Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:50:03 GMT From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/118902: wrong signatures in d2i_RSAPublicKey man pages Message-ID: <200712211650.lBLGo3Fi024064@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/118902; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk> To: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@gahr.ch> Cc: FreeBSD gnats submit <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: bin/118902: wrong signatures in d2i_RSAPublicKey man pages Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:33:24 +0100 On 2007.12.20 21:30:34 +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > the signatures for the following functions: > > d2i_RSAPublicKey > d2i_RSA_PUBKEY > d2i_RSAPrivateKey > d2i_Netscape_RSA > > are wrong in our man pages. [...] The manual pages are actually generated from the upstream POD documentation (openssl/doc/crypto/d2i_RSAPublicKey.pod) so the changes need to be made to the POD files. Otherwise they will simply vanish after next import. Any chance you could submit the changes directly to the OpenSSL project [1]? Then we would get the fixes when the next version of OpenSSL is imported. Does the source changes fix actual bugs or is it just style/warning? If they don't fix real bugs I would prefer for them also to go via OpenSSL to not divert from upstream more than needed. [1] http://www.openssl.org/support/rt.html -- Simon L. Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200712211650.lBLGo3Fi024064>