Date: Sun, 07 Apr 1996 14:53:07 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, gibbs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NO_PACKAGE and NO_CDROM Message-ID: <5197.828913987@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Apr 1996 14:04:08 PDT." <199604072104.OAA29394@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * Anyone object to the idea of ports-{foo,bar,...} going away and being
> * replaced by one ports-all? Does anyone here even sup a partial
> * ports tree? I know that I never have..
>
> Seems like this is working now, is it "official"? Should I go fix the
> sample supfiles and the one on wcarchive?
>
> Satoshi
Well, I'm still not convinced that people are keen to have the
individual ones go away, in which case ports-all just becomes an added
convenience rather than a replacement.
Any last screams before I nuke ports-!all ?
Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5197.828913987>