From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 16 00:07:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566B716A401; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428EC13C441; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204831A4D81; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:07:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 523C9515C7; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:07:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:07:06 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Gerald Pfeifer Message-ID: <20070216000705.GA46652@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200702071240.l17CejrY022978@repoman.freebsd.org> <1170852496.41102.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <1171241237.7869.11.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20070212015642.GA75491@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Dirk Meyer , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Pav Lucistnik , Kris Kennaway , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: lang/gcc{33, 34, 40, 41, 42, 43} and loss of /usr/bin/objformat (was: cvs commit: ports/devel/gnustep-make Makefile) X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:07:07 -0000 On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 01:01:52AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > If things go according to my current schedule, lang/gcc41, lang/gcc42 and > > lang/gcc43 should be fixed properly (i.e. upstream and in the ports) within > > less than a week for the C and Fortran frontends; Java is more complex and > > may take a bit longer. > > Since this may affect many of you, let me provide a status update: > > lang/gcc33, lang/gcc34, and lang/gcc40 which are not maintained upstream > any longer now received a one-off patch by yours truely. > > I have also patches GCC 4.2 and GCC 4.3 upstream and updated lang/gcc42 > accordingly. > > lang/gcc43 will follow within 48 hours. Upstream GCC 4.1 and lang/gcc41 > will follow by next Tuesday. Thanks. > Older versions of GCC in our ports tree should be removed rather sooner > than later. They have served us well, but it's due time to say Good Bye. Yeah, the problem is that quite a few ports still require them. I guess they should be deprecated with enough grace period to give any remaining users the chance to step up and fix the code to work with newer gccs. Kris