Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 14:06:04 -0700 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/imap-uw Makefile ports/mail/imap-uw/filesmd5 ports/mail/imap-uw/patches patch-ab patch-aaports/mail/imap-uw/pkg PLIST ports/mail/imap-uw/scripts configure Message-ID: <199706032106.OAA01032@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Jun 1997 03:22:55 %2B0900." <199706031822.DAA29918@bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Max,
The original developer is a relatively sane human being (well, he's not, but
he has some sanity when it comes to coding...)
There is no way in hell that he will mess up his pretty and portable makefiles
with our shared library kludges.
Paul
From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/imap-uw Makefile ports/mail/imap-uw/files
>>md5
ports/mail/imap-uw/patches patch-ab patch-aaports/mail/imap-uw/pkg
PLIST ports/mail/imap-uw/scripts configure
> I'm really really really unhappy about these shared library
> patches. This code changes WAY too fast to screw with shared
> libraries. If they cause massive breakage again, they're
> history.
Up until this commit, we were adding a target to Makefile ``fbd'' for
FreeBSD although there *was* a target for FreeBSD already as ``bsf''.
I guess this was making it difficult for the original developers to
integrate the changes we've been making (if they've ever tried to do
that).
What we should do, I think, is to submit our changes to the original
developer at UW once we patch up the DISTFILES and enable building the
shared libraries with ``make bsf''.
Cheers,
Max
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706032106.OAA01032>