Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:46:33 +0100 From: Patrick =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lamaizi=E8re?= <patfbsd@davenulle.org> To: "Don O'Neil" <lists@lizardhill.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best Journaling File System - ZFS/??? Message-ID: <20081203134633.57adc024@baby-jane> In-Reply-To: <B6DC69C36AB645CAB7E1237397B6BC41@mickey> References: <B6DC69C36AB645CAB7E1237397B6BC41@mickey>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:57:58 -0800, "Don O'Neil" <lists@lizardhill.com> a écrit : > With all the discussions of ZFS lately, I'm beginning to wonder if > it's really ready for a production environment. Concerns over memory > utilization, speed, stability, etc... > > So, my question is this... If you were building a brand new 6.3/7.0 > server with decent performance (dual core, 32 Bit OS - because of > known compatibility issues with specific software, 4 GB RAM, etc...) > what file system would you choose? What options are out there besides > UFS and ZFS? What FS's are least likely to have corruption issues > when there are power hits? May be UFS + gjournal. I use gjournal since FreeBSD 7.0 and it seems to work fine. Regards.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081203134633.57adc024>