From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 21 15:15:13 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CFE37B401 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:15:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from nazare.cin.ufpe.br (nazare.cin.ufpe.br [150.161.2.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EA643F75 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:15:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rss@cin.ufpe.br) Received: (from root@localhost) by nazare.cin.ufpe.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2LNF0N77426; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:15:00 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from rss@nazare.cin.ufpe.br) Received: from jurema.cin.ufpe.br (jurema [172.17.33.106]) by nazare.cin.ufpe.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2LNExN36982; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:14:59 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from rss@nazare.cin.ufpe.br) Received: from rss (helo=localhost) by jurema.cin.ufpe.br with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18wUES-0001L1-00; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:39:20 -0300 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:39:20 -0300 (BRT) From: Rossam Souza Silva To: Chris Fowler Cc: David Leimbach , Subject: Re: IP over IEEE1394? In-Reply-To: <1048284124.1788.8.camel@hp.outpostsentinel.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21 Mar 2003, Chris Fowler wrote: > I'm not sure I understand the motivations of running IP over firewire > vs. ethernet. Sure I think its cool but will the speed be there with > firewire2? On Windows, It is P-t-P is it not? I would prefer a real > live network. Hi, I don't know about the Mac's implementation, but yes, Windows has IP over Firewire, like NetBSD. The good reason for IP over Firewire: because it's a standard, you can connect Macs, Win Boxes and BSDs! :) Rossam. > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 08:25, David Leimbach wrote: > > Interesting... I didn't even know we had Ethernet over firewire :). > > > > Mac OS X and Windows XP both have IP over firewire either working or > > in the works and somewhat usable. The only one I can claim any > > experience > > with is Mac OS X. It's somewhat flaky though and you get unreliable > > spikes > > in some basic performance tests I have done with it. > > > > It would be a really interesting value added feature for FreeBSD 5.x > > and could potentially open FBSD up even more to the "cluster" market > > which is somewhere its not as proliferated as linux. > > > > With the advent of firewire2 on the horizon it may be even more > > impressive. > > > > I believe there is even an Oracle product for linux which can cluster > > databases > > over firewire now. [I don't know if its IP though] > > > > > > Dave > > On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 01:43 AM, Rossam Souza Silva wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, there is some plan to port NetBSD's implementation of IP over > > > Firewire? I know, we have "Ethernet over Firewire", but like the Linux > > > one, isn't a standard... > > > > > > Just curious. > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------- > > > (_ ) "Contrary to popular belief, UNIX is user friendly. It just > > > happens > > > \\\'',) ^ to be very selective about who it decides to make friends > > > with." > > > \/ \( > > > .\._/_) Rossam Souza Silva (rss@cin.ufpe.br) > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message