From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 13 17:04:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521D416A420 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2FD13C4F9 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1DH4MoQ076781; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:04:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080213110427.02527db8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:06:09 -0600 To: Victor Farah From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <47B31441.8040801@netmediaservices.net> References: <47B1F883.6020407@netmediaservices.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20080212180525.024f9b80@mail.computinginnovations.com> <47B31441.8040801@netmediaservices.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:04:43 -0000 At 10:01 AM 2/13/2008, Victor Farah wrote: >I'm updating the system to 6.3-release now. > >All 13 machines are on the same subnet but they are scattered across >different switchs. > >netstat -m: >7716/399/8115 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) >7388/326/7714/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >7380/41 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) >0/0/0/0 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >0/0/0/0 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >0/0/0/0 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >16705K/751K/17456K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) >0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) >0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) >0/6/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) >0 requests for sfbufs denied >0 requests for sfbufs delayed >0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile >193374 calls to protocol drain routines > >ifconfig -a: >em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=b > inet 192.168.X.X netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.X.255 > ether 00:1b:fc:ef:34:de > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) > status: active >em1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=b > inet X.X.X.X netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast X.X.X.255 > ether 00:1b:fc:ef:34:df > media: Ethernet 1000baseTX > status: active >plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 >lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 What IP's are you trying to configure on em0 and em1? These cannot be on the same subnet unless you are trying to bond them, which I don't believe is available in 6.X. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.