Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:24:58 -0500 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: jw <jwdevel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with VESA and 1680x1050 Message-ID: <1247567099.1745.15.camel@balrog.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <fa8771800907132258l77e04677nea41a79782857495@mail.gmail.com> References: <fa8771800907121753k5cff6c18w53c21568f2f42a48@mail.gmail.com> <4A5AA977.8080200@halplant.com> <1247497763.1745.11.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <fa8771800907132258l77e04677nea41a79782857495@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-LjqzgbQWzW0qAOgGloMK Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 22:58 -0700, jw wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Robert Noland<rnoland@freebsd.org> wrote= : > > > > You can try nouveau with and/or without my kernel patch for drm support= . > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/drm-nouveau-043009.patch > > > > which should work with the current ports of libdrm and > > xf86-video-nouveau. > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/drm-nouveau-062309.patch > > > > should work with libdrm and nouveau from git. IGP chips should be > > supported. I would be interested to hear reports of success or failure > > either way. > > >=20 > Thanks - I'll give it a shot when I have a chance - does that support > 64bit? (forgot to mention that in my original mail) Yes, my test boxes are amd64. robert. > -John --=20 Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> FreeBSD --=-LjqzgbQWzW0qAOgGloMK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkpcXPoACgkQM4TrQ4qfROPyBQCfadXPoxaPeSTsVPqTHhZ9IYtT KQEAnAg+COZg7GaR3A8La5QS+KRKHMg0 =o22B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-LjqzgbQWzW0qAOgGloMK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1247567099.1745.15.camel>