From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 4 13:43:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7955D16A4CE for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:43:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sirius.firepipe.net (sirius.firepipe.net [69.13.116.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA1343D60 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:43:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by sirius.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1CA9718033; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:43:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:43:32 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Rostislav Krasny Message-ID: <20040804134332.GG26004@sirius.firepipe.net> Mail-Followup-To: Rostislav Krasny , Will Andrews , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20040802145839.GC35864@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040804132404.81709.qmail@web14823.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RDS4xtyBfx+7DiaI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040804132404.81709.qmail@web14823.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Will Andrews Subject: Re: No new snapshot of 5-CURRENT anymore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:43:32 -0000 --RDS4xtyBfx+7DiaI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 06:24:04AM -0700, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > I just tried to install 5.2-CURRENT-20040804-SESNAP snapshot using FTP > installation with floppies, but I failed. First of all, the sysinstall > have only one FTP URL of snapshots - the JP one. Secondly, it isn't > obvious what manual URL should be used. So I've tried following URLs: Someone else reported the same problem with the AMD64 snaps. Unfortunately, I don't have time to investigate this until after Friday, so it will be a few days before I can figure out why the snaps aren't being built with knowledge of the custom name. :-/ (A reminder sent to my email address on Friday afternoon would be greatly appreciated.) Regards, --=20 wca --RDS4xtyBfx+7DiaI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBEOgDF47idPgWcsURArc0AJ40GamLjnAyVq0Bz1tCQXc8sSgJ0QCfSHFa J5RmXOy95RpqCHd7f3MqW0w= =qSuq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RDS4xtyBfx+7DiaI--