Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:47:11 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What Happens When /proc is not Mounted in FreeBSD5.4?
Message-ID:  <20070201204711.GA74432@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <200702012026.l11KQ0Ia013574@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
References:  <200702012026.l11KQ0Ia013574@dc.cis.okstate.edu>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:26:00PM -0600, Martin McCormick wrote:
> Kris Kennaway writes:
> > As you have found, proc is almost entirely unused in FreeBSD apart
> > from one or two debugging facilities, and in fact not recommended on
> > multi-user systems because the long history of security
> > vulnerabilities.
>=20
> 	Thanks to you and Fabian Keil for your succinct answers.
> I took it back off and commented out the line I added to
> /etc/fstab so it can be brought back temporarily when needed but
> isn't just sitting there waiting for lightning to strike.

You could also leave it in fstab with the noauto option so it can be
easily mounted with mount /proc if needed.

Kris

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFwlHPWry0BWjoQKURAnTIAKDNnXvERiYXSVD1AftYNLjbVIVraACgsO3h
YhokiDcftJABZSuBrmHv+2w=
=jpWR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070201204711.GA74432>