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:07:44 -0500 Andy Harrison wrote: > I'm trying to install jdk15 because I need it to access the ilom on > some Sun x4100 boxes. Has anyone else seen or know how to handle this > error message? I tried both bash and tcsh with a clean env just to > see if that might be mucking something up. No luck... > # make -D DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES extract > ====================================================================== > Warning: This JDK may be unstable. You are advised to use the native > FreeBSD 1.5 JDK, in ports/java/jdk15. > This Java VM will attempt to obtain some system information by > accessing files in linux's procfs. You must install the Linux > emulation procfs filesystem for this to work correctly. The JVM > will exhibit various problems otherwise. This can be accomplished > by adding the following line to your /etc/fstab file: > linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 > and then, as root, executing the commands: > kldload linprocfs > mount /compat/linux/proc > ====================================================================== > ===> Extracting for linux-sun-jdk-1.5.0.09 > => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin. > ===> linux-sun-jdk-1.5.0.09 depends on file: > /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release - found > /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15/work/install.sfx: 1: Syntax error: > word unexpected (expecting ")") > *** Error code 2 > Stop in /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15. > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 and I already have > linux-firefox-2.0 working well with linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.12. And as of > yesterday, all my ports are current. > Any suggestions? You didn't mention if by a chance you did follow those instructions about linprocfs... WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 15:30:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A57416A50C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F031243D53 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:30:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:30:40 -0500 id 000564CB.45646D20.00000729 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Nov 2006 10:30:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:30:38 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: VeeJay Message-Id: <20061122103038.758d313c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611220715n7e88564ahe19f20d033ed39a9@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0611220715n7e88564ahe19f20d033ed39a9@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does disk encryption causes a performance penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:30:43 -0000 In response to VeeJay : > > Does *disk encryption* causes a *performance* penalty for Data > Access/Read/Write, etc? Any kind of encryption causes a performance penalty. However, if your CPU is powerful enough, it's possible (even likely) that the CPU is still able to encrypt faster than the disk can write the data. The result would be that you won't notice the penalty unless you've got other CPU-intensive tasks running that reduce the amount of CPU available to the encryption process. HTH -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 15:37:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DDF16A4FB for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945CF43D5D for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:36:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so537305nfc for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:37:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EyMAkzapC5kgLAiK1sa5b0viW0GJvT4StbGZaKRyiEXNQD/sYwyIk5GXr66B4cYT8XaOnTi+cEl4kxMPotcQWoX4jUBM4P/kAHVMPpCdLH8Ua34awVD2c/RsC0wjZetc9SCBwm9MwgKzjxJXBPxhb7fJJLOmqAvJhObVQ0lYV/U= Received: by 10.82.164.9 with SMTP id m9mr1257772bue.1164209833000; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:37:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.174.13 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:37:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:37:12 -0700 From: "Nick Pavlica" To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611220715n7e88564ahe19f20d033ed39a9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd0a0da0611220715n7e88564ahe19f20d033ed39a9@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does disk encryption causes a performance penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:37:17 -0000 > Does *disk encryption* causes a *performance* penalty for Data > Access/Read/Write, etc? I haven't done any testing, but would assume that it would impact it to a certain degree, because there is the additional encryption overhead. --Nick Pavlica From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 15:41:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2389816A4C9 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:41:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (atu120.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.2.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E195043D8A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:40:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAMFeich033221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:40:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <45646F75.5090808@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:40:37 +0100 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0611220553y5d56689es1468b949448bf1e6@mail.gmail.com> <45645904.8090108@orchid.homeunix.org> <2cd0a0da0611220648g6b639930gf82fea1497e52b04@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611220648g6b639930gf82fea1497e52b04@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1834767C90C06C0A3C930D3B" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2228/Wed Nov 22 14:37:52 2006 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: To which port GPG belongs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:41:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1834767C90C06C0A3C930D3B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/11/2006 15:48, VeeJay wrote: > Thanks for your quick thoughts... >=20 > I am still unable to verify Key >=20 > I have got this key from Apache site >=20 >=20 [ key snipped ] > but how to verify because.... >=20 > When I give this command >=20 > # gpg httpd-2.0.59.tar.gz.asc > gpg: Signature made Thu Jul 27 19:44:54 2006 CEST using RSA key ID 10FD= E075 > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > # You don't have public key 0x10FDE075 in your keyring. You can either download it from one of keyservers or form apache site: $ fetch http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/KEYS KEYS 100% of 295 kB 108 kBps $ gpg --import KEYS gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information [...] gpg: key 10FDE075: public key [email] imported [...] gpg: Total number processed: 58 gpg: w/o user IDs: 4 gpg: imported: 52 (RSA: 24) gpg: unchanged: 2 gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, classic trust model gpg: depth: 0 valid: 1 signed: 4 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u gpg: depth: 1 valid: 4 signed: 0 trust: 4-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 0u Then you can verify (here I'm verifying 1.3 version): $ gpg --verify apache_1.3.37.tar.gz.asc pathto/apache_1.3.37.tar.gz gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information gpg: Signature made Thu 27 Jul 20:35:51 2006 CEST using RSA key ID 10FDE075 gpg: Good signature from "[email] [...] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 33 16 9B 46 FC 12 D4 01 CA 6D DB D7 DE EA 4F D7= Be sure you read that last fat WARNING. It says the signature is correct but my gnupg doesn't know if the key used to sign is trusted. In reality that means I don't really know to whom the key really belongs.= HTH, but it you really want to use gnupg you should at least read "Getting started"[1] form GnuPG site. Without understanding where it all can fail you won't gain anything. Regards, Karol [1] http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#INTRO --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enig1834767C90C06C0A3C930D3B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFZG98ezeoPAwGIYsRCBSSAKCFlpB3hDCpIW/rUeFoYgIx7b+FWwCgn5Ij clZs0xDEu2DXy0VcoXGSqyY= =v9G5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1834767C90C06C0A3C930D3B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 15:48:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A4A16A492 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3240F43D53 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:47:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so173313uge for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:48:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=K/Up4srhzoJVSPqQJnIuPMpgzPovs/HoDSyZWzTOI9QqFgiZtnRjk3syMDagGAycVS/IUvTEjHJHjN84MSWtKt2JdAkYovPsugglKe4GFk8kI1dqRfmM4viIc+eB6qy7agdf3BodiDrwjSLLZKHF/Y8Szb2LDuyyNs0u3HnLmco= Received: by 10.78.204.20 with SMTP id b20mr7927419hug.1164210500787; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.139.10 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:48:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3ee9ca710611220748n58ef394v2d7f78dcf59fc462@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:48:20 -0500 From: "Andy Greenwood" To: "Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T" In-Reply-To: <5aaed53f0611220645n7b16fa53x81232f44d5197013@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061121225903.fswba3d1uss8wgos@secure.rem1tech.com> <5aaed53f0611212245v2f194531q569ab17a9bac1d6e@mail.gmail.com> <2cd0a0da0611220549i1fe5d6dekc51e0aa0eda13ec2@mail.gmail.com> <5aaed53f0611220645n7b16fa53x81232f44d5197013@mail.gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions , VeeJay Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:48:26 -0000 I've used geli to encrypt my swap partition following the instructions in the handbook and it went quite well. If you really need to secure the data on the machine, mark the terminal as insecure and encrypt all the disks, including swap. Keep in mind though, that no system is completely secure. It may be secure enough, but there is *always* a way in for the determined individual. On 11/22/06, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T wrote: > Although I haven't used either, gbde and geli are possible methods. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-encrypting.html > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 15:59:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6ED16A407 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aharrison@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C3F43D68 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:58:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aharrison@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so176091uge for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:58:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=socWz15QllVy/HQNO5crldD6VDOG5ipYsQKHZDngr3hHa2i9eFw21Krsgeen3XT0htFN+vY6+6GHXLvvDDEMazB8EW8eKkQAWTa+u83GuCDFglG1P299uYwqhrcp7Z5pos8iIKJcH/CdKQWeZ6oIAxm9sJBzsEV8QyIf0KBpTww= Received: by 10.78.41.3 with SMTP id o3mr7892135huo.1164211138178; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:58:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.176.14 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:58:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:58:58 -0500 From: "Andy Harrison" To: "Boris Samorodov" In-Reply-To: <47316894@srv.sem.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47316894@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: linux-sun-jdk15, Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:59:01 -0000 On 11/22/06, Boris Samorodov wrote: > You didn't mention if by a chance you did follow those instructions > about linprocfs... > Yes, it's mounted. # grep lin /etc/fstab linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 # mount | grep lin linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) -- Andy Harrison From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 15:59:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C693216A506 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:59:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA5E43D72 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:58:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 17919 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2006 15:59:15 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Nov 2006 15:59:15 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1A93828430; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:59:14 -0500 (EST) To: Laurence Sanford References: <45626DE3.9040507@wilderness.homeip.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:59:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <45626DE3.9040507@wilderness.homeip.net> (Laurence Sanford's message of "Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:09:23 -0600") Message-ID: <448xi3fp66.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox build error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:59:17 -0000 Laurence Sanford writes: > Firefox build from ports is exiting with this error: > > cc -o gtk2xtbin.o -c -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD6\" > -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -DBUILD_ID=0000000000 -D_IMPL_GTKXTBIN_API > -DUSE_XIM -I../../../dist/include/xpcom > -I../../../dist/include/gtkxtbin -I../../../dist/include > -I/usr/local/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include > -I/usr/include -I../../../dist/sdk/include -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include > -fPIC -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include > -Wall -W -Wno-unused -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wno-long-long -O2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe > -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O2 -DXTHREADS -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API > -I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/include > -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/cairo > -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include > -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include > -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include > -include ../../../mozilla-config.h -DMOZILLA_CLIENT gtk2xtbin.c > In file included from gtk2xtbin.h:44, > from gtk2xtbin.c:46: > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1181: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1325: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1392: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1399: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1423: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1475: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1498: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1572: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1593: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1604: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1615: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1630: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1645: error: syntax error before > "_X_SENTINEL" > gtk2xtbin.c:188: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type > gtk2xtbin.c: In function `xt_client_create': > gtk2xtbin.c:566: warning: implicit declaration of function > XtVaCreateWidget' > gtk2xtbin.c:568: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer > without a cast > gmake[2]: *** [gtk2xtbin.o] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/widget/src/gtkxtbin' > gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' > gmake: *** [default] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. > > I figure something is out of date, but I've updated xorg and gtk20 and > I'm still getting this. Any pointers? Thanks in advance. Did you do the Gnome-stuff update described in UPDATING last month? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 16:16:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74ADE16A505 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E7243D45 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:15:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAMGEO48050995; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:14:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kAMGEOGM050994; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:14:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:14:24 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: "illoai@gmail.com" Message-ID: <20061122161424.GA50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <9ec7836e0611201838k3724fa2cub2144a4275530fe0@mail.gmail.com> <20061121162323.GB45815@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: rickie lyman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I don't see anything to answer my question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:16:08 -0000 On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 07:05:53PM -0600, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 11/21/06, Jerry McAllister wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 09:38:26PM -0500, rickie lyman wrote: > > > >> I am a newbee and sometimes Dizzy too. My question is I have a computer > >that > >> has a rather large drive but it is all formated in NTFs and yes it has XP > >> Pro on it how would I be able to put Free BSD on there without loosing > >the > >> files I have with the other operating system?? I told you that I was > >> confused. > > > >First, is there plenty of empty space on that disk. If you have > >used up all the space with something, then you can't do it on that > >disk. You will have to add one. > > > >But, more than likely, you haven't used up the space - there is probably > >lots, more than half still unfilled. So, then, no problem. > > > >You will have to use some utility to shrink the existing NTFS file > >system on the drive. > > > >As far as I know, there are no freeware utilities that will do this > >for NTFS. The ones that come with FreeBSD will handle fat and fat32 > >just fine, but not NTFS. > > A quick Gogol* led me to this: > > http://www.linuxmigration.com/quickref/install/disk.html > > Which mentions Man-drake 9.1 (& therfor is of dubious > currency: http://www.mandriva.com/ ), though one might > assume that many of thee Torvaldsians's so-called "distros" > might do similarly. In other words: try a linux live CD/DVD. > > I would try knoppix, because I have a CD, except that I do > not have an NTFS anything handy to test it myself. > > Otherwise, McAllister's writeup is sound, sane, and probably > as in-depth as you can hope for. Thanks. > > *http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=resize+ntfs Mentions various Linux ways to do it, but I suspect that the poster who wants to install FreeBSD might not be interested in first installing some Linux - which would take some partition manipulation and then doing the FreeBSD install. Of course, maybe he can set up a SUSE live CD and do it. I think Suse might also claim to be able to do the resizing during install. But, that still means doing two systems to get one. Is that better than getting a cheap utility -- maybe, who knows. Google also pops up an add for 'Partition Commander 10 which claims to be able to resize NTFS on a live system even without even a reboot. It's price seems to be $10 or $20 less than Partition Magic so it might be interesting, but I haven't used it so can't verify. ////jerry > -- > -- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 16:24:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E019116A416 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650B743D5D for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:23:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAMGMhfG051039; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:22:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kAMGMhh9051038; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:22:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:22:43 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Robert Davison Message-ID: <20061122162243.GB50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <231508.24266.qm@web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <231508.24266.qm@web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:24:27 -0000 On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:34:23AM +0000, Robert Davison wrote: > If my cvs-upfile reads, and specfically im looking at the default release line.... > > *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > src-all > ports-all tag=. > doc-all tag=. > > Can anyone tell me what release and branch of FreeBSD im tracking. its > a 6.1 system. I'm asking as I will soon be testing the waters with > Buildworld and mergemaster etc to get to 6.2. What would the default > release= change to then ? if 'cvs' is tracking the 6.1 branch ????? I think you need another line to tell it what branch to track. Here is my file that tracks 6.1. Take off the '_1' part off of the RELENG_6_1 to make it just RELENG_6 and you can track the latest of 6.xxx, whatever it is at the moment. *default host=cvsup.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default tag=RELENG_6_1 *default release=cvs *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 16:27:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA10416A412 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135B243D45 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:27:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gmuwp-000N6y-L7; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:27:43 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GmuxI-0002Rr-UN; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:28:12 +0300 To: "Andy Harrison" References: From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:28:12 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Andy Harrison's message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:07:44 -0500") Message-ID: <15153251@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: linux-sun-jdk15, Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:27:46 -0000 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:07:44 -0500 Andy Harrison wrote: > I'm trying to install jdk15 because I need it to access the ilom on > some Sun x4100 boxes. Has anyone else seen or know how to handle this > error message? I tried both bash and tcsh with a clean env just to > see if that might be mucking something up. No luck... > # make -D DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES extract > ====================================================================== > Warning: This JDK may be unstable. You are advised to use the native > FreeBSD 1.5 JDK, in ports/java/jdk15. > This Java VM will attempt to obtain some system information by > accessing files in linux's procfs. You must install the Linux > emulation procfs filesystem for this to work correctly. The JVM > will exhibit various problems otherwise. This can be accomplished > by adding the following line to your /etc/fstab file: > linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 > and then, as root, executing the commands: > kldload linprocfs > mount /compat/linux/proc > ====================================================================== > ===> Extracting for linux-sun-jdk-1.5.0.09 > => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin. > ===> linux-sun-jdk-1.5.0.09 depends on file: Where did you get the version 1.5.0.09? I checked out cvsweb, and there is 1.5.0.07. > /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release - found > /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15/work/install.sfx: 1: Syntax error: > word unexpected (expecting ")") > *** Error code 2 > Stop in /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15. > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 and I already have > linux-firefox-2.0 working well with linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.12. And as of > yesterday, all my ports are current. > Any suggestions? WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 16:44:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A260916A585 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:44:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFA9440FD for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:34:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAMGXHNw051090; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:33:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kAMGXH8F051089; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:33:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:33:17 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: VeeJay Message-ID: <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:44:48 -0000 On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:41:37AM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated. > > I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? > > I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single > user mode and steal the data? > How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in single user mode, it > still demands the password and without password one cannot do anything? > or make it possible that booting in Single user mode, doesn't provide any > shell? Lock it in a box. Anyone who can put their hands physically can get in to the machine with a little tinkering even if you disable lots of software. I think you can get rid of the single user option in the boot, but anyone with a CD can defeat that if they want to. It would make things harder for yourself in managing the system, but it would slow a person down from casual interference. Also, many machines have BIOS level boot passwords that can be turned on. Using that would slow a person down, but be annoying for youself, especially in times such as power failures - the system would not come back up automatically without someone entering the BIOS password. Plus, if a person is determined enough, they can defeat that as well by removing the battery backup for the MB or the flash memory. But, it would stop casual tinkering. ////jerry > > Thanks in advance > > -- > > BR / vj > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 16:45:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EF416A86A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:45:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster5.tls.net (ecluster5.tls.net [65.196.224.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B807441DD for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:37:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 17016 invoked by uid 89); 22 Nov 2006 16:32:59 -0000 Received: from 208-70-40-179.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.40.179) by auth-ecluster5.tls.net with SMTP; 22 Nov 2006 16:32:59 -0000 Message-ID: <45647CF6.1050504@pixelhammer.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:38:14 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <226ae0c60611220639j1dae5331qeadfc60130c75aac@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <226ae0c60611220639j1dae5331qeadfc60130c75aac@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Building Sendmail from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:45:20 -0000 David Robillard wrote: > [ ---8<--- Text has been removed! ---8<---] > >> But, where will the port install my *.mc and *.cf files? This I can't >> seem to figure out. I would like to know before I hit 'make install' in >> the port dir. I would think it will install them into >> /usr/local/share/sendmail/cf, would that be correct? > > Hi DAve, > > When you use the mail/sendmail port, it does install files in > /usr/local/share/sendmail. Think of it as the base system's sendmail > files in /usr/share/sendmail. As I expected. > > Now, the .mc and .cf files are still kept in /etc/mail and not in > /usr/local/etc/mail as one could think by using a port. Got that from reading the make files, good to confirm. > > Note that you will find two scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d when you > install the sendmail port. They are `sendmail.sh.sample' and > `sm-client.sh.sample'. But you don't need to use them. The base > system's /etc/rc.d/sendmail script handles both the base system's > sendmail and the port's sendmail. I use a custom rc script already due to my split config. > > The key for a pain free mail/sendmail ports usage is to do what you > said. That is to edit make.conf(5) and to use special make(1) targets > from the mail/sendmail's Makefile. > > Briefly, here's the way I do things when I update mail/sendmail (YMMV of > course) > > sudo vi /etc/make.conf > > ## > # mail/sendmail port configuration. > ## > > # Do not build and install the base distribution of sendmail. > # > NO_SENDMAIL= TRUE > > # Specify where the configuration directory is located. > # > SENDMAIL_CF_DIR=/usr/local/share/sendmail/cf > > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/mail/sendmail} > SENDMAIL_WITHOUT_IPV6=yes \ > SENDMAIL_WITHOUT_NIS=yes \ > SENDMAIL_WITH_TLS=yes \ > SENDMAIL_WITH_SMTPS=yes \ > SENDMAIL_WITH_LDAP=yes \ > SENDMAIL_WITH_BERKELEYDB_VER=42 \ > SENDMAIL_WITH_SOCKETMAP=yes \ > SENDMAIL_WITH_PICKY_HELO_CHECK=yes \ > SENDMAIL_WITH_SHARED_MILTER=yes > .endif > > sudo porteasy -uv mail/sendmail > sudo porteasy -uv security/openssl > sudo porteasy -uv security/gnutls > > cd /usr/ports/mail/sendmail > > sudo make > # -OR if you don't want to edit make.conf(5), you can run something like > this: > sudo make -DSENDMAIL_WITHOUT_IPV6 -DSENDMAIL_WITHOUT_NIS > -DSENDMAIL_WITH_TLS -DSENDMAIL_WITH_SMTPS \ > -DSENDMAIL_WITH_BERKELEYDB_VER=42 -DSENDMAIL_WITH_SOCKETMAP > -DSENDMAIL_WITH_PICKY_HELO_CHECK -DSENDMAIL_WITH_SHARED_MILTER > > sudo make tls-install > sudo make install > sudo make mailer.conf > sudo make clean > > Now, you might not need the exact same features of Sendmail as I do, > of course. But the `make mailer.conf' is quite important. That's going > to edit /etc/mail/mailer.conf which instructs the OS to use > /usr/local/sbin/sendmail instead of the base system's sendmail. You > don't have to change your PATH either. Saw that in the Makefile. > > Why? Because if take a look at /usr/sbin/sendmail, it's not a binary, > it's a symbolic link to `/usr/sbin/mailwrapper'. Just read the > mailwrapper(8) man page and you'll understand how things work. Yep. > >> I want to make certain that when I build new sendmail.in.cf and >> sendmail.out.cf the correct files are used by m4. Currently I run the >> following when making changes to my *.mc files >> >> /usr/bin/m4 -D_CF_DIR_=/usr/share/sendmail/cf/ >> /usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 sendmail.in.mc > sendmail.in.cf > > Take a look at the /etc/mail/Makefile and you'll see that it can > determine your _CF_DIR_. But it takes a wrong decision. It uses either > /usr/share/sendmail/cf or /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/cf. Previously I didn't want to change the installed Makefile in /etc/mail, I likely will now. > > To work around this, you can edit /etc/mail/Makefile or use the > following at the top of your sendmail.mc files: > > dnl include. > dnl Use the following m4 macro file. > dnl > include(`/usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl Excellent idea! > > That's it. If you need any help, don't hesitate to contact me. > > Have fun :) I appreciate the heads up, thanks! DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 16:45:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66E216A94C; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290DF43D90; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:43:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAMGfhb4051127; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:41:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kAMGfhUU051126; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:41:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:41:43 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Andrew Pantyukhin Message-ID: <20061122164143.GD50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20061122071417.64116.qmail@web57805.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Rachel Florentine , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ezmlm Port Okay Or Junk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:45:47 -0000 On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 10:30:58AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 11/22/06, Rachel Florentine wrote: > >105Hi; > >Okay, I learned from sad experience and you all > >that the qmail port is junk. What about ezmlm? > >Same thing? Or good to go? > > Didn't you know that /usr/ports is a big pile of > junk? The problem is, we can't live without it. That's a weird thing to say. Although there are many things in ports that are not supported or are someone's mostly useless extra toy, a lot of the ports are well done and well supported and worth using in general. If he doesn't like qmail and won't use sendmail, then he can check out others and a question about which people like is not so bad an idea, although it is unfortunately likely to set of yet another religious war YARW. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 16:47:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7664816A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E25243D53 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:46:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so254519wxc for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:47:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr14672605wxd.1164214042066; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:47:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i10sm14304030wxd.2006.11.22.08.47.21; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:47:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D65BA56; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:47:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2517B8EE; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:47:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:47:18 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <200611221245.11425.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <20061122064403.K16016@scorpio.seibercom.net> <200611221245.11425.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061122114532.8F11.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.28 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: 'pkg_version' comparison failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:47:23 -0000 On Wednesday November 22, 2006 at 07:45:07 (AM) RW wrote: > On Wednesday 22 November 2006 11:48, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > What would cause this command: > > > > /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= > > > > to produce this error message: > > > > openoffice.org-2.0.3 ! Comparison failed > > > > I have updated the ports tree several times; however, the error remains. > > No other ports exhibits this phenomena. > > This port recently moved. Thanks! I check the UPDATING file on a daily basis; however, I never check the MOVED. Maybe I should start. -- Gerard Mail from '@gmail' is rejected and/or discarded here. Don't waste your time! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 16:53:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037C316A417 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36B143D7B for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:52:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C131A4D89; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:52:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C95E515B5; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:52:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:52:38 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061122165238.GA37819@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061120111952.4213dacb.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <200611220712.HAA18428@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611220712.HAA18428@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:53:04 -0000 --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:12:38PM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if the di= sks > > are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no > > one process "blocks", but they're all a little slower. >=20 > I collected a bit of data: >=20 > While copying a large file from disk1 to disk2, >=20 > time ls on a small directory on disk3 (not cached in memory) >=20 > real 0m0.032s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.003s >=20 > time ls on a small directory on disk2 >=20 > real 4m51.911s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.002s >=20 > I expect access to a busy disk to take longer, but 5 minutes is > a bit much. And that's the root directory of the filesystem, > it didn't have to follow a long chain of directories to get there. >=20 > Sometimes I see long delays when accessing disk3, but it is > behaving at the moment. ls still has to acquire a number of locks in order to be sure that the contents of the directory aren't changing. If there are lots of other processes all competing for these locks, it will be slow. It looks like that's the case on your system, although details of your workload have been trimmed from your email. This should be better in a future version of FreeBSD (when it's safe to use shared locks instead of exlusive for vfs lookups) but today there may not be much you can do apart from lowering the load. Kris --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZIBWWry0BWjoQKURArN6AKD+u0/+FDVSWrPLw5bXk0JAJZ8ecgCfXeMi bPcH8jWbjO9eHlZgATLwY40= =txuM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 16:59:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF5316A47C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:59:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aharrison@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB17E43D5C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:58:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aharrison@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so192337uge for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:59:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T7d+PrX9KkdN2kQ0Y1tCTW0D8xWz0fz9vQMYygyjep3HVKpphX9qLEM7GxVSK0qLqe/acH/5Op/H0I96ld67RZsZ4nzjE95EOVKZf4UkKamDna3ZYKfYAEnuCcF7CR1X5f1vRV58YRbEZLqNlpuoOFkmtUCxK9cJv4oBcQ7Etmk= Received: by 10.78.160.2 with SMTP id i2mr8001404hue.1164214746541; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.176.14 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:59:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:59:06 -0500 From: "Andy Harrison" To: "Boris Samorodov" In-Reply-To: <15153251@srv.sem.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <15153251@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: linux-sun-jdk15, Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:59:09 -0000 On 11/22/06, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > Where did you get the version 1.5.0.09? I checked out cvsweb, and > there is 1.5.0.07. Doh! Sorry... totally spaced out. I forgot that last month I had updated the Makefile to try to use the new version since 1.5.0.07 can no longer be obtained from the Sun website. # diff old.Makefile Makefile [aharrison@aharrison:/usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15] 5c5 < # $FreeBSD: /repoman/r/pcvs/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15/Makefile,v 1.21 2006/06/13 19:51:13 glewis Exp $ --- > # $FreeBSD: ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15/Makefile,v 1.21 2006/06/13 19:51:13 glewis Exp $ 10c10 < PORTEPOCH= 2 --- > #PORTEPOCH= 2 35c35 < JDK_REVISION= 07 --- > JDK_REVISION= 09 So anyway, probably not a good question for this list.... ;) -- Andy Harrison From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 17:02:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F22416A403; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BB443DAE; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:01:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from yavin.vindaloo.com (yavin.vindaloo.com [172.24.144.34]) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A545C34; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:30:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from dagobah.vindaloo.com (dagobah.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.68]) by yavin.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DC225332; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:30:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.vindaloo.com (localhost.vindaloo.com [IPv6:::1]) by dagobah.vindaloo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAMGQa2v001604; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:26:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) From: Christopher Sean Hilton To: up@3.am In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:26:35 -0500 Message-Id: <1164212795.1087.12.camel@dagobah.vindaloo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: External USB drive kernel problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:02:34 -0000 On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 12:38 -0500, up@3.am wrote: > (Please reply directly to me, as I am not subscribed) > > I just bought a VIA external USB enclosure with a Hitachi 200GB ATA drive > to use for disk-based backups. I put it on my test box here, which I just > upgraded to 6.2-Prerelease. All drivers required by the handbook for this > application are still in the kernel: > > device scbus > device da > device pass > device uhci > device ohci > device usb > device umass > device ehci > > However, it will not even finish booting with the USB drive plugged in. > It gets hung up on "Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle". If I > unplug the drive, it immediately finishes booting ok. If I then plug it > back in, I get this: > > Nov 21 12:17:23 amanda kernel: umass0: VIA Technologies Inc. USB 2.0 IDE > Bridge, rev 2.00/0.03, addr 2 > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: Fixed > Direct Access SCSI-2 device > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: da0: 305245MB (625142448 512 byte sectors: > 255H 63S/T 38913C) > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: umass0: Invalid CSW: tag 9 should be 10 > Nov 21 12:19:33 amanda kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache > failed, status == 0x10, scsi status == 0x0 > > Nov 21 12:24:58 amanda kernel: Opened disk da0 -> 5 > > If I try to then run sysinstall to run fdisk, it will not allow the fdisk > configuration to be written to it. > > TIA for any advice, ideas, fixes, etc. > In all likelyhood FreeBSD needs some quirk to work with the IDE bridge chipset in your enclosure. I have noticed that the plain jane enclosures seem to work fine but the ones with special features fail. In particular I have an enclosure with both a disk and an SD media slot purchased from and branded by Compusa that does not work with FreeBSD. I have also noticed that the enclosures with a one touch backup button aren't supported. I unfortunately do not know how to debug these enclosures. They tend to be so cheap that I just home in on the ones that are supported. I've noticed that the local Best Buy is carrying an Adaptec enclosure. I have two of the 2.5" ones and they seem to work fine. Here's a link to the 3.5" version which I assume uses that same chipset as the 2.5" one: http://preview.tinyurl.com/vzsha http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=6991605&st=adaptec&type=product&id=1099392683637 -- Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 17:27:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF0016A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from signal.itea.ntnu.no (signal.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.190.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3074043D46 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:26:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by signal.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF34034174 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:27:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by signal.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:27:21 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 73497 invoked by uid 88); 22 Nov 2006 18:27:20 +0100 Received: from 10.84-48-62.nextgentel.com (HELO [10.0.0.2]) (84.48.62.10) by maren.thelosingend.net (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:27:04 +0100 Message-ID: <45648854.1070002@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:26:44 +0100 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060522) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0611220553y5d56689es1468b949448bf1e6@mail.gmail.com> <45645904.8090108@orchid.homeunix.org> <2cd0a0da0611220704vca1718w3427551d57f3a702@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611220704vca1718w3427551d57f3a702@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=9198BB40; url=mailto:pgpkey@svein.halvorsen.cc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig46877E5853212530A5C6BD89" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: To which port GPG belongs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:27:26 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig46877E5853212530A5C6BD89 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable VeeJay wrote: > I have this Help Instructions from a Step-by-Step for Apache installati= on On a side note, you would probably want to install Apache via ports. Svein Halvor --------------enig46877E5853212530A5C6BD89 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: mailto:pgpkey@svein.halvorsen.cc to get my PGP-key iD8DBQFFZIhbhQg3vZGYu0ARArDuAJ9mBqAppmv1Aw1jwQ/2IjXoBHqDMwCeKkFb LHQxbxG3l9FjbbGmsKeaeuw= =71IF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig46877E5853212530A5C6BD89-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 17:38:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B5216A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from vsmtp12.tin.it (vsmtp12.tin.it [212.216.176.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7126743D46 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:37:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from [10.155.100.8] (87.7.236.130) by vsmtp12.tin.it (7.2.072.1) (authenticated as vdemart1@tin.it) id 452629DE0138C5A9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:38:25 +0100 From: vittorio To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:38:03 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611221838.04179.vdemart1@tin.it> Subject: IPFW & NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:38:29 -0000 I have two FreeBSD 6.1 boxes one of which (IP 10.0.0.1) is an NFS server and the other one (IP 10.0.0.2) is, among other things, an NFS client sharing directories with the NFS server. It all works correctly and I can mount_nfs all the directories from the server. BUT, I'm now trying to use an IPFW firewall both on the server and on the client. My simple aim is to setup connections between the 10.0.0.1 server and the 10.0.0.2 client ** only **; no connections should be possible with other clients! Now I've tried the poor documentation I could find googling with the keywords "freebsd ipfw nfs" to no avail, I cannot mount_nfs any share on te client because something goes wrong with RPC. Concentrating on the client side (no ipfw for the moment on teh server) I tried the following ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 2049,111,1022 to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0 setup keep-state OR ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.0.2 2049,111,1022 via fxp0 setup keep-state OR ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 2049,111,1022 to me via fxp0 setup keep-state OR ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 to me 2049,111,1022 via fxp0 setup keep-state If I disable the firewall it all goes smootly. Could you please help me? Ciao Vittorio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 17:41:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A5416A40F for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:41:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@gnulife.org) Received: from floyd.gnulife.org (ns1.gnulife.org [207.191.130.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC2043D72 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamie@gnulife.org) Received: from floyd.gnulife.org (localhost.gnulife.org [127.0.0.1]) by floyd.gnulife.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAMHbY4j021234 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:37:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jamie@gnulife.org) Received: from localhost (jamie@localhost) by floyd.gnulife.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id kAMHbYLk021231 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:37:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jamie@gnulife.org) X-Authentication-Warning: floyd.gnulife.org: jamie owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:37:34 -0600 (CST) From: Jamie To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061122111131.U19707@floyd.gnulife.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:41:58 -0000 Greetings! I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler seems to be referencing mntent.h and the compilation fails with: from /usr/include/mntent.h:2, from ../../../gcc-4.0.3/libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:97: /usr/include/mntent.h:2:20: error: #include nested too deeply I am compiling this with gcc 2.95 and gnu make 3.80. Does anyone know why it's trying to include mntent.h? From what I've read, this is a system V header file, so I can't understand why . Are there any switches I should be passing to make? Commands I'm running: mkdir gcc-build cd gcc-build ../gcc-4.0.3/configure --prefix=/tools --disable-nls --enable-shared --enable-languages=c make bootstrap - Jamie The Moon is Waxing Crescent (4% of Full) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 18:22:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1812A16A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:22:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B4543D46 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:22:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AF25F5F; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:22:51 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRu0yiNHOesi; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:22:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-95-165.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.95.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856445C79; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:22:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45649571.2080004@mac.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:22:41 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vittorio References: <200611221838.04179.vdemart1@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <200611221838.04179.vdemart1@tin.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW & NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:22:53 -0000 vittorio wrote: > I have two FreeBSD 6.1 boxes one of which (IP 10.0.0.1) is an NFS server and > the other one (IP 10.0.0.2) is, among other things, an NFS client sharing > directories with the NFS server. > It all works correctly and I can mount_nfs all the directories from the > server. > BUT, I'm now trying to use an IPFW firewall both on the server and on the > client. My simple aim is to setup connections between the 10.0.0.1 server and > the 10.0.0.2 client ** only **; no connections should be possible with other > clients! You should probably use a permit all between .1 and .2, rather than trying to use stateful rules with RPC services which will run on arbitrarily chosen ports. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 18:25:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61CD16A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from th.lacoste@wanadoo.fr) Received: from ultra1.univ-paris12.fr (ultra1.univ-paris12.fr [193.51.100.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D03943D45 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:24:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th.lacoste@wanadoo.fr) Received: from st-simon.miage.univ-paris12.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra1.univ-paris12.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAMIPBWT004423 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:25:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from sirius.miage.univ-paris12.fr (sirius.miage.univ-paris12.fr [194.214.13.28]) by st-simon.miage.univ-paris12.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C9A47281A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:25:10 +0100 (CET) From: Thierry Lacoste To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:25:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611221925.09621.th.lacoste@wanadoo.fr> Subject: check_disk_smb: another nagios problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:25:14 -0000 There is something weird about check_disk_smb from nagios-plugins-1.4.3,1 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10. =46rom the command line (pwd is /usr/local/libexec/nagios) the switches work as expected: # ./check_disk_smb -H 194.214.13.140 -s public -u guest -p "" Domain=3D[MIAGE] OS=3D[Unix] Server=3D[Samba 3.0.22] Disk ok - 396M (79%) free on \\194.214.13.140\public One has the same result without the switches: =2E/check_disk_smb 194.214.13.140 public guest "" Domain=3D[MIAGE] OS=3D[Unix] Server=3D[Samba 3.0.22] Disk ok - 396M (79%) free on \\194.214.13.140\public But the second form is the only way I can make it work within nagios define command{ command_name check_disk_smb command_line $USER1$/check_disk_smb $HOSTADDRESS$ public guest "" } If I introduce the switches (e.g like below) I have all sorts of errors (invalid warning threshold, Access denied, etc ...) depending on the order of the arguments. define command{ command_name check_disk_smb command_line $USER1$/check_disk_smb -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -s public -u=20 guest -p "" } Is anybody else seeing this? Have I done something wrong? Regards, Thierry. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 18:34:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8FD16A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2186043D53 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:33:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:34:10 -0500 id 000564D8.45649822.00001EC3 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:34:09 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: vittorio Message-Id: <20061122133409.f98a8b67.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200611221838.04179.vdemart1@tin.it> References: <200611221838.04179.vdemart1@tin.it> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW & NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:34:11 -0000 In response to vittorio : > I have two FreeBSD 6.1 boxes one of which (IP 10.0.0.1) is an NFS server and > the other one (IP 10.0.0.2) is, among other things, an NFS client sharing > directories with the NFS server. > It all works correctly and I can mount_nfs all the directories from the > server. > BUT, I'm now trying to use an IPFW firewall both on the server and on the > client. My simple aim is to setup connections between the 10.0.0.1 server and > the 10.0.0.2 client ** only **; no connections should be possible with other > clients! > Now I've tried the poor documentation I could find googling with the > keywords "freebsd ipfw nfs" to no avail, I cannot mount_nfs any share on te > client because something goes wrong with RPC. > Concentrating on the client side (no ipfw for the moment on teh server) I > tried the following NFS is difficult to firewall, as it's not guaranteed to use the same ports all the time. The NFS server has options to restrict who can connect, see the man page for exports. Othwerwise, Chuck's advice was good. Additionally, you can debug IPFW using 'ipfw show', and by inserting "log" statements into your ruleset to get more useful feedback. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 18:40:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5BF16A505 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rkellison@cinci.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-04.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-04.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B6D43DA4 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:39:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rkellison@cinci.rr.com) Received: from bobo ([69.133.6.10]) by ms-smtp-04.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAMIeEHr011295 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:40:15 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert Kellison" To: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:40:13 -0500 Message-ID: <000201c70e65$a73172f0$0200a8c0@bobo> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: BTX Loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:40:25 -0000 I have tried to install Free BSD 6.1 after burning the ISO to CD. The loader loads very slowly (on character per 1 or 2 seconds) and finally = hangs up after the line (root @ opu.cse.buffalo.edu ..) My computer is a = Shuttle XPX SK21G with a Sempron 3100 and a SATA drive. I am about to give up after not finding any fixes. Do you have any solutions? Thank You From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 19:01:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A6F16A50B for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grobinson@goombah.com) Received: from transpose.com (117.16.44.69.static.hardhathosting.com [69.44.16.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A2743D99 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:00:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grobinson@goombah.com) Received: from [192.168.111.2] (virtualdev.gwi.net [207.5.168.142]) by transpose.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id kAMJ0lf22413 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:00:47 -0600 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:00:43 -0500 From: Gary Robinson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061122140043.601684.8f5b0c7a@goombah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (GMessage framework 1.3.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Goombah, LLC X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.3.8 Subject: Gnome display configuration problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:01:16 -0000 Hi, Yesterday I installed freebsd 6.1 on an old Dell PowerEdge 1300. It's working fine with one exception. I installed gnome from freebsd ports, and it's giving me a 640x480, 80 Hz screen resolution. The Screen Resolution Preferences panel gives that combination as the only option. But my monitor has better capabilities. I have edited my xorg.conf.new so that it contains info describing my display, a Nanoa T2-17TS: Section "Monitor" DisplaySize 1250 938 # mm Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Nanoa" ModelName "T2-17TS" Option "DPMS" HorizSync 30-86 VertRefresh 55-160 EndSection Other relevant information was automatically filled in be "Xorg -config xorg.conf.new": Section "Device" ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional #Option "accel" # [] #Option "crt_display" # [] #Option "composite_sync" # [] #Option "hw_cursor" # [] #Option "linear" # [] #Option "tv_out" # [] #Option "tv_standard" # #Option "mmio_cache" # [] #Option "test_mmio_cache" # [] #Option "panel_display" # [] #Option "probe_clocks" # [] #Option "reference_clock" # #Option "shadow_fb" # [] #Option "sw_cursor" # [] Identifier "Card0" Driver "ati" VendorName "ATI" BoardName "3D Rage IIC AGP" ChipSet "ati" ChipId 0x4757 ChipRev 0x7a BusID "PCI:1:0:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 1 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 4 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 8 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 15 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection Does anyone have any thoughts about what I can do so that Gnome gives me more options? Any help would be appreciated. -- Gary Robinson CTO Emergent Music, LLC grobinson@goombah.com 207-942-3463 Company: http://www.goombah.com Blog: http://www.garyrobinson.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 19:40:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5167016A47B for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levchenko.i@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000C843D5A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:40:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from levchenko.i@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so234670uge for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:40:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RQyzMzdc3K3xc6ZoV4MSmoL51I+VJCGNdkRMkezqoi8U4qzKD7Pn64VntNFIlivz2UJDSRBi11olPDM1lT5vZW+OCowKqbMqSdkCcUYXTvkb/Bn69j8JEThFHNslh24Pd0up3lPXEbjIHDDUNmA//rFjqToxJXWJUd+urkWHhL0= Received: by 10.66.244.10 with SMTP id r10mr3652789ugh.1164224444300; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:40:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.233.7 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:40:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:40:43 +0200 From: "Ivan Levchenko" To: "Chris Hastie" In-Reply-To: <3UroRaFMaCXFFwwJ@celandine.oak-wood.