Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:16:54 -0800
From:      "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com>
To:        "Andriy Gapon" <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: rc.d/mountd: confusing message (and behavior?)
Message-ID:  <7d6fde3d0901100716i552420ddja6a59a4938e70fc9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4968BB5D.8070909@icyb.net.ua>
References:  <4968AE90.5010004@icyb.net.ua> <7d6fde3d0901100711p70e9a66ahadc3c2570fc6f94b@mail.gmail.com> <4968BB5D.8070909@icyb.net.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> wrote:
> on 10/01/2009 17:11 Garrett Cooper said the following:
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> wrote:
>>> $ /etc/rc.d/mountd onestart
>>> /etc/rc.d/mountd: WARNING: /etc/exports is not readable.
>>> Exit 1
>>>
>>> Actually /etc/exports did not exist at all.
>>> And this was not a "WARNING", this was a fatal error, mountd did not start.
>>>
>>> Alsp, should it actually fail like this?  I have ZFS and I plan to do
>>> all NFS exports from ZFS, so /etc/exports would never be used.
>>
>> Uh, mountd is used for nfsd, so I'm not sure why you're trying to do
>> this...
>
> I thought that mountd and nfsd (and rpcbind) are still required even if
> exported filesystems are ZFS. Am I wrong on this?
>
>> The reference to /etc/exports is being picked up from
>> /etc/rc.d/mountd on this line:
>>
>> required_files="/etc/exports"
>>
>> and it's picking up the actual `does it exist?' test from:
>>
>> [gcooper@orangebox /usr/home/gcooper]$ grep -A 3 required_files /etc/rc.subr
>> #     required_files  n       If set, check for the readability of the given
>> #                             files before running a (re)start command.
>> #
>> #     required_modules n      If set, ensure the given kernel modules are
>> --
>>               rcvar required_dirs required_files required_vars
>>       eval unset ${_arg}_cmd ${_arg}_precmd ${_arg}_postcmd
>>
>>       case "$_file" in
>> --
>>               for _f in $required_files; do
>>                       if [ ! -r "${_f}" ]; then
>>                               warn "${_f} is not readable."
>>                               if [ -z "$rc_force" ]; then
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Garrett

Ok, dumb question -- does ZFS offer the same functionality as NFS? I
thought not...
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d0901100716i552420ddja6a59a4938e70fc9>