Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:14:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211414150.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BD9QhuOX%2BXx47XJBicKB-zVZf588ViXeCa-9ZP7s5p8%2BTSRaQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211350250.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhuOX%2BXx47XJBicKB-zVZf588ViXeCa-9ZP7s5p8%2BTSRaQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Wojciech Puchar < > wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > >> stick with UFS. It JUST WORKS(R), and is trusty. >> And it works fast. >> >> > The correct answer would be. I depends on the work load.... For different kinds of production workload it doesn't, aat least for me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211414150.2263>