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3UroRaFMaCXFFwwJ@celandine.oak-wood.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big external drives - which filesystem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:40:50 -0000 There is a UFS2 driver for Windows, google on it and you are sure to find it. (There are also ext2/3 drivers for Windows if you prefer that one.) I use ext2 on my usb pen drive and it works great under windows. On 11/16/06, Chris Hastie wrote: > I've just acquired a Western Digital 200GB USB 2 external HDD. After > some initial glitches my FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE machine seems to recognise > it fine. > > It comes pre-formatted with a single FAT32 file system (although > confusingly there is a note in the manual about FAT32 not supporting > partitions >32 GB and suggesting you change it to NTFS). > > Attempting to mount this hits the "mountmsdosfs(); disk too big, sorry" > problem. > > The primary intended use for this drive is for off-site backups, but it > would be useful if it was formatted such that I can easily plug it into > Windows boxes to get at files occasionally. What are my best options for > achieving this? > > The MSDOSFS_LARGE kernel option seems to come with a lot of warnings and > caveats. Is it really as ropey as it sounds? Is NTFS an option? Or would > I be better partitioning the drive into two FAT32 partitions of < 128GB > each? If I go down that route how does this appear to FreeBSD - > presumably as different slices on da0 which are mounted separately? Or > am I just asking for trouble using these filesystems and should just > stick to ufs2 and abandon any plans to maintain compatibility with > windows machines? > > Thanks for your help. > -- > Chris Hastie > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Best Regards, Ivan Levchenko levchenko.i@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 20:21:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4381E16A509 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82F243D8B for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:20:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F011A3C1C; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:20:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7063A515B5; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:20:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:20:41 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jamie Message-ID: <20061122202041.GA40610@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061122111131.U19707@floyd.gnulife.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061122111131.U19707@floyd.gnulife.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:21:03 -0000 --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote: >=20 >=20 > Greetings! >=20 > I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler > seems to be referencing mntent.h and the compilation fails with: >=20 > from /usr/include/mntent.h:2, > from ../../../gcc-4.0.3/libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:97: > /usr/include/mntent.h:2:20: error: #include nested too deeply >=20 >=20 > I am compiling this with gcc 2.95 and gnu make 3.80. >=20 > Does anyone know why it's trying to include mntent.h? From what I've > read, this is a system V header file, so I can't understand why . Are > there any switches I should be passing to make? Why not use the FreeBSD port? Kris --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZLEZWry0BWjoQKURAo/SAJ9Vh0lkjWJWPx7BBCB4Qsz83L/j7wCgtNcb PZZZ3WOjsEt2ouNE22fI1Sc= =Qjqi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 20:23:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831DD16A47C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: from kim-out.schedom-europe.net (kim.schedom-europe.net [193.109.184.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 965AC43D67 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:22:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: (qmail 31381 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2006 20:22:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kim.schedom-europe.net) (193.109.184.78) by kim.schedom-europe.net with SMTP; 22 Nov 2006 20:22:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 7615 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2006 19:39:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (83.101.7.35) by kim.schedom-europe.net with SMTP; 22 Nov 2006 19:39:35 -0000 From: Beni To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:39:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061121202339.46C1016A5F4@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Face: %*c?V7%A[c.}s2rI*TaRWm-[I-, ZLpBKmmC-@)J}KGbr)=a, TsXSA=:ArC(<=?utf-8?q?v=5C/=5F=25BaB=24K=0A=09=24=60E=7D6=7EyjIqu/SN=3A=24Pb=7DGngR+8=3D?= =?utf-8?q?dE=60?=)V~48zl6) =?utf-8?q?BhEtfQ2=3D=7ChScx=3Frn30d!QMd=3F=2E=60/hR!l+=0A=09x?=(]+zXesMf?'W[>46aPKMAAwd7eT{X_O9besb[u]'Y(DAe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611222039.27648.beni@brinckman.info> X-Antivirus: This mail has been scanned for viruses by schedom vof (http://www.dommel.com) Cc: Graham Bentley Subject: Re: Opera > Cups > Print! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:23:16 -0000 On Wednesday 22 November 2006 01:49, Graham Bentley wrote: > Anyone got this working? > > Firefox and other apps all printing fine :) > > Tried Opera advice and googled about > to no avail .... Thanks ! I'm using KDE and had to put the following in the Printer Program-tab from the Print-menu in Opera : Program : kprinter Parameter : -stdin (mind the "dash") This opens the standard kde-printing window where you can choose your installed printer from. You should check the freebsd-questions archives, I believe there was an similar answar for printing with opera under gnome. Hope this helps, Beni. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 20:49:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D2416A492 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCF743D49 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:49:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gmz2Q-0002C4-4k for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:49:46 +0000 Received: from esperance.zetnet.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with SMTP id kAMKnjdF019263 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:49:45 GMT Received: (qmail 91555 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Nov 2006 20:49:40 -0000 From: "Frank Shute" Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:49:40 +0000 To: Gary Robinson Message-ID: <20061122204940.GA91508@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20061122140043.601684.8f5b0c7a@goombah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061122140043.601684.8f5b0c7a@goombah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 i386 X-Organisation: 'Esperance Linux' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:49:46 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome display configuration problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:49:48 -0000 On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 02:00:43PM -0500, Gary Robinson wrote: > > Hi, > > Yesterday I installed freebsd 6.1 on an old Dell PowerEdge 1300. It's > working fine with one exception. I installed gnome from freebsd ports, > and it's giving me a 640x480, 80 Hz screen resolution. The Screen > Resolution Preferences panel gives that combination as the only option. > But my monitor has better capabilities. > > I have edited my xorg.conf.new so that it contains info describing my > display, a Nanoa T2-17TS: > > Section "Monitor" > DisplaySize 1250 938 # mm > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "Nanoa" > ModelName "T2-17TS" > Option "DPMS" > HorizSync 30-86 > VertRefresh 55-160 > EndSection > > Other relevant information was automatically filled in be "Xorg -config > xorg.conf.new": > > Section "Device" > ### Available Driver options are:- > ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", > ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" > ### [arg]: arg optional > #Option "accel" # [] > #Option "crt_display" # [] > #Option "composite_sync" # [] > #Option "hw_cursor" # [] > #Option "linear" # [] > #Option "tv_out" # [] > #Option "tv_standard" # > #Option "mmio_cache" # [] > #Option "test_mmio_cache" # [] > #Option "panel_display" # [] > #Option "probe_clocks" # [] > #Option "reference_clock" # > #Option "shadow_fb" # [] > #Option "sw_cursor" # [] > Identifier "Card0" > Driver "ati" > VendorName "ATI" > BoardName "3D Rage IIC AGP" > ChipSet "ati" > ChipId 0x4757 > ChipRev 0x7a > BusID "PCI:1:0:0" > EndSection > > Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > Device "Card0" > Monitor "Monitor0" > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 1 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 4 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 8 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 15 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 16 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 24 > EndSubSection > EndSection > > Does anyone have any thoughts about what I can do so that Gnome gives > me more options? > > Any help would be appreciated. Try replacing your screen section with something like this: Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultColorDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" "640x480" ViewPort 0 0 EndSubSection EndSection Swap the Modes order to find something comfortable. 1280x1024 might be a bit uncomfortable (small text). Or you might be able to toggle through the modes in Gnome. -- Frank echo "f r a n k @ e s p e r a n c e - l i n u x . c o . u k" | sed 's/ //g' --->PGP keyID: 0x10BD6F4B<--- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 21:04:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEACD16A47B for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:04:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from mail.ecommerce.com (mail.ecommerce.com [80.121.204.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22EEB43D46 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:03:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: (qmail 13672 invoked by uid 399); 22 Nov 2006 21:24:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?71.18.255.151?) (80.121.204.1) by mail.opentransfer.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2006 21:24:42 -0000 Message-ID: <4564BA54.1060200@wilderness.homeip.net> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:00:04 -0600 From: Drew Sanford User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060926) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <45626DE3.9040507@wilderness.homeip.net> <448xi3fp66.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <448xi3fp66.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: firefox build error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:04:21 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Laurence Sanford writes: > >> Firefox build from ports is exiting with this error: >> >> cc -o gtk2xtbin.o -c -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD6\" >> -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -DBUILD_ID=0000000000 -D_IMPL_GTKXTBIN_API >> -DUSE_XIM -I../../../dist/include/xpcom >> -I../../../dist/include/gtkxtbin -I../../../dist/include >> -I/usr/local/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include >> -I/usr/include -I../../../dist/sdk/include -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include >> -fPIC -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include >> -Wall -W -Wno-unused -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wno-long-long -O2 >> -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe >> -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O2 -DXTHREADS -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API >> -I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/include >> -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/cairo >> -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 >> -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include >> -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include >> -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include >> -include ../../../mozilla-config.h -DMOZILLA_CLIENT gtk2xtbin.c >> In file included from gtk2xtbin.h:44, >> from gtk2xtbin.c:46: >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1181: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1325: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1392: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1399: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1423: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1475: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1498: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1572: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1593: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1604: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1615: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1630: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:1645: error: syntax error before >> "_X_SENTINEL" >> gtk2xtbin.c:188: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type >> gtk2xtbin.c: In function `xt_client_create': >> gtk2xtbin.c:566: warning: implicit declaration of function >> XtVaCreateWidget' >> gtk2xtbin.c:568: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer >> without a cast >> gmake[2]: *** [gtk2xtbin.o] Error 1 >> gmake[2]: Leaving directory >> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/widget/src/gtkxtbin' >> gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 >> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' >> gmake: *** [default] Error 2 >> *** Error code 2 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. >> >> I figure something is out of date, but I've updated xorg and gtk20 and >> I'm still getting this. Any pointers? Thanks in advance. > > Did you do the Gnome-stuff update described in UPDATING last month? No, I didn't. Of course, another box I have running 6.1 that is only a few days different version of the same software did not exhibit this problem. I performed the command indicated in UPDATING, and tried again. It failed with the same error. If it helps any, I'm getting exactly the same error trying to upgrade Thunderbird, and both the firefox and the firefox15 port give this error. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 21:05:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B8E16A62D for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAF543D45 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:04:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=localhost.cpcnw.co.uk) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1GmzH7-0000Te-Tz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:04:59 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:05:13 -0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Graham Bentley" Organization: Custom PC North West Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: Upgrade Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:05:03 -0000 > You've confused STABLE with RELEASE. 6.2 has not reached RELEASE. > 6-STABLE is the latest "these changes worked fine in CURRENT (right now, > aka 7) and have been MFCed (merged from current) so that more people can > try them out", which right now corresponds to the version of FreeBSDthat > is just about to be released which also happens to be called6.2-RC1 > (release candidate 1)). When 6.2 is ready to go, a new RELEASEbranch is > created (6.2-RELEASE) which only gets security fixes. So, if I want the 'latest version' that 'isnt a work in progress' (or at least tested to the point where it is know to be working correctly in the majority of scenarios) always use the RELEASE branches ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 21:14:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC0716A407 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@gnulife.org) Received: from floyd.gnulife.org (ns1.gnulife.org [207.191.130.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E6E43DB5 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:09:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamie@gnulife.org) Received: from floyd.gnulife.org (localhost.gnulife.org [127.0.0.1]) by floyd.gnulife.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAML54On023779; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:05:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jamie@gnulife.org) Received: from localhost (jamie@localhost) by floyd.gnulife.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id kAML54qM023776; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:05:04 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jamie@gnulife.org) X-Authentication-Warning: floyd.gnulife.org: jamie owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:05:04 -0600 (CST) From: Jamie To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20061122202041.GA40610@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20061122145124.B21681@floyd.gnulife.org> References: <20061122111131.U19707@floyd.gnulife.org> <20061122202041.GA40610@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:14:17 -0000 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote: > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler > > seems to be referencing mntent.h and the compilation fails with: > > > > from /usr/include/mntent.h:2, > > from ../../../gcc-4.0.3/libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:97: > > /usr/include/mntent.h:2:20: error: #include nested too deeply > > > > > > I am compiling this with gcc 2.95 and gnu make 3.80. > > > > Does anyone know why it's trying to include mntent.h? From what I've > > read, this is a system V header file, so I can't understand why . Are > > there any switches I should be passing to make? > > Why not use the FreeBSD port? Because learning how to use some of the other tools outside the scope of the ports tree is kind of interesting, imho. I'd like to learn more about gcc and other tools for building software in FreeBSD, even if its just a purely academic pursuit. I guess working on a layer lower than the ports collection adds some satisfaction to my curiousity. There are those who use their cars solely for transportation, and others who enjoy restoring them/taking them apart/modifying them. I think the same kind of principles apply. Those just using their vehicles for transportation scratch their heads and wonder why anyone would have an interest in anything other than hassle free service. > > Kris > The Moon is Waxing Crescent (4% of Full) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 21:37:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5EE16A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buhnux@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988374440C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:23:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from buhnux@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so615580nfc for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:23:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=de/WcihNRx/tIZwvaytlGvERgyezRNGu/ObLq37OPTypEOgJDpdA+Ta5Q4GsGRcEA37mj8ZlNsVmWRIXJwb/0fRljhza2lhlv3X68bURt7NXFVaSBHZvBGqedVGpacmAC8X6QsJyg+90eD1bCDcEpAz+L2puJn5J08K9q9sFZv4= Received: by 10.82.141.4 with SMTP id o4mr958508bud.1164230633343; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:23:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.112.15 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:23:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:23:53 -0500 From: "Michael Johnson" Sender: buhnux@gmail.com To: Jamie In-Reply-To: <20061122145124.B21681@floyd.gnulife.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061122111131.U19707@floyd.gnulife.org> <20061122202041.GA40610@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061122145124.B21681@floyd.gnulife.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 92effbde7cfb6bc6 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:37:36 -0000 On 11/22/06, Jamie wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote: > > > > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > > > I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler > > > seems to be referencing mntent.h and the compilation fails with: > > > > > > from /usr/include/mntent.h:2, > > > from ../../../gcc-4.0.3/libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:97: > > > /usr/include/mntent.h:2:20: error: #include nested too deeply > > > > > > > > > I am compiling this with gcc 2.95 and gnu make 3.80. > > > > > > Does anyone know why it's trying to include mntent.h? From what I've > > > read, this is a system V header file, so I can't understand why . Are > > > there any switches I should be passing to make? > > > > Why not use the FreeBSD port? > > > Because learning how to use some of the other tools outside the scope of > the ports tree is kind of interesting, imho. I'd like to learn more about > gcc and other tools for building software in FreeBSD, even if its just a > purely academic pursuit. > > I guess working on a layer lower than the ports collection adds some > satisfaction to my curiousity. > You could always look in ports to see what configure flags, patches, or any other changes needed to compile on FreeBSD. > There are those who use their cars solely for transportation, and others > who enjoy restoring them/taking them apart/modifying them. I think the > same kind of principles apply. Those just using their vehicles for > transportation scratch their heads and wonder why anyone would have an > interest in anything other than hassle free service. > > > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > The Moon is Waxing Crescent (4% of Full) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 21:43:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1996216A510 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:43:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528B244148 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:34:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAMLWoUH052904; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:32:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kAMLWocj052903; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:32:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:32:50 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Graham Bentley Message-ID: <20061122213250.GA52848@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:43:28 -0000 On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 09:05:13PM -0000, Graham Bentley wrote: > >You've confused STABLE with RELEASE. 6.2 has not reached RELEASE. > >6-STABLE is the latest "these changes worked fine in CURRENT (right now, > >aka 7) and have been MFCed (merged from current) so that more people can > >try them out", which right now corresponds to the version of FreeBSDthat > >is just about to be released which also happens to be called6.2-RC1 > >(release candidate 1)). When 6.2 is ready to go, a new RELEASEbranch is > >created (6.2-RELEASE) which only gets security fixes. > > So, if I want the 'latest version' that 'isnt a work in progress' (or at > least tested > to the point where it is know to be working correctly in the majority of > scenarios) > always use the RELEASE branches ? Then use something like RELENG_6 or RELENG_6_1 That will get you the release plus security updates. I think the RELENG_6 will include stuff from 6.2 as soon as it is merged. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 21:43:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D1F16A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:43:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ranger@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from trinity.vnet-inc.com (matrix.vnet-inc.com [216.129.224.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118E844173 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:34:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Ranger@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.vnet-inc.com [127.0.0.1]) by trinity.vnet-inc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131E85A4581A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:52 -0700 (MST) Received: from trinity.vnet-inc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (matrix.vnet-inc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70220-09 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:51 -0700 (MST) Received: from 65-19-227-182.vnet-inc.com (65-19-227-182.vnet-inc.com [65.19.227.182]) by trinity.vnet-inc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DC55A457E0 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:51 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:57:32 -0700 (MST) From: Old Ranger X-Sender: Ranger@65-19-227-182.vnet-inc.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at vnet-inc.com Subject: Advice please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:43:30 -0000 Hello to all, I just ordered DSL from my phone service (and ISP) provider. I have a Dell dual core laptop enroute, with "extras". The advice I'd like, is some "do's" and "don'ts" when switching from dial-up to DSL with FreeBSD. What are the pitfalls? I'd like to avoid as many as possible. Regards, ########################################### Pastor Z. Wade Hampton www.oldpathsbaptistchurch.org "Only Saints and Warriors are allowed in my world now; and forever" ZWH 1998 ___________________________________________ Webmail access: www.oldpathsbaptistchurch.org/webmail ########################################### From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 21:46:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5580516A47C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-237-189.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.237.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9741F43E51 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:43:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAMLhVZj002893 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:43:32 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kAMLhVA4002873 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:43:31 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id TAA14770; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:02:54 GMT Message-Id: <200611221902.TAA14770@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:52:38 EST." <20061122165238.GA37819@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:02:54 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:46:10 -0000 In message <20061122165238.GA37819@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway writes: > > > I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if the di= > sks > > > are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no > > > one process "blocks", but they're all a little slower. > >=20 > > I collected a bit of data: > >=20 > > While copying a large file from disk1 to disk2, > >=20 > > time ls on a small directory on disk3 (not cached in memory) > >=20 > > real 0m0.032s > > user 0m0.000s > > sys 0m0.003s > >=20 > > time ls on a small directory on disk2 > >=20 > > real 4m51.911s > > user 0m0.000s > > sys 0m0.002s > >=20 > > I expect access to a busy disk to take longer, but 5 minutes is > > a bit much. And that's the root directory of the filesystem, > > it didn't have to follow a long chain of directories to get there. > >=20 > > Sometimes I see long delays when accessing disk3, but it is > > behaving at the moment. > > ls still has to acquire a number of locks in order to be sure that the > contents of the directory aren't changing. If there are lots of other > processes all competing for these locks, it will be slow. It looks > like that's the case on your system, although details of your workload > have been trimmed from your email. In telnet window 1: cd /disk1/ cp -ip very_big_file /disk2/bar/ (the workload) In telnet window 2: time ls /disk3/foo1/ (make sure time and ls are cached in memory) time ls /disk3/foo2/ (see timing numbers above) time ls /disk2/ (see timing numbers above) The /disk2/ directory is small, only contains 3 directories and .snap Would the cp into /disk2/bar/ lock the /disk2/ directory? IIRC the cp was still running after the ls completed. Other than the cp and ls, the machine should have been idle. None of the three disks have /, /usr, /var, /home or similar filesystems likely to have stray I/O. The crontab directory is empty. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 22:15:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24FD16A4C2 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grobinson@goombah.com) Received: from transpose.com (117.16.44.69.static.hardhathosting.com [69.44.16.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09E843D58 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:14:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grobinson@goombah.com) Received: from [192.168.111.2] (virtualdev.gwi.net [207.5.168.142]) by transpose.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id kAMLpSt13805; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:51:28 -0600 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:51:24 -0500 From: Gary Robinson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061122165124.183885.77099789@goombah.com> In-Reply-To: <20061122204940.GA91508@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20061122140043.601684.8f5b0c7a@goombah.com> <20061122204940.GA91508@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (GMessage framework 1.3.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Goombah, LLC X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.3.8 Cc: Frank Shute Subject: Re: Gnome display configuration problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:15:04 -0000 Frank, Thanks for your suggestion: >> Try replacing your screen section with something like this: >> >> Section "Screen" >> Identifier "Screen0" >> Device "Card0" >> Monitor "Monitor0" >> DefaultColorDepth 24 >> >> >> SubSection "Display" >> Depth 24 >> Modes "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" "640x480" >> ViewPort 0 0 >> EndSubSection >> EndSection I did that, and unfortunately it made no difference at all! I'm still only seeing 640x480, and that's the only option that comes up in the Screen Resolution Preferences panel. Actually the thing that bothers me more is the 60 hz refresh rate. That's too slow and hurts my eyes! Any other suggestions??? Thanks, Gary -- Gary Robinson CTO Emergent Music, LLC grobinson@goombah.com 207-942-3463 Company: http://www.goombah.com Blog: http://www.garyrobinson.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 22:23:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C6616A614 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Received: from entwistle.sonicboom.org (entwistle.sonicboom.org [66.93.34.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7636A43D8A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:22:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (entwistle.sonicboom.org [66.93.34.170]) by entwistle.sonicboom.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAMMN3XM048235 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:23:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Message-ID: <4564CDC7.10401@sonicboom.org> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:23:03 -0800 From: Brian User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: package dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:23:19 -0000 Is there a way to tell either portupgrade or make install in a ports folder to use a package for dependencies, even if one isn't available for port/package I'm installing/upgrading? Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 22:34:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568B116A415 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5932543D67 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:33:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gn0fW-000ORz-6x; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:34:14 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gn0g0-0002xr-GE; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:34:44 +0300 To: Brian References: <4564CDC7.10401@sonicboom.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:34:44 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4564CDC7.10401@sonicboom.org> (Brian's message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:23:03 -0800") Message-ID: <13390187@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: package dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:34:21 -0000 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:23:03 -0800 Brian wrote: > Is there a way to tell either portupgrade or make install in a ports > folder to use a package for dependencies, even if one isn't available > for port/package I'm installing/upgrading? May be you need a command "portupgrade -RPP"? WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 22:22:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97E116A513 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dvdhoris@yahoo.com) Received: from web58807.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web58807.mail.re1.yahoo.com [66.196.100.221]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19B6743E67 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:21:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvdhoris@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 6311 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Nov 2006 22:22:24 -0000 Message-ID: <20061122222224.6309.qmail@web58807.mail.re1.yahoo.com> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ibsmjtEn3tvYOcqyIxnG1SCgzH027S8mxFU7yrjnVMHkMzRMGzsIMdKXIa9FQmDCr46ZfLvZOPwhFk2FW4ebXbAzm6XTx+1oDZARYNfirmIZwAG2QbC/fnkf4WP17xogAdbWcGSLift7d99pznS/YII8Fh8IuLdTslz/inp+gXU=; X-YMail-OSG: Fa.HuCoVM1kk9qkEZ011OeldFy0BFWuNs0v9uTbhVafdZWhx2eqz8nyH4y_lwFurNsdRJUK3kwpVE8kxu4C0wg9abp8m4vyuix1.aClLA32liBkZl_HsOjk8_4MlkTLe1SJRI6md5ZWX9LPO6.d0pgPBnZqgLRvJHQ-- Received: from [68.196.189.103] by web58807.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:22:24 PST Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:22:24 -0800 (PST) From: David Horis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:35:17 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Mount and repair HD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:22:59 -0000 Hello, A Snap Server 1100 just died on me... (Single drive, FreeBSD-based, I think...) I think it's not HD related as I can't even get into to the hardware/bios reset mode. Have you folks ever heard of anyone opening one of these things up and mounting the drive on a regular PC? Since the drive probably has some coruption, due to the MB/OS crash, how would I go about fixing those before I mount the drive and try to copy off the files? Since I am not familiar with *nix, can someone point me to a walk through on this? (Is there a FreeBSD live CD I could use?) Thanks, David --------------------------------- Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 22:38:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DDD16A412 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6B6643D58 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:38:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 53442 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2006 22:38:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index; b=uEYXrOnFiTMT3i0BcHopeE5SFUmFr5lSl+/OWoDw+Bk+B82GfPwtYAuNSsA6Yt6mn0hR+khMo76bLKQZietM6bxf+nCLovmpRkQsIkprAYC2hIEM4wQMB+qvVjrDGFO3RkuolEQA+gMTl4+UG4AjzEn9XTaNkjxhIDFFt3hopWU= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login) by smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2006 22:38:34 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: wGbteNcVM1mXA.5AfIfq9jMg3ak5XubEGTUtjTSCfbf7R6LOmC5e5fqdaAsJVonVBoHFmzmHQNTfd4sIWMmpWiZ9eDPGTdylqqlnsOS25Y1ba9CWl1kNPQ-- From: "Tamouh H." To: "'Marko Kobal'" , Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:36:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <456463B3.3050005@arctur.si> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AccORoG1+KhCAPi1Q4GvXT+UBNPCFwAQAPnQ Message-Id: <20061122223803.E6B6643D58@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: RE: additional processor in IBM xSeries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:38:35 -0000 > > Hi, > > I have an IBM xSeries 225 with two-processor motherboard, > currently with only one Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. OS is 6.1p10, > otherwise is this an apache22-mysql50-php5 web server. > > I would like to add an additional, second Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. > Do I have to change anything in OS, kernel, etc, before this > step or can I just plug in the additional proc and thats it? > > -- > Kind regards, Marko Kobal. > _______________________________________________ Recompile Kernel with SMP option (check /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SMP) Tamouh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 22:53:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8B016A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:53:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D336C43D70 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:52:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-55-202.51-151.net24.it [151.51.202.55]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAMN3Rv1068671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:03:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kAMMr22T018600; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:53:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4564D4CE.1060104@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:53:02 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0611220715n7e88564ahe19f20d033ed39a9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611220715n7e88564ahe19f20d033ed39a9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: Does disk encryption causes a performance penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:53:17 -0000 VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > Does *disk encryption* causes a *performance* penalty for Data > Access/Read/Write, etc? > *Yes*. If your disk is faster than your CPU, I/O will slowdown. I've seen an Athlon64 4200+ use up to 90% of its computing power just to transfer files from an NFS server to a local SATA disk. In case the CPU was less powerful, or otherwise busy doing something else, total throughput would have decreased. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 22:55:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8EA16A407 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:55:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5010D43DCB for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:53:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 35310 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2006 22:54:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index; b=x02GACJcYxYw93okopBo6FF3J+3seKshRASXeWZRNnU5qi47/KbM3dxLAS2GqcPqLW2D+1c97iZ1vl9muM8tOQvd1NgukhgGW08sITrgwwWFbztg7YzpEdlFbMZLp6Xx6nBZOHoO/R4ZmA5zxnuR1TLdxv+7yefcc0pWxaunA20= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login) by smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2006 22:54:21 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: QGXsTYcVM1l2GkNaCTyskYGIQNB1ypHM5esFQ7MaFs4XtrhT1MnQc3u.NZlLScp7aP1cGa.5wEqKl_h1hzPU4GBQnr6MSJKnuXNTLOc.7A3kqs_v9u7r1g-- From: "Tamouh H." To: "'David Horis'" , Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:52:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20061122222224.6309.qmail@web58807.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AccOhpHth1vNebbTSpit0lTRQlto3QAAd4SQ Message-Id: <20061122225353.5010D43DCB@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: RE: Mount and repair HD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:55:05 -0000 =20 >=20 > Hello, >=20 > A Snap Server 1100 just died on me... (Single drive,=20 > FreeBSD-based, I think...) >=20 > I think it's not HD related as I can't even get into to the=20 > hardware/bios reset mode. >=20 > Have you folks ever heard of anyone opening one of these=20 > things up and mounting the drive on a regular PC? >=20 > Since the drive probably has some coruption, due to the MB/OS=20 > crash, how would I go about fixing those before I mount the=20 > drive and try to copy off the files? >=20 > Since I am not familiar with *nix, can someone point me to a=20 > walk through on this? (Is there a FreeBSD live CD I could use?) >=20 >=20 > Thanks, > David >=20 > =20 > --------------------------------- > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. These use regular IDE drives so you can plug them to any PC (Note, = you're voiding the warranty if you open the box). If FreeBSD OS is installed on them, the first thing I'd do is try to = boot from the HD unless a custom kernel was made. If this is not bootable drive, just UFS file system, then use FreeBSD = Boot CD off freebsd.org to boot the thing and mount the drive according = to what the drive is named e.g. mount /dev/ad1s1a / Good luck! Tamouh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 22:58:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AF016A494 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2208343D81 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gn12V-0008Gz-UC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:58:00 +0000 Received: from esperance.zetnet.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with SMTP id kAMMvxUa017179 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:57:59 GMT Received: (qmail 92454 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Nov 2006 22:57:54 -0000 From: "Frank Shute" Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:57:54 +0000 To: Gary Robinson Message-ID: <20061122225754.GA92361@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20061122140043.601684.8f5b0c7a@goombah.com> <20061122204940.GA91508@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <20061122165124.183885.77099789@goombah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061122165124.183885.77099789@goombah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 i386 X-Organisation: 'Esperance Linux' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:57:59 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome display configuration problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:58:08 -0000 On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:51:24PM -0500, Gary Robinson wrote: > > > Frank, > > Thanks for your suggestion: > > >> Try replacing your screen section with something like this: > >> > >> Section "Screen" > >> Identifier "Screen0" > >> Device "Card0" > >> Monitor "Monitor0" > >> DefaultColorDepth 24 > >> > >> > >> SubSection "Display" > >> Depth 24 > >> Modes "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" "640x480" > >> ViewPort 0 0 > >> EndSubSection > >> EndSection > > I did that, and unfortunately it made no difference at all! I'm still > only seeing 640x480, and that's the only option that comes up in the > Screen Resolution Preferences panel. Actually the thing that bothers me > more is the 60 hz refresh rate. That's too slow and hurts my eyes! > > Any other suggestions??? > Gary, All I can think of (being unfamiliar with Gnome) is that the graphics card isn't up to displaying 1280x1024 at 24 bits. Or you haven't copied xorg.conf.new to /etc/X11/xorg.conf and it's picking up a stale xorg.conf. Try changing the following parameters: DefaultColorDepth 8 Depth 8 Modes "1024x768" in /etc/X11/xorg.conf and restart X/Gnome. If it works then add higher resolutions and colour depths until you achieve a satisfactory result. You can also try starting X bare: Xorg -config /etc/X11/xorg.conf Ctl+Alt+Backspace to kill it. That will determine whether it's an X problem or a Gnome problem. -- Frank echo "f r a n k @ e s p e r a n c e - l i n u x . c o . u k" | sed 's/ //g' --->PGP keyID: 0x10BD6F4B<--- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 23:00:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798B916A412 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee (smtp-out.neti.ee [194.126.126.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA13343D5A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:59:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by MXR-4.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238B417154B for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:59:59 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.4.3 (20060930) (Debian) at neti.ee Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (MXR-2.estpak.ee [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iit5DI9Gj8sn for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:59:52 +0200 (EET) Received: from Relayhost2.neti.ee (Relayhost2 [192.168.1.102]) by MXR-4.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id B161C171893 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:59:52 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4564D667.4000507@raad.tartu.ee> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:59:51 +0200 From: Toomas Aas User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: ICH7 SATA RAID (LSI MegaRAID) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:00:07 -0000 Hello! I've bought a small server with Intel SE7230NH1 motherboard, which incorporates the ICH7 SATA RAID controller. Using the LSI BIOS utility, I created a RAID1 array of two disks and installed FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 (amd64) on it. atapci1: port 0x30c8-0x30cf,0x30e4-0x30e7,0x30c0-0x30c7,0x30e0-0x30e3,0x30a0-0x30af mem 0x88200000-0x882003ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci1: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 4 ports detected ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 ata4: on atapci1 ata5: on atapci1 ad4: 476940MB at ata2-master SATA300 ad6: 476940MB at ata3-master SATA300 ar0: 476772MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad4 at ata2-master ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad6 at ata3-master This server has a hot-swap drive cage that allows you to power off individual drives. I simulated a drive failure by powering off one of the drives. This resulted in console message: ar0: warning: mirror protection lost. RAID1 array in DEGRADED mode. ar0: writing of LSILogic v3 MegaRAID metadata is NOT supported yet. subdisk6: detached ad6: detached OK, the disk went away. This is witnessed by atacontrol: # atacontrol status ar0 ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 DOWN status DEGRADED Now, I power the disk on again. This brings on the following console message. ad6: 476940MB at ata3-master SATA300 The array status is still degraded, as shown by atacontrol: #atacontrol status ar0 ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: DEGRADED OK, so I think I need to rebuild the array, but this doesn't succeed: #atacontrol rebuild ar0 IOCATARAIDREBUILD: Input/Output error. When I reboot the server, it comes back up with the array at READY status immediately. Maybe this is because I have "Auto rebuild" set to "Yes" in BIOS. But is there any way to recover from this kind of failure without rebooting? Are my problems caused merely by the fact that "writing of LSILogic v3 MegaRAID metadata is NOT supported yet", or am I doing something wrong? Or maybe this is the problem that exists only in amd64 version and not in i386? Thanks in advance, -- Toomas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 23:18:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECDD16A407 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D87AE43D55 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:17:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 53163 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2006 23:18:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index; b=rnagGb0dkf/JA5IJ6rIPhij5W/hA8pBQUQ3HJqRZtvOVezXiztOdFG+4qPH7GOVVGHHYCgaSdvVi3FbOjBQaI/cbI4OM8dVW34nc05Gpgquf1Zi3kOm+HaT0ZJbEZ9EUAnYjkoM/3K6RlOikXMn+TXff501aOwzfNbN6H4ijaXA= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login) by smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2006 23:18:28 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: iGOAmgMVM1kGJoNuhginbypz03jhWeKH_Y.hPbU_4HFwE7RyTOL6XLH9bBJwUbA64tRrPgrBQVLaWlUff8mQXqCr_HAONsZDbSg32eOiiNRyfxBFh2JDTA-- From: "Tamouh H." To: "'Toomas Aas'" , Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:16:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <4564D667.4000507@raad.tartu.ee> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AccOigjYVNwMOUH1RGupHkoETW8WJgAAZh/A Message-Id: <20061122231758.D87AE43D55@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: RE: ICH7 SATA RAID (LSI MegaRAID) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:18:30 -0000 =20 >=20 > Hello! >=20 > I've bought a small server with Intel SE7230NH1 motherboard,=20 > which incorporates the ICH7 SATA RAID controller. Using the=20 > LSI BIOS utility, I created a RAID1 array of two disks and=20 > installed FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 > (amd64) on it. >=20 > atapci1: port=20 > 0x30c8-0x30cf,0x30e4-0x30e7,0x30c0-0x30c7,0x30e0-0x30e3,0x30a0-0x30af > mem 0x88200000-0x882003ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 > atapci1: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 4 ports detected > ata2: on atapci1 > ata3: on atapci1 > ata4: on atapci1 > ata5: on atapci1 > ad4: 476940MB at ata2-master SATA300 > ad6: 476940MB at ata3-master SATA300 > ar0: 476772MB status: READY > ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad4 at ata2-master > ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad6 at ata3-master >=20 > This server has a hot-swap drive cage that allows you to=20 > power off individual drives. I simulated a drive failure by=20 > powering off one of the drives. This resulted in console message: >=20 > ar0: warning: mirror protection lost. RAID1 array in DEGRADED mode. > ar0: writing of LSILogic v3 MegaRAID metadata is NOT supported yet. > subdisk6: detached > ad6: detached >=20 > OK, the disk went away. This is witnessed by atacontrol: > # atacontrol status ar0 > ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 DOWN status DEGRADED >=20 > Now, I power the disk on again. This brings on the following=20 > console message. >=20 > ad6: 476940MB at ata3-master SATA300 >=20 > The array status is still degraded, as shown by atacontrol: > #atacontrol status ar0 > ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: DEGRADED >=20 > OK, so I think I need to rebuild the array, but this doesn't succeed: > #atacontrol rebuild ar0 > IOCATARAIDREBUILD: Input/Output error. >=20 > When I reboot the server, it comes back up with the array at=20 > READY status immediately. Maybe this is because I have "Auto=20 > rebuild" set to "Yes" in BIOS. But is there any way to=20 > recover from this kind of failure without rebooting? Are my=20 > problems caused merely by the fact that "writing of LSILogic=20 > v3 MegaRAID metadata is NOT supported yet", or am I doing=20 > something wrong? Or maybe this is the problem that exists only in > amd64 version and not in i386? >=20 > Thanks in advance, > -- > Toomas >=20 >From experience, with these Software RAID, once you remove a disk, = you'll have to format it before you put the disk back in. Otherwise, = this will cause problems as the SW RAID will read the RAID part from the = disk and think it is working properly. Do your test by removing the Disk, then format it completely, insert it = back. Or plug a new HDD in its place. Tamouh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 23:49:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A0816A412 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9002743D5A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:48:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so650350nfc for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:49:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=s3B9QPBRwX49VR45dEKOFMI94JX+lPcWVpen6x/6BO+Uhf/+eo4x+j9prdqOxUvyoF+S0/Gu2/txlhadJw7F5iOxifrev/pkl7bUcRqzwnV7dLRyBBBwORSTRggw58mvFkjDwuT5WkRm+L9Y42NHBiSbcdbdKol9jHc1w71nMCQ= Received: by 10.82.120.15 with SMTP id s15mr1339955buc.1164239355209; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:49:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.18 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:49:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5aaed53f0611221549o4e73ac0er421c21b3cabc665e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:49:15 -0600 From: "Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T" Sender: dundeemt@gmail.com To: VeeJay , "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611220653g3bafe699l2ccb36da500e6089@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061121225903.fswba3d1uss8wgos@secure.rem1tech.com> <5aaed53f0611212245v2f194531q569ab17a9bac1d6e@mail.gmail.com> <2cd0a0da0611220549i1fe5d6dekc51e0aa0eda13ec2@mail.gmail.com> <5aaed53f0611220645n7b16fa53x81232f44d5197013@mail.gmail.com> <2cd0a0da0611220653g3bafe699l2ccb36da500e6089@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1c0da55afe6c7cba Cc: Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:49:18 -0000 On 11/22/06, VeeJay wrote: > Thanks Jeff... > > But does this encryption affects on Disk Speed or Performance for Data > Access/Read/Write? > > > On 11/22/06, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T wrote: > > Although I haven't used either, gbde and geli are possible methods. > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-encrypting.html > > As I stated before, I haven't used either so I am in no way an authoritative source, but in general anytime you do additional processing in the data channel, some penalty is going to be incurred. I am sure there are things that can be done to mitigate this penalty to a degree (i.e. offloading encryption operations to an add-in card) but only you can be the judge if the trade off is a good one. -Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 00:14:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1913116A492 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dvdhoris@yahoo.com) Received: from web58811.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web58811.mail.re1.yahoo.com [66.196.100.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 255B143D55 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:14:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvdhoris@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 67029 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Nov 2006 00:14:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=s1I4+c7SPSoqK0ggF39Uu6rhDUazHO2wCA8JajrPj2grDiRZiHFnbRorChb2o0M7IeN+RzW4Sf7SyEqvew8ESVdrlFs+MzBxbPFoqGqXkx+1XHPuecxn0kIBBRs8SeeFJpatqlmEJW0O1HI1eHbRbJqeZSIAOgI5neh3dXhAwWw=; X-YMail-OSG: GQeXqFUVM1k4OUi521eVbBBSUvfM4Vdfq38DxZIWKeIFGjEr40_7pj_EclIvGDiOjqWoczCdvgVcwawzUQWMeKbUkcYdD8_CQrQe_Iq76pbbSIifiv2Zku4PF1jOLYlnFOE2jkwdpevJDTsuiINeLOAfN8saGmIJvg-- Received: from [68.196.189.103] by web58811.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:14:47 PST Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:14:47 -0800 (PST) From: David Horis To: "Tamouh H." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061122225353.5010D43DCB@mx1.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <838552.63935.qm@web58811.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: Mount and repair HD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:14:49 -0000 Hi, Thanks for the tip. What iso should I get from the freebsd.org site? (5.5 or 6.1?) The warranty is long expired on this device... I've just popped it open... Looks like it's powered by a Pentium 166. (w/MMX! :) ) I seriously doubt it will act as a boot drive in a PC, as it seems some of the boot code is in NV ram. Since I am new to *nix, can someone describe the exact command I need to run in order to: 1) Boot the computer w/FreeBSD 2) Figure out if the drive is viewable, and what it is named. 2) Check the drive for errors. 3) Determine what partition on the drive has my data. 4) Copy the data over to a different drive. (Preferably via the network... SMB ) Thank you again, David "Tamouh H." wrote: > > Hello, > > A Snap Server 1100 just died on me... (Single drive, > FreeBSD-based, I think...) > > I think it's not HD related as I can't even get into to the > hardware/bios reset mode. > > Have you folks ever heard of anyone opening one of these > things up and mounting the drive on a regular PC? > > Since the drive probably has some coruption, due to the MB/OS > crash, how would I go about fixing those before I mount the > drive and try to copy off the files? > > Since I am not familiar with *nix, can someone point me to a > walk through on this? (Is there a FreeBSD live CD I could use?) > > > Thanks, > David > > > --------------------------------- > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. These use regular IDE drives so you can plug them to any PC (Note, you're voiding the warranty if you open the box). If FreeBSD OS is installed on them, the first thing I'd do is try to boot from the HD unless a custom kernel was made. If this is not bootable drive, just UFS file system, then use FreeBSD Boot CD off freebsd.org to boot the thing and mount the drive according to what the drive is named e.g. mount /dev/ad1s1a / Good luck! Tamouh _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------- Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 00:59:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200A816A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:59:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@rithy4u.net) Received: from ix.khmerserver.net (ix.khmerserver.net [203.82.224.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D9B43D49 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:59:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@rithy4u.net) Received: from [192.168.2.112] ([192.168.1.33]) by ix.khmerserver.net (rithy4uSpamAppliance) with ESMTP id kAN0sYH9005311 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:54:38 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from root@rithy4u.net) YGLCResent-Message-Id: <200611230054.kAN0sYH9005311@ix.khmerserver.net> YGLCMessage-Id: <200611230054.kAN0sYH9005311@ix.khmerserver.net> Message-ID: <4564F222.5020209@rithy4u.net> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:58:10 +0700 From: "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" Organization: rithy4u.NET User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-YGMC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-YGMC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-YGMC-MailScanner-From: root@rithy4u.net X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:59:44 -0000 Does FreeBSD support newer SATA RAID Controller? What software to make RAID 1? or someone know which SATA RAID Controller can support hardware mirror? -- *Rithy Ray, RCSA* Chief Executive Officer Web: www.rithy4u.net Email: info@rithy4u.net Phone: (855) 12 403 001 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by rithy4uSpamAppliance, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 01:18:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F52616A412 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F97243D46 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:17:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98BA1A3C1C; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF8BB513F4; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:17:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:17:51 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061123011751.GA45406@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061122165238.GA37819@xor.obsecurity.org> <200611221902.TAA14770@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611221902.TAA14770@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:18:07 -0000 --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:02:54AM +0000, Dieter wrote: > In message <20061122165238.GA37819@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway wri= tes: >=20 > > > > I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if th= e di=3D > > sks > > > > are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, s= o no > > > > one process "blocks", but they're all a little slower. > > >=3D20 > > > I collected a bit of data: > > >=3D20 > > > While copying a large file from disk1 to disk2, > > >=3D20 > > > time ls on a small directory on disk3 (not cached in memory) > > >=3D20 > > > real 0m0.032s > > > user 0m0.000s > > > sys 0m0.003s > > >=3D20 > > > time ls on a small directory on disk2 > > >=3D20 > > > real 4m51.911s > > > user 0m0.000s > > > sys 0m0.002s > > >=3D20 > > > I expect access to a busy disk to take longer, but 5 minutes is > > > a bit much. And that's the root directory of the filesystem, > > > it didn't have to follow a long chain of directories to get there. > > >=3D20 > > > Sometimes I see long delays when accessing disk3, but it is > > > behaving at the moment. > >=20 > > ls still has to acquire a number of locks in order to be sure that the > > contents of the directory aren't changing. If there are lots of other > > processes all competing for these locks, it will be slow. It looks > > like that's the case on your system, although details of your workload > > have been trimmed from your email. >=20 > In telnet window 1: >=20 > cd /disk1/ > cp -ip very_big_file /disk2/bar/ (the workload) >=20 > In telnet window 2: >=20 > time ls /disk3/foo1/ (make sure time and ls are cached in memory) > time ls /disk3/foo2/ (see timing numbers above) > time ls /disk2/ (see timing numbers above) >=20 > The /disk2/ directory is small, only contains 3 directories and .snap >=20 > Would the cp into /disk2/bar/ lock the /disk2/ directory? It shouldn't do. What scheduler are you using? Kris --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZPa/Wry0BWjoQKURArEdAJ43LEv5rl7/RIf8VevDcwfXcJhRdQCgvjzh /rfxDl6M2NDXh3ctXl/m7UA= =AxZ1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 01:19:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8390E16A40F for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3254243D62 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:18:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D444B1A3C1C; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:19:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B443F515FB; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:19:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:19:12 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jamie Message-ID: <20061123011912.GB45406@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061122111131.U19707@floyd.gnulife.org> <20061122202041.GA40610@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061122145124.B21681@floyd.gnulife.