Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:19:51 +0100 From: Hugo Meiland <hugo@chem.leidenuniv.nl> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my first port Message-ID: <FF57D83C-5F11-11D8-9D03-000A95A98928@chem.leidenuniv.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040214151057.GQ3365@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20040214151057.GQ3365@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
thanks, that was the info i was looking for.... could you please close this one (62780), then i will re-submit a 'readable' one...submitted as 62840 thanks again, Hugo On Feb 14, 2004, at 16:10, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>> (02.14.2004 @ 0306 PST): Hugo Meiland said, in 0.6K: << >> Hi All, >> >> A few days ago I took up the courage and send my first PR with my very >> first own created port...now i'm not quite sure.... >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=62780 >> here is the port listed, and the included patch is gone trough: >> shar -> tar -> compress -> uuencode -> pr-send >> anything i should change or is this really the correct process? >> >> Thank all in advance, >> Hugo >>> end of "my first port" from Hugo Meiland << > > The process isn't incorrect, the more correcter process is simply > shar -> send-pr. > > Please check on: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ > porting-submitting.html > and ignore the part about tarballing and uuencoding it. > > Basically, shar `find ./portname` > yourport.shar ; send-pr -a > ./yourport.shar > > What you submitted isn't incorrect or invalid. But, with my limited > FreeBSD time, I personally tend to ignore PRs where I can't read the > content, and I know I'm not the only one. > > # Adam > > > -- > Adam Weinberger > adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net > http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FF57D83C-5F11-11D8-9D03-000A95A98928>