From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 5 07:30:35 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id HAA29729 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 07:30:35 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA29543 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 07:28:21 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id QAA22580 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 16:22:16 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id QAA24097 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 16:22:15 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id OAA01525 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 14:05:54 +0200 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199509051205.OAA01525@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: disklabel and file system differences between 1.1 and 2.0.5... To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 14:05:54 +0200 (MET DST) Reply-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) In-Reply-To: <199509041428.KAA05526@healer.com> from "Coranth Gryphon" at Sep 4, 95 10:28:32 am X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 438 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk As Coranth Gryphon wrote: > > Both are BSD 4.2 file systems. The difference is in the old partition vs. > new slice code. Nah, look into the description of the -c2 option to fsck(8) for an explanation of the difference. The slice code does not apply here, it's one level below file systems. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)