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061122145124.B21681@floyd.gnulife.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:19:28 -0000 --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:05:04PM -0600, Jamie wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote: > > > > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > > > I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler > > > seems to be referencing mntent.h and the compilation fails with: > > > > > > from /usr/include/mntent.h:2, > > > from ../../../gcc-4.0.3/libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:97: > > > /usr/include/mntent.h:2:20: error: #include nested too deeply > > > > > > > > > I am compiling this with gcc 2.95 and gnu make 3.80. > > > > > > Does anyone know why it's trying to include mntent.h? From what I've > > > read, this is a system V header file, so I can't understand why . Are > > > there any switches I should be passing to make? > > > > Why not use the FreeBSD port? >=20 >=20 > Because learning how to use some of the other tools outside the scope of > the ports tree is kind of interesting, imho. I'd like to learn more about > gcc and other tools for building software in FreeBSD, even if its just a > purely academic pursuit. >=20 > I guess working on a layer lower than the ports collection adds some > satisfaction to my curiousity. >=20 > There are those who use their cars solely for transportation, and others > who enjoy restoring them/taking them apart/modifying them. I think the > same kind of principles apply. Those just using their vehicles for > transportation scratch their heads and wonder why anyone would have an > interest in anything other than hassle free service. OK, but your car has apparently caught caught fire, and you're standing right next to a free bus stop :-) Kris --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZPcQWry0BWjoQKURAsHRAJ0eMVuI4932g3rsMhU4uPJd2eCKNwCeOw0h rCzVaj3zOwjcOCPAp7AxFyc= =wp2f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 01:29:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6855116A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snb@threerings.net) Received: from smtp.earth.threerings.net (mail.threerings.net [64.127.109.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6649743D45 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:28:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snb@threerings.net) Received: from [192.168.54.42] (chukchi.sea.earth.threerings.net [192.168.54.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.earth.threerings.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0089C65E9 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:29:19 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <2D20DE54-9851-4310-9FEB-D659ADD413B1@threerings.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Nick Barkas Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:29:26 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Subject: Problems opening, viewing, and manipulating PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:29:22 -0000 Hello Since around last Friday the 17th, I have been having some difficulty working with FreeBSD problem reports. I'm not sure if this has something to do with the FreeBSD.org systems being moved that day or if it's just a coincidence. Anyway, I have opened two PRs, ports/105652 three days ago and just today ports/105760, that I received no email confirmation upon opening, as I have with PRs in the past. I filed them using send-pr, and the system they were sent from says in its mail logs that the messages were delivered to mx1.freebsd.org successfully. I only found the PR numbers by seeing the reports in the archives for the freebsd- ports-bugs list. I cannot find them using http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ query-pr.cgi or http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi. Additionally, I've sent I think four emails now to bug- followup@freebsd.org trying to update the audit trail with a patch on another PR I opened, ports/105563. I've tried from a couple of different systems, and my mail logs again indicate that the messages were delivered successfully to mx1.freebsd.org. Earlier on the 17th, before I started having any problems, I was able to add a patch on yet another PR I have, ports/105560, so this problem is also a new one. Has anyone else had similar problems like this? Are there any better, more effective ways for non-committers to open, view, or manipulate PRs than by using send-pr, the web interface on the FreeBSD site, or emails to bug-followup@freebsd.org, respectively? Is there somewhere better to ask these questions than this list? Thanks very much! Nick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 01:37:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B51C16A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD87643D45 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:37:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so675786nfc for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:37:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ouIGvLXuMR0miA06MPjhb7maVR7ogQhBkDdQSK3Ta8PzPxgRdC1o81Jm0e9UruLmRveca5rcdYTts1K824PlkoWvCL8Do6kNOMxxVTNiJbDikkPg3DK/rfoAcB3OuZsEkE96pz2FEg0lQsT+ZTNnZaYGxxjp88R8ISKRP8eu5ic= Received: by 10.82.118.2 with SMTP id q2mr1341800buc.1164245872834; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:37:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.178.5 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:37:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51d7a5160611221737m71483da6s2326f8e8358ef1c0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:37:52 -0800 From: perikillo To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: External HD create different slice on /dev which one i need to mount...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:37:55 -0000 Hi people. I have one external HD: umass0: Prolific Technology Inc. Mass Storage Device, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 umass0:0:0:-1: Attached to scbus0 (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): error 22 (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Unretryable Error pass0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 pass0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device pass0: 40.000MB/s transfers GEOM: new disk da0 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: 238475MB (488397168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30401C) Ok i setup the HD with sysinstall and format all the disk to UFS2, this is my entry on /dev crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 102 Nov 14 16:39 da0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 103 Nov 14 16:39 da0s1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 86 Nov 14 16:39 da0s1c crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 87 Nov 14 16:39 da0s1d Now which one i need to mount each time i need to use this HD...? I create one mount point, /ext, FreeBSD the first time use /dev/da0s1d, them if i want to mount that one, it send this message: WARNING: /ext was not properly dismounted No metter which one i use, da0s1, da0s1c, da0s1d always send this message, this is normal...? mount /dev/da0s1 /ext mount /dev/da0s1c /ext mount /dev/da0s1d /ext Always: WARNING: /ext was not properly dismounted Any idea about this...? Im using FreeBSD 6.1-p10, my machine has 6 USB ports i have been testing with all and the same message. Thanks all for your time!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 02:13:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3329A16A522 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:13:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-237-189.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.237.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE29743D5E for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:13:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAN2Dj4d011590 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:13:45 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kAN2DjCt011587 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:13:45 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id CAA03777; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:12:06 GMT Message-Id: <200611230212.CAA03777@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:17:51 EST." <20061123011751.GA45406@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:12:06 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:13:52 -0000 In message <20061123011751.GA45406@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway writes: > > --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:02:54AM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > In message <20061122165238.GA37819@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway wri= > tes: > >=20 > > > > > I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if th= > e di=3D > > > sks > > > > > are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, s= > o no > > > > > one process "blocks", but they're all a little slower. > > > >=3D20 > > > > I collected a bit of data: > > > >=3D20 > > > > While copying a large file from disk1 to disk2, > > > >=3D20 > > > > time ls on a small directory on disk3 (not cached in memory) > > > >=3D20 > > > > real 0m0.032s > > > > user 0m0.000s > > > > sys 0m0.003s > > > >=3D20 > > > > time ls on a small directory on disk2 > > > >=3D20 > > > > real 4m51.911s > > > > user 0m0.000s > > > > sys 0m0.002s > > > >=3D20 > > > > I expect access to a busy disk to take longer, but 5 minutes is > > > > a bit much. And that's the root directory of the filesystem, > > > > it didn't have to follow a long chain of directories to get there. > > > >=3D20 > > > > Sometimes I see long delays when accessing disk3, but it is > > > > behaving at the moment. > > >=20 > > > ls still has to acquire a number of locks in order to be sure that the > > > contents of the directory aren't changing. If there are lots of other > > > processes all competing for these locks, it will be slow. It looks > > > like that's the case on your system, although details of your workload > > > have been trimmed from your email. > >=20 > > In telnet window 1: > >=20 > > cd /disk1/ > > cp -ip very_big_file /disk2/bar/ (the workload) > >=20 > > In telnet window 2: > >=20 > > time ls /disk3/foo1/ (make sure time and ls are cached in memory) > > time ls /disk3/foo2/ (see timing numbers above) > > time ls /disk2/ (see timing numbers above) > >=20 > > The /disk2/ directory is small, only contains 3 directories and .snap > >=20 > > Would the cp into /disk2/bar/ lock the /disk2/ directory? > > It shouldn't do. > > What scheduler are you using? kern.sched.name: 4BSD kern.sched.quantum: 100000 kern.sched.preemption: 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 02:27:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E0216A412 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C8143D45 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:26:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 9219 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2006 13:27:00 +1100 Received: from 218-214-43-14.people.net.au (HELO localhost) (218.214.43.14) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 Nov 2006 13:27:00 +1100 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:26:57 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: David Horis Message-ID: <20061123132657.224f8be8@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20061122222224.6309.qmail@web58807.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <20061122222224.6309.qmail@web58807.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mount and repair HD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:27:01 -0000 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:22:24 -0800 (PST) David Horis wrote: > Hello, > > A Snap Server 1100 just died on me... (Single drive, FreeBSD-based, I > think...) > > I think it's not HD related as I can't even get into to the hardware/bios > reset mode. > > Have you folks ever heard of anyone opening one of these things up and > mounting the drive on a regular PC? > > Since the drive probably has some coruption, due to the MB/OS crash, how > would I go about fixing those before I mount the drive and try to copy off > the files? > > Since I am not familiar with *nix, can someone point me to a walk through on > this? (Is there a FreeBSD live CD I could use?) Hi there, I'm not sure about the 1100, but the 4500 run Linux inside ( 4 drives though). definitely nothing fancy inside ( i actually reused one of them for a mail server using gentoo, as fbsd would not like the IDE controllers ).. I would just give the HD a try in some other box... if you want a fbsd live cd, try freesbie.org good luck _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Always do right. This will gratify some and astonish the rest." Mark Twain I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 02:31:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8667B16A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01ABB43D46 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:31:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 9570 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2006 13:31:55 +1100 Received: from 218-214-43-14.people.net.au (HELO localhost) (218.214.43.14) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 Nov 2006 13:31:55 +1100 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:31:48 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: perikillo Message-ID: <20061123133148.146a3df1@localhost> In-Reply-To: <51d7a5160611221737m71483da6s2326f8e8358ef1c0@mail.gmail.com> References: <51d7a5160611221737m71483da6s2326f8e8358ef1c0@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: External HD create different slice on /dev which one i need to mount...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:31:56 -0000 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:37:52 -0800 perikillo wrote: > mount /dev/da0s1 /ext this is the slice, dont use it > mount /dev/da0s1c /ext this is the raw partition, DONT use c - ever, unless u really (think you) know what you are doing > mount /dev/da0s1d /ext bing > > Always: WARNING: /ext was not properly dismounted > > Any idea about this...? yes, last time you mounted da0s1d , u didnt unmounted it cleanly. Before you mount, you should run fsck -p on it: (as root, or with sudo) fsck -p -t ufs /dev/da0s1d > > Im using FreeBSD 6.1-p10, my machine has 6 USB ports i have been testing > with all and the same message. of course, it is nothing to do with the usb itself, it's a filesystem issue. _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." Hunter S. Thompson I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 02:37:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D708716A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAB043D45 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7954B1A3C19; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:37:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 801F651438; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:37:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:37:33 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061123023733.GA46545@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061123011751.GA45406@xor.obsecurity.org> <200611230212.CAA03777@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611230212.CAA03777@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:37:48 -0000 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:12:06PM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > > > > time ls on a small directory on disk2 > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > real 4m51.911s > > > > > user 0m0.000s > > > > > sys 0m0.002s > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > I expect access to a busy disk to take longer, but 5 minutes is > > > > > a bit much. And that's the root directory of the filesystem, > > > > > it didn't have to follow a long chain of directories to get there. > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > Sometimes I see long delays when accessing disk3, but it is > > > > > behaving at the moment. > > > >=3D20 > > > > ls still has to acquire a number of locks in order to be sure that = the > > > > contents of the directory aren't changing. If there are lots of ot= her > > > > processes all competing for these locks, it will be slow. It looks > > > > like that's the case on your system, although details of your workl= oad > > > > have been trimmed from your email. > > >=3D20 > > > In telnet window 1: > > >=3D20 > > > cd /disk1/ > > > cp -ip very_big_file /disk2/bar/ (the workload) > > >=3D20 > > > In telnet window 2: > > >=3D20 > > > time ls /disk3/foo1/ (make sure time and ls are cached in memory) > > > time ls /disk3/foo2/ (see timing numbers above) > > > time ls /disk2/ (see timing numbers above) > > >=3D20 > > > The /disk2/ directory is small, only contains 3 directories and .snap > > >=3D20 > > > Would the cp into /disk2/bar/ lock the /disk2/ directory? > >=20 > > It shouldn't do. > >=20 > > What scheduler are you using? >=20 > kern.sched.name: 4BSD > kern.sched.quantum: 100000 > kern.sched.preemption: 1 OK, that's correct. Can you also provide details of your disk hardware (e.g. dmesg) and kernel configuration? Kris --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZQlsWry0BWjoQKURAuWDAKDesSahKkM6WQQtZba4gCnt98GypACg0fZC RhaVgBrzJ/kVucwygUIzeec= =kfK5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 03:28:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35DC16A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4520943D5D for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:27:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so700333nfc for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:28:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=cwoX5LbSQNYYaDGDV/tvjvzY9wtS38BqqE8GbE2Nanl2kvA98AlfGP707Rp9f6HMUUMYtEndS4TgGFTO66MWtem24Yc+iaFXMfZuDulre8sZ144Ek4ulnrSD6gBpIUWJ1pmh4VlbFnmhRZ8IBGdlt7YGQ/phEyT5glj5XGGvA7M= Received: by 10.82.106.14 with SMTP id e14mr819713buc.1164252507788; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:28:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.18 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:28:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5aaed53f0611221928v7fcf349cub5d094496fcb770e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:28:27 -0600 From: "Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T" Sender: dundeemt@gmail.com To: "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" In-Reply-To: <4564F222.5020209@rithy4u.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4564F222.5020209@rithy4u.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e05d07511418166e Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:28:30 -0000 On 11/22/06, Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET wrote: > Does FreeBSD support newer SATA RAID Controller? What software to make > RAID 1? or someone know which SATA RAID Controller can support hardware > mirror? > > -- > *Rithy Ray, RCSA* > Chief Executive Officer > Web: www.rithy4u.net > Email: info@rithy4u.net > Phone: (855) 12 403 001 > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by rithy4uSpamAppliance, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Newer RAID controllers -- Yes, see the h/w compat listing on the freebsd site Software RAID 1 - easy, gmirror. see http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html for more Pretty much any controller that supports FreeBSD supports mirroring. -- Jeff Hinrichs Dundee Media & Technology, Inc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 03:36:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FD416A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A264C43D55 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:36:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so702386nfc for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:36:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=PcUtkbrf3CCfpI4GiJueHVIzyrqiEMSpURN9Mbt256R5Htv4WcJmT7K8FRMHP/BUc+J08+5SGTNI2H1g+6XGczvsbgxEmbsQCDqXmr0BL4PhBUMbS9FRCFTd3Nza0UsFsJdBmB9ws1eE/quohTIPC8eiKDCK2zSh1RwHynA8Ruk= Received: by 10.82.182.8 with SMTP id e8mr974929buf.1164253017497; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:36:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.175.1 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:36:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:36:57 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Old Ranger" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DSL (was: Advice please) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:36:59 -0000 On 11/22/06, Old Ranger wrote: > The advice I'd like, is some "do's" and "don'ts" when switching from > dial-up to DSL with FreeBSD. Not to sound overly arch, but a generic subject is not going to garner you nearly as much help as something specific. It would also depend on whether you are going to be using PPoE or not, but I would mostly be concerned about keeping up on security updates if you are going to be leaving your machine connected most or all of the time. This might also be a good time to start reading up on firewalls and packet filters. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 03:49:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE58D16A47B for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-237-189.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.237.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AAC43D45 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:48:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAN3nGDK013652 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:49:16 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kAN3nGZP013649 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:49:16 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id DAA04594; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:41:46 GMT Message-Id: <200611230341.DAA04594@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:37:33 EST." <20061123023733.GA46545@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:41:46 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:49:19 -0000 > > > > > > time ls on a small directory on disk2 > > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > > real 4m51.911s > > > > > > user 0m0.000s > > > > > > sys 0m0.002s > > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > > I expect access to a busy disk to take longer, but 5 minutes is > > > > > > a bit much. And that's the root directory of the filesystem, > > > > > > it didn't have to follow a long chain of directories to get there. > > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > > Sometimes I see long delays when accessing disk3, but it is > > > > > > behaving at the moment. > > > > >=3D20 > > > > > ls still has to acquire a number of locks in order to be sure that = > the > > > > > contents of the directory aren't changing. If there are lots of ot= > her > > > > > processes all competing for these locks, it will be slow. It looks > > > > > like that's the case on your system, although details of your workl= > oad > > > > > have been trimmed from your email. > > > >=3D20 > > > > In telnet window 1: > > > >=3D20 > > > > cd /disk1/ > > > > cp -ip very_big_file /disk2/bar/ (the workload) > > > >=3D20 > > > > In telnet window 2: > > > >=3D20 > > > > time ls /disk3/foo1/ (make sure time and ls are cached in memory) > > > > time ls /disk3/foo2/ (see timing numbers above) > > > > time ls /disk2/ (see timing numbers above) > > > >=3D20 > > > > The /disk2/ directory is small, only contains 3 directories and .snap > > > >=3D20 > > > > Would the cp into /disk2/bar/ lock the /disk2/ directory? > > >=20 > > > It shouldn't do. > > >=20 > > > What scheduler are you using? > >=20 > > kern.sched.name: 4BSD > > kern.sched.quantum: 100000 > > kern.sched.preemption: 1 > > OK, that's correct. Can you also provide details of your disk > hardware (e.g. dmesg) and kernel configuration? FreeBSD 6.0 Kernel is stock except for addition of: device atapicam # needed to burn dvd /boot/loader.conf: console="comconsole" hw.ata.wc=0 hw.ata.atapi_dma="1" kern.ipc.nmbclusters="256000" Mainboard: Tyan Tomcat k8e 2865 CPU: AMD64 3000+ Chipset: Nvidia nforce4 ultra Memory: 2 GB DDR400 ECC Disks: 4x Seagate 7200 rpm SATA 1x Seagate 7200 rpm PATA 1x LG CD/DVD atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xe000-0xe00f at device 6.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0x9f0-0x9f7,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x970-0x977,0xb70-0xb73,0xcc00-0xcc0f mem 0xfebfb000-0xfebfbfff irq 10 at device 7.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 atapci2: port 0x9e0-0x9e7,0xbe0-0xbe3,0x960-0x967,0xb60-0xb63,0xb800-0xb80f mem 0xfebfa000-0xfebfafff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci0 ata4: on atapci2 ata5: on atapci2 acd0: DVDR at ata0-master UDMA66 ad2: 305245MB at ata1-master UDMA100 ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 238475MB at ata3-master SATA150 ad8: 238475MB at ata4-master SATA150 ad10: 305245MB at ata5-master SATA150 cd0 at ata0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 05:26:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2646616A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731AE43D5C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:25:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id QAA07696; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:25:04 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:25:03 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: vittorio In-Reply-To: <20061123011938.6505416A596@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW & NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:26:10 -0000 vittorio wrote: > I have two FreeBSD 6.1 boxes one of which (IP 10.0.0.1) is an NFS server and > the other one (IP 10.0.0.2) is, among other things, an NFS client sharing > directories with the NFS server. > It all works correctly and I can mount_nfs all the directories from the > server. > BUT, I'm now trying to use an IPFW firewall both on the server and on the > client. My simple aim is to setup connections between the 10.0.0.1 server and > the 10.0.0.2 client ** only **; no connections should be possible with other > clients! > Now I've tried the poor documentation I could find googling with the > keywords "freebsd ipfw nfs" to no avail, I cannot mount_nfs any share on te > client because something goes wrong with RPC. > Concentrating on the client side (no ipfw for the moment on teh server) I > tried the following > > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 2049,111,1022 to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0 setup > keep-state > > OR > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.0.2 2049,111,1022 via fxp0 setup > keep-state > > OR > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 2049,111,1022 to me via fxp0 setup > keep-state > > OR > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 to me 2049,111,1022 via fxp0 setup > keep-state > > If I disable the firewall it all goes smootly. Firstly, what Chuck and Bill said .. but some further points .. Secondly, you don't specify port numbers with 'allow ip', which covers tcp, udp and raw ip packets also; you want 'allow udp' here, unless of course you're using NFS over TCP as well, where you'd need 'allow tcp'. Note also that 'setup' only applies to TCP connections. Thirdly, if you do want to use stateful rules on the client, you'll do better doing them on your _outbound_ connections, something like: ipfw add xxx allow udp from ${client} to ${server} ${nfsports} keep-state If it were me I'd concentrate on the server side firewall rules (and /etc/exports allowed hosts) both for allowing desired and disallowing undesired connections, so not having to worry much about what client/s may or may not be doing. 'man ipfw' is actually pretty good documentation, though there is a fair bit to absorb there. I still read it before bedtime now and again :) Ciao, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 05:32:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FDA16A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:32:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CE643D4C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so728240nfc for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:32:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Hill74OsL6Q14ZMxtbnACjVw+XuEIDdVLRe4J6rYXz46Wnr8CiAmvfvKskcO6LTaue/7FJpDNMdbEck1yoEkG5309X/NkREBNSenBNkqcPqY/r+BMhy03S7NSsBeeTKszLDjFnT0RnUQj9BEz2JlHULetYL1Ikt/qoKU83kcc4w= Received: by 10.82.129.8 with SMTP id b8mr1367131bud.1164259964756; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:32:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.178.5 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:32:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51d7a5160611222132s73b93f72q7d5298e427721cf2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:32:44 -0800 From: perikillo To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <20061123133148.146a3df1@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51d7a5160611221737m71483da6s2326f8e8358ef1c0@mail.gmail.com> <20061123133148.146a3df1@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: External HD create different slice on /dev which one i need to mount...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:32:47 -0000 On 11/22/06, Norberto Meijome wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:37:52 -0800 > perikillo wrote: > > > mount /dev/da0s1 /ext > this is the slice, dont use it > > mount /dev/da0s1c /ext > this is the raw partition, DONT use c - ever, unless u really (think you) > know > what you are doing > > > mount /dev/da0s1d /ext > > bing > > > > > Always: WARNING: /ext was not properly dismounted > > > > Any idea about this...? > > yes, last time you mounted da0s1d , u didnt unmounted it cleanly. Before > you > mount, you should run fsck -p on it: > (as root, or with sudo) > > fsck -p -t ufs /dev/da0s1d > > > > > > Im using FreeBSD 6.1-p10, my machine has 6 USB ports i have been testing > > with all and the same message. > > of course, it is nothing to do with the usb itself, it's a filesystem > issue. > _________________________ > {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome > > "The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic > hallway > where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also > a > negative side." Hunter S. Thompson > > I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when > wet. > Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have > been > Warned. > Thanks Norberto for your answer i got it, right now im testing the HD on my laptop, is working really good. See you!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 06:09:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9016516A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064AF43D5F for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:09:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E5E1A3C1C; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:09:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6E0551CC4; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:09:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:09:31 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061123060929.GA49798@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061123023733.GA46545@xor.obsecurity.org> <200611230341.DAA04594@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611230341.DAA04594@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:09:48 -0000 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:41:46PM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > oad > > > > > > have been trimmed from your email. > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > In telnet window 1: > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > cd /disk1/ > > > > > cp -ip very_big_file /disk2/bar/ (the workload) > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > In telnet window 2: > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > time ls /disk3/foo1/ (make sure time and ls are cached in memory) > > > > > time ls /disk3/foo2/ (see timing numbers above) > > > > > time ls /disk2/ (see timing numbers above) > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > The /disk2/ directory is small, only contains 3 directories and .= snap > > > > >=3D3D20 > > > > > Would the cp into /disk2/bar/ lock the /disk2/ directory? > > > >=3D20 > > > > It shouldn't do. > > > >=3D20 > > > > What scheduler are you using? > > >=3D20 > > > kern.sched.name: 4BSD > > > kern.sched.quantum: 100000 > > > kern.sched.preemption: 1 > >=20 > > OK, that's correct. Can you also provide details of your disk > > hardware (e.g. dmesg) and kernel configuration? >=20 > FreeBSD 6.0 >=20 > Kernel is stock except for addition of: >=20 > device atapicam # needed to burn dvd >=20 > /boot/loader.conf: >=20 > console=3D"comconsole" > hw.ata.wc=3D0 ^^^^^^^^^^^ "Make my hard drive go reeeeally slow please (just in case I crash)" :) Kris --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZTsZWry0BWjoQKURAivGAJ4t9MbCDncATQysDUXe3997AhHeHQCeMeGX C/Zp/AYToyFMwqqbWobvyHM= =gmWJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 06:57:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C483516A417 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.kobal@arctur.si) Received: from cygnus.arctur.si (cygnus.arctur.si [193.77.181.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95ED43D4C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:56:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko.kobal@arctur.si) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by cygnus.arctur.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9B7CB6827; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:57:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from cygnus.arctur.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cygnus.arctur.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57732-10; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:57:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (BSN-77-124-79.dsl.siol.net [193.77.124.79]) by cygnus.arctur.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EECCB6818; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:57:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45654657.40602@arctur.si> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:57:27 +0100 From: Marko Kobal User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tamouh H." References: <20061122224521.BDA78CB6818@cygnus.arctur.si> In-Reply-To: <20061122224521.BDA78CB6818@cygnus.arctur.si> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0650-1, 22.11.2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at arctur.si Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: additional processor in IBM xSeries /ii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:57:28 -0000 Hi, >> I have an IBM xSeries 225 with two-processor motherboard, >> currently with only one Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. OS is 6.1p10, >> otherwise is this an apache22-mysql50-php5 web server. >> >> I would like to add an additional, second Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz. >> Do I have to change anything in OS, kernel, etc, before this >> step or can I just plug in the additional proc and thats it? >> >> -- >> Kind regards, Marko Kobal. >> _______________________________________________ > > Recompile Kernel with SMP option (check /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SMP) OK, so I recompile kernel with: # To make an SMP kernel, the next line is needed options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel And this will not affect (after reboot) on how system will behave BEFORE I actualy plug in another processor? Are there any other options that may be added to optimize kernel for SMP? -- Kind regards, Marko Kobal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 07:31:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF8016A412 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:31:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-237-189.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.237.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5079943DA1 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:30:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAN7VGhY015298 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:31:17 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kAN7VGX0015295 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:31:16 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id HAA05509; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:29:16 GMT Message-Id: <200611230729.HAA05509@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:09:31 EST." <20061123060929.GA49798@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:29:16 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:31:37 -0000 > > hw.ata.wc=3D0 > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > "Make my hard drive go reeeeally slow please (just in case I crash)" :) Slower, yes, but not *that* slow. Normal ls : 0.032 second. Two processes using same disk, multiply by two, so 0.064 second. Maybe the multiplier is more than 2, call it 10x, so 0.32 second. But I'm seeing a factor of over 9100x. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 07:49:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E8A16A40F for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:49:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rberens@osirion.nl) Received: from server1.nedstars.nl (adam80.dsdeurne.nl [82.150.128.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CB343D5D for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:48:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rberens@osirion.nl) Received: (qmail 1721 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2006 08:49:00 +0100 Received: from n010019.nbs.netland.nl (HELO RBE4) (217.170.45.50) by adam80.dsdeurne.nl with SMTP; 23 Nov 2006 08:49:00 +0100 Message-ID: <002c01c70ed3$db2d0ec0$6500a8c0@RBE4> From: "Rob Berens" To: Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:48:38 +0100 Organization: Osirion B.V. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Subject: Need help with IPv4/IPv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:49:05 -0000 This is a repost of an earlier message. I have some problems that seem to be related to the interoperation of ipv4 client programs and ipv6 servers or the other way round. Does anyone have some examples of how to configere FreeBSD to have a smooth interoperation of IPv4 and IPv6? What lines do I have to add to /etc/rc.conf. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE. My problems are listed below. Does anyone have some simple I have the following problems: MySQL and JDBC client -------------------------- I run MySQL 5.1 server at the FreeBSD machine. The msyql jconnecter version is 5.0.4. Via netstat I can see MySQL run as a tcp4 server only. When connecting to mysql from the server running mysql via the mysql client program everything works as expected. When connecting from a remote machine running ipv4 via both the mysql clent program and via JDBC again everything works as expected. When connecting from the server running mysql via JDBC I get the exception: com.mysql.jdbc.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure due to underlying exception: java.net.SocketException: java.netConnectionException: Connection refused Jetty (org.mortbay.org) ----------------------- When running jetty as a servelet engine/web server at the FreeBSD machine. I cannot connect to the server from a remote machine running IPv4. Via netstat I can see that jetty runs as a tcp6 server only. SVN (subversion.tigirs.org) --------------------------- Originally I had a simular problem connecting to svn from a ipv4 machine, when svn was running as a tcp6 server. Via a strange startup option (--listen-host=0.0.0.0) I could force svn to run as tcp4. And connection from the remote host worked fine. Tomcat -------- I installed tomcat 5.5.20 from the BSD port. Tomcat does not start. The log files shows the following: Nov 6, 2006 8:22:39 AM org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener lifecycleEvent INFO: The Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal performance in production environments was not found on the java.library.path: /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/client:/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386:/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/../lib/i386:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib Nov 6, 2006 8:22:40 AM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol init INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080 Nov 6, 2006 8:22:40 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina load INFO: Initialization processed in 1303 ms Nov 6, 2006 8:22:40 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService start INFO: Starting service Catalina Nov 6, 2006 8:22:40 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/5.5.20 Nov 6, 2006 8:22:40 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost start INFO: XML validation disabled Nov 6, 2006 8:22:41 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log INFO: org.apache.webapp.balancer.BalancerFilter: init(): ruleChain: [org.apache.webapp.balancer.RuleChain: [org.apache.webapp.balancer.rules.URLStringMatchRule: Target string: News / Redirect URL: http://www.cnn.com], [org.apache.webapp.balancer.rules.RequestParameterRule: Target param name: paramName / Target param value: paramValue / Redirect URL: http://www.yahoo.com], [org.apache.webapp.balancer.rules.AcceptEverythingRule: Redirect URL: http://jakarta.apache.org]] Nov 6, 2006 8:22:41 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log INFO: ContextListener: contextInitialized() Nov 6, 2006 8:22:41 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log INFO: SessionListener: contextInitialized() Nov 6, 2006 8:22:41 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log INFO: ContextListener: contextInitialized() Nov 6, 2006 8:22:41 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log INFO: SessionListener: contextInitialized() Nov 6, 2006 8:22:42 AM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol start INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080 Nov 6, 2006 8:22:42 AM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init INFO: JK: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009 Nov 6, 2006 8:22:42 AM org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/33 config=null Nov 6, 2006 8:22:42 AM org.apache.catalina.storeconfig.StoreLoader load INFO: Find registry server-registry.xml at classpath resource Nov 6, 2006 8:22:42 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start INFO: Server startup in 2196 ms Nov 6, 2006 8:22:42 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer await SEVERE: StandardServer.await: create[8005]: java.net.BindException: Can't assign requested address at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.bind(PlainSocketImpl.java:359) at java.net.ServerSocket.bind(ServerSocket.java:319) at java.net.ServerSocket.(ServerSocket.java:185) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.await(StandardServer.java:372) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.await(Catalina.java:615) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:575) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:294) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:432) Has anyone got any ideas what is wrong and how to solve these problems? Is there a way to force the server to only run ipv4 or to force some programs to run ipv4? Please help! Rob Berens _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 07:52:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9FF16A40F for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:52:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C0143D81 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:51:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5351A3C19; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:52:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 27DCD5158B; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:52:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:52:15 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061123075214.GA51991@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061123060929.GA49798@xor.obsecurity.org> <200611230729.HAA05509@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611230729.HAA05509@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:52:45 -0000 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:29:16PM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > > hw.ata.wc=3D3D0 > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > "Make my hard drive go reeeeally slow please (just in case I crash)" :) >=20 > Slower, yes, but not *that* slow. >=20 > Normal ls : 0.032 second. Two processes using same disk, multiply by two, > so 0.064 second. Maybe the multiplier is more than 2, call it 10x, so > 0.32 second. But I'm seeing a factor of over 9100x. Humour me and turn it back on, then see what happens. Kris --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZVMuWry0BWjoQKURAoUmAKCJu4fUOcJSKt1H053/+PkpLnj4DwCg0vwZ +HnKbh9d13X4qA/YvRdRtIk= =N3X/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 08:56:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102AE16A47E for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8331843D68 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:55:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so261862pyh for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:56:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=HgEHwgwu35OxYrkGS1WaV2qQ/Kx5OMQ98XCilvNprcWwZKGEB/lcmeAWKxK3/9w3SBUDa97GSlM+Y3m1JTyzTottjKsgobMJNwBT97URaR0UIsAGK7YnYC9UlpdUNPVm2333XemZVfmt8nDWNg9Njqfzj/AUNUArIm26QVqKguE= Received: by 10.35.69.11 with SMTP id w11mr2927549pyk.1164272183640; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:56:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:56:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:56:23 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Jerry McAllister" In-Reply-To: <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:56:25 -0000 So, does it mean that Windows 2003 Server provides more Password Level Security with Unauthorized Access? And how can one into the System by booting from a CD if it still requires the Password even in Single User mode? On 11/22/06, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:41:37AM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly > appreciated. > > > > I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? > > > > I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in > single > > user mode and steal the data? > > How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in single user mode, it > > still demands the password and without password one cannot do anything? > > or make it possible that booting in Single user mode, doesn't provide > any > > shell? > > Lock it in a box. Anyone who can put their hands physically can > get in to the machine with a little tinkering even if you disable > lots of software. > > I think you can get rid of the single user option in the boot, > but anyone with a CD can defeat that if they want to. It would > make things harder for yourself in managing the system, but it > would slow a person down from casual interference. > > Also, many machines have BIOS level boot passwords that can be turned > on. Using that would slow a person down, but be annoying for youself, > especially in times such as power failures - the system would not come > back up automatically without someone entering the BIOS password. > > Plus, if a person is determined enough, they can defeat that as well > by removing the battery backup for the MB or the flash memory. But, > it would stop casual tinkering. > > ////jerry > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > -- > > > > BR / vj > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 09:04:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6BF16A412 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6EB43D6B for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:04:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so263144pyh for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:04:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Lv/1EJMig88+tZr3u4Qg6FMqyc7FFWDnJjEPX/fCIIrRASeBswGf5KtCnof0BDSp9rZVxOUQ2paQzwckqyDrFsuPX75oMwIJPxoykYey85N63W/uqGEI+xGFu+8jzer7+/5Cca7/v0lCMx2m1rXWAE+IHtQKD/KyMo/g3uJI5QU= Received: by 10.35.38.17 with SMTP id q17mr2943733pyj.1164272683662; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:04:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:04:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611230104o5b13d40dqc1daf57e5445f2b1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:04:43 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Svein Halvor Halvorsen" In-Reply-To: <45648854.1070002@lvor.halvorsen.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611220553y5d56689es1468b949448bf1e6@mail.gmail.com> <45645904.8090108@orchid.homeunix.org> <2cd0a0da0611220704vca1718w3427551d57f3a702@mail.gmail.com> <45648854.1070002@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: To which port GPG belongs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:04:44 -0000 On 11/22/06, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > > VeeJay wrote: > > I have this Help Instructions from a Step-by-Step for Apache > installation > > On a side note, you would probably want to install Apache via ports. > > > Svein Halvor > > > > If I will install from the Port, how can I configure to add module or disable modules? Like if I want to enable following modules, how can I do them VIA Ports? I Just copy the part of text from this Step-by-Step guide I am using ----------------- Compiling and installing the software In this step we will configure, compile, and install the Apache web server as follows: ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/local/apache2 \ --with-mpm=prefork \ --disable-charset-lite \ --disable-include \ --disable-env \ --disable-setenvif \ --disable-status \ --disable-autoindex \ --disable-asis \ --disable-cgi \ --disable-negotiation \ --disable-imap \ --disable-actions \ --disable-userdir \ --disable-alias \ --disable-so make su umask 022 make install chown -R root:sys /usr/local/apache2 ----------------- If we can configure in Port, so where it could be done and how? and if its in a file, where it would be placed? -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 09:14:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A4716A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E0343D5A for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:13:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAN9D5x9029911 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:13:05 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id kAN9E2GW065034; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:14:02 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:14:02 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: maanjee@gmail.com In-reply-to: <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> (message from VeeJay on Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:56:23 +0100) References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: jerrymc@msu.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:14:03 -0000 > And how can one into the System by booting from a CD if it still > requires the Password even in Single User mode? Booting from CD, floppy or hard disk is slected at BIOS level. Booting in single or multi user mode is at Operating system level. Booting is in the following order: 1) BIOS select what medium to boot from 2) the operating system boot from the selected medium So when it comes to the Single user password, itis already at stage 2) it has passed the stage 1 (booting from hard disk ofr CD) without password. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 09:45:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05CB16A47E for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:45:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5B343D6D for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:44:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so269056pyh for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:45:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZTIXQyPu9A0xq3m6s0laH5qyP+rhXb4Bxcw4oarkvXl6yZl9ztQwaiYStiewh48hG3V0EhqiF6GJgxrDn9j8J0hkCVs2yyNmiZNUrm9kHMS0bVonxKj86YgJLsSj/ccuPLgqLw/MIIuA6Q1UmDPe3nuYHA9x6uDDgbHbFEULcOc= Received: by 10.35.43.10 with SMTP id v10mr3008644pyj.1164275119262; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:45:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:45:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:45:19 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Olivier Nicole" In-Reply-To: <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jerrymc@msu.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:45:20 -0000 On 11/23/06, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > And how can one into the System by booting from a CD if it still > > requires the Password even in Single User mode? > > Booting from CD, floppy or hard disk is slected at BIOS level. > > Booting in single or multi user mode is at Operating system level. > > Booting is in the following order: > > 1) BIOS select what medium to boot from > > 2) the operating system boot from the selected medium > > So when it comes to the Single user password, itis already at stage 2) > it has passed the stage 1 (booting from hard disk ofr CD) without > password. > > Olivier > So, it means, that I should take the following steps 1. Password on BIOS 2. Change the order of booting i.e. When system is installed and working once, then I just the change the Booting FIRST from HardDisk. 3. Put the password on Single User mode. So, what more? Do you people think that I have got somehow security barrier for unauthorized access? -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 10:52:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081C916A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from th.lacoste@wanadoo.fr) Received: from ultra1.univ-paris12.fr (ultra1.univ-paris12.fr [193.51.100.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F8343D6E for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:51:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th.lacoste@wanadoo.fr) Received: from st-simon.miage.univ-paris12.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ultra1.univ-paris12.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kANAq6Nu027019; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:52:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from sirius.miage.univ-paris12.fr (sirius.miage.univ-paris12.fr [194.214.13.28]) by st-simon.miage.univ-paris12.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D2347281A; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:52:06 +0100 (CET) From: Thierry Lacoste To: Jeremy Johnston Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:52:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200611221925.09621.th.lacoste@wanadoo.fr> <4564A6F9.4020501@stormy.smart-serv.net> In-Reply-To: <4564A6F9.4020501@stormy.smart-serv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611231152.06093.th.lacoste@wanadoo.fr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: check_disk_smb: another nagios problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:52:16 -0000 I tried that: define command{ command_name check_disk_smb command_line $USER1$/check_disk_smb -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -s public -w 85% -c 95% } But I still have a CRITICAL error in nagios (Access Denied) On the samba server I have this in log.smbd: [2006/11/23 11:34:26, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(242) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user -H in domain MIAGE to Domain controller CASTOR. Error was NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER. On Wednesday 22 November 2006 20:37, Jeremy Johnston wrote: > I had problems with this at first then I added -w 85% -c 95% to the > command_line and it works great now. > > Thierry Lacoste wrote: > > There is something weird about check_disk_smb from nagios-plugins-1.4.3,1 > > on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10. > > > > From the command line (pwd is /usr/local/libexec/nagios) the switches > > work as expected: > > # ./check_disk_smb -H 194.214.13.140 -s public -u guest -p "" > > Domain=[MIAGE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.22] > > Disk ok - 396M (79%) free on \\194.214.13.140\public > > > > One has the same result without the switches: > > ./check_disk_smb 194.214.13.140 public guest "" > > Domain=[MIAGE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.22] > > Disk ok - 396M (79%) free on \\194.214.13.140\public > > > > But the second form is the only way I can make it work within nagios > > > > define command{ > > command_name check_disk_smb > > command_line $USER1$/check_disk_smb $HOSTADDRESS$ public guest "" > > } > > > > If I introduce the switches (e.g like below) I have all sorts of errors > > (invalid warning threshold, Access denied, etc ...) depending on > > the order of the arguments. > > > > define command{ > > command_name check_disk_smb > > command_line $USER1$/check_disk_smb -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -s public -u > > guest -p "" > > } > > > > Is anybody else seeing this? > > Have I done something wrong? > > > > Regards, > > Thierry. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 11:09:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2149416A415 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F01543D7B for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:08:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-55-202.51-151.net24.it [151.51.202.55]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kANBIxKi081992 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:19:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kANB8UxS054799; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:08:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4565812E.6060604@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:08:30 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <83083882-E193-445F-AF3D-E3ECD1E243B1@hughes.net> <20061111063049.GA81772@xor.obsecurity.org> <608516EC-BBD0-40E7-A773-2E8056981FAA@hughes.net> <20061111195632.GA8718@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20061111195632.GA8718@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: 6.x hangs on AMD64 again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:09:06 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 11:15:54AM -0800, Chris wrote: >>> If your system is hanging then you need to configure additional >>> debugging to figure out the cause. Read the chapter on kernel >>> debugging the developers handbook; without this information no >>> developer can help you. >>> >>> Kris >>> >>> P.S. In my testing SMP amd64 is quite stable even under exceptionally >>> heavy loads, so it's either something related to your hardware or your >>> particular workload. >> Hadn't considered that a user level debugging solution. I'll give it >> a try. >> ... > That is indeed almost always failing hardware. Hello. I think I'm having the same problems. I'm running 6.1(latest patch set)/amd64 on a dual-core Opteron Acer server with SCSI disks and it is hanging completely and suddenly. Checking the hardware was the first thing I did, but it really seems ok (unless it's the second core on the processor). I checked, among the others: the HDs with the vendor's tools, RAM with MemTest86+ and the CPU with different stress tools. If anyone can suggest other diagnostics I'd be happy to comply. I compiled the kernel with debug info, but that's totally useless, since it won't dump anything, just hang there; I don't think even DDB would help, since even the keyboard is not working at that time. If I'm missing something, I'd be glad to be directed to any pointer. The box features an em NIC on board, but since it shows a lot of problems, I removed that driver from the kernel (it's not possible to turn it off in the BIOS, though) and put in a different add-on card. I had some shared IRQs, but managed to solve that issue (even if I think it should not matter). Next, I'll try to disable SMP as soon as I can and see if it helps. Of course upgrading to 6.2 should be attempted, but since this is a production server and 6.2 is still at RC1... bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 11:21:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F0616A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B639543D49 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:20:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so284348nzh for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:20:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.219.2 with SMTP id w2mr14344012qbq.1164280857260; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:20:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.110.19 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:20:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:20:57 +0200 From: "Vlad Galu" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Is GNATS down? