From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 30 13:58:31 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F351F885;
 Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:58:30 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gwiley@verisign.com)
Received: from exprod6og120.obsmtp.com (exprod6og120.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81B6E255D;
 Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:58:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by
 exprod6ob120.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP
 ID DSNKUffGfzrLoDfx+YyE/zfG+Elg7uXUzkpE@postini.com;
 Tue, 30 Jul 2013 06:58:30 PDT
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com
 (brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.206])
 by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id r6UD3eaN021986
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL);
 Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:03:40 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by
 brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Tue, 30
 Jul 2013 09:03:40 -0400
From: "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com>
To: Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org"
 <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Bind in FreeBSD, security advisories
Thread-Topic: Bind in FreeBSD, security advisories
Thread-Index: AQHOjR9nu7+wS+edJUSJ+Xp1rPBZCZl9bpaAgAADZ4D//74sgA==
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:03:40 +0000
Message-ID: <CE1D31B0.E393%gwiley@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <1375189153.2267.3238635.3FA46177@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.6.130613
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <48900900AC1310488E223B9CF181EC27@verisign.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:58:31 -0000

The package would have to be reworked to remove the name server - not an
impossible task and you could make a case for it from an ideological
perspective, but is it worth the work?

On 7/30/13 8:59 AM, "Mark Felder" <feld@freebsd.org> wrote:

>On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 7:47, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>>=20
>> We could in theory remove the BIND's authoritative name server
>> executable... if that is attracting the SAs.
>>=20
>
>It's the same executable, that's the problem :-)
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"