From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 01:31:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D1316A4CE; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 01:31:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from lap.dougb.net (c-24-130-160-161.we.client2.attbi.com [24.130.160.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A22343D39; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 01:31:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lap.dougb.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2R9VPi2000851; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 01:31:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 01:31:25 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Ade Lovett In-Reply-To: <20040324233542.05280110@reaper.lovett.com> Message-ID: <20040327013004.A844@ync.qbhto.arg> References: <406261F0.5010800@fillmore-labs.com> <20040324233542.05280110@reaper.lovett.com> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist ports/devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 09:31:32 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Ade Lovett wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:27:59 +0100 > Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > libltdl, USE_LIBTOOL, lt_dlopen(), life, the universe and everything > > and then condense it again so it will fit in the porter's handbook > > somewhere, but it might take some time - I suck at writing concise > > documentation. :) > > FWIW, under the new world order, the generation and installation > (through libtool) of .la files will become the default ON, with a > specific knob to turn them off. > > I count about 3,600 inodes (rough guess) of .la files (assuming an > entire ports tree install, and with some very crud math), vs. the > apparent usefulness of these files, not only for the "plugin thing", but > also increasingly for IDE's. To me, this discussion is leading to the following conclusions: 1. The committer's handbook should describe why the .la files are useful, and state clearly that they should be preserved in the ports. 2. None of the ports tools (such as portlint) should suggest otherwise. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection