From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 25 19:55:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D10116A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:55:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail2.dbitech.ca (radius.wavefire.com [64.141.13.252])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B58E343D67
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:55:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from darcy@wavefire.com)
Received: (qmail 12779 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 20:38:36 -0000
Received: from dbitech.wavefire.com (HELO ?64.141.15.253?)
	(darcy@64.141.15.253)
	by radius.wavefire.com with SMTP; 25 Aug 2004 20:38:36 -0000
From: Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com>
Organization: Wavefire Technologies Corp.
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:55:53 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <200408242314.01915.zec@icir.org> <412BBDFA.5080508@elischer.org>
	<200408251544.18759.zec@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <200408251544.18759.zec@icir.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200408251255.53472.darcy@wavefire.com>
Subject: Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:55:56 -0000

On August 25, 2004 06:44 am, Marko Zec wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 August 2004 00:15, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > You do know don't you, that if you continue to do these things, you will
> > be punnished by
> > getting a CVS commit bit..?
>
> Well, I didn't write the code myself, just ported it from -CURRENT. Anyhow,
> glad to see that people still care about the 4.x branch.
>
> Re that commit bit, what kind of commiter would that be who only likes to
> work on -STABLE? :)

The kind that would be liked by those who like some of the features of 
-CURRENT, but  policy won't allow them to put them into production...


-- 
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx:  250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com