From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 28 12:45:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0799E37B719; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:45:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: by gw.nectar.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8EB6D18C91; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:45:26 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:45:26 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ksh93 Message-ID: <20010228144526.A54409@spawn.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Maxim Sobolev , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20010228141838.B33017@hamlet.nectar.com> <200102282036.f1SKarb55568@vic.sabbo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200102282036.f1SKarb55568@vic.sabbo.net>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:36:42PM +0200 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:36:42PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Well, inaccessible /usr excludes possibility to log-in remotely > (inetd lives in /usr as well as demons from /usr/libexec). Therefore, > in such case static non-standard shell in /bin makes little or > no difference as user has to attend console anyway. Correct, just as in the case of a broken libc.so. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message