Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:49:16 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Control-Z the Sleep Signal Message-ID: <4a2f738c.vK%2B04C2hzxx8edYV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <200906100204.n5A24J97018545@dc.cis.okstate.edu> References: <200906100204.n5A24J97018545@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu> wrote: > Thanks to all. In this case, I made SIGTSTP have the > same effect in the program that CTRL-C does (SIGINT) so now > either signal makes the application remove the lock and quit > gracefully. To each his own, I guess. To anyone familiar with the usual Unix/Linux conventions, this response to ^Z is going to be thoroughly unexpected. Is there any reasonable way to do only the minimum cleanup need for the lock to be safely removed, and then suspend, reacquiring the lock when resumed?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4a2f738c.vK%2B04C2hzxx8edYV%perryh>