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:21:03 -0000 I submitted a PR a few days ago and haven't heard anything related to the matter ever since. I was supposed to get a confirmation email once the PR had been filed. P.S. Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to this list. -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 11:48:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13A016A416 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8B543D5A for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:47:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.145] (helo=anti-virus03-08) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GnD3r-00061H-E7; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:48:11 +0000 Received: from [82.41.32.108] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GnD3q-0005AB-Hf; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:48:10 +0000 Message-ID: <45658A7A.7040909@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:48:10 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graham Bentley References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:48:13 -0000 Graham Bentley wrote: >> You've confused STABLE with RELEASE. 6.2 has not reached RELEASE. >> 6-STABLE is the latest "these changes worked fine in CURRENT (right >> now, aka 7) and have been MFCed (merged from current) so that more >> people can try them out", which right now corresponds to the version >> of FreeBSDthat is just about to be released which also happens to be >> called6.2-RC1 (release candidate 1)). When 6.2 is ready to go, a >> new RELEASE branch is created (6.2-RELEASE) which only gets security >> fixes. > > > So, if I want the 'latest version' that 'isnt a work in progress' (or > at least tested > to the point where it is know to be working correctly in the majority > of scenarios) > always use the RELEASE branches ? Correct. There are situations where you would *consider* -STABLE even in a production box, but they are rare. Some examples: 1) You have some brand new hardware which is only supported on -STABLE. I do my best to avoid this by rarely if ever following the bleeding edge of hardware development, but that's not always possible. 2) Some serious bug, which wasn't caught before, crops up with a piece of hardware, and the fix is only in -STABLE. Obviously, the nearer that -STABLE is to the next release version, the smaller the risk that you are taking. For example, I would have far fewer qualms about running 6.2-RC1 (or even any of its -BETA predecessors), than I would about switching to -STABLE mid-way between release cycles. At the point of a release cycle starting, -STABLE will have had as much testing as it's ever going to (except for the release cycle itself). If I did have to run -STABLE on some "production" machine, then I would be *very* conservative about how I upgraded it. I would only try upgrading to a newer -STABLE if there was an actual problem which I believed would be fixed; and I would fix all security issues using patches, as far as possible, not by cvsup-ing. And the second the next -RELEASE came along, I'd be on to it. Of course, if you have the time and less-critical machines then running -STABLE is a good thing as you would be contributing to the debugging effort. But you will have to be prepared to deal with things breaking now and again, so a familiarity with how to upgrade and downgrade (as well as the time) are very helpful. hth, --Alex PS I'm a very conservative upgrader; I still have 5.4 on all my "production" boxes and am just waiting for 6.2. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 12:06:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC43616A4D1 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E38243D4C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:05:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 16501 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2006 12:05:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (775067@[217.50.147.215]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Nov 2006 12:05:47 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:05:24 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: "Vlad Galu" Message-ID: <20061123130524.4c9922cc@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2008-08-18.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_V74xXAQ1ALaz9xo06cPdDY+; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is GNATS down? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:06:02 -0000 --Sig_V74xXAQ1ALaz9xo06cPdDY+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Vlad Galu" wrote: > I submitted a PR a few days ago and haven't heard anything related > to the matter ever since. I was supposed to get a confirmation email > once the PR had been filed. I'm also still waiting for the confirmation mail of a PR (update for www/privoxy) I filed three days ago trough the website.=20 For the first time I used the patch upload thingy and I read about some encoding problems a while ago, but I got the "Thank You" screen so I assume it should at least appear partly broken? Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_V74xXAQ1ALaz9xo06cPdDY+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZY6NBYqIVf93VJ0RAsS5AJ0Yrw57l3QH6wgKnrh3xzVBw1f8hACfS3t6 latQRN9nOrI70KKLfwhevfE= =QKZT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_V74xXAQ1ALaz9xo06cPdDY+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 12:13:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C45D16A508 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markoco@beotel.net) Received: from beotel.net (mailgate.beotel.net [194.106.162.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD3D43D72 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:12:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markoco@beotel.net) Received: from beotel.net (unverified [194.106.162.23]) by beotel.net (SurgeMail 3.7b6) with ESMTP id 91188915 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:13:32 +0100 Received: from 217.169.219.161 by HTTP Sender: markoco@beotel.net From: "markoco" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Quality Web Email v3.1r X-Originating-IP: 217.169.219.161 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:13:32 +0100 Message-id: <4565906c.271.6885.175810917@beotel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=353157669 X-Authenticated-User: markoco@beotel.net Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:13:41 -0000 After downloading and burning FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE ia64 CD-s from your ftp, I've try to install it and sysinstall don't boot. Please help me to solve this problem. Thanks Mac OS X 10.4.6 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 13:24:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BB616A412 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86A743D49 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:23:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:24:04 -0500 id 000564E8.4565A0F4.00008F69 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:24:03 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: VeeJay Message-Id: <20061123082403.b8afea32.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:24:06 -0000 On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:45:19 +0100 VeeJay wrote: > On 11/23/06, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > > > And how can one into the System by booting from a CD if it still > > > requires the Password even in Single User mode? > > > > Booting from CD, floppy or hard disk is slected at BIOS level. > > > > Booting in single or multi user mode is at Operating system level. > > > > Booting is in the following order: > > > > 1) BIOS select what medium to boot from > > > > 2) the operating system boot from the selected medium > > > > So when it comes to the Single user password, itis already at stage 2) > > it has passed the stage 1 (booting from hard disk ofr CD) without > > password. > > > > Olivier > > > > So, it means, that I should take the following steps > > 1. Password on BIOS > 2. Change the order of booting i.e. When system is installed and working > once, then I just the change the Booting FIRST from HardDisk. > 3. Put the password on Single User mode. > > So, what more? Do you people think that I have got somehow security barrier > for unauthorized access? Physically _LOCK_ the server up. Anyone who can get physical access to the unit can remove the drive and access it from another machine, bypassing all this stuff. Another option is to encrypt the hard drives, but this will require you (or someone else) to enter the password for the encrypted drives every time the system boots up, so it's generally a maintenance nightmare. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 13:25:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A265016A416 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EC343D6D for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:25:21 -0500 id 000564EE.4565A141.00008F87 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:25:20 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: VeeJay Message-Id: <20061123082520.af5d4265.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:25:24 -0000 On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:56:23 +0100 VeeJay wrote: > So, does it mean that Windows 2003 Server provides more Password Level > Security with Unauthorized Access? Where is this presumption coming from? Windows OS suffer from the same difficulty protecting from physical intrusion that any other OS does. > And how can one into the System by booting from a CD if it still requires > the Password even in Single User mode? > > > > On 11/22/06, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:41:37AM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly > > appreciated. > > > > > > I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? > > > > > > I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in > > single > > > user mode and steal the data? > > > How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in single user mode, it > > > still demands the password and without password one cannot do anything? > > > or make it possible that booting in Single user mode, doesn't provide > > any > > > shell? > > > > Lock it in a box. Anyone who can put their hands physically can > > get in to the machine with a little tinkering even if you disable > > lots of software. > > > > I think you can get rid of the single user option in the boot, > > but anyone with a CD can defeat that if they want to. It would > > make things harder for yourself in managing the system, but it > > would slow a person down from casual interference. > > > > Also, many machines have BIOS level boot passwords that can be turned > > on. Using that would slow a person down, but be annoying for youself, > > especially in times such as power failures - the system would not come > > back up automatically without someone entering the BIOS password. > > > > Plus, if a person is determined enough, they can defeat that as well > > by removing the battery backup for the MB or the flash memory. But, > > it would stop casual tinkering. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 06:06:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E629616A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: from web57802.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57802.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BA8D43D45 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:06:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rachel_florentine@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 77255 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Nov 2006 06:06:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cWq0yvtsiWJ4NcbAAwv7YbfrlFTW2wFpUTv7asaFgXMAIP0ZcPJgiguFyy+yVDzSmB3h78I0DORP/1KcR6OHDGSe1f1dLzUB4rr0jFFaEwdnthf9drAK1RAEvGbxeGUWbaOGcBvPBocukw3dSbPGea47AP2y7g5Fx7mtDiCIFG8= ; Message-ID: <20061123060648.77253.qmail@web57802.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.19.14.34] by web57802.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:06:48 PST Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:06:48 -0800 (PST) From: Rachel Florentine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:31:06 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Getting Qmail & Ezmlm To Work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:06:50 -0000 757575Hi;=0AI installed qmail from source because of problems with the port= . I installed vpopmail from port okay. I installed ezmlm-idx from port; how= ever, it doesn't appear to communicate with one or both of the other two pr= ograms. I can issue commands from the command prompt to create a list, add = members, etc...all that works fine. But if I try to subscribe by email, not= hing happens. That's why I think there's a communication problem between pr= ograms. Perhaps what I need to do is compile ezmlm from port and specify th= e location/installation for qmail and/or vpopmail? Please advise. Also, if = you would be so kind (since I had major problems with this with the openlda= p port), if you can please provide the command to build ezmlm-idx.=0ATIA,= =0ARachel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A_______________________________________________= _____________________________________=0ACheap talk?=0ACheck out Yahoo! Mess= enger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.=0Ahttp://voice.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 14:34:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCE816A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F3B43D5A for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:34:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so309667pyh for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:34:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=lYh/cM2rsGvSDa7fsz/6bGtyuXYHKfuAWFeBlsAB70crlbWErjUM7OUPqvytRITyNFhGOM7fFsreElXuGv8/ugbPyBhpvrdPhgYiMIylTVCLLPfrT2NsbUekedWr9XuGs876DAkFVnBwrAMiPqnTgxyf4eUlq9SgyZBaUad7ksA= Received: by 10.35.134.19 with SMTP id l19mr3514916pyn.1164292477392; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:34:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:34:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611230634j6bcff387r14d1d8912e3a208c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:34:37 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Help... Installing from Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:34:38 -0000 Hi If I will install Apache2 from the Port, how can I configure to add module or disable modules? Like if I want to enable following modules, how can I do them VIA Ports? Please find below the text from this Step-by-Step guide I am using. But that procedure is for manually downloading the archive, checking signatures and then configuring.... But how can I use Port system to get the same results? ----------------- Compiling and installing the software In this step we will configure, compile, and install the Apache web server as follows: ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/local/apache2 \ --with-mpm=prefork \ --disable-charset-lite \ --disable-include \ --disable-env \ --disable-setenvif \ --disable-status \ --disable-autoindex \ --disable-asis \ --disable-cgi \ --disable-negotiation \ --disable-imap \ --disable-actions \ --disable-userdir \ --disable-alias \ --disable-so make su umask 022 make install chown -R root:sys /usr/local/apache2 ----------------- If we can configure in Port, so where it could be done and how? and if its in a file, where it would be placed? -- -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 14:39:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8AF16A416 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@wholemeal.net) Received: from mail9.messagelabs.com (mail9.messagelabs.com [194.205.110.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B825143D4C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:38:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@wholemeal.net) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: greg@wholemeal.net X-Msg-Ref: server-20.tower-9.messagelabs.com!1164292765!25167971!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [212.135.210.82] Received: (qmail 6103 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2006 14:39:25 -0000 Received: from dsl-212-135-210-82.dsl.easynet.co.uk (HELO warprecords.com) (212.135.210.82) by server-20.tower-9.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 2006 14:39:25 -0000 Received: from [192.168.100.39] (HELO [192.168.0.10]) by warprecords.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.10) with ESMTPS id 6988297 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:39:24 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <377AB060-5521-4F50-A7B3-6A47968EC773@wholemeal.net> References: <377AB060-5521-4F50-A7B3-6A47968EC773@wholemeal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5232AF14-E56E-48DA-8B74-EED28E7F2326@wholemeal.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Greg Eden Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:39:27 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: Rescuing mangled RAID5 array X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:39:27 -0000 Hello again, On 14 Nov 2006, at 18:30, Greg Eden wrote: > I'm trying to recover data from a broken RAID5 array (drive removed > whilst array was rebuilding!). > > [snip] > I'm trying > > dd if=/dev/da1s1d of=/raid2/rescueimage I'm trying not to equate lack of response to lack of chance of receovery! However... After 4 days dd eventually successfully created a 1.5TB image file of the trashed partition, so i can work on it without causing further damage. I successfully attached it with mdconfig. Running fsck_ufs on the resultant /dev/md0 causes fsck_ufs to eventually crash out with: UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=42151497 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CLEAR? yes fsck_ufs: bad inode number 42158080 to nextinode during Phase 1. Is there anyway to get around this so fsck can continue? Thanks in advance. Greg. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 15:20:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEF816A417 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from nxm.secservers.com (nxm.secservers.com [193.85.228.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F21943D7B for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:20:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nxm.secservers.com. [193.85.228.22]) by nxm.secservers.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kANFKBrs041250; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:20:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) From: Michal Mertl To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:20:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1164295204.1755.31.camel@genius.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Olivier Nicole , jerrymc@msu.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:20:38 -0000 VeeJay wrote: > On 11/23/06, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > > > And how can one into the System by booting from a CD if it still > > > requires the Password even in Single User mode? > > > > Booting from CD, floppy or hard disk is slected at BIOS level. > > > > Booting in single or multi user mode is at Operating system level. > > > > Booting is in the following order: > > > > 1) BIOS select what medium to boot from > > > > 2) the operating system boot from the selected medium > > > > So when it comes to the Single user password, itis already at stage 2) > > it has passed the stage 1 (booting from hard disk ofr CD) without > > password. > > > > Olivier > > > > So, it means, that I should take the following steps > > 1. Password on BIOS > 2. Change the order of booting i.e. When system is installed and working > once, then I just the change the Booting FIRST from HardDisk. > 3. Put the password on Single User mode. > > So, what more? Do you people think that I have got somehow security barrier > for unauthorized access? Not much. Default FreeBSD install has two more places where one can influence booting with console access - boot blocks and loader. To disable the access to OK prompt of boot blocks create file /boot.config with '-n'. To disable access to loader put autoboot_delay="-1" and beastie_disable=YES into /boot/loader.conf. You can also instead put password=... into it and the loader will then require password to allow access to it. Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 15:22:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B65D16A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:22:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F6A43D9A for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:21:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from localhost (marvin-mail [192.168.0.2]) by marvin.harmless.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125447BFCD1 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:22:10 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) (Debian) at harmless.hu Received: from marvin.harmless.hu ([192.168.0.2]) by localhost (marvin.harmless.hu [192.168.0.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPf1+TwM5ZlH for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:22:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marvin.harmless.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DD37BFCD0 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:22:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:22:03 +0100 From: Gergely CZUCZY To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061123152203.GA28656@harmless.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=x-unknown; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Subject: syslog not forwarding ftp.info to loghost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:22:45 -0000 --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hello i have a configuration with a few jails. all jail's syslog is logging into the host system's syslog via 127.0.0.2:514/udp. however the FTP's syslog is not sending the ftp.info messages to theo host system, but all the other messags(auth/authpriv) are sent correctly. this is the jail's syslog.conf: --- chop here --- # $FreeBSD: src/etc/syslog.conf,v 1.28 2005/03/12 12:31:16 glebius Exp $ # # Spaces ARE valid field separators in this file. However, # other *nix-like systems still insist on using tabs as field # separators. If you are sharing this file between systems, you # may want to use only tabs as field separators here. # Consult the syslog.conf(5) manpage. *.* @127.0.0.2 *.err;kern.warning;auth.notice;mail.crit /dev/console *.notice;authpriv.none;kern.debug;lpr.info;mail.crit;news.err /var/log/mess= ages security.* /var/log/security auth.info;authpriv.info /var/log/auth.log mail.info /var/log/maillog lpr.info /var/log/lpd-errs ftp.info /var/log/xferlog cron.* /var/log/cron *.=3Ddebug /var/log/debug.log *.emerg * # uncomment this to log all writes to /dev/console to /var/log/console.log #console.info /var/log/console.log # uncomment this to enable logging of all log messages to /var/log/all.log # touch /var/log/all.log and chmod it to mode 600 before it will work ftp.info @127.0.0.2 # uncomment this to enable logging to a remote loghost named loghost #*.* @loghost # uncomment these if you're running inn # news.crit /var/log/news/news.crit # news.err /var/log/news/news.err # news.notice /var/log/news/news.notice !startslip *.* /var/log/slip.log !ppp *.* /var/log/ppp.log --- chop here --- i have played with putting the *.* @ elsewhere, but it didn't help, also tried to specifically forward ftp.info to loghost, that neither helped, even tried to remove xferlog from here, because of the duplicate ftp.info speficiation, nor that helped. what am i doing wrong here? how could i make this work? i'd like to also have the xferlog in my host system. i'm using 6.1-RELEASE-p10 Bye, Gergely Czuczy mailto: gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu --=20 Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise. --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) owGNVluLHEUUXhMUp8CH/IMTNrDJZrp7Zja7SWZZsrlMosEHSQKCglDTfXqmTHdV p6p6ejvvgg8KQR8jEvBNEQQDPqgg6KP64E9Q/BvBU9XTc3EXcXbZ3ar66pxT37l8 ++S10xunzvz+zfN3L370ydOXvu78OL6Yl9bKSZBzPRMy6Pd6/WBwZW93L9gJLl29 2r+82xvsDXrjwaWr6Qh/eHpTSYvSBg/qAodg8chGRcaF3Id4yrVBe1DaNLjCWtwt YQplhBVKDkHITEhcnD3QXJoUdTCSsUqEnAzhUaksJkGhhbR8nCFjU8wyxZiAKZ8h cIiVTMWk1NyZhErYKW2mWMH7XGQmBJ5l/s8tA6Y2mZowYYB+Tcg+BWAV2CnCVBnr zi3mCyDMBIf+4HLYo6/BcLd/KSqTImRTVeEMtb93+8FbSzwZlorMoHTB+/PUFqGQ qYIcjeETNKxxqFY9dmFcWh+ou6Loh57jzXle2mnkfhAFswvANTKyb+nZWmNsszpk zE7JM32722tPDR05QxYEAWVDFUCGEWjFNuHcbY144/6tIRgdR2jjaOVKdwb9cHAF Br3ebtTbifoD4mG40x/292CS4ViUBkZHBZxjm2yzc7/gMRq4fm8EM56JBFKBWUI0 FJyyojTFJsHHmIoMQ3i94a9LV5u3bktxFGTiIc75oPCtIDaENIJIorSWxhPKxwa4 aezT7aWHEN5IoVal4wcMFV7D/9wljNFWiLI133VQup/zGipOZFJOSkPMy6xed7L6 CEdeSLeoWk2ZWc/2Cmfndy9AzmVBSQ7Zdrjd8Z/DRf3QHmq9/xC1DCuuJUW47/Ia UsmIGPdzSlwYa2E7nSjBWUQ2jaKC324BbRHQWmJjJ8FxOdnPCu1rbGliX2JlnLtO NOM6ohAjV08HzFegwbgkUN3G6D8LYHvKfHDe7sKzW3U6J93yYNdcPoZjuA7QZxkL YRy2Dfw4dA2eFUlAbzGsbabOf9g+ovnhbMdaybUHrtle4h2OOD7YueXJPPHCAuwh /pmUzBz1MfjSAWxTk5U0x/LctauvRSozNyZco1dEMfqd1WT79SKyZs+722wX8+ev vWAVd4JLlG5wLkaeSn0ALpB2Jq25pcO5KavKeHrsALhMaJrkKgHhO4f+Qtjr9ajL UkXtR7uV695K6YdrKYOVZvgfgdIOB405CYDb8/NS8hyTdsU2523WEH642F6zjdTY wg+HLQpOl1I2g18SzrdJ03PrVeQOosVpi3QN9a+6XwLpsMU1DXtSmyzhDYadNZZr azJRLGfGshVp2+fibFGcdE67/vj4fG/lkaS4JsK8KhYk7K0skS04BMwMVu5OI0CU uEQkcsuSnazoMp4Z0iotyADlwhQYi1TEVAY1UKJphiVLeWtK29HfJQecMoXCzXYn 1wUmXaCJL5fGXFopvHmzQqpVDvNAMOZ+Fqc+0KQsMvJpcVFJLhAKQ3i975Lg6sZh 44jUsHIrnoOARLn3VtThE2/9GoluRcpZ0mAXNKxJcHztuUq9xsQWVZYTIVd47ume QRdEGybJWF6vCjd5E1v5XJ32wn5wb/Tm6Pr9UVD0e4zdqLHL2B0aE0iU3Xxcxo9r Px+tGsKk2Q5jv31IkpVn1I7htGSUz4NBj71NiiVcc6KxIdyhBfFC0qgyl1itqFdy 07yd9M6Q6nx47fTLG+6fsvY/ujOnbrzYePbVO1/e+230/WfP7u78/N4j/OVJ/Vxs fL71l7j76d8vHv3x6p/f/vTrB6989/EXk38A =MZgL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 15:40:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B4116A47E for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FBA43D7B for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:40:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kANFd9de056477; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:39:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kANFd90Y056476; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:39:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:39:09 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: VeeJay Message-ID: <20061123153909.GA56451@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:40:57 -0000 On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:56:23AM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > So, does it mean that Windows 2003 Server provides more Password Level > Security with Unauthorized Access? > > And how can one into the System by booting from a CD if it still requires > the Password even in Single User mode? You just go to fixit mode - where you are running from the CD and not the installed OS and then rewrite any file that limits your access and then reboot again. ////jerry > > > > On 11/22/06, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > >On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:41:37AM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly > >appreciated. > >> > >> I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? > >> > >> I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in > >single > >> user mode and steal the data? > >> How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in single user mode, it > >> still demands the password and without password one cannot do anything? > >> or make it possible that booting in Single user mode, doesn't provide > >any > >> shell? > > > >Lock it in a box. Anyone who can put their hands physically can > >get in to the machine with a little tinkering even if you disable > >lots of software. > > > >I think you can get rid of the single user option in the boot, > >but anyone with a CD can defeat that if they want to. It would > >make things harder for yourself in managing the system, but it > >would slow a person down from casual interference. > > > >Also, many machines have BIOS level boot passwords that can be turned > >on. Using that would slow a person down, but be annoying for youself, > >especially in times such as power failures - the system would not come > >back up automatically without someone entering the BIOS password. > > > >Plus, if a person is determined enough, they can defeat that as well > >by removing the battery backup for the MB or the flash memory. But, > >it would stop casual tinkering. > > > >////jerry > > > >> > >> Thanks in advance > >> > >> -- > >> > >> BR / vj > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > -- > Thanks! > > BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 15:43:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6B616A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:43:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D053943D49 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:42:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kANFfNHW056496; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:41:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kANFfNv9056495; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:41:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:41:23 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: VeeJay Message-ID: <20061123154123.GB56451@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Olivier Nicole , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:43:32 -0000 On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 10:45:19AM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > On 11/23/06, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > >> And how can one into the System by booting from a CD if it still > >> requires the Password even in Single User mode? > > > >Booting from CD, floppy or hard disk is slected at BIOS level. > > > >Booting in single or multi user mode is at Operating system level. > > > >Booting is in the following order: > > > >1) BIOS select what medium to boot from > > > >2) the operating system boot from the selected medium > > > >So when it comes to the Single user password, itis already at stage 2) > >it has passed the stage 1 (booting from hard disk ofr CD) without > >password. > > > >Olivier > > > > So, it means, that I should take the following steps > > 1. Password on BIOS > 2. Change the order of booting i.e. When system is installed and working > once, then I just the change the Booting FIRST from HardDisk. > 3. Put the password on Single User mode. As I said, you can beat that by removing the system battery or flash memory. > > So, what more? Do you people think that I have got somehow security barrier > for unauthorized access? The only real security is to totally prevent access. If that machine is in a place where you do not trust those who can touch it, then it is insecure. ////jerry > > > > -- > Thanks! > > BR / vj > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 15:46:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A97F16A416 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:46:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3822443D6E for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:45:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kANFk1K0025729 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:46:01 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:46:00 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611230946.00996.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on zeus.dfwlp.com Subject: sources version file? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:46:08 -0000 ive searched the archives over the past 2 weeks or so unsuccessfully for this tidbit, which i have seen mentioned here before. so, i re-ask: what is the path/filename of the sources file that says what version of the cvs sources have been downloaded? thanks, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 15:55:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ECE16A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811BC43D55 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:55:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id kANFsbRf015756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:54:39 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kANFsT8v037772; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:54:31 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kANFsSQb037771; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:54:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:54:27 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Jonathan Horne Message-ID: <20061123155427.GA37732@kobe.laptop> References: <200611230946.00996.freebsd@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611230946.00996.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.432, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.77, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sources version file? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:55:39 -0000 On 2006-11-23 09:46, Jonathan Horne wrote: > ive searched the archives over the past 2 weeks or so unsuccessfully for this > tidbit, which i have seen mentioned here before. so, i re-ask: > > what is the path/filename of the sources file that says what version of the > cvs sources have been downloaded? In CVS each file has its owwn "revision number". Thus, there is no "tree-wide version number". In general, you can refer to the date of the last commit you have updated to. This is not so easy or useful for "mixed version" trees, where you have all the commits up to, for instance, date A but have manually applied the patch B to the tree (from another date, B). Why do you want to find out this "tree-wise" revision? Perhaps there is some other way to obtain the information you are after... - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 15:57:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1416A16A494 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:57:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from GregoryC@stcinc.com) Received: from internet.simplifiedtechnology.com (internet.simplifiedtechnology.com [66.166.74.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2A843D5E for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:56:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from GregoryC@stcinc.com) Received: from bastion.simplifiedtechnology.com ([10.2.2.2]) by internet.simplifiedtechnology.com (8.13.6HeaderPatch20060523/8.10.2) with ESMTP id kANFuuJ98881; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:57:00 -0800 (PST) From: Gregory Carvalho Organization: Simplified Technology Company To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:57:10 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611230757.11410.GregoryC@stcinc.com> Cc: VeeJay Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:57:07 -0000 You might consider a safe with A/C from Black Box. Expensive, but an option for you. On Tuesday 21 November 2006 19:41, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated. > > I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? > > I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single > user mode and steal the data? > How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in single user mode, it > still demands the password and without password one cannot do anything? > or make it possible that booting in Single user mode, doesn't provide any > shell? > > Thanks in advance > > -- > > BR / vj > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 16:17:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3E216A4AB for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from probsdorg@yahoo.com) Received: from web52415.mail.yahoo.com (web52415.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 961CA43DC4 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:15:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from probsdorg@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 78645 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Nov 2006 16:16:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=axQGiokwU386YFQk5GlNknyHpDcxkkca1vcLPM5MfRLWvYWkCqU37wXtreSKBf4Wk7iHS96AzvGW7GSXcJh+S+ifElpMm1sqA8YmS7bnWrq/kynaEYsQr1OE3qXqS1lqsMjCcNmWOWvqRGhHPDjKekmXXsZmndt/uTeF+6aoDv4=; X-YMail-OSG: AHftsd0VM1kxv6DM7rpxne3fcYlncS4oCzBj8NLhNr8ofn6k1VQ_33mP3L3JLepBBFlXeRU0TeAMzeAQiqGqQo3IdbiMwg2vtNhyhoxrWB_p1rXOATzCIbMX2FIf7XbnmrKMWdz.kYnFU5o- Received: from [68.225.82.218] by web52415.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:16:17 PST Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:16:17 -0800 (PST) From: probsd org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <15506.78504.qm@web52415.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Java JRE (latest) | Mozilla 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:17:12 -0000 Hey group. I'm using the latest Firefox2 (non-linux) and have the latest diablo-jre15 port installed. I'm finding that the plugin for firefox causes firefox to freeze consistently. For example, when accessing myspace, as soon as I click on Myspace's mail link firefox will freeze immediately everytime. When I turn javascript off in firefox then all works fine (except to send mail in myspace you have to have javascript enabled). I tried the FreeBSDfoundations JRE package but it said it required a past version javawrapper. Is there a more stable version of JRE in ports thats more stable? Michael --------------------------------- Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 16:38:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EB916A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@superhero.nl) Received: from superman.superhero.nl (superhero.nl [213.84.142.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C233A43D45 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:37:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@superhero.nl) Received: (qmail 16396 invoked by uid 80); 23 Nov 2006 16:38:03 -0000 Received: from a80-127-127-95.adsl.xs4all.nl ([80.127.127.95]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user gelsemap) by webmail.superhero.nl with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:38:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1075.80.127.127.95.1164299883.squirrel@webmail.superhero.nl> In-Reply-To: <200611230946.00996.freebsd@dfwlp.com> References: <200611230946.00996.freebsd@dfwlp.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:38:03 +0100 (CET) From: "Gelsema, P \(Patrick\) - FreeBSD" To: "Jonathan Horne" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sources version file? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:38:08 -0000 On Thu, November 23, 2006 16:46, Jonathan Horne wrote: > ive searched the archives over the past 2 weeks or so unsuccessfully for > this > tidbit, which i have seen mentioned here before. so, i re-ask: > > what is the path/filename of the sources file that says what version of > the > cvs sources have been downloaded? # egrep "REVISION|BRANCH" /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh REVISION="5.4" BRANCH="RELEASE-p22" RELEASE="${REVISION}-${BRANCH}" Cheers Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 16:43:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA83E16A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345DA43D53 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:43:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.140] (helo=anti-virus02-07) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GnHft-0003cJ-U1; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:43:45 +0000 Received: from [82.41.32.108] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GnHfs-0008G5-VF; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:43:45 +0000 Message-ID: <4565CFC0.4030704@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:43:44 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne References: <200611230946.00996.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <20061123155427.GA37732@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20061123155427.GA37732@kobe.laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sources version file? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:43:49 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2006-11-23 09:46, Jonathan Horne wrote: > > >>ive searched the archives over the past 2 weeks or so unsuccessfully for this >>tidbit, which i have seen mentioned here before. so, i re-ask: >> >>what is the path/filename of the sources file that says what version of the >>cvs sources have been downloaded? >> >> > > > Do you mean "After I have cvsup'ed /usr/src, how can I tell what version of FreeBSD is there?" If so, the answer is "I don't know, but I'm sure someone will", but that question makes sense, whereas your current one doesn't really, as Giorgos has explained. hth, --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 16:49:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A7016A412 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C211C43D45 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:49:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.139] (helo=anti-virus01-10) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GnHlp-0000jc-IU; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:49:53 +0000 Received: from [82.41.32.108] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GnHlo-0008TK-LF; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:49:52 +0000 Message-ID: <4565D130.3050607@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:49:52 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: probsd org References: <15506.78504.qm@web52415.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <15506.78504.qm@web52415.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Java JRE (latest) | Mozilla 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:49:55 -0000 probsd org wrote: >Hey group. I'm using the latest Firefox2 (non-linux) and have the latest diablo-jre15 port installed. I'm finding that the plugin for firefox causes firefox to freeze consistently. For example, when accessing myspace, as soon as I click on Myspace's mail link firefox will freeze immediately everytime. When I turn javascript off in firefox then all works fine (except to send mail in myspace you have to have javascript enabled). > >I tried the FreeBSDfoundations JRE package but it said it required a past version javawrapper. > java and javascript are completely unrelated(*) so updating Java is unlikely to fix a problem if it's source is, as you think, javascript. --Alex (*) It is quite possible for java and javascript to interact, and this has been an area of great inconsistency and numerous timing bugs in many, many browsers over the years, but nothing you've said points to java being used at all. Firefox2 lets you disable java (as opposed to javascript) so you could try that and see if that helps, but it seems like a shot in the dark with too little info to me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 17:04:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03BB16A40F for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5950343D55 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:03:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kANH4SrD026378 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:04:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:04:27 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200611230946.00996.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <1075.80.127.127.95.1164299883.squirrel@webmail.superhero.nl> In-Reply-To: <1075.80.127.127.95.1164299883.squirrel@webmail.superhero.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611231104.27844.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on zeus.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: sources version file? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:04:36 -0000 On Thursday 23 November 2006 10:38, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: > /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh ah yes, thats the one i was looking for!! thanks! cheers, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 17:36:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD18C16A594 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:36:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-237-189.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.237.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C74943D53 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:35:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kANHaWCt016263 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:36:32 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kANHaWHj016260 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:36:32 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id RAA19097; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:35:08 GMT Message-Id: <200611231735.RAA19097@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:52:15 EST." <20061123075214.GA51991@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:35:08 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:36:36 -0000 > > > > hw.ata.wc=3D3D0 > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > "Make my hard drive go reeeeally slow please (just in case I crash)" :) > >=20 > > Slower, yes, but not *that* slow. > >=20 > > Normal ls : 0.032 second. Two processes using same disk, multiply by two, > > so 0.064 second. Maybe the multiplier is more than 2, call it 10x, so > > 0.32 second. But I'm seeing a factor of over 9100x. > > Humour me and turn it back on, then see what happens. Where is the knob to turn the write cache on/off on a per-drive basis in FreeBSD? I can do this in NetBSD, but the only knob I can find in FreeBSD affects all drives, and requires a reboot. Humour me and read the Subject line. The ls does not get its fair share of disk I/O. Both times are with the disk's write cache in write-through mode. I'm not comparing times with the write cache in different modes. I'm comparing ls by itself against ls competing with cp. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 18:14:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF88A16A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:14:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB42343D53 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:13:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dundeemt@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so908377nfc for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:14:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Dqmbu3dnrjVfq59UGBmJxwerCtngTlzp+hiqRUbdnrhLy08JEuS+8VbNHPyN5NlxhxPwg0q8Qp0THc7sDtrGoL8wZYxslkinlzUitM+VWIlcVY5MUfxKeTVWosve5LJqRGF9nSv1v4yohvKMwJ4CHwKU4bthabXi901yIiXVjck= Received: by 10.82.153.5 with SMTP id a5mr1462705bue.1164305659805; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:14:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.18 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:14:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5aaed53f0611231014p7334e798r53eb8f54200867e1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:14:19 -0600 From: "Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T" Sender: dundeemt@gmail.com To: "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" In-Reply-To: <456524C6.4080304@rithy4u.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4564F222.5020209@rithy4u.net> <5aaed53f0611221928v7fcf349cub5d094496fcb770e@mail.gmail.com> <456524C6.4080304@rithy4u.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2f6bfae72cc3b801 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:14:22 -0000 On 11/22/06, Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET wrote: > Thanks, could you introduce a cost effective SATA model for me one? > > Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T wrote: > > On 11/22/06, Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET wrote: > >> Does FreeBSD support newer SATA RAID Controller? What software to make > >> RAID 1? or someone know which SATA RAID Controller can support hardware > >> mirror? > >> > >> -- > >> *Rithy Ray, RCSA* > >> Chief Executive Officer > >> Web: www.rithy4u.net > >> Email: info@rithy4u.net > >> Phone: (855) 12 403 001 > >> > >> -- > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and > >> dangerous content by rithy4uSpamAppliance, and is > >> believed to be clean. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > Newer RAID controllers -- Yes, see the h/w compat listing on the > > freebsd site > > > > Software RAID 1 - easy, gmirror. see > > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html for > > more > > > > Pretty much any controller that supports FreeBSD supports mirroring. > > > > -- > *Rithy Ray, RCSA* > Chief Executive Officer > Web: www.rithy4u.net > Email: info@rithy4u.net > Phone: (855) 12 403 001 > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by rithy4uSpamAppliance, and is > believed to be clean. > > That really depends on the application and your server hardware. I've used Highpoint cards with success. Others are quite pleased with 3ware products and there are others. I would suggest you research some possibilities and then query the group for feedback on the particular models you are condidering. -- Jeff Hinrichs Dundee Media & Technology, Inc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 18:37:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726C616A47C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-237-189.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.237.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3723D43D82 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:36:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kANIbIBs016736 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:37:18 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kANIbItw016733 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:37:18 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id SAA09802; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:35:58 GMT Message-Id: <200611231835.SAA09802@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:52:15 EST." <20061123075214.GA51991@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:35:58 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:37:27 -0000 Here's another oddity: With one process reading from ad4, crunching data, writing to ad2: 4 users Load 0.31 0.47 0.67 Nov 23 10:05 Mem:KB REAL VIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share Tot Share Free in out in out Act 52356 3364 82872 6952 104604 count All 2010324 4120 1344905k 8148 pages 1 8450 zfod Interrupts Proc:r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt 21 cow 1251 total 1 1 40 706 8736 472 1528 34 8489 188356 wire 1000 0: clk 53816 act 1: atkb 5.9%Sys 0.0%Intr 0.0%User 92.0%Nice 2.0%Idl 1669272 inact 41 3: sio1 | | | | | | | | | | 100624 cache 4: sio0 ===--------------------------------------------- 3980 free 7: ppc0 daefr stray 7 Namei Name-cache Dir-cache 29 prcfr 128 8: rtc Calls hits % hits % 2 react 19 10: ohc 153 151 99 pdwak 3 11: fwo 2602 pdpgs 14: ata Disks ad2 ad4 ad6 ad8 ad10 cd0 pass0 intrn 60 15: ata KB/t 128 63.27 0.00 16.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 218624 buf tps 30 19 0 3 0 0 0 11 dirtybuf MB/s 3.77 1.15 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 100000 desiredvnodes % busy 49 3 0 2 0 0 0 995 numvnodes 621 freevnodes Same as above, but add a cp from ad10 to ad6: 4 users Load 0.63 0.53 0.68 Nov 23 10:05 Mem:KB REAL VIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share Tot Share Free in out in out Act 52108 3364 82624 6952 106240 count All 2010268 4120 1345038k 8148 pages 3783 zfod Interrupts Proc:r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt cow 1412 total 1 1 1 40 1432 3981 412 1896 102 3783 193108 wire 1000 0: clk 53580 act 1: atkb 6.6%Sys 0.8%Intr 0.0%User 40.0%Nice 52.7%Idl 1663056 inact 40 3: sio1 | | | | | | | | | | 102268 cache 4: sio0 ===+-------------------- 3972 free 7: ppc0 daefr stray 7 Namei Name-cache Dir-cache prcfr 128 8: rtc Calls hits % hits % 3 react 112 10: ohc pdwak 105 11: fwo 5229 pdpgs 14: ata Disks ad2 ad4 ad6 ad8 ad10 cd0 pass0 intrn 27 15: ata KB/t 126 60.34 128 0.00 128 0.00 0.00 217024 buf tps 14 7 53 0 53 0 0 13 dirtybuf MB/s 1.70 0.41 6.57 0.00 6.57 0.00 0.00 100000 desiredvnodes % busy 22 2 100 0 6 0 0 995 numvnodes 621 freevnodes Suspend the data crunching process, and just the cp gives this: 4 users Load 0.52 0.51 0.67 Nov 23 10:05 Mem:KB REAL VIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share Tot Share Free in out in out Act 52172 3364 82688 6952 102596 count All 2010884 4120 1345232k 8148 pages zfod Interrupts Proc:r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt cow 1347 total 1 1 41 1273 239 1712 93 223736 wire 1000 0: clk 53644 act 1: atkb 3.0%Sys 0.6%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 96.4%Idl 1635616 inact 7 3: sio1 | | | | | | | | | | 99632 cache 4: sio0 =+ 2964 free 7: ppc0 daefr stray 7 Namei Name-cache Dir-cache prcfr 128 8: rtc Calls hits % hits % react 105 10: ohc pdwak 106 11: fwo 5241 pdpgs 14: ata Disks ad2 ad4 ad6 ad8 ad10 cd0 pass0 intrn 1 15: ata KB/t 54.40 0.00 128 0.00 128 0.00 0.00 209184 buf tps 1 0 53 0 53 0 0 5 dirtybuf MB/s 0.05 0.00 6.60 0.00 6.62 0.00 0.00 100000 desiredvnodes % busy 1 0 100 0 6 0 0 995 numvnodes 621 freevnodes With only one process active, I get what I expect. The cp is I/O bound, the cruncher is CPU bound. But with both processes running I get something odd. The cp still gets the same amount of disk I/O, but the cruncher slows way down and the CPU is ~53% idle? The cp is not accessing anything on ad2 or ad4. The cruncher program is not accessing anything on ad6 or ad10. The /, /usr, /var, and such filesystems are on ad8. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 18:43:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B49A16A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E131A43D49 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:42:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2006 18:43:24 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (EHLO [192.168.5.5]) [62.59.173.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 23 Nov 2006 19:43:24 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25365336 Message-ID: <4565EBCF.8080008@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:43:27 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0611230634j6bcff387r14d1d8912e3a208c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611230634j6bcff387r14d1d8912e3a208c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help... Installing from Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:43:26 -0000 VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > If I will install Apache2 from the Port, how can I configure to add > module > or disable modules? > Like if I want to enable following modules, how can I do them VIA Ports? > Please find below the text from this Step-by-Step guide I am using. > But that > procedure is for manually downloading the archive, checking signatures > and > then configuring.... > > But how can I use Port system to get the same results? > > make install > > chown -R root:sys /usr/local/apache2 > > > ----------------- > > If we can configure in Port, so where it could be done and how? and if > its > in a file, where it would be placed? > go to the apache2 dir in your portstree ( generally /usr/ports/www/apache2/ ) run 'make config' to set options, if the specific options aren't there: copy the Makefile to Makefile.orig and add the '--enable-OPTION' and '--disable-OPTION' with the other compile options. Not sure though: but aren't a lot of those options also settable in the apache config file ? it might be a better idea to check that out first, so if you ever change your mind about a setting you don't have to recompile your intire apache2 port. -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 18:53:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A77416A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aarredon@cs.nmsu.edu) Received: from mail.cs.nmsu.edu (mail.cs.nmsu.edu [128.123.64.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EDC43D49 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:53:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aarredon@cs.nmsu.edu) Received: from intranet.cs.nmsu.edu (intranet [128.123.64.22]) by mail.cs.nmsu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kANIrvkm023212; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:53:57 -0700 (MST) Received: from intranet.cs.nmsu.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by intranet.cs.nmsu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id kANIrvHo009255; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:53:57 -0700 (MST) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by intranet.cs.nmsu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id kANIrvi9009254; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:53:57 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: intranet.cs.nmsu.edu: nobody set sender to aarredon@cs.nmsu.edu using -f Received: from 71.210.233.122 (SquirrelMail authenticated user aarredon) by intranet.cs.nmsu.edu with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:53:57 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <59555.71.210.233.122.1164308037.squirrel@intranet.cs.nmsu.edu> In-Reply-To: <5aaed53f0611231014p7334e798r53eb8f54200867e1@mail.gmail.com> References: <4564F222.5020209@rithy4u.net> <5aaed53f0611221928v7fcf349cub5d094496fcb770e@mail.gmail.com> <456524C6.4080304@rithy4u.net> <5aaed53f0611231014p7334e798r53eb8f54200867e1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:53:57 -0700 (MST) From: "Antonio Arredondo" To: "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:53:59 -0000 > On 11/22/06, Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET wrote: >> Thanks, could you introduce a cost effective SATA model for me one? >> >> Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T wrote: >> > On 11/22/06, Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET wrote: >> >> Does FreeBSD support newer SATA RAID Controller? What software to >> make >> >> RAID 1? or someone know which SATA RAID Controller can support >> hardware >> >> mirror? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> *Rithy Ray, RCSA* >> >> Chief Executive Officer >> >> Web: www.rithy4u.net >> >> Email: info@rithy4u.net >> >> Phone: (855) 12 403 001 >> >> >> >> -- >> >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >> dangerous content by rithy4uSpamAppliance, and is >> >> believed to be clean. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > Newer RAID controllers -- Yes, see the h/w compat listing on the >> > freebsd site >> > >> > Software RAID 1 - easy, gmirror. see >> > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html for >> > more >> > >> > Pretty much any controller that supports FreeBSD supports mirroring. >> > >> >> -- >> *Rithy Ray, RCSA* >> Chief Executive Officer >> Web: www.rithy4u.net >> Email: info@rithy4u.net >> Phone: (855) 12 403 001 >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by rithy4uSpamAppliance, and is >> believed to be clean. >> >> > > That really depends on the application and your server hardware. I've > used Highpoint cards with success. Others are quite pleased with > 3ware products and there are others. I would suggest you research > some possibilities and then query the group for feedback on the > particular models you are condidering. > > -- > Jeff Hinrichs > Dundee Media & Technology, Inc > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I am currently running the Highpoint RocketRaid 454 (ATA RAID, they offer SATA as well). I am very happy with it and Highpoint. The only caveat is that it takes a little bit of time to support new releases, but not a long wait. Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 18:55:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6379F16A47C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from vsmtp1.tin.it (vsmtp1.tin.it [212.216.176.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5632843D60 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:55:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from [10.155.100.8] (82.53.171.71) by vsmtp1.tin.it (7.2.072.1) (authenticated as vdemart1@tin.it) id 455B105500366539 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:55:41 +0100 From: vittorio To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:55:19 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611231955.20223.vdemart1@tin.it> Subject: Re: IPFW & NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:55:46 -0000 Well I tried something similar to your ipfw add xxx allow udp from ${client} to ${server} ${nfsports} keep-state ipfw add 300 allow udp from 10.0.0.2 to 10.0.0.1 2049,111,1022 setup=20 keep-state (it differs from your line for the setup option). It ddidn't worked at all. Afterwards, following Cuck's advise, I had a go at modifying the ipfw firew= all=20 in the nfs client 10.0.0.2 (no firewall for the time being on the nfs serve= r=20 10.0.0.1) and added towards the end of the list, immediatedly before the ve= ry=20 laste line denying everything else 50000 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.0.2 51000 allow ip from 10.0.0.2 to 10.0.0.1 65535 deny ip from any to any=20 It seemed to works.... partially! I mean that I could mount_nfs the share i= n=20 the client, surfing the directories, reading and writing files in the share= ,=20 BUT ... out of the blue, after some minutes the client freezed and I had to= =20 reboot :-( brutally turning off and on the box. Help please Vittorio Alle 05:25, gioved=EC 23 novembre 2006, Ian Smith ha scritto: > vittorio wrote: > > I have two FreeBSD 6.1 boxes one of which (IP 10.0.0.1) is an NFS serv= er > > and the other one (IP 10.0.0.2) is, among other things, an NFS client > > sharing directories with the NFS server. > > It all works correctly and I can mount_nfs all the directories from the > > server. > > BUT, I'm now trying to use an IPFW firewall both on the server and on > > the client. My simple aim is to setup connections between the 10.0.0.1 > > server and the 10.0.0.2 client ** only **; no connections should be > > possible with other clients! > > Now I've tried the poor documentation I could find googling with the > > keywords "freebsd ipfw nfs" to no avail, I cannot mount_nfs any share = on > > te client because something goes wrong with RPC. > > Concentrating on the client side (no ipfw for the moment on teh server) > > I tried the following > > > > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 2049,111,1022 to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0 > > setup keep-state > > > > OR > > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.0.2 2049,111,1022 via fxp0 > > setup keep-state > > > > OR > > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 2049,111,1022 to me via fxp0 setup > > keep-state > > > > OR > > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 to me 2049,111,1022 via fxp0 setup > > keep-state > > > > If I disable the firewall it all goes smootly. > > Firstly, what Chuck and Bill said .. but some further points .. > > Secondly, you don't specify port numbers with 'allow ip', which covers > tcp, udp and raw ip packets also; you want 'allow udp' here, unless of > course you're using NFS over TCP as well, where you'd need 'allow tcp'. > Note also that 'setup' only applies to TCP connections. > > Thirdly, if you do want to use stateful rules on the client, you'll do > better doing them on your _outbound_ connections, something like: > > ipfw add xxx allow udp from ${client} to ${server} ${nfsports} keep-sta= te > > If it were me I'd concentrate on the server side firewall rules (and > /etc/exports allowed hosts) both for allowing desired and disallowing > undesired connections, so not having to worry much about what client/s > may or may not be doing. > > 'man ipfw' is actually pretty good documentation, though there is a fair > bit to absorb there. I still read it before bedtime now and again :) > > Ciao, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 19:20:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A2016A538 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B03343D64 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:19:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52361A3C20; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:20:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1634451438; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:20:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:20:11 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061123192011.GA81772@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061123075214.GA51991@xor.obsecurity.org> <200611231735.RAA19097@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611231735.RAA19097@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:20:27 -0000 --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:35:08AM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > > > > hw.ata.wc=3D3D3D0 > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > "Make my hard drive go reeeeally slow please (just in case I crash)= " :) > > >=3D20 > > > Slower, yes, but not *that* slow. > > >=3D20 > > > Normal ls : 0.032 second. Two processes using same disk, multiply by= two, > > > so 0.064 second. Maybe the multiplier is more than 2, call it 10x, so > > > 0.32 second. But I'm seeing a factor of over 9100x. > >=20 > > Humour me and turn it back on, then see what happens. >=20 > Where is the knob to turn the write cache on/off on a per-drive basis > in FreeBSD? I can do this in NetBSD, but the only knob I can find in > FreeBSD affects all drives, and requires a reboot. Yes, I think you need to do it globally at boot time. > Humour me and read the Subject line. The ls does not get its fair share > of disk I/O. >=20 > Both times are with the disk's write cache in write-through mode. > I'm not comparing times with the write cache in different modes. > I'm comparing ls by itself against ls competing with cp. Your cp is going to be running synchronously, i.e. spend a lot of time waiting on the disk to perform the writes. This may well be the cause of your problem. Once we have established whether or not it is the cause, we can proceed to whether this behaviour can be improved. Kris --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZfRrWry0BWjoQKURAmOMAKCeJjucWvpLHjlO6TOG/A9VC7ztRACg69SP pPINBxcReVcqFVTqjKrtGuY= =BQeY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 19:22:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E37816A416 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822BA43D99 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:21:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2091A3C20 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:21:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4888151379; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:21:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:21:33 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061123192133.GB81772@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <83083882-E193-445F-AF3D-E3ECD1E243B1@hughes.net> <20061111063049.GA81772@xor.obsecurity.org> <608516EC-BBD0-40E7-A773-2E8056981FAA@hughes.net> <20061111195632.GA8718@xor.obsecurity.org> <4565812E.6060604@netfence.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l76fUT7nc3MelDdI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4565812E.6060604@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 6.x hangs on AMD64 again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:22:15 -0000 --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:08:30PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > I compiled the kernel with debug info, but that's totally useless, since= =20 > it won't dump anything, just hang there; I don't think even DDB would=20 > help, since even the keyboard is not working at that time. Come on, you didn't even try it? :) Kris --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZfS8Wry0BWjoQKURAqe1AJ9OjGsUFMkNjCChbJ5nR2HJ0puyTgCg0mNg Tnf+Qd3cWTY7GwWZeSkn20Q= =deaS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 19:22:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD5E16A4C8 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F47743D90 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:21:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.139] (helo=anti-virus01-10) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GnK9I-0006Bh-6w; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:22:16 +0000 Received: from [82.41.32.108] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GnK9E-0004VD-1U; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:22:12 +0000 Message-ID: <4565F4E3.3010609@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:22:11 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0611230634j6bcff387r14d1d8912e3a208c@mail.gmail.com> <4565EBCF.8080008@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <4565EBCF.8080008@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help... Installing from Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:22:35 -0000 Frank Staals wrote: > VeeJay wrote: > >> If I will install Apache2 from the Port, how can I configure to add >> module >> or disable modules? > >> >> If we can configure in Port, so where it could be done and how? and >> if its >> in a file, where it would be placed? >> > > go to the apache2 dir in your portstree ( generally > /usr/ports/www/apache2/ ) run 'make config' to set options, if the > specific options aren't there: copy the Makefile to Makefile.orig and > add the '--enable-OPTION' and '--disable-OPTION' with the other > compile options. > > For apache22 "make show-options" gives you instructions. It is highly unlikely you would need to do anything to the Makefile. You can place the configuration options in /etc/make.conf, or in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf if you use portupgrade, exactly as any other port. For example, I use the following in pkgtools.conf in the MAKE_ARGS section: 'apache-2*' => [ 'WITHOUT_IPV6=1', 'WITH_AUTH_MODULES=1', 'WITH_LDAP_MODULES=1', 'WITH_MISC_MODULES=1', 'WITH_PROXY_MODULES=1', 'WITH_THREADS_MODULES=1', 'WITH_SUEXEC_MODULES=1', 'WITH_DBM=bdb', 'WITH_BERKELEYDB=FreeBSD', ], > Not sure though: but aren't a lot of those options also settable in > the apache config file ? it might be a better idea to check that out > first, so if you ever change your mind about a setting you don't have > to recompile your intire apache2 port. AFAIK, You can use the apache config file to leave out a module which you have compiled, but you can't make use of a module which you haven't compiled. --Alex PS Simply reading /usr/ports/apache22/Makefile would have answered your question about how to set which modules to use. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 19:24:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1219916A4C2 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A99C43D73 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:23:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003C81A3C20; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:23:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B6B95128A; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:23:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:23:20 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: markoco Message-ID: <20061123192320.GC81772@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4565906c.271.6885.175810917@beotel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="da4uJneut+ArUgXk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4565906c.271.6885.175810917@beotel.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:24:39 -0000 --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 01:13:32PM +0100, markoco wrote: > After downloading and burning FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE ia64 CD-s > from your ftp, I've try to install it and sysinstall don't > boot. Please help me to solve this problem. Thanks >=20 > Mac OS X 10.4.6 You seem to be confused about what kind of hardware you have :) Mac OS X doesn't run on ia64 machines, so perhaps you really wanted the i386 or amd64 versions of FreeBSD if your intention was to run FreeBSD on that machine. Kris --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZfUoWry0BWjoQKURAi1AAJ91649AnloMccluDb9ESnbkCy5OXQCgkfAh KloCfprZwIjQKg62AzO0FVQ= =6l2V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --da4uJneut+ArUgXk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 19:34:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286E816A412 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:34:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from probsdorg@yahoo.com) Received: from web52411.mail.yahoo.com (web52411.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76CEE43DA4 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:33:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from probsdorg@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 77893 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Nov 2006 19:34:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=pvhqt/ypYpHf3k5QDumMM8YdP+rZJHiC44cjJfJmf3A49dBfaQqvi5INBE/VwcL/mJsJA5Bu9h7ct5JyUy9zdndc134u8YuZfIck+icHfoPjjywAEhHTvdpekMyEiVj0pvPY1OB5vyj3+eM6EuFtTCyA8qSkzSDLyAsyRt+KvwA=; X-YMail-OSG: AwwV3doVM1lJ6f4qbh8Z8hEEM8BIX2_Zew7O2On_Qj5Qj3.QBCF06SvXpLAu7l1HfeoIqlUTbkXvXc4OmKjyF7NHX6Y_dN2GRA8XNo9Oe.PyknkBpMagOtWzz8zGBDG2DYi8szx3l0ozWUQ- Received: from [68.225.82.218] by web52411.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:34:35 PST Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:34:35 -0800 (PST) From: probsd org To: Alex Zbyslaw , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4565D130.3050607@dial.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <172523.77305.qm@web52411.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Java JRE (latest) | Mozilla 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:34:57 -0000 Alex Zbyslaw wrote: probsd org wrote: >Hey group. I'm using the latest Firefox2 (non-linux) and have the latest diablo-jre15 port installed. I'm finding that the plugin for firefox causes firefox to freeze consistently. For example, when accessing myspace, as soon as I click on Myspace's mail link firefox will freeze immediately everytime. When I turn javascript off in firefox then all works fine (except to send mail in myspace you have to have javascript enabled). > >I tried the FreeBSDfoundations JRE package but it said it required a past version javawrapper. > java and javascript are completely unrelated(*) so updating Java is unlikely to fix a problem if it's source is, as you think, javascript. --Alex (*) It is quite possible for java and javascript to interact, and this has been an area of great inconsistency and numerous timing bugs in many, many browsers over the years, but nothing you've said points to java being used at all. Firefox2 lets you disable java (as opposed to javascript) so you could try that and see if that helps, but it seems like a shot in the dark with too little info to me. OK, it looks like it's a javascript issue. With JAVA loaded myspace works fine. With javascript loaded firefox freezes. I'm guessing this is myspace's issue. --------------------------------- Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 19:48:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B00716A4FF for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD5643DAE for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:47:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kANJlfv8012690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:47:42 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [140.142.167.19] (cs331-18.spmodem.washington.edu [140.142.167.19]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kANJlbcC006884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:47:40 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <200611230757.11410.GregoryC@stcinc.com> References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <200611230757.11410.GregoryC@stcinc.com> X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5DDF6D7C-4FF7-4857-B07E-4462F3C89F97@u.washington.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:47:35 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.11.23.113435 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='LEO_OBFU_SUBJ_RE 0.1, __C230066_P2 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:48:37 -0000 On Nov 23, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Gregory Carvalho wrote: > You might consider a safe with A/C from Black Box. Expensive, but > an option > for you. > > On Tuesday 21 November 2006 19:41, VeeJay wrote: >> Hi >> >> I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly >> appreciated. >> >> I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place? >> >> I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine >> in single >> user mode and steal the data? >> How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in single user >> mode, it >> still demands the password and without password one cannot do >> anything? >> or make it possible that booting in Single user mode, doesn't >> provide any >> shell? >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> -- >> >> BR / vj >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Being able to Kensington lock the machine so that it can't be opened (thinking of Dells), you can prevent physical access to a large degree (only have to worry about people that can screw up the lock), and prevent people from taking the drive OR resetting the CMOS jumper, giving people access to the BIOS without a password (one thing that many people haven't mentioned about security so far). -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 20:26:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA2A16A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7698E43D4C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:25:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (cpe-024-163-054-055.nc.res.rr.com [24.163.54.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kANKQ0dG042877 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:26:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:25:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*. X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: creating a "broken" graid3 array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:26:01 -0000 Is it possible to create a (degraded) graid3 array with only two (or one less than the planned total) providers? I'm asking since I would like to move from my current one-disk setup to a three-disk raid3 array, but I'd like the disk currently in use to be a member of the array and I don't have anywhere to conveniently back up the data already there. I'd like to create a degraded graid3 array with the two new components, copy the data from the current disk to the array, and then add the current disk in to the array. If that's not a possibility, can anyone suggest a way to get the same end result? Thanks, JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 20:59:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594B216A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FD343D49 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:58:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so620845wxc for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:58:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RiIp/c4d2idaUAZRLrmD5ZmOhi9/Wu+DEJ9rEXKVFqifix3XpHNhgsnv4Xj1DCXxz4WGzCYD3OZQzfZdjQmPaLUbPyWjzxR53KBhscOXDzaUabY1eiOqdfH61EpFu6g6DChJC+xdkfWRdMxC99VJd/hVhGQcBY4YPFg1goKFiOw= Received: by 10.70.36.9 with SMTP id j9mr17397239wxj.1164315538128; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:58:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.14.15 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:58:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0611231258l2c432daawc0640f63485e71cf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:58:57 +0100 From: "Christian Walther" To: "Garrett Cooper" In-Reply-To: <5DDF6D7C-4FF7-4857-B07E-4462F3C89F97@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <200611230757.11410.GregoryC@stcinc.com> <5DDF6D7C-4FF7-4857-B07E-4462F3C89F97@u.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:59:01 -0000 > Being able to Kensington lock the machine so that it can't be opened > (thinking of Dells), you can prevent physical access to a large > degree (only have to worry about people that can screw up the lock), > and prevent people from taking the drive OR resetting the CMOS > jumper, giving people access to the BIOS without a password (one > thing that many people haven't mentioned about security so far). > -Garrett Sorry to disappoint you, but Kensington locks can easily be unlocked, using a toilet paper roll, pen, and tape. We tried this at work because my collegue protected his flat screen with it, but forgot his key at home on the day we moved to a new office. We needed a bit longer, thou... The video is wmv, but I didn't find a version in another format (but mplayer can play it): http://www.toool.nl/kensington623.wmv I wonder if the data on this machine is as sensitive as this thread suggests it... ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 21:00:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B8216A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F66D43D73 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:59:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so511893uge for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:00:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=lFQDOEZzI/B9KGnsciO37DUbyH6kG67KTK7SnWi+/FaonI1gBMfNd5MyVRvIJxE/4Z5ExyQpd43ROjtahDD2PYoYgrqP7GQ3sj7CzIg8uRuQyMJwv6yjJwQ+oRL/1UodFFWW5oZa+HqbyNqnSq44fqRR6+ek39MYMaM8vDbD2Qg= Received: by 10.78.185.15 with SMTP id i15mr5590928huf.1164315600750; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:00:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:00:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "John Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <200611231525.58206.lists@jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200611231525.58206.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: cb0ccd70d97da1c7 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: creating a "broken" graid3 array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:00:22 -0000 On 11/23/06, John Nielsen wrote: > Is it possible to create a (degraded) graid3 array Maybe you'll be able to create graid3 with md0 as the third member (based on sparse file for example) and later emulate a failure (md0 disappears) and insert your hard drive. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 22:06:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B68616A416 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:06:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from usleepless@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D47243D66 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:06:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from usleepless@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so521276uge for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:06:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NCLQpw+WDHvQ/4S1OajT8r6Y9ChlMFYIrCTJnWQFifc4Lt/aMzwhbN4ASkxhzEVLC067lXZAvE0RD30uamvG2K6kq0OgmxeixERigC+KhgqcoHNmZuBBQZ9ipIcZvblPgFpOqvU59uQTRDxmE6uWvMSWPPCQKi3uUeIIzBpVmr0= Received: by 10.78.128.11 with SMTP id a11mr9580899hud.1164319597188; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:06:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.124.8 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:06:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:06:37 +0100 From: usleepless@gmail.com To: "John Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <200611231525.58206.lists@jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200611231525.58206.lists@jnielsen.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: creating a "broken" graid3 array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:06:46 -0000 John, On 11/23/06, John Nielsen wrote: > Is it possible to create a (degraded) graid3 array with only two (or one > less than the planned total) providers? I'm asking since I would like to > move from my current one-disk setup to a three-disk raid3 array, but I'd > like the disk currently in use to be a member of the array and I don't have > anywhere to conveniently back up the data already there. I'd like to create > a degraded graid3 array with the two new components, copy the data from the > current disk to the array, and then add the current disk in to the array. > > If that's not a possibility, can anyone suggest a way to get the same end > result? while i know close to nothing about raid, here is what i think: 1. you have no backup ( otherwise you could pull it off ) 2. you are trying to achieve your goal through a tricky method ( me thinks anyways :-) is the loss of your data worth less than the cost of an extra hd? if so, buy another hd. if not, make a clean install? and assuming a 3 hd raid setup, would it not be wise to have a spare hd anyway? what's the point? regards, usleep From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 22:08:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BAC16A40F for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C54743DBB for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:07:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so370432pyh for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:08:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=stUjTspIWTU95eN4+/lf2KpuhJNwQzUyTH3dhH5z0E4ra9Z3iQmkByxxIhnQARgSZP4sQLMSsocef2+9Ik9h2oKNesQ0Q4XfsUMAmeHKNoMyvShrePuDJrjcb52knNx7FXGrueje0DplkDZzq/nexPL+bGQ3KfwvoD21bavSQaM= Received: by 10.35.96.7 with SMTP id y7mr4316730pyl.1164319698647; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:08:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611231408l4a95b0bfo96bb5dfe5187fbbc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:08:18 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Bill Moran" In-Reply-To: <20061123082403.b8afea32.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> <20061123082403.b8afea32.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:08:43 -0000 On 11/23/06, Bill Moran wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:45:19 +0100 > VeeJay wrote: > > > On 11/23/06, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > > > > > And how can one into the System by booting from a CD if it still > > > > requires the Password even in Single User mode? > > > > > > Booting from CD, floppy or hard disk is slected at BIOS level. > > > > > > Booting in single or multi user mode is at Operating system level. > > > > > > Booting is in the following order: > > > > > > 1) BIOS select what medium to boot from > > > > > > 2) the operating system boot from the selected medium > > > > > > So when it comes to the Single user password, itis already at stage 2) > > > it has passed the stage 1 (booting from hard disk ofr CD) without > > > password. > > > > > > Olivier > > > > > > > So, it means, that I should take the following steps > > > > 1. Password on BIOS > > 2. Change the order of booting i.e. When system is installed and working > > once, then I just the change the Booting FIRST from HardDisk. > > 3. Put the password on Single User mode. > > > > So, what more? Do you people think that I have got somehow security > barrier > > for unauthorized access? > > Physically _LOCK_ the server up. Anyone who can get physical access to > the > unit can remove the drive and access it from another machine, bypassing > all > this stuff. > > Another option is to encrypt the hard drives, but this will require you > (or > someone else) to enter the password for the encrypted drives every time > the > system boots up, so it's generally a maintenance nightmare. > Well, I am not an expert on FreeBSD. And thats why I don't know that how it works that If 4 Disks of same size for example 146GB each and they are configured with RAID 10, and Root, SWAP, /usr, /var File systems have been created on them. And if one takes one or two harddisks and how come he would be able to read the data when data is splited on 4 disks? -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 22:10:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0596116A40F for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from usleepless@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99F743D83 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:09:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from usleepless@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so962993nfc for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:10:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Y6Zxr4xEUkKOUZFcSg3/EuDXb2NfHfWx9fDg0BZgERP3BtbV3s0//4PYXjqy9gf+L0pzd14rpxHeMxfSvChKd/iK1AfzshuGM1uBYnOEWn1t1tA2dHHrr4bJpaFuKS5vPOiIGAyiHigRP29OVAX2qNiaIZ2WMzyjaWY7iyNJLjc= Received: by 10.78.160.2 with SMTP id i2mr9580300hue.1164319823417; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:10:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.124.8 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:10:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:10:23 +0100 From: usleepless@gmail.com To: "John Nielsen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200611231525.58206.lists@jnielsen.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: creating a "broken" graid3 array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:10:31 -0000 > is the loss of your data worth less than the cost of an extra hd? if > so, buy another hd. if not, make a clean install? should read: is the cost of an extra hd less than the value of your data/install? if so, buy another hd. if not, make a clean install? regards, usleep From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 22:24:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9131D16A412 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from outmail.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46B243D58 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:23:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from ariel.njm.f2s.com (i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net [195.137.21.170]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375C1534A1 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:24:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ariel.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by ariel.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kANMOWZP037346 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:24:32 GMT (envelope-from njm@ariel.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by ariel.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kANMOWrL037345 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:24:32 GMT (envelope-from njm) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:24:32 +0000 From: "N.J. Mann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061123222432.GC34559@ariel.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> <20061123082403.b8afea32.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <2cd0a0da0611231408l4a95b0bfo96bb5dfe5187fbbc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611231408l4a95b0bfo96bb5dfe5187fbbc@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: How RAID 10 works (was: Re: Password Security) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:24:34 -0000 PMFJI On Thu 23 Nov 23:08, VeeJay wrote: > Well, I am not an expert on FreeBSD. And thats why I don't know that how it > works that > > If 4 Disks of same size for example 146GB each and they are configured with > RAID 10, and Root, SWAP, /usr, /var File systems have been created on them. > And if one takes one or two harddisks and how come he would be able to read > the data when data is splited on 4 disks? With a four disk RAID 10 array you would need two (or more) drives and it would have to be the right two in order to read _all_ of the data. See: http://www.techtutorials.net/tutorials/hardware/raid.shtml RAID 10 is near the bottom. Cheers, Nick. -- "Elves are wonderful. They provoke wonder. Elves are marvellous. They provoke marvels. Elves are fantastic. They create fantasies. Elves are glamorous. They project glamour. Elves are enchanting. They weave enchantment. Elves are terrific. They beget terror. No-one ever said elves are _nice_. Elves are _bad_." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 22:34:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1E216A403 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:34:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A75043D49 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:33:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so373997pyh for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:34:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=hTmHgbCRg1qlA/ZvA4pNyTt64EkPM8RC+S3UKXQmf00is6NxlqKLwD3VbVcTblTUaUOLIiOHQaJLpTXEWYlijKoNPjVCX414hibU3LEx82vCChgpNOUerkcx/glDy2VzVct/sqqWA6f2f0njDDWbNa+WksYHZ8ykb41+7VNx+e0= Received: by 10.35.34.20 with SMTP id m20mr4364566pyj.1164321242109; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:34:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:34:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611231434rbccc96eq855d195ebf8b9713@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:34:01 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Frank Staals" In-Reply-To: <4565EBCF.8080008@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611230634j6bcff387r14d1d8912e3a208c@mail.gmail.com> <4565EBCF.8080008@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help... Installing from Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:34:03 -0000 On 11/23/06, Frank Staals wrote: > > VeeJay wrote: > > Hi > > > > If I will install Apache2 from the Port, how can I configure to add > > module > > or disable modules? > > Like if I want to enable following modules, how can I do them VIA Ports? > > Please find below the text from this Step-by-Step guide I am using. > > But that > > procedure is for manually downloading the archive, checking signatures > > and > > then configuring.... > > > > But how can I use Port system to get the same results? > > > > > make install > > > > chown -R root:sys /usr/local/apache2 > > > > > > ----------------- > > > > If we can configure in Port, so where it could be done and how? and if > > its > > in a file, where it would be placed? > > > > go to the apache2 dir in your portstree ( generally > /usr/ports/www/apache2/ ) run 'make config' to set options, if the > specific options aren't there: copy the Makefile to Makefile.orig and > add the '--enable-OPTION' and '--disable-OPTION' with the other compile > options. > > Not sure though: but aren't a lot of those options also settable in the > apache config file ? it might be a better idea to check that out first, > so if you ever change your mind about a setting you don't have to > recompile your intire apache2 port. > > -- > -Frank Staals > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > Hi When I give "make config" command I get error as follow: # make config ===> No options to configure I have also tried --enable-OPTION and --disable-OPTION... but didn't had any luck.... :( -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 22:47:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E043816A407 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:47:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E8E43D5A for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:46:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:47:27 -0500 id 00056412.456624FF.0000B0CD Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:47:26 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: VeeJay Message-Id: <20061123174726.1eec4184.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611231408l4a95b0bfo96bb5dfe5187fbbc@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> <20061123082403.b8afea32.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <2cd0a0da0611231408l4a95b0bfo96bb5dfe5187fbbc@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:47:34 -0000 On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:08:18 +0100 VeeJay wrote: > On 11/23/06, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:45:19 +0100 > > VeeJay wrote: > > > > > On 11/23/06, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > > > > > > > And how can one into the System by booting from a CD if it still > > > > > requires the Password even in Single User mode? > > > > > > > > Booting from CD, floppy or hard disk is slected at BIOS level. > > > > > > > > Booting in single or multi user mode is at Operating system level. > > > > > > > > Booting is in the following order: > > > > > > > > 1) BIOS select what medium to boot from > > > > > > > > 2) the operating system boot from the selected medium > > > > > > > > So when it comes to the Single user password, itis already at stage 2) > > > > it has passed the stage 1 (booting from hard disk ofr CD) without > > > > password. > > > > > > > > Olivier > > > > > > > > > > So, it means, that I should take the following steps > > > > > > 1. Password on BIOS > > > 2. Change the order of booting i.e. When system is installed and working > > > once, then I just the change the Booting FIRST from HardDisk. > > > 3. Put the password on Single User mode. > > > > > > So, what more? Do you people think that I have got somehow security > > barrier > > > for unauthorized access? > > > > Physically _LOCK_ the server up. Anyone who can get physical access to > > the > > unit can remove the drive and access it from another machine, bypassing > > all > > this stuff. > > > > Another option is to encrypt the hard drives, but this will require you > > (or > > someone else) to enter the password for the encrypted drives every time > > the > > system boots up, so it's generally a maintenance nightmare. > > > > > Well, I am not an expert on FreeBSD. And thats why I don't know that how it > works that > > If 4 Disks of same size for example 146GB each and they are configured with > RAID 10, and Root, SWAP, /usr, /var File systems have been created on them. > And if one takes one or two harddisks and how come he would be able to read > the data when data is splited on 4 disks? Your logic escapes me. If someone were to physically break in to the machine to steal your data, why would they only take some of the drives? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 23:08:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954EC16A586 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:08:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763EB43D5C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:07:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: from localhost (mail [127.0.0.12]) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4284241C5; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:08:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdforen.de Received: from mail.bsdforen.de ([127.0.0.12]) by localhost (mail.bsdforen.de [127.0.0.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Db8EcQmMLcpq; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:08:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from loki.starkstrom.lan (p549CDE10.dip.t-dialin.net [84.156.222.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E5B4241BF; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:08:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:07:31 +0100 From: Joerg Pernfuss To: VeeJay Message-ID: <20061124000731.17ebf8ae@loki.starkstrom.lan> In-Reply-To: <20061123174726.1eec4184.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> <20061123082403.b8afea32.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <2cd0a0da0611231408l4a95b0bfo96bb5dfe5187fbbc@mail.gmail.com> <20061123174726.1eec4184.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_NOA6mQb/5JMQV4Oz5F_=qPZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:08:34 -0000 --Sig_NOA6mQb/5JMQV4Oz5F_=qPZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:47:26 -0500 Bill Moran wrote: > > Well, I am not an expert on FreeBSD. And thats why I don't know > > that how it works that > >=20 > > If 4 Disks of same size for example 146GB each and they are > > configured with RAID 10, and Root, SWAP, /usr, /var File systems > > have been created on them. And if one takes one or two harddisks > > and how come he would be able to read the data when data is splited > > on 4 disks? >=20 > Your logic escapes me. If someone were to physically break in to the > machine to steal your data, why would they only take some of the > drives? And to add to it, just in case this comes up next: if the drives are attached to some kind of external controller, of course one takes that too. Even easier if you steal a geom based software-raid10. just put the drives into a freebsd box and the volume appears (if glabel is also used). Otherwise you'll have to do some juggling, but surely no rocket sience. --=20 | /"\ ASCII ribbon | GnuPG Key ID | e86d b753 3deb e749 6c3a | | \ / campaign against | 0xbbcaad24 | 5706 1f7d 6cfd bbca ad24 | | X HTML in email | .the next sentence is true. | | / \ and news | .the previous sentence was a lie. | --Sig_NOA6mQb/5JMQV4Oz5F_=qPZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZimzH31s/bvKrSQRAqYUAJ9tnjFDqqYXOyxLghzseqtjogSjawCfXMa9 6QUp2KWoOWCJiGxV4AQ7h74= =5z1w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_NOA6mQb/5JMQV4Oz5F_=qPZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 23:10:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0395116A40F for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E4143D5D for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:10:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (cpe-024-163-054-055.nc.res.rr.com [24.163.54.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kANNAadG027508; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:10:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:10:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200611231525.58206.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611231810.34234.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: usleepless@gmail.com Subject: Re: creating a "broken" graid3 array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:10:42 -0000 On Thursday 23 November 2006 17:10, usleepless@gmail.com wrote: > > is the loss of your data worth less than the cost of an extra hd? if > > so, buy another hd. if not, make a clean install? > > should read: > is the cost of an extra hd less than the value of your data/install? if > so, buy another hd. if not, make a clean install? I have backups of the data that can't be reproduced. I just don't have room for some of the larger files (CD ISO's, DVD rips, etc). It would be inconvenient to lose the data but far from catastrophic. One goal of this exercise is to get some redundancy, but at least as important are the goals of learning more about something I haven't used before (graid3) and getting a larger volume on a limited budget. Besides, trickery is where the fun comes in. :) I appreciate the response, though. It's a point I might have raised myself. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 23:11:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE4816A40F; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC64843D45; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:10:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (cpe-024-163-054-055.nc.res.rr.com [24.163.54.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kANNBadG027637; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:11:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:11:34 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200611231525.58206.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611231811.35091.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: creating a "broken" graid3 array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:11:37 -0000 On Thursday 23 November 2006 16:00, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 11/23/06, John Nielsen wrote: > > Is it possible to create a (degraded) graid3 array > > Maybe you'll be able to create graid3 with md0 as > the third member (based on sparse file for example) > and later emulate a failure (md0 disappears) and > insert your hard drive. That's the thought I had as well after I posted. I'll probably give that a try once I'm ready to get started. Thanks, JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 00:20:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F8016A415 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from regi.ntavares@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758FA43D46 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:20:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from regi.ntavares@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so992945nfc for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:20:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=KzL6PLAfQU8bFPGe4Y26GAQCc164QC2Xxh0bY4UQvcCPKdqeWbeR5IoS274kjj2C9dc74fZ/tbJIf6ArBQjnir1TDDkVsqLdCx318pKTODeMm/wvCDl/9C8CCo/XTO3TB8a9GVGkTZJbUP1bTH52dqGIKNLyYm9S4b0+HNX1PcI= Received: by 10.49.43.2 with SMTP id v2mr4788669nfj.1164327650994; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:20:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.59.19 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:20:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7bdd75440611231620y5229a6a0qc1b157010dcd8cb0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:20:50 -0200 From: "Reginaldo Tavares" To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:20:53 -0000 Hi, I am trying to install a Fbsd 6.1 in a desktop with an optical mouse. The xorg.conf file has /dev/sysmouse and protocol auto, but I it is not working. Regi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 01:32:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232B616A407 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBD843D46 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:31:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 26845 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2006 12:32:25 +1100 Received: from 218-214-43-14.people.net.au (HELO localhost) (218.214.43.14) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Nov 2006 12:32:25 +1100 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:32:21 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Reginaldo Tavares" Message-ID: <20061124123221.5fbfac8f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <7bdd75440611231620y5229a6a0qc1b157010dcd8cb0@mail.gmail.com> References: <7bdd75440611231620y5229a6a0qc1b157010dcd8cb0@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:32:29 -0000 On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:20:50 -0200 "Reginaldo Tavares" wrote: > I am trying to install a Fbsd 6.1 in a desktop with an optical mouse. > The xorg.conf file has /dev/sysmouse and protocol auto, > but I it is not working. do you have moused running? (i.e., is your mouse running on the text-based virtual console?) if it is, then run xorgcfg, take all the defaults and it'll/should just work. _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 02:00:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2765516A407 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 02:00:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D79843D4C for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:59:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAO1xJPr066215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:59:20 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id kAO203e2093377; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:00:03 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:00:03 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200611240200.kAO203e2093377@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: maanjee@gmail.com In-reply-to: <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> (message from VeeJay on Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:45:19 +0100) References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> <200611230914.kAN9E2GW065034@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <2cd0a0da0611230145j3b5f42cfg7b9025236a91e7a3@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: jerrymc@msu.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 02:00:16 -0000 > 1. Password on BIOS Knowing that it is enought to remove the battery in order to remove the BIOS password. > 2. Change the order of booting i.e. When system is installed and working > once, then I just the change the Booting FIRST from HardDisk. You can also consider to remove the CD and floppy drives. Modern machines can boot from USB CD when needed. > 3. Put the password on Single User mode. Right. 4. Encrypt your hard disk. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 02:03:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABAD16A403 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 02:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au (relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au [202.136.32.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB91043D92 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 02:02:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from [58.163.90.10] (helo=localhost) by relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GnQP4-0008Ci-CM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:02:58 +1100 From: Warren Liddell Organization: Blackthorne PTY LTD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:06:54 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611241206.55289.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: Continued Crashing of Mozilla FF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 02:03:13 -0000 Im using FreeBSD6.2-PRERELEASE with the latest version of Mozilla FF via ports ... Quite frequently when i try to download a file FF will hang then close itself down, no crash handling etc appears it simply closes itself .. .core file is 50meg so a URL is provided if anyone wishes to view it. http://shinjitsu.no-ip.org/ff.core From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 05:03:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0301F16A412 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:03:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C03F43D45 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:03:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 5907 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2006 16:03:54 +1100 Received: from 218-214-43-14.people.net.au (HELO localhost) (218.214.43.14) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Nov 2006 16:03:54 +1100 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:03:51 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: Rachel Florentine Message-ID: <20061124160351.20da1165@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20061123060648.77253.qmail@web57802.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20061123060648.77253.qmail@web57802.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting Qmail & Ezmlm To Work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:03:57 -0000 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:06:48 -0800 (PST) Rachel Florentine wrote: > if you can please provide the command to build ezmlm-idx. it's in the ports : /usr/ports/mail/ezmlm-idx just install it as any other port _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding." Justice Louis D. Brandeis I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 05:10:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7435916A403 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from relay2.av-mx.com (relay2.av-mx.com [137.118.16.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C3743D53 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:09:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) X-Virus-Scan-Time: 0 Received: from [137.118.16.55] (HELO mx3.av-mx.com) by relay2.av-mx.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 488658495 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:10:23 -0500 Received: (qmail 12208 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2006 05:10:23 -0000 Received: from dsl10006.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.66?) (micahjon@ywave.com@12.178.97.6) by mx3.av-mx.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2006 05:10:23 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 12.178.97.6 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl10006.ywave.com Message-ID: <45667EBD.3080202@ywave.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:10:21 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Liddell References: <200611241206.55289.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200611241206.55289.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Continued Crashing of Mozilla FF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:10:25 -0000 Warren Liddell wrote: > Im using FreeBSD6.2-PRERELEASE with the latest version of Mozilla FF via > ports ... > > Quite frequently when i try to download a file FF will hang then close itself > down, no crash handling etc appears it simply closes itself .. .core file is > 50meg so a URL is provided if anyone wishes to view it. > > http://shinjitsu.no-ip.org/ff.core Check out this PR to see if it's the same issue: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=105589 If it is the same issue, could you /please/ post a follow up so the maintainers know that it's affecting more users than just me? Thanks, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 05:16:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19CB16A415 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nilton.volpato@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7012E43D55 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:15:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nilton.volpato@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1057078nfc for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:16:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NzNo73KR3JtHiKHC+hgdLE+IpFG2wDjw/5fbPuCejhPFfsDrDMIQ5vUcnxJeWLwJe3q71MlldHLCSt5xIySBmNrD+FMQjFjljGPb7m1dpuX1I0N7xN2oUXxF9MO3NGnXpz4RNqXjvaqhAk0IbB24WrESVQ80ZdZ3SQHS1Kfs6Zc= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr9947024huf.1164345385248; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:16:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.126.15 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:16:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27fef5640611232116o6e26cbcbx230d13981270bb89@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 02:16:25 -0300 From: "Nilton Volpato" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ipfw@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: Subject: Re: port redirection with natd and ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:16:28 -0000 [Fratiman Vladut] > This is because u try to access an ip that have same ip like your > gateway, but from internal lan, so packets are sends to gateway but > cannot be redirected back to the http server according with redirect > rules. > To resolve this situation, configure a simple dns server on your > gateway, and make a zone with your domain pointed to the internal ip. > Then configure the computers clients to ask your dns server. This is > easily done via dhcp. > Your dns server need to be configured to forward request's for unknow > domains to the autoritarive public dns servers. > -- > Best regards, > Fratiman [Russell Wood] > I had a similar setup once and used Split DNS with BIND. So, if you > requested example.com on 192.168.0.0/24 then you'd get the internal IP, > otherwise you got the external IP. > > Regards, > Russell Wood Thanks guys, But Split DNS does not work in my case. Because I have different services on different machines, and the dns will map one name (and all ports associated to it) to one machine. Is there any solution that will work without using split dns? Thanks, -- Nilton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 05:30:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BA216A415 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F4E43D45 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:29:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 7281 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2006 16:30:02 +1100 Received: from 218-214-43-14.people.net.au (HELO localhost) (218.214.43.14) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Nov 2006 16:30:02 +1100 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:29:59 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Graham Bentley" Message-ID: <20061124162959.4cac0ebc@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: <20061122073109.8714316A4FB@hub.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: > Subject: Re: Ezmlm Port Okay Or Junk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:30:06 -0000 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:04:06 -0000 "Graham Bentley" wrote: > I have noticed that quite alot of ports are broken on 6.2 > but then again I only loaded it a few days ago and havent > updated the tree (thinking this is the 'latest' version - flawed?) Mind explaining the problems you see in detail? I've been tracking the latest ports and kernel from 6.-RELEASE to , well, stable :) and I haven't noticed anything broken .. _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome If you find a solution and become attached to it, the solution may become your next problem. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 05:37:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F402916A5E7 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA8843D45 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:37:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 7675 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2006 16:37:57 +1100 Received: from 218-214-43-14.people.net.au (HELO localhost) (218.214.43.14) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Nov 2006 16:37:57 +1100 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:37:54 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20061124163754.5a11ddef@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20061123082520.af5d4265.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061122163317.GC50939@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <2cd0a0da0611230056l15bfccaamb3ed3d439e2786b8@mail.gmail.com> <20061123082520.af5d4265.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, VeeJay Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:37:59 -0000 On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:25:20 -0500 Bill Moran wrote: > > So, does it mean that Windows 2003 Server provides more Password Level > > Security with Unauthorized Access? > > Where is this presumption coming from? Windows OS suffer from the same > difficulty protecting from physical intrusion that any other OS does. Precisely - MS makes a very strong (and valid) point of saying that once 'the bad guys' have physical access to your box, the machine is owned. The was a (very cool) presentation in Ruxcon (ruxcon.org) this year about hacking into someone's machine via Firewire. And even if it was an exploit, neither the researcher/hacker nor MS would consider it "security issue", because to use this FW attack you need physical access... ie, you've lost the battle already, it's just a matter of picking your method of breaking in. In short, secure the box both physically and network / services-wise as much as possible. Best, _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome UFOs are for real: the Air Force doesn't exist. