Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 9 Aug 2014 17:22:39 +0200
From:      Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To:        "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions !!!! <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ps question ....
Message-ID:  <20140809172239.ae877c88.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <53E63BB0.2080700@hiwaay.net>
References:  <53E637AC.3010008@hiwaay.net> <20140809170150.0b1c9486.freebsd@edvax.de> <53E63BB0.2080700@hiwaay.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:18:08 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> On 08/09/14 10:01, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:01:00 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> >>
> >> .... is there a way to get ps to show me *everything* running ? 'ps
> >> -elf' works nicely under Fedora 14 ....
> > What about "ps aux"? See "man ps" for details.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Thanks, I forgot about the different behavior w/ & w/o the minus sign 
> :-/ ....

As far as I can tell, there is no difference in behaviour.
The commands

	% ps aux

and

	% ps -aux

as well as

	% ps -a -u -x

produce the same output.



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140809172239.ae877c88.freebsd>