From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 26 15:10:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C575D16A417 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: from smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA73913C47E for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: (qmail 60058 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2007 14:43:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.mikestammer.com) (mikestammer@sbcglobal.net@70.131.104.73 with login) by smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2007 14:43:22 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: yikG6UcVM1nrJN7xL3v7iBtbyRlTrMgi_gtiKMbFN0CNEZ7M6Bo_81.EXJsYnV3dnbyozgpelfCL5X7gatZiAKKdaWRjlA.W0RSNK5w76xVwpCfI_A-- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8485B8DE; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:43:31 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mikestammer.com Received: from mail.mikestammer.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gondolin.middleearth.mikestammer.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L1LQyKq9uJHG; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:43:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eric) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEF7B84F; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:43:24 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <46A8B301.7080903@mikestammer.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:43:13 -0500 From: Eric User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miguel References: <46A7E417.5040800@123.com.sv> <46A8144C.7010503@crackmonkey.us> <46A8B49C.6070903@123.com.sv> In-Reply-To: <46A8B49C.6070903@123.com.sv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: porteasy vs portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:10:03 -0000 Miguel wrote: > Adam J Richardson escribió: >> Miguel wrote: >>> Hi, i used to use portupgrade as using this instructions >>> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/11/29/Big_Scary_Daemons.html >>> for doing all the port managing, what about porteasy, it is as good >>> as portupgrade? >>> i think porteasy is not as popular as portupgrade. >>> thanks >> >> Hi Miguel, >> >> I use portupgrade and portsnap, a combination which seems to work >> fine. The only thing that annoys me about portupgrade is that it's >> written in Ruby, and when it's time for an upgrade I always have to >> upgrade the Ruby compiler as well. Upgrading Ruby just takes forever >> on these old battered beige boxes. >> > > you are absolutly right, portsnap + portupgrade, > thakns > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" try portmaster as a replacement to portupgrade. No dependencies and it works great.