Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 21:59:12 +0200 From: Paolo Pisati <piso@FreeBSD.org> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Paolo Pisati <piso@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 intr_machdep.c src/sys/i386/i386 intr_machdep.c src/sys/kern kern_intr.c src/sys/sys interrupt.h Message-ID: <20070506195912.GA2193@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <20070506192925.GP17958@funkthat.com> References: <200705061702.l46H2oVK057260@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070506174426.GO17958@funkthat.com> <20070506191027.GA2050@tin.it> <20070506192925.GP17958@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:29:25PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > It's still useful to have as a reference... It's easy to document which > arches are still missing the parts... ok, then i'll do that. > > But in another email you said that specifing just FILTER_SCHEDULE_THREAD > (without FILTER_HANDLED) is illegal, but the above states that either > FILTER_HANDLED or FILTER_SCHEDULE_THREAD is valid.. ops, didn't notice that... anyway yes, a filter can only return: FILTER_STRAY or FILTER_HANDLED or FILTER_HANDLED | FILTER_SCHEDULE_THREAD any other combination is wrong, and i'll fix the comment above. > kmacy is probably a better person to talk to about this... Though I > have done some work on sun4v, I don't have immediate access to one, > and didn't work on the low level interrupt code as much as kmacy did... /summon kmacy bye, P.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070506195912.GA2193>