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 06:32:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490B916A40F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjayson.alvarez@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283A143D58 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:31:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markjayson.alvarez@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1072718nfc for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:32:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Rz2XpfcuXz+VKKjLdaYoyyP++0X/7ByZs5JrppTUzUSjKQeXt2pa62BtrDUVGevAzv8ETAOq77FP2K39dqx3Treslz7U+QqXk5vrfyNS4PeGn7rWqq29dF05IWaX82/eIee5HFHG3iufEWNn/2xdJrfAy7vj2znSnfideP8+St8= Received: by 10.78.17.1 with SMTP id 1mr9977437huq.1164349955036; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:32:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.198.7 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:32:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:32:35 +0800 From: "Mark Jayson Alvarez" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Knowing if someone really stole someone else's code X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:32:37 -0000 Hi, It's been almost three years since I started using opensource software, specifically FreeBSD. I'm glad that I'm learning a lot of things from it. Things that I'm sure I would never have learned if I haven't entered this so called opensource world. Things that I can say, have positively affected my life in a certain way. HALT!!! Before you proceed reading, let me just tell you.. If in anyway you feel, that this email, with such a catchy subject line, have completely gotten your attention and consumed at least 10 seconds of your most precious time that you think should have been spent for answering other freebsd related questions worth answering hence the list title "freebsd-questions", my deepest appologies. If by the looks of it you may have noticed that this email is not properly broken down into paragraphs or it contains MIME or was submitted in an HTML format that would really annoy you, or this should have been sent into -anyotherlist instead... appologies as well. I have tried my best not to sound like a troll, I've seen the netiquette RFCs, read a lot of how to ask good questions, where to ask it, came across the words like "just fucking google it", rtfm, bikesheds, flaming, apple vs. orange, that "doofus" thread, avoid saying you're a n00b.. etc. etc. still I can't help but ask this: If I download a program source code with, let's say BSD license, and compile it. How does one know if I really stole his code? If someone sue me, will the court require me to provide the source code for my program and compare it to what he's claiming is the original code? If this is the case, what if I really have my own version of the source code, but when I compile it, it runs a lot slower than his program, so I just use his program instead. And when the court ask me to show my source code, I would instead give my "slower" version of the source code. Will the court just let someone do the benchmark just to find out if what I gave was really the source code for my program? Thanks. -jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 06:50:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3068116A412 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0AE43D55 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:50:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GnUtS-00023v-Ro for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:50:38 +0000 Received: from esperance.zetnet.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with SMTP id kAO6ocmE003588 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:50:38 GMT Received: (qmail 9072 invoked by uid 1001); 24 Nov 2006 06:50:32 -0000 From: "Frank Shute" Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:50:32 +0000 To: Nilton Volpato Message-ID: <20061124065032.GA9023@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <27fef5640611171328r2973167dm2b58e1dc2e393bb7@mail.gmail.com> <27fef5640611181512p335c0900la2125c7110156dac@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27fef5640611181512p335c0900la2125c7110156dac@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 i386 X-Organisation: 'Esperance Linux' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:50:38 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port redirection with natd and ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:50:41 -0000 On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 09:12:30PM -0200, Nilton Volpato wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using a computer with FreeBSD as a gateway and NAT for a private > LAN. Let's say the gateway has external.com as external address, and > 192.168.0.1 as internal address, so that the LAN is 192.168.0.0/24. > > I'm doing a number of port redirects in the gateway, for svn, http, > https, ssh, etc using natd. However, these port redirects do not work > from inside the LAN. > > For instance, if I point my browser to http://external.com and I'm in > the LAN, then it will not work. I can't use the internal address of > the web server because none of the links will work on the web page. > > In summary, I want that my port redirections work also when I try to > connect to the gateway's external address from inside the LAN. > > I'm using a minimal ipfw configuration to try to solve this. This is > the default configuration. > > 00050 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via vr0 > 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 65000 allow ip from any to any > 65535 deny ip from any to any > > I tried to add: > > 00060 divert 8668 ip4 from 192.168.0.0/24 to external.com > > expecting that it would send the packets from LAN to natd, which would > apply the port redirections. But it did not work. > > How can I solve this? > > Thanks, > -- Nilton What I do in these circumstances is put a line in /etc/hosts on the machines on the LAN eg: 192.168.0.1 external.com If you've got a standard host.conf then it gets picked up before bind. Whilst it means you don't connect to the external interface of external.com it has the same effect and you can browse your site etc. No fancy firewall rules required either. HTH. -- Frank echo "f r a n k @ e s p e r a n c e - l i n u x . c o . u k" | sed 's/ //g' --->PGP keyID: 0x10BD6F4B<--- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 07:57:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7776B16A412 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2462743D46 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:56:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so722991wxc for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:56:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aeKArH0m6Mo4rXVFyTy9AUUzuJIFj2naN4uj3CDs2RAE45e4wzV1oVd6dzJfJATT+HcjU6KHeesFxXBnaAt3IirMVA7P7irskSbA+EUrIx//EZhOUnF6mzA4aHiDtuRAutti8evlvW6ASmmA/a3TP+IyDBq2ZZO/ls4MQeHVJaM= Received: by 10.70.113.16 with SMTP id l16mr263358wxc.1164355018709; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:56:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.14.20 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:56:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0611232356h12d8f85bwabc785b0e2909e35@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:56:58 +0100 From: "Christian Walther" To: "Mark Jayson Alvarez" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Knowing if someone really stole someone else's code X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:57:00 -0000 Sorry if I sound rude, but did you ever read the BSD license? http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html It says in the first sentence: "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met..." I'd say you can use BSD licensed code for your own projects as long as you provide the copyright message (with is stated below the part I quoted above ;). Which is, by the way, a reason for several producers of WLAN routers to switch from Linux to *BSD: They can alter the source code, compile it, ship their own devices with it, without having to provide the source code. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 08:05:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0D216A412 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C5443D55 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:05:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with ESMTP id TAA20768; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:05:35 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:05:34 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: vittorio In-Reply-To: <20061123205910.48C7C16A599@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW & NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:05:46 -0000 Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 157, Issue 12 Message: 25 vittorio wrote: > Well I tried something similar to your > ipfw add xxx allow udp from ${client} to ${server} ${nfsports} keep-state > ipfw add 300 allow udp from 10.0.0.2 to 10.0.0.1 2049,111,1022 setup > keep-state > (it differs from your line for the setup option). > It ddidn't worked at all. As mentioned earlier, 'setup' only applies to TCP. And I'm not entirely sure that covers all the UDP ports needed, but I can't check right now. > Afterwards, following Cuck's advise, I had a go at modifying the ipfw firewall > in the nfs client 10.0.0.2 (no firewall for the time being on the nfs server > 10.0.0.1) and added towards the end of the list, immediatedly before the very > laste line denying everything else > > 50000 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.0.2 > 51000 allow ip from 10.0.0.2 to 10.0.0.1 > 65535 deny ip from any to any Well that would work, if there are no other blocking rules before those. > It seemed to works.... partially! I mean that I could mount_nfs the share in > the client, surfing the directories, reading and writing files in the share, > BUT ... out of the blue, after some minutes the client freezed and I had to > reboot :-( brutally turning off and on the box. Even in (rare) cases where brutality is required, the reset button is a lot easier on the box. However I doubt your 'freeze' here has anything to do with your firewall rules. We haven't much info to go on so far: Are you using the standard NFS options on both server and client? If not, what options? Are you running rpc.statd and/or rpc.lockd on the server? client? Have you tried using TCP rather than UDP mode? (mount_nfs -T) or interruptible mounts (-i)? Maybe slower, but likely safer. Have you tried running tcpdump on either box to watch the traffic? If you show us what you _are_ trying, we won't have to guess .. Cheers, Ian [Please cc me also, digests often arrive after quite some delay] > Help please > Vittorio > > Alle 05:25, giovedě 23 novembre 2006, Ian Smith ha scritto: > > vittorio wrote: > > > I have two FreeBSD 6.1 boxes one of which (IP 10.0.0.1) is an NFS server > > > and the other one (IP 10.0.0.2) is, among other things, an NFS client > > > sharing directories with the NFS server. > > > It all works correctly and I can mount_nfs all the directories from the > > > server. > > > BUT, I'm now trying to use an IPFW firewall both on the server and on > > > the client. My simple aim is to setup connections between the 10.0.0.1 > > > server and the 10.0.0.2 client ** only **; no connections should be > > > possible with other clients! > > > Now I've tried the poor documentation I could find googling with the > > > keywords "freebsd ipfw nfs" to no avail, I cannot mount_nfs any share on > > > te client because something goes wrong with RPC. > > > Concentrating on the client side (no ipfw for the moment on teh server) > > > I tried the following > > > > > > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 2049,111,1022 to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0 > > > setup keep-state > > > > > > OR > > > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.0.2 2049,111,1022 via fxp0 > > > setup keep-state > > > > > > OR > > > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 2049,111,1022 to me via fxp0 setup > > > keep-state > > > > > > OR > > > ipfw add 300 allow ip from 10.0.0.1 to me 2049,111,1022 via fxp0 setup > > > keep-state > > > > > > If I disable the firewall it all goes smootly. > > > > Firstly, what Chuck and Bill said .. but some further points .. > > > > Secondly, you don't specify port numbers with 'allow ip', which covers > > tcp, udp and raw ip packets also; you want 'allow udp' here, unless of > > course you're using NFS over TCP as well, where you'd need 'allow tcp'. > > Note also that 'setup' only applies to TCP connections. > > > > Thirdly, if you do want to use stateful rules on the client, you'll do > > better doing them on your _outbound_ connections, something like: > > > > ipfw add xxx allow udp from ${client} to ${server} ${nfsports} keep-state > > > > If it were me I'd concentrate on the server side firewall rules (and > > /etc/exports allowed hosts) both for allowing desired and disallowing > > undesired connections, so not having to worry much about what client/s > > may or may not be doing. > > > > 'man ipfw' is actually pretty good documentation, though there is a fair > > bit to absorb there. I still read it before bedtime now and again :) > > > > Ciao, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 08:09:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D9316A412 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=ECVH/Sq0=FE=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from mail.asarian-host.net (mail.asarian-host.net [194.109.160.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C1343D64 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SRS0=ECVH/Sq0=FE=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from anonymizer.asarian-host.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.asarian-host.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAO89D4Z016273 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:09:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; h=from:received-spf:message-id:date:x-authenticated-sender:subject:x-trace:organization:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mimeole; c=nofws; s=anon; d=asarian-host.net; b=lzc6Q79D215T5xrlf7R46uuxwwqFAzJdxcf3qzC4X0bBT2rotbchawGZLXwXVsuw4hOc6aD063xkenw2DY+fj0DSbiPy1Sm0SYbRbF14jxo0E0XgL1cQcht1/dalLiouaxov03Er0HrSoy0ATTqzloeKrQM5ovpqxjkcEvMAIMg= From: Mark Received-SPF: pass (asarian-host.net: 127.0.0.1 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) receiver=anonymizer.asarian-host.net; client-ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=; helo=clientrunner.asarian-host.net; Message-Id: <200611240809.kAO89Cki016265@asarian-host.net> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:09:13 GMT X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net X-Trace: phzbn+fJy8Jv3yHvJWysgrL7o7KYBi4Igk5j6KBBs0NA0mbUOjwMSJv35lm1SHJy X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers, otherwise we are unable to process your complaint X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on asarian-host.net Organization: Asarian-host To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Subject: GCC upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:09:21 -0000 Hello, I'd like tp upgrade my gcc version (from 2.95.4). I have two questions about it, though. 1) What is the best gcc version to upgrade to? I see plenty in the ports, from the whole 3.x series to 4.3. And I wonder why they all still remain in the ports? So I'm not sure upgrading to 4.3 is the best idea. And even when I upgraded to what I thought was the latest gcc (on a Vmware box), it said: "gcc version 4.1.2 20061103 (prerelease)" Bummer. 2): To get ports to actually use the new one, I did something like: asarian-host: {root} % cd /usr/bin asarian-host: {root} % rm gcc asarian-host: {root} % ln /usr/local/bin/gcc41 gcc But there's plenty of 'old' gcc stuff still in /usr/bin/. Will what I did suffice? Or am I missing some sort of procedure to get rid of the gcc environment in /usr/bin/? Subsidiarily, will I run into conflicts this way? (with old gcc stuff still residing in /usr/bin/). I tested the new gcc, btw (compiled MySQL server with it, which takes quite a while). Seems to work fine. But I'm not enough of a C expert to know precisely how to do a safe upgrade of this kind. Thanks, - Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 09:01:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E15216A407 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F8E43D8C for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:00:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id kAO91IZH044229 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:01:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id kAO91IJZ044228 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:01:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA02776; Fri, 24 Nov 06 00:54:05 PST Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:53:54 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4566b322./iYxBMPvlyC5aoZQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <14989d6e0611232356h12d8f85bwabc785b0e2909e35@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <14989d6e0611232356h12d8f85bwabc785b0e2909e35@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Knowing if someone really stole someone else's code X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:01:30 -0000 "Christian Walther" wrote: > Sorry if I sound rude, but did you ever read the BSD license? > http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html > > It says in the first sentence: > "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are > met..." > > I'd say you can use BSD licensed code for your own projects as long as > you provide the copyright message ... Actually, the O.P. raises a legitimate concern. Yes, the conditions for use of BSD-licensed code are very liberal; but this is beside his point. Suppose Alice *claims* that John used her *proprietary* code in his product, and John counters that he used someone else's BSD-licensed code? How is that sort of claim to be dealt with? The matter is more than hypothetical: I seem to recall some legal wrangling between IBM and SCO over SCO's allegation that IBM wrongly released SCO-proprietary code under the GPL. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 10:55:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1610216A407 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from ns2.wananchi.com (ns2.wananchi.com [62.8.64.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A19C43D70 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:55:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from wash by ns2.wananchi.com with local (Exim 4.63 #0 (FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE)) id 1GnYiW-000DIR-Jf by authid for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:55:36 +0300 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:55:36 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061124105536.GI67531@ns2.wananchi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this message, where not explicitly attributed otherwise, are mine alone!. X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Designation: Systems Administrator, Wananchi Online Ltd. X-Location: Nairobi, KE, East Africa. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: 4.x binaries on 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:55:46 -0000 How do I run binaries compiled in FreeBSD 4.11 on a box running 6.2-PRE? -Wash http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html DISCLAIMER: See http://www.wananchi.com/bms/terms.php -- +======================================================================+ |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 +======================================================================+ "I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did. I said I didn't know." -- Mark Twain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 11:00:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3981416A4FD for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (claire.ber.rewt.org.uk [217.160.200.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD90043D82 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:59:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96985C26; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:00:25 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at claire.ber.rewt.org.uk Received: from claire.ber.rewt.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (claire.ber.rewt.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fzB-SXFuU8xN; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:00:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [62.84.172.67] (dsl172-67.as6911.net [62.84.172.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165785C25; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:00:22 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4566D0C3.5080203@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:00:19 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061124105536.GI67531@ns2.wananchi.com> In-Reply-To: <20061124105536.GI67531@ns2.wananchi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: 4.x binaries on 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joe@joeholden.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:00:29 -0000 Odhiambo Washington wrote: > How do I run binaries compiled in FreeBSD 4.11 on a box running 6.2-PRE? Make sure the compat for FreeBSD 4.x is in your kernel (present in GENERIC), and also install the port misc/compat4x, that should do it. Thanks, J From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 11:44:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D543216A403 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D7643D49 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:43:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so767381wxc for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 03:44:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VbqU0aIgeL9rZKUs2qXTYL6Mf/PYAx64FVfMTrTi0weBxdUvdx+Cgjk1JLKEcuTYnPRfyxkMWO0E0vWFmQqwyVtvAwsXn7KWS5Nh/RhKkT4FbxYMPkjrEEhiciLF6cyO9Wejbxy3Hfi0cGEYOcniqimMD6lXH+3nQS5J8AsBoYY= Received: by 10.70.99.9 with SMTP id w9mr619037wxb.1164368653735; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 03:44:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.14.20 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 03:44:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0611240344k3765e483iec8d01c5fafd6626@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:44:13 +0100 From: "Christian Walther" To: "perryh@pluto.rain.com" In-Reply-To: <4566b322./iYxBMPvlyC5aoZQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <14989d6e0611232356h12d8f85bwabc785b0e2909e35@mail.gmail.com> <4566b322./iYxBMPvlyC5aoZQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Knowing if someone really stole someone else's code X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:44:15 -0000 Okay, sorry for the misunderstanding. I got the point now. Are there any lawyers on this list? ;-) I don't know if there is a good answer in general to these questions. I remember that there have been several law suits and allegations against several software developers in the past. These where mainly about companies violating the GPL (e.g. using open source code in their own products without giving credits). AFAIK during the trial discussiona where held if the accused used techniques like reverse engineering to get a usable source code. During the trial, the binary code might be analysed and compared between both products in question. The use of a decompiler might even produce source code that can be compared with the code in question, to figure out if they are identical enough to be from one source. To answer your questions: Yes, I'm pretty sure that the court would ask you to show your own source code. Showing the "wrong" source is in my opinion not an option, because different source generates different binary code, so it'll be pretty obvious. So nobody will do a benchmark, but "experts" will look at the code you provided, and probably figure if it's the wrong one or even where it comes from. Generally, source code will generate the corresponding binary code, so if in doubt, you can compile it, and compare it with the binary code in question. Maybe you'll find some interesting bits on http://gpl-violations.org Yes, its focus is on the GPL, but the people behind this website (and a variety of law suits) use reverse engineering and decompilation to figure out if the GPL has been violated. To make matters worse I think it makes a difference where the claim has been made/the law suit has been filed. HTH Christian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 12:11:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2009C16A4C9 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DB943D79 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:10:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from db2.internal (db2.internal [10.202.2.12]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CDF4718D for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:11:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by db2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:11:37 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: T8O21/wIT7PqctXzevOTjACFnWK6zzko+XdcRMBAP3LL 1164370297 Received: from gumby.localdomain (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AD41207 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:11:35 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:11:29 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061123082520.af5d4265.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20061124163754.5a11ddef@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20061124163754.5a11ddef@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200611241211.31476.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:11:46 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 05:37, Norberto Meijome wrote: > Precisely - MS makes a very strong (and valid) point of saying that once > 'the bad guys' have physical access to your box, the machine is owned. > > The was a (very cool) presentation in Ruxcon (ruxcon.org) this year about > hacking into someone's machine via Firewire. And even if it was an exploit, > neither the researcher/hacker nor MS would consider it "security issue", > because to use this FW attack you need physical access... ie, you've lost > the battle already, it's just a matter of picking your method of breaking > in. I think that's a bit complacent of MS, given that most instances of their OS don't run on servers. If a desktop machine has encrypted partitions, it is protected against someone stealing it and breaking in at their convenience. Reading data from a running machine, shouldn't be as convenient and inconspicuous as plugging-in a cable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 12:45:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEC716A407 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net (pih-relay05.plus.net [212.159.14.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F9B43D53 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:45:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=CPC) by pih-relay05.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1GnaRG-0003wG-Br for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:45:54 +0000 Message-ID: <000901c70fc6$8641d0f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> From: "Graham Bentley" To: References: <20061124120100.334D516A670@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:46:12 -0000 Organization: Custom PC North West MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Subject: Working at Console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Graham Bentley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:45:57 -0000 Hi All, I am interested in setting up a text based / console system. So far I have learnt how to recompile the kernel and get 1024x768 console. I have 'mc' loaded because I am familiar with that. And of course sendmail is already sending mail. Then there is elinks for web ... What other apps are people using / recommend for other tasks on this type of system for ; Email (mutt, pine, other?) Word Processing Music CD MP3 CD Writing Screen ? and any other usefull programs that replace their X equivs ? Thanks ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 12:59:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B67D16A40F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heroh@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF1FE43D58 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:58:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heroh@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2006 12:59:32 -0000 Received: from e178220048.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO trabant.home) [85.178.220.48] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 24 Nov 2006 13:59:32 +0100 X-Authenticated: #31543762 From: Helge Rohde To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Graham Bentley Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:59:02 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061124120100.334D516A670@hub.freebsd.org> <000901c70fc6$8641d0f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> In-Reply-To: <000901c70fc6$8641d0f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611241259.03351.heroh@gmx.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: Working at Console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:59:34 -0000 Hi Graham you might want to check out audio/mp3blaster, very mature and powerful. http://www.freshports.org/audio/mp3blaster/ regards, Helge From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 13:34:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E2F16A416 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:34:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2063743D6B for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:33:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so794727wxc for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:34:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S1K5kEOQ/qgf9LFdSN2rpHpqyjdZTdSOEHH2DJkBjQFlveaJr4MTVDxYHyyWIZui8GIfzi0YcGsnu81+q5Mld0ZSNF9NuSnzIqp+953ygo+eKRfTrel30xLsaEk3mzmzcys878j9Qfy8fEEqAXSqpSN+JQE5+FAKuYIH7hKB2XE= Received: by 10.70.92.12 with SMTP id p12mr19010562wxb.1164375277804; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:34:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.14.20 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:34:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0611240534p5a5258bau7b698d549e82ee0d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:34:37 +0100 From: "Christian Walther" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200611241259.03351.heroh@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061124120100.334D516A670@hub.freebsd.org> <000901c70fc6$8641d0f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> <200611241259.03351.heroh@gmx.de> Subject: Re: Working at Console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:34:39 -0000 Hi, I like cmus for playing mp3s on the console. It has an album view and an integrated library, so its feature set has many things in common with the "big" X11 music players. To play CDs from the command line, there is a tool named "cdplay" available. I prefer mutt for mail. For text processing, I like to use TeX, but you have to learn its syntax. There are extensions available for Emacs and vim (syntax highlighting). Regards, Christian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 15:14:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4555D16A403 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:14:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from soohyunc@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A8043D55 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soohyunc@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so642391uge for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:14:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=bw8Lz/eMCKH4yRjq0oqDQ6QNY7qLTAs7rBBUnhWpWuQwMTzhl7MXR0o2Kcn7C64SkSLPogrwAPRSvz8zoAG+0AGm2F6gvXC3QJmHz24aT4U08NCfF48u01+M9syvkyhHYnQHWs4zuyAA+8+ZH9nxfyIOVwPWoPFB0WyUe9oRSpQ= Received: by 10.78.157.8 with SMTP id f8mr10341693hue.1164381248021; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:14:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.131.19 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:14:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:14:07 +0000 From: "Soo-Hyun Choi" Sender: soohyunc@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 287556be5fff84dc Subject: 'seq' at a BSD-like OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:14:10 -0000 Hi, If I'm at a Linux machine, I can use 'seq'. (Okay, everyone knows it.) But when I'm at a BSD-like OS, I can't find 'seq' from the coreutils. Does anybody know how I install it over FreeBSD or Mac OS X? Thanks, Soo-Hyun From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 15:18:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F0116A40F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:18:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0040843D77 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:17:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd3mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr6so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.21]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J980059FQIEBRC0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:18:14 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.151]) by pd3mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J98004E4QIEES22@pd3mr6so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:18:14 -0700 (MST) Received: from hexahedron.daemonology.net ([24.82.18.31]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with SMTP id <0J9800GPTQID43B1@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:18:13 -0700 (MST) Received: (qmail 844 invoked from network); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:18:09 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:18:09 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:18:09 -0800 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: To: Soo-Hyun Choi Message-id: <45670D31.6040909@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 References: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060416) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'seq' at a BSD-like OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:18:54 -0000 Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > If I'm at a Linux machine, I can use 'seq'. (Okay, everyone knows it.) > But when I'm at a BSD-like OS, I can't find 'seq' from the coreutils. The program you're looking for is called "jot". I have no idea why Linux distributions get the name wrong. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 15:26:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C7816A47B for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A020A43D82 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:25:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.139] (helo=anti-virus01-10) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GncwL-0007vj-Ne; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:26:09 +0000 Received: from [82.41.32.108] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GncwL-0004Ob-4U; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:26:09 +0000 Message-ID: <45670F10.9020909@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:26:08 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Soo-Hyun Choi References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'seq' at a BSD-like OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:26:15 -0000 Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > Hi, > > If I'm at a Linux machine, I can use 'seq'. (Okay, everyone knows it.) > But when I'm at a BSD-like OS, I can't find 'seq' from the coreutils. > > Does anybody know how I install it over FreeBSD or Mac OS X? Install the sysutils/coreutils port to get gseq (which you can alias to seq, or make a symlink or whatever you want). Or check out FreeBSD's jot command. > (Okay, everyone knows it.) Personally, I'd never heard of it :-) --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 15:51:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6205416A40F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:51:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [195.115.46.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2548743DC4 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:50:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1822A0D1 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:51:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.4.3 (20060930) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7z2qL5HQt32A for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:50:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.14] (unknown [194.206.55.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE48029C54 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:50:52 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <48A3593C-11B2-4545-B243-C1862C4CF010@todoo.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Liste FreeBSD From: bsd Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:50:37 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Subject: Adaptec AHA 29320 SCSI card running at 160 MB/s instead of 320 MB/s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:51:26 -0000 Hello, We just installed a big HA cluster with an intel dual Xeon and 4GB of =20= memory. Two of these units are connected to a promise Vtrack M210p via an =20 Adaptec AHA 29320 SCSI. Dmesg states that the card is running at 160 MB/s instead of the =20 expected 320 MB/s ?? What could we do to change this and have It working at the proper speed. Sincerly yours. ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 16:11:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3456016A407 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68D843D8F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:10:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986DF1A3C20; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:10:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E1F7B51A00; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:10:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:10:40 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mark Message-ID: <20061124161040.GA51857@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200611240809.kAO89Cki016265@asarian-host.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611240809.kAO89Cki016265@asarian-host.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:11:13 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:09:13AM +0000, Mark wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I'd like tp upgrade my gcc version (from 2.95.4). I have two questions > about it, though. >=20 > 1) What is the best gcc version to upgrade to? I see plenty in the ports, > from the whole 3.x series to 4.3. And I wonder why they all still remain > in the ports? So I'm not sure upgrading to 4.3 is the best idea. And even > when I upgraded to what I thought was the latest gcc (on a Vmware box), it > said: >=20 > "gcc version 4.1.2 20061103 (prerelease)" >=20 > Bummer. >=20 > 2): To get ports to actually use the new one, I did something like: >=20 > asarian-host: {root} % cd /usr/bin > asarian-host: {root} % rm gcc > asarian-host: {root} % ln /usr/local/bin/gcc41 gcc >=20 > But there's plenty of 'old' gcc stuff still in /usr/bin/. >=20 > Will what I did suffice? Or am I missing some sort of procedure to get rid > of the gcc environment in /usr/bin/? Subsidiarily, will I run into > conflicts this way? (with old gcc stuff still residing in /usr/bin/). >=20 > I tested the new gcc, btw (compiled MySQL server with it, which takes > quite a while). Seems to work fine. But I'm not enough of a C expert to > know precisely how to do a safe upgrade of this kind. If you're not an expert then just leave it alone. Replacing the system compiler might sound like a cool thing to do, but what will actually happen is that you'll make your FreeBSD system unbuildable. Kris --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZxmAWry0BWjoQKURAizyAKC0I5crNWJNmmhJh5YPmpmqtcK5SgCgs4aG l3VSoY1iS2AdSY9r5XiCLtc= =UYIO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 16:40:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22FB16A492 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=ECVH/Sq0=FE=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from mail.asarian-host.net (mail.asarian-host.net [194.109.160.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DA743D55 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:39:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SRS0=ECVH/Sq0=FE=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from anonymizer.asarian-host.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.asarian-host.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAOGeNdN031099 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:40:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; h=from:received-spf:message-id:date:x-authenticated-sender:subject:x-trace:organization:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:x-mimeole; c=nofws; s=anon; d=asarian-host.net; b=GqW4kt28qacGyJS+jm8/zfmENUo8mOrf04oxhOWbxy7HtiqRYAeqSTUP4ImmBRhf2EPMfnVOVWUbhkrrQP9FtiQYUeUA44MNwdY2BCKnbddNMXxHBfhn1Z0guC/vR0OLN74KZ9vPrHls/MtGrW6JKvXTasvh/RcC7hqVEwvRbis= From: Mark Received-SPF: pass (asarian-host.net: 127.0.0.1 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) receiver=anonymizer.asarian-host.net; client-ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=; helo=clientrunner.asarian-host.net; Message-Id: <200611241640.kAOGeLZk031090@asarian-host.net> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:40:23 GMT X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net X-Trace: oNmdlACHsf3TehLwIIVHdmx4oj7a/Ey6TVHX4gJnDJxSpqTV32k704dnHV2oy7vA X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers, otherwise we are unable to process your complaint X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on asarian-host.net Organization: Asarian-host To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20061124161040.GA51857@xor.obsecurity.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Subject: RE: GCC upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:40:26 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:kris@obsecurity.org] > Sent: vrijdag 24 november 2006 17:11 > To: Mark > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: GCC upgrade > > > I tested the new gcc, btw (compiled MySQL server with > > it, which takes quite a while). Seems to work fine. > > But I'm not enough of a C expert to know precisely how > > to do a safe upgrade of this kind. > > If you're not an expert then just leave it alone. Replacing > the system compiler might sound like a cool thing to do, but > what will actually happen is that you'll make your FreeBSD > system unbuildable. Guess I hadn't thought about it that way. Good thinking. It's just that 2.95.4 seems so ancient. :) Only reason I wanted to in the first place, is that I've had several ports that wanted a 3.x series gcc (and kept wanting to build one). Thanks, - Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 16:56:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046BB16A407 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A9E43D46 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:55:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812271A3C20; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:56:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF4B5512E4; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:56:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:56:10 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mark Message-ID: <20061124165610.GB97779@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061124161040.GA51857@xor.obsecurity.org> <200611241640.kAOGeLZk031090@asarian-host.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611241640.kAOGeLZk031090@asarian-host.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:56:27 -0000 --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:40:23PM +0000, Mark wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:kris@obsecurity.org]=20 > > Sent: vrijdag 24 november 2006 17:11 > > To: Mark > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: GCC upgrade > >=20 > > > I tested the new gcc, btw (compiled MySQL server with > > > it, which takes quite a while). Seems to work fine. > > > But I'm not enough of a C expert to know precisely how > > > to do a safe upgrade of this kind. > >=20 > > If you're not an expert then just leave it alone. Replacing > > the system compiler might sound like a cool thing to do, but > > what will actually happen is that you'll make your FreeBSD > > system unbuildable. >=20 > Guess I hadn't thought about it that way. Good thinking. > It's just that 2.95.4 seems so ancient. :) >=20 > Only reason I wanted to in the first place, is that I've had several > ports that wanted a 3.x series gcc (and kept wanting to build one). If you're interested in running gcc 3.x, you can just update to a modern version of FreeBSD (e.g. 6.x). You really should consider doing this on general grounds, since the 4.x branch is scheduled for termination in only a few months (January 2007). Kris --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZyQqWry0BWjoQKURAg2pAJ9LXSY8/OWop66I5EKMZm4qN+RNCwCeP+/m KjY4ME+UbQF+NSxwljJPt5Q= =uu/U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 16:58:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EAC16A504 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heroh@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DB1D43D91 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:58:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heroh@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2006 16:58:43 -0000 Received: from e178220048.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO trabant.home) [85.178.220.48] by mail.gmx.net (mp042) with SMTP; 24 Nov 2006 17:58:43 +0100 X-Authenticated: #31543762 From: Helge Rohde To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:58:13 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200611241640.kAOGeLZk031090@asarian-host.net> In-Reply-To: <200611241640.kAOGeLZk031090@asarian-host.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611241658.13447.heroh@gmx.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: GCC upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:58:46 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 16:40, Mark wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:kris@obsecurity.org] > > Sent: vrijdag 24 november 2006 17:11 > > To: Mark > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: GCC upgrade > > > > > I tested the new gcc, btw (compiled MySQL server with > > > it, which takes quite a while). Seems to work fine. > > > But I'm not enough of a C expert to know precisely how > > > to do a safe upgrade of this kind. > > > > If you're not an expert then just leave it alone. Replacing > > the system compiler might sound like a cool thing to do, but > > what will actually happen is that you'll make your FreeBSD > > system unbuildable. > > Guess I hadn't thought about it that way. Good thinking. > It's just that 2.95.4 seems so ancient. :) > > Only reason I wanted to in the first place, is that I've had several > ports that wanted a 3.x series gcc (and kept wanting to build one). > > Thanks, You could leave the default in place, define a different gcc for the ports in /etc/make.conf and then just add to the list of excludes every time you run into problems while building a port. Thats what i do, and so far roughly 80% of the ports seem quite content with gcc4.2 If that sounds cool to you, checkout this sample make.conf out of some german Howto. You wont need knowledge of german, Its self explaining enough. http://wiki.bsdforen.de/index.php/Make.conf_optimieren#.2Fetc.2Fmake.conf have fun, Helge From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 17:02:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 10E0716A4CA; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20061124170201.10E0716A4CA@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:02:01 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 17:02:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 174F816A4D0; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20061124170201.174F816A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Note also that the book has now been released for free download in PDF form. Instead of downloading the changed pages, you may prefer to download the entire book. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ for more information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm no longer constantly updating it, but I may be able to help Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 17:47:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A4C16A417 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from soohyunc@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CF543D58 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:47:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soohyunc@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so688699uge for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:47:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=rqBnjSGy0/sFviDaIdeAc0jd4bUWqY/wZyxWuc6Gr8ChMCvd0ZB57YR/LFavtZf8QkQXO/SX99IqEFPbQ/hkjhbHfYhdpYMfNHFdCUGQofUTZKyuxferUMmdq4JFMmEh7V0tIqxbzHsYYrgPggxUW67bPDbB1FXwfdOvmcOYUCE= Received: by 10.78.200.3 with SMTP id x3mr10502506huf.1164390464756; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:47:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.131.19 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:47:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:47:44 +0000 From: "Soo-Hyun Choi" Sender: soohyunc@gmail.com To: "Colin Percival" In-Reply-To: <45670D31.6040909@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45670D31.6040909@freebsd.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3a5346fa73b7b2ed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'seq' at a BSD-like OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:47:47 -0000 Hi, 'gseq' solved in my case. 'jot' also works similar to 'seq' but not quite same in terms of usage. Thanks for your reply. Soo-Hyun On 11/24/06, Colin Percival wrote: > Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > > If I'm at a Linux machine, I can use 'seq'. (Okay, everyone knows it.) > > But when I'm at a BSD-like OS, I can't find 'seq' from the coreutils. > > The program you're looking for is called "jot". I have no idea why Linux > distributions get the name wrong. > > Colin Percival > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 19:39:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4546516A47B for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1164829184.7896cd@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4EE43D73 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:39:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1164829184.7896cd@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAOJdi5K005999 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:39:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1164829184.7896cd@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kAOJdiS5005998 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:39:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1164829184.7896cd@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1164829184.7896cd@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:39:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:39:44 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061124193944.GA4950@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) From: David Banning Cc: Subject: question on virtusertable - sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:39:56 -0000 I have several times where I have no user setup in virtusertable but the mail is still delivered to the user. If I delete the user then the mail bounces - I want to keep the user and still have the mail bounce - how would I do that? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 19:55:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB67E16A412 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C8B43D5A for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:54:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (cpe-024-163-054-055.nc.res.rr.com [24.163.54.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kAOJtWdG096090; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:55:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:55:29 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061124193944.GA4950@skytracker.ca> In-Reply-To: <20061124193944.GA4950@skytracker.ca> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611241455.30008.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: David Banning Subject: Re: question on virtusertable - sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:55:36 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 14:39, David Banning wrote: > I have several times where I have no user setup in virtusertable but > the mail is still delivered to the user. If I delete the user > then the mail bounces - I want to keep the user and still have > the mail bounce - how would I do that? Create a virtusertable entry for each user at the relevant domain you DO want to receive mail, then add a catchall entry: bob@domain.com bob tom@domain.com tom @domain.com bounce You can define "bounce" in /etc/mail/aliases, or just leave it undefined (since it will probably bounce anyway). JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 20:04:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6214D16A403 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1164830658.2933e3@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F322843D75 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:03:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1164830658.2933e3@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAOK4IMj014907 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:04:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1164830658.2933e3@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kAOK4I6K014906 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:04:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1164830658.2933e3@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1164830658.2933e3@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:04:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:04:17 -0500 To: John Nielsen , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061124200417.GA13063@skytracker.ca> References: <20061124193944.GA4950@skytracker.ca> <200611241455.30008.lists@jnielsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611241455.30008.lists@jnielsen.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) From: David Banning Cc: Subject: Re: question on virtusertable - sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:04:26 -0000 > @domain.com bounce > > You can define "bounce" in /etc/mail/aliases, or just leave it undefined > (since it will probably bounce anyway). I am looking at my /etc/mail/aliases how would I define bounce? I know I could simple send it to /dev/null, but I want it to bounce back to the sender with a "no such user" error. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 20:09:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D72816A403; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E41C43D5D; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:08:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (cpe-024-163-054-055.nc.res.rr.com [24.163.54.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kAOK9adG009255; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:09:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:09:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061124193944.GA4950@skytracker.ca> <200611241455.30008.lists@jnielsen.net> <20061124200417.GA13063@skytracker.ca> In-Reply-To: <20061124200417.GA13063@skytracker.ca> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611241509.34184.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: questions@freebsd.org, David Banning Subject: Re: question on virtusertable - sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:09:45 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 15:04, David Banning wrote: > > @domain.com bounce > > > > You can define "bounce" in /etc/mail/aliases, or just leave it > > undefined (since it will probably bounce anyway). > > I am looking at my /etc/mail/aliases > > how would I define bounce? > > I know I could simple send it to /dev/null, but I want it to bounce > back to the sender with a "no such user" error. That should be the behavior you'd get from leaving it undefined. I actually don't know of a straightforward way to do it otherwise (short of using a pipe redirect to another program).. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 20:09:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D72816A403; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E41C43D5D; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:08:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (cpe-024-163-054-055.nc.res.rr.com [24.163.54.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kAOK9adG009255; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:09:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:09:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061124193944.GA4950@skytracker.ca> <200611241455.30008.lists@jnielsen.net> <20061124200417.GA13063@skytracker.ca> In-Reply-To: <20061124200417.GA13063@skytracker.ca> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611241509.34184.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: questions@freebsd.org, David Banning Subject: Re: question on virtusertable - sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:09:45 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 15:04, David Banning wrote: > > @domain.com bounce > > > > You can define "bounce" in /etc/mail/aliases, or just leave it > > undefined (since it will probably bounce anyway). > > I am looking at my /etc/mail/aliases > > how would I define bounce? > > I know I could simple send it to /dev/null, but I want it to bounce > back to the sender with a "no such user" error. That should be the behavior you'd get from leaving it undefined. I actually don't know of a straightforward way to do it otherwise (short of using a pipe redirect to another program).. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 20:19:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C5E16A47C for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:19:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7432B43D6B for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:18:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id kAOKIbxu014078 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:18:41 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAOKIUNi009628; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:18:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kAOKIT57009627; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:18:29 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:18:29 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: David Banning Message-ID: <20061124201828.GA9575@kobe.laptop> References: <20061124193944.GA4950@skytracker.ca> <200611241455.30008.lists@jnielsen.net> <20061124200417.GA13063@skytracker.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061124200417.GA13063@skytracker.ca> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.433, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.77, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: questions@freebsd.org, John Nielsen Subject: Re: question on virtusertable - sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:19:05 -0000 On 2006-11-24 15:04, David Banning wrote: >> @domain.com bounce >> >> You can define "bounce" in /etc/mail/aliases, or just leave it undefined >> (since it will probably bounce anyway). > > I am looking at my /etc/mail/aliases > > how would I define bounce? > > I know I could simple send it to /dev/null, but I want it to bounce > back to the sender with a "no such user" error. How about bouncing from inside `virtusertable' itself? alpha@domain.com alpha beta@domain.com beta @domain.com error:nouser 550 No such user here I think this is the cleanest way to do something like the setup you described, since all the relevant information is kept closely packed together in `virtusertable' itself. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 20:46:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C4E16A40F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:46:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CDC43D6B for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:45:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (cpe-024-163-054-055.nc.res.rr.com [24.163.54.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kAOKkC2R030800; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:46:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:46:08 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061124193944.GA4950@skytracker.ca> <20061124200417.GA13063@skytracker.ca> <20061124201828.GA9575@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20061124201828.GA9575@kobe.laptop> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611241546.09526.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: David Banning Subject: Re: question on virtusertable - sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:46:18 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 15:18, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-11-24 15:04, David Banning wrote: > >> @domain.com bounce > >> > >> You can define "bounce" in /etc/mail/aliases, or just leave it > >> undefined (since it will probably bounce anyway). > > > > I am looking at my /etc/mail/aliases > > > > how would I define bounce? > > > > I know I could simple send it to /dev/null, but I want it to bounce > > back to the sender with a "no such user" error. > > How about bouncing from inside `virtusertable' itself? > > alpha@domain.com alpha > beta@domain.com beta > @domain.com error:nouser 550 No such user here > > I think this is the cleanest way to do something like the setup you > described, since all the relevant information is kept closely packed > together in `virtusertable' itself. I thought there should be a better way than what I described. With this approach you don't necessarily need a catchall entry. Just let the mail flow through for everyone except exceptions listed in virtusertable. