Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:33:53 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/93705: [patch] ENODATA and EGREGIOUS (for glibc compat) Message-ID: <ygeirqq1r3i.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <200603071020.k27AK8YX016306@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200603071020.k27AK8YX016306@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:20:08 GMT
>>>>> Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> said:
roam> Second, ISTR that ENOATTR and ENODATA actually came into FreeBSD as part
roam> of the KAME project integration a long time ago, and then - not so long
roam> ago - ENODATA was *removed* since it was declared obsolete by the
roam> upstream KAME project. At least, that's the impression I got when it
roam> had to be removed or ifdef'd out of a couple of my ports :)
Do you mean EAI_NODATA? KAME doesn't related to ENODATA nor ENOATTR.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygeirqq1r3i.wl%ume>