From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 21 00:25:06 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EF016A415;
	Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:25:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:25:00 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <17718.20457.799395.602805@gromit.timing.com>
	<20061019100442.GN55428@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20061019100442.GN55428@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200610210825.00228.davidxu@freebsd.org>
Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, stable@freebsd.org,
	John E Hein <jhein@timing.com>, jhb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: locked vnode / nfs... requires kill -9 in ddb
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:25:07 -0000

On Thursday 19 October 2006 18:04, Kostik Belousov wrote:

>
> The nfs_reply is sleeping with the PCATCH set. The question is why SIGTSTP
> does not cause msleep to return with EINTR.

I have not been tracking the thread. but if the thread is sleeping with
PCATCH, the SIGTSTP should cause the process to stop unless the signal
is masked by sigprocmask or the signal has an action handler been set, 
this is  a correct behavior.

David Xu