Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:13:13 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041103161232.64869E-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0411031845440.1747@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > In message <Pine.BSF.4.53.0411031818150.1747@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" writes: > > > > >I think it's overkill to enable all verbose msgs just to see link state > > >messages in my logs again when someone fiddles at the cabling in the > > >colo hotel where he shouldn't - or did I mis-read the commit message ? > > > > Link states are visible with ifconfig(8). > > of course they are but who will notify me or write them to my logs so I > have timestamps ? Do I need to write a small daemon to regularly and > fast enough poll for link state changes now ? If the information provided by "route monitor" isn't sufficiently useful and detailed (i.e., easily parsable) we should make it more useful, I think. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041103161232.64869E-100000>