Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:10:50 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net> To: Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ports in AMD64 distribution Message-ID: <20041214001050.168286d6@dolphin.local.net> In-Reply-To: <20041212191313.R22945@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20041212182100.F22745@zoraida.natserv.net> <41BCDD73.1060200@jrv.org> <20041212191313.R22945@zoraida.natserv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:18:41 -0500 (EST), Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote:
>
> > If you have access to a ports tree look for ONLY_FOR_ARCHS in the port
> > Makefile to see if the port has a problem.
>
> is that an indication of that port only working under certain
> architecture?
>
> Looking through the ports using find, see many. Still trying to figure out
> the right syntax to see the names.
> For example I used
>
> find . -name "Makefile" -exec grep ONLY_FOR_ARCHS {} \;
>
> But that doesn't show names
find /usr/ports -type f -depth 3 -name Makefile | xargs grep -l ^ONLY_FOR_ARCHS
--
Conrad J. Sabatier <conrads@cox.net> -- "In Unix veritas"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041214001050.168286d6>