Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 02:46:23 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>, "net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) 8129 testers wanted [Re: Question about GPIO bitbang MII] Message-ID: <5E65282B-DBCB-4143-93DE-3501A0D72E22@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <20111015205616.GL39118@alchemy.franken.de> References: <CANf5e8bcAfrXX%2BuqzVRoZJPmsvyPegx%2BFOYHSt-GHwEigUCoeg@mail.gmail.com> <20111009165838.GA19886@alchemy.franken.de> <20111010192238.GC1781@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20111011212318.GC81376@alchemy.franken.de> <20111011225531.GD5661@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20111012204222.GC39118@alchemy.franken.de> <20111012235707.GD9138@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20111013214903.GH39118@alchemy.franken.de> <20111014203226.GA16192@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20111015205616.GL39118@alchemy.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> wrote: >=20 > Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for > rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following > patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything? > for 9/head: > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff > for 8: > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff8 >=20 > Thanks, > Marius >=20 While I don't have any box with this hardware, I'm thinking you might want t= o get a bit more specific about what you want tested... What do you think the patch might break ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5E65282B-DBCB-4143-93DE-3501A0D72E22>