Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 16:22:04 +0930 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Andrew Atrens <atrens@nortel.ca>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, gram@cdsec.com, phk@critter.freebsd.dk, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in malloc/free Message-ID: <199709190652.QAA01100@word.smith.net.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Sep 1997 23:33:34 MST." <Pine.BSF.3.95.970918233308.1895E-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > probably a printf or other stdio function I *know* this. 8) I'm just trying to find the sucker. The 'ddd' example looked like it was spinning in abort(), which doesn't look like it will actually come back and call malloc() again. In olden days, if MALLOC_STATS was defined when malloc() was built, the stats dump used fprintf(), but this is not the case with 3.x. mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709190652.QAA01100>