Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:45:26 -0600
From:      "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ksh93
Message-ID:  <20010228144526.A54409@spawn.nectar.com>
In-Reply-To: <200102282036.f1SKarb55568@vic.sabbo.net>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:36:42PM %2B0200
References:  <20010228141838.B33017@hamlet.nectar.com> <200102282036.f1SKarb55568@vic.sabbo.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:36:42PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Well, inaccessible /usr excludes possibility to log-in remotely
> (inetd lives in /usr as well as demons from /usr/libexec). Therefore,
> in such case static non-standard shell in /bin makes little or
> no difference as user has to attend console anyway.

Correct, just as in the case of a broken libc.so.
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010228144526.A54409>