Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 06:12:03 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs Message-ID: <20100906131203.GA80251@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <4C84E4E1.8010709@freebsd.org> References: <201007141414.o6EEEUx9014690@lurza.secnetix.de> <AANLkTinYUz0V%2B2nSWBMYLf2fL8HnUQ-fvXT0q-5WY4bb@mail.gmail.com> <4C782D3B.6020407@icyb.net.ua> <201008271743.29393.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4C7835E6.6070309@icyb.net.ua> <4C7A2782.5040009@freebsd.org> <4C84DBE6.5010809@freebsd.org> <20100906122325.GA78727@icarus.home.lan> <4C84E4E1.8010709@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:56:01PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following: > >>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied > >>> either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending > >>> on the desired architecture: > >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/intel-cpu-topo.diff > >> > >> I see that I am not getting as many testers as I expected, so I am going to commit > >> the patch. > >> > >> You still have a short while to either objectively object to the patch or to > >> voluntary test it :-) > > > > I would gladly assist in testing this, except there doesn't appear to be > > an authoritative statement that it will apply to RELENG_8; when I see > > WIP, I assume -CURRENT/HEAD only. > > patch -C is much better than any statement :) > > > Let me know, since all the systems I have are Intel multi-core. > > Yes, the patch should be applicable to stable/8 without any issues. Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both RELENG_8: - Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10) - Supermicro X7SBL-LN2 + Intel C2D E6600 (stepping 6) I'll make sure to provide what the topology looks like before and after. Is CPU-relevant dmesg output sufficient? -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100906131203.GA80251>