Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:30:06 -0400 From: David Mehler <dave.mehler@gmail.com> To: User questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gnupg and gnupg2 Message-ID: <CAPORhP6NK9r-MaL9wZ_JYsNL%2Bk14spcPE2nhw9WXVxa0FWM%2BTQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CY1PR20MB0363D2E6765B7F258B1551DD801A0@CY1PR20MB0363.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> References: <CAPORhP46hhzQ8Nc-UR-E%2BdcaNtj7RX7uYq-gA8S99Gij%2B=rhdQ@mail.gmail.com> <d27daccd-e064-4fb1-9809-a786c9b4345a@Spark> <CY1PR20MB0363D2E6765B7F258B1551DD801A0@CY1PR20MB0363.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,
Thanks. Here's the output. Can I get clamav-unofficial-sigs to link
against gnupg and not gnupg1? Is this something the port should do?
pkg info -r gnupg
gnupg-2.1.20:
spamassassin-3.4.1_10
pkg info -r gnupg1
gnupg1-1.4.21_3:
clamav-unofficial-sigs-5.3.2_1
Thanks.
Dave.
On 4/21/17, Gerard Seibert <carmel_ny@outlook.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400, Jim Ohlstein stated:
>
>> On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler <dave.mehler@gmail.com>,
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and
>> > gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the
>> > gnupg2?
>
>> They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one
>> port that relies on each.
>
> Perhaps running "pkg info -r gnupg20"
>
> and "pkg info -r gnupg1" might help.
>
> Actually, the latest version in port is "gnupg-2.1.20" You might be
> able to remove the other two versions and just link to that one.
>
> --
> Carmel
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPORhP6NK9r-MaL9wZ_JYsNL%2Bk14spcPE2nhw9WXVxa0FWM%2BTQ>