From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 26 08:39:43 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AD437B404
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net
	(207-173-231-121.bras01.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [207.173.231.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F1443F75
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:39:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net)
Received: from tagalong (unknown [165.107.42.110])
	by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 65DD9EE559; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <001801c2f3b6$4bd0d590$6e2a6ba5@tagalong>
From: "Drew Tomlinson" <drew@mykitchentable.net>
To: "Dan Pelleg" <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org>
References: <00cc01c2f303$07ec8df0$6e2a6ba5@tagalong>
	<u2s65q7xkcj.fsf@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:39:38 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.9 required=5.0
	tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES
	autolearn=ham	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: IPFW - Why Doesn't This Rule Match? -- SOLVED
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:40:14 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Pelleg" <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org>
To: "Drew Tomlinson" <drew@mykitchentable.net>
Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: IPFW - Why Doesn't This Rule Match?


> "Drew Tomlinson" <drew@mykitchentable.net> writes:
>
> > I am using the following rules to match traffic on my home network with
a
> > FBSD 4.8 firewall.  The first rule matches but the second doesn't.
Here's
> > the rules:
> >
> > # Match this specific traffic
> > 00700        288     329708 count ip from 192.168.1.3 8080 to any
> >
> > # Match everything else
> > 00800          0          0 count ip from not 192.168.1.3 8080 to any
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what I am missing?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Drew
>
> Probably because the "not" applies just to the address, and not to the
port
> number.

Thanks, that was it.  By changing the rule to 'not 192.168.1.3 not 8080',
the rule started matching packets as I expected.

I appreciate the help!

Drew