Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Jul 1999 19:33:49 +0200
From:      Achim Patzner <ap@bnc.net>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: securelevel and ipfw zero
Message-ID:  <19990727193349.K58970@bnc.net>
In-Reply-To: <199907271712.LAA25861@mt.sri.com>; from Nate Williams on Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 11:12:25AM -0600
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907262255510.35843-100000@janus.syracuse.net> <199907270307.UAA49737@apollo.backplane.com> <199907271712.LAA25861@mt.sri.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 11:12:25AM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> How do you figure?  Currently, the kernel will quit 'logging' denied
> packets when the counter reaches a specific (compiled-in) number.
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Then what is

net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit: 0

made for and why does it help changing it? 8-)

It might also be nicer to give it its own facility for syslog...


Achim


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990727193349.K58970>