From owner-freebsd-ports Sat May 12 17:12:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.107]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B4637B423 for ; Sat, 12 May 2001 17:12:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pat@databits.net) Received: from bsod ([24.5.63.190]) by femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010513001247.CNDR22926.femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com@bsod>; Sat, 12 May 2001 17:12:47 -0700 Message-ID: <002d01c0db41$70cdda30$0200a8c0@bsod> From: "Patrick Li" To: "David W. Chapman Jr." , References: <01b601c0db3c$5b02ba40$931576d8@inethouston.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 20:12:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2465.0003 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2465.0003 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org how about samba20 and samba22 and change description in pkg-descr to not confuse people. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "John Polstra" ; "Ade Lovett" Cc: ; ; Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 7:36 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > So how do we have both ports exist without confusing people by keeping samba > 2.2.0 as samba devel, because I've gotten a few emails about people > wondering about its stability. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message