From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 24 18:19:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEFD16A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:19:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC7843D53 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:19:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3OIJVKl039223; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3OIJUJr039222; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: leguin.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eta@lclark.edu using -f From: Eric Anholt To: None In-Reply-To: <20050423160713.GA24432@lazir.toya.net.pl> References: <20050423005715.G16129@it.hackers> <1114212379.955.15.camel@leguin> <20050423184110.O37477@it.hackers> <20050423160713.GA24432@lazir.toya.net.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:19:29 -0700 Message-Id: <1114366769.965.0.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mgadrm fail in -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:19:58 -0000 On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 18:07 +0200, None wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 06:43:00PM +0400, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > >On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 01:01 +0400, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote: > > >>Hello All, > > >>I've just compiled -CURRENT (cvsup some hours ago) and the magdrm seemed > > >>to be fail. > > >>Last week's -CURRENT build was okay. > > > > > >Do you have device drm in your kernel? > > >Did you do a clean build? > > > > > > > Aha, I checked the config/NOTES and noticed that the new line: device drm > > Thank you :) > > > > >There's no real reason to be building the drm into the kernel that I can > > >see, as it's automatically loaded for you by the X Server. > > i might be off here, and dont intend to cause any offtopicness, altho i > was informed perhaphs wrongly, that kernel-builtin drivers are having > some speed improvements compared to loaded modules? I've never seen any measurements showing that that's the case, and would highly doubt there being any measurable effect. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org