Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:10:58 +0100
From:      Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net>
To:        Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: panic on 5.2 BETA: blockable sleep lock
Message-ID:  <1070183457.1099.2.camel@shoeserv.freebsd>
In-Reply-To: <200311280002.hAS029eF016292@gw.catspoiler.org>
References:  <200311280002.hAS029eF016292@gw.catspoiler.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 01:02, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 27 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 08:33, Don Lewis wrote:
> >> The problem is that selrecord() wants to lock a MTX_DEF mutex, which can
> >> cause a context switch if the mutex is already locked by another thread.
> >> This is contrary to what bktr_poll() wants to accomplish by calling
> >> critical_enter().
> > 
> > Strange enough that does not seem to happen with a kernel built without
> > INVARIANTS and WITNESS. Does this make any sense or is this just by
> > chance?
> 
> You might try the patch below with WITNESS enabled.  I don't have the
> hardware, so I can't test it.  It compiles for me, but for all I know it
> could delete all your files if you run it.

Any chance for getting this committed?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1070183457.1099.2.camel>