Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:50:04 -0600
From:      Miguel <>
Subject:   Re: porteasy vs portupgrade
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Adam J Richardson escribió:
> Miguel wrote:
>> Hi, i used to use portupgrade as using this instructions 
>> for doing all the port managing, what about porteasy, it is as  good 
>> as portupgrade?
>> i think porteasy is not as popular as portupgrade.
>> thanks
> Hi Miguel,
> I use portupgrade and portsnap, a combination which seems to work 
> fine. The only thing that annoys me about portupgrade is that it's 
> written in Ruby, and when it's time for an upgrade I always have to 
> upgrade the Ruby compiler as well. Upgrading Ruby just takes forever 
> on these old battered beige boxes.

you are absolutly right, portsnap + portupgrade,

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>