From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 14:35:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 2BDF6B38; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:35:15 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Pietro Cerutti Subject: Re: svn commit: r346114 - head/devel/p4.el Message-ID: <20140310143515.GB92282@FreeBSD.org> References: <201402260657.s1Q6vEsH059562@svn.freebsd.org> <20140226123420.f5c0d0ff40b404a70334da4b@FreeBSD.org> <20140310072423.GC11693@FreeBSD.org> <3D82157DD87FC9C0C7724278@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20140310141659.GG11135@gahrfit.gahr.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140310141659.GG11135@gahrfit.gahr.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold , Adam Weinberger , Emanuel Haupt X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:35:15 -0000 On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 03:16:59PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > ports-policy-change-announce@ comes to mind :) Has anybody else ever felt > the desire to get notified whenever a policy is updated? Just to avoid > having to skim through commit logs. It's getting a bit ridiculuos, no? Guys, nothing was discussed thus far which does not come naturally from common sense. Certainly there are few special cases that require deeper analysis (e.g. proper, legally-clean LICENSE handling), but from what I see, most of "please don't/do this-or-that" stuff comes from negligence rather than deliberate dissent from PHB or common practices. If every committer would review *entire* Makefile before 'svn ci', there would be presumably less messages on the lists. :) ./danfe