Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 20:26:08 -0700 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r250426 - head/sys/contrib/octeon-sdk Message-ID: <CACVs6=-pLML57n8APGDGWVfG39KuO-Y1U6wJZzmb7gZZjZwX%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201305100257.r4A2vkfd062811@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201305100257.r4A2vkfd062811@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote: > Log: > Both my EBH5200 and GE WANIC 6354 have a RTC as well. It looks from > the Linux tree that they always include this chip in their FDT, so > make support for the ds1337 opt-out rather than opt-in. Now my boards > boot with the correct time. What boards did you test on without RTCs to verify that it doesn't cause hangs? The fact that there are two boards not enumerated which did have an RTC doesn't say anything about the boards that truly don't. Likewise, Linux's FDT is not authoritative for all boards. I'd feel better knowing this at least won't have a negative effect on boards without an RTC.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACVs6=-pLML57n8APGDGWVfG39KuO-Y1U6wJZzmb7gZZjZwX%2BQ>