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 21:02:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5917B16A40F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF94043D72 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:01:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so558415pyh for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:02:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=A6oNeooNINCjiyrM7Gjt76PF7O6F62v7dI3Yofc8CJstgtdPb8fNZj/+/EvcjsaUgLG/9S9lf5RR7vZYwUngW0IHsZ9u/GY/VCGOEmG3lWTmc9mvmayTRQaeWIxOlXGyBIO6iXhpQZrWxuMlutgQDYsmtjJBY/oZMdu+tcnxglw= Received: by 10.35.82.16 with SMTP id j16mr6666660pyl.1164402147451; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:02:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:02:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611241302q77bf1d6etd59c7624562a65fe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:02:27 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: How 2 Configure Makefile before "make install clean" from the ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:02:37 -0000 Hi I want to install apache20 from the ports. But before installing, I want to enable/disable some of the modules as follow ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/local/apache2 \ --with-mpm=prefork \ --disable-charset-lite \ --disable-include \ --disable-env \ --disable-setenvif \ --disable-status \ --disable-autoindex \ --disable-asis \ --disable-cgi \ --disable-negotiation \ --disable-imap \ --disable-actions \ --disable-userdir \ --disable-alias \ But I have tried many different ways to configure before giving command "make install clean". But haven't had any luck. Could you please guide me that How can I configure the Makefile before installing apache? For example When I give "make config" command I get error as follow: # make config ===> No options to configure I have also tried --enable-OPTION and --disable-OPTION... in Makefile. but didn't had any luck.... :( Could you attache a Makefile showing places where to put these switches and how? I will be really very gratefull.... -- Thanks! BR / vj -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 21:07:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231BB16A47C for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F80343D58 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:05:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so558927pyh for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:06:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=olxOBt+qgq7C+bqHxh2A2NCopwZiyJuPThVhseTnaEVhFdHmBNEBc9M+bARL0NfuC4bXhNq/h44LlsPw1ZU9Xyon7Rk7muQ7qhPEAAthSxVAi0AbXxpT3E/BivqAZI3gC8EFFcKpmtKKnNrv6IatcDvg+9xJ2xT+r2X5qVA495A= Received: by 10.35.93.1 with SMTP id v1mr6678239pyl.1164402390911; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:06:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:06:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611241306t57325db4t11690f1aa856f738@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:06:30 +0100 From: VeeJay To: RW In-Reply-To: <200611241211.31476.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611211941iae07787q3f433fb2c8ab1f22@mail.gmail.com> <20061123082520.af5d4265.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20061124163754.5a11ddef@localhost> <200611241211.31476.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Password Security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:07:04 -0000 On 11/24/06, RW wrote: > > On Friday 24 November 2006 05:37, Norberto Meijome wrote: > > Precisely - MS makes a very strong (and valid) point of saying that once > > 'the bad guys' have physical access to your box, the machine is owned. > > > > The was a (very cool) presentation in Ruxcon (ruxcon.org) this year > about > > hacking into someone's machine via Firewire. And even if it was an > exploit, > > neither the researcher/hacker nor MS would consider it "security issue", > > because to use this FW attack you need physical access... ie, you've > lost > > the battle already, it's just a matter of picking your method of > breaking > > in. > > I think that's a bit complacent of MS, given that most instances of their > OS > don't run on servers. > > If a desktop machine has encrypted partitions, it is protected against > someone > stealing it and breaking in at their convenience. Reading data from a > running > machine, shouldn't be as convenient and inconspicuous as plugging-in a > cable. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > But what about database encryption? Is it possible to encrypt mySQL database and what is the best method to encrypt which does not affect the performance? -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 21:07:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3439916A47C for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5B243D97 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:06:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139729A96BA; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:06:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EzE4rYdG9tmx; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:06:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (catv-50635cb6.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.92.182]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62B59A9684; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:06:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45675EE1.9010101@t-hosting.hu> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:06:41 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0611241302q77bf1d6etd59c7624562a65fe@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611241302q77bf1d6etd59c7624562a65fe@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How 2 Configure Makefile before "make install clean" from the ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:07:08 -0000 VeeJay escribió: > Hi > > > > I want to install apache20 from the ports. But before installing, I > want to > enable/disable some of the modules as follow > > > > ./configure \ > > --prefix=/usr/local/apache2 \ > > --with-mpm=prefork \ > > --disable-charset-lite \ > > --disable-include \ > > --disable-env \ > > --disable-setenvif \ > > --disable-status \ > > --disable-autoindex \ > > --disable-asis \ > > --disable-cgi \ > > --disable-negotiation \ > > --disable-imap \ > > --disable-actions \ > > --disable-userdir \ > > --disable-alias \ > > > > But I have tried many different ways to configure before giving > command "make install clean". But haven't had any luck. > > Could you please guide me that How can I configure the Makefile before > installing apache? > > For example > > When I give "make config" command I get error as follow: > > > > # make config > ===> No options to configure > > > > > > I have also tried --enable-OPTION and --disable-OPTION... in Makefile. > > > but didn't had any luck.... :( > > Could you attache a Makefile showing places where to put these > switches and > how? I will be really very gratefull.... > When you try to install it, it prints a bunch of knobs, you can use, e.g. WITH_SSL_MODULES, etc. You can set such in this way: make WITH_SSL_MODULES=yes install clean Cheers, Gabor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 21:10:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A07116A403 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945C843D5A for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:10:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id kAOLAFlx017221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:10:17 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAOLA9SM010838; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:10:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kAOLA8VT010836; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:10:08 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:10:08 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: VeeJay Message-ID: <20061124211007.GA9116@kobe.laptop> References: <2cd0a0da0611241302q77bf1d6etd59c7624562a65fe@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611241302q77bf1d6etd59c7624562a65fe@mail.gmail.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.433, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.77, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How 2 Configure Makefile before "make install clean" from the ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:10:45 -0000 On 2006-11-24 22:02, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > I want to install apache20 from the ports. But before installing, I > want to enable/disable some of the modules as follow > > ./configure \ > --prefix=/usr/local/apache2 \ > --with-mpm=prefork \ > --disable-charset-lite \ > --disable-include \ > --disable-env \ > --disable-setenvif \ > --disable-status \ > --disable-autoindex \ > --disable-asis \ > --disable-cgi \ > --disable-negotiation \ > --disable-imap \ > --disable-actions \ > --disable-userdir \ > --disable-alias \ Try running: # make show-options inside the apache20 port directory, and read *carefully* the output :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 21:12:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A39F16A417 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B46B943D6A for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:11:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2006 21:12:12 -0000 Received: from p54A7F324.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.0.12]) [84.167.243.36] by mail.gmx.net (mp042) with SMTP; 24 Nov 2006 22:12:12 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5465401 Message-ID: <45676076.4020104@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:13:26 +0100 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Organization: Lords of Nightmare User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: PRs dead X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:12:16 -0000 Since the move to the new servers my followups disappear in an unknown black home. Others told me that the same happens to the PRs they try to send. I understand that unexpected things happen, but this is basic infrastructure that doesn't work for some time, now. What's going on here? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 21:19:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CA416A47B for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4179C43D67 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:18:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1275848nfc for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:19:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ZKZcsJoHk8ZQ9NHMys8Iyx5RKFGDSoANEjgUaZvxKJ8nDPIh3ooJU6IPAotsFT081QS6YFFABSM6q8mqOq2TckKH7ciExdzYQP4DkwkX22ubet7EU7yfTflFDgiioLOY9hvqTM3qSpPY91ZyZ8mW4LlFvbFGJzIHrYVgGQDLlIg= Received: by 10.82.114.3 with SMTP id m3mr1646456buc.1164403145538; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:19:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.163.16 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:19:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8cb6106e0611241319pf1910ees5c9efe28ab61dab1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:19:05 -0800 From: "Josh Carroll" Sender: josh.carroll@gmail.com To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" In-Reply-To: <45676076.4020104@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45676076.4020104@gmx.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0b6a79a9e5cd2036 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PRs dead X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:19:16 -0000 > Since the move to the new servers my followups disappear in an unknown black home. Well that explains why the reply to my PR isn't showing up in the PR history on the tracking web page. I guess it could be delayed, but it was sent a couple hours ago. Josh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 22:26:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A7216A407 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AEA43D8C for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:25:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1291145nfc for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:25:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=VrGC/9Ciz+8ZALpZ60uhZdgHJwK7TAPb+WjxsmoYl3i/MnUBVX+3rDdOwuRNmb3BBOr7ZPU6QSmPXRHlmE4z+IjDVIxvXYmNCI2igSCNRu6mxZvCbcxqsnpV3cKLbRNflle0Uq/M6d/WfgGSbVIKJ3/aeRZniPWKDoBwCWwmeUI= Received: by 10.78.51.9 with SMTP id y9mr10714554huy.1164407145709; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:25:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:25:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 01:25:45 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 738940856797c7e0 Cc: Subject: Local checkout performance - cvs vs cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:26:20 -0000 I use cvsup to maintain a full local copy of the CVS repo. I then use plain cvs to check out different branches of src from it. The problem is while cvsup only takes a minute each time I run it, cvs takes several times more. I run cvsup with "-gs" and cvs with "-rR" flags. Should I run a local cvsupd server or is there another way to speed things up? I only need the repo and the branches in read-only mode. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 22:35:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B713F16A407 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524C043D78 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:34:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so918069wxc for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:34:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.7.4 with SMTP id 4mr3705362wxg.1164407698813; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:34:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i16sm18789071wxd.2006.11.24.14.34.58; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:34:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FE4BCC5; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:34:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14080BBC6; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:34:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:34:48 -0500 (EST) From: Gerard Seibert To: FreeBSD-Questions In-Reply-To: <45675EE1.9010101@t-hosting.hu> Message-ID: <20061124172714.D73335@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <2cd0a0da0611241302q77bf1d6etd59c7624562a65fe@mail.gmail.com> <45675EE1.9010101@t-hosting.hu> Organization: Seibercom.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1083641393-1164407688=:73335" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= , VeeJay Subject: Re: How 2 Configure Makefile before "make install clean" from the ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gerard Seibert List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:35:43 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1083641393-1164407688=:73335 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > VeeJay escribió: >> Hi >> >> >> >> I want to install apache20 from the ports. But before installing, I want to >> enable/disable some of the modules as follow >> >> >> >> ./configure \ >> >> --prefix=/usr/local/apache2 \ >> >> --with-mpm=prefork \ >> >> --disable-charset-lite \ >> >> --disable-include \ >> >> --disable-env \ >> >> --disable-setenvif \ >> >> --disable-status \ >> >> --disable-autoindex \ >> >> --disable-asis \ >> >> --disable-cgi \ >> >> --disable-negotiation \ >> >> --disable-imap \ >> >> --disable-actions \ >> >> --disable-userdir \ >> >> --disable-alias \ >> >> >> >> But I have tried many different ways to configure before giving >> command "make install clean". But haven't had any luck. >> >> Could you please guide me that How can I configure the Makefile before >> installing apache? >> >> For example >> >> When I give "make config" command I get error as follow: >> >> >> >> # make config >> ===> No options to configure >> >> >> >> >> >> I have also tried --enable-OPTION and --disable-OPTION... in Makefile. >> >> >> but didn't had any luck.... :( >> >> Could you attache a Makefile showing places where to put these switches and >> how? I will be really very gratefull.... >> > When you try to install it, it prints a bunch of knobs, you can use, e.g. > WITH_SSL_MODULES, etc. You can set such in this way: > make WITH_SSL_MODULES=yes install clean I think the easiest method is to determine exactly what knobs you want to employ, then place them in the /etc/make.conf file. /etc/make.conf # Apache 2.2.2. section .if $(.CURDIR:M*/www/apache22) WITH_DBM=bdb WITH_BERKELEYDB=db42 .endif Obviously, you enter the knobs you want to use. An advantage to this method is that should you update Apache at some point, these knobs will be used by the newer version. -- Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Mike: "The Fourth Dimension is a shambles?" Bernie: "Nobody ever empties the ashtrays. People are SO inconsiderate." Gary Trudeau, "Doonesbury" --0-1083641393-1164407688=:73335-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 22:40:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B45416A407; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EB243D5D; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113961A3C1E; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:40:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9708151314; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:40:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:40:40 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andrew Pantyukhin Message-ID: <20061124224040.GA4125@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Local checkout performance - cvs vs cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:40:56 -0000 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:25:45AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > I use cvsup to maintain a full local copy of the CVS > repo. I then use plain cvs to check out different branches > of src from it. The problem is while cvsup only takes a > minute each time I run it, cvs takes several times more. >=20 > I run cvsup with "-gs" and cvs with "-rR" flags. Should > I run a local cvsupd server or is there another way to > speed things up? I only need the repo and the branches > in read-only mode. I guess cvs is slower because it needs to check for local diffs before/while merging in changes. By contrast cvsup will just blow away any changes you have made. There's probably not much you can do apart from not checking out full trees unless you really need them. Kris --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZ3ToWry0BWjoQKURAjU4AKC9BmpaCeRmgAUzec0/pJXH9v8otQCeLZMx g+sve4j0Yehk+3uInkmjgWA= =FKiM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 23:05:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9EA16A403 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:05:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388ED43D9F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:05:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 31589 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2006 10:05:42 +1100 Received: from 210-84-60-125.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (210.84.60.125) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 25 Nov 2006 10:05:42 +1100 Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:05:37 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: custompc@custompc.plus.com Message-ID: <20061125100537.361f4a30@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: > Subject: Re: Ezmlm Port Okay Or Junk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:05:51 -0000 On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:34:10 +0000 Graham Bentley wrote: Graham, please include the list in the reply - it doesn't help anyone else to have a private chat :) > I didnt keep a list but mplayers extra codecs spring to mind. hmmm my mplayer and mplayer-skin s having a nit with some skin it cant find (it may be that I chose a bunch of skins to include as an option...will clean completely and retry soon). win32-codecs has security holes, but if you dont care about this, it should install fine. > > Any one wanting any kind of multimedia desktop would want those. > > I thought the ports where kept up to date? I am pretty sure they are - i upgrade about 2 or 3 avg / day on my laptop. > > Seems alot are kept for 'history' sake if it really is a big problem for you, please consider submitting a PR with fixes for specific issues you've found. Or report them via PR at least (as nobody will fix something that is not known to be broken). good luck, _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." Richard Feynman I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 23:16:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E805016A40F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791F443D46 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:16:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from kanga.digitaltorque.ca (hs-216-106-102-70.storm.ca [216.106.102.70]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAONGgAX010832 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:16:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (tigger.digitaltorque.ca [192.168.1.3]) by kanga.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F414D58 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:16:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7DD240E2 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:16:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45677D45.3010606@digitaltorque.ca> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:16:21 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig96F06F2FC19A57CF41011647" Subject: make config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:16:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig96F06F2FC19A57CF41011647 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, When I type "make config" for a port and set some options, where are they stored? Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --------------enig96F06F2FC19A57CF41011647 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFZ31MKGqCc1vIvggRAlG2AJsEvYGLJOry0rtutVCpKL7n4m2HOACfU8tk DGyChuj4t50g73W7ksNHFWA= =noK9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig96F06F2FC19A57CF41011647-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 23:23:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F59416A412 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from mx.inode.at (lb01nat07.inode.at [62.99.145.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9EC43D55 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:22:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from [85.124.25.44] (port=8456 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smartmx-07.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GnkO1-0004J1-Vu; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:23:14 +0100 Message-ID: <45677EDF.5030409@inode.at> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:23:11 +0100 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael P. Soulier" References: <45677D45.3010606@digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <45677D45.3010606@digitaltorque.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:23:15 -0000 Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Hello, > > When I type "make config" for a port and set some options, where are > they stored? /var/db/ports//options -- Armin Pirkovitsch a.pirko@inode.at From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 23:23:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4283F16A4CA for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:23:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7418943D58 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:22:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GnkOE-0001G7-Kd for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:23:26 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAONQVZS069929 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:26:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kAONQVqY069928 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:26:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:26:31 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <45677D45.3010606@digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <45677D45.3010606@digitaltorque.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611241726.31333.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79813425e08be91234af5a5abcfef7ec07350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: make config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:23:28 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 17:16, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Hello, > > When I type "make config" for a port and set some options, where are > they stored? > > Thanks, > Mike Mike, Check out /var/db//options lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 23:41:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11F616A40F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from probsdorg@yahoo.com) Received: from web52409.mail.yahoo.com (web52409.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 493CA43D46 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:40:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from probsdorg@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 5591 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Nov 2006 23:41:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wp3Il2ee/8+w+yH48rgzcnBGGeWI5uacJ3GRyA5fAnfI187OOxpvXUNbzNWmeLxa3KdIOMoVUr/N7kOm1ADuo2w92O8qCgzUegRt23XFJzgbWo8aY/UJuAKpCuL2xLy0+cwW+GWTZnwO+WtTtRG6SSs+MBG5nV2/JRce0Zrmjw0= ; Message-ID: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 53asCsgVM1mBjjVkwwJQFT6XifI0B1nmOREpD1MwEzvOykIJpp.ux.SPg5RO2y9cZcDfujpnDT3vIW.lodUEfOJ1igTZySTVnORJaGhS_G0MvC4OOdndygiIdwnfVGzW7WA_2Zwx6gbyOiY- Received: from [68.225.82.218] by web52409.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:41:11 PST Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:41:11 -0800 (PST) From: probsd org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: freebsd desktop | mozilla X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:41:12 -0000 I'm a long time proponent of FreeBSD as a server. For a long time I've really wanted a FreeBSD system as a desktop. So, I decided to install the FreeBSD 6.2 and compile xorg, gnome, mozilla, etc... to give it a whirl. For anyone reading this, who wants the same thing. DO NOT DO IT. Nothing works. java is borked, mozilla and firefox are borked, gnome is ify.... ugh. Just dont do it. As a server, I highly recommend it... but it isn't ready for the desktop. --------------------------------- Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 23:44:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4740216A407 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4B743D5E for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:43:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GnkOt-0000HP-Cq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:24:07 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAONRCFw069977 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:27:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kAONRCtB069976 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:27:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:27:12 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <45677D45.3010606@digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <45677D45.3010606@digitaltorque.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611241727.12619.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec792a151ebaab27c5a292aa98d7a500d8e0350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: make config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:44:28 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 17:16, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Hello, > > When I type "make config" for a port and set some options, where are > they stored? > > Thanks, > Mike Whoops! Thats /var/db/ports//options lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 23:44:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D8E16A412 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:44:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: from web51115.mail.yahoo.com (web51115.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 334A643D62 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:44:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 19858 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Nov 2006 23:44:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=0t+NXz0w6SoA7PvDMxoXGahHfQDpOnZ933oreBVGJlmTHFcz00fLtamMhJQ2w4oY8KFPPREiuZB5CIf06IlIW5VC8JKSTqY0yD3upZ3QVaC9laANtsAGxsGz3JCaBL/9lv+R4na6S5LT4JXMdIDZOGLbI0o2MzsprmJKkjeHsLs=; X-YMail-OSG: .rMLeFQVM1mw4V8kjH3rwzv68QU3M7.0S.N3DdMpYd3F_R58fhHUUZm3lQD.1LHElRLR1RnolgXSBjKbj9_R6GIhOKfhehar9pKjCfFVLARA7H5tiIRcWKahJISXICY2TKK68iNdRFxpNrk- Received: from [82.170.181.144] by web51115.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:44:53 PST Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:44:53 -0800 (PST) From: Dino Vliet To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <147378.19698.qm@web51115.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: pure freebsd as backup server or freenas? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:44:55 -0000 Hi folks, I'm expecting to receive two harddisks which I've bought to put in a old pc to act as backup server. Now I'm planning it all and got stuck because of the options and particularly I'm having the following two choices: a) install a pure freebsd 6.1 box with geom/geli capabilities b) install freenas (www.freenas.org) Can somebody share his/her feelings regarding this matter? What are the advantages/disadvantages of both solutions? I guess I would really like to have a stable environment and mirroring and encryption are important to mee. Hope somenody can help. Thanks ____________________________________________________________________________________ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 23:55:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C86B16A412 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp5.server.rpi.edu (smtp5.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACAC43DB5 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:54:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp5.server.rpi.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAONtE5l026858; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:55:15 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <45676076.4020104@gmx.de> References: <45676076.4020104@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:55:14 -0500 To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org From: Garance A Drosehn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Cc: Subject: Re: PRs dead X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:55:33 -0000 At 10:13 PM +0100 11/24/06, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >Since the move to the new servers my followups disappear in an >unknown black home. Others told me that the same happens to the PRs >they try to send. I understand that unexpected things happen, but >this is basic infrastructure that doesn't work for some time, now. > >What's going on here? It is known that incoming PR's are not being handled quite right, but it might be a few more days before the problem is found and fixed. We're in the middle of a long holiday weekend here in the US. Apologies for the situation, but there's bound to be a few loose ends in a move like this. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = drosehn@rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 00:15:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D3A16A403 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9046A43D4C for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:14:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from kanga.digitaltorque.ca (hs-216-106-102-70.storm.ca [216.106.102.70]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAP0FPxh013547; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:15:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (tigger.digitaltorque.ca [192.168.1.3]) by kanga.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9436278; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:15:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54850240E2; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:15:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45678AF8.1090300@digitaltorque.ca> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:14:48 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Armin Pirkovitsch References: <45677D45.3010606@digitaltorque.ca> <45677EDF.5030409@inode.at> In-Reply-To: <45677EDF.5030409@inode.at> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA10D283239BE22A8EEE44345" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:15:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA10D283239BE22A8EEE44345 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: > Michael P. Soulier wrote: >> Hello, >> >> When I type "make config" for a port and set some options, where are >> they stored? >=20 > /var/db/ports//options >=20 Ok, great. For some reason building irssi without ipv6 support results in it using ipv6 anyway. Not sure why. Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --------------enigA10D283239BE22A8EEE44345 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFZ4r9KGqCc1vIvggRAtcWAJ9rbajdT9NvB6Ku4vFt82S/5KCQmwCeL9Bn yEV6s/dg4//W1ZfiXvAzcYM= =CnK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA10D283239BE22A8EEE44345-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 00:18:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B7016A40F for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (aum145.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.20.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B653443D5E for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:17:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAP0I5Pl001534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 01:18:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <45678BD8.2040305@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 01:18:32 +0100 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDD1C37AF965E7E77E99453F3" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.6, clamav-milter version 0.88.6 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: freebsd desktop | mozilla X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:18:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDD1C37AF965E7E77E99453F3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [resending to list] On 25/11/2006 00:41, probsd org wrote: > I'm a long time proponent of FreeBSD as a server. For a long time I've = really wanted a FreeBSD system as a desktop. So, I decided to install the= FreeBSD 6.2 and compile xorg, gnome, mozilla, etc... to give it a whirl.= > =20 > For anyone reading this, who wants the same thing.=20 > =20 > DO NOT DO IT. =20 I already did that few years ago, no problem. It's running 6-STABLE now. > Nothing works. java is borked, mozilla and firefox are borked, gnome is= ify.... ugh. java, mozilla, firefox, movies, music, tv, etc. works fine here. As you can see thunderbird, gnupg and even enigmail works too! If you've got problems send questions here (@freebsd-questions) but please be more specific next time. Regards, Karol --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enigDD1C37AF965E7E77E99453F3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFZ4vYezeoPAwGIYsRCLPiAJ9b06m/8NJn8df7TtHDyB2X8/OEGACfZl4/ jYk9mcZ8guyq2cHdfgwVTpA= =vBby -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDD1C37AF965E7E77E99453F3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 00:40:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3921A16A403 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ajm91qw@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5071443D53 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:39:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ajm91qw@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 59761 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2006 00:40:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=AEa+VWobJqqnxCHCZqquP6cFoaIc502/DMTAtCvRmRCaGVj85Cc/qYm5gSShFwFSvuIV/QQfPCtFH9ueHweH+ZgpVtjjuVOw/FInitYUte8s+yaMWIam2ErDnhuGUU0XDXeVZsKFfAZg+HqBCR3uKY6xGpLqZ1wy0r+ga6M5M10= ; Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (ajm91qw@sbcglobal.net@75.32.94.92 with plain) by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2006 00:40:33 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: jbCSjuEVM1npKXlP8wSrIR3pAj4I_IU9NeXg83KDtMxbwJCXViT80UPMyo5bXxWTCK.Tm1PtT0nfJXEFg6rCN8LB7fDP.dUTAhAlZElzTGePGTKfQ4jFLg-- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:38:43 -0600 From: ajm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061125003843.GA34248@powerfull.bsd> References: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: freebsd desktop | mozilla X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:40:35 -0000 On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:41:11PM -0800, probsd org wrote: > I'm a long time proponent of FreeBSD as a server. For a long time I've really wanted a FreeBSD system as a desktop. So, I decided to install the FreeBSD 6.2 and compile xorg, gnome, mozilla, etc... to give it a whirl. > > For anyone reading this, who wants the same thing. > > DO NOT DO IT. Nothing works. java is borked, mozilla and firefox are borked, gnome is ify.... ugh. > > Just dont do it. As a server, I highly recommend it... but it isn't ready for the desktop. > I have been using FreeBSD desktop since 5.1. I have three desktops, two have recently been upgraded with 6.1. I don't use java, so I can't tell you about that one. In the past I have used mozilla, then migrated over to firefox. I am currently using opera. I have used both KDE and Gnome, but I like something more light-weight, so I use Fluxbox. If you didn't like gnome, there others you could try. Just look in the /usr/ports/x11-wm/ directory. Perhaps it is the 6.2 that is giving you so much trouble. Why don't you give 6.1 a try. -- Alexander FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 00:49:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D887016A4A0 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:49:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADA343D64 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:49:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.localdomain (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A20B5191F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:49:56 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:49:53 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611250049.53630.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: freebsd desktop | mozilla X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:49:57 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 23:41, probsd org wrote: > I'm a long time proponent of FreeBSD as a server. For a long time I've > really wanted a FreeBSD system as a desktop. So, I decided to install the > FreeBSD 6.2 and compile xorg, gnome, mozilla, etc... to give it a whirl. > > For anyone reading this, who wants the same thing. > > DO NOT DO IT. Nothing works. java is borked, mozilla and firefox are > borked, gnome is ify.... ugh. > > Just dont do it. As a server, I highly recommend it... but it isn't > ready for the desktop. It works for me. You must have screwed-up. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 02:42:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F8A16A40F for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mchauber@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90E4843D68 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:42:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mchauber@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2006 02:42:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [192.168.1.100]) [204.116.241.218] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 25 Nov 2006 03:42:50 +0100 X-Authenticated: #15034054 From: Mike Hauber To: "FreeBSD, Questions" Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:44:04 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 X-Copyright-Notice: 2006 Michael C. Hauber X-Copyright-Info: This transmission, including any data found herein is copyrighted material and may not be copied, forwarded, or repeated by any means without written consent from the copyright owner. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611242144.05499.mchauber@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: BSD folks position on GPL, Novell, IBM, SCO, and MS... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mchauber@gmx.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:42:53 -0000 i am by no means trolling here. I just haven't heard much of anything from the BSD community on the subjects, and would like to know the general consensus. Being that this is more of a support mailing list, if one could direct me to where I can ask this question appropriately, or if folks would reply only to my email addy, that would be fine, too. Impositions here are not my intent. I have been an avid user of the BSDs (mostly FreeBSD and OpenBSD), and have experimented with the Linuses for a good while now (Mainly Debian, RH, and SuSe). I pretty much get it that the BSD folks and the Linux folks don't see eye-to-eye on licensing issues, but it seems to me that the overall attempt of both communities seems to be "get the code out there and keep it free." I was just wondering what the general consensus was on the GPL, Linux in general, SCOs lawsuit, Sun's open sourcing, IBMs contributions to Linux, Novell's contributions, Novell's deal with MS and how this really affects SuSe (there's a lot of hype on that and I literally don't know what to believe at this point). Being that most folks here would be in positions of having to deal with a variety of OSs and have in the past dealt with opposing forces at work, I figured there would be at least one or two educated folks I could gleen from. Thanks, and sorry for the imposition, Mike PS... One more question... Being that Linux emulation is available as a port for the BSDs, I would assume (but haven't taken the time to research) that GPLd code is used. If there comes to be issues with Linux, what would that mean for BSDs compatibility in regards to emulation? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 05:30:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970EE16A412 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from service@fixer.com) Received: from amos.mail.atl.earthlink.net (amos.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9B543D58 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:29:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from service@fixer.com) Received: from 175-pool1.ras01.den01.dial.cogentco.com ([206.149.128.175]) by amos.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1Gnq7I-0006dE-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:30:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4567C6EF.4040008@fixer.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:30:39 -0700 From: service User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050420 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: packages failing to load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:30:22 -0000 uname -a FreeBSD localhost 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 24 08:54:35 UTC 2006 root@:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/VIL i386 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I had FreeBSD-5.4 for about one and a half years. Loading packages with "pkg_add -r" was very easy. Suddenly "pkg_add -r" no longer works. Looking at freebsd's ftp sites, they got rid of the 5.4 release. They now have a 5.5 release. I tried downloading from "packages-5-stable" and "packages-5.5-stable". About 50 percent of these programs fail. I get error messages that say something like "/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libexpat.so.6" not found". I'm not sure, but I think files ending in "so.6", belong in version 6, not version 5. I have more than 10 versions of FreeBSD. I tried using packages off these CDs. some of them worked, but most of the time I keep getting error messages. What can I do? Thanks in advance, bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 06:23:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE4C16A40F for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from pukruppa.net (pukruppa.net [213.146.114.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DB843D60 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:22:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from pukruppa.net (pukruppa.net [213.146.114.24]) by pukruppa.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAP6NcUe022141; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:23:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:23:37 +0100 (CET) From: "P.U.Kruppa" To: Mike Hauber In-Reply-To: <200611242144.05499.mchauber@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20061125072616.T12918@pukruppa.net> References: <200611242144.05499.mchauber@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "FreeBSD, Questions" Subject: Re: BSD folks position on GPL, Novell, IBM, SCO, and MS... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:23:35 -0000 On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Mike Hauber wrote: > i am by no means trolling here. I just haven't heard much of anything from > the BSD community on the subjects, and would like to know the general > consensus. Being that this is more of a support mailing list, if one could > direct me to where I can ask this question appropriately, or if folks would > reply only to my email addy, that would be fine, too. Impositions here are > not my intent. > > I have been an avid user of the BSDs (mostly FreeBSD and OpenBSD), and have > experimented with the Linuses for a good while now (Mainly Debian, RH, and > SuSe). I pretty much get it that the BSD folks and the Linux folks don't see > eye-to-eye on licensing issues, but it seems to me that the overall attempt > of both communities seems to be "get the code out there and keep it free." > > I was just wondering what the general consensus was on the GPL, Linux in > general, SCOs lawsuit, Sun's open sourcing, IBMs contributions to Linux, > Novell's contributions, Novell's deal with MS and how this really affects > SuSe (there's a lot of hype on that and I literally don't know what to > believe at this point). > > Being that most folks here would be in positions of having to deal with a > variety of OSs and have in the past dealt with opposing forces at work, I > figured there would be at least one or two educated folks I could gleen from. > > Thanks, and sorry for the imposition, > > Mike > > > PS... One more question... Being that Linux emulation is available as a port > for the BSDs, I would assume (but haven't taken the time to research) that > GPLd code is used. If there comes to be issues with Linux, what would that > mean for BSDs compatibility in regards to emulation? I think there's a list called freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org for non-technical discussions. Regards, Peter Ulrich Kruppa Wuppertal Germany From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 08:46:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7DA16A403 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:46:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A114B43D55 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:45:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=relay.plus.net) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1GntBG-0000jn-DR; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:46:38 +0000 X-Mailer: Ultrafunk Popcorn release 1.24 (06-Sep-2002) X-URL: http://www.ultrafunk.com/products/popcorn Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:48:01 +0000 From: Graham Bentley To: freebsd@meijome.net, custompc@custompc.plus.com Message-Id: <20061125084554.A114B43D55@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: > Subject: Re: Ezmlm Port Okay Or Junk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: admin@cpcnw.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:46:41 -0000 >Graham, please include the list in the reply - it doesn't help anyone else to >have a private chat :) Sorry about that .... >> I didnt keep a list but mplayers extra codecs spring to mind. >hmmm my mplayer and mplayer-skins having a nit with some skin it cant find >(it may be that I chose a bunch of skins to include as an option...will clean >completely and retry soon). win32-codecs has security holes, but if you dont >care about this, it should install fine. All repo's where tried without luck. I DL'ed them seperatly. The filename was wrong in the script. I assumed that this was because 6.2RC1 .iso ports list may be out of date ? I didnt realise audio codecs could have security issues (noticed that anything I install from ports carries a security notice?) however I need to listen to my voicemail. I alos tried the JRE / Fox setup which worked in 6.1 but not in 6.2 >if it really is a big problem for you, please consider submitting a PR with >fixes for specific issues you've found. Or report them via PR at least (as >nobody will fix something that is not known to be broken). OK, this wasnt a complaint, just trying to undersand what a RC is compared to a full release. I realise also that there are 1000's of ports and not every single one can be monitored and tested constantly. What is the 'Official Procedure' for reporting problems with ports or any other aspect ? I always try googling and this list in that order. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 09:27:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030FD16A403 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AE4243D49 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:27:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2006 09:27:52 -0000 Received: from p54A7F324.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.0.12]) [84.167.243.36] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 25 Nov 2006 10:27:52 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5465401 Message-ID: <45680CE5.2030603@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:29:09 +0100 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Organization: Lords of Nightmare User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mchauber@gmx.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200611242144.05499.mchauber@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200611242144.05499.mchauber@gmx.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: BSD folks position on GPL, Novell, IBM, SCO, and MS... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:27:57 -0000 Mike Hauber wrote: > i am by no means trolling here. I just haven't heard much of anything from > the BSD community on the subjects, and would like to know the general > consensus. Being that this is more of a support mailing list, if one could > direct me to where I can ask this question appropriately, or if folks would > reply only to my email addy, that would be fine, too. Impositions here are > not my intent. > > I have been an avid user of the BSDs (mostly FreeBSD and OpenBSD), and have > experimented with the Linuses for a good while now (Mainly Debian, RH, and > SuSe). I pretty much get it that the BSD folks and the Linux folks don't see > eye-to-eye on licensing issues, but it seems to me that the overall attempt > of both communities seems to be "get the code out there and keep it free." This is where you are wrong. The BSD approach is "get free code out there", while the GPL approach is "get open code out there and keep it open" (open != free). You can argue about the meanings of the words free and open, but those are the two approaches. I think the FreeBSD approach (this is the way I see it) is to use whatever is free to be used. Licensing issue only bother us, where they threaten the BSD license (i.e. GPL Kernel modules where the headers are also GPL code, would enforce the GPL upon the whole Kernel). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 10:45:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A2D16A40F for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:45:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E9B43D49 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:45:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so668400pyh for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:45:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tsEB6A7vdLYoc8a8YPE0PYrE7qwZdRCYErJiVV7AeQdG8fuiEShH6oJJNl4iCL/KKaElDmGrzQX7TPOW8mYIybDO7TNuXV81dZqpT8M+1P7WPpCWIeiQZr4PFaprEm16ZFs1EX7lL3cWqSpty5Hxm8ZRUAdgBR01PZJEHM4icdU= Received: by 10.35.17.12 with SMTP id u12mr8017140pyi.1164451550666; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:45:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:45:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611250245k1452c44el8149cff1a2e25da8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:45:25 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Gerard Seibert" In-Reply-To: <20061124172714.D73335@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611241302q77bf1d6etd59c7624562a65fe@mail.gmail.com> <45675EE1.9010101@t-hosting.hu> <20061124172714.D73335@scorpio.seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?K=EF=BF=BDvesd=EF=BF=BDn_G=EF=BF=BDbor?= , FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How 2 Configure Makefile before "make install clean" from the ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:45:52 -0000 T24gMTEvMjQvMDYsIEdlcmFyZCBTZWliZXJ0IDxnZXJhcmRAc2VpYmVyY29tLm5ldD4gd3JvdGU6 Cj4KPiBPbiBGcmksIDI0IE5vdiAyMDA2LCBL77+9dmVzZO+/vW4gR++/vWJvciB3cm90ZToKPgo+ ID4gVmVlSmF5IGVzY3JpYmnvv706Cj4gPj4gSGkKPiA+Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+PiBJIHdhbnQg dG8gaW5zdGFsbCBhcGFjaGUyMCBmcm9tIHRoZSBwb3J0cy4gQnV0IGJlZm9yZSBpbnN0YWxsaW5n LCBJCj4gd2FudCB0bwo+ID4+IGVuYWJsZS9kaXNhYmxlIHNvbWUgb2YgdGhlIG1vZHVsZXMgYXMg Zm9sbG93Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLi9jb25maWd1cmUgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLS1wcmVm aXg9L3Vzci9sb2NhbC9hcGFjaGUyIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0td2l0aC1tcG09cHJlZm9yayBcCj4g Pj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtY2hhcnNldC1saXRlIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1pbmNs dWRlIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1lbnYgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLS1kaXNhYmxlLXNldGVu dmlmIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1zdGF0dXMgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLS1kaXNhYmxlLWF1 dG9pbmRleCBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtYXNpcyBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUt Y2dpIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1uZWdvdGlhdGlvbiBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2Fi bGUtaW1hcCBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtYWN0aW9ucyBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2Fi bGUtdXNlcmRpciBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtYWxpYXMgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ ID4+IEJ1dCBJIGhhdmUgdHJpZWQgbWFueSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgd2F5cyB0byBjb25maWd1cmUgYmVm b3JlIGdpdmluZwo+ID4+IGNvbW1hbmQgIm1ha2UgaW5zdGFsbCBjbGVhbiIuIEJ1dCBoYXZlbid0 IGhhZCBhbnkgbHVjay4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+IENvdWxkIHlvdSBwbGVhc2UgZ3VpZGUgbWUgdGhhdCBI b3cgY2FuIEkgY29uZmlndXJlIHRoZSBNYWtlZmlsZSBiZWZvcmUKPiA+PiBpbnN0YWxsaW5nIGFw YWNoZT8KPiA+Pgo+ID4+IEZvciBleGFtcGxlCj4gPj4KPiA+PiBXaGVuIEkgZ2l2ZSAibWFrZSBj b25maWciIGNvbW1hbmQgSSBnZXQgZXJyb3IgYXMgZm9sbG93Ogo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+ ICMgbWFrZSBjb25maWcKPiA+PiA9PT0+IE5vIG9wdGlvbnMgdG8gY29uZmlndXJlCj4gPj4KPiA+ Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+IEkgaGF2ZSBhbHNvIHRyaWVkIC0tZW5hYmxlLU9QVElPTiBh bmQgLS1kaXNhYmxlLU9QVElPTi4uLiBpbiBNYWtlZmlsZS4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gYnV0IGRp ZG4ndCBoYWQgYW55IGx1Y2suLi4uIDooCj4gPj4KPiA+PiBDb3VsZCB5b3UgYXR0YWNoZSBhIE1h a2VmaWxlIHNob3dpbmcgcGxhY2VzIHdoZXJlIHRvIHB1dCB0aGVzZSBzd2l0Y2hlcwo+IGFuZAo+ ID4+IGhvdz8gIEkgd2lsbCBiZSByZWFsbHkgdmVyeSBncmF0ZWZ1bGwuLi4uCj4gPj4KPiA+IFdo ZW4geW91IHRyeSB0byBpbnN0YWxsIGl0LCBpdCBwcmludHMgYSBidW5jaCBvZiBrbm9icywgeW91 IGNhbiB1c2UsIGUuZwo+IC4KPiA+IFdJVEhfU1NMX01PRFVMRVMsIGV0Yy4gWW91IGNhbiBzZXQg c3VjaCBpbiB0aGlzIHdheToKPiA+IG1ha2UgV0lUSF9TU0xfTU9EVUxFUz15ZXMgaW5zdGFsbCBj bGVhbgo+Cj4gSSB0aGluayB0aGUgZWFzaWVzdCBtZXRob2QgaXMgdG8gZGV0ZXJtaW5lIGV4YWN0 bHkgd2hhdCBrbm9icyB5b3Ugd2FudCB0bwo+IGVtcGxveSwgdGhlbiBwbGFjZSB0aGVtIGluIHRo ZSAvZXRjL21ha2UuY29uZiBmaWxlLgo+Cj4gL2V0Yy9tYWtlLmNvbmYKPiAjIEFwYWNoZSAyLjIu Mi4gc2VjdGlvbgo+IC5pZiAkKC5DVVJESVI6TSovd3d3L2FwYWNoZTIyKQo+IFdJVEhfREJNPWJk Ygo+IFdJVEhfQkVSS0VMRVlEQj1kYjQyCj4gLmVuZGlmCj4KPiBPYnZpb3VzbHksIHlvdSBlbnRl ciB0aGUga25vYnMgeW91IHdhbnQgdG8gdXNlLiBBbiBhZHZhbnRhZ2UgdG8gdGhpcwo+IG1ldGhv ZCBpcyB0aGF0IHNob3VsZCB5b3UgdXBkYXRlIEFwYWNoZSBhdCBzb21lIHBvaW50LCB0aGVzZSBr bm9icyB3aWxsIGJlCj4gdXNlZCBieSB0aGUgbmV3ZXIgdmVyc2lvbi4KPgo+IC0tCj4gR2VyYXJk Cj4gZ2VyYXJkQHNlaWJlcmNvbS5uZXQKPgo+IE1pa2U6ICAgIlRoZSBGb3VydGggRGltZW5zaW9u IGlzIGEgc2hhbWJsZXM/Igo+IEJlcm5pZTogIk5vYm9keSBldmVyIGVtcHRpZXMgdGhlIGFzaHRy YXlzLiAgUGVvcGxlIGFyZSBTTwo+ICAgICAgICBpbmNvbnNpZGVyYXRlLiIKPgo+ICAgICAgICBH YXJ5IFRydWRlYXUsICJEb29uZXNidXJ5Igo+CgoKSG93IGFib3V0IHRvIHdyaXRlIGxpa2UgdGhp cz8KCgptYWtlIFdJVEhPVVRfTU9EVUxFUz0iY2hhcnNldC1saXRlIGluY2x1ZGUgZW52IHNldGVu dmlmIHN0YXR1cyBhdXRvaW5kZXgKYXNpcyBjZ2kgbmVnb3RpYXRpb24gaW1hcCBhY3Rpb25zIHVz ZXJkaXIgYWxpYXMgc28iCldJVEhfTU9EVUxFUz0ibXBtPXByZWZvcmsgYWNjZXNzIGF1dGggbG9n X2NvbmZpZyBtaW1lIGRpciIKCgotLSAKVGhhbmtzIQoKQlIgLyB2ago= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 10:54:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB0E16A403 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D8343D5A for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:53:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so669458pyh for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:54:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Z1nwkghB4ul5B0GyrD+UIfTc5hD78z6SLGZ1q36y2xiiC56XxBVLthZxIqCK4a1Sf7SD2MxWv9lAFgZdD+5jmvayd0nBUSJyrbwT5PP6B+rpbp7h4vilK6Skk63MhBTuvpKPbX2JinJdtcsQYLF6ZfwSKI0nyM19ALdB2Ry0qFA= Received: by 10.35.49.15 with SMTP id b15mr8027067pyk.1164452049912; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:54:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.32.4 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:53:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611250253i5e5bb29bt4db2e5e67629dc09@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:53:49 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Gerard Seibert" In-Reply-To: <20061124172714.D73335@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611241302q77bf1d6etd59c7624562a65fe@mail.gmail.com> <45675EE1.9010101@t-hosting.hu> <20061124172714.D73335@scorpio.seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?K=EF=BF=BDvesd=EF=BF=BDn_G=EF=BF=BDbor?= , FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How 2 Configure Makefile before "make install clean" from the ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:54:11 -0000 T24gMTEvMjQvMDYsIEdlcmFyZCBTZWliZXJ0IDxnZXJhcmRAc2VpYmVyY29tLm5ldD4gd3JvdGU6 Cj4KPiBPbiBGcmksIDI0IE5vdiAyMDA2LCBL77+9dmVzZO+/vW4gR++/vWJvciB3cm90ZToKPgo+ ID4gVmVlSmF5IGVzY3JpYmnvv706Cj4gPj4gSGkKPiA+Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+PiBJIHdhbnQg dG8gaW5zdGFsbCBhcGFjaGUyMCBmcm9tIHRoZSBwb3J0cy4gQnV0IGJlZm9yZSBpbnN0YWxsaW5n LCBJCj4gd2FudCB0bwo+ID4+IGVuYWJsZS9kaXNhYmxlIHNvbWUgb2YgdGhlIG1vZHVsZXMgYXMg Zm9sbG93Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLi9jb25maWd1cmUgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLS1wcmVm aXg9L3Vzci9sb2NhbC9hcGFjaGUyIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0td2l0aC1tcG09cHJlZm9yayBcCj4g Pj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtY2hhcnNldC1saXRlIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1pbmNs dWRlIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1lbnYgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLS1kaXNhYmxlLXNldGVu dmlmIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1zdGF0dXMgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLS1kaXNhYmxlLWF1 dG9pbmRleCBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtYXNpcyBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUt Y2dpIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1uZWdvdGlhdGlvbiBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2Fi bGUtaW1hcCBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtYWN0aW9ucyBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2Fi bGUtdXNlcmRpciBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtYWxpYXMgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ ID4+IEJ1dCBJIGhhdmUgdHJpZWQgbWFueSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgd2F5cyB0byBjb25maWd1cmUgYmVm b3JlIGdpdmluZwo+ID4+IGNvbW1hbmQgIm1ha2UgaW5zdGFsbCBjbGVhbiIuIEJ1dCBoYXZlbid0 IGhhZCBhbnkgbHVjay4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+IENvdWxkIHlvdSBwbGVhc2UgZ3VpZGUgbWUgdGhhdCBI b3cgY2FuIEkgY29uZmlndXJlIHRoZSBNYWtlZmlsZSBiZWZvcmUKPiA+PiBpbnN0YWxsaW5nIGFw YWNoZT8KPiA+Pgo+ID4+IEZvciBleGFtcGxlCj4gPj4KPiA+PiBXaGVuIEkgZ2l2ZSAibWFrZSBj b25maWciIGNvbW1hbmQgSSBnZXQgZXJyb3IgYXMgZm9sbG93Ogo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+ ICMgbWFrZSBjb25maWcKPiA+PiA9PT0+IE5vIG9wdGlvbnMgdG8gY29uZmlndXJlCj4gPj4KPiA+ Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+IEkgaGF2ZSBhbHNvIHRyaWVkIC0tZW5hYmxlLU9QVElPTiBh bmQgLS1kaXNhYmxlLU9QVElPTi4uLiBpbiBNYWtlZmlsZS4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gYnV0IGRp ZG4ndCBoYWQgYW55IGx1Y2suLi4uIDooCj4gPj4KPiA+PiBDb3VsZCB5b3UgYXR0YWNoZSBhIE1h a2VmaWxlIHNob3dpbmcgcGxhY2VzIHdoZXJlIHRvIHB1dCB0aGVzZSBzd2l0Y2hlcwo+IGFuZAo+ ID4+IGhvdz8gIEkgd2lsbCBiZSByZWFsbHkgdmVyeSBncmF0ZWZ1bGwuLi4uCj4gPj4KPiA+IFdo ZW4geW91IHRyeSB0byBpbnN0YWxsIGl0LCBpdCBwcmludHMgYSBidW5jaCBvZiBrbm9icywgeW91 IGNhbiB1c2UsIGUuZwo+IC4KPiA+IFdJVEhfU1NMX01PRFVMRVMsIGV0Yy4gWW91IGNhbiBzZXQg c3VjaCBpbiB0aGlzIHdheToKPiA+IG1ha2UgV0lUSF9TU0xfTU9EVUxFUz15ZXMgaW5zdGFsbCBj bGVhbgo+Cj4gSSB0aGluayB0aGUgZWFzaWVzdCBtZXRob2QgaXMgdG8gZGV0ZXJtaW5lIGV4YWN0 bHkgd2hhdCBrbm9icyB5b3Ugd2FudCB0bwo+IGVtcGxveSwgdGhlbiBwbGFjZSB0aGVtIGluIHRo ZSAvZXRjL21ha2UuY29uZiBmaWxlLgo+Cj4gL2V0Yy9tYWtlLmNvbmYKPiAjIEFwYWNoZSAyLjIu Mi4gc2VjdGlvbgo+IC5pZiAkKC5DVVJESVI6TSovd3d3L2FwYWNoZTIyKQo+IFdJVEhfREJNPWJk Ygo+IFdJVEhfQkVSS0VMRVlEQj1kYjQyCj4gLmVuZGlmCj4KPiBPYnZpb3VzbHksIHlvdSBlbnRl ciB0aGUga25vYnMgeW91IHdhbnQgdG8gdXNlLiBBbiBhZHZhbnRhZ2UgdG8gdGhpcwo+IG1ldGhv ZCBpcyB0aGF0IHNob3VsZCB5b3UgdXBkYXRlIEFwYWNoZSBhdCBzb21lIHBvaW50LCB0aGVzZSBr bm9icyB3aWxsIGJlCj4gdXNlZCBieSB0aGUgbmV3ZXIgdmVyc2lvbi4KPgo+IC0tCj4gR2VyYXJk Cj4gZ2VyYXJkQHNlaWJlcmNvbS5uZXQKPgo+IE1pa2U6ICAgIlRoZSBGb3VydGggRGltZW5zaW9u IGlzIGEgc2hhbWJsZXM/Igo+IEJlcm5pZTogIk5vYm9keSBldmVyIGVtcHRpZXMgdGhlIGFzaHRy YXlzLiAgUGVvcGxlIGFyZSBTTwo+ICAgICAgICBpbmNvbnNpZGVyYXRlLiIKPgo+ICAgICAgICBH YXJ5IFRydWRlYXUsICJEb29uZXNidXJ5Igo+CgoKSG93IGFib3V0IHRvIHdyaXRlIGxpa2UgdGhp cz8KCgptYWtlIFdJVEhPVVRfTU9EVUxFUz0iY2hhcnNldC1saXRlIGluY2x1ZGUgZW52IHNldGVu dmlmIHN0YXR1cyBhdXRvaW5kZXgKYXNpcyBjZ2kgbmVnb3RpYXRpb24gaW1hcCBhY3Rpb25zIHVz ZXJkaXIgYWxpYXMgc28iCldJVEhfTU9EVUxFUz0ibXBtPXByZWZvcmsgYWNjZXNzIGF1dGggbG9n X2NvbmZpZyBtaW1lIGRpciIKQW5kIGFmdGVyIGNvbXBpbGluZyB3aXRoIGFib3ZlIGNvbW1hbmQs IEkgYW0gZ2V0dGluZyB0aGlzIGVycm9yIHdoZW4gcnVubmluZwphcGFjaGUKCiMgL3Vzci9sb2Nh bC9zYmluL2FwYWNoZWN0bCBzdGFydApTeW50YXggZXJyb3Igb24gbGluZSA0MSBvZiAvdXNyL2xv Y2FsL2V0Yy9hcGFjaGUyL2h0dHBkLmNvbmY6CkludmFsaWQgY29tbWFuZCAnT3JkZXInLCBwZXJo YXBzIG1pcy1zcGVsbGVkIG9yIGRlZmluZWQgYnkgYSBtb2R1bGUgbm90CmluY2x1ZGVkIGluIHRo ZSBzZXJ2ZXIgY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbgpFdmVuIHRob3VnaCBJIGhhdmUgYWRkZWQgYWNjZXNzLCBh dXRoIG1vZHVsZXMgYWxyZWFkeS4uLi4gaW4gdGhlIG1ha2UKY29tbWFuZC4uLgoKUGxlYXNlIGhl bHAhISEKCi0tIApUaGFua3MhCgpCUiAvIHZqCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 10:57:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED76A16A407 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: from web51102.mail.yahoo.com (web51102.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53B4E43D53 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:56:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 87363 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Nov 2006 10:57:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=cqqH5ujLBPMfpD5XImvMBJCELrnHSteHg7GR7N3O2WL2/ECy72tvIGKSvcQEwd+IKZtgtOAem/Jwimki61DK1+pHtRx7RGEFW+Y/VzAYY7LllEbszZBV7LCz1P3GJ7K+JMzWk0dgyovQGmQrun1FR3KuGfEEZ25s6OFCLUkAgO0=; X-YMail-OSG: Fk1E0NEVM1lnGu671Jj6CxmUIKSlvM2FPalSc8_STpTyoPErKWJTSp_b9JjNXzM.o_umbKzV6ISug.j4mX20jAh1kUhaHx4W1xkMjsk6uPBig3ndFmfPUspgm_abw0W33VbReZz0yo0SnQw- Received: from [82.170.181.144] by web51102.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:57:13 PST Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:57:13 -0800 (PST) From: Dino Vliet To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <487206.86644.qm@web51102.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: build fails for openoffice on amd64 system unning FreeBSD 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:57:15 -0000 Hy gents, why do I get this error when I try to upgrade openoffice? The system is a amd64 machine running freebsd 6.1. The error message I get is: => unowinreg.dll doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/openoffice.org2.0. => Attempting to fetch from http://tools.openoffice.org/unowinreg_prebuild/680/. fetch: http://tools.openoffice.org/unowinreg_prebuild/680/unowinreg.dll: Requested Range Not Satisfiable => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/openoffice.org2.0/. fetch: unowinreg.dll: local modification time does not match remote => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/openoffice.org2.0 and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.43282.0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=openoffice.org-2.0.4.rc3 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.0.4.rc3 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! editors/openoffice.org-2 (openoffice.org-2.0.4.rc3) (checksum mismatch) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed What I don't get, is the problem with this unowinreg.dll Hope somebody can get me on the right track again, Thanks ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 11:27:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADF416A40F for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:27:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D67343D78 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:26:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1016308wxc for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:27:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=RGlvt04+oRPYxPPmMZeVxQDz3WbNELlqmBp04kSPRPKFGCHFa5eVuZz7shejOKMmyhioJckkfHrBhv2z+ckCdBmFKHMvE6mlyT+UW3NB7CwJJ5zOrpAtUn1eIAQ1sHOBwv53GcWgTKoEM7pYB61CE/8BK5DDGMOOeWqzuKC7d5s= Received: by 10.100.153.9 with SMTP id a9mr1350199ane.1164454029677; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:27:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:27:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611250327k6599261dk8296efb1da05ac4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:27:09 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Gerard Seibert" In-Reply-To: <20061124172714.D73335@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611241302q77bf1d6etd59c7624562a65fe@mail.gmail.com> <45675EE1.9010101@t-hosting.hu> <20061124172714.D73335@scorpio.seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?K=EF=BF=BDvesd=EF=BF=BDn_G=EF=BF=BDbor?= , FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How 2 Configure Makefile before "make install clean" from the ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:27:13 -0000 T24gMTEvMjQvMDYsIEdlcmFyZCBTZWliZXJ0IDxnZXJhcmRAc2VpYmVyY29tLm5ldD4gd3JvdGU6 Cj4KPiBPbiBGcmksIDI0IE5vdiAyMDA2LCBL77+9dmVzZO+/vW4gR++/vWJvciB3cm90ZToKPgo+ ID4gVmVlSmF5IGVzY3JpYmnvv706Cj4gPj4gSGkKPiA+Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+PiBJIHdhbnQg dG8gaW5zdGFsbCBhcGFjaGUyMCBmcm9tIHRoZSBwb3J0cy4gQnV0IGJlZm9yZSBpbnN0YWxsaW5n LCBJCj4gd2FudCB0bwo+ID4+IGVuYWJsZS9kaXNhYmxlIHNvbWUgb2YgdGhlIG1vZHVsZXMgYXMg Zm9sbG93Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLi9jb25maWd1cmUgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLS1wcmVm aXg9L3Vzci9sb2NhbC9hcGFjaGUyIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0td2l0aC1tcG09cHJlZm9yayBcCj4g Pj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtY2hhcnNldC1saXRlIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1pbmNs dWRlIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1lbnYgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLS1kaXNhYmxlLXNldGVu dmlmIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1zdGF0dXMgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gLS1kaXNhYmxlLWF1 dG9pbmRleCBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtYXNpcyBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUt Y2dpIFwKPiA+Pgo+ID4+IC0tZGlzYWJsZS1uZWdvdGlhdGlvbiBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2Fi bGUtaW1hcCBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtYWN0aW9ucyBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2Fi bGUtdXNlcmRpciBcCj4gPj4KPiA+PiAtLWRpc2FibGUtYWxpYXMgXAo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ ID4+IEJ1dCBJIGhhdmUgdHJpZWQgbWFueSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgd2F5cyB0byBjb25maWd1cmUgYmVm b3JlIGdpdmluZwo+ID4+IGNvbW1hbmQgIm1ha2UgaW5zdGFsbCBjbGVhbiIuIEJ1dCBoYXZlbid0 IGhhZCBhbnkgbHVjay4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+IENvdWxkIHlvdSBwbGVhc2UgZ3VpZGUgbWUgdGhhdCBI b3cgY2FuIEkgY29uZmlndXJlIHRoZSBNYWtlZmlsZSBiZWZvcmUKPiA+PiBpbnN0YWxsaW5nIGFw YWNoZT8KPiA+Pgo+ID4+IEZvciBleGFtcGxlCj4gPj4KPiA+PiBXaGVuIEkgZ2l2ZSAibWFrZSBj b25maWciIGNvbW1hbmQgSSBnZXQgZXJyb3IgYXMgZm9sbG93Ogo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+ ICMgbWFrZSBjb25maWcKPiA+PiA9PT0+IE5vIG9wdGlvbnMgdG8gY29uZmlndXJlCj4gPj4KPiA+ Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+IEkgaGF2ZSBhbHNvIHRyaWVkIC0tZW5hYmxlLU9QVElPTiBh bmQgLS1kaXNhYmxlLU9QVElPTi4uLiBpbiBNYWtlZmlsZS4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gYnV0IGRp ZG4ndCBoYWQgYW55IGx1Y2suLi4uIDooCj4gPj4KPiA+PiBDb3VsZCB5b3UgYXR0YWNoZSBhIE1h a2VmaWxlIHNob3dpbmcgcGxhY2VzIHdoZXJlIHRvIHB1dCB0aGVzZSBzd2l0Y2hlcwo+IGFuZAo+ ID4+IGhvdz8gIEkgd2lsbCBiZSByZWFsbHkgdmVyeSBncmF0ZWZ1bGwuLi4uCj4gPj4KPiA+IFdo ZW4geW91IHRyeSB0byBpbnN0YWxsIGl0LCBpdCBwcmludHMgYSBidW5jaCBvZiBrbm9icywgeW91 IGNhbiB1c2UsIGUuZwo+IC4KPiA+IFdJVEhfU1NMX01PRFVMRVMsIGV0Yy4gWW91IGNhbiBzZXQg c3VjaCBpbiB0aGlzIHdheToKPiA+IG1ha2UgV0lUSF9TU0xfTU9EVUxFUz15ZXMgaW5zdGFsbCBj bGVhbgo+Cj4gSSB0aGluayB0aGUgZWFzaWVzdCBtZXRob2QgaXMgdG8gZGV0ZXJtaW5lIGV4YWN0 bHkgd2hhdCBrbm9icyB5b3Ugd2FudCB0bwo+IGVtcGxveSwgdGhlbiBwbGFjZSB0aGVtIGluIHRo ZSAvZXRjL21ha2UuY29uZiBmaWxlLgo+Cj4gL2V0Yy9tYWtlLmNvbmYKPiAjIEFwYWNoZSAyLjIu Mi4gc2VjdGlvbgo+IC5pZiAkKC5DVVJESVI6TSovd3d3L2FwYWNoZTIyKQo+IFdJVEhfREJNPWJk Ygo+IFdJVEhfQkVSS0VMRVlEQj1kYjQyCj4gLmVuZGlmCj4KPiBPYnZpb3VzbHksIHlvdSBlbnRl ciB0aGUga25vYnMgeW91IHdhbnQgdG8gdXNlLiBBbiBhZHZhbnRhZ2UgdG8gdGhpcwo+IG1ldGhv ZCBpcyB0aGF0IHNob3VsZCB5b3UgdXBkYXRlIEFwYWNoZSBhdCBzb21lIHBvaW50LCB0aGVzZSBr bm9icyB3aWxsIGJlCj4KPiB1c2VkIGJ5IHRoZSBuZXdlciB2ZXJzaW9uLgo+Cj4gLS0KPiBHZXJh cmQKPiBnZXJhcmRAc2VpYmVyY29tLm5ldAo+Cj4gTWlrZTogICAiVGhlIEZvdXJ0aCBEaW1lbnNp b24gaXMgYSBzaGFtYmxlcz8iCj4gQmVybmllOiAiTm9ib2R5IGV2ZXIgZW1wdGllcyB0aGUgYXNo dHJheXMuICBQZW9wbGUgYXJlIFNPCj4gICAgICAgIGluY29uc2lkZXJhdGUuIgo+Cj4gICAgICAg IEdhcnkgVHJ1ZGVhdSwgIkRvb25lc2J1cnkiCj4KCgoKSGkKCgoKSG93IGFib3V0IHRvIHdyaXRl IGxpa2UgdGhpcz8KCgoKbWFrZSBXSVRIT1VUX01PRFVMRVM9ImNoYXJzZXQtbGl0ZSBpbmNsdWRl IGVudiBzZXRlbnZpZiBzdGF0dXMgYXV0b2luZGV4CmFzaXMgY2dpIG5lZ290aWF0aW9uIGltYXAg YWN0aW9ucyB1c2VyZGlyIGFsaWFzIHNvIgpXSVRIX01PRFVMRVM9Im1wbT1wcmVmb3JrIGFjY2Vz cyBhdXRoIGxvZ19jb25maWcgbWltZSBkaXIiCgpBbmQgYWZ0ZXIgY29tcGlsaW5nIHdpdGggYWJv dmUgY29tbWFuZCwgSSBhbSBnZXR0aW5nIHRoaXMgZXJyb3Igd2hlbiBydW5uaW5nCmFwYWNoZQoK CgojIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvc2Jpbi9hcGFjaGVjdGwgc3RhcnQKU3ludGF4IGVycm9yIG9uIGxpbmUg NDEgb2YgL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9ldGMvYXBhY2hlMi9odHRwZC5jb25mOgpJbnZhbGlkIGNvbW1hbmQg J09yZGVyJywgcGVyaGFwcyBtaXMtc3BlbGxlZCBvciBkZWZpbmVkIGJ5IGEgbW9kdWxlIG5vdApp bmNsdWRlZCBpbiB0aGUgc2VydmVyIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24KCkV2ZW4gdGhvdWdoIEkgaGF2ZSBh ZGRlZCBhY2Nlc3MsIGF1dGggbW9kdWxlcyBhbHJlYWR5Li4uLiBpbiB0aGUgbWFrZQpjb21tYW5k Li4uCgpQbGVhc2UgaGVscCEhIQoKCgoKLS0gClRoYW5rcyEKCkJSIC8gdmoK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 11:27:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515C116A415 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8B543D5E for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:26:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1016375wxc for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:27:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=J6sS2MFngno7m/eWcg64WeSqT5bUsFZhfN13wcxdjNIeCOkqU0/n+Sv5bEpt43+T6cZMekYZsq9kr0d8Jh/Ox/4fX86z5ECQxUao9kEyNMYKdvb7vASpVOfxOwtY/WpuPaqc8vLYY5cyBamdKnxDOCe01M6xBM+pwxhwQoHSUak= Received: by 10.100.119.14 with SMTP id r14mr1362239anc.1164454064464; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:27:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:27:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611250327o39f92221le167e3e5a801b722@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:27:44 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Frank Staals" In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611231434rbccc96eq855d195ebf8b9713@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611230634j6bcff387r14d1d8912e3a208c@mail.gmail.com> <4565EBCF.8080008@gmx.net> <2cd0a0da0611231434rbccc96eq855d195ebf8b9713@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help... Installing from Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:27:46 -0000 On 11/23/06, VeeJay wrote: > > > > On 11/23/06, Frank Staals wrote: > > > > VeeJay wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > If I will install Apache2 from the Port, how can I configure to add > > > module > > > or disable modules? > > > Like if I want to enable following modules, how can I do them VIA > > Ports? > > > Please find below the text from this Step-by-Step guide I am using. > > > But that > > > procedure is for manually downloading the archive, checking signatures > > > and > > > then configuring.... > > > > > > But how can I use Port system to get the same results? > > > > > > > > make install > > > > > > chown -R root:sys /usr/local/apache2 > > > > > > > > > ----------------- > > > > > > If we can configure in Port, so where it could be done and how? and if > > > its > > > in a file, where it would be placed? > > > > > > > go to the apache2 dir in your portstree ( generally > > /usr/ports/www/apache2/ ) run 'make config' to set options, if the > > specific options aren't there: copy the Makefile to Makefile.orig and > > add the '--enable-OPTION' and '--disable-OPTION' with the other compile > > > > options. > > > > Not sure though: but aren't a lot of those options also settable in the > > apache config file ? it might be a better idea to check that out first, > > so if you ever change your mind about a setting you don't have to > > recompile your intire apache2 port. > > > > -- > > -Frank Staals > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > > > > > Hi > > When I give "make config" command I get error as follow: > > # make config > ===> No options to configure > > > I have also tried --enable-OPTION and --disable-OPTION... > > but didn't had any luck.... :( > > -- > Thanks! > > BR / vj > Hi How about to write like this? make WITHOUT_MODULES="charset-lite include env setenvif status autoindex asis cgi negotiation imap actions userdir alias so" WITH_MODULES="mpm=prefork access auth log_config mime dir" And after compiling with above command, I am getting this error when running apache # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf: Invalid command 'Order', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration Even though I have added access, auth modules already.... in the make command... Please help!!! -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 11:31:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A1516A407 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586CE43D67 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:30:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1016852wxc for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:31:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Dgajz55nmsnNaQodVYabFU1igj+D8dkYI15DAqBUgqnPO5yAJ6jfVi6tBo01zAT8RFtw5Bml69giBJDGbcueyTt8dkXJY+keublGTznXAFFUN1Y14+QqdySaimnf4h7I2UHsVQSOfxEkwk+sXIBYe4xWTUOKPN0zFvm0d8UD8og= Received: by 10.100.197.15 with SMTP id u15mr1546680anf.1164454301565; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:31:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611250331h58507128od62901d92dcaf3b2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:31:41 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Apache port compile error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:31:45 -0000 Hi When compiling apache20 from ports and enabling/diabling knobs, I am writing the make command as follow; #make WITHOUT_MODULES="charset-lite include env setenvif status autoindex asis cgi negotiation imap actions userdir alias so" WITH_MODULES="mpm=prefork access auth log_config mime dir" #make install And after compiling with above command, I am getting this error when running apache # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf: Invalid command 'Order', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration Even though I have added "access, auth" modules already.... in the make command... Please help!!! -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 11:51:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3A716A417 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:51:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30BAF43D68 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:50:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2006 11:51:08 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (EHLO [192.168.5.5]) [62.59.173.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 25 Nov 2006 12:51:08 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25365336 Message-ID: <45682E2E.4040907@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:51:10 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graham Bentley References: <20061124120100.334D516A670@hub.freebsd.org> <000901c70fc6$8641d0f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> In-Reply-To: <000901c70fc6$8641d0f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Working at Console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:51:14 -0000 Graham Bentley wrote: > Hi All, > > I am interested in setting up a text based / console system. > > So far I have learnt how to recompile the kernel and get > 1024x768 console. I have 'mc' loaded because I am > familiar with that. And of course sendmail is already sending > mail. Then there is elinks for web ... > > What other apps are people using / recommend for other > tasks on this type of system for ; > > Email (mutt, pine, other?) > Word Processing > Music CD > MP3 > CD Writing > Screen ? > > and any other usefull programs that replace their X equivs ? > > Thanks ! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > To play mp3's from commandline I usually just use mplayer, but you might also want to check out musicpd allthough that might be a little to drastic for what you want. For cd-writing I use the burncd command, it comes with the cdrecord port. If you allready had some (gui) progam to burn cd's you can count on it you allready have cdrecord installed :) For IM-programs ( don't know if you use them ) you might want to check out irssi + bitlbee -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 16:03:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EB716A4FC for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:03:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A10043E4D for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:00:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from e180066179.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.180.66.179] helo=pubbox.net) by pubbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GnzxG-0005Jb-A1; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:00:38 +0100 Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:00:51 +0100 From: Armin Arh To: service Message-ID: <20061125160051.GA761@pubbox.net> References: <4567C6EF.4040008@fixer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4567C6EF.4040008@fixer.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: arminius@pubbox.net Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packages failing to load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:03:28 -0000 Look for a package called 'expat-2.0.0'. Once you got one look into it like this pkg_info -L expat-2.X.tar.gz It should then state there is a '/usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6' in it. If so, install it. Nevertheless this may fail if it uses some syscall of FBSD-5.5 not present in FBSD5.4, but i don't think so. If all that fails, compile it yourself, like this: cd /usr/ports/textproc/expat2 make install && make clean I have FreeBSD-6.2 running, but without expat2. My packages still use expat1. Simply because i built every bit from ports, to have no braindamage with precompiled stuff wanting newest libraries. Looks like this on my Desktop: ---------------- armin@lance pkg_info -L /var/db/pkg/expat-1.95.8_3/ Information for expat-1.95.8_3: Files: /usr/local/man/man1/xmlwf.1.gz /usr/local/bin/xmlwf /usr/local/include/expat.h /usr/local/include/expat_external.h /usr/local/lib/libexpat.a /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.5 armin@lance ldconfig -r |grep expat 438:-lexpat.5 => /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.5 680:-lexpat.4 => /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.4 armin@lance uname -a FreeBSD lance.net.schlund.de 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #8: Sun Nov 12 21:59:06 CET 2006 god@lance.net.schlund.de:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/LANCE i386 ---------------- bye, Armin -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer. Free email addresses at http://pubbox.net/ On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:30:39PM -0700, service wrote: > uname -a > FreeBSD localhost 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 24 > 08:54:35 UTC 2006 root@:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/VIL i386 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I had FreeBSD-5.4 for about one and a half years. Loading packages with > "pkg_add -r" was very easy. Suddenly "pkg_add -r" no longer works. > > Looking at freebsd's ftp sites, they got rid of the 5.4 release. They > now have a 5.5 release. I tried downloading from "packages-5-stable" > and "packages-5.5-stable". About 50 percent of these programs fail. I > get error messages that say something like "/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: > Shared object "libexpat.so.6" not found". I'm not sure, but I think > files ending in "so.6", belong in version 6, not version 5. I have more > than 10 versions of FreeBSD. I tried using packages off these CDs. > some of them worked, but most of the time I keep getting error messages. > > What can I do? > > Thanks in advance, > bruce > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 16:12:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2AF16A4FE for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from mar.ukrtel.net (mar.ukrtel.net [195.5.6.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743A643D88 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:09:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from 147-78-124-91.pool.ukrtel.net ([91.124.78.147] helo=localhost.my.domain) by mar.ukrtel.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Go06n-00058w-FL; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:10:29 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAPGASi1008821; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:10:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: (from elisej@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6/Submit) id kAPGAS9W008820; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:10:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:10:28 +0200 From: a@zeos.net To: Graham Bentley Message-ID: <20061125161027.GA560@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: Graham Bentley , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061124120100.334D516A670@hub.freebsd.org> <000901c70fc6$8641d0f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000901c70fc6$8641d0f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Working at Console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:12:43 -0000 On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 12:46:12PM -0000, Graham Bentley wrote: > Hi All, > > I am interested in setting up a text based / console system. > > So far I have learnt how to recompile the kernel and get > 1024x768 console. I have 'mc' loaded because I am > familiar with that. And of course sendmail is already sending > mail. Then there is elinks for web ... > > What other apps are people using / recommend for other > tasks on this type of system for ; > > Email (mutt, pine, other?) I can recommend you mutt-ng (mutt next generation, ports/mail/mutt-ng). I use Mutt-ng devel-r804 (based on Mutt 1.5.11/2005-09-15) now. Elisej Babenko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 16:16:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6946716A403 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8372543E51 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:13:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so807766uge for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:13:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=J3bSRWRxTz+Sbjk/P1qH1vT6PFLhaesXQ2GGNXAMZDi0r29PhxcLfuQmB4IYXG77Db/ORJwOdPM0CqHsm61xO3mYUqpUTf5Xm+S0Frz5QfrqXGeWFC/YIVR1GHRj/EhAgUcqKSapqgyy3sCE+JlpTA2wZf+4S90p8Oia5ZHRA7s= Received: by 10.66.232.9 with SMTP id e9mr9127206ugh.1164471202658; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:13:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.255.10 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:13:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0611250813l73dd6dabjc22b15ebefbf0f3d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:13:22 +0300 From: "John Smith" To: "probsd org" In-Reply-To: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd desktop | mozilla X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:16:57 -0000 On 11/25/06, probsd org wrote: > I'm a long time proponent of FreeBSD as a server. For a long time I've really wanted a FreeBSD system as a desktop. So, I decided to install the FreeBSD 6.2 and compile xorg, gnome, mozilla, etc... to give it a whirl. > > For anyone reading this, who wants the same thing. > > DO NOT DO IT. Nothing works. java is borked, mozilla and firefox are borked, gnome is ify.... ugh. > > Just dont do it. As a server, I highly recommend it... but it isn't ready for the desktop. > If you don't know how to setup it, just got for DesktopBSD, or PC-BSD 1.3 Beta. Thank you, -J From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 16:37:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A3D16A47B for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5023843DC0 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:35:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAPGaOgb071003; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:36:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <45687103.9080502@daleco.biz> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:36:19 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060925 SeaMonkey/1.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: probsd org References: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd desktop | mozilla X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:37:25 -0000 probsd org wrote: > I'm a long time proponent of FreeBSD as a server. For a long time I've really wanted a FreeBSD system as a desktop. So, I decided to install the FreeBSD 6.2 and compile xorg, gnome, mozilla, etc... to give it a whirl. > > For anyone reading this, who wants the same thing. > > DO NOT DO IT. Nothing works. java is borked, mozilla and firefox are borked, gnome is ify.... ugh. > > Just dont do it. As a server, I highly recommend it... but it isn't ready for the desktop. > Hi. I don't want to offend, but I may. For starters, I'm not sure if that what you were trying to do or not. Basically, it sounds like just another person who gave up before finding what the rest of us see as Nirvana. Whatever, here's my mini-rant: Since when is the FreeBSD Project responsible for the software of Sun Microsystems and the Mozilla Foundation? (And, incidentally, I've not had too many issues with FireFox, Mozilla, or Java. My Flash is borked ATM, but I'm not blaming Macromedia or the FreeBSD project, I'm just waiting until I have time to sort it out again). I think the key words above are "give it a whirl". That's not what you do. You make a conscious decision to jettison some other option in favor of FreeBSD on the desktop, and then you do it. It's somewhat demanding. It sometimes takes a while to get right. It even requires revisiting now and again. My parents aren't quite up to the task, for example. Is it worth it? I think it is for me, now (2 years later). Many people will tell their 'old' hardware "hasta la Vista" ;-) in the next several months, but I won't. If I want new hardware, I'll get it, but not because my software says I have to. Furthermore, I have had many of their so-called "advanced features" on my desktop computers for a long time, and I didn't have to contribute to the Gates foundation for any of them. And I've got other desktop machines in my office (and some of my clients' offices) with no MSFT tax on them either. And if I want another desktop made from junk I buy from Ebay or find in my closets, I'll have it, and a combination of software that will most likely work on it. I don't have to give substantial portions of my income to hardware vendors, because I have access to a system that will still work on a Pentium II, if I desire to use one. FreeBSD configuration isn't "fire and forget" for servers (although its daily operation very well *could* be), so why should it be that way with a graphical interface? If anything, "RTFM" is much more important when attempting to create a GUI environment. Problem is, FreeBSD isn't responsible for the majority of the GUI software, so you end up with a bit of "hodgepodge research" to do. The FreeBSD Handbook has some information on basic configuration, but for the million+one combinations that people want as a desktop, you kinda have to search for your answers. (Linux experience might be handy there, heh.) I'm not calling you names or attempting to insult you in any way. I wish you luck with whatever OS you use on your desktop. For the sake of humanity, I hope it's a Free OS. Gee, the script found a good quote for the .sig: Kevin Kinsey -- Maryann's Law: You can always find what you're not looking for. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 16:45:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE5816A412 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7556643D4C for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAPGjSRc023752 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:45:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id kAPGjRxm023749 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:45:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:45:27 -0500 (EST) From: doug To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200611250049.53630.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Message-ID: <20061125105618.I16448@fledge.watson.org> References: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> <200611250049.53630.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: freebsd desktop | mozilla X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:45:29 -0000 On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, RW wrote: > On Friday 24 November 2006 23:41, probsd org wrote: >> I'm a long time proponent of FreeBSD as a server. For a long time I've >> really wanted a FreeBSD system as a desktop. So, I decided to install the >> FreeBSD 6.2 and compile xorg, gnome, mozilla, etc... to give it a whirl. >> >> For anyone reading this, who wants the same thing. >> >> DO NOT DO IT. Nothing works. java is borked, mozilla and firefox are >> borked, gnome is ify.... ugh. >> >> Just dont do it. As a server, I highly recommend it... but it isn't >> ready for the desktop. > > It works for me. You must have screwed-up. > _______________________________________________ I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop since 3.5 or 4.0 (I forget). To any new users, it is well worth a try. When I was using circa 1995 hardware it was somewhat of a challange, but not any worse than DOS in the 80's or IBM in the 70's. First it is pretty easy to try and if you want a complete system you can check out http://www.desktopbsd.net. Until my current laptop I never had enough resources to make desktopbsd an option, even if it had existed. If you are running a FreeBSD server or plan to, getting FreeBSD running as your desktop will expand your knowledge of FreeBSD and Unix in general. For me (old mainframe guy) this was invaluable. Everything you learn on the Desktop side will make you a better sysadmin. X is the great leveler. Unless you are an X windows developer, when it does not work its a PROBLEM. With new hardware it mostly seems to work. But Xorg/XFree86 is a constant. Running any BSD/Linux your problems will for the most part follow the hardware. Linux may have more/better(?) drivers but running Linux will not help you learn FreeBSD. The other thing that may be problematic is, as the author of this thread indicates, java. However I happily run Firefox, Thunderbird and OpenOffice all without installing java. I am sure it can be done, it is just not high on my list. There is a lot of help to be had but you have to ask. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 16:59:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FAB16A403 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:59:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B0243D46 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:58:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [10.35.4.65] (65.4-35-10-static.chueca.wifi [10.35.4.65]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F362E037 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:59:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <456875F3.8040908@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:57:23 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060005000904010709010702" Cc: Subject: ACPI: Standby, sleep, suspend and resume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:59:27 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060005000904010709010702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi: I have the following sysctl parameters: hw.acpi.supported_sleep_state: S3 S4 S5 hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S3 hw.acpi.lid_switch_state: NONE hw.acpi.standby_state: S1 hw.acpi.suspend_state: S3 hw.acpi.sleep_delay: 1 First, I'd like that the screen is switched off when the lid closes, so I assume that I should set hw.acpi.lid_switch_state to something, but I don't know what. Second: Is there a way to manually toggle the sleep state so I can create a menu item "sleep" or "standby"? Last: When the laptop goes into some suspend mode - I don't know which - I don't know how to bring it back alive except for rebooting. What is the secret key combination? (typically). Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org --------------ms060005000904010709010702 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIK6DCC BXAwggRYoAMCAQICBEVUK6IwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwMTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNV BAoTA1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0EwHhcNMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WhcNMDgxMTE1 MDkwMTU0WjB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEpMCcGA1UEChMgSW5nZW4gb3JnYW5pc2F0b3Jpc2sg dGlsa255dG5pbmcxOzAUBgNVBAMUDUVyaWsgTvhyZ2FhcmQwIwYDVQQFExxQSUQ6OTgwMi0y MDAyLTItNTQ0MzY5NzY5MzE1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC1/K6+GVcF UvoWJpyfhzWbu8qEOB8jU17A0dpmts7RT+ODkYq0lxJCcvvdSXNQQurvYwaPISA+EMRy+rIm rjhoyxhsM9w/XC7gELqkr1XbGt3wR0KLr5ZcRfD4HqrWM1Eh1OYxTXKod6Ox/FAqzDAy91x8 XCZzsHtiBCdgMSYxqwIDAQABo4ICzjCCAsowDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgP4MCsGA1UdEAQkMCKA DzIwMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WoEPMjAwODExMTUwOTAxNTRaMIIBNwYDVR0gBIIBLjCCASowggEm BgoqgVCBKQEBAQEDMIIBFjAvBggrBgEFBQcCARYjaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRr L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkwgeIGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHVMAoWA1REQzADAgEBGoHGRm9yIGFudmVuZGVs c2UgYWYgY2VydGlmaWthdGV0IGfmbGRlciBPQ0VTIHZpbGvlciwgQ1BTIG9nIE9DRVMgQ1As IGRlciBrYW4gaGVudGVzIGZyYSB3d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0b3J5LiBCZW3m cmssIGF0IFREQyBlZnRlciB2aWxr5XJlbmUgaGFyIGV0IGJlZ3LmbnNldCBhbnN2YXIgaWZ0 LiBwcm9mZXNzaW9uZWxsZSBwYXJ0ZXIuMEEGCCsGAQUFBwEBBDUwMzAxBggrBgEFBQcwAYYl aHR0cDovL29jc3AuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9vY3NwL3N0YXR1czAgBgNVHREEGTAXgRVub3Jn YWFyZEBsb2NvbG9tby5vcmcwgYQGA1UdHwR9MHswS6BJoEekRTBDMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQTEQMA4GA1UEAxMHQ1JMMTU1NzAs oCqgKIYmaHR0cDovL2NybC5vY2VzLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2Nlcy5jcmwwHwYDVR0jBBgw FoAUYLWF7FZkfhIZJ2cdUBVLc647+RIwHQYDVR0OBBYEFPd+a0ceJ9JmK934UXsB3G0mjv+f MAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwGQYJKoZIhvZ9B0EABAwwChsEVjcuMQMCA6gwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAD ggEBAE9KhX+l/ZcnhvGPhHyWnJspyCXSiuqZ+GlgMdcKXtlu8kXsqNzfDe9qSs93++zJS+HT vAW0QgyIxjY1VpgCqgyjU8e2d2D1eSRMDB09WViZk8oZkvOy0Mq3yy//CLSw3gQbXNZF+Yt+ htss+FD+idACVyRBQqlcHuaxjguyzZkK0fGBN5H5nsklDySQCU7X0i3egeIiL7zlV3cjp9KT 12tNG4jfQTaSUzBkz0R+x+Jcdyp6AI9Qg3H1iGDDI58aCTY5ohQBpDsUcLr6U842IACNCeub qDP6nDo5lnMEXwGH/RO8r4supCf5wrNRjqEX/vokUzB5QfDGtmxxZkycaaQwggVwMIIEWKAD AgECAgRFVCuiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMx FDASBgNVBAMTC1REQyBPQ0VTIENBMB4XDTA2MTExNTA4MzE1NFoXDTA4MTExNTA5MDE1NFow dTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxKTAnBgNVBAoTIEluZ2VuIG9yZ2FuaXNhdG9yaXNrIHRpbGtueXRu aW5nMTswFAYDVQQDFA1FcmlrIE74cmdhYXJkMCMGA1UEBRMcUElEOjk4MDItMjAwMi0yLTU0 NDM2OTc2OTMxNTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAtfyuvhlXBVL6Fiacn4c1 m7vKhDgfI1NewNHaZrbO0U/jg5GKtJcSQnL73UlzUELq72MGjyEgPhDEcvqyJq44aMsYbDPc P1wu4BC6pK9V2xrd8EdCi6+WXEXw+B6q1jNRIdTmMU1yqHejsfxQKswwMvdcfFwmc7B7YgQn YDEmMasCAwEAAaOCAs4wggLKMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwID+DArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDA2MTEx NTA4MzE1NFqBDzIwMDgxMTE1MDkwMTU0WjCCATcGA1UdIASCAS4wggEqMIIBJgYKKoFQgSkB AQEBAzCCARYwLwYIKwYBBQUHAgEWI2h0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0 b3J5MIHiBggrBgEFBQcCAjCB1TAKFgNUREMwAwIBARqBxkZvciBhbnZlbmRlbHNlIGFmIGNl cnRpZmlrYXRldCBn5mxkZXIgT0NFUyB2aWxr5XIsIENQUyBvZyBPQ0VTIENQLCBkZXIga2Fu IGhlbnRlcyBmcmEgd3d3LmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvcmVwb3NpdG9yeS4gQmVt5nJrLCBhdCBU REMgZWZ0ZXIgdmlsa+VyZW5lIGhhciBldCBiZWdy5m5zZXQgYW5zdmFyIGlmdC4gcHJvZmVz c2lvbmVsbGUgcGFydGVyLjBBBggrBgEFBQcBAQQ1MDMwMQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJWh0dHA6Ly9v Y3NwLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2NzcC9zdGF0dXMwIAYDVR0RBBkwF4EVbm9yZ2FhcmRAbG9j b2xvbW8ub3JnMIGEBgNVHR8EfTB7MEugSaBHpEUwQzELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNVBAoT A1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0ExEDAOBgNVBAMTB0NSTDE1NTcwLKAqoCiGJmh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwub2Nlcy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRrL29jZXMuY3JsMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFGC1hexW ZH4SGSdnHVAVS3OuO/kSMB0GA1UdDgQWBBT3fmtHHifSZivd+FF7AdxtJo7/nzAJBgNVHRME AjAAMBkGCSqGSIb2fQdBAAQMMAobBFY3LjEDAgOoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBPSoV/ pf2XJ4bxj4R8lpybKcgl0orqmfhpYDHXCl7ZbvJF7Kjc3w3vakrPd/vsyUvh07wFtEIMiMY2 NVaYAqoMo1PHtndg9XkkTAwdPVlYmZPKGZLzstDKt8sv/wi0sN4EG1zWRfmLfobbLPhQ/onQ AlckQUKpXB7msY4Lss2ZCtHxgTeR+Z7JJQ8kkAlO19It3oHiIi+85Vd3I6fSk9drTRuI30E2 klMwZM9EfsfiXHcqegCPUINx9YhgwyOfGgk2OaIUAaQ7FHC6+lPONiAAjQnrm6gz+pw6OZZz BF8Bh/0TvK+LLqQn+cKzUY6hF/76JFMweUHwxrZscWZMnGmkMYICKjCCAiYCAQEwOTAxMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJESzEMMAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojAJ BgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBRzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEP Fw0wNjExMjUxNjU3MjNaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBRgZdIGxlovl30P95utRVVveLveizBI BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxOzA5MDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMxFDASBgNVBAMT C1REQyBPQ0VTIENBAgRFVCuiMEoGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMTugOTAxMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8x RTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMC BzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASBgFu6o5qtd6le1rRMb3ZLYY6IkfO0 P8Y5nOnqHZuDirH/I6yXDkKP5tTElmZkYP6cUih7yNa9V4Yx99vy1D5VNkv3NPpKTSBTwi4A nlUYxDiaDMIM04aWrWvQhAET1EmJfV8c8N1R7faBHX0N76LakWaGoOMwtLSaXMinxf7Af84u AAAAAAAA --------------ms060005000904010709010702-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 17:01:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F76516A412 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5456243D4C for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:00:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Go0u8-0006pF-Eg; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:01:28 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAPH4Pmh051412; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:04:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kAPH4Ol8051411; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:04:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:04:19 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061124234111.5589.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611251104.23070.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79128cd2f737ab662adc592f05691bb93d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Cc: probsd org Subject: Re: freebsd desktop | mozilla X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:01:29 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 17:41, probsd org wrote: > I'm a long time proponent of FreeBSD as a server. For a long time I've > really wanted a FreeBSD system as a desktop. So, I decided to install the > FreeBSD 6.2 and compile xorg, gnome, mozilla, etc... to give it a whirl. > > For anyone reading this, who wants the same thing. > > DO NOT DO IT. Nothing works. java is borked, mozilla and firefox are > borked, gnome is ify.... ugh. > > Just dont do it. As a server, I highly recommend it... but it isn't > ready for the desktop. > > Just out of curiosity, what version of FreeBSD started you as a proponent? Is "long-time" more than, say, six months? Long enough to know how to compile a kernel? Long enough to have used portupgrade? I've been using FreeBSD productively for various combinations of server and desktop solutions since 3.4-RELEASE. I'm glad to say that I cannot claim to never having problems with FreeBSD. If that were true then I think I would never have learned anything. Thankfully the learning curve is steep, and never seems to quite level out. While I'll admit that the desktop features supported by FreeBSD are sometimes lacking, I recognize that FreeBSD does not itself provide a desktop interface. Thus for desktop issues I turn to X.org, KDE.org, or whatever project handles the feature I'm interested in. If you are actually interested in using FreeBSD on your desktop then maybe you don't know how to start. Try this: send a question to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. If this is what you feel you've done with the subject line "freebsd desktop | mozilla" then ... maybe you could rephrase the question. Something like "when I type 'mozilla' I get the error message 'BORKED!'" would be a little more helpful. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 17:26:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4003D16A47B for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C331D43E8F for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:21:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kAPHMHfP047102 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:22:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kAPHMGnc047099 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:22:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:22:16 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061125182055.N47010@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: not enough free resources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:26:10 -0000 getting such things under high load Nov 25 18:20:20 3miasto named[996]: client 193.220.192.36#36674: error sending response: not enough free resources sometimes even ping doesn't work well. what resources are missing and how to change them? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 17:59:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5201A16A403 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:59:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEE743D4C for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:58:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duncan.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so725801pyh for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:59:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=NcPX90NTl/0En0k+eG1Ob6dAAlXjeBy9MWyUyIWI0YK/W2Gd2Ky64azxLLGemNycfFLYkFaomnCHAWN5UAV1ThOIt2PW181KYvpXp7Ea0fRtfpA3YNehE8NDgzATTtdBwBkF+3zxKGPw0F620BovFHVUN2Y/BozTbDEHsFU+v1s= Received: by 10.35.79.3 with SMTP id g3mr8779971pyl.1164477547878; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:59:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.20? ( [75.7.74.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z52sm9504955pyg.2006.11.25.09.59.07; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:59:07 -0800 (PST) From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:58:04 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <2cd0a0da0611250331h58507128od62901d92dcaf3b2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611250331h58507128od62901d92dcaf3b2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611251158.04757.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: VeeJay Subject: Re: Apache port compile error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:59:09 -0000 On Saturday 25 November 2006 05:31, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > > When compiling apache20 from ports and enabling/diabling knobs, I am > writing the make command as follow; > > #make WITHOUT_MODULES="charset-lite include env setenvif status autoindex > asis cgi negotiation imap actions userdir alias so" > WITH_MODULES="mpm=prefork access auth log_config mime dir" > > #make install > > > And after compiling with above command, I am getting this error when > running apache > > > # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start > > Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf: > Invalid command 'Order', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not > included in the server configuration > > > Even though I have added "access, auth" modules already.... in the make > command... > > > Please help!!! What's on line 40, 41, and 42 of your httpd.conf? I you just want a working apache20, skip what you're doing and just do a "make install". Is there a reason that you would want to use apache20 rather than apache22? Just curious. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 18:13:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D439316A412 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B3D43D55 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:13:56 -0500 id 00056407.456887E5.0001572F Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:13:55 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Wojciech Puchar Message-Id: <20061125131355.935eb267.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20061125182055.N47010@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20061125182055.N47010@chylonia.3miasto.net> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: not enough free resources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:13:58 -0000 On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:22:16 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > getting such things under high load > > Nov 25 18:20:20 3miasto named[996]: client 193.220.192.36#36674: error > sending response: not enough free resources > > > sometimes even ping doesn't work well. > > what resources are missing and how to change them? Check the output of 'netstat -m' to see if there are any clues as to what is being starved. Once you know, it shouldn't be too hard to figure out how to increase it. -Bill From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 18:58:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3900C16A40F for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:58:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from strbenjr@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp106.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F29BC43D72 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:57:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from strbenjr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 29237 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2006 18:58:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ij465jyt62AU4u7mTIPatfwhNBDDTZ2hal7X5at0n7Jjb7BXYUBBKDG1GZ91q2f27no8+7HjWnLJXGAIKW+Ai708UtfnH2B255CLF5kazFHkDmiTx8Qtr1CYJPNg56keRZ1uqdSyurnxF1qS/XkxmVRjzgzJgH5M6bX8MlPKkbI= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.7.202?) (strbenjr@69.143.49.135 with plain) by smtp106.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2006 18:58:35 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: f4jjetQVM1m045Y9U0fUm0xc64uJcXFfx8RmDi_FV2X1.6xlQhebtraOdRr0T0ln3niOTMd9Q.UpLOoTPB4JbnTHP0t0X70YKonL7eVcz.5Rfj67oUIEqw-- Message-ID: <4568924B.1010409@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:58:19 -0500 From: Ben Hacker Jr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060702) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions FBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Configuring a CDROM (PCGA-CD51) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:58:40 -0000 Hello, Any help will be greatly appreciated! I am not subscribed to this list so please reply directly in addition to replying to the list. I am trying to configure a PCCard based CD-ROM device (PCGA-CD51). Much detail on where I am with this can be found at: http://bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=45766 I am running: $ uname -a FreeBSD sony.family.hom 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Nov 22 06: 11:34 EST 2006 user@sony.family.hom:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SONY01 i386 $ dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Nov 22 06:11:34 EST 2006 user@sony.family.hom:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SONY01 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Transmeta(tm) Crusoe(tm) Processor TM5800 (860.17-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineTMx86" Id = 0x543 Stepping = 3 Features=0x84893f real memory = 117440512 (112 MB) avail memory = 105250816 (100 MB) Crusoe LongRun support enabled, current mode: 2 <867MHz 1300mV 100%> kbd1 at kbdmux0... I found a few messages about this (a similar) drive but they were back in 1999 . Any help to help to get this drive recognized will be greatly appreciated!! -- Ben Hacker, Jr. Network Systems Administrator strbenjr {at} yahoo.com ben_hacker {at} inter-op.net 703.987.1816 (c) -- -- -- http://www.coeba.org http://www.inter-op.net Lottery Video ( http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=1419445n ) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 19:14:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ABB16A412 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from que_deseja@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s15.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s15.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A3543D46 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:13:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from que_deseja@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.162.39]) by bay0-omc1-s15.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:14:28 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:14:28 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.162.200 by by108fd.bay108.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:14:27 GMT X-Originating-IP: [67.191.45.191] X-Originating-Email: [que_deseja@hotmail.com] X-Sender: que_deseja@hotmail.com From: "Desmond Chapman" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:14:27 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Nov 2006 19:14:28.0524 (UTC) FILETIME=[EDA936C0:01C710C5] Subject: sound/ irq X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:14:29 -0000 How do I reset the IRQ to load the soundriver at boot time without using the command line? I have to do this at boot: (root login) pwd cd /usr/src grep ALC658 sys/dev/sound/pcm/ac97.c (the sound card is loaded) Then: kldload snd_driver And I get the following output: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled pcm0: mem 0xfe02a000-0xfe02a0ff irq 17 at device 20.5 on pci0 pcm0: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled Once again, what can I do to fix this? Obrigado "Thanks" in advance for any positive feedback. _________________________________________________________________ Fixing up the home? Live Search can help http://imagine-windowslive.com/search/kits/default.aspx?kit=improve&locale=en-US&source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=WLMTAG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 21:00:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA8016A412 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:00:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5BA43D55 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:59:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1106042wxc for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:00:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=W2yW3L3iDplsy+Os8dFn8qd2YZrtxcgWHnmyl4gZBv7mFsFsEveuPkMpvuRLssD9CnYqmUG+nkugD2THXQKqsd0q+xGTLApKgL+keIGbYPQAd+upY0W4gxpTMdxcEMN/px8OlA91mwO3B3OfYmR3OnZ8cwwkOE296pjIHZcT/nY= Received: by 10.100.167.7 with SMTP id p7mr1308531ane.1164488438624; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:00:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:00:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611251300k36182b13gefd350a38ecebc81@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:00:38 +0100 From: VeeJay To: FreeBSD-Questions , maanjee@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Help! make syntax errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:00:40 -0000 Hi When compiling apache20 from ports and enabling/diabling knobs, I am writing the make command as follow; #make WITHOUT_MODULES=" charset-lite include env setenvif status autoindex asis cgi negotiation imap actions userdir alias so" WITH_MODULES="mpm=prefork access auth log_config mime dir" #make install And after compiling with above command, I am getting this error when running apache # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf: Invalid command 'Order', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration Even though I have added "access, auth" modules already.... in the make command... Please help!!! -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 21:56:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3379E16A415 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861DB43D55 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:55:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1113861wxc for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:56:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Xs/9lNnJ7R7GbbI81Gkln+sX59eKjkKIU2OMYzYLKoO+mrL2qTFa20YbNAya9hJ/eWAQRDEtMzRqJBvlCFf6AMKA6fz01vgNyRuiSKgMeNKez+fM1BKAbPp0/iEj3+qR0ztqspqDEtcHJQbXoZN0oTC7CF4oTN6y0SPf1Da6f/Q= Received: by 10.100.131.6 with SMTP id e6mr1340683and.1164491763768; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:56:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:56:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0611251356o75c12cabq52384e049a00f496@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:56:03 +0100 From: VeeJay To: FreeBSD-Questions , maanjee@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611251300k36182b13gefd350a38ecebc81@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0611251300k36182b13gefd350a38ecebc81@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Help! make syntax errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:56:07 -0000 On 11/25/06, VeeJay wrote: > > Hi > > > When compiling apache20 from ports and enabling/diabling knobs, I am > writing the make command as follow; > > #make WITHOUT_MODULES=" charset-lite include env setenvif status autoindex > asis cgi negotiation imap actions userdir alias so" > WITH_MODULES="mpm=prefork access auth log_config mime dir" > > #make install > > > And after compiling with above command, I am getting this error when > running apache > > > # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start > > Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf: > Invalid command 'Order', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not > included in the server configuration > > > Even though I have added "access, auth" modules already.... in the make > command... > > > Please help!!! > > > > -- > Thanks! > > BR / vj When I give this command so, I DON'T get required modules in the list, see results: # httpd -l Compiled in modules: core.c prefork.c http_core.c mod_so.c # Thanks for your time.... -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 22:07:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9B416A403 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ranger@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from mail2.hosting-advantage.com (mail2.hosting-advantage.com [64.92.122.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6FD443D6E for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Ranger@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: (qmail 26706 invoked by uid 100); 25 Nov 2006 22:07:46 -0000 Received: from 65-19-227-178.vnet-inc.com (65-19-227-178.vnet-inc.com [65.19.227.178]) by webmails.hosting-advantage.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:07:46 -0800 Message-ID: <20061125140746.hnu3zduwmc8cw4oo@webmails.hosting-advantage.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:07:46 -0800 From: Ranger@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: Plaintext Version of Message X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: old modem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:07:50 -0000 Greetings to all, I just upgraded my old IBM 300PL from FreeBSD 4.2 -> FreeBSD 6.1.=A0 Everything works, as before EXCEPT my old USRobotics 33.6 modem (with jumpers). =A0 6.1 doesn?t seem to find or recognize the modem.=A0 It is set to com1, IRQ4. =A0 KPPP finds the modem sometimes, like after a complete powerdown then restart ? but does not initialize it or dial the numbers. What I?m wondering is if this modem is too old for 6.1 to deal with.=A0 And, if so, what kind of modem is BEST for 6.1. =A0 I know this would be a question for ?newbies? but alas, ?newbies? does not exist now-a-days. =A0 Please help, and thank you in advance. =A0 Ciao, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 22:03:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E48316A40F for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:03:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from opbc@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from trinity.vnet-inc.com (matrix.vnet-inc.com [216.129.224.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8F143D75 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:02:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from opbc@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.vnet-inc.com [127.0.0.1]) by trinity.vnet-inc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408B35A45AA9 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:03:23 -0700 (MST) Received: from trinity.vnet-inc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (matrix.vnet-inc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30891-03 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:03:22 -0700 (MST) Received: from elijah (65-19-227-178.vnet-inc.com [65.19.227.178]) by trinity.vnet-inc.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C30C45A42CC5 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:03:20 -0700 (MST) From: "opbc" To: Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:06:34 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at vnet-inc.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:39:15 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: old modem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:03:25 -0000 Greetings to all, I just upgraded my old IBM 300PL from FreeBSD 4.2 -> FreeBSD 6.1. Everything works, as before EXCEPT my old USRobotics 33.6 modem (with jumpers). 6.1 doesn’t seem to find or recognize the modem. It is set to com1, IRQ4. KPPP finds the modem sometimes, like after a complete powerdown then restart – but does not initialize it or dial the numbers. What I’m wondering is if this modem is too old for 6.1 to deal with. And, if so, what kind of modem is BEST for 6.1. I know this would be a question for “newbies” but alas, “newbies” does not exist now-a-days. Please help, and thank you in advance. Ciao, Wade Hampton Visit our website below: Old Paths Internet Bible Ministry