From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Oct 24 02:28:53 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA05349
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 02:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from gatekeeper.barcode.co.il (gatekeeper.barcode.co.il [192.116.93.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA05340
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 02:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from nadav@barcode.co.il)
Received: (from nadav@localhost) by gatekeeper.barcode.co.il (8.8.5/8.6.12) id LAA10887; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 11:28:24 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 11:28:24 +0200 (IST)
From: Nadav Eiron <nadav@barcode.co.il>
To: Doug Lo <jwlo@ms11.hinet.net>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD 2.2.5-R solve 48MRAM problem?
In-Reply-To: <345009F5.DFF9BBDE@ms11.hinet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.971024112719.10805B-100000@gatekeeper.barcode.co.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, Doug Lo wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've been installing 48MRAM under FreeBSD 2.2.2-R, I saw the errata.txt,
> which said
> that installing 48MRam has a problem, and I encountered it.
> Would anony know FreeBSD 2.2.5-R has already solve this problem?

I used to have that problem on a DEC Venturis FX 5166 with various SNAPs 
of 2.2 (from July-August). The 2.2.5 971005 BETA didn't give me any 
problems, so it looks as if it's OK now.

> 
> Best regards,
> Doug.
> 
> 
Nadav