From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 17 09:29:36 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA29190 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 17 May 1996 09:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.barrnet.net (mail.barrnet.net [131.119.246.7]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA29180 for ; Fri, 17 May 1996 09:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silver.sms.fi (silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.1]) by mail.barrnet.net (8.7.5/MAIL-RELAY-LEN) with ESMTP id JAA12315 for ; Fri, 17 May 1996 09:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from pete@localhost) by silver.sms.fi (8.7.5/8.6.9) id TAA09668; Fri, 17 May 1996 19:26:28 +0300 (EET DST) Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 19:26:28 +0300 (EET DST) Message-Id: <199605171626.TAA09668@silver.sms.fi> From: Petri Helenius To: "John S. Dyson" Cc: bmah@cs.berkeley.edu, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 In-Reply-To: <199604222258.RAA01919@dyson.iquest.net> References: <199604222046.NAA08896@premise.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <199604222258.RAA01919@dyson.iquest.net> Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- John S. Dyson writes: > Should we (someone) create an IPv6 tree? It might be premature, but also > it allows users to play with it. I guess the problem is mostly person-power. > Definetly. Look at: http://www.join.uni-muenster.de/JOIN/ipv6/texte-englisch/budapest.html ...if you are in doubt where IPv6 is. Pete -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2i Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQCVAwUBMZyorzgkMdd4emfhAQHEOAP/V0fauLELbLk4PqyS2Q6Q6qMxcKbzaybP 7KPy91E6uTGwOiv6Fo6dIkdm4VGreatON5/FkR3tH5QmBaUfjPOnCKKfdpoM/OgS vW7/6guIKb/mVOl8UuRbtGf5h0Xv371mw1TxAoU8WZ+SZVxmx716exLMIUqwLTri ZIHx+CMKepE= =A3ns -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----