From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 27 17:53:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF4816A4DD for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEC043D66 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:52:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b36so313347pyb for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:52:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cOP30t0Ky1NoeETg3C9l0hu0QbVhI9ElxvknIBF2t5dWovMg2FcztMrMjHjGC8udDcCFyYFGaEgNcc+3lJH1gkfO8Q2Hs+rBjKPK1/BFNShkI+s87RVw9euR7GMqd3632kUyVY0UnmHJOzBtKIx1wFCi6IeX5d4OCjoPHAaleX0= Received: by 10.35.61.14 with SMTP id o14mr13508914pyk; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.16.20 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:52:50 -0700 From: "Kip Macy" To: "Daniel Eischen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: David Xu , freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a couple of issues with libthr X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kmacy@fsmware.com List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:53:04 -0000 I don't think re-building diablo-jdk15 is an option. Installing the port consists of pulling down a pre-built tarball and accepting a license. -Kip On 7/27/06, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Kip Macy wrote: > > > I'm running -CURRENT as of yesterday. > > > > The function thr_set_name is only defined in libc.so.7, so as far as I > > can tell the only way to get java to work on current with libthr is by > > mapping libc.so.6 to libc.so.7. The function thr_set_name is only used > > by libthr, so libthr seems like a *much* smarter place to put it. > > No, the problem is that libthr (and libpthread, libc_r probably > too) need a version bump but haven't been bumped yet. That > will happen, but we need some more time to address some related > issues and whether all the other libraries need bumping too. > As always in -current, you may need to rebuild ports. In this > case, you need to rebuild java so it will link to libc.so.7, > not libc.so.6. > > -